請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101736完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 賴勇成 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Yung-Cheng Lai | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 黃振瑋 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Chen-Wei Huang | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-03-04T16:09:53Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-03-05 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2026-03-04 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2026-02-23 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Askarzadeh, T., Bridgelall, R., & Tolliver, D. D. (2023). Systematic Literature Review of Drone Utility in Railway Condition Monitoring. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, vol. 149, Issue 6, doi: 10.1061/JTEPBS.TEENG-7726
Aven, T. (2008). Risk analysis: Assessing uncertainties beyond expected values and probabilities. John Wiley & Sons. Bhuiyan, Md. R. H., Ibtihal, S. A., & Nokshi, K. N. (2023). Involvement of Human and Organizational Factors in Railway Accidents: Application of the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System and Bayesian Network. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2677(8), 496-508. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981231156932 Ballay, M., Sventekova, E., Macurova, L., & Ladislav Imrich (2022). Identifying causes of accidents at tevel crossing. International Scientific Conference Engineering for Rural Development 2022. Barmpounakis, E., Vlahogianni, E. I., & Golias, J. C. (2021). A review on the use of remote sensing for railway infrastructure monitoring. Sensors, 21(11), 3690. Baysari, M. T., McIntosh, A. S., & Wilson, J. R. (2008). Understanding the human factors contribution to railway accidents and incidents in Australia. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40(5), 1750-1757. Bedreaga, L., Guzun, B. D., & Constantinescu, C. (1997). Modelling of the Human Factor Using Petri Nets. 2007 iREP Symposium - Bulk Power System Dynamics and Control - VII. Revitalizing Operational Reliability, Charleston, SC, USA, 2007, pp. 1-8 Bin, N. (1970). Analysis of train braking accuracy and safe protection distance in automatic train protection systems. WIT Transactions on The Built Environment, 20. Boehm, B. (1989). Software risk management. In European software engineering conference (pp. 1-19). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Chang, L., Dollevoet, R. P. B. J., & R. F. Hanssen. (2017). Nationwide Railway Monitoring Using Satellite SAR Interferometry. in IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 596-604, doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2016.2584783. Cheng, C. B., Shyur, H. J., & Kuo, Y. S. (2014). Implementation of a flight operations risk assessment system and identification of critical risk factors. Scientia Iranica, 21(6), 2387-2398. Chen, Y. F., Hsueh, K. C., & Lai, Y. C. (2021). Identification of high-risk driving behavior and sections for rail systems. Transportation research record, 2675(12), 1379-1392. Drivalou, S., & Marmaras, N. (2009). Supporting skill-, rule-, and knowledge-based behaviour through an ecological interface: An industry-scale application. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39(6), 947-965. Dorrian, J., Roach, G. D., Fletcher, A., & Dawson, D. (2006). The effects of fatigue on train handling during speed restrictions. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 9(4), 243-257. Ebrahimi, H., Sattari, F., Lefsrud, L., & Macciotta, R. (2021). Analysis of train derailments and collisions to identify leading causes of loss incidents in rail transport of dangerous goods in Canada. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 72, 104517. El Rashidy, R. A. H., Hughes, P., Figueres-Esteban, M., & Van Gulijk, C. (2018). Automated train driver competency performance indicators using real train driving data. In Safety and reliability–safe societies in a changing world (pp. 3071-3075). CRC Press. Ergai, A., Cohen, T., Sharp, J., Wiegmann, D., Gramopadhye, A., & Shappell, S. (2016). Assessment of the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS): Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability. Safety science, 82, 393-398. Esmaeeli, N., Sattari, F., Lefsrud, L., & Macciotta, R. (2024). Assessing the risks associated with the Canadian Railway System using a safety risk model approach. Transportation research record, 2678(2), 795-808. Fan, C., Huang, S., Lin, S., Xu, D., Peng, Y., & Yi, S. (2022). Types, Risk Factors, Consequences, and Detection Methods of Train Driver Fatigue and Distraction. Comput Intell Neurosci. doi: 10.1155/2022/8328077. Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) (2021) Rail Moving America Forward. Proc., TRB Annual Conference. FRA Office of Research, Development, and Technology. https://railroads.dot.gov/sites/fra.dot.gov/files/2020-12/2021_ RDT_CurrentProjects_complete_pdfa.pdf. Ferjencik, M. (2011). An integrated approach to the analysis of incident causes. Safety science, 49(6), 886-905. Figueres-Esteban, M., Hughes, P., El Rashidy, R. A. H., & Van Gulijk, C. (2018). Manifestation of ontologies in graph databases for big data risk analysis. In Safety and Reliability–Safe Societies in a Changing World (pp. 3189-3193). CRC Press. Gehlot, Vijay & Nigro, Carmen. (2011). An introduction to systems modeling and simulation with Colored Petri Nets. Proceedings - Winter Simulation Conference. 104 - 118. doi: 10.1109/WSC.2010.5679170. Gordon, R., Flin, R., & Mearns, K. (2005). Designing and evaluating a human factors investigation tool (HFIT) for accident analysis. Safety science, 43(3), 147-171. Guo, M., Hu, L., & Ye, L. (2019). Cognition and driving safety: How does the high-speed railway drivers’ cognitive ability affect safety performance?, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, vol. 65, pp. 10-22, doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2019.07.006. Hadjimichael, M., McCarthy, J. & Fridman, O. (2002). Flight Operations Risk Assessment System (FORAS). Hani Tabai, B., Bagheri, M., Sadeghi-Firoozabadi, V., Shahidi, V., & Mirasadi, H. (2018). Impact of train drivers’ cognitive responses on rail accidents. Transportation research record, 2672(10), 260-268. Heinrich, H. W. (1941). Industrial Accident Prevention. A Scientific Approach. Hickey, A. R., & Collins, M. D. (2017). Disinhibition and train driver performance. Safety science, 95, 104-115. Hollnagel, E. (1998). Cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM). Elsevier. Hriday, M. S. H. (2022). Quantitative risk assessment of rail infrastructure projects using monte carlo simulation and fuzzy logic. American Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Solutions, 2(01), 55-87. https://doi.org/10.63125/h24n6z92 Huang, W., Kou, X., Zhang, Y., Mi, R., Yin, D., Xiao, W., & Liu, Z. (2021). Operational failure analysis of high-speed electric multiple units: A Bayesian network-K2 algorithm-expectation maximization approach. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 205, 107250. Jafarian, E. & Rezvani, M. A. (2010). Application of fuzzy fault tree analysis for evaluationof railway safety risks: an evaluation of root causes for passenger train derailment. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part F Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 226(1), 14-25. Jay, S. M., Dawson, D., Ferguson, S. A., & Lamond, N. (2008). Driver fatigue during extended rail operations. Applied ergonomics, 39(5), 623-629. Jong, J. C., Lai, Y. C., Young, C. C., & Chen, Y. F. (2020). Application of fault tree analysis and swiss cheese model to the overspeed derailment of Puyuma Train in Yilan, Taiwan. Transportation research record, 2674(5), 33-46. Kang, R., Wang, J., Chen, J., Zhou, J., Pang, Y. & Cheng, J. (2021). Analysis of Failure Features of High-Speed Automatic Train Protection System. IEEE Access. pp. 1-1. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3113381. Kaplan, S., & Garrick, B. J. (1981). On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Analysis, 1(1), 11–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1981.tb01350.x Katsakiori, P., Sakellaropoulos, G., & Manatakis, E. (2009). Towards an evaluation of accident investigation methods in terms of their alignment with accident causation models. Safety science, 47(7), 1007-1015. Kim, D. S., Yoon, W., C. (2013). An accident causation model for the railway industry: Application of the model to 80 rail accident investigation reports from the UK. Safety Science, vol. 60, pp. 57-68, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.06.010. Koohmishi, M., Kaewunruen, S., Chang, L., & Guo, Y. (2024). Advancing railway track health monitoring: Integrating GPR, InSAR and machine learning for enhanced asset management, Automation in Construction, vol. 162, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105378. Kusumastuti, S. A., Kolkman, T. H. J., Lo, J. C., & Borsci, S. (2025). Charting the landscape of rail human factors and automation: A systematic scoping review. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, vol. 30, doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2025.101350. Kyriakidis, M., Pak, K. T., & Majumdar, A. (2015). Railway Accidents Caused by Human Error: Historic Analysis of UK Railways, 1945 to 2012. Transportation Research Record, 2476(1), pp. 126-136. doi:10.3141/2476-17 Leitner, B. (2017). A General Model for Railway Systems Risk Assessment with the Use of Railway Accident Scenarios Analysis. Procedia Engineering, 187, 150-159. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.361 Li, Y., Trinh, H., Haas, N., Otto, C., & Pankanti, S. (2013). Rail component detection, optimization, and assessment for automatic rail track inspection. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 15(2), 760-770. Lin, C. Y., Rapik Saat, M., & Barkan, C. P. (2020). Quantitative causal analysis of mainline passenger train accidents in the United States. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 234(8), 869-884. Lin, C. Y., Saat, M. R., & Barkan, C. P. (2016). Fault tree analysis of adjacent track accidents on shared-use rail corridors. Transportation Research Record, 2546(1), 129-136. Lin, C. Y., Saat, M. R., & Barkan, C. P. (2022). Semi-quantitative risk assessment of adjacent track accidents on shared-use rail corridors. Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management, 24, 100355. Liu, F., Heiner, M. & Yang, M. (2012). An efficient method for unfolding colored Petri nets. Proceedings of the 2012 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), Berlin, Germany, pp. 1-12, doi: 10.1109/WSC.2012.6465203. Liu, P., Yang, L., Gao, Z., Li, S., & Gao, Y. (2015). Fault tree analysis combined with quantitative analysis for high-speed railway accidents. Safety science, 79, 344-357. Li, W. K., & Chang, Y. H. (2005). Constructing an aviation safety risk assessment model. Transportation Planning, 34(1), pp. 145–175. Madleňák, R., Mašek, J., & Madleňáková, L. (2020). An experimental analysis of the driver’s attention during train driving. Open Engineering, 10(1). doi: 10.1515/eng-2020-0011 McLeod, R. W., Walker, G. H., & Moray, N. (2005). Analysing and modelling train driver performance. Applied ergonomics, 36(6), 671-680. Morant, A., Gustafson, A., Söderholm, P., Larsson-Kråik, P.-O., & Kumar, U. (2017). Safety and availability evaluation of railway operation based on the state of signalling systems. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 231(1), 3–15. Muttram, R. I. (2002). Railway safety's safety risk model. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 216(2), 71-79. Myrtek, M., Deutschmann-Janicke, E., Strohmaier, H., Zimmermann, W., Lawerenz, S., Brügner, G., & Müller, W. (1994). Physical, mental, emotional, and subjective workload components in train drivers. Ergonomics, 37(7), 1195-1203. Naweed, A. (2014). Investigations into the skills of modern and traditional train driving. Applied ergonomics, 45(3), 462-470. Nguyen, T.H.A., Trinckauf, J., & Luong, T.A. (2022). Risk Analysis for Train Collisions Using Fault Tree Analysis: Case Study of the Hanoi Urban Mass Rapid Transit. Urban Rail Transit 8, pp. 246–266. doi: 10.1007/s40864-022-00181-y Nivolianitou, Z. S., Leopoulos, V. N., & Konstantinidou, M. (2004). Comparison of techniques for accident scenario analysis in hazardous systems. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 17(6), 467-475. Piening, J. , Ehrmann, T., Meiseberg, B. (2013). Competing risks for train tickets – An empirical investigation of customer behavior and performance in the railway industry, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Volume 51, pp. 1-16, ISSN 1366-5545 Qin, Y., Cao, Z., Sun, Y., Kou, L., Zhao, X., Wu, Y., ... & Jia, L. (2022). Research on active safety methodologies for intelligent railway systems. Engineering. Rasmussen, J. (1987). The definition of human error and a taxonomy for technical system design. In New technology and human error (pp. 23-30). Wiley. Reinach, S., & Viale, A. (2006). Application of a human error framework to conduct train accident/incident investigations. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 38(2), 396-406. Rjabovs A, Palacin R. (2016). The influence of system design-related factors on the safety performance of metro drivers. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit. 231(3):317-328. doi:10.1177/0954409716630007 Roshan, S. A. & Daneshvar, S. (2015). Fire Risk Assessment and Its Economic Loss Estimation in Tehran Subway, Applying Event Tree Analysis. Iranian Journal of Health, Safety and Environment. 2(1). pp. 229-234. Ruijters, E. & Stoelinga, M. (2015). Fault tree analysis: A survey of the state-of-the-art in modeling, analysis and tools, Computer Science Review, vol. 15–16, pp. 29-62, ISSN 1574-0137, doi: 10.1016/j.cosrev.2015.03.001. Sammarco, J. J. (2005). Operationalizing normal accident theory for safety-related computer systems. Safety Science, 43(9), pp. 697-714. San Kim, D., Baek, D. H., & Yoon, W. C. (2010). Development and evaluation of a computer-aided system for analyzing human error in railway operations. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 95(2), 87-98. Sasidharan, M., Burrow, M. P. N., Ghataora, G. S., & Marathu, R. (2022). A risk-informed decision support tool for the strategic asset management of railway track infrastructure. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 236(6), 703–717. Shafiee, M. & Sørensen, J. D. (2019). Maintenance optimization and inspection planning of wind energy assets: Models, methods and strategies, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 192, 105993, doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2017.10.025. Shi, L., Liu, Y., Zhang, Y. & Liang, J. (2024). Data-Driven Bayesian Network Analysis of Railway Accident Risk, IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 38631-38645, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3376590. Shorrock, S. T., & Kirwan, B. (2002). Development and application of a human error identification tool for air traffic control. Applied ergonomics, 33(4), 319-336. Simić, V., Soušek, R., & Jovčić, S. (2020). Picture fuzzy MCDM approach for risk assessment of railway infrastructure. Mathematics, 8(12), 2259. Singh, P., & Singh, S. (2025). Human resource practices in Indian railways: An analytical study of challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Research in Human Resource Management, 7(1F), pp. 551-555. doi: 10.33545/26633213.2025.v7.i1f.326 Song, H., & Schnieder, E. (2018). Evaluating Fault Tree by means of Colored Petri nets to analyze the railway system dependability, Safety Science, vol.110, Part A, pp. 313-323, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.08.017 Stone, E. R., Yates, J. F., & Parker, A. M. (1994). Risk communication: Absolute versus relative expressions of low-probability risks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60(3), 387-408. Hani Tabai, B., Bagheri, M., Sadeghi-Firoozabadi, V., Shahidi, V., & Mirasadi, H. (2018). Impact of Train Drivers’ Cognitive Responses on Rail Accidents. Transportation Research Record, 2672(10), 260-268. doi: 10.1177/0361198118796359 Taiwan Transportation Safety Board (TTSB) & Ministry of Transportation and Communications. (2025). Scope of major transportation accidents [Official regulation]. Motor Vehicles Driver Information Service. https://www.mvdis.gov.tw/webMvdisLaw/LawContent.aspx?LawID=A0084001 Tang, Y., Zhou, M. & Gao, M. (2006) Fuzzy-Petri-net-based disassembly planning considering human factors. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 718-726 United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR), & International Science Council (ISC). (2025). UNDRR–ISC Hazard Information Profiles – 2025 Update: TL0404 Rail Accident United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction; International Science Council. https://www.undrr.org/terms/hips/TL0404 Van Gulijk, C., Hughes, P., Figueres-Esteban, M., El-Rashidy, R., & Bearfield, G. (2018). The case for IT transformation and big data for safety risk management on the GB railways. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, 232(2), 151-163. Vardakis, C., Dimolitsas, I., Spatharakis, D., Dechouniotis, D., Zafeiropoulos, A., Papavassiliou, S. (2025). A Petri Net-based framework for modeling and simulation of resource scheduling policies in Edge Cloud Continuum, Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, vol. 141, 103098, doi: 10.1016/j.simpat.2025.103098. Wang, R., Zheng, W., Liang, C., & Tang, T. (2016) An integrated hazard identification method based on the hierarchical Colored Petri Net, Safety Science, vol. 88, pp. 166-179, doi: 10.1109/TSMCA.2005.853508 Wiegmann, D. A., & Shappell, S. A. (2017). A human error approach to aviation accident analysis: The human factors analysis and classification system. Routledge. You, X., Zhu, L., Liu, Z., & Huang, Y. (2021). Experimental Study on the Relationship between Fatigue and Unsafe Behavior of Urban Rail Transit Drivers. Transportation Research Record, 2675(10), 1151-1160. doi: 10.1177/03611981211014888 Zhao, Y., Stow, J., & Harrison, C. (2018). A method for classifying red signal approaches using train operational data. Safety science, 110, 67-74. Zhan, Q., Zheng, W., & Zhao, B. (2017). A hybrid human and organizational analysis method for railway accidents based on HFACS-Railway Accidents (HFACS-RAs), Safety Science, vol. 91, pp. 232-250, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.08.017 Zhou, Z. & Zhang. Q. (2017), Model Event/Fault Trees With Dynamic Uncertain Causality Graph for Better Probabilistic Safety Assessment. IEEE Transactions on Reliability. vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 178-188, doi: 10.1109/TR.2017.2647845. 孫碩昱(2010)。鐵路司機員駕駛行為分析之研究(碩士論文)。國立成功大學,臺南市。取自 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/tv58nt [Sun, S.Y. (2010). Train Drivers’ Driving Behavior Investigation. (master thesis, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City). Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/tv58nt] 陳柏邑(2024)。以數據驅動貝葉斯網絡建立鐵道行車風險評估框架(碩士論文)。國立台灣大學,台北市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/kjwhe9 [CHEN, P.I. (2024). Development of Train Operation Risk Assessment Framework Based on a Data-Driven Bayesian Network (master thesis, National Taiwan University, Taipei City). Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/kjwhe9] | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101736 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 風險管理在鐵道系統中扮演關鍵角色,若缺乏完善機制,往往因忽略細節而導致重大事故。近年台鐵普悠瑪與太魯閣事故的發生,使社會大眾對鐵道安全風險管理更加關注。然而,鐵道營運係由人員、車輛與基礎設施構成,伴隨高度不確定性與複雜交互作用。為因應此挑戰,本研究提出一套整合Petri Net與故障樹分析的風險評估架構。首先透過人為因素分析與分類系統(HFACS)從歷史事故資料中識別潛在風險因子,並依其類別建構初步故障樹網路架構;考量傳統故障樹無法動態表達因子間的依存關係與非線性互動,本研究進一步將部分網路轉換為Petri Net,強化模型對實際風險因子的互動模式。接續以台鐵實際行車紀錄、路線環境資訊與設備可靠度資料為基礎,搭配事故傷亡與延誤,根據列車與環境差異變化,損失進行不同路段間的風險量化。結果顯示,在不同路段間的風險原因會因為不同的輸入而異,如平交道事故的影響會隨著路段是否有平交道有顯著的差異;而人為失誤機率的高低也會根據不同路段的環境差異有不同的起伏,在大部分情形仍然屬於事故主因。整體而言,本研究所提出之架構可有效根據每班列車行車條件預測風險差異,若能事前提供司機員警示,有助於提早因應與預防,有效提升整體鐵道行車安全。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Risk management is essential in railway systems, as inadequate measures can lead to severe accidents. Recent train accidents in Taiwan, like the Puyuma and Taroko incidents, have heightened concerns about railway safety. Due to the complexity and uncertainty of railway operations, this study proposes a risk assessment framework that combines Petri Nets (PNs) with Fault Tree Analysis (FTA). The framework starts by using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) to identify risk factors from historical accident records, forming preliminary FTA structures. However, to better capture dynamic interdependencies, these FTA networks are converted into PNs. This approach integrates train operation records, operating environment factors, and equipment reliability data from Taiwan Railways, along with details on accidents and delays. We quantify potential losses across various sections to support risk assessment. The results show that risk sources differ across sections based on input conditions. For example, the impact of level crossing accidents depends on the presence of level crossings, while human error likelihood varies with operating environment characteristics. Nevertheless, human error remains the main cause of accidents in most cases. This framework enables proactive risk evaluation for individual train services, providing early warnings to drivers and enhancing overall railway safety. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2026-03-04T16:09:53Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2026-03-04T16:09:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
摘要 iii Abstract iv TABLE OF CONTENT v LIST OF FIGURES viii LIST OF TABLES xi CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Research Objectives 2 1.3 Contribution Summary 4 1.4 Thesis Organization 5 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 7 2.1 Development and Applications for Railway Safety 7 2.1.1 Development of Railway Safety Prevention Technologies 7 2.1.2 Applications for Railway Safety Management 10 2.1.3 Practices of Risk Management in Aviation 11 2.2 Risk Management Methodology 12 2.2.1 Risk identification method 13 2.2.2 Risk evaluation method 16 2.3 Summary of Literature Review 21 CHAPTER 3 METHODS 23 3.1 Research Framework 23 3.2 Accident Fault Tree Construction 26 3.2.1 Causal Analysis under HFACS 26 3.2.2 Basic Fault Tree Construction 33 3.3 Accident Petri Net Construction 36 3.3.1 Petri Net Introduction 36 3.3.2 Colored Petri Net Introduction 37 3.3.3 Specialized Transitions to Evaluate Risk in the TORAS 39 3.4 Petri Net Probability Calculation 41 3.5 Fault Tree Probability Calculation 45 3.6 Consequence Analysis 45 3.7 Risk Analysis 47 CHAPTER 4 CASE STUDY 48 4.1 Background of the Case Study 48 4.2 Data Sources Analysis Used in Case Study 52 4.2.1 Historical Accident Data 52 4.2.2 Literature Review 53 4.2.3 Historical ATP Data 54 4.2.4 Data Restriction 54 4.3 Accident Fault Tree Construction of the Case Study 55 4.4 Derailment Network Evaluation 64 4.4.1 HE in Derailment 64 4.4.2 EI in Derailment 77 4.4.3 Other Failure in Derailment 81 4.4.4 Likelihood Assessment for Derailment 86 4.5 Collision Network Evaluation 89 4.5.1 HE in Collision 89 4.5.2 TF in Collision 90 4.5.3 Likelihood Assessment for Collision 91 4.6 Level Crossing Accident Network Evaluation 94 4.6.1 HE in Level Crossing Accident 94 4.6.2 Rolling stock failure and Level crossing protection system failure in Level Crossing Accident 100 4.6.3 EI in Level Crossing Accident 102 4.6.4 Likelihood Assessment for Level Crossing Accident 103 4.7 Comprehensive Result with Consequence Analysis 106 4.8 Result Uncertainty Analysis 111 CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK 114 5.1 Conclusion 114 5.2 Future Work 116 APPENDIX 119 A. Reference of Risk Factors 119 B. Quantifiability Criteria for Risk Factors regarding Derailment 120 REFERENCE 121 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject | 鐵道運輸 | - |
| dc.subject | 行車風險評估 | - |
| dc.subject | 事故分析 | - |
| dc.subject | 風險因子識別 | - |
| dc.subject | 司機員行為 | - |
| dc.subject | 路段評估 | - |
| dc.subject | Railway Transportation | - |
| dc.subject | Train Operation Risk Assessment | - |
| dc.subject | Accident Analysis | - |
| dc.subject | Risk Factors Identification | - |
| dc.subject | Driver Behavior | - |
| dc.subject | Section-Specific Assessment | - |
| dc.title | 結合故障樹和Petri Net的列車行車風險評估 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Train Operation Risk Assessment System Combining Fault Tree Analysis and Petri Net | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 114-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 林陳佑 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | Chen-Yu Lin | en |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 顏子皓;徐任宏 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Tzu-Hao Yan;Ren-Hong Xu | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 鐵道運輸,行車風險評估事故分析風險因子識別司機員行為路段評估 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Railway Transportation,Train Operation Risk AssessmentAccident AnalysisRisk Factors IdentificationDriver BehaviorSection-Specific Assessment | en |
| dc.relation.page | 132 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202600648 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2026-02-24 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2031-02-03 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-114-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 6.73 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
