Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 生物科技研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/102037
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor游舒涵zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorShu-Han Yuen
dc.contributor.author黎天龍zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorThien-Long Leen
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-12T16:06:32Z-
dc.date.available2026-03-13-
dc.date.copyright2026-03-12-
dc.date.issued2026-
dc.date.submitted2026-02-23-
dc.identifier.citationAkoya Biosciences. (2020). Opal multiplex immunohistochemistry assay development guide and image acquisition information. https://www.akoyabio.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Opal-Reagents_Brochure_Opal-Assay-Development-Guide.pdf
Anderson, A. C., Joller, N., and Kuchroo, V. K. (2016). Lag-3, Tim-3, and TIGIT: Co-inhibitory receptors with specialized functions in immune regulation. Immunity, 44(5), 989-1004.
Benjamini, Y., and Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289-300.
Binnewies, M., Roberts, E. W., Kersten, K., et al. (2018). Understanding the tumor immune microenvironment for effective therapy. Nature Medicine, 24(5), 541-550.
Blise, K. E., Sivagnanam, S., Banik, G. L., et al. (2022). Single cell spatial architectures associated with clinical outcome in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. NPJ Precision Oncology, 6(1), 10.
Burtness, B., Harrington, K. J., Greil, R., et al. (2019). Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE 048): a randomised, open label, phase 3 study. The Lancet, 394(10212), 1915-1928.
Cheng, F. C., Chen, J. H., Wang, Y. C., et al. (2023). Morbidity and mortality of oral cancer in Taiwan. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, 122(10), 1097-1106.
Cillo, A. R., Kürten, C. H. L., Tabib, T., et al. (2020). Immune landscape of viral and carcinogen driven head and neck cancer. Immunity, 52(1), 183-199.e9.
Colevas, A. D., Cmelak, A. J., Pfister, D. G., et al. (2025). NCCN Guidelines Insights: Head and neck cancers, Version 2.2025. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 23(2), 2-11.
Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 34(2), 187-220.
Ferris, R. L., Blumenschein, G., Fayette, J., et al. (2016). Nivolumab for recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. New England Journal of Medicine, 375(19), 1856-1867.
Fridman, W. H., Pagès, F., Sautès-Fridman, C., and Galon, J. (2012). The immune contexture in human tumours: impact on clinical outcome. Nature Reviews Cancer, 12(4), 298-306.
Galon, J., Mlecnik, B., Bindea, G., et al. (2014). Towards the introduction of the Immunoscore in the classification of malignant tumours. Journal of Pathology, 232(2), 199-209.
Harrington, K. J., Burtness, B., Greil, R., et al. (2023). Pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: updated results of the phase 3 KEYNOTE 048 study. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 41(4), 790-802.
Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan. (2022, updated 2024). Betel Quid Prevention Day on December 3 No betel quid regular oral cancer screening. https://www.hpa.gov.tw/EngPages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=1051&pid=16549
Huard, B., Prigent, P., Tournier, M., Bruniquel, D., and Triebel, F. (1997). CD4 major histocompatibility complex class II interaction analyzed with CD4 and LAG-3 immunoglobulin fusion proteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94(11), 5744-5749.
IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. (2004). Betel quid and areca nut chewing and some areca nut derived nitrosamines. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 85, 1-334.
Johnston, R. J., Comps-Agrar, L., Hackney, J., et al. (2014). The immunoreceptor TIGIT regulates antitumor and antiviral CD8⁺ T cell effector function. Cancer Cell, 26(6), 923-937.
Joller, N., Anderson, A. C., and Kuchroo, V. K. (2024). LAG-3, TIM-3, and TIGIT: distinct functions in immune regulation. Immunity, 57(2), 206-222.
Joyce, J. A., and Fearon, D. T. (2015). T cell exclusion, immune privilege, and the tumor microenvironment. Science, 348(6230), 74-80.
Kaplan, E. L., and Meier, P. (1958). Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53(282), 457-481.
Keir, M. E., Butte, M. J., Freeman, G. J., and Sharpe, A. H. (2008). PD-1 and its ligands in tolerance and immunity. Annual Review of Immunology, 26, 677-704.
Keren, L., Bosse, M., Marquez, D., et al. (2018). A structured tumor immune microenvironment in triple negative breast cancer revealed by multiplexed ion beam imaging. Cell, 174(6), 1373-1387.e19.
Ko, Y. C., Huang, Y. L., Lee, C. H., Chen, M. J., Lin, L. M., and Tsai, C. C. (1995). Betel quid chewing, cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption related to oral cancer in Taiwan. Journal of Oral Pathology and Medicine, 24(10), 450-453.
Lee, C. H., Ko, Y. C., Huang, H. L., et al. (2003). The precancer risk of betel quid chewing, tobacco use and alcohol consumption in oral leukoplakia and oral submucous fibrosis in southern Taiwan. British Journal of Cancer, 88(3), 366-372.
Leemans, C. R., Snijders, P. J. F., and Brakenhoff, R. H. (2018). The molecular landscape of head and neck cancer. Nature Reviews Cancer, 18(5), 269-282.
McLane, L. M., Abdel-Hakeem, M. S., and Wherry, E. J. (2019). CD8 T cell exhaustion during chronic viral infection and cancer. Annual Review of Immunology, 37, 457-495.
Monney, L., Sabatos, C. A., Gaglia, J. L., et al. (2002). Th1-specific cell surface protein Tim-3 regulates macrophage activation and severity of an autoimmune disease. Nature, 415(6871), 536-541.
Montero, P. H., and Patel, S. G. (2015). Cancer of the oral cavity. Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America, 24(3), 491-508.
Pardoll, D. M. (2012). The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nature Reviews Cancer, 12(4), 252-264.
Parra, E. R., Uraoka, N., Jiang, M., et al. (2017). Validation of multiplex immunofluorescence panels using multispectral microscopy for immune profiling of formalin fixed and paraffin embedded human tumor tissues. Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer, 5, 7.
Peng, R. D. (2011). Reproducible research in computational science. Science, 334(6060), 1226-1227.
Puram, S. V., Tirosh, I., Parikh, A. S., et al. (2017). Single cell transcriptomic analysis of primary and metastatic tumor ecosystems in head and neck cancer. Cell, 171(7), 1611-1624.e24.
Rivera, C. (2015). Essentials of oral cancer. Medicina Oral Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal, 20(6), e698-e705.
Schober, P., Boer, C., and Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 126(5), 1763-1768.
Siegel, R. L., Kratzer, T. B., Giaquinto, A. N., Sung, H., and Jemal, A. (2025). Cancer statistics, 2025. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 75(1), 10-45.
Stack, E. C., Wang, C., Roman, K. A., and Hoyt, C. C. (2014). Multiplexed immunohistochemistry, imaging, and quantitation: a review, with an assessment of tyramide signal amplification, multispectral imaging and multiplex analysis. Methods, 70(1), 46-58.
Tahara, M., Kiyota, N., Yokota, T., et al. (2025). Five year follow up from the randomized phase 3 KEYNOTE 048 study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. (Advance online publication; add volume/issue/pages if available.)
Taiwan Cancer Registry. (2024). Incidence and mortality rates for the top 10 cancers in Taiwan, 2021. https://twcr.tw/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Top-10-cancers-in-Taiwan-2021.pdf
Toth, Z. E., and Mezey, E. (2007). Simultaneous visualization of multiple antigens with tyramide signal amplification using antibodies from the same species. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, 55(6), 545-554.
Tumeh, P. C., Harview, C. L., Yearley, J. H., et al. (2014). PD-1 blockade induces responses by inhibiting adaptive immune resistance. Nature, 515(7528), 568-571.
Wang, J., Sanmamed, M. F., Datar, I., et al. (2019). Fibrinogen-like protein 1 is a major immune inhibitory ligand of LAG-3. Cell, 176(1-2), 334-347.e12.
Warnakulasuriya, S. (2009). Global epidemiology of oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Oral Oncology, 45(4-5), 309-316.
Wen, C. P., Tsai, M. K., Chung, W. S., et al. (2010). Cancer risks from betel quid chewing beyond oral cancer: a multiple site carcinogen when acting with smoking. Cancer Causes and Control, 21(9), 1427-1435.
Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., et al. (2016). The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3, 160018.
World Health Organization. (2003). IARC Monographs Programme finds betel quid and areca nut chewing carcinogenic to humans.
Yang, Y. H., and Liao, C. T. (2024). Oral cancer in Taiwan. Oral Diseases.
Zhu, C., Anderson, A. C., Schubart, A., et al. (2005). The Tim-3 ligand galectin-9 negatively regulates T helper type 1 immunity. Nature Immunology, 6(12), 1245-1252.
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/102037-
dc.description.abstract口腔鱗狀細胞癌 (Oral squamous cell carcinoma, OSCC) 為頭頸部鱗狀細胞癌中主要的亞型。在臺灣,嚼食檳榔是 OSCC 的重要危險因子,使得此疾病於臨床上造成沉重的負擔。然而,晚期OSCC的治療成效目前仍不理想。
傳統上使用的生物標記在預後及治療反應的預測上應用價值有限,其關鍵原因在於這些指標忽略了腫瘤微環境 (Tumor microenvironment, TME) 中免疫細胞的空間分布與結構限制,而這些空間特徵在調控對抗腫瘤免疫反應中扮演重要角色。基於此一限制,本研究建立了一套以組織為基礎、具備空間解析度的量化分析架構,用以評估免疫檢查點特徵 (Immune checkpoint signature, ICS)。透過此方法,我們進一步闡明 T 細胞上 ICS 的表現如何影響其功能狀態,並說明其與 OSCC 免疫治療反應率及臨床預後之間的關聯。
分析公開的單細胞轉錄體定序資料後,我們觀察到在接受免疫治療後,除惡性腫瘤細胞外,CD8⁺ T 細胞與多個免疫檢查點分子 (PD-1、TIGIT、LAG-3與TIM-3) 的表現密度上亦呈現顯著變化。因此,本研究採用多重免疫組織化學染色 (Multiplex immunohistochemistry, mIHC) 結合AI多光譜影像分析,以整合性評估CD8⁺ T 細胞的免疫檢查點特徵。研究主要聚焦於腫瘤免疫微環境中與類耗竭 (exhaustion-like) 狀態相關的抑制性路徑,並以 PanCK 定義腫瘤區域,同時量化腫瘤區域內 CD8⁺ T 細胞上 PD-1、TIGIT、LAG-3 和 TIM-3 的表現。每個樣本擷取 35 至 50 個區域 (Region of interests, ROIs) 進行分析,並整合 inForm 組織分割、單細胞表型分析與 SIMPiE 特徵萃取技術。最終,依據 CD8⁺ T 細胞的檢查點共表現模式,將其分類為不同的檢查點定義表型 (checkpoint-defined phenotypes),並計算其在腫瘤區與間質區中的細胞密度 (cells/mm²)。
為評估免疫細胞的空間組織特徵,本研究採用最近鄰距離分析 (Nearest neighbor distance analysis) ,以量化 CD8⁺ 亞群與腫瘤區域之間的鄰近程度,並特別聚焦於 50 µm 的「活性區域」(Active zone),此區域被認為是細胞之間最可能發生直接交互作用的空間範圍。基線圖譜 (Baseline profiling) 結果顯示,OSCC 的免疫群集呈現出顯著的空間分化特徵,並具有明確且異質的分布模式:部分由免疫檢查點定義的亞群主要侷限於間質區 (Stroma),而另一些亞群則在腫瘤 (Tumor nests) 中呈現較高的盛行率。此種空間異質性顯示,單純依靠細胞總密度作為評估指標,並不足以完整反映腫瘤免疫脈絡。由於不同免疫亞群在腫瘤分艙之間呈現不均勻分布,其與惡性細胞發生直接交互作用的機會可能受到空間限制。
接下來,本研究建立一套以免疫治療反應後存活時間為基準的篩選策略 (Response-anchored screening strategy),以處理 32 種初始檢查點定義表型所帶來的高度複雜性。在包含 18 位 OSCC 患者治療前後配對樣本的探索性隊列中,我們分析免疫亞群密度的治療前後變化量(Δ = Post − Pre)與臨床結果(性別、年齡、整體存活期及 TNM 分期)之間的相關性。此方法使我們得以優先鑑定兩種特定的細胞狀態(命名為ICS #1 與 ICS #2),其在反應者 (Responders) 與無反應者 (Non-responders) 之間呈現最顯著的統計差異。進一步的空間解析結果顯示,在反應者中,這些細胞狀態於接受抗 PD-1 治療後,其密度顯著增加,且在 50 µm 活性區域內呈現較高的空間富集程度;相較之下,無反應者則維持了免疫亞群與腫瘤之間的空間分離模式。這些結果顯示,特定免疫程式與腫瘤邊界之間的空間鄰近性與治療反應相關,並提供了獨立於免疫細胞數量之外的重要資訊。
最後,我們將上述空間特徵整合至一套臨床風險分數模型 (Risk score model,由 實驗室同仁Ho Nguyen Van Tan 開發)。該模型鑑定出一項由三個 ICS 衍生空間特徵構成的預後指標,能利用風險分數,精準對OSCC病人進行整體存活期及治療反應之評估,且該風險分數在排除吸菸史或檳榔暴露等潛在干擾因子後,仍維持穩定的預測效能。綜上所述,本研究建立了一套標準化的空間圖譜分析架構,證實結合免疫表型分析與腫瘤鄰近指標,可為 OSCC 免疫治療的個體化醫療提供具生物學基礎且具臨床可行性的分析工具。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), a major subtype of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, remains a substantial clinical burden in Taiwan where betel quid chewing is a dominant risk factor and treatment outcomes for advanced disease are still poor. Conventional biomarkers often provide limited predictive value, largely because they neglect the spatial topographies and structural constraints within the tumor microenvironment (TME) that fundamentally orchestrate antitumor immunity. The present study addresses this gap by developing a spatially resolved, tissue-based framework to quantify and evaluate the immune checkpoint signature (ICS). We demonstrate how ICS expression on T cells modulates their functional state, thereby influencing immunotherapy response rates and clinical outcomes in OSCC.
Motivated by analyses of two publicly available single-cell RNA-sequencing datasets, we observed that, in addition to malignant tumor cells, CD8⁺ T cells exhibited significant density changes of four immune checkpoint molecules PD-1, TIGIT, LAG-3, and TIM-3 following immunotherapy treatment. Based on these findings, we employed multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) combined with AI-assisted multispectral imaging to evaluate a focused immune checkpoint panel on CD8⁺ T cells. Specifically, we quantified the expression of PD-1, TIGIT, LAG-3, and TIM-3 on CD8⁺ T cells within PanCK-defined tumor compartments, targeting key inhibitory axes associated with exhaustion-like states in the TME. Between 35 and 50 regions of interest (ROIs) per sample were acquired via multispectral imaging and processed through a standardized pipeline utilizing inForm-based tissue segmentation and single-cell phenotyping, followed by SIMPiE-based feature extraction. CD8⁺ T cells were stratified into checkpoint defined phenotypes based on co-expression patterns, quantified as compartment-resolved densities (cells/mm²) in tumor and stroma.
To evaluate the spatial organization of these immune cells, we employed nearest-neighbor distance analysis to quantify the proximity of CD8⁺ subsets to tumor regions, specifically focusing on a 50 µm active zone where cellular interactions are most likely to occur. Our baseline profiling demonstrated that the OSCC immune landscape is significantly compartmentalized, characterized by distinct distribution patterns where certain checkpoint defined subsets are predominantly restricted to the stroma while others exhibit higher prevalence within tumor nests. This spatial heterogeneity underscores that total cell density alone cannot fully capture the immune context, as the disproportionate distribution of specific subsets between compartments may limit their potential for direct interaction with malignant cells.
A central contribution of this study is the response-anchored screening strategy implemented to navigate the complexity of the 32 initial checkpoint defined phenotypes. Utilizing a discovery cohort of 18 OSCC patients with paired Pre- and Post-immunotherapy (IO) samples, we performed correlation analyses between clinical outcomes including sex, age, overall survival, and TNM stage and the dynamic shifts in immune subsets, calculated as the delta (Post-Pre) change in density. This approach allowed us to prioritize two specific cell states (ICS #1 and ICS #2) that exhibited the most significant statistical divergence between responders and non-responders. Further spatial interrogation revealed that in responding patients, these nominated states significantly increased in density and became more concentrated within the 50 µm active zone following anti-PD-1 therapy. Conversely, non-responders maintained a pattern of spatial separation between these immune subsets and the tumor. These findings demonstrate that the physical proximity of specific immune programs to the tumor margin is a critical dimension of therapeutic response that provides information independent of simple cell abundance.
Finally, we integrated these spatial features into a clinical risk score model (developed by Ho Nguyen Van Tan). This framework identified a compact signature of three ICS-derived features that accurately stratified overall survival and treatment response in both discovery and independent validation cohorts. Notably, this risk score maintained its prognostic value regardless of smoking history or betel nut exposure. Collectively, this study establishes a standardized spatial profiling framework, demonstrating that combining immune phenotyping with tumor-proximity metrics provides a biologically grounded and clinically actionable tool for personalizing immunotherapy in OSCC.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2026-03-12T16:06:32Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2026-03-12T16:06:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontentsACKNOWLEDGEMENTS i
中文摘要 iii
ABSTRACT vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS ix
LIST OF FIGURES xiv
LIST OF TABLES xvii
ABBREVIATION xviii
Chapter 1. Introduction 1
1.1 Oral squamous cell carcinoma in the HNSCC context 1
1.1.1 Epidemiology and clinical burden 3
1.1.2 Risk factors with emphasis on betel quid chewing 4
1.1.3 Current standard of care and unmet clinical needs 5
1.2 Immunotherapy in OSCC/HNSCC and the biomarker gap 6
1.2.1 Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 outcomes and response heterogeneity 7
1.2.2 Limitations of current biomarkers 8
1.3 The central role of CD8⁺ T cells in antitumor immunity 10
1.3.1 Core effector functions within the tumor microenvironment 12
1.3.2 T cell dysfunction and exhaustion: Relevance to immune checkpoint blockade 13
1.4 Rationale for the selected immune checkpoint panel: PD-1, TIGIT, LAG-3, and TIM-3 15
1.4.1 PD-1 axis: Ligands, inhibitory signaling, and relevance to PD-1 blockade 15
1.4.2 TIGIT axis: CD226 competition, ligand distribution, and inhibitory balance 16
1.4.3 LAG-3 axis: MHC class II and tumor associated ligands in T cell restraint 17
1.4.4 TIM-3 axis: Stage associated expression and regulation in chronic stimulation 17
1.4.5 Design rationale for a compact multiplex panel 18
1.5 Significance of spatial topography in the tumor immune microenvironment 19
1.5.1 Immune compartmentalization and functional implications 19
1.5.2 Tumor proximity as a determinant of effector function 20
1.6 Transcriptomic evidence motivating the spatial profiling strategy 21
1.6.1 Single-cell transcriptomic insights into checkpoint programs 22
1.6.2 Addressing spatial gaps through multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) 26
1.7 Thesis rationale and structural overview 27
Chapter 2. Specific aims and hypothesis 30
2.1 Overall hypothesis 30
2.2 Overview of study design and cohorts 31
2.3 Specific aims: Baseline profiling, therapy-induced remodeling, and spatial metrics 33
2.4 Expected outcomes and clinical significance 35
Chapter 3. Materials and methods 38
3.1 Patient cohorts, specimens, and clinical annotation 38
3.2 Tissue processing and multiplex immunohistochemistry panel design 39
3.2.1 Sectioning, controls, and batch design 40
3.2.2 Antibody selection and marker rationale 40
3.3 Opal TSA multiplex immunohistochemistry protocol 41
3.4 Multispectral imaging acquisition and quality control 46
3.4.1 Spectral library generation and unmixing 46
3.4.2 Criteria for image quality assessment 46
3.5 The inForm workflow: Tissue segmentation and single-cell phenotyping 47
3.5.1 Tumor masking and compartment definition 49
3.5.2 Cell segmentation and phenotype classification rules 49
3.5.3 Quality assurance for segmentation and phenotyping 50
3.6 SIMPiE feature extraction and data standardization 51
3.6.1 Output standardization and naming conventions 51
3.6.2 Machine learning-based signal thresholding 54
3.6.3 Definition of tumor-to-stroma ratio 55
3.7 Spatial distance analysis 56
3.7.1 Definition of nearest neighbor distance metrics 56
3.7.2 Strategy for region of interest (ROI) selection 59
3.7.3 Tumor proximity summaries and the 50 µm zone definition 59
3.8 Statistical analysis 60
3.8.1 Paired comparisons (Pre- vs. Post-IO) 60
3.8.2 Group comparisons 61
3.8.3 Survival analysis framework 61
3.8.4 Correlation analysis 62
3.8.5 Strategy for response-associated feature screening and nomination 62
3.9 Software, reproducibility, and data availability 64
3.10 Declaration of use of generative AI tools 65
Chapter 4. Results 66
4.1 Cohort composition and clinical characteristics 66
4.2 In situ identification of checkpoint defined CD8⁺ phenotypes 68
4.3 Baseline landscape of compartment-resolved immune phenotypes 71
4.4 Therapy-associated immune remodeling in paired Pre- and Post-IO specimens 73
4.5 Clinical associations and nomination of immunotherapy-associated cell states 75
4.6 Tumor proximity analyses: Distance distributions and spatial enrichment 78
4.7 Summary of key findings 84
Chapter 5. Discussion 87
5.1 Scope of discussion and overview of findings 87
5.2 Biological significance of checkpoint defined CD8⁺ phenotypes in tissue 89
5.3 Interpretation of therapy-induced remodeling in paired specimens 92
5.4 Rationale for prioritizing ICS #1 and ICS #2 for spatial analysis 94
5.5 The added value of spatial proximity beyond cell density 97
5.6 Integration of immune checkpoint features into a clinical risk stratification framework 99
5.7 Feature selection and modeling for survival-associated risk scoring 101
5.8 Risk score stratification, response association, and confounder assessment 104
5.9 Limitations and future directions for validation 108
Chapter 6. Conclusion 110
References 114
Appendices 120
-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject口腔鱗狀細胞癌-
dc.subject腫瘤免疫微環境-
dc.subject空間解析/空間免疫學-
dc.subjectCD8⁺ T 細胞-
dc.subjectPD-1 阻斷治療/抗 PD-1 治療-
dc.subject多重免疫組織化學(mIHC)/多重免疫螢光染色-
dc.subject多光譜影像-
dc.subject免疫檢查點-
dc.subjectOral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC)-
dc.subjectTumor immune microenvironment-
dc.subjectSpatial profiling / spatial immunology-
dc.subjectCD8⁺ T cells-
dc.subjectImmune checkpoints-
dc.subjectPD-1 blockade / anti–PD-1 therapy-
dc.subjectMultiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC)-
dc.subjectMultispectral imaging-
dc.title口腔鱗狀細胞癌免疫微環境的空間特徵、多重免疫組織化學與多光譜影像分析zh_TW
dc.titleSpatial Profiling of the Immune Microenvironment in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Insights from Multiplex Immunohistochemistry and Multispectral Imagingen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear114-1-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee林劭品;謝佳訓;黃威凱zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeShau-Ping Lin;Chia-Hsun Hsieh;Wei-Kai Huangen
dc.subject.keyword口腔鱗狀細胞癌,腫瘤免疫微環境空間解析/空間免疫學CD8⁺ T 細胞PD-1 阻斷治療/抗 PD-1 治療多重免疫組織化學(mIHC)/多重免疫螢光染色多光譜影像免疫檢查點zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordOral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC),Tumor immune microenvironmentSpatial profiling / spatial immunologyCD8⁺ T cellsImmune checkpointsPD-1 blockade / anti–PD-1 therapyMultiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC)Multispectral imagingen
dc.relation.page136-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202600383-
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)-
dc.date.accepted2026-02-23-
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept生物科技研究所-
dc.date.embargo-lift2031-01-21-
顯示於系所單位:生物科技研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-114-1.pdf
  此日期後於網路公開 2031-01-21
8.89 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved