請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/102050完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 顏伯勳 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | BO-SHIUN YAN | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 王靖如 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Ching-Ju Wang | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-03-12T16:13:05Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-03-13 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2026-03-12 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2026-01-30 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. Tosh, K., et al. (2006). Variants in the SP110 gene are associated with genetic susceptibility to tuberculosis in West Africa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(27), 10364–10368.
2. Bloch, D. B., et al. (2000). Sp110 localizes to the PML-Sp100 nuclear body and may function as a nuclear hormone receptor transcriptional coactivator. Molecular and cellular biology, 20(16), 6138–6146. 3. Fox, G. J., et al. (2014). Polymorphisms of SP110 Are Associated with both Pulmonary and Extra-Pulmonary Tuberculosis among the Vietnamese. PLOS ONE, 9(7), e99496. 4. Wu, Y., et al. (2016). The Transcriptional Foundations of Sp110-mediated Macrophage (RAW264.7) Resistance to Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Ra. Sci Rep 6, 22041. 5. Leu, J. S., et al. (2018). Functional domains of SP110 that modulate its transcriptional regulatory function and cellular translocation. Journal of biomedical science, 25(1), 34. 6. Bloch, D. B., et al. (2000). Sp110 localizes to the PML-Sp100 nuclear body and may function as a nuclear hormone receptor transcriptional coactivator. Molecular and cellular biology, 20(16), 6138–6146. 7. Hofmann, T., et al. (2003). Body language: the function of PML nuclear bodies in apoptosis regulation. Cell Death Differ, 10, 1290–1299. 8. Fraschilla, I., & Jeffrey, K. L. (2020). The Speckled Protein (SP) Family: Immunity's Chromatin Readers. Trends in immunology, 41(7), 572–585. 9. Muñoz-Velasco, I., et al. (2025). Nucleolar origins: challenging perspectives on evolution and function. Open Biol,15(3), 240330. 10. Trumtel, S., et al . (2000). Assembly and functional organization of the nucleolus: ultrastructural analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants. Molecular biology of the cell, 11(6), 2175–2189. 11. Hernandez‐Verdun, D., et al. (2010). The nucleolus: structure/function relationship in RNA metabolism. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: RNA, 1(3), 415-431. 12. Dubois, M. L., & Boisvert, F. M. (2016). The nucleolus: structure and function. In The functional nucleus (pp. 29-49). Cham: Springer International Publishing. 13. Yang, K., et al. (2018). Nucleolar Stress: hallmarks, sensing mechanism and diseases. Cell stress, 2(6), 125. 14. Stochaj, U., & Weber, S. C. (2020). Nucleolar Organization and Functions in Health and Disease. Cells 9, 526. 15. Lu, J., et al. (2021). Types of nuclear localization signals and mechanisms of protein import into the nucleus. Cell communication and signaling : CCS, 19(1), 60. 16. Yang, C. P., et al. (2015). Identification and characterization of nuclear and nucleolar localization signals in 58-kDa microspherule protein (MSP58). Journal of biomedical science, 22(1), 33. 17. Chen, D., et al. (2025). Cell cycle duration determines oncogenic transformation capacity. Nature, 641(8065), 1309–1318. 18. Blagosklonny M. V. (2023). Selective protection of normal cells from chemotherapy, while killing drug-resistant cancer cells. Oncotarget, 14, 193–206. 19. Li Y. (2024). DNA Adducts in Cancer Chemotherapy. Journal of medicinal chemistry, 67(7), 5113–5143. 20. Lang, F., et al. (2024). Abrogation of the G2/M checkpoint as a chemosensitization approach for alkylating agents. Neuro-oncology, 26(6), 1083–1096. 21. Hannun Y. A. (1997). Apoptosis and the dilemma of cancer chemotherapy. Blood, 89(6), 1845–1853. 22. Leung, J. C., & Cassimeris, L. (2019). Reorganization of paclitaxel-stabilized microtubule arrays at mitotic entry: roles of depolymerizing kinesins and severing proteins. Cancer biology & therapy, 20(10), 1337–1347. 23. Bozdaganyan, M., Fedorov, V., Kholina, E., Kovalenko, I., Gudimchuk, N., & Orekhov, P. (2025). Exploring tubulin-paclitaxel binding modes through extensive molecular dynamics simulations. Scientific reports, 15(1), 8378. 24. Prota, A. E., et al. (2023). Structural insight into the stabilization of microtubules by taxanes. eLife, 12, e84791. 25. Mohseni, M., et al. (2016). Co-treatment by docetaxel and vinblastine breaks down P-glycoprotein mediated chemo-resistance. Iranian journal of basic medical sciences, 19(3), 300–309. 26. Du, D., et al. (2021). Blocking circ_0014130 suppressed drug resistance and malignant behaviors of docetaxel resistance-acquired NSCLC cells via regulating miR-545-3p-YAP1 axis. Cytotechnology, 73(4), 571–584. 27. Malvezzi, S., et al. (2017). Mechanism of RNA polymerase II stalling by DNA alkylation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(46), 12172–12177. 28. Basu, A., & Krishnamurthy, S. (2010). Cellular responses to Cisplatin-induced DNA damage. Journal of nucleic acids, 2010, 201367. 29. Li, L., et al. (2018). Long non-coding RNA CASC2 enhanced cisplatin-induced viability inhibition of non-small cell lung cancer cells by regulating the PTEN/PI3K/Akt pathway through down-regulation of miR-18a and miR-21. RSC advances, 8(29), 15923–15932. 30. Tang, Z., et al. (2022). Icariside II enhances cisplatin-induced apoptosis by promoting endoplasmic reticulum stress signalling in non-small cell lung cancer cells. International journal of biological sciences, 18(5), 2060–2074. 31. Van Ravenstein, et al. (2022). Topoisomerase II poisons inhibit vertebrate DNA replication through distinct mechanisms. The EMBO journal, 41(12), e110632. 32. Kciuk, M., et al. (2023). Doxorubicin-An Agent with Multiple Mechanisms of Anticancer Activity. Cells, 12(4), 659. 33. Wu, W., et al. (2015). Aspartate-modified doxorubicin on its N-terminal increases drug accumulation in LAT1-overexpressing tumors. Cancer science, 106(6), 747–756. 34. Tao, L., et al. (2020). MiR-451a attenuates doxorubicin resistance in lung cancer via suppressing epithelialmesenchymal transition (EMT) through targeting c-Myc. Biomed Pharmacother, 125, 109962. 35. Xu, L., et al. (2020). Morphological transformation enhances Tumor Retention by Regulating the Self-assembly of Doxorubicin-peptide Conjugates. Theranostics, 10(18), 8162–8178. 36. Alzahrani, S. M., et al. (2023). 5 Fluorouracil and capecitabine therapies for the treatment of colorectal cancer (Review). Oncology reports, 50(4), 175. 37. Chen, J. K., et al. (2024). An RNA damage response network mediates the lethality of 5-FU in colorectal cancer. Cell reports. Medicine, 5(10), 101778. 38. Rabacow, A. P. M., et al. (2018). Evaluation of the Antitumor Potential of the Resorcinolic Lipid 3-Heptyl-3,4,6-trimethoxy-3H-isobenzofuran-1-one in Breast Cancer Cells. Anticancer research, 38(8), 4565–4576. 39. Abe, K., et al. (2021). Targeting stanniocalcin-1-expressing tumor cells elicits efficient antitumor effects in a mouse model of human lung cancer. Cancer medicine, 10(9), 3085–3100. 40. Tan, X., et al. (2021). Overexpression of microRNA-124-5p sensitizes non-small cell lung cancer cells to treatment with 5-fluorouracil via AEG-1 regulation. Oncology letters, 21(1), 5. 41. Montecucco, A., et al. (2015). Molecular mechanisms of etoposide. EXCLI journal, 14, 95–108. 42. Fan, H. Y., et al. (2021). Insight Into the Molecular Mechanism of Podophyllotoxin Derivatives as Anticancer Drugs. Front Cell Dev Biol, 9, 709075. 43. lor, A. C., et al. (2025). Noncanonical inhibition of topoisomerase II alpha by oxidative stress metabolites. Redox biol, 80, 103504. 44. Day, T. W., et al. (2009). Etoposide induces protein kinase Cdelta- and caspase-3-dependent apoptosis in neuroblastoma cancer cells. Molecular pharmacology, 76(3), 632–640. 45. Dong, Q., et al. (2020). Lactate-induced MRP1 expression contributes to metabolism-based etoposide resistance in non-small cell lung cancer cells. Cell Commun Signal, 18(1), 167. 46. Kriger, D., et al. (2022). Alpha-actnin-4 (ACTN4) selectively affects the DNA double-strand breaks repair in non-small lung carcinoma cells. Biology direct, 17(1), 40. 47. Burger, K., et al. (2010). Chemotherapeutic drugs inhibit ribosome biogenesis at various levels. The Journal of biological chemistry, 285(16), 12416–12425. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/102050 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | SP110是一種受干擾素調控的核蛋白,屬於SP100/140家族。在人類中,其主要功能包括調控基因轉錄和調節免疫反應。目前已鑑定出三種主要亞型:SP110a、SP110b和SP110c。這些蛋白常被稱為“斑點蛋白”,因為它們會形成聚集體,並與核體共定位。核體是參與許多關鍵細胞反應的大分子結構,例如轉錄調控、細胞分裂、細胞凋亡、細胞老化以及對DNA損傷或感染的反應。在我們先前的研究中,我們鑑定了SP110中兩個潛在的核定位訊號NLS1和NLS2,並證實NLS1可以將SP110轉位到核仁,顯示NLS1具有隱藏的核仁定位訊號(NoLS)功能。儘管SP110b攜帶核仁定位訊號,但在常氧條件下,其在H1299肺癌細胞中表達時,僅極少部分(低於5%)被轉位於核仁。我們進一步證實,微氧顯著增強了SP110的核仁轉位。有趣的是,SP110b的突變體SP110b Mut1+3(NLS1發生突變)即使在常氧條件下也表現出強烈的核仁轉位。SP110b的核仁轉位似乎影響癌細胞的行為:它促進H1299細胞的克隆(細胞群)形成,並延緩微氧誘導的細胞死亡,暗示其可能在促進癌細胞存活和賦予其化療抗藥性方面發揮作用。因此,本研究探討了SP110b的核仁轉位如何影響細胞對化療藥物 (特別是Docetaxel、Cisplatin、Doxorubicin、5-FU和Etoposide)的反應,並探討了其潛在的機制。我們的研究結果顯示,SP110b驅動的核仁轉位增強了Docetaxel、Cisplatin及5-FU處理的H1299細胞存活率。在另一種肺癌細胞系PC9細胞中,SP110b也影響藥物反應;然而,與H1299細胞不同,這些治療並未導致總存活期的顯著差異。免疫螢光分析顯示,Cisplatin及Etoposide處理後,H1299細胞中核仁蛋白的分佈改變。在PC9細胞中,Cisplatin、Doxorubicin及5-FU處理後觀察到異常的核仁蛋白模式。此外,5-FU 治療導致部分的 SP110b Mut1+3 蛋白失去其核仁定位。這項研究顯示微氧或突變誘導的 SP110b 核仁轉位可能透過改變核仁組織來增強肺癌細胞的存活率並調節對化療藥物的敏感性。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | SP110 is an interferon-regulated nuclear protein belonging to the SP100/140 family. In humans, its primary roles include regulating gene transcription and modulating immune responses. Three major isoforms have been identified: SP110a, SP110b, and SP110c. These proteins are often referred to as “speckle proteins” because they form aggregates that are co-localized with nuclear bodies, macromolecular structures involved in key cellular processes, such as transcriptional regulation, cell division, apoptosis, senescence, and responses to DNA damage or infection. In our previous studies, we identified two potential nuclear localization signals, NLS1 and NLS2, within SP110 and showed that NLS1 can direct SP110 to the nucleolus, indicating that NLS1 functions as a cryptic nucleolar localization signal (NoLS). Although SP110b carries this NoLS, it localizes to the nucleolus only infrequently (less than 5%) when expressed in H1299 lung cancer cells under normoxic conditions. We further demonstrated that hypoxia dramatically enhances SP110 nucleolar localization. Interestingly, a mutant form of SP110b, SP110b Mut1+3, which contains a mutation in NLS1, shows strong nucleolar localization even under normoxia. Nucleolar localization of SP110b appears to influence cancer cell behavior: it promotes colony formation in H1299 cells and delays hypoxia-induced cell death, suggesting a potential role in promoting cancer cell survival and conferring resistance to chemotherapeutic agents. Therefore, the present study investigates how SP110b’s nucleolar translocation affects cellular responses to anticancer drugs, specifically cisplatin, docetaxel, doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and etoposide, as well as explores potential underlying mechanisms. Our findings indicate that SP110b-driven nucleolar translocation enhances the survival of H1299 cells treated with docetaxel, cisplatin, or 5-FU. In PC9 cells, another lung cancer cell line, SP110b also influences drug responses; however, unlike in H1299 cells, these treatments do not lead to significant differences in overall survival. Immunofluorescence analysis shows that nucleolin distribution becomes altered in H1299 cells following cisplatin and etoposide exposure. In PC9 cells, abnormal nucleolin patterns are observed after treatment with cisplatin, doxorubicin, and 5-FU. Furthermore, 5-FU treatment causes a portion of the SP110b Mut1+3 protein to lose its nucleolar localization. This study suggests that hypoxia- or mutation-induced nucleolar localization of SP110b may enhance lung cancer cell survival and modulate sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents by altering nucleolar organization. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2026-03-12T16:13:05Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2026-03-12T16:13:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目次
誌謝 i 中文摘要 ii Abstract iii 圖次 vii 附錄 viii 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 SP110 1 1.2 核仁(Nucleolus) 1 1.3 核定位訊號(Nuclear localization signal, NLS) 2 1.4 核仁定位訊號(Nucleolar localization signal, NoLS) 2 1.5 化療藥物(Anti-cancer chemotherapy drugs) 3 1.5.1 歐洲紫杉醇(Docetaxel) 3 1.5.2 順鉑(Cisplatin) 3 1.5.3 阿黴素、小紅莓(Doxorubicin) 4 1.5.4 5-氟尿嘧啶(5-Fluorouracil, 5-FU) 4 1.5.5 依托泊苷(Etoposide) 4 1.6 研究目標(Specific aims) 4 第二章 實驗材料與方法 6 2.1 細胞株和細胞培養(Cell line & Cell culture) 6 2.2 細胞存活率試驗(MTT assay) 6 2.3 免疫螢光染色(Immunofluorescence staining) 6 2.4 西方墨點法(Western blot) 7 2.5 慢病毒生產(Lentivirus production) 7 2.6 慢病毒轉導(Lentivirus transduction) 8 2.7 單克隆篩選(Single clones selection) 8 2.8 統計分析(Statistical analyses) 8 第三章 結果 9 3.1 Docetaxel對於肺癌細胞存活率的影響 9 3.2 Docetaxel對於肺癌細胞的核仁分布的影響 10 3.3 Cisplatin對於肺癌細胞存活率的影響 11 3.4 Cisplatin對於肺癌細胞的核仁分布的影響 12 3.5 Doxorubicin對於肺癌細胞存活率的影響 12 3.6 Doxorubicin對於肺癌細胞的核仁分布的影響 13 3.7 5-FU對於肺癌細胞存活率的影響 13 3.8 5-FU對於肺癌細胞的核仁分布的影響 14 3.9 Etoposide對於肺癌細胞存活率的影響 15 3.10 Etoposide對於肺癌細胞的核仁分布的影響 16 3.11 在微氧環境下PC9細胞的核仁分布 16 3.12 確認化療藥物對於H1299細胞的蛋白表現 16 3.13 確認化療藥物對於PC9細胞的蛋白表現 17 第四章 結論與討論 18 第五章 參考資料 21 第六章 圖次 28 第七章 附錄 59 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | SP110 | - |
| dc.subject | 核仁 | - |
| dc.subject | 核仁轉位 | - |
| dc.subject | 化療藥物 | - |
| dc.subject | 細胞存活率 | - |
| dc.subject | SP110 | - |
| dc.subject | Nucleolus | - |
| dc.subject | Nucleolar translocation | - |
| dc.subject | Anti-cancer chemotherapy drugs | - |
| dc.subject | Cell viability | - |
| dc.title | SP110核蛋白的核仁轉位對化療藥物的影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The effect of nucleolar translocation of SP110 nuclear protein on anti-cancer chemotherapy drugs | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 114-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蘇剛毅;詹世鵬 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | KANG-YI SU;SHIH-PENG CHAN | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | SP110,核仁核仁轉位化療藥物細胞存活率 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | SP110,NucleolusNucleolar translocationAnti-cancer chemotherapy drugsCell viability | en |
| dc.relation.page | 62 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202600457 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2026-01-30 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物化學暨分子生物學研究所 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | N/A | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 生物化學暨分子生物學科研究所 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-114-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 5.21 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
