請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101840完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 連豊力 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Feng-Li Lian | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 林靖 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Ching Lin | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-03-04T17:00:21Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-03-05 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2026-03-04 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2026-02-11 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | [1: 賴淑敏and張梓嘉2024]賴淑敏and張梓嘉.“衛福部估長照需求近90萬人25歲以下居服員僅占3%.”chinese. (2024), [Online]. Available: https://news.pts.org.tw/article/726945.
[2: AnkeCare ]AnkeCare. “長照人力不足?「cp值才是關鍵」.”(),[Online].Available:https://www.ankecare.com/event/25-17229. [3: I-chia ]LeeI-chia.“Carehotlinehelpingthousands.”chinese.(),[Online].Available:https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2024/07/16/2003820877. [4: 財團法人伊甸社會福利基金會]財團法人伊甸社會福利基金會.“伊甸身心障礙照顧者心聲調查心理精神壓力指數高達九成五.”chinese. (), [Online]. Available: https://www.cna.com.tw/postwrite/chi/348096. [5: Nandagopal and Mukherjee 2006]Nandagopal and Ranjan Mukherjee, “Pushing and Steering Wheelchairs using a Holonomic Mobile Robot with a Single Arm,” in 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing, China: IEEE, Oct. 2006,pp.5781–5785,ISBN:978-1-4244-0258-8978-1-4244-0259-5.DOI:10.1109/IROS.2006.282387. [6: Schulze et al. 2023]Martin Schulze, Friedrich Graaf, Lea Steffen, Arne Roennau, and Rüdiger Dillmann,“ATrajectoryPlannerForMobileRobotsSteeringNon-HolonomicWheelchairs In Dynamic Environments,” in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics andAutomation(ICRA),London,UnitedKingdom:IEEE,May29,2023,pp.36423648, ISBN: 979-8-3503-2365-8. DOI: 10.1109/ICRA48891.2023.10161082.doi:DOI Number 93 [7: Dai et al. 2024]Cunxi Dai, Xiaohan Liu, Roberto Shu, and Ralph Hollis, “Wheelchair Maneuvering with a Single-Spherical-Wheeled Balancing Mobile Manipulator,” in 2024 IEEE/RSJInternational Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates: IEEE, Oct. 14, 2024, pp. 6583–6589, ISBN: 979-83503-7770-5. DOI: 10.1109/IROS58592.2024.10802600. [8: Rondoni et al. 2024]Cristiana Rondoni, Francesco Scotto Di Luzio, Christian Tamantini, Nevio Luigi Tagliamonte, Marcello Chiurazzi, Gastone Ciuti, and Loredana Zollo, “Navigation benchmarking for autonomous mobile robots in hospital environment,” Scientific Reports, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 18334, Aug. 7, 2024, ISSN: 2045-2322. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-69040-z. [9: Johansen ]Tor A Johansen, “Introduction to Nonlinear Model Predictive Control and Moving Horizon Estimation [10: Rawlings et al. 2017]James Blake Rawlings, David Q. Mayne, and Moritz Diehl, Model Predictive Control: Theory, Computation, and Design, 2nd edition. Madison, Wisconsin: Nob Hill Publishing, 2017, 623 pp., ISBN: 978-0-9759377-3-0. [11: 社會中心]社會中心.“輪椅阿公「醫院失速片」瘋傳失手滑出當眾2車激烈碰碰樂網看愣頂級看護.”chinese. (), [Online]. Available: https://sport.ftvnews.com.tw/news/detail/2025807W0454. [12: Aguilera et al. 2023]Sergio Aguilera, Muhammad Ali Murtaza, Jonathan Rogers, and Seth Hutchinson,Modeling and Inertial Parameter Estimation of Cart-like Nonholonomic Systems Using a Mobile Manipulator,” in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), London, United Kingdom: IEEE, May 2023, pp. 30733079, ISBN: 979-8-3503-2365-8. DOI: 10.1109/ICRA48891.2023.10161076.doi:DOI Number94 [13: Medola et al. 2014]Fausto O. Medola, Phuc V. Dao, Jayme J. Caspall, and Stephen Sprigle, “Partitioning Kinetic Energy During Freewheeling Wheelchair Maneuvers,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 326333,Mar.2014,ISSN:1534-4320,15580210.DOI:10.1109/TNSRE.2013.2289378. [14: Leboutet et al. 2021]QuentinLeboutet,JulienRoux,AlexandreJanot,JulioRogelioGuadarrama-Olvera,and Gordon Cheng, “Inertial Parameter Identification in Robotics: A Survey,” Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 9, p. 4303, May 2021, ISSN: 2076-3417. DOI: 10.3390/app11094303. [15: Baillieul et al. 2008]J. Baillieul, A.M. Bloch, P. Crouch, and J. Marsden, Nonholonomic Mechanics and Control (Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics). Springer New York, 2008, ISBN:978-0-387-21644-7. [16: Nascimento et al. 2018]Tiago P. Nascimento, Carlos E. T. Dórea, and Luiz Marcos G. Gonçalves, “Nonholonomic mobile robots’ trajectory tracking model predictive control: A survey,”Robotica, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 676–696, May 2018, ISSN: 0263-5747, 1469-8668. DOI:10.1017/S0263574717000637. [17: Schwenzer et al. 2021]Max Schwenzer, Muzaffer Ay, Thomas Bergs, and Dirk Abel, “Review on model predictive control: An engineering perspective,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 117, no. 5-6, pp. 1327–1349, Nov. 2021,ISSN: 0268-3768, 1433-3015. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-021-07682-3. [18: Park et al. 1999]KyuCheol Park, Hakyoung Chung, and Jang Gyu Lee, “Point stabilization of mobile robots via state space exact feedback linearization,” in Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.99CH36288C),vol. 4, 1999, 2626–2631 vol.4. DOI:1109/ROBOT.1999.773993.doi:DOI [19: Cui and Li 2019]DiCuiandHuipingLi,“ModelPredictiveControlofNonholonomicMobileRobotswith Backward Motion,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 52, no. 24, pp. 195–200, 2019,ISSN: 24058963. DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.12.407. [20: Bemporad and Morari 1999]Alberto Bemporad and Manfred Morari, “Control of systems integrating logic, dynamics, and constraints,” Automatica, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 407–427, 1999. [21: Zhang et al. 2021]Yuhao Zhang, Xingwei Zhao, Bo Tao, and Han Ding, “Point Stabilization of Nonholonomic Mobile Robot by Bézier Smooth Subline Constraint Nonlinear Model Predictive Control,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 26, no. 2,pp. 990–1001, Apr. 2021, ISSN: 1083-4435, 1941-014X. DOI: 10.1109/TMECH.2020.3014967. [22: Tang et al. 2024]Jiawei Tang, Shuang Wu, Bo Lan, Yahui Dong, Yuqiang Jin, Guangjian Tian, WenAnZhang,andLingShi,“GMPC:GeometricModelPredictiveControlforWheeled Mobile Robot Trajectory Tracking,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 9,no. 5, pp. 4822–4829, May2024,ISSN:2377-3766,2377-3774. DOI:10.1109/LRA.2024.3381088. [23: Khorshidi et al. 2025]Shahram Khorshidi, Murad Dawood, Benno Nederkorn, Maren Bennewitz, and Majid Khadiv, “Physically-Consistent Parameter Identification of Robots in Contact,” in 2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA),Atlanta, GA, USA: IEEE, May 19, 2025, pp. 677–683, ISBN: 979-8-3315-4139-2.DOI: 10.1109/ICRA55743.2025.11128710. [24: Aguilera and Hutchinson 2023]Sergio Aguilera and Seth Hutchinson, “Control of Cart-Like Nonholonomic Systems Using a Mobile Manipulator,” in 2023 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Detroit, MI, USA: IEEE, Oct. 2023,doi:DOI Number96pp. 6801–6808, ISBN: 978-1-6654-9190-7. DOI: 10.1109/IROS55552.2023.10342088. [25: An et al. 1985]Chae An, Christopher Atkeson, and John Hollerbach, “Estimation of inertial parameters of rigid body links of manipulators,” in 1985 24th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA: IEEE, Dec. 1985, pp. 990–995.DOI: 10.1109/CDC.1985.268648. [26: Heins and Schoellig 2024]Adam Heins and Angela P. Schoellig, “Force Push: Robust Single-Point Pushing With Force Feedback,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 9, no. 8,pp. 6856–6863, Aug. 2024, ISSN: 2377-3766, 2377-3774. DOI: 10.1109/LRA.2024.3414180. [27: Du and Benamar 2020]Wenqian Du and Faïz Benamar, “A compact form dynamics controller for a high DOF tetrapod-on-wheel robot with one manipulator via null space based convex optimization and compatible impedance controllers,” Multibody System Dynamics,vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 447–463, Aug. 2020, ISSN: 1384-5640, 1573-272X. DOI: 10.1007/s11044-020-09728-y. [28: Maybeck 1979]P.S. Maybeck,StochasticModels,Estimation,andControl (MathematicsinScience and Engineering). Academic Press, 1979, ISBN: 978-0-08-096003-6. [29: Simon 2006]D.Simon,OptimalStateEstimation:Kalman,HInfinity,andNonlinearApproaches.Wiley, 2006, ISBN: 978-0-470-04533-6. [30: Novel et al. 1991]Brigitte Novel, Georges Bastin, and G. Campion, “Modelling and control of nonholonomic wheeled mobile robots,” May 1991, 1130–1135 vol.2. DOI: 10.1109/ROBOT.1991.131747.doi:DOI Number97 [31: Siegwart et al. 2011]Roland Siegwart, Illah R. Nourbakhsh, and Davide Scaramuzza, Introduction to Autonomous Mobile Robots, 2nd. Cambridge University Press, 2011. [32: Simpkins 2012]Alex Simpkins, “System identification: Theory for the user, 2nd edition (ljung,l.; 1999) [on the shelf],” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 19, no. 2,pp. 95–96, 2012. DOI: 10.1109/MRA.2012.2192817. [33: Hjalmarsson 2009]Håkan Hjalmarsson, “System identification of complex and structured systems,”European Journal of Control, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 275–310, 2009, ISSN: 0947-3580.DOI: https://doi.org/10.3166/ejc.15.275-310. [34: Schoukens and Ljung 2019]Johan Schoukens and Lennart Ljung, “Nonlinear system identification: A user oriented road map,” IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 28–99,2019. DOI: 10.1109/MCS.2019.2938121. [35: Wu and Braatz 2025]LiangWuandRichardD.Braatz,“Adirectoptimizationalgorithmforinput-constrainedmpc,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 1366–1373,2025. DOI: 10.1109/TAC.2024.3463529. [36: Ardiani et al. 2021]Fabio Ardiani, Mourad Benoussaad, and Alexandre Janot, “Comparison of Least Squares andInstrumental Variables for Parameters Estimation on Differential Drive MobileRobots,”IFAC-PapersOnLine,vol.54,no.7,pp.310–315,2021,ISSN:24058963.DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.08.377. [37: Fukao et al. 2000]T. Fukao, H. Nakagawa, and N. Adachi, “Adaptive tracking control of a nonholonomic mobile robot,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 16,no. 5, pp. 609–615, 2000. DOI: 10.1109/70.880812.doi:DOI Number98 [38: Ioannou and Sun 2012]Petros A. Ioannou and Jing Sun, Robust Adaptive Control. Dover Publications,2012. [39: Falcone et al. 2007]Paolo Falcone, Francesco Borrelli, Jahan Asgari, Hongtei Eric Tseng, and Davor Hrovat, “Predictive active steering control for autonomous vehicle systems,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 566–580, 2007.DOI: 10.1109/TCST.2007.894653. [40: HOCOM Medical Co., Ltd. 2024]HOCOMMedicalCo.,Ltd.“Manualwheelchairproductspecifications.”Accessed:Jan. 28, 2026. (2024), [Online]. Available: https://www.hocom.com.tw/main/prod_in.aspx?mnuid=7483&modid=21&pcid=156&pscid=39&pscid2=103&prodid=4546 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101840 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 在醫院與照護設施等受限室內環境中,若使用移動式機器手臂操控被動輪椅必須在確保安全的前提下,執行精準且平順的轉向與移動動作。然而,傳統輪椅操控方法多依賴已知或離線辨識之動態參數,並採用分離式的路徑規劃與追蹤控制架構,當系統慣性參數存在不確定性時,往往導致追蹤誤差累積,甚至違反空間與動態限制。此外,僅以追蹤誤差為目標的控制策略通常無法提供足夠的動態激發,使關鍵慣性參數在實際操作中難以被可靠辨識,進而限制自適應控制效能。本論文提出一套具資訊引導之自適應非線性模型預測控制(NMPC)架構,用於處理具不確定慣性參數之非完整約束輪椅系統。首先,本文以受限拉格朗日(constrained Lagrangian)方法推導一個以力為輸入的非線性動態模型。透過顯式消除與非完整約束相關的拉格朗日乘子,進一步得到一個 NMPC 預測的投影動態模型。接著,利用延伸卡爾曼濾波器(EKF),對未知慣性參數進行線上估測。為克服傳統追蹤式控制在激發不足下所面臨的基本限制,本文於 NMPC 成本函數中引入一項資訊引導之成本項。該成本項透過鼓勵角加速度的產生,主動促進具資訊性的運動行為,進而提升參數可識別性並加速 EKF 的收斂效果。EKF 與 NMPC 被整合於一個統一的遞迴預測回授迴路中,使控制器的預測模型能夠隨著參數估測結果持續更新。所提出的方法透過多種具代表性的模擬情境進行驗證,包括直線追蹤、走廊轉彎以及受限空間操控等案例。與基於回授線性化之 LQR、自適應倒退步進控制(adaptive backstepping control),以及未引入資訊引導激發之傳統 NMPC 相比,模擬結果顯示,本文方法在終點位置追蹤精度、參數收斂速度以及限制條件滿足性方面均展現出明顯優勢,即使在初始參數不確定性顯著的情況下亦能維持穩健表現。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In hospital and care-facility environments with confined indoor spaces, mobile manipulator–assisted control of passive wheelchairs must achieve precise and smooth maneuvering while strictly ensuring operational safety.However, conventional wheelchair control approaches often rely on known or offline-identified dynamic parameters and adopt decoupled planning-and-tracking architectures.When significant uncertainty exists in the inertial parameters, such methods tend to accumulate tracking errors and may even violate spatial and dynamic constraints.Moreover, control strategies that focus solely on tracking performance typically provide insufficient dynamic excitation, making key inertial parameters difficult to identify reliably during operation and thereby limiting the effectiveness of adaptive control.This thesis proposes an information-guided adaptive nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) framework for nonholonomic wheelchair systems with uncertain inertial parameters.First, a force-based nonlinear dynamic model is derived using a constrained Lagrangian formulation.By explicitly eliminating the Lagrange multipliers associated with the nonholonomic constraints, a projected dynamic model suitable for NMPC prediction is obtained.An extended Kalman filter (EKF) is then employed to estimate the unknown inertial parameters online.To overcome the fundamental limitation of insufficient excitation in conventional tracking-based control, an information-aware cost term is incorporated into the NMPC formulation.This cost explicitly promotes informative motions by encouraging angular acceleration, thereby enhancing parameter identifiability and accelerating EKF convergence.The EKF and NMPC are integrated within a unified receding-horizon feedback loop, allowing the prediction model to be continuously updated using the estimated parameters.The proposed approach is evaluated through multiple representative simulation scenarios, including straight-line tracking, corridor turning, and confined-space maneuvering.Comparisons with feedback-linearization-based LQR, adaptive backstepping control, and conventional NMPC without information-aware excitation demonstrate that the proposed method achieves superior terminal position tracking accuracy, faster parameter convergence, and improved constraint satisfaction, even under significant initial parameter uncertainty.The results confirm the effectiveness of integrating excitation-aware estimation objectives directly into the NMPC framework for safe and reliable wheelchair motion in constrained environments. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2026-03-04T17:00:21Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2026-03-04T17:00:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝i
摘要iii ABSTRACT v CONTENTS vii LIST OF FIGURES xi LIST OF TABLES xiii Denotation xv Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.2 Problem Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 1.2.1 Parameter Estimation (EKF Stage) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 1.2.2 Physical Interpretation of Inertial Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 1.2.3 Constraint-Aware Control (MPC Stage) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 1.3 Contribution of the Thesis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 1.4 Organization of the Thesis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Chapter 2 Literature Review 13 2.1 Parameter Estimation and System Identification . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Chapter 3 Preliminaries and Related Algorithms 19 3.1 System Kinematic Model and Nonholonomic Constraints . . . . . . . 19 3.1.1 State Vector of Wheelchair Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 3.2 Nonholonomic Dynamic Model and Elimination of the Lagrange Multiplier. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 3.2.1 A. Solving for λ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 3.2.2 B. Substituting λ and Identifying the Projection Operator . . . . . 22 3.2.3 C. Eliminating λ by Left-Multiplying the Original Model . . . . . 23 3.2.4 Input Vector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 3.2.5 Nonholonomic Constraints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 3.2.6 Dynamic Model Derivation (Lagrangian Formulation) . . . . . . . 26 3.3 System Identification via Extended Kalman Filter . . . . . . . . . . . 31 3.3.1 Extended Kalman Filter Formulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 3.3.2 Parameter Convergence Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 3.4 Nonlinear Model Predictive Control Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 3.4.1 Control Objective . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 3.4.2 Discrete-Time Formulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 3.4.3 Numerical Solution Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 3.4.4 Receding Horizon Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 Chapter 4 Proposed Key Theory and Algorithms 37 4.1 System Modeling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 4.2 Information-Driven Excitation for Parameter Convergence . . . . . . 38 4.2.1 General Formulation: Parameter Sensitivity and Fisher Information 39 4.2.2 Wheelchair Model Derivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 4.3 Information Cost Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 4.3.1 Information Weight Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 4.3.2 Non-Convexity and Convergence Considerations . . . . . . . . . . 45 4.3.3 Safety Constraint Check . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 4.4 Unified EKF–NMPC Feedback Loop Integration . . . . . . . . . . . 46 Chapter 5 Simulation and Results 51 5.1 Dynamic Model and Simulation Assumptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 5.2 Compared Control Strategies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 5.2.1 LQR with Feedback Linearization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 5.2.2 Adaptive Backstepping Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 5.2.3 Nonlinear Model Predictive Control without Adaptation . . . . . . 54 5.2.4 Proposed Adaptive NMPC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 5.3 Scenario Definition and Reference Trajectory Design . . . . . . . . . 55 5.3.1 Straight-Line Reference Trajectory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 5.3.2 Circular Reference Trajectory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 5.3.3 Corridor Turning Reference Trajectory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 5.3.4 Confined Circular Reference Trajectory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 5.4 Initial Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 5.4.1 Reference-Based Perturbation Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 5.4.2 Corridor Feasibility and Boundary Margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 5.4.3 Circular and Confined-Space Initial Pose Sampling . . . . . . . . 60 5.5 Parameter Initialization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 5.6 Evaluation Metrics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 5.6.1 Position Tracking Accuracy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 5.6.2 Heading Tracking Accuracy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 5.6.3 Control Effort . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 5.6.4 Task Success Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 5.7 Baseline Controllers and Verification Under Accurate Parameters . . 66 5.7.1 Baseline 1: Feedback Linearization with LQR (FL+LQR) . . . . . 66 5.7.2 Baseline 2: Standard NMPC Without Information Terms . . . . . . 67 5.7.3 Illustrative Results (Accurate Model) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 5.8 Tracking Performance under Incorrect Model Parameters . . . . . . . 68 5.9 Adaptive Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 5.9.1 Scenario 1: Straight Corridor Tracking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 5.9.2 Scenario 2: Corridor Turning (90-Degree Corner) . . . . . . . . . 79 5.9.3 Scenario 3: Circular Path . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 5.9.4 Information-Guided Input Excitation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 5.10 Robustness of difference initial position . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 5.11 Overall Discussion and Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 Chapter 6 Conclusions and Future Works 89 6.1 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 6.2 Future Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 References 93 Appendix A Effect of Excitation on Parameter Estimation 101 Appendix B The Mass and Damping Parameters 105 B.1 Dynamic Model Parameterization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 B.2 Jacobian of the Mass Matrix with Respect to the Total Mass . . . . . 105 B.3 Jacobian of the Coriolis Matrix with Respect to the Total Mass . . . . 106 B.4 Implication for Mass Identifiability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 B.5 Jacobian of the Mass Matrix with Respect to the Damping Coefficient 108 B.6 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject | 非完整約束 | - |
| dc.subject | 非線性模型預測控制 | - |
| dc.subject | 參數估測 | - |
| dc.subject | Nonholonomic constraint | - |
| dc.subject | NMPC | - |
| dc.subject | Parameter Estimation | - |
| dc.title | 具資訊引導之非線性模型預測控制於非完整約束輪椅操控與線上參數估測 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Information-Guided Nonlinear Model Predictive Control for Nonholonomic Wheelchair Maneuvering with Online Parameter Estimation | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 114-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 簡忠漢;李後燦 ;黃正民 ;江明理 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Jong-Hann Jean;Hou-Tsan Lee;Cheng-Ming Huang;Ming-Li Chiang | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 非完整約束,非線性模型預測控制參數估測 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Nonholonomic constraint,NMPCParameter Estimation | en |
| dc.relation.page | 109 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202600724 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2026-02-11 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 電機資訊學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 電機工程學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2026-03-05 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 電機工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-114-1.pdf | 4.91 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
