請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10132
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 范雲 | |
dc.contributor.author | Hung-Fu Tsai | en |
dc.contributor.author | 蔡宏富 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T21:04:21Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-07-26 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T21:04:21Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2011-07-26 | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011-07-08 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Bernstein, Mary (1997). Celebration and Supression: The Strategic Uses of Identity by the Lesbian and Gay Movement. American Journal of Sociology, 103(3), 531-565.
Bernstein, Mary (2002). The Contradictions of Gay Ethnicity: Forging Identiy in Vermont. In David S. Meyer, Nancy Whittier, & Belinda Robnett (Eds.), Social Movements: Identity, culture, and the state. (pp. 85-104). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. Brooke, James (1996). To be young gay, and going to high school in Utah. The New York Times, pp. A1, B8. Calhoun, Cheshire. (1994). Separating Lesbian Theory from Feminist Theory. Ethics, 104(3), 558-581. Calhoun, Cheshire. (1995). The Gender Closet: Lesbian Disappearance under the Sign 'Women'. Feminist Studies, 21(1), 7-34. Calhoun, Cheshire (1997)。同女出走(Leaving Home)(張娟芬譯)。臺北市: 吳氏總經銷 Connell, Robert W (1987). Gender and power : society, the person, and sexual politics. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]: Polity Press. Connell, Robert W and Messerschmidt, W (2005). Hegemonic Masculinity Rethinking the Concept. Gender & Society, 19(6): 829-859. Fanon, Frantz (2007)。黑皮膚,白面具(Peau noire, masques blancs)(陳瑞華譯)。台北市:心靈工坊文化出版。 Fraser, Nancy (2001). Recognition without Ethics? Theory, Culture & Society, 18(2-3), 21-42 Filax, Gloria (2003). Queer Invisiblility: The Case of Ellen, Michel, and Oscar. In S. Books (Ed.), Invisible children in the society and its schools (pp. 147-169). Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates Publishers. Filax, Gloria (2006). Queer youth in the province of the 'severely normal'. Vancouver: UBC Press. Foucault, Michel (1986). The history of sexuality. New York: Pantheon Books. Freire, Paulo (1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum. Gamson, Joshua (1995). Must Identity Movements Self-Destruct? A Queer Dilemma. Social Problems, 42(3), 390-407. Gamson, Joshua (1998). Freaks Talk Back. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Holland, Janet, Ramazanoglu, Caroline and Sharpe, Sue (2004). Learning about sex: The gendering of sexual knowledge. In Holland, Janet, Ramazanoglu, Caroline and Sharpe, Sue (Eds.) The male in the head: Young people, heterosexuality and power. (pp. 51-75). London: The Tufnell Press. Ingraham, Chrys (1994). The Heterosexual Imaginary: Feminist Sociology and Theories of Gender. Sociological Theory, 12(2), 203-219. Ingraham, Chrys (2005). Thinking straight : the power, the promise, and the paradox of heterosexuality. London: Routledge. Nicholson, Linda J. (1995). Interpreting Gender. In L. J. Nicholson & S. Seidman (Eds.), Social postmodernism : beyond identity politics. New York: Cambridge University Press. Polletta, Francesca (2006). 'It Was like a Fever ...' Narrative and Identity in Social Protest Social Problems, Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 137-159 Polletta, Francesca (2006). It Was Like A Fever: Storytelling in Protest and Politics. Chicago University of Chicago Press. Rich, Adrienne (1980). Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence. Signs, 5(4), 631-660. Rofes, Eofes. E (1989). Opening Up the Classroom Closet: Responding to the Educational Needs of Gay and Lesbian Youth. Harvard Educational Review, 59(4), 444-453. Rofes, Eofes. E (2004). Martyr-Target-Victim: Interrogating Narratives of Persecution and Suffering among Queer Youth. In M. L. Rasmussen, E. E. Rofes & S. Talburt (Eds.), Youth and sexualities : pleasure, subversion, and insubordination in and out of schools (pp. 41-62). New York, N.Y.: Palgrave Macmillan. Sayer, Andrew (2008)。階級的道德意義(The Moral Significance of Class)(陳妙芬、萬毓澤譯)。台北市:巨流。 Seidman, Steve (1993). Identity and Politics in a 'Postmodern' Gay Culture: Some Historical and Conceptual Notes. In M. Warner (Ed.), Fear of a queer planet : queer politics and social theory (pp. 105-142). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Smith, George W. (1998). The Ideology of 'Fag': The School Experience of Gay Students. The Sociological Quarterly, 39(2), 309-335. Wittig, Monique (1992). The straight mind and other essays. Boston: Beacon Press. Young, Iris M. (2001). Social Movements and the Politics of Difference. In B. Boxill (Ed.), Race and Racism (pp. 383-418). New York: Oxford University Press. 王怡元 (2004). 在學校體制中女同志族群與非同志族群間族群關係之研究。未出版之碩士論文。臺北市市立師範學院課程與教學研究所。 王儷靜 (2010). Fag意識形態:男同志學生的校園經驗. In 楊幸真 (Ed.), 青少年的性 (pp. 151-173). 台北市: 巨流. 朱偉誠 (1998). 台灣同志運動的後殖民思考:論'現身'問題. 台灣社會研究季刊, 30, 35-62. 何明修 (2005). 社會運動概論. 臺北市: 三民. 陳培驊 (2006). 見與不見-同志現身經驗的研究。未出版之碩士論文。國立東華大學族群關係與文化研究所。 李雪菱 (2007). 從性別課程設計反思基層教師「性別意識」與「多元家庭」觀:以東台灣七所基層學校為例. Paper presented at the 「教與學」學術研討會. 周佑儒 (2007). 大學男同志學生出櫃經驗之敘事分析。未出版之碩士論文。國立暨南國際大學輔導與諮商研究所。 范雲 (2010). 說故事與民主討論:一個公民社會內部族群對話論壇的分析. 台灣民主季刊, 7(1), 65-106 張喬婷 (1999). 異質空間vs.全視空間:台灣校園女同志的記憶、認同與主體性浮現。未出版之碩士論文。國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所。 楊佳羚 (2002). 國中性教育的人類學初探-以性教育論述與課堂實踐為例。未出版之碩士論文。國立清華大學人類學研究所。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10132 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 隨著2004年通過 《性別平等教育法》,性別教育在校園裡如火如荼地展開,當中的同志教育也開始萌芽。但同志議題並非藉由法律的力量就能順利地進入校園,中間的過程還需經過 不同行動者與策略才能完成。本研究以「台灣同志諮詢熱線協會」的教育小組為研究對象,透過實際的校園同志運動經驗,探討和理解法律與實作之間的差距與困境。首先,本研究發現同志教育在整個性別教育當中,仍處於邊緣的位置,此邊緣化的現象並非理所當然,而是實作上就受到課程安排的結構限制。在現實校園中,許多教育者也只把性別教育當成兩性平等,此種以「兩性」平權為核心思維的性別教育觀念無形地邊緣化同志議題。再來,本研究和社會運動中說故事的研究對話,當真實的同志運動者在教室出櫃現身說故事時,我發現在相對不自由的場域,同志運動者說故事會有不同的策略包裝故事,而非真實地訴說自己的生命經驗。在回應與「性」相關的問題時,運動者也有意識地使用轉化議題的技巧,避而不談敏感的情慾。最後,我觀察到運動者在一場接一場的演講中,開始和自己的生命經驗異化,說故事變成是一個抽離的工作。本研究也參考美國酷兒運動的兩種認同路線爭論,試圖分析同志教育在強調差異與強調相似之間的辯證關係,並反思「尊重多元」的精神應立基在差異而非相似。整體而言,儘管同志教育在校園中仍有爭議,但在傳遞「尊重多元」觀念上,同志現身於教室中說故事,仍為一項有力量的對話工具。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | When Gender Equity Education Act was prescribed in 2004, the gender education was starting in schools, including LGBT education. However, it was not successful to practice LGBT education in Taiwan’s schools. It still needs different actors and other strategies to involve this movement. I observed Taiwan Tongzhi hotline association (TTHA) as my object of study. Through the experience of TTHA’s LGBT movement in schools, I want to discuss the gap between the law and practice. First, I find LGBT education was still in a marginal place of the whole gender education. In practice, the school’s curriculum arrangement makes LGBT education in a limited structure, and many educators have just considered gender education as an education of sex equality. Secondly, based on conversation with storytelling in social movement studies, I find gay activist would not tell their true life stories. By using different strategies to change their own life stories, the activists can tell a good and positive story which avoiding bad plots. In response to students’ sexual questions, the activists consciously used transformational assimilation to talk sex without talking desire. Lastly, telling stories in classrooms unceasingly, the activists were aliened with their own life stories. Storytelling becomes an alienated job in the end. Compared with the argument between two gay groups in America queer movement, I try to analysis the dialectic relation between difference and assimilation on LGBT education, and support that “respects diverse gender” should be based on difference. As a whole, though LGBT is controversial in Taiwan, gay storytelling is still a powerful tool in dialogue and communication with heterosexual teachers and students. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T21:04:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R97325002-1.pdf: 1076153 bytes, checksum: ef671472c53eadd786468a9c9460fc35 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論...............................................1
第一節 研究背景與問題......................................1 第二節 文獻回顧............................................6 第三節 研究方法與田野描述.................................15 第四節 章節安排...........................................26 第二章 同志入班演講的結構限制.............................27 第一節 同志教育在性別教育的座標位置.......................28 第二節 打造入班演講的過程.................................41 第三節 教師邀請熱線的動機.................................50 第四節 小結:演講的無形限制...............................57 第三章 現身在教室內的論述戰略.............................61 第一節 說故事作為主策略...................................62 第二節 回應性議題的四種類型...............................75 第三節 異性戀想像的性別流動說.............................88 第四節 小結:「正確的」性別觀念的兩難.....................96 第四章 運動者的情緒與主體性..............................102 第一節 同志何苦為難同志?................................103 第二節 「專業」同志形象的兩難............................108 第三節 演講的不安全感與無力感............................119 第四節 小結:「尊重」與同志主體性的取捨..................123 第五章 結論..............................................129 第一節 研究發現..........................................129 第二節 和理論的對話......................................131 第三節 研究建議..........................................134 第四節 研究限制與可能研究議題............................138 參考文獻.................................................140 附錄.....................................................144 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 在教室說故事的同志運動:同志諮詢熱線的校園同志教育實作分析 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Coming Out and Telling Stories in Classrooms: The Analysis of LGBT Education Movement Led by Taiwan Tongzhi Hotline Association | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蘇芊玲,畢恆達,劉華真 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 同志運動,同志教育,性別平等教育,說故事,尊重, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | LGBT movement,LGBT education,gender equity education,storytelling,respect, | en |
dc.relation.page | 146 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2011-07-08 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 社會學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 社會學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-100-1.pdf | 1.05 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。