請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101024完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 曾宛如 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Wang-Ruu Tseng | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 魏子軼 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Tzu-I Wei | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-11-26T16:30:52Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-11-27 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-11-26 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-09-15 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文文獻
(一)專書論著 張國興(1991),《台灣戰後勞工問題(上冊)》,現代學術基金會。 衛民、許繼峰(2006),《勞資關係:平衡效率與公平》,前程文化。 衛民、許繼峰(2005),《勞資關係與爭議問題》,國立空中大學。 劉連煜(2021),《現代公司法》,新學林。 劉連煜(2019),《現代證券交易法實例研習》,元照。 (二)書之篇章 陳繼盛(1994),〈勞動者參與企業經營之問題〉,氏著,《勞工法論文集》,陳林法學文教基金會。 (三)期刊論文 王惠玲(1997),〈我國職業工會功能之探討〉,《政大勞動學報》,第6期,頁1-13。 朱德芳(2023),〈上市櫃公司董事薪酬政策揭露-實務運作評析〉,《臺灣財經法學論叢》,第5卷第1期,頁1-61。 余明助(2006),〈組織變革不確定感與員工工作態度關係之研究-以組織溝通和員工信任為中介變數〉,《人力資源管理學報》,第6卷第2期,頁89-110。 林倩如(2014),〈解嚴後台灣勞動體制的發展—新竹科學園區的個案分析〉,《台灣民主季刊》,第11卷第3期,頁85-110。 邱羽凡(2019),〈職業工會適用我國罷工投票規範之研究──德國法制之啟示〉,《交大法學評論》,第4期,頁119-162。 周兆昱(2011),〈現行法下勞資會議決議法律效力之研究:以法院判決評釋為中心〉,《台灣勞動評論》,第3卷第2期,頁165-195。 周振鋒(2019),〈評析 2018 年修正公司法-以董事會、監察人組織與權力行使規範為中心〉,《財產法暨經濟法》,第55期,頁71-99。 莊永丞(2023),〈論我國ESG之揭露法制─從永續報告書揭開ESG面紗〉,《東吳法律學報》,第35卷 第2期,頁1-65。曾宛如(2002),〈董事忠實義務之內涵及適用疑義─評析新修正公司法第二十三條第一項〉,《台灣法學雜誌》,第38期,頁51-66,。 曾宛如(2020),〈公司法制之重塑與挑戰〉,《月旦法學雜誌》,第300期,頁132-141。 葉新民(2013),〈由德國員工參與法制探討我國員工獎勵制度的相關法律問題-以公司法為中心〉,《台北大學法學論叢》,第88期,頁135-208。 劉士豪(2013),〈我國勞工董事法律地位之探討〉,《台灣勞工季刊》,第34期,頁24-38。 (四)學位論文 王振勇(2013),《公司治理制度與經營績效關聯之研究--以國營企業為例》,國立臺灣大學管理學院研究所碩士論文。 王志誠(1998),《論公司員工參與經營之制度-以股份有限公司經營機關之改造為中心》,國立政治大學法律研究所博士論文。 宋函芬(2020),《華航、長榮航空公司罷工事件分析-旅行社角度》,淡江大學企業管理系碩士論文。 沈宜鈴(2003),《我國與德國勞工董事制度之比較研究》,國立中正大學勞工研究所碩士論文。 李若妍(2020),〈平台經濟的商業模式下勞工參與的可行性:以我國內U平台、F平台工作者為核心〉,國立中正大學勞工關係學系研究所碩士論文。 林奕君(2018),〈勞工董事對企業勞資關係與勞工權益影響之探討〉,國立政治大學勞工研究所碩士論文。 吳家淩(2009),《公司治理與勞工參與──日本勞資協議制度之考察》,逢甲大學財經法律研究所碩士論文。 孫大崴(2023),《空洞投票與公司治理》,國立臺灣大學法律學研究所碩士論文。 翁林聖(2007),《企業員工參與制度之研究》,國立政治大學勞工研究所碩士論文。 張緒中(2003),《中華電信工會產業民主實踐之研究》,國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所在職專班碩士論文。 鄭育翔(2015),〈從公司治理論員工權益之保護──以員工代表制檢討為例〉,國立臺灣大學法律研究所碩士論文。 蔡嘉華(2005),《勞工財務參與制度之研究》,國立政治大學勞工研究所碩士論文。 (五)翻譯著作 Raimund Waltermann(著),沈建峰(譯)(2014),《德國勞動法》,法律出版社(簡體字版)。 Zoe Adams & Simon Deakin(著),吳奐廷(譯)(2021),〈公司治理與勞雇關係〉,收於:Jeffrey N. Gordon & Wolf-Georg Ringe(編),《公司法與公司治理(下冊)》,頁1381,新學林。 Zygmunt Bauman(著),陳雅馨(譯)(2018),《液態現代性》,頁234-237,商周。 (六)計畫報告 林佳和(2004),黃世鑫主持,《勞工董事制度之理論與實務》,行政院勞工委員會委託研究報告。 (七)網路資料及其他 BBC中文網(01/28/2022),〈「供應鏈噩夢」纏繞多個產業 2022是否延續?〉,https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/business-60168028。 工商時報(01/22/2024),〈長榮航罷工到底吵什麼?機師訴求、公司聲明一文看懂〉,https://www.ctee.com.tw/news/20240122700900-430503。 中央通訊社(01/22/2024),〈3次國籍航空機師空服罷工 影響旅客逾47萬人次〉,https://www.cna.com.tw/news/ahel/202401220030.aspx。 天下雜誌(06/26/2019),〈長榮空服員罷工大逆轉:工會為什麼可能落到全盤皆輸?〉,https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5095777。 天下雜誌(07/06/2019),〈長榮罷工給台灣上的一課〉,https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5095886。 中央廣播電台(01/22/2024),〈國籍航空業3次罷工 旅行業損失數億嘆不公平〉,https://www.rti.org.tw/news/view/id/2193600。 中央通訊社(11/29/2023),〈回應勞團 侯友宜:增勞工董事、調整勞保基金委外制〉,https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aipl/202311290341.aspx。 立法院網站,〈國營事業勞工董事制度相關問題研析〉,https://www.ly.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=6590&pid=164278。 台灣積體電路製造股份有限公司民國一百一十一年度年報(2023),https://investor.tsmc.com/static/annualReports/2022/chinese/ebook/index.html。 金管會網站,〈2023年上市櫃公司永續發展行動方案(公司治理4.0)新聞稿〉,https://www.fsc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=96&parentpath=0,2&mcustomize=news_view.jsp&dataserno=202303280001&dtable=News。 金管會證券期貨局網站,〈公司治理3.0新聞稿〉,https://www.sfb.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=95&parentpath=0,2&mcustomize=news_view.jsp&dataserno=202008250004&dtable=News。 長榮航空股份有限公司民國111年度年報(2023),https://www.evaair.com/zh-tw/images/Annual-Reports-Year-111-zh_tcm27-85727.pdf。 經濟日報(01/29/2024),〈長榮航機師「不罷工了」勞資達四共識 公司將調整薪資、津貼等〉,https://money.udn.com/money/story/10871/7739569。 經濟部網站,〈現有公司登記家數〉,https://dmz26.moea.gov.tw/GA/common/Common.aspx?code=F&no=1。 臺灣焦點通訊社(06/20/2016),〈工會反罷工,你搞不懂?華航工會是什麼,報給你知!〉,https://eventsinfocus.org/news/748。 勞動部勞動統計查詢網,https://statdb.mol.gov.tw/statiscla/webMain.aspx?sys=210&kind=21&type=1&funid=q050222&rdm=R51611。 勞動部網站,〈國內初次申請上市(櫃)公司檢附勞資會議紀錄相關文件之作法說明〉,https://www.mol.gov.tw/media/tmdlqe01/%E5%9C%8B%E5%85%A7%E5%88%9D%E6%AC%A1%E7%94%B3%E8%AB%8B%E4%B8%8A%E5%B8%82-%E6%AB%83-%E5%85%AC%E5%8F%B8%E6%AA%A2%E9%99%84%E5%8B%9E%E8%B3%87%E6%9C%83%E8%AD%B0%E7%B4%80%E9%8C%84%E7%9B%B8%E9%97%9C%E6%96%87%E4%BB%B6%E4%B9%8B%E4%BD%9C%E6%B3%95%E8%AA%AA%E6%98%8E.pdf?mediaDL=true。 臺灣證交所公司治理中心網站,〈企業永續發展簡介〉,https://cgc.twse.com.tw/front/responsibility。 臺灣證交所公司治理中心網站,〈企業ESG資訊揭露相關規範〉,https://cgc.twse.com.tw/disclosure/listCh。 聯合新聞網(11/29/2023),〈呼籲上市櫃公司設勞工董事!郭倍宏提工會5大權益訴求〉,https://udn.com/news/story/7327/7606893。 二、英文文獻(按字母順序排列) (一)專書論著 ADDISON, JOHN T. (2009), THE ECONOMICS OF CODETERMINATION : LESSONS FROM THE GERMAN EXPERIENCE. BIAGI, MARCO (2002), QUALITY OF WORK AND EMPLOYEE INVOLVEMENT IN EUROPE. BLAIR , MARGARET M. (1995), OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL: RETHINKING CORPORATE GOVERNANCE FOR THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY. BRANNEN, PETER ET AL. (1976), THE WORKER DIRECTORS : A SOCIALOGY OF PARTICIPATION. CHOPER, J., COFFEE, J. & MORRIS, R. (1989), CASES AND MATERIALS ON CORPORATIONS. DALLAS , LYNNE L. (1995), WORKING TOWARD A NEW PARADIGM, PROGRESSIVE CORPORATE LAW. DEAKIN , SIMON (2002), EVOLUTION FOR OUR TIME: A THEORY OF LEGAL MEMETICS. GARY, DESSLER (1997), HUMAN RESOURSE MANAGEMENT . HANSMANN, HENRY (2001), THE OWNERSHIP OF ENTERPRISE. NELSON, R. & WINTER, S.G. (1982), AN EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF ECONOMIC CHANGE. KRUSE, DOUGLAS (1993), PROFIT SHARING: DOES IT MAKE A DIFFERENCE?. SILVER, BEVERLY EVERLY J. (2003), FORCES OF LABOR:WORKERS’MOVEMENTS AND GLOBALIZATION SINCE 1870. (二)書之篇章 Dallas , Lynne L. (1995), Working Toward A New Paradigm, In Progressive Corporate Law (Lawrence E Mitchell ed.), 35-66. Dow, Gregory K. & Putterman, Louis (1999), Why Capital (Usually) Hires Labor : An Assessment of Proposed Explanations, in Employee And Corporate Governance (Margaret M. Blair & Mark J. Roe eds.), 17-35. Freeman, Richard B. & Lazear, Edward P. (1995), An Economic Analysis of Works Councils, in Work Councils: Consultation, Representation, and Cooperation in Industrial Relations (Joel Rogers & Wolfgang Streeck eds.), 27-52. Ireland, Paddy (2001), Defending the Rentier: Corporate Theory and the Reprivatisation of the Public Company, in The Political Economy of the Company (John Parkinson et al eds, 2001), 141-174. Laulom, Sylvaine & Dorssemont, Filip (2015), Fundamental Principles of EWC Directive 2009/38/EC, in Variations on a theme? The implementation of the EWC Recast Directive (Romuald Jagodzinski ed.), 33-67. Levine, D.I. & Tyson, D.L. (1990), Participation, Productivity, and the Firm's Environment, in Paying For Productivity (A.S.Binder ed.), 182-243. Milgrom, Paul & Roberts, John (1990), Bargaining Costs, Influence Costs, and theOrganization of Economic Activity, in Perspectives on Positive Political Economy (J. Alt & K. Shepsle eds.), 57-89. Rogers, Joel & Streeck, Wolfgang (1995), The Study of Works Councils: Concepts and Problems, in Work Councils: Consultation, Representation, and Cooperation in Industrial Relations (Joel Rogers & Wolfgang Streeck eds.), 3-26. Rogers, Joel (1995), United States: Lessons from Abroad and Home, in Work Councils: Consultation, Representation, and Cooperation in Industrial Relations (Joel Rogers & Wolfgang Streeck eds.), 375-410. Streeck, Wolfgang & Vitols, Sigurt (1995), The European Community: Between Mandatory Consultation and Voluntary Information, in Work Councils: Consultation, Representation, and Cooperation in Industrial Relations (Joel Rogers & Wolfgang Streeck eds.), 243-282. Spiegelaere, Stan De ET AL. (2019), Demoncracy at Work, in Benchmarking Working Europe (Maria Jepsen ed.), 67-89. Thelen, Kathleen (2001), Varieties of Labor Politics in the Developed Democracies, in Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (Peter A. Hall &David Soskice eds.), 71-103. Weiss, Manfred (2021), Challenges for Workers’ Participation, in The Collective Dimensions of Employment Relations (Tindara Addabbo et al. eds.), 15-28. (三)期刊論文 Anderson, Sean M. (2009), Risky Retirement Business: How ESOPs Harm the Workers They are Supposed to Help, 41 Loyola University of Chicago Law Journal 1. Anner, Mark (2018), CSR Participation Committees,Wildcat Strikes and the Sourcing Squeeze in Global Supply Chains, 56(1) British Journal of Industrial Relations 75. Bebchuk, Lucian A. & Roe, Mark J. (1999), A Theory of Path Dependence in Corporate Ownership and Governance., 52(1) Stanford Law Review 127. Black, J. Stewart & Gregersen, Hal B. (1997), Participative Decision-Making: An Integration of Multiple Dimensions, 50(7) Human Relations 859. Boatright, John R. (2004), Employee Governance and the Ownership of the Firm , 14(1) Business Ethics Quarterly 1. Bodie, Matthew T. (2015), Income Inequality And Corporate Structure, 45(1) Stetson Law Review 69. Deakin, Simon, Malmberg, Jonas & Sarkar, Prabirjit (2014), How do labour laws affect unemployment and the labour share of national income? The experience of six OECD countries, 1970–2010, 153(1) International Labour Review 1. DeAngelo Harry (1981), Competition and Unanimity, 71(1) American Economic Review 18. Dukes, Ruth (2005), The Origins of the German System of Worker Representation, 19 Historical Studies in Industrial Relations 31. Easterbrook, Frank H. & Fischel, Daniel R. (1989), The Corporate Contract, 89(7) Columbia Law Review 1416. Fama, Eugene F. & Jensen, Michael C. (1983), Separation of Ownership and Control, 26(2) The Journal of Law and Economics 301. Fama, Eugene F. (1980), Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm, 88(2) Journal of Political Economy 288. Gold, Michael (2010), Employee Participation in The EU: The Long And Winding Road to Legislation, 31(4) Economic and Industrial Democracy 31. Gold, Michael & Waddington, Jeremy (2019), Introduction: Board-level employee representation in Europe: State of play, 25(3) European Journal of Industrial Relations 205. Gouda, Sirish Kumar & Saranga, Haritha (2018), Sustainable supply chains for supply chain sustainability: impact of sustainability efforts on supply chain risk, 56(17) International Journal of Production Research 5820. Greenfield, Kent (1998), The Place of Workers in Corporate Law, 39(2) Boston College Law Review 283. Hammer, Tove H. et al. (1991), Worker Representation on Boards of Directors: A Study of Competing Roles, 44(4) Industrial and Labor Relations Reviews 661. Hamer, Brian (1981), Serving Two Masters: Union Representation on Corporate Boards of Directors, 81(3) Columbia Law Review 639. Hansmann, Henry (1993), Worker Participation and Corporate Governance, 43(3) University of Toronto Law Journal 589. Hayden, Grant M. & Bodie, Matthew T. (2021), Codetermination In Theory And Practice, 73(2) Florida Law Review 321. Hirsch, Boris & Mueller, Steffen (2020), Firm Wage Premia, Industrial Relations, and Rent Sharing in Germany, 73(5) Industrial and Labor Relations Reviews 1119. Hirsch, Boris et al. (2010), Works Councils and Separations: Voice, Monopoly, and Insurance Effects, 49(4) Industrial Relations 566. Hobson, Charles J. & Dworkin, James B. (1986), West German Labor Unrest : Are Unions Losing ground to Worker Councils?, 109(2) Monthly Labor Review 46. Jäger, Simon et al. (2021), Labor in The Boardroom, 136(2) The Quarterly Journal of Economics 669. Jäger, Simon et al. (2021), What Does Codetermination Do?, 75(4) Industrial and Labor Relations Review 857. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H. (1976), Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure, 3(4) Journal of Financial Economics 305. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H. (1978), Can the Corporation Survive?, 31(1) Financial Anal. J. 31-32. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H. (1979), Rights and Production Functions: An Application to Labor-Managed Firms and Codetermination, 52(4) The Journal of Business 469. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H. (1995), Specific and General Knowledge and Organizational Structure, 8(2) Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 1. Kaplow, Louis & Shavell, Steven (1994), Why The Legal System Is Less Efficient Than The Income Tax in Redistributing Income, 23(2) The Journal of Legal Studies 667. Kim, E. Han et al. (2018), Labor Representation in Governance as an Insurance Mechanism, 22(4) Review of Finance 1251. Köhler, Holm-Detlev et al. (2015), Three Decades of European Works Councils. A Quantitative Evaluation, 6(11) Warsaw Forum of Economic Sociology 49. Licht, A.N. (2001), The Mother of all Path Dependencies: Toward a Cross-Cultural Theory of Corporate Governance Systems, 26 The Delaware Journal of Corporate Law 147. Macey, Jonathan R. (1991), An Economic Analysis of the Various Rationales for Making Shareholders the Exclusive Beneficiaries of Corporate Fiduciary Duties, 21 Stetson Law Review 23. McDonnell, Brett (2004), Corporate Constituency Statutes and Employee Governance, 30(4) William Mitchell Law Review 1227. McDonnell, Brett H. (2000), ESOP's Failures: Fiduciary Duties When Managers of Employee-Owned Companies Vote to Entrench Themselves, 2000 Columbia Business Law Review 199. McDonnell, Brett H. (2006), Employee Primacy, or Economics Meets Civic Republicanism at Work, 13 Stanford journal of law, business & finance 334. Mueller, Steffen & Stegmaier, Jens (2017), The Dynamic Effects of Works Councils on Labour Productivity: First Evidence from Panel Data, 55(2) British Journal of Industrial Relations 390. Njoya, Wanjiru (2004), Employee Ownership and Efficiency: An Evolutionary Perspective, 33(3) Industrial Law Journal 211. O'Connor, Marleen A. (1993), Human Capital ERA: Reconceptualizing Corporate Law to Facilitate Labor-Management Cooperation ,78(5) Cornell Law Review 899. Ravenscraft, David J. & Scherer, F.M. (1989), The Profitability of Mergers, 7(1) International Journal of Industrial Organization 101. Stiglitz, Joseph E. (1985), Credit Markets and the Control of Capital, 17(2) Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 133. Weinstein, Olivier (2012), Firm, Property and Governance: From Berle and Means to the Agency Theory, and Beyond, 2(2) Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium 1. (四)計畫報告 Adam, Julian B. (2018), Voluntary quits: Do works councils matter? An analysis of the reform of the German Works Constitution Act 2001 (BGPE Discussion Paper No. 179, 2018).FAU BGPE. Blandhol, Christine at al. (2020), Do Employees Benefit From Worker Representation on Corporate Boards? (Working Paper No.28269, 2020).National Bureau of Economic Research. Conchon, Aline (2001), Board-Level Employee Representation Rights In Europe Facts And Trends (ETUI Report 121). European Trade Union Institute. Fulton, Lionel (2019), Board-Level Employee Representation in The UK: Is It Really Coming? Recent Developments And Debates 7 (Research Report No. 55e, 2019). Mitbestimmungsreport. Hansmann, Henry & Kraakman, Reinier (2000), The End of History for Corporate Law (Law and Economics Working Paper No. 235). Yale Law School. Jirjahn, Uwe & Smith, Stephen C. (2017), Nonunion Employee Representation: Theory and the German Experience with Mandated Works Councils (GLO Discussion Paper No. 132).Global Labor Organization. McDonnell, Brett H. (2006), Employee Primacy, or Economics Meets Civic Republicanism at Work (Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-06). The University of Minnesota Law School. Mohrenweiser, Jens (2022), Works Councils (GLO Discussion Paper, No. 1103). Global Labor Organization. Rehfeldt, Udo (2019), Board-level employee representation in France: Recent developments and debates 3-13 (Research Report No. 53e). Mitbestimmungsreport. (五)網路資料及其他 Financial Reporting Council, UK Corporate Governance Code 2018, https://media.frc.org.uk/documents/UK_Corporate_Governance_Code_2018.pdf. Financial Reporting Council, Corporate Governance Code Guidance, https://www.frc.org.uk/library/standards-codes-policy/corporate-governance/corporate-governance-code-guidance/. Financial Reporting Council, UK Corporate Governance Code 2024, https://media.frc.org.uk/documents/UK_Corporate_Governance_Code_2024_kRCm5ss.pdf. Friedman, Milton (1970/09/13), The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits, NEW YORK TIMES. International Labour Organization, Social Dialogue Report 2022:Collective Bargaining for an inclusive,sustainable and resilient recovery , https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/documents/publication/wcms_842807.pdf. Official Website of The European Union, Directive 2002/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council,https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32002L0014. Official Website of The European Union, Directive 2009/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32009L0038 Stakeholder Capitalism and the Pandemic Recovery, Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2020/06/08/stakeholder-capitalism-and-the-pandemic-recovery/ QERY, Trade Unions Worldwide (Apirl 2024), https://qery.no/trade-unions-worldwide/. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101024 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 二十一世紀約已過去四分之一,現代社會是個講求彈性、多元性、瞬時性的全新世界,員工與雇主間的勞動關係,亦已今非昔比,百年前,員工作為企業之勞動資本,多半被固定的上下班時間、上班地點與工作夥伴緊緊綑綁,然而,隨著科技發展成前人難以想像的模樣,現代的勞動關係早已突破百年前的框架,彈性工時、遠距工作、自營工作者等概念的出現與應用,顯示了員工與組織間的關係逐漸模糊,傳統法制中對於勞動關係的規制,可能業已不合時宜。
公司法雖將員工視為公司之利害關係人,卻設定以「契約」作為員工與公司之權利義務約定模式,實際上係將員工視為公司治理之外部人,相對於內部之股東而言。然而,將員工排除於企業經營與公司治理之外,除無法完整利用員工之才能外,亦使員工經常難以理解企業之決策背景,從而產生勞資衝突,因此,「員工參與」之概念由此而生,旨在透過企業將員工納入治理與決策當中,以期提升企業各種層次上之效能。 本文之研究,即在討論以下問題,首先,於理論上,公司治理中是否可以容納員工之參與?其次,我國之法制環境中,有無推動員工參與制度之需求?最後,比較法上有哪些制度,可以作為吾人攻錯之他山之石? | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The twenty-first century has already passed its first quarter, and modern society has evolved into a new world that emphasizes flexibility,diversity, and immediacy. The labor relationship between employees and employers has also undergone significant changes. A century ago, employees, as labor capital for enterprises, were often tightly bound by fixed working hours, work locations, fixed colleagues. However, with technological advancements that have transformed the world in ways unimaginable to previous generations, contemporary labor relations have far exceeded the framework established a century ago. The emergence and application of concepts such as flexible working hours, remote work, and self-employment indicate that the relationship between employees and organizations is increasingly blurred. The traditional legal framework regulating labor relations may no longer be relevant.
Although corporate law regards employees as stakeholders in a company, it establishes a "contract" as the model for defining the rights and obligations between employees and the company, effectively treating employees as external parties to corporate governance, in contrast to internal shareholders. However, excluding employees from business operations and corporate governance not only prevents the full utilization of their talents but also makes it difficult for employees to understand the background of corporate decisions, leading to labor disputes. Consequently, the concept of "employee participation" has emerged, aimed at integrating employees into governance and decision-making processes in order to enhance organizational effectiveness at all levels. The research in this paper seeks to address the following questions: First, theoretically, can employee participation be incorporated into corporate governance? Second, within the context of our legal environment, is there a need to promote employee participation systems? Finally, what comparative legal systems exist that could serve as useful models for us to consider? | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-11-26T16:30:52Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-11-26T16:30:52Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
摘要 iii ABSTRACT iv 目次 vi 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與問題意識 1 第二節 研究範圍 1 第三節 研究方法 2 第四節 論文架構 2 第二章 公司治理理論員工地位之探討 4 第一節 緒言 4 第二節 公司治理的路徑依賴理論 4 第三節 傳統英美模式的公司治理 7 第一項 公司目的理論 8 第二項 公司契約理論與代理理論 9 第三項 為何是資本僱用勞動? 14 第四項 趨同於效率之主張 20 第五項 小結 22 第四節 員工應具有更多公司治理地位之主張 22 第一項 無法以股東模式的普遍性論證其最佳性 22 第二項 員工之權利亦具剩餘性質,且與管理層間同樣存在代理問題 24 第三項 股東模式效率主張之正當性、可比較性與正確性 27 第四項 員工參與公司治理的其它優點 29 第五項 集體決策難題同樣存在於股東模式 30 第五節 本文見解暨本章結論 31 第三章 我國員工參與公司治理現制之評估 34 第一節 緒言 34 第二節 勞資關係概述 34 第一項 傳統視角中的勞資關係 34 第二項 經濟全球化中的勞資關係 35 第三節 員工參與的概念 42 第一項 員工參與的定義 42 第二項 員工參與與工會之關係 43 第三項 員工參與的種類與實踐上之考量 44 第四節 我國員工參與現況分析 51 第一項 航空業罷工事件與竹科零工會現象之省思 51 第二項 我國的工會制度 54 第三項 我國的公司法制與公司治理 55 第四項 我國的員工參與公司治理 62 第五項 小結:法制需求評估 79 第五節 本章結論:自企業永續治理觀點建置員工參與制度 80 第四章 比較法上員工參與制度之研究 83 第一節 緒言 83 第二節 員工代表會(Work councils) 83 第一項 員工代表會的定義 83 第二項 員工代表會的周邊政治 85 第三項 歐盟的員工代表會 88 第四項 德國的員工代表會 93 第五項 德國員工代表會的經濟分析 109 第六項 小結 112 第三節 企業層級員工代表制度(BLER) 113 第一項 BLER在歐陸與英美 113 第二項 德國制度簡介 116 第三項 企業內外利益集團競爭對BLER之影響 121 第四項 BLER的理論與經濟分析 124 第五項 小結 126 第四節 本文見解暨本章結論 127 第一項 改革優先目標:基層之員工參與制度 127 第二項 我國勞資會議改革:以勞資會議做為員工獲取資訊之中心 128 第五章 結論 137 參考書目 139 一、中文文獻 139 二、英文文獻(按字母順序排列) 144 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 公司治理 | - |
| dc.subject | ESG | - |
| dc.subject | 勞資關係 | - |
| dc.subject | 員工參與 | - |
| dc.subject | 員工代表會 | - |
| dc.subject | 企業層級員工代表 | - |
| dc.subject | 共同決定 | - |
| dc.subject | Corporate governance | - |
| dc.subject | ESG | - |
| dc.subject | Labor relationship | - |
| dc.subject | emloyee participation | - |
| dc.subject | work council | - |
| dc.subject | Board Level Employee Representation | - |
| dc.subject | co-determination | - |
| dc.title | 員工在公司法制中之角色與對公司治理之影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Role of Employees in Corporate Legal Frameworks and Their Impact on Corporate Governance | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 114-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳肇鴻;郭大維 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chao Hung Chen;Ta-Wei Kuo | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 公司治理,ESG勞資關係員工參與員工代表會企業層級員工代表共同決定 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Corporate governance,ESGLabor relationshipemloyee participationwork councilBoard Level Employee Representationco-determination | en |
| dc.relation.page | 154 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202504469 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-09-15 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 法律學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 法律學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2025-11-27 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 法律學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-114-1.pdf | 3.67 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
