請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101811完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳中明 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Chung-Ming Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 殷語芊 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu-Qian Yin | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-03-04T16:45:32Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-03-05 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2026-03-04 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2026-02-04 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | [1] “Data Page: Leading causes of death,” part of the following publication: Saloni Dattani, Fiona Spooner, Hannah Ritchie and Max Roser (2023) – “Causes of Death.”Data adapted from IHME, Global Burden of Disease. Retrieved from https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/leadingm cause-of-death [online resource]
[2] “Data Page: The top 10 causes of death,” part of the following publication: World Economic Forum (2021) – “The top 10 causes of death.” Data adapted from WHO, Global Health Estimates. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/stories/2021/02/top-10-global-causes death [online resource] [3] Hajar, R. (2017). Risk factors for coronary artery disease: historical perspectives. Heart views, 18(3), 109-114. [4] Vliegenthart, R., Oudkerk, M., Hofman, A., Oei, H. H. S., van Dijck, W., van Rooij, F. J., & Witteman, J. C. (2005). Coronary calcification improves cardiovascular risk prediction in the elderly. Circulation, 112(4), 572-577. [5] Liu, W., Zhang, Y., Yu, C. M., Ji, Q. W., Cai, M., Zhao, Y. X., & Zhou, Y. J. (2015). Current understanding of coronary artery calcification. Journal of geriatric cardiology: JGC, 12(6), 668. [6] M. J. Budoff, L. J. Shaw, S. T. Liu, et al., “Long-term prognosis associated with coronary calcification: observations from a registry of 25,253 patients,” J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 49(18), 1860–1870 (2007). [7] M. H. Criqui, J. O. Denenberg, J. H. Ix, et al., “Calcium density of coronary artery plaque and risk of incident cardiovascular events,” Jama 311(3), 271–278 (2014). [8] G. S. Mintz et al., “Unstable angina/myocardial infarction/atherosclerosis: patterns of calcification in coronary artery disease a statistical analysis of intravascular ultrasound and coronary angiography in 1155 lesions,” Circulation 91(7), 1959–1965 (1995). [9] Tuzcu, E. M., Berkalp, B., De Franco, A. C., Ellis, S. G., Goormastic, M., Whitlow, P. L., ... & Nissen, S. E. (1996). The dilemma of diagnosing coronary calcification: angiography versus intravascular ultrasound. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 27(4), 832-838. [10] Ma, T., Yu, M., Chen, Z., Fei, C., Shung, K. K., & Zhou, Q. (2015). Multi-frequency intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging. IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 62(1), 97-107. [11] Huang, D., Swanson, E. A., Lin, C. P., Schuman, J. S., Stinson, W. G., Chang, W., ... & Fujimoto, J. G. (1991). Optical coherence tomography. science, 254(5035), 1178-1181. [12] Mintz, G. S. (2015). Intravascular imaging of coronary calcification and its clinical implications. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, 8(4), 461-471. [13] Tajima, A., Bouisset, F., Ohashi, H., Sakai, K., Mizukami, T., Rizzini, M. L., ... & Collet, C. (2024). Advanced CT Imaging for the Assessment of Calcific Coronary Artery Disease and PCI Planning. Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 3(3), 101299. [14] Deng, C., Liu, Z., Zhao, R., & Shi, B. (2025). Intravascular imaging and functional assessment for coronary in-stent restenosis: Current status and future directions. International Journal of Cardiology, 421, 132918. [15] Bezerra, H. G., Costa, M. A., Guagliumi, G., Rollins, A. M., & Simon, D. I. (2009). Intracoronary optical coherence tomography: a comprehensive review: clinical and research applications. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2(11), 1035-1046. [16] Muramatsu, T., Ozaki, Y., Nanasato, M., Ishikawa, M., Nagasaka, R., Ohota, M., ... & MISTIC-1 Investigators. (2020). Comparison between optical frequency domain imaging and intravascular ultrasound for percutaneous coronary intervention guidance in biolimus A9-eluting stent implantation: a randomized MISTIC-1 non-inferiority trial. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, 13(11), e009314. [17] Terashima, M., Kaneda, H., & Suzuki, T. (2012). The role of optical coherence tomography in coronary intervention. The Korean journal of internal medicine, 27(1), 1. [18] Mehanna, E., Bezerra, H. G., Prabhu, D., Brandt, E., Chamié, D., Yamamoto, H., ... & Costa, M. A. (2013). Volumetric characterization of human coronary calcification by frequency-domain optical coherence tomography. Circulation Journal, 77(9), 2334-2340. [19] Fujino, A., Mintz, G. S., Matsumura, M., Lee, T., Kim, S. Y., Hoshino, M., ... & Maehara, A. (2018). A new optical coherence tomography-based calcium scoring system to predict stent underexpansion. EuroIntervention, 13(18), e2182-e2189. [20] G. J. Tearney et al., “Consensus standards for acquisition, measurement, and reporting of intravascular optical coherence tomography studies: A report from the international working group for intravascular optical coherence tomography standardization and validation,” J. Amer. College Cardiol., vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 1058–1072, Mar. 2012. [21] Araki, M., Park, S. J., Dauerman, H. L., Uemura, S., Kim, J. S., Di Mario, C., ... & Jang, I. K. (2022). Optical coherence tomography in coronary atherosclerosis assessment and intervention. Nature Reviews Cardiology, 19(10), 684-703. [22] Hemetsberger, R., Gori, T., Toelg, R., Byrne, R., Allali, A., El-Mawardy, M., ... & Abdel-Wahab, M. (2021). Optical coherence tomography assessment in patients treated with rotational atherectomy versus modified balloons: PREPARE-CALC OCT. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, 14(3), e009819. [23] Mozaffarian, D., Benjamin, E. J., Go, A. S., Arnett, D. K., Blaha, M. J., Cushman, M., ... & Turner, M. B. (2016). Heart disease and stroke statistics—2016 update: a report from the American Heart Association. circulation, 133(4), e38-e360. [24] Abubakar, M., Javed, I., Rasool, H. F., Raza, S., Basavaraju, D., Abdullah, R. M., ... & Hajjaj, M. (2023). Advancements in percutaneous coronary intervention techniques: a comprehensive literature review of mixed studies and practice guidelines. Cureus, 15(7). [25] Tan, K., Sulke, N., Taub, N., & Sowton, E. (1995). Clinical and lesion morphologic determinants of coronary angioplasty success and complications: current experience. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 25(4), 855-865. [26] Hoffmann, R., Mintz, G. S., Popma, J. J., Satler, L. F., Kent, K. M., Pichard, A. D., & Leon, M. B. (1998). Treatment of calcified coronary lesions with Palmaz–Schatz stents: An intravascular ultrasound study. European heart journal, 19(8), 1224-1231. [27] Nobuyoshi, M., Kimura, T., Ohishi, H., Horiuchi, H., Nosaka, H., Hamasaki, N., ... & Kim, K. (1991). Restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: pathologic observations in 20 patients. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 17(2), 433-439. [28] Doi, H., Maehara, A., Mintz, G. S., Yu, A., Wang, H., Mandinov, L., ... & Stone, G. W. (2009). Impact of post-intervention minimal stent area on 9-month follow-up patency of paclitaxel-eluting stents: an integrated intravascular ultrasound analysis from the TAXUS IV, V, and VI and TAXUS ATLAS Workhorse, Long Lesion, and Direct Stent Trials. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2(12), 1269-1275. [29] Wang, X., Matsumura, M., Mintz, G. S., Lee, T., Zhang, W., Cao, Y., ... & Maehara, A. (2017). In vivo calcium detection by comparing optical coherence tomography, intravascular ultrasound, and angiography. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, 10(8), 869-879. [30] Ryan, T. J. Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on assessment of diagnostic and therapeutic cardiovascular procedures (subcommittee on percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty). J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 12(2), 529–545 (1988). [31] Bangalore, S., Vlachos, H. A., Selzer, F., Wilensky, R. L., Kip, K. E., Williams, D. O., & Faxon, D. P. (2011). Percutaneous coronary intervention of moderate to severe calcified coronary lesions: insights from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 77(1), 22-28. [32] Moussa, I., Ellis, S. G., Jones, M., Kereiakes, D. J., McMartin, D., Rutherford, B., ... & Stone, G. W. (2005). Impact of coronary culprit lesion calcium in patients undergoing paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation (a TAXUS-IV sub study). The American journal of cardiology, 96(9), 1242-1247. [33] Farag, M., Costopoulos, C., Gorog, D. A., Prasad, A., & Srinivasan, M. (2016). Treatment of calcified coronary artery lesions. Expert review of cardiovascular therapy, 14(6), 683-690. [34] Kawaguchi, R., Tsurugaya, H., Hoshizaki, H., Toyama, T., Oshima, S., & Taniguchi, K. (2008). Impact of lesion calcification on clinical and angiographic outcome after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in real-world patients. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine, 9(1), 2-8. [35] Mehanna, E., Abbott, J. D., & Bezerra, H. G. (2018). Optimizing percutaneous coronary intervention in calcified lesions: insights from optical coherence tomography of atherectomy. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, 11(5), e006813. [36] Kubo, T., Tanaka, A., Kitabata, H., Ino, Y., Tanimoto, T., & Akasaka, T. (2012). Application of optical coherence tomography in percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation Journal, 76(9), 2076-2083. [37] Prati, F., Di Vito, L., Biondi-Zoccai, G., Occhipinti, M., La Manna, A., Tamburino, C., ... & Albertucci, M. (2012). Angiography alone versus angiography plus optical coherence tomography to guide decision-making during percutaneous coronary intervention: the Centro per la Lotta contro l’Infarto-Optimisation of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CLI-OPCI) study. EuroIntervention, 8(7), 823-829. [38] Lu, H., Gargesha, M., Wang, Z., Chamie, D., Attizzani, G. F., Kanaya, T., ... & Wilson, D. L. (2012). Automatic stent detection in intravascular OCT images using bagged decision trees. Biomedical optics express, 3(11), 2809-2824. [39] Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015, October). U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention (pp. 234-241). Cham: Springer international publishing. [40] Çiçek, Ö., Abdulkadir, A., Lienkamp, S. S., Brox, T., & Ronneberger, O. (2016, October). 3D U-Net: learning dense volumetric segmentation from sparse annotation. In International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention (pp. 424-432). Cham: Springer International Publishing. [41] Wang, Z., Kyono, H., Bezerra, H. G., Wang, H., Gargesha, M., Alraies, C., ... & Rollins, A. M. (2010). Semiautomatic segmentation and quantification of calcified plaques in intracoronary optical coherence tomography images. Journal of biomedical optics, 15(6), 061711-061711. [42] Ughi, G. J., Adriaenssens, T., Sinnaeve, P., Desmet, W., & D’hooge, J. (2013). Automated tissue characterization of in vivo atherosclerotic plaques by intravascular optical coherence tomography images. Biomedical optics express, 4(7), 1014-1030. [43] Athanasiou, L. S., Bourantas, C. V., Rigas, G., Sakellarios, A. I., Exarchos, T. P., Siogkas, P. K., ... & Fotiadis, D. I. (2014). Methodology for fully automated segmentation and plaque characterization in intracoronary optical coherence tomography images. Journal of biomedical optics, 19(2), 026009-026009. [44] Huang, Y., He, C., Wang, J., Miao, Y., Zhu, T., Zhou, P., & Li, Z. (2018). Intravascular optical coherence tomography image segmentation based on support vector machine algorithm. MCB Molecular and Cellular Biomechanics, 15(2), 117-125. [45] Badrinarayanan, V., Kendall, A., & Cipolla, R. (2017). Segnet: A deep convolutional encoder-decoder architecture for image segmentation. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 39(12), 2481-2495. [46] Chen, L. C., Zhu, Y., Papandreou, G., Schroff, F., & Adam, H. (2018). Encoder-decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV) (pp. 801-818). [47] Gharaibeh, Y., Prabhu, D., Kolluru, C., Lee, J., Zimin, V., Bezerra, H., & Wilson, D. (2019). Coronary calcification segmentation in intravascular OCT images using deep learning: application to calcification scoring. Journal of Medical Imaging, 6(4), 045002-045002. [48] Lee, J., Prabhu, D., Kolluru, C., Gharaibeh, Y., Zimin, V. N., Bezerra, H. G., & Wilson, D. L. (2019). Automated plaque characterization using deep learning on coronary intravascular optical coherence tomographic images. Biomedical optics express, 10(12), 6497-6515. [49] Gessert, N., Lutz, M., Heyder, M., Latus, S., Leistner, D. M., Abdelwahed, Y. S., & Schlaefer, A. (2018). Automatic plaque detection in IVOCT pullbacks using convolutional neural networks. IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 38(2), 426-434. [50] He, C., Wang, J., Yin, Y., & Li, Z. (2020). Automated classification of coronary plaque calcification in OCT pullbacks with 3D deep neural networks. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 25(9), 095003-095003. [51] Lee, J., Gharaibeh, Y., Kolluru, C., Zimin, V. N., Dallan, L. A. P., Kim, J. N., ... & Wilson, D. L. (2020). Segmentation of coronary calcified plaque in intravascular OCT images using a two-step deep learning approach. IEEE Access, 8, 225581-225593. [52] Chu, M., Jia, H., Gutierrez-Chico, J. L., Maehara, A., Ali, Z. A., Zeng, X., ... & Tu, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and optical coherence tomography for the automatic characterisation of human atherosclerotic plaques: AI and OCT for plaque characterisation. EuroIntervention,2023,17(1), 41. [53] Wang, Z., Zheng, J., Jiang, P., & Gao, D. (2023). Sk-Conv and SPP-based UNet for lesion segmentation of coronary optical coherence tomography. Technology and Health Care, 31(1_suppl), 347-355. [54] Liu, Y., Nezami, F. R., & Edelman, E. R. (2024). A Transformer-based pyramid network for coronary calcified plaque segmentation in intravascular optical coherence tomography images. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 113, 102347. [55] Oord, A. V. D., Li, Y., & Vinyals, O. (2018). Representation learning with contrastive predictive coding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.03748. [56] Chen, T., Kornblith, S., Norouzi, M., & Hinton, G. (2020, November). A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations. In International conference on machine learning (pp. 1597-1607). PmLR. [57] Wang, X., Zhang, R., Shen, C., Kong, T., & Li, L. (2021). Dense contrastive learning for self-supervised visual pre-training. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 3024-3033). [58] Alonso, I., Sabater, A., Ferstl, D., Montesano, L., & Murillo, A. C. (2021). Semi-supervised semantic segmentation with pixel-level contrastive learning from a class-wise memory bank. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision (pp. 8219-8228). [59] Khosla, P., Teterwak, P., Wang, C., Sarna, A., Tian, Y., Isola, P., ... & Krishnan, D. (2020). Supervised contrastive learning. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33, 18661-18673. [60] Lee, C. E., Chung, M., & Shin, Y. G. (2022). Voxel-level siamese representation learning for abdominal multi-organ segmentation. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 213, 106547. [61] 鄭宇傑 (2022) 。冠狀動脉光學同調斷層掃描影像深度學習斑塊診斷模型之建構。碩士論文,國立臺灣大學醫學院暨工學院醫學工程學系研究所。 [62] Gong, P., Almasian, M., Van Soest, G., De Bruin, D. M., Van Leeuwen, T. G., Sampson, D. D., & Faber, D. J. (2020). Parametric imaging of attenuation by optical coherence tomography: review of models, methods, and clinical translation. Journal of biomedical optics, 25(4), 040901-040901. [63] Prati, F., Jenkins, M. W., Di Giorgio, A., & Rollins, A. M. (2011). Intracoronary optical coherence tomography, basic theory and image acquisition techniques. The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 27(2), 251-258. [64] Dice, L. R. (1945). Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology, 26(3), 297-302. [65] Espis, A., Marzi, C., & Diciotti, S. (2025). Comparative analysis of supervised and self-supervised learning with small and imbalanced medical imaging datasets. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 32345. [66] Subban, V., & Raffel, O. C. (2020). Optical coherence tomography: Fundamentals and clinical utility. Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy, 10(5),1389. [67] Kurogi, K., Ishii, M., Ikebe, S., Kaichi, R., Takae, M., Mori, T., ... & Tsujita, K. (2023). Calcium evaluation using coronary computed tomography in combination with optical coherence tomography. The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 39(9), 1815- 1824. [68] Huang, Z., Sun, J., Shao, Y., Wang, Z., Wang, S., Li, Q., ... & Yu, Q. (2024). PolarFormer: a transformer-based method for multi-lesion segmentation in intravascular OCT. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 43(12), 4190-4199. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101811 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 冠狀動脈鈣化(Coronary Artery Calcium, CAC)與不良臨床預後相關,亦可能影響經皮冠狀動脉介入治療(Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, PCI)之處置策略與手術結果。臨床上,對其範圍與嚴重程度之辨識與量化具有重要價值。血管內光學同調斷層掃描(Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography, IVOCT)可提供高解析度影像導引,然而單次 Pullback 之影像量龐大,且逐幀人工標注成本高,使得即時且一致的全面評估難以達成。因此,冠狀動脉斑塊的自動化分析方法具有重要的臨床應用價值。
本研究旨在建立冠狀動脈OCT影像之鈣化斑塊自動分割方法,以降低逐幀人工標注負擔,並支援後續臨床量化分析與治療規劃。研究資料依病患爲單位分為訓練、驗證與測試資料集,訓練集包含 125 名病患,驗證集與測試集各 6 名病患;對應影像幀數分別為 31,967、1,499 與 1,482幀。 方法上,本研究以監督式學習之三維 U 形網路(3D U-Net)作爲分割骨幹,引入了體素層級的對比式學習(Voxel-level Contrastive Learning),用於在冠狀動脉光學同調斷層掃描(OCT)影像中分割冠狀動脉鈣化。針對鈣化病灶呈小體積或薄片狀與類別嚴重不平衡所導致之漏檢與邊界不穩定問題,該對比式分支以標注爲依據定義正負樣本關係,直接在特徵空間强化鈣化與背景之可分離性,以期實現局部細緻分割,並降低漏檢風險。此外,本研究引入類別導向之伫列式記憶庫以累積跨批次特徵,藉此擴充可用樣本對並降低小批次取樣偏差,使樣本集合可隨訓練歷程持續更新。另爲避免負樣本集合被大量且易區分的背景所主導,進而稀釋對比學習的有效訊號,本研究採用困難負樣本挖掘結合隨機抽樣的混合策略,以實現聚焦於易混淆背景的同時兼顧背景多樣性之維持。 結果顯示,體素層級的對比式學習結合3D U-Net的方式在冠狀動脈OCT影像之鈣化斑塊分割中呈現良好效能表現,相較於3D U-Net基礎模型,本研究方法取得穩定但幅度有限之提升,達到 Dice 係數(Dice Coefficient, DSC)0.8383±0.0127 ,交並比(Intersection-over-union, IoU)0.7216±0.0109,顯示鈣化斑塊預測區域與人工標注之空間重叠度良好。精確率(Precision)0.8825±0.0134、平衡準確率(Balanced Accuracy, BalAcc)0.8964±0.0136 與 馬修斯相關係數(Matthews Correlation Coefficient,MCC)爲0.8313±0.0126。值得注意的是,靈敏度達到(Sensitivity;亦即 Recall) 0.7984±0.0121,比之3D U-Net基礎模型上升了1.99%,體現其增加了鈣化之檢出。影像層面之觀察亦指出,本方法對體積較小或薄片狀鈣化病灶能提供較穩定之分割邊界。 綜合而言,本研究提出之體素層級監督式對比式學習,透過標注導向的表徵學習機制,提升小目標且嚴重類別不平衡情境下之鈣化分割能力,具有作爲冠狀動脉鈣化量化流程輔助工具之潜力。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Coronary artery calcification (CAC) is associated with adverse clinical outcomes and may influence both procedural strategy and outcomes in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Accurate identification and quantification of CAC extent and severity are therefore clinically important. Intravascular optical coherence tomography (IVOCT) provides high-resolution imaging guidance; however, a single Pullback contains a large number of frames, and frame-by-frame manual annotation is labor-intensive. These factors make real-time, consistent, and comprehensive assessment difficult in routine practice. Consequently, automated analysis of coronary plaque has substantial clinical value.
This study aims to develop an automatic calcified plaque segmentation method for coronary OCT images to reduce the burden of frame-level manual annotation and to support downstream quantitative analysis and treatment planning. The dataset was split at the patient level into training, validation, and test sets. The training set included 125 patients, while the validation and test sets each included 6 patients, corresponding to 31,967, 1,499, and 1,482 frames, respectively. Methodologically, we used a 3D U-Net as the supervised segmentation backbone and incorporated voxel-level contrastive learning to segment calcified plaque in coronary OCT images. To address missed detections and unstable boundaries caused by small-volume or thin, sheet-like lesions and severe class imbalance, the contrastive branch defined positive and negative pairs using manual annotations. This design explicitly increases the separability between calcification and background in feature space, with the goal of improving local, fine-grained segmentation and reducing false negatives. In addition, we introduced a queue-based memory bank with class-aware sampling to accumulate cross-batch embeddings, thereby expanding the pool of available contrastive pairs and alleviating mini-batch sampling bias. To avoid the negative pool being overwhelmed by abundant, easily separable background, which would weaken the contrastive signal, we further adopted a hybrid strategy that combines hard negative mining with random sampling. This approach emphasizes confusing background regions while maintaining background diversity. The proposed method demonstrated strong performance for calcified plaque segmentation in coronary OCT images. Compared with the 3D U-Net base model, it achieved a consistent but modest improvement, reaching a Dice coefficient (DSC) of 0.8383 ± 0.0127 and an intersection-over-union (IoU) of 0.7216±0.0109, indicating good spatial overlap with manual annotations. It also achieved a precision of 0.8825 ± 0.0134, a balanced accuracy (BalAcc) of 0.8964 ± 0.0136, and a Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.8313 ± 0.0126. Notably, sensitivity (Recall) reached 0.7984 ± 0.0121, representing a 1.99% increase over the 3D U-Net baseline and suggesting improved detection of calcified lesions. Qualitative inspection further indicated that the proposed method produced more stable boundaries for small or thin, sheet-like calcifications. In summary, we propose a voxel-level supervised contrastive learning framework that leverages annotation-guided representation learning to improve calcification segmentation under small-target and severely imbalanced conditions. The method shows potential as an assistive tool for coronary calcification quantification workflows. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2026-03-04T16:45:32Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2026-03-04T16:45:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 i
Abstract iii 目次 v 圖次 viii 表次 x 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景 1 1.2 研究目的 3 第二章 文獻回顧 7 2.1 深度學習用於醫學影像分割之相關研究 7 2.2 冠狀動脈光學同調斷層掃描影像分割之相關研究 8 2.3 對比式學習應用於影像分割之相關研究 10 第三章 研究材料與方法 12 3.1 研究材料 12 3.2 驗證方法與資料分配 13 3.3 影像前處理 13 3.3.1管腔面積分割與移除 14 3.3.2 極座標與灰階轉換 15 3.3.3影像增強 17 3.3.4 資料擴增 18 3.3.5 A-line 徑向像素平移對齊 19 3.3.6導絲陰影移除 20 3.3.7 VOI 堆疊 22 3.4 3D U-Net之基礎分割模型 23 3.4.1 損失函數 23 3.4.2非等向之 3D U-Net 網路架構 24 3.4.3訓練細節 25 3.5 監督式體素層級對比學習 27 3.5.1 體素層級監督式對比學習架構 27 3.5.2類別導向之伫列式記憶庫 29 3.5.3雙視角輸入設計 30 3.5.4負樣本之選取 33 3.5.5 軟正樣本加權體素層級監督式對比損失 35 3.6 後處理 37 第四章 結果與討論 39 4.1資料擴增之結果 39 4.2評估指標 40 4.3 3D U-Net方法之分割結果與討論 41 4.4先期探索:不同表徵學習策略之比較(以BYOL為例) 43 4.5體素級對比式學習之結果與討論 48 4.6嵌入空間之類內凝聚與類間可分性分析 51 4.7本研究之限制與未來工作 55 第五章 結論 59 參考文獻 62 附錄 71 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 冠狀動脈心臟病 | - |
| dc.subject | 鈣化斑塊 | - |
| dc.subject | 光學同調斷層掃描 | - |
| dc.subject | 人工智慧 | - |
| dc.subject | 卷積神經網路 | - |
| dc.subject | 影像分割 | - |
| dc.subject | 對比式學習 | - |
| dc.subject | Coronary Artery Disease | - |
| dc.subject | Calcified Plaque | - |
| dc.subject | Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) | - |
| dc.subject | Artificial Intelligence | - |
| dc.subject | Convolutional Neural Networks | - |
| dc.subject | Image Segmentation | - |
| dc.subject | Contrastive Learning | - |
| dc.title | 體素層級監督式對比學習融合 3D U-Net 之冠狀動脈光學同調斷層影像鈣化斑塊分割 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Voxel-level Supervised Contrastive Learning with a 3D U-Net for Calcified Plaque Segmentation on Intracoronary Optical Coherence Tomography Images | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 114-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李佳燕;程子翔 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chia-Yen Lee;Kevin T. Chen | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 冠狀動脈心臟病,鈣化斑塊光學同調斷層掃描人工智慧卷積神經網路影像分割對比式學習 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Coronary Artery Disease,Calcified PlaqueOptical Coherence Tomography (OCT)Artificial IntelligenceConvolutional Neural NetworksImage SegmentationContrastive Learning | en |
| dc.relation.page | 73 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202600269 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2026-02-06 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 醫學工程學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2026-03-05 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 醫學工程學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-114-1.pdf | 3.4 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
