請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101134完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 劉仲恩 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | John Chung-En Liu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 蘇心平 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Clayton Su | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-12-14T16:05:11Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-12-15 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-12-13 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-12-08 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Jamieson, L., & 蔡明璋. (2002). 親密關係 : 現代社會的私人關係 / [林.傑米森]Lynn Jamieson著 ; 蔡明璋翻譯及導讀 (一版). 群學.
Zelizer, V. A. R., & 陳難能. (2004). 金錢的社會意義 / 薇薇安娜.齊立澤(Viviana A. Zelizer)作 ; 陳難能譯 (臺初版). 正中. Zelizer, V. A. R., 劉永強, 姚偉, 劉永強, 姚偉, Zelizer, V. A. R., 劉永強, & 姚偉. (2009). 亲密关系的购买 / 薇薇安娜.A.泽利泽(Viviana Zelizer)著 ; 姚伟,刘永强译 (第1版). 上海人民. 王紹蓉 (2022)、 探索行動直播平臺的社會支持因素: 擬社會互動與遠距臨場感觀點. 新聞學研究, (150), 45-95. 何冠毅(2020年11月8日)4女直播主涉詐 「斗內」狂騙30粉絲千萬元。TVBS新聞網,取自:https://news.tvbs.com.tw/local/1413329 吳元熙(2018)。探討內容付費可能性—影音直播平台送禮行為的使用與滿足。國立臺灣大學新聞研究所碩士論文,台北市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/gs56bs 李世暉(2015)。AKB48風潮與日本音樂市場的創新模式:從商品消費到權利消費。全球化與多元文化學報,(3),11-31。 林怡潔、單蔓婷(2021)。中國大陸女性社交直播主的數位勞動與性別政治。新聞學研究,(146),53-95。https://doi.org/10.30386/MCR.202101.0002 陳君毅(2021年4月8日)超級乾爹貢獻5成營收!17LIVE向精品業取經,用小編打動VIP的心。數位時代,取自:https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/62068/17-live-membership-vip 黃厚銘 (2000) 網路人際關係的親疏遠近. 國立台灣大學社會學刊, 28, 119-154. 黄奕航(2018)。中國網路直播的生產與消費:以直播打賞為例。﹝碩士論文。國立政治大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/gzfrpf。 廖明中(2017)。遊戲實況的粉絲經濟及其矛盾。國立臺灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文,台北市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/9chm93 蔡佶良(2017)。遊戲實況的運作機制:閱聽人、社群價值、資本邏輯〔碩士論文,國立交通大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0030-2212201712280994 鍾亞諭(2021)。我是百萬主播:台灣女性娛樂社交直播主的圈粉經營與打賞文化〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202101082 Bandelj, N. (2020). Relational work in the economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 46, 251-272. Chan, C. S. C. (2009). Invigorating the content in social embeddedness: An ethnography of life insurance transactions in China. American Journal of Sociology, 115(3), 712-754. Chen, Y. H., & Roscoe, P. (2017). Practices and meanings of non-professional stock-trading in Taiwan: a case of relational work. Economy and Society, 46(3-4), 576-600. Deterding, S. , Dixon, D. , Khaled, R. , & Nacke, L. E. . (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: defining "gamification". Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments. ACM. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040 Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American journal of sociology, 91(3), 481-510. Hayes, A. (2019). The social meaning of financial wealth: Relational accounting in the context of 401 (k) retirement accounts. Finance and Society, 5(1), 61-83. Haylett, J. (2012). One woman helping another: Egg donation as a case of relational work. Politics & Society, 40(2), 223-247. Horton, D., & Richard Wohl, R. (1956). Mass Communication and Para-Social Interaction: Observations on Intimacy at a Distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049 Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185 Kay Hoang, K. (2011). “She’s not a low-class dirty girl!”: Sex work in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 40(4), 367-396. Lin, L. C. S. (2021). Virtual gift donation on live streaming apps: the moderating effect of social presence. Communication Research and Practice, 7(2), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2021.1889190 Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. (1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 3(2), JCMC321. Mardon, Rebecca, Mike Molesworth, and Georgiana Grigore. "YouTube Beauty Gurus and the emotional labour of tribal entrepreneurship." Journal of Business Research 92 (2018): 443-454. Patrick, M. (2018). Gift exchange or quid pro quo? Temporality, ambiguity, and stigma in interactions between pedestrians and service-providing panhandlers. Theory and Society, 47, 487-509. Thaler, R. H. (1999). Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral decision making, 12(3), 183-206. Wherry, F. F., Seefeldt, K. S., & Alvarez, A. S. (2019). To lend or not to lend to friends and kin: Awkwardness, obfuscation, and negative reciprocity. Social Forces, 98(2), 753-793. Woodcock, J., & Johnson, M. R. (2018). Gamification: What it is, and how to fight it. The Sociological Review, 66(3), 542–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026117728620 Yu, E., Jung, C., Kim, H., & Jung, J. (2018). Impact of viewer engagement on gift-giving in live video streaming. Telematics Informatics, 35, 1450-1460. Zelizer, V. A. (2000). The Purchase of Intimacy. Law & Social Inquiry, 25(3), 817–848. http://www.jstor.org/stable/829137 Zou, S. (2018). Producing value out of the invaluable: A critical/cultural perspective on the live streaming industry in China. TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 16(2), 805-819. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101134 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 在直播平台上,觀眾可以免費觀看並與直播主聊天互動,如果有意願,也能夠透過平台上贈送禮物的功能來打賞(斗內)給自己喜歡的直播主。在免費的前提之下,平台上贈禮的行為還是非常踴躍,不少主播也都收入頗豐。這不禁讓人好奇,為什麼在線上透過螢幕與觀眾互動可以成為一個職業,並且收到觀眾自願的打賞?本文正是要回答主播是怎麼與觀眾互動、讓觀眾自願斗內,以及他們是怎麼維繫這樣的情感關係與經濟交易的並存。
本研究透過對16位主播、5位觀眾以及1位平台主管進行訪談,以及研究者自身的線上參與觀察取得資料。觀察到,在與觀眾互動的層面,主播會透過情緒勞動帶給觀眾四種不同面向的感受,包含氣氛營造、個人化的互動與聯繫、情感的照護以及戀愛感。相對於這些勞動,觀眾則會以平台上的點數、行動的付出或甚至平台之外的經濟交易來回饋給主播。 並且,本研究更進一步指出,要讓這樣的關係能夠成立,有賴於主播與觀眾之間的關係工作,雙方會建立起合宜的交易方式,讓交易具有正當性,達成能夠維繫經濟與情感關係的好交易。因此在平台上,可以區分出所謂的好主播與好觀眾。好主播指的是真心、不因經濟利益而對觀眾差別待遇以及敬業、努力投入於直播工作且不以虛假的戀愛來吸引觀眾的主播;相對主播著重於付出的面向,好觀眾不單單是指能帶給主播利益,更重要的是不會因為其有所付出就對主播有所要求,特別是要求戀愛關係的發展或是更進一步展現控制意圖的戀愛粉。雙方若能體認到彼此的角色,並對互動及交易當中的意義有一致的共識,就可以達成好的斗內,而這樣好的斗內也讓關係能夠延續。而好的交易也不僅限於平台之上,及便是平台之外的現金或實物等不同形式的交易,也可以透過建立不同意義來維繫關係。相對的,不管是刻意營造虛假戀愛關係的直播主與受騙觀眾以及因經濟利益而忍受戀愛粉的直播主這兩種組合,終將因為無法兌現承諾而被戳破以及主播疲於應付觀眾而讓關係瓦解。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Livestreaming platforms allow viewers to watch and interact with streamers for free, yet gifting remains widespread and financially significant. This study asks how screen-mediated interaction becomes labor that elicits donation, and how emotional and economic exchanges are jointly maintained.
Based on interviews with 16 streamers, 5 viewers, and 1 platform operator, supplemented by online participant observation, the study shows that streamers use emotional labor to create four kinds of viewer experience: atmosphere building, personalized connection, emotional care, and romantic intimacy. Viewers reciprocate by donating platform points, offering supportive actions, or engaging in off-platform transactions. The study further highlights that sustaining these relationships requires relational work, through which streamers and viewers define appropriate transactions, allowing economic and emotional aspects to coexist. “Good streamers” are seen as sincere, consistent in treatment, professional, and not reliant on fabricated romance; “good viewers” refrain from demanding romantic return or exerting control despite their contributions. When both sides share expectations and meanings of exchange, donation becomes stable and relationship-supporting. In contrast, interactions grounded in deceptive romance or tolerated controlling fans collapse when expectations cannot be met or the relational burden becomes unsustainable. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-12-14T16:05:11Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-12-14T16:05:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
誌謝 ii 摘要 iii Abstract v 目 次 vi 圖次 vii 第一章、緒論 1 一、前言 1 二、文獻回顧 3 三、研究方法 15 第二章、平台、主播與觀眾 23 一、遊戲化的斗內機制 23 二、程式介面 27 三、主播的類型 31 四、觀眾的類型 34 第三章、主播的勞動 38 一、從素人到主播 40 二、互動、情感取向的內容 47 三、小節 61 第四章、禮物的贈送與接收:關係工作的運作 66 一、金錢交易的負面觀點 67 二、合宜的交易關係 72 三、交易的進行 78 四、平台點數之外的交易 81 五、關係的延續與作用 85 六、小結 87 第五章、結論 90 一、研究發現、貢獻 90 二、研究限制、建議 92 參考文獻 94 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 直播 | - |
| dc.subject | 直播主 | - |
| dc.subject | 情緒勞動 | - |
| dc.subject | 打賞 | - |
| dc.subject | 關係工作 | - |
| dc.subject | live streaming | - |
| dc.subject | Streamer | - |
| dc.subject | Emotional labor | - |
| dc.subject | donation | - |
| dc.subject | Relational work | - |
| dc.title | 直播平台的斗內:主播與觀眾的經濟和情感關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Donations on Live Streaming Platforms: The Economic and Emotional Relationship Between Streamers and Audiences | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 114-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳嘉苓;陳宇翔 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chia-Ling Wu;Yu-Hsiang Chen | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 直播,直播主情緒勞動打賞關係工作 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | live streaming,StreamerEmotional labordonationRelational work | en |
| dc.relation.page | 97 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202404425 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-12-08 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 社會學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2025-12-15 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 社會學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-114-1.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用(校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務) | 2.49 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
