請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10153完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳鴻基 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yung-Hao Tsou | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 鄒永灝 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T21:05:51Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2012-03-10 | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T21:05:51Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2011-07-25 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2011-07-03 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文文獻
朱文禎、陳哲賢（2007）。探討虛擬社群之知識分享行為：以線上遊戲社群為例。電子商務研究，5（1）；55-80。 汪志堅、賴正育（2006）。以社會資本觀點探討虛擬社群成員之知識分享動機。國立台北大學資訊管理所，2006年電子商務與數位生活研討會。 李銘薰、卜小蝶（2009）。電腦與數位3C專業虛擬社群知識分享之影響因素研究。教育資料與圖書館學，46（3）；377-401。 高郁倫（2010）。人格特質對於網路社群知識分享及創造影響情形之研究-以程式設計論壇為例。國立成功大學資訊管理研究所，碩士論文。 郭欣怡（1998）。虛擬社群認同與網路社會支持對主觀幸福感的影響。國立台灣大學心理研究所，碩士論文。 陳靖旻（2008）。影響虛擬社群成員知識分享因素之探討－社會資本觀點。國立中央大學資訊管理研究所，碩士論文。 陳鴻基（2002）。網路社會中資訊隱私權之研究-網路使用者的身份狀態對個人隱私權動機的影響-台灣與美國之比較。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫。 張乃文（2009）。Web2.0網站平台管理之法制議題研析－以網路真名制與揭露使用者身份資料爲中心。科技法律透析；42-60。 張火燦、劉淑寧（2002）。從社會網絡理論探討員工知識分享。人力資源管理學報，3（2）；101-113。 粟四維、莊友豪（2010）。虛擬社群成員知識分享意圖探討。資訊管理學報，17（3）；181-204。 黃聖育、陳昭秀（2008）。影響網路社群中知識分享的因素初探-以協同編纂維基專書(wikibook)為例。2008台灣網際網路研討會，3；1449-1453。 鄭仁偉、黎士群（2001）。組織公平、信任與知識分享行為之關係性研究。人力資源管理學報，1（2）；69-93。 翟本瑞（1999）。虛擬社區的社會學基礎。『社會科學理論與本土化』學術研討會論文集；144-155。嘉義：南華大學。 戴怡君、董旭英（2002）。使用網際網路進行互動者特質之探討。資訊社會研究，2；29-58。 英文文獻 Alavi, M. and Leidner, D. E. “Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues,” MIS Quarterly (25:1), 2001, pp. 107-136. Allen, J.P. “Knowledge-sharing successes in Web 2.0 Communities,” IEEE Technology and Society Magazine (29：1), 2010, pp. 58-64. Amabile, T.M “A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations,” In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (10), Greenwich, CT, JAI Press, 1988 , pp. 123-167. Anne, B. “Communities On-Line: Community-Based Computer Networks,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Master Thesis, 1995. Armstrong, A.G., and Hagel III, J. “The Real Value of on-Line Communities,” Harvard Business Review (74:3), 1996, pp. 134-141. Bieber, M., Engelbart, D., Furuta, R., Hiltz, S.R., Noll, J., Preece, J., Stohr, E.A., Turoff, M., and Van De Walle, B. “ Toward Virtual Community Knowledge Evolution, ” Journal of Management Information System (18:4), 2002, pp. 11-35. Blau, P. M. “Exchange and Power in Social Life,” John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1964. Boone, P.F. “Managing Intracorporate Knowledge Sharing,” Delft, Eburon, 1997. Bressler, S. E. and Grantham, C. “Communities of Commerce: Building Internet Business Communities to Accelerate Growth, Minimize Risk, and Increase Customer Loyalty,” In Bressler, S. E. and Grantham, C. (Eds.), McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, 2000. Brief, A. P. & Aldag, R. J. “The intrinsic extrinsic dichotomy toward conceptual clarity,” Academy of Management Review, (2：3), 1977, pp. 496-500. Brin, D. “The Transparent Society: Will Technology Force Us to Choose between Privacy and Freedom?” Addison-Wesley Longman, Inc., 1998. Cabrera, A., and Cabrera, E.F. “Knowledge-sharing dilemmas,” Organization Studies (23:5), 2002, pp. 687-710. Carver, C. “Building a Virtual Community for a Tele-Learning Environment,” IEEE Communications Magazine (37:3), 1999, pp. 114-118. Chaudhury, A., Mallick, D. N., and Rao, H. R., “Web Channels in E-commerce,” [Magazine], Communications of the ACM (44:1), 2001. Coleman, J. S. “Foundations of Social Theory,” Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990. Constant, D., Sproull, L., and Kiesler, S. “The Kindness of Strangers: The Usefulness of Electronic Weak Ties for Technical Advice,” Organization Science (7:2), 1996, pp.119-135 Constant, D., Kiesler, S., and Sproull, L. 'What's Mine is Ours, or Is it? A Study of Attitudes about Information Sharing,' Information Systems Research (5:4), 1994, pp. 400-421. Correia, A, M, R , Paulos, A and Mesquita, A. “Virtual Communities of Practice: Investigating Motivations and Constraints in the Processes of Knowledge Creation and Transfer,” Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management (8:1), 2010, pp. 11-20. Davenport, T.H. and Prusak, L. “Working knowledge,” Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1998. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. “Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology (22), 1992, pp. 1111-1132. Dholakia, U. M., Bagozzi, R.P., and Pearo, L.K. “A Social Influence Model of Consumer Participation in Network- and Small-Group-Based Virtual Communities,” International Journal of Research in Marketing (21), 2004, pp. 241-263. Deci, E. & Ryan, R. “Intrinsic Motivation and Self-determination in Human Behavior,” New York: Plenum Press, 1985. Donath, J. S. 'Identity and Deception in the Virtual Community,' in Communities in Cyberspace, M. A. Smith and P. Kollock (Eds.), Routledge, New York, 1999, pp. 29-59. Dretske, F. “Knowledge and the Flow of Information,” MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1981. Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. “Beliefs, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research,” Philippines : Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1975. Fukuyama, F. “Trust. The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity,” The Free Press, New York, 1995. Grover, V. and Davenport, T.H. “General perspectives on knowledge management: fostering a research agenda,” Journal of Management Information System (18:1), 2001, pp. 5-21. Hagel III, J., & Armstrong, A. “Net gain: Expanding markets through virtual communities,” Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1997. Hendriks, P. “Why Share Knowledge? the Influence of ICT on Motivation of Knowledge Sharing,” Knowledge and Process Management (6:2), 1999, pp. 91-100. James S.H. Kwok and S. Gao. “Knowledge sharing community in P2P network: a study of motivational perspective,” Journal of Knowledge Management (18:1), 2004, pp. 94-102. Jarvenpaa, S. L. & Staple D.S. “Exploring perceptions of organizational ownership of information and expertise,” Journal of Management Information System (18), 2001, pp. 151-183. Jones, Q. and S. Rafaeli. “Time to Split, Virtually: 'Discourse Architecture' and 'Community Building' as means to Creating Vibrant Virtual Metropolises,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce & Business Media (10:4), 2000, pp. 214-223. Kim, J., Lee, S.M. and Olsen, D.L. “Knowledge sharing: Effects of cooperative type and reciprocity level,” Int. J. Knowledge Management (2:4), 2006, pp. 1-16. Katzy, B.R. and Ma, X. “Virtual professional communities – definitions and typology,” in Pawar, K., Weber, F., Thoben, K. (Eds.), Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising, Rome, Italy, University of Nottingham, 2002, pp. 311-318. Kollock. P. 'The Economies of Online Cooperation: Gifts, and Public Goods in Cyberspace,' in Communities in Cyberspace. M. A. Smith and P. Kollock (Eds.), Routledge, NewYork, 1999, pp. 220-239. Lakhani, K., and von Hippei, E. 'How Open Source Software Works: Free' User-to-User Assistance,' Research Policy (32:6), 2003, pp. 923-943. Lee, S. L., Vogel, D., & Limayem, M. “Virtual community informatics: what we know and what we need to know?” In R. H. Sprague(Ed.), Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii international conference on system sciences. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, 2002, pp.2863-2872 Lee, MKO, Cheung, CMK, & Lim, KH. “Understanding customer knowledge sharing in web-based discussion boards: An exploratory study,” Internet research(16:3), 2006, pp. 289-303. Kane, A.A., Argote, L. and Levine, J.M. “Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process (96), 2005, pp.56-71. Lewicki, R. J. and Bunker, B. B. 'Developing and Maintaining Trust in Work Relationships,' in Trust in Organizations. R. M. Kramer and T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Sage Publications, London, 1996. Lin, N. “Social Capital”, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2001. Machlup, F. 'Semantic Quirks in Studies of Information,' in F. Machlup and U. Mansfield (Eds.), The Study of Information, New York: John Wiley, 1983. Na Ubon, A. & Kimble, C. “Knowledge management in online distance education,” In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference Networked Learning, 2002, pp. 465-473. University of Sheffield, UK. Retrieved January 18, 2008, from http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/mis/docs/km_in_olde.pdf Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal. S. 'Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage,' Academy of Management Review (23:2), 1998, pp. 242-266. Nonaka, I. “A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation,” Organization Science (5), 1994, pp. 14-37. Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge – creating company. Oxford University Press, New York. O’Reilly, T. ‘‘What is WEB 2.0 – design patterns and business models for the next generation of software,’’ 2005. available at: www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html. Polanyi, M. “The Tacit Dimension,” Anchor Book, Garden City, N. Y., 1996. Porter, C.E. and Donthu, N. “Cultivating Trust and Harvesting Value in Virtual Community,” Management Science (54:1), 2008, pp. 113-128. Preece, J. “Online Communities – Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability,” John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 2000. Putnam. R. 'Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital,' Journal of Democracy (6), 1995, pp. 65-78. Putnam, R. 'Tuning in. Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America,' Political Science and Politics, 1995, pp. 664-683. Rheingold, H. “The virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier,” Addison-Wesley, 1993. Ridings, C., Gefen, D., and Arinze, B. “Some Antecedents and Effects of Trust in Virtual Communities,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems (11:3-4), 2002, pp. 271-295. Romm, C., Pliskin, N., and Clarke, R. “Virtual Communities and Society: Toward an Integrative Three Phase Model,” International Journal of Information Management (17:4), 1997, pp. 261-270. Rothaermel, F. T. and Sugiyama, S. “Virtual internet communities and commercial success: individual and community-level theory grounded in the atypical case of TimeZone.com”, Journal of Management (27), 2001, pp.297-312. Stott, K. & Walker, A. “Team, Teamwork & Teambuilding: The manager's complete guide to teams in organizations,” New York, Prentice Hall, 1995. Sharratt, M. and Usoro, A. “Understanding Knowledge-Sharing in Online Communities of Practice”, Electronic Journal on Knowledge Management (1:2), 2003, pp. 187-196. Shumaker. S. and Brownell. A. 'Toward a Theory of Social Support: Closing Conceptual Gaps.' Journal of Social Issues (40.4), 1984, pp. 11-36. Stuckey, B., & Barab, S. “New conceptions for community design,” In R.Andrews & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of e-learning research, 2007, pp. 439-465, Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications. Sveiby, K. E. “The New Organizational Wealth,” Berret-Koehler, San Francisco, 1997. Teo, H. H., Chan, H. C., Weib, K. K., and Zhang, Z. ”Evaluating Information Accessibility and Community Adaptivity Features for Sustaining Virtual Learning Communities,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (59:5), 2003, pp. 671-697. Teo, T. S. H., Lim, V. K. G. and Lai, R. Y. C. 'Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage,' Omega (27:1), 1999, pp. 25-37. Tidwell, M. V. “A Social Identity Model of Prosocial Behaviors Within Nonprofit Organizations,” Nonprofit Management & Leadership (15:4), 2005, pp. 449-467. Tonnies, F. “Community and Society”, Newton Abbot, UK: David & Charles, 1988. Tuomi, I. 'Data is More Than Knowledge: Implications of the Reversed Hierarchy for Knowledge Management and Organizational Memory,' in Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 1999. Vance, D. M. 'Information, Knowledge and Wisdom: The Epistemic Hierarchy and Computer-Based Information System,' in Proceedings of the Third Americas Conference on Information Systems, B. Perkins and I. Vessey (eds.), Indianapolis, IN, 1997. Von Krogh, G. “Care in knowledge creation”, California Management Review (40:3), 1998, pp. 133-53. Wasko, M. M. and Faraj, S. “It Is What One Does: Why People Participate and Help Others in Electronic Communities of Practice,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems (9), 2000, pp. 155-173. Wasco, M. M. and Faraj, S. “Why should i share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice,” MIS Quarterly (29 :1), 2005, pp. 35-57. Wellman, B. and Gulia, M. “Net Surfers Don't Ride Alone, in Networks in the Global Village,” Edited by B. Wellman, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1999. Yoo, W. S., Suh, K. S. and Lee, M. B. “Exploring Factors Enhancing Member Participation in Virtual Communities,” Journal of Global Information Management (10:3), 2002, pp. 55-71. Zboralski, K. “Antecedents of knowledge sharing in communities of practice”, Journal of Knowledge Management (13:3), 2009, pp. 90-101. 網路文獻 創市際市場研究顧問（2010）。「ARO網路測量研究」。網址：http://www.insightxplorer.com/news/news_05_28_10.html UM（2010）。「Wave 5 - The Socialisation Of Brands」。網址：http://newsletter.tw.umww.asia/ | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10153 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 在Web2.0概念的影響下，網路使用者的角色從過去的資訊接收者，轉變為網站內容的提供者，而網站內容的豐富程度，往往是決定虛擬社群成敗之關鍵因素。因此，了解影響網路使用者於虛擬社群中分享知識的因素，便成為虛擬社群經營者一項重要的課題。本研究以網路使用者參與虛擬社群之動機目的出發，參考創市際及國際市調機構UM提出之兩份網路市調報告，將參與虛擬社群動機分為內在動機及外在動機，分別探討其對於虛擬社群成員知識分享意願之影響。
外在動機變項包含「人際關係」、「意見交流」及「獲取聲譽」。此外，近年來由於Facebook與Twitter等社群網站的興起，網路身份制度亦由過去以假名制為主的情形，轉變為真名與假名共存。因此，為考量不同制度下的影響，本研究將「身份制度」作為外在動機對知識分享意圖之調節變項。內在動機變項包含「互惠」、「樂於助人」及「信任」，並以「社群認同」為調節變項，探討其對上述關係之影響。 本研究以台灣地區網路使用者為研究對象，共回收368份有效問卷。根據階層迴歸分析結果，顯示「外在動機」對「知識分享意圖」有顯著正向影響，然而「身份制度」的調節效果並不顯著。另一方面，「內在動機」對「知識分享意圖」亦呈現顯著的正向影響，而「社群認同」在「樂於助人」與「信任」對知識分享意圖之關係中存在顯著之調節效果，但於「互惠」對知識分享意圖的關係中並不存在顯著的調節效果。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | A Web 2.0 site allows users to interact and collaborate with each other in a social dialogue where each is also a consumer, called prosumers, of user-generated content in the virtual community. In contrast to websites where users (called consumers) are limited to the passive viewing of content for them, it will be interesting and crucial to find the right conditions and incentives on knowledge sharing issues prior to engaging in more Web 2.0 applications. It is also important to know the key determinant to Web 2.0 virtual community’s success for further Social Network innovation.
Base on motivational theory, this research examines the impacts of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on the intention of knowledge sharing in the virtual community. Here the extrinsic motivation construct includes creating and maintaining friendships, exchanging opinions, and enhancing reputation while the intrinsic motivation construct consists of reciprocity, enjoy helping and trust. In viewing the communication in virtual community, people either uses real name or pseudonym (e.g., token) in their interaction and sharing so that “user Identification system” and “virtual community identification” are included in the model and their moderating effects are also examined. A total of 368 online survey questionnaires were collected and analyzed. The results indicate that both extrinsic and intrinsic motivation affect individuals' intentions to share knowledge. Additionally, we find that virtual community identification moderates the relationship of some intrinsic motivations (enjoy helping and trust) and knowledge-sharing intention. Surprisingly, we find that there is no moderate effect by users’ identification system between extrinsic motivations and knowledge-sharing intention. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T21:05:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R98741039-1.pdf: 1703342 bytes, checksum: 9cdcd8dcc1ab0443f4f29cfc2fe3b464 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要 i
英文摘要 ii 第一章、緒論 1 第一節、研究背景與動機 1 第二節、研究目的 3 第二章、文獻探討 4 第一節、虛擬社群 4 第二節、知識分享 10 第三節、理性行為理論 13 第四節、影響知識分享內外在動機 15 第三章、研究方法 25 第一節、研究架構 25 第二節、研究假設 27 第三節、研究變數定義與衡量 30 第四節、研究對象與資料分析方法 34 第四章、研究結果與分析 35 第一節、樣本基本資料分析 35 第二節、因素分析與信效度分析 38 第三節、變項相關性分析 41 第四節、研究假說檢定 45 第五節、共同方法偏誤 51 第五章、結論與建議 53 第一節、研究結果討論 53 第二節、管理意涵 58 第三節、研究限制與建議 61 參考文獻 63 中文文獻 63 英文文獻 64 附錄 73 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 參與虛擬社群內外在動機對知識分享意圖之探討 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Knowledge-Sharing Intentions in Virtual Community：Effects of Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivations of Participating in Virtual Community | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 劉俞志,江志卿 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 虛擬社群,內外在動機,身份制度,社群認同,知識分享意圖, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Virtual Community,Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivations,Users’ Identification system,Virtual Community Identification,Knowledge-sharing Intentions, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 76 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2011-07-04 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 商學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-100-1.pdf | 1.66 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。