請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101607完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 王泓仁 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Hung-Jen Wang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 龔逸挺 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | I-Ting Kung | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-02-11T16:43:49Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-02-12 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2026-02-11 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2026-02-05 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Aronson, B. E. (2011). A reassessment of Japan’s Big Bang financial regulatory reform. Discussion Paper 2011-E-19, IMES Discussion Paper.
Baba, N., Nishizaki, K., Inamura, Y., and Shimizu, T. (2002). Changes in Japan’s financial structure since the later half of the 1990s: the supply of risk capital and major market reforms. Technical report, Bank of Japan. Caballero, R. J., Hoshi, T., and Kashyap, A. K. (2008). Zombie lending and depressed restructuring in Japan. American Economic Review, 98(5):1943–1977. Chen, Y.-Y. and Wang, H.-J. (2025). Tradeoff between efficiency and resilience: Evidence from power plants and rice farmers. Working paper. Chirinko, R. S. and Schaller, H. (1995). Why does liquidity matter in investment equations? Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 27(2):527–548. Chung, K. H. and Pruitt, S. W. (1994). A simple approximation of Tobin’s q. Financial Management, 23(3):70–74. Hayashi, F. (1982). Tobin’s marginal q and average q: A neoclassical interpretation. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pages 213–224. Hoshi, T. (2000). Naze Nihon wa ryudosei no wana kara nogarerarenainoka? (Why is the Japanese economy unable to get out of a liquidity trap?). Zero Kinri to Nihon Keizai (Zero Interest Rate and the Japanese Economy), pages 233–266. Hoshi, T., Kashyap, A., and Scharfstein, D. (1991). Corporate structure, liquidity, and investment: Evidence from Japanese industrial groups. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(1):33–60. Hoshi, T. and Kashyap, A. K. (2004). Japan’s financial crisis and economic stagnation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(1):3–26. Hoshi, T., Scharfstein, D. S., and Singleton, K. J. (1993). Japanese corporate investment and Bank of Japan guidance of commercial bank lending. In Japanese Monetary Policy, pages 63–94. University of Chicago Press. Ito, T. and Hoshi, T. (2020). The Japanese Economy. MIT Press. Kaplan, S. N. and Zingales, L. (1997a). Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(1):169–215. Kaplan, S. N. and Zingales, L. (1997b). Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(1):169–215. Kaplan, S. N. and Zingales, L. (2000). Investment-cash flow sensitivities are not valid measures of financing constraints. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(2):707–712. Kim, S. B. and Moreno, R. (1994). Stock prices and bank lending behavior in Japan. Economic Review-Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, (1):31. Kodde, D. A. and Palm, F. C. (1986). Wald criteria for jointly testing equality and inequality restrictions. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pages 1243–1248. Kumbhakar, S. C., Denny, M., and Fuss, M. (2000). Estimation and decomposition of productivity change when production is not efficient: A paneldata approach. Econometric Reviews, 19(4):312–320. Li, C., Wang, Y., and Zheng, Z. (2014). The path analysis of the dual principal-agent problem affects the over-investment of listed companies: Based on the two-tier heterogeneity stochastic frontier model. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 22(11):131–139. Lindenberg, E. B. and Ross, S. A. (1981). Tobin’s q ratio and industrial organization. The Journal of Business, 54(1):1–32. McGuire, J. and Dow, S. (2003). The persistence and implications of Japanese keiretsu organization. Journal of International Business Studies, 34:374–388. McGuire, J. and Dow, S. (2009). Japanese keiretsu: Past, present, future. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26:333–351. Miyajima, H. and Kuroki, F. (2007). The unwinding of cross-shareholding in Japan: Causes, effects, and implications. Corporate Governance in Japan: Institutional Change and Organizational Diversity, 79. Nakatani, I. (1984). The economic role of financial corporate grouping. The Economic Analysis of the Japanese Firm, 20:227–258. Papadopoulos, A. (2021). The two-tier stochastic frontier framework (2TSF): Measuring frontiers wherever they may exist. In Advances in Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, pages 163–194. Springer. Patrikis, E. T. (1998). Japan’s big bang financial reforms. Brook. J. Int’l L., 24:577. Peek, J. and Rosengren, E. S. (2005). Unnatural selection: Perverse incentives and the misallocation of credit in Japan. American Economic Review, 95(4):1144–1166. Polachek, S. W. and Yoon, B. J. (1987). A two-tiered earnings frontier estimation of employer and employee information in the labor market. The Review of Economics and Statistics, pages 296–302. Wang, H.-J. (2003). A stochastic frontier analysis of financing constraints on investment: the case of financial liberalization in Taiwan. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 21(3):406–419. Weinstein, D. E. and Yafeh, Y. (1998). On the costs of a bank-centered financial system: Evidence from the changing main bank relations in Japan. The Journal of Finance, 53(2):635–672. Wu, X. and Xu, L. L. (2005). The value information of financing decisions and corporate governance during and after the Japanese deregulation. The Journal of Business, 78(1):243–280. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101607 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本論文探討日本企業所屬企業集團(keiretsu,又稱財團,直譯為「系列」)如何影響其投資效率。本文建構一個雙層隨機邊界模型(two-tier stochastic frontier model),以同時刻畫企業的投資不足與投資過度行為。企業集團成員可能因銀行較為保守的監督而出現投資不足,亦可能為了維繫借貸關係與銀行利潤而產生投資過度;同時,企業集團成員亦可能因與集團內銀行關係緊密,而較容易取得融資,從而展現較高投資效率。
模型採用最大模擬概似估計法(maximum simulated likelihood estimation)進行估計,並放寬傳統對無效率項分配的限制,允許其分別服從指數分配、半常態分配、Gamma 分配、Pareto 分配與 Weibull 分配。實證結果顯示,企業集團成員在 1990 年代以前的投資效率相對較高,但其後投資效率優勢逐漸消失,可能源於企業集團內部持續存在的殭屍放貸(zombie lending),以及其對銀行融資的持續依賴;相較之下,非企業集團企業則轉向市場導向的替代融資方式。 整體而言,研究結果突顯了在日本金融體系演變的過程中,銀行與企業關係的經濟意涵已發生顯著轉變。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This thesis examines how keiretsu affiliation influences investment efficiency in Japanese firms. A two-tier stochastic frontier framework is developed to capture both under- and over-investment. Keiretsu firms may under-invest due to conservative bank monitoring or over-invest to preserve lending relationships and bank profits; at the same time, close ties with group-affiliated banks may improve access to credit and enhance investment efficiency.
The models are estimated using maximum simulated likelihood estimation, relaxing standard distributional assumptions by allowing inefficiency terms to follow Exponential, Half-Normal, Gamma, Pareto, and Weibull distributions. The results show that keiretsu firms exhibited higher investment efficiency prior to the 1990s, but this advantage gradually dissipated thereafter, likely due to persistent zombie lending within keiretsu groups and continued reliance on bank financing, while non-keiretsu firms increasingly adopted market-based alternatives. The findings highlight the changing economic role of bank–firm relationships in Japan's evolving financial landscape. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2026-02-11T16:43:49Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2026-02-11T16:43:49Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Front matter
Master’s Thesis Acceptance Certificate i Acknowledgements ii Abstract in Chinese iii Abstract iv Table of contents v List of Figures vi List of Tables vii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Literature Review 4 1.1.1 Keiretsu Affiliation 4 1.1.2 Stochastic Frontier Analysis 6 2 Two-Tier Stochastic Frontier Model for Bidirectional Investment Inefficiencies 8 3 Econometrics 12 3.1 The Model 12 3.2 Data 15 3.2.1 Sectoral Categorization 19 3.2.2 Summary Statistics 20 4 Estimation Results 22 4.1 Total Sample Period 22 4.2 Two Sample Periods after Chow Test 25 5 Post-Estimation Discussion 31 5.1 Market Liberalization 31 5.1.1 Before 1992: Main Bank System, Information Superiority, and Drawbacks 31 5.1.2 During the 1990s: Financial Market Reform 32 5.1.3 After 1993: Keiretsu Persistence with Bank Ties 33 5.2 Japanese Zombie Lending 35 5.3 Summary 36 6 Conclusion 37 Bibliography 38 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject | 雙層隨機邊界模型 | - |
| dc.subject | 蒙地卡羅模擬 | - |
| dc.subject | 最大模擬概似估計 | - |
| dc.subject | 企業集團 | - |
| dc.subject | 投資 | - |
| dc.subject | 日本經濟 | - |
| dc.subject | two-tier stochastic frontier models | - |
| dc.subject | Monte Carlo simulation | - |
| dc.subject | maximum simulated likelihood estimation | - |
| dc.subject | keiretsu | - |
| dc.subject | investment | - |
| dc.subject | Japanese economy | - |
| dc.title | 日本企業集團體制對投資效率的影響:雙層隨機邊界模型與最大模擬概似估計分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Impact of Keiretsu Affiliation on Investment Efficiency in Japan: Two-tier Stochastic Frontier Models with Maximum Simulated Likelihood Estimation | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 114-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 廖仁哲;盧信銘 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Jen-Che Liao;Hsin-Ming Lu | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 雙層隨機邊界模型,蒙地卡羅模擬最大模擬概似估計企業集團投資日本經濟 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | two-tier stochastic frontier models,Monte Carlo simulationmaximum simulated likelihood estimationkeiretsuinvestmentJapanese economy | en |
| dc.relation.page | 41 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202600627 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2026-02-08 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 經濟學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | N/A | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 經濟學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-114-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 854.45 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
