Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 工學院
  3. 工程科學及海洋工程學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101435
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor王昭男zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorChao-Nan Wangen
dc.contributor.author李國豪zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorKuo-Hao Lien
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-03T16:16:01Z-
dc.date.available2026-02-04-
dc.date.copyright2026-02-03-
dc.date.issued2026-
dc.date.submitted2026-01-27-
dc.identifier.citation[1]. Lu, Y. (2025). The current status and developing trends of industry 4.0: A review. Information Systems Frontiers, 27(1), 215-234.
[2]. Ji, T., & Xu, X. (2025). Exploring the integration of cloud manufacturing and cyber-physical systems in the era of Industry 4.0–An OPC UA approach. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 93, 102927.
[3]. Qiu, F., Kumar, A., Hu, J., Sharma, P., Tang, Y. B., Xu Xiang, Y., & Hong, J. (2025). A Review on Integrating IoT, IIoT, and Industry 4.0: A Pathway to Smart Manufacturing and Digital Transformation. IET Information Security, 2025(1), 9275962.
[4]. Rojas, L., Peña, Á., & Garcia, J. (2025). AI-driven predictive maintenance in mining: a systematic literature review on fault detection, digital twins, and intelligent asset management. Applied Sciences, 15(6), 3337.
[5]. Rahal, J. R., Schwarz, A., Sahelices, B., Weis, R., & Anton, S. D. (2025). The asset administration shell as enabler for predictive maintenance: a review. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 36(1), 19-33.
[6]. Papavasileiou, A., Michalos, G., & Makris, S. (2025). Quality control in manufacturing–review and challenges on robotic applications. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 38(1), 79-115.
[7]. Escobar, C. A., Cantoral-Ceballos, J. A., & Morales-Menendez, R. (2025). Quality 4.0: Learning quality control, the evolution of SQC/SPC. Quality Engineering, 37(1), 92-117.
[8]. Oliveira, D., Alvelos, H., & Rosa, M. J. (2025). Quality 4.0: results from a systematic literature review. The TQM Journal, 37(2), 379-456.
[9]. Yin, C., Li, Y., Wang, Y., & Dong, Y. (2025). Physics-guided degradation trajectory modeling for remaining useful life prediction of rolling bearings. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 224, 112192.
[10]. Bharatheedasan, K., Maity, T., Kumaraswamidhas, L. A., & Durairaj, M. (2025). Enhanced fault diagnosis and remaining useful life prediction of rolling bearings using a hybrid multilayer perceptron and LSTM network model. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 115, 355-369.
[11]. Zhong, J., Jiang, H., Gu, K., Zhong, J., & Zhong, S. (2025). Remaining useful life prediction of rolling bearing based on multi-region hypergraph self-attention network. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 225, 112331.
[12]. In-House CNC. (2025, March 31). How much does CNC spindle repair cost? https://www.in-housecnc.com/2025/03/31/how-much-does-cnc-spindle-repair-cost/
[13]. Siemens. (2024). The true cost of downtime 2024. https://assets.new.siemens.com/siemens/assets/api/uuid:1b43afb5-2d07-47f7-9eb7-893fe7d0bc59/TCOD-2024_original.pdf
[14]. Dai, Y., Liu, X., Pang, J., Li, Y., Lv, Y., & Niu, Y. (2025). Vibration trend forecasting of motorized spindle on the basis of signal processing and deep learning. Nonlinear Dynamics, 113(14), 17477-17490.
[15]. Dai, Y., Qiao, B., Chen, X., & Pan, G. (2025). A review on high-speed electric spindle dynamics modeling and vibration response research. Recent Patents on Engineering, 19(2), E041223224186.
[16]. Wang, N., Shi, H., Gao, T., Bai, X., Zhang, K., & Wu, R. (2025). Nonlinear behavior and dynamic characteristics of multi-supported rotor systems under the influence of coaxiality deviation. Journal of Vibration and Control, 10775463251336942.
[17]. Xie, P., Zhang, Z., Liao, H., Zhao, H., Tie, Y., & Jiang, W. (2025). Industrial motorized spindle systems: challenges and trends in bearing, thermal, and fault diagnosis. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 1-46.
[18]. Timken. (2019). Timken Fafnir super precision bearings for machine tool applications [Catalog No. 5918]. https://www.timken.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Timken-Fafnir-Super-Precision-Bearings-for-Machine-Tool-Applications_5918.pdf
[19]. Zhang, J., & Zheng, B. (2025, November). Research on design and performance test of motor test-bed. In Fourth International Conference on New Materials, Machinery, and Vehicle Engineering (NMMVE 2025) (Vol. 13953, pp. 433-440). SPIE.
[20]. Yang, Z., Chen, F., Luo, W., Xu, B., & Wang, S. (2021). Reliability Test Rig of the Motorized Spindle and Improvements on Its Ability for High‐Speed and Long‐Term Tests. Shock and Vibration, 2021(1), 6637335.
[21]. Wang, J., Yang, C., Xia, Y., Hu, Q., Chen, F., & Du, K. (2018). Development of comprehensive performance testing technology for motorized spindle. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 10(12), 1687814018818963.
[22]. Liu, X., Zhang, Z., Li, Z., Wang, J., Zhu, Y., & Ma, H. (2025). Advancements in bearing health monitoring and remaining useful life prediction: techniques, challenges, and future directions. Measurement Science and Technology, 36(3), 032003.
[23]. Zhao, X., Yang, Y., Huang, Q., Fu, Q., Wang, R., & Wang, L. (2025). Rolling bearing remaining useful life prediction method based on vibration signal and mechanism model. Applied Acoustics, 228, 110334.
[24]. Xu, X., Liao, X., Zhou, T., He, Z., & Hu, H. (2024). Vibration-based identification of lubrication starved bearing using spectral centroid indicator combined with minimum entropy deconvolution. Measurement, 226, 114156.
[25]. Hao, J., Li, C., Song, W., Yao, Z., Miao, H., Xu, M., ... & Liu, Z. (2023). Thermal-mechanical dynamic interaction in high-speed motorized spindle considering nonlinear vibration. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 240, 107959.
[26]. Yang, Z., Liu, B., Zhang, Y., Chen, Y., Zhao, H., Zhang, G., ... & Zhang, Z. (2024). Intelligent sensing of thermal error of CNC machine tool spindle based on Multi-source information fusion. Sensors, 24(11), 3614.
[27]. Tao, X., Zhao, Y., & Chen, Y. (2025). Vibration monitoring and health status recognition technology of machine tool electric spindle. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 72(1), 1-18.
[28]. Yedurkar, D. P., Schlech, T., & Sause, M. G. (2025). A systematic review on smart and predictive maintenance in tool condition monitoring. IEEE Access.
[29]. Wang, Y., Xiao, H., Zhang, Z., Guo, X., & Liu, Q. (2025). Self‐supervised representation learning of metro interior noise based on variational autoencoder and deep embedding clustering. Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 40(4), 503-522.
[30]. Tian, J., Han, D., Karimi, H. R., Zhang, Y., & Shi, P. (2024). A universal multi-source domain adaptation method with unsupervised clustering for mechanical fault diagnosis under incomplete data. Neural Networks, 173, 106167.
[31]. Yu, S., Song, L., Pang, S., Wang, M., He, X., & Xie, P. (2024). M-Net: a novel unsupervised domain adaptation framework based on multi-kernel maximum mean discrepancy for fault diagnosis of rotating machinery. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 10(3), 3259-3272.
[32]. Sheka, S., & Saraswathi, A. B. (2025). Improving Mechanical Fault Diagnosis Using Graph Neural Networks with Dynamic and Multiscale Features. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 15(4), 25382-25387.
[33]. Wang, H., Wang, H., & Tang, X. (2025). A Review of Deep Learning in Rotating Machinery Fault Diagnosis and Its Prospects for Port Applications. Applied Sciences, 15(21), 11303.
[34]. Zhao, J., Wang, W., Huang, J., & Ma, X. (2025). A comprehensive review of deep learning-based fault diagnosis approaches for rolling bearings: Advancements and challenges. AIP Advances, 15(2).
[35]. Mo, H., Huang, A., Chen, S., Wang, Z., Kong, X., Jiang, Z., & Mao, Z. (2025). Unsupervised fault diagnosis and novel fault recognition for rotating machinery based on enhanced clustered autoencoder. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 159, 111822.
[36]. Tian, J., Han, D., Karimi, H. R., Zhang, Y., & Shi, P. (2024). A universal multi-source domain adaptation method with unsupervised clustering for mechanical fault diagnosis under incomplete data. Neural Networks, 173, 106167.
[37]. Bagri, I., Tahiry, K., Hraiba, A., Touil, A., & Mousrij, A. (2024). Vibration signal analysis for intelligent rotating machinery diagnosis and prognosis: a comprehensive systematic literature review. Vibration, 7(4), 1013-1062.
[38]. Chen, J., Zhou, D., Lyu, C., & Lu, C. (2017). Feature reconstruction based on t-SNE: an approach for fault diagnosis of rotating machinery. Journal of Vibroengineering, 19(7), 5047-5060.
[39]. Davies, D. L., & Bouldin, D. W. (2009). A cluster separation measure. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, (2), 224-227.
[40]. Rousseeuw, P. J. (1987). Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of computational and applied mathematics, 20, 53-65.
[41]. Deng, W., Nguyen, K. T., & Medjaher, K. (2022, June). Physics Informed Self Supervised Learning For Fault Diagnostics and Prognostics in the Context of Sparse and Noisy Data. In PHM Society European Conference (Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 574-576).
[42]. Wang, C., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Li, X., & Chen, Z. (2025). Richly connected spatial–temporal graph neural network for rotating machinery fault diagnosis with multi-sensor information fusion. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 225, 112230.
[43]. Liu, Y., Yu, Z., & Xie, M. (2024). Cascading time-frequency transformer and spatio-temporal graph attention network for rotating machinery fault diagnosis. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.
[44]. Ma, J., Huang, J., Liu, S., Luo, J., & Jing, L. (2024). A Self-Attention Legendre Graph Convolution Network for Rotating Machinery Fault Diagnosis. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 24(17), 5475.
[45]. Zhou, Q., Xue, L., He, J., Jia, S., & Li, Y. (2024). A rotating machinery fault diagnosis method based on dynamic graph convolution network and hard threshold denoising. Sensors, 24(15), 4887.
[46]. Xiao, Z., Cao, X., Hao, H., Liang, S., Liu, J., & Li, D. (2025). A Spatio-Temporal Joint Diagnosis Framework for Bearing Faults via Graph Convolution and Attention-Enhanced Bidirectional Gated Networks. Sensors, 25(13), 3908.
[47]. Ren, Z., & Zhou, Y. (2025). On cross-attention-based graph neural networks for fault diagnosis using multi-sensor measurement. Structural Health Monitoring, 14759217251327760.
[48]. Singh, M. T. (2025). Graph-based fault diagnosis for rotating machinery: Adaptive segmentation and structural feature integration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.20756.
[49]. Li, K. H., Wang, C. N., & Tang, Y. C. (2025). Enhancing Latent Defect Detection in Built‐In Spindle Assembly Lines Through Vibration Data Analysis. Shock and Vibration, 2025(1), 7434412.
[50]. Li, K. H., Wang, C. N., & Tang, Y. C. (2025). Leveraging graph attention networks for enhanced latent defect detection in precision built-in spindle assembly lines. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 17(8), 16878132251370862.
[51]. Cooley, J. W., & Tukey, J. W. (1965). An algorithm for the machine calculation of complex Fourier series. Mathematics of computation, 19(90), 297-301.
[52]. Tiboni, M., Remino, C., Bussola, R., & Amici, C. (2022). A review on vibration-based condition monitoring of rotating machinery. Applied Sciences, 12(3), 972.
[53]. Jolliffe, I. (2011). Principal component analysis. In International encyclopedia of statistical science (pp. 1094-1096). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
[54]. Jolliffe, I. T., & Cadima, J. (2016). Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments. Philosophical transactions of the royal society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374(2065), 20150202.
[55]. Maaten, L. V. D., & Hinton, G. (2008). Visualizing data using t-SNE. Journal of machine learning research, 9(Nov), 2579-2605.
[56]. Žalik, K. R., & Žalik, M. (2023, July). Comparison of K-means, K-means++, X-means and Single Value Decomposition for Image Compression. In 2023 27th International Conference on Circuits, Systems, Communications and Computers (CSCC) (pp. 295-301). IEEE.
[57]. Wang, K., Fu, Y., Zhou, S., Zhou, R., Wen, G., Zhou, F., & Li, L. (2024). Cloud detection from Himawari-8 spectral images using K-means++ clustering with the convolutional module. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 45(3), 930-953.
[58]. Jing, Z. (2024, April). Research on E-commerce Customer Segmentation Based on the K-means++ algorithm. In International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (pp. 439-446). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
[59]. Zhao, M., Guo, Z., Liu, Y., Li, H., Li, H., & Li, Y. (2023, September). Research on fault diagnosis of geothermal heat pump based on EEMD and kmeans++. In 2023 IEEE 7th Information Technology and Mechatronics Engineering Conference (ITOEC) (Vol. 7, pp. 1077-1081). IEEE.
[60]. Wang, M., Ma, X., Wang, R., Kari, T., & Tang, Z. (2024). Short-term photovoltaic power prediction model based on hierarchical clustering of K-means++ algorithm and deep learning hybrid model. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 16(2).
[61]. Xu, X., Liao, X., Zhou, T., He, Z., & Hu, H. (2024). Vibration-based identification of lubrication starved bearing using spectral centroid indicator combined with minimum entropy deconvolution. Measurement, 226, 114156.
[62]. Wu, Z., Pan, S., Chen, F., Long, G., Zhang, C., & Yu, P. S. (2020). A comprehensive survey on graph neural networks. IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems, 32(1), 4-24.
[63]. Zhang, S., Tong, H., Xu, J., & Maciejewski, R. (2019). Graph convolutional networks: a comprehensive review. Computational Social Networks, 6(1), 1-23.
[64]. Xiao, L., Yang, X., & Yang, X. (2023). A graph neural network-based bearing fault detection method. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 5286.
[65]. Gilmer, J., Schoenholz, S. S., Riley, P. F., Vinyals, O., & Dahl, G. E. (2017, July). Neural message passing for quantum chemistry. In International conference on machine learning (pp. 1263-1272). Pmlr.
[66]. Kipf, T. N. (2016). Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.02907.
[67]. Zhang, X., Zhang, X., Liu, J., Wu, B., & Hu, Y. (2023). Graph features dynamic fusion learning driven by multi-head attention for large rotating machinery fault diagnosis with multi-sensor data. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 125, 106601.
[68]. Shao, Z., Xie, C., Ning, Z., Wu, Q., Chang, L., Du, Y., & Du, L. (2023). An efficient GCN accelerator based on workload reorganization and feature reduction. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, 71(2), 646-659.
[69]. Ding, S., Chen, R., Liu, H., Liu, F., & Zhang, J. (2024). ASG-HOMGAT: a high-order multi-head graph attention network with adaptive small graph structure for rolling bearing fault diagnosis. Measurement Science and Technology, 35(6), 065018.
[70]. Velickovic, P., Cucurull, G., Casanova, A., Romero, A., Lio, P., & Bengio, Y. (2017). Graph attention networks. stat, 1050(20), 10-48550.
[71]. Hou, R., Zhang, Z., Chen, J., Yang, W., & Liu, F. (2024). Unsupervised graph anomaly detection with discriminative embedding similarity for viscoelastic sandwich cylindrical structures. ISA transactions, 147, 36-54.
[72]. Metra Mess- und Frequenztechnik in Radebeul e.K. (2024). Standard accelerometer KS76C100 [Data sheet]. Retrieved December 1, 2025, from https://mmf.de/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/ks76c100_en.pdf
[73]. PCE Instruments. (2017). PCE-VC 20 vibration process calibrator: User manual [User manual]. Retrieved December 1, 2025, from https://www.pce-instruments.com/english/api/getartfile?_fnr=1782876&_dsp=inline
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101435-
dc.description.abstract內藏式主軸為工具機內高單價且關鍵之核心元件,若能於出廠前確保其製造品質,便可顯著降低交付後因短期異常而引發之問題,進而減少整體經濟損失。因此,建立可於出廠前辨識主軸品質狀態與風險之方法,已成為製造端極需面對之關鍵課題。
本研究聚焦於內藏式主軸跑合工站之無切削負載振動訊號,提出一套可用於出廠品質管制之兩階段智慧化診斷方法,並以產線同型號內藏式主軸 13 支之固定轉速的外殼加速度量測資料進行建構與驗證。由於實務產線往往難以事先確知潛在不良模式,其對應之訊號特徵亦可能微弱且不明確,使得以預先定義故障類別並蒐集充足標註樣本為前提之監督式建模策略難以直接應用,故本研究採取先無監督及後監督之流程設計,以降低對標註資料的依賴並提升可部署性。
第一階段以振動訊號之頻域特徵為核心,透過降維與分群挖掘潛在品質狀態,並以 Davies–Bouldin 指標評估分群品質。為使分群結果能對應實務品管語意,進一步將分群結果與出廠前品質管制紀錄、抽樣耐久性試驗結果及出廠後一年內返廠維修資訊交叉比對,並結合工程師領域知識,建立具工程語意之品質標籤,作為第二階段監督式模型之訓練基礎。第二階段針對小樣本與類別不平衡之產線資料,將時域振動訊號建模為圖結構,引入圖注意力網路進行監督式多類別分類,並與 k-近鄰、支持向量機及圖卷積網路比較。為避免模型效能僅反映同一主軸資料分割之結果,本研究採留一交叉驗證法,以檢驗模型對未知主軸個體之可遷移性與泛化能力;並進一步透過不同訊噪比情境與資料平衡化策略,評估模型於量測雜訊顯著且故障樣本稀缺之條件下之穩健性。
研究結果顯示,在既有品質管制全數放行之前提下,所提流程仍能自出廠前短期振動資料中辨識出與耐久性失效及一年內返修風險相關之高風險個體,凸顯出廠測試訊號於風險辨識上之潛在價值。為促進方法落實於實務流程,本研究進一步建立智慧化品質診斷系統原型,整合資料庫、診斷模型與網頁介面,使檢測人員得以在既有出廠前檢測流程中,直接參考模型輸出之品質評估資訊。綜合而言,本研究以出廠前品質管控為核心,提出並驗證一套適用於標籤匱乏情境之兩階段診斷流程,並透過泛化與抗噪條件之設計評估其工業可用性,初步證實其於內藏式主軸出廠品質判定之應用潛力。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe built-in spindle is a high-value and mission-critical core component in machine tools. If its manufacturing quality can be assured prior to shipment, issues arising from early-life anomalies after delivery can be substantially reduced, thereby mitigating overall economic losses. Accordingly, developing a method capable of identifying spindle quality conditions and associated risks before shipment has become a critical challenge that must be addressed on the manufacturing side.
This study focuses on no-load vibration signals acquired at the built-in spindle run-in station and proposes a two-stage intelligent diagnostic framework for outgoing quality-control (QC). The framework is developed and validated using fixed-speed housing acceleration measurements collected from 13 identical built-in spindles on a production line. In practice, potential defect modes are often unknown in advance, and their signal signatures may be weak or ambiguous, which limits the direct applicability of supervised modeling strategies that require predefined fault categories and sufficiently labeled samples. To reduce reliance on labeled data and improve deployability, this research adopts a sequential unsupervised-then-supervised design.
In Stage I, frequency-domain features are extracted from vibration signals and used to uncover latent quality states via dimensionality reduction and clustering, with the Davies–Bouldin Index employed to assess clustering quality. To align clustering outcomes with practical QC semantics, the discovered clusters are further cross-validated against pre-shipment QC records, results from sampled durability tests, and post-shipment repair/return information within one year, together with domain knowledge from experienced engineers. This process yields engineering-interpretable quality labels that serve as the training basis for Stage II. In Stage II, to address small-sample and class-imbalance characteristics commonly seen in production data, time-domain vibration signals are modeled as graph-structured data and a Graph Attention Network (GAT) is introduced for supervised multiclass classification. The proposed approach is benchmarked against k-nearest neighbors (kNN), support vector machines (SVM), and graph convolutional networks (GCN). To ensure that performance does not merely reflect sample-level splits from the same spindle, leave-one-out cross-validation is conducted to evaluate transferability and generalization to unseen spindle units. Robustness is further examined under different signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) scenarios and data rebalancing strategies, reflecting conditions with substantial measurement noise and scarce failure samples.
The results demonstrate that, even when conventional QC criteria would release all units, the proposed framework can identify high-risk spindles from short-duration pre-shipment vibration data—spindles that are subsequently associated with durability-test failures and increased repair risk within one year. This finding highlights the latent value of outgoing test signals for early risk identification. To facilitate practical adoption, this study also develops a prototype intelligent quality diagnosis system integrating a database, diagnostic models, and a web-based interface, enabling inspectors to directly reference model-derived quality assessments within existing pre-shipment inspection workflows. Overall, this research proposes and validates a two-stage diagnostic pipeline tailored to label-scarce manufacturing settings, and evaluates its industrial feasibility through generalization- and noise-aware designs, thereby providing initial evidence of its applicability for outgoing quality assessment of motorized spindles.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2026-02-03T16:16:01Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2026-02-03T16:16:01Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents誌謝 i
摘要 ii
ABSTRACT iv
目次 vi
圖次 xi
表次 xiv
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 現況與挑戰 4
1.2.1 出廠前品質管控流程 4
1.2.2 主軸之失效機制與品質風險 5
1.2.3 現行品質管制之侷限 8
1.3 文獻回顧 12
1.4 研究目標與貢獻 17
1.4.1 研究目標 17
1.4.2 研究貢獻 18
1.5 研究範圍與限制 21
1.6 論文架構 24
第二章 研究方法 26
2.1 無監督聚類方法 27
2.1.1 快速傅立葉轉換 27
2.1.2 特徵降維處理 31
2.1.2.1 主成分分析 31
2.1.2.2 t-分布隨機鄰近嵌入法 35
2.1.3 K-平均演算法 39
2.1.4 DBI 40
2.1.5 決策邊界與異常偵測機制 42
2.1.5.1 規則1:介於多群邊界之模糊樣本 42
2.1.5.2 規則 2:離群點 43
2.1.5.3 規則 3:穩定群內點 44
2.2 圖神經網路診斷方法 45
2.2.1 圖的定義和類型 45
2.2.1.1 鄰接矩陣 46
2.2.1.2 圖結構的應用與類型 46
2.2.2 深度學習模式比較 49
2.2.2.1 訊息傳遞神經網路一般框架 50
2.2.2.2 圖卷積網路 51
2.2.2.3 圖注意力網路 54
第三章 實驗架構與量測資料說明 57
3.1 主軸規格與實驗流程 57
3.1.1 主軸組裝與跑合工站處理 58
3.1.2 CNC 工廠品質檢驗與耐久性測試 59
3.1.3 出貨與一年內返廠追蹤 61
3.2 實驗儀器介紹 62
3.2.1 振動訊號加速度感測器 62
3.2.2 資料擷取模組 65
3.2.3 加速規振動校正器 67
3.3 量測訊號說明 69
第四章 實驗分析與實例診斷 72
4.1 應用聚類算法於主軸缺陷診斷之建立 72
4.1.1 診斷模型框架 72
4.1.1.1 模型訓練 74
4.1.1.2 診斷流程 75
4.1.2 特徵空間與聚類結構分析 77
4.1.3 聚類結果的穩定性分析 82
4.1.4 頻率與能量特徵之缺陷對應 85
4.1.5 測試集驗證 90
4.1.5.1 驗證步驟流程 91
4.1.5.2 實驗設計與結果 93
4.1.6 小結 94
4.2 應用GAT於主軸缺陷診斷之建立 96
4.2.1 診斷模型框架 96
4.2.2 實驗訊號標籤分組 98
4.2.3 模型架構與訓練參數 99
4.2.3.1 特徵擷取模組 100
4.2.3.2 特徵分類模組 100
4.2.3.3 實作與訓練環境 100
4.2.3.4 訓練超參數 101
4.2.4 GAT模型建模與評估 102
4.2.4.1 時域圖形建模與 GAT 注意力機制之視覺化 102
4.2.4.2 分類能力之評估:訓練損失與準確率分析 103
4.2.4.3 GAT 模型分類效能之測試評估 104
4.2.5 實驗結果與分析 105
4.2.5.1 不同機器學習方法驗證結果之比較分析 105
4.2.5.2 二元分類結果分析 106
4.2.5.3 多類別分類結果分析 107
4.2.5.4 噪聲抗性比較與分析 110
4.2.5.5 資料平衡化實驗與性能比較 116
4.2.5.6 噪聲條件下軸承缺陷類別之深入分析 118
4.2.5.7 圖結構對分類準確率影響之分析與比較 121
4.2.5.8 結果討論 126
4.2.6 模型泛化能力驗證 127
4.2.7 小結 128
4.3 實際流程建立與決策邏輯 130
4.3.1 診斷系統之決策邏輯 131
第五章 診斷系統設計與實現 134
5.1 系統分析與架構規劃 134
5.1.1 研究目標與系統角色定位 134
5.1.2 系統需求分析 135
5.1.3 系統使用技術與架構 139
5.1.4 診斷管線設計與使用情境 141
5.1.5 系統結構設計 143
5.1.6 功能對應與服務清單 146
5.2 系統資料庫設計開發 148
5.2.1 資料庫需求分析 148
5.2.2 資料庫的結構設計 149
5.2.3 查詢模式、索引與擴充性考量 163
5.3 診斷系統實作與介面 165
5.3.1 登入模組 165
5.3.2 主軸、測試與訊號管理介面 169
5.3.3 上傳與診斷介面 172
5.3.4 歷史診斷紀錄介面 175
5.3.5 維修與短期返修管理介面 175
5.3.6 QC 建立與查詢介面 177
5.3.7 診斷模型管理介面 179
5.4 小結 181
第六章 結論與未來展望 182
6.1 結論 182
6.2 未來展望 186
參考文獻 187
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subject內藏式主軸-
dc.subject品質管控-
dc.subject無監督聚類-
dc.subject圖注意力網路-
dc.subject診斷系統-
dc.subjectBuilt-in Spindle-
dc.subjectQuality Control-
dc.subjectUnsupervised Clustering-
dc.subjectGraph Attention Network-
dc.subjectDiagnostic System-
dc.title內藏式主軸智慧化診斷系統應用在品質控制之研究zh_TW
dc.titleA Study on the Application of an Intelligent Diagnostic System for Built-in Spindles in Quality Controlen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear114-1-
dc.description.degree博士-
dc.contributor.coadvisor湯耀期zh_TW
dc.contributor.coadvisorYao-Chi Tangen
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee劉德源;宋家驥;張瑞益;謝傳璋zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeDer-Yuan Liou;Chia-Chi Sung;Ray-I Chang;Chuan-Cheung Tseen
dc.subject.keyword內藏式主軸,品質管控無監督聚類圖注意力網路診斷系統zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordBuilt-in Spindle,Quality ControlUnsupervised ClusteringGraph Attention NetworkDiagnostic Systemen
dc.relation.page196-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202600284-
dc.rights.note未授權-
dc.date.accepted2026-01-28-
dc.contributor.author-college工學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept工程科學及海洋工程學系-
dc.date.embargo-liftN/A-
顯示於系所單位:工程科學及海洋工程學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-114-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
7.66 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved