Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 醫學院
  3. 物理治療學系所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/99953
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor徐瑋勵zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorWei-Li Hsuen
dc.contributor.author王序閔zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorShiu-Min Wangen
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-22T16:07:30Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-23-
dc.date.copyright2025-09-22-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.date.submitted2025-07-11-
dc.identifier.citationLaudner, K., et al., The relationship between clinically measured hip rotational motion and shoulder biomechanics during the pitching motion. J Sci Med Sport, 2015. 18(5): p. 581-4.
2. Chu, S.K., et al., The kinetic chain revisited: New concepts on throwing mechanics and injury. Pm r, 2016. 8(3 Suppl): p. S69-77.
3. Gilmer, G.G., et al., The role of lumbopelvic-hip complex stability in softball throwing mechanics. J Sport Rehabil, 2019. 28(2): p. 196-204.
4. Fortenbaugh, D., G.S. Fleisig, and J.R. Andrews, Baseball pitching biomechanics in relation to injury risk and performance. Sports Health, 2009. 1(4): p. 314-20.
5. Escamilla, R.F., et al., Effects of a 4-week youth baseball conditioning program on throwing velocity. J Strength Cond Res, 2010. 24(12): p. 3247-54.
6. Escamilla, R.F., et al., Comparison of three baseball-specific 6-week training programs on throwing velocity in high school baseball players. J Strength Cond Res, 2012. 26(7): p. 1767-81.
7. Chaudhari, A.M., et al., Lumbopelvic control and pitching performance of professional baseball pitchers. J Strength Cond Res, 2011. 25(8): p. 2127-32.
8. Oliver, G.D. and D.W. Keeley, Pelvis and torso kinematics and their relationship to shoulder kinematics in high-school baseball pitchers. J Strength Cond Res, 2010. 24(12): p. 3241-6.
9. Laudner, K.G., R. Wong, and K. Meister, The influence of lumbopelvic control on shoulder and elbow kinetics in elite baseball pitchers. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2019. 28(2): p. 330-334.
10. Laudner, K., et al., Lumbopelvic control and the development of upper extremity injury in professional baseball pitchers. Am J Sports Med, 2021. 49(4): p. 1059-1064.
11. Harbour, E., et al., Step-adaptive sound guidance enhances locomotor-respiratory coupling in novice female runners: A proof-of-concept study. Front Sports Act Living, 2023. 5: p. 1112663.
12. Taylor, J.B., et al., Real-time optimized biofeedback utilizing sport techniques (robust): A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2017. 18(1): p. 71.
13. Zhang, X., et al., Wearables, biomechanical feedback, and human motor-skills’ learning & optimization. Applied Sciences, 2019. 9(2): p. 226.
14. Pustišek, M., et al., The role of technology for accelerated motor learning in sport. Pers Ubiquitous Comput, 2021. 25(6): p. 969-978.
15. Hribernik, M., et al., Review of real-time biomechanical feedback systems in sport and rehabilitation. Sensors (Basel), 2022. 22(8).
16. Fares, M.Y., et al., Upper limb injuries in major league baseball. Phys Ther Sport, 2020. 41: p. 49-54.
17. Posner, M., et al., Epidemiology of major league baseball injuries. Am J Sports Med, 2011. 39(8): p. 1676-80.
18. Saltzman, B.M., et al., How many innings can we throw: Does workload influence injury risk in major league baseball? An analysis of professional starting pitchers between 2010 and 2015. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2018. 27(8): p. 1386-1392.
19. Marshall, N.E., et al., Epidemiology, workload, and performance of major league baseball pitchers placed on the disabled list. Orthopedics, 2018. 41(3): p. 178-183.
20. Escamilla, R.F., et al., Biomechanical comparisons among fastball, slider, curveball, and changeup pitch types and between balls and strikes in professional baseball pitchers. Am J Sports Med, 2017. 45(14): p. 3358-3367.
21. Hirashima, M., et al., Kinetic chain of overarm throwing in terms of joint rotations revealed by induced acceleration analysis. J Biomech, 2008. 41(13): p. 2874-2883.
22. Chaudhari, A.M., et al., Lumbopelvic control and days missed because of injury in professional baseball pitchers. Am J Sports Med, 2014. 42(11): p. 2734-40.
23. Conte, S., C.L. Camp, and J.S. Dines, Injury trends in major league baseball over 18 seasons: 1998-2015. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ), 2016. 45(3): p. 116-23.
24. Oberlander, M.A., M.A. Chisar, and B. Campbell, Epidemiology of shoulder injuries in throwing and overhead athletes. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev, 2000. 8(2): p. 115-123.
25. Dick, R., et al., Descriptive epidemiology of collegiate men's baseball injuries: National collegiate athletic association injury surveillance system, 1988-1989 through 2003-2004. J Athl Train, 2007. 42(2): p. 183-93.
26. Fleisig, G.S., et al., Kinetic comparison among the fastball, curveball, change-up, and slider in collegiate baseball pitchers. Am J Sports Med, 2006. 34(3): p. 423-30.
27. MacWilliams, B.A., et al., Characteristic ground-reaction forces in baseball pitching. Am J Sports Med, 1998. 26(1): p. 66-71.
28. Fleisig, G.S., et al., Kinetics of baseball pitching with implications about injury mechanisms. Am J Sports Med, 1995. 23(2): p. 233-9.
29. Sabick, M.B., et al., Humeral torque in professional baseball pitchers. Am J Sports Med, 2004. 32(4): p. 892-8.
30. Camp, C.L., et al., The relationship of throwing arm mechanics and elbow varus torque: Within-subject variation for professional baseball pitchers across 82,000 throws. Am J Sports Med, 2017. 45(13): p. 3030-3035.
31. Aguinaldo, A.L. and H. Chambers, Correlation of throwing mechanics with elbow valgus load in adult baseball pitchers. Am J Sports Med, 2009. 37(10): p. 2043-8.
32. Wight, J., J. Richards, and S. Hall, Influence of pelvis rotation styles on baseball pitching mechanics. Sports Biomech, 2004. 3(1): p. 67-83.
33. Oyama, S., et al., Improper trunk rotation sequence is associated with increased maximal shoulder external rotation angle and shoulder joint force in high school baseball pitchers. Am J Sports Med, 2014. 42(9): p. 2089-94.
34. Noda, I., et al., Relationship between medial elbow pain, flexor pronator muscles, and the ulnar nerve in baseball players using ultrasonography. Healthcare (Basel), 2022. 11(1).
35. Solomito, M.J., E.J. Garibay, and C.W. Nissen, Deceleration phase elbow varus moments: A potential injury mechanism for collegiate baseball pitchers. Sports Biomech, 2021. 20(5): p. 629-638.
36. Burkhart, S.S., C.D. Morgan, and W.B. Kibler, The disabled throwing shoulder: Spectrum of pathology part i: Pathoanatomy and biomechanics. Arthroscopy, 2003. 19(4): p. 404-20.
37. Wilk, K.E., K. Meister, and J.R. Andrews, Current concepts in the rehabilitation of the overhead throwing athlete. Am J Sports Med, 2002. 30(1): p. 136-51.
38. Cain, E.L., Jr., et al., Elbow injuries in throwing athletes: A current concepts review. Am J Sports Med, 2003. 31(4): p. 621-35.
39. Laudner, K.G., R.C. Sipes, and J.T. Wilson, The acute effects of sleeper stretches on shoulder range of motion. J Athl Train, 2008. 43(4): p. 359-63.
40. Litchfield, R., et al., Rehabilitation for the overhead athlete. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 1993. 18(2): p. 433-41.
41. Limpisvasti, O., N.S. ElAttrache, and F.W. Jobe, Understanding shoulder and elbow injuries in baseball. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2007. 15(3): p. 139-47.
42. Scarborough, D.M., et al., Kinematic sequence patterns in the overhead baseball pitch. Sports Biomech, 2020. 19(5): p. 569-586.
43. Chalmers, P.N., et al., The relationship between pitching mechanics and injury: A review of current concepts. Sports Health, 2017. 9(3): p. 216-221.
44. Sakata, J., et al., Throwing injuries in youth baseball players: Can a prevention program help? A randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med, 2019. 47(11): p. 2709-2716.
45. Sakata, J., et al., Efficacy of a prevention program for medial elbow injuries in youth baseball players. Am J Sports Med, 2018. 46(2): p. 460-469.
46. Putnam, C.A., Sequential motions of body segments in striking and throwing skills: Descriptions and explanations. J Biomech, 1993. 26 Suppl 1: p. 125-35.
47. Laudner, K.G., et al., Descriptive profile of lumbopelvic control in collegiate baseball pitchers. J Strength Cond Res, 2018. 32(4): p. 1150-1154.
48. Yildirim, P. and A. Gultekin, The effect of a stretch and strength-based yoga exercise program on patients with neuropathic pain due to lumbar disc herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2022. 47(10): p. 711-719.
49. Plummer, H.A. and G.D. Oliver, The relationship between gluteal muscle activation and throwing kinematics in baseball and softball catchers. J Strength Cond Res, 2014. 28(1): p. 87-96.
50. Krause, D.A. and J.H. Hollman, Electromyographic analysis of hip muscle activation during a single limb squat lateral slide exercise. Int J Sports Phys Ther, 2020. 15(5): p. 755-762.
51. Ben Kibler, W. and A. Sciascia, Kinetic chain contributions to elbow function and dysfunction in sports. Clin Sports Med, 2004. 23(4): p. 545-52, viii.
52. Claudino, J.G., et al., The countermovement jump to monitor neuromuscular status: A meta-analysis. J Sci Med Sport, 2017. 20(4): p. 397-402.
53. Heishman, A.D., et al., Countermovement jump reliability performed with and without an arm swing in ncaa division 1 intercollegiate basketball players. J Strength Cond Res, 2020. 34(2): p. 546-558.
54. Riemann, B.L. and S.M. Lephart, The sensorimotor system, part i: The physiologic basis of functional joint stability. J Athl Train, 2002. 37(1): p. 71-9.
55. Allet, L., et al., Neuromuscular control mechanisms during single-leg jump landing in subacute ankle sprain patients: A case control study. Pm r, 2017. 9(3): p. 241-250.
56. Fransz, D.P., et al., A systematic review and meta-analysis of dynamic tests and related force plate parameters used to evaluate neuromusculoskeletal function in foot and ankle pathology. Clin Biomech, 2013. 28(6): p. 591-601.
57. Colby, S.M., et al., Lower limb stability with acl impairment. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 1999. 29(8): p. 444-51; discussion 452-4.
58. Alahakone, A.U. and A. Senanayake, A real-time interactive biofeedback system for sports training and rehabilitation. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part P-J Sport Eng Technol, 2010. 224(2): p. 181-190.
59. Benjaminse, A., et al., Optimization of the anterior cruciate ligament injury prevention paradigm: Novel feedback techniques to enhance motor learning and reduce injury risk. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 2015. 45(3): p. 170-82.
60. Giggins, O.M., U.M. Persson, and B. Caulfield, Biofeedback in rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2013. 10: p. 60.
61. Gomaz, L., et al., Individualised ball speed prediction in baseball pitching based on imu data. Sensors (Basel), 2021. 21(22).
62. Chaudhari, A.M., et al., Lumbopelvic control and days missed because of injury in professional baseball pitchers. Am J Sports Med, 2014. 42(11): p. 2734-40.
63. Bruijn, S.M., et al., Is slow walking more stable? J Biomech, 2009. 42(10): p. 1506-1512.
64. Graham, R.B., E.M. Sadler, and J.M. Stevenson, Local dynamic stability of trunk movements during the repetitive lifting of loads. Hum Mov Sci, 2012. 31(3): p. 592-603.
65. Pelegrinelli, A.R.M., et al., Lower limb inter-joint coordination in individuals with osteoarthritis before and after a total knee arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2022. 100: p. 105806.
66. Wei, L., et al., Comparing cadence-based and machine learning based estimates for physical activity intensity classification: The uk biobank. J Sci Med Sport, 2024. 27(8): p. 551-556.
67. Bernstein, D.N., et al., Pediatric promis computer adaptive tests are highly correlated with adult promis computer adaptive tests in pediatric sports medicine patients. Am J Sports Med, 2020. 48(14): p. 3620-3625.
68. Cheng, Y.S., et al., Perturbation-based balance training in postoperative individuals with degenerative cervical myelopathy. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2020. 8: p. 108.
69. Cruz-Montecinos, C., et al., Changes in muscle activity patterns and joint kinematics during gait in hemophilic arthropathy. Front Physiol, 2019. 10: p. 1575.
70. Yoshioka, S., et al., Computation of the kinematics and the minimum peak joint moments of sit-to-stand movements. Biomed Eng Online, 2007. 6: p. 26.
71. Irawan, D.S., et al., Concurrent validity and reliability of two-dimensional frontal plane knee measurements during multi-directional cutting maneuvers. Int J Sports Phys Ther, 2022. 17(2): p. 148-155.
72. Glatthorn, J.F., et al., Validity and reliability of optojump photoelectric cells for estimating vertical jump height. J Strength Cond Res, 2011. 25(2): p. 556-60.
73. Buchheit, M., et al., Reliability, usefulness, and validity of the 30–15 intermittent ice test in young elite ice hockey players. J Strength Cond Res, 2011. 25(5): p. 1457-1464.
74. Heishman, A., et al., The influence of countermovement jump protocol on reactive strength index modified and flight time: Contraction time in collegiate basketball players. Sports (Basel), 2019. 7(2).
75. Mayberry, J., S. Mullen, and S. Murayama, What can a jump tell us about elbow injuries in professional baseball pitchers? Am J Sports Med, 2020. 48(5): p. 1220-1225.
76. Fransz, D.P., et al., The effect of the stability threshold on time to stabilization and its reliability following a single leg drop jump landing. J Biomech, 2016. 49(3): p. 496-501.
77. Reinold, M.M., et al., Effect of a 6-week weighted baseball throwing program on pitch velocity, pitching arm biomechanics, passive range of motion, and injury rates. Sports Health, 2018. 10(4): p. 327-333.
78. Zouhal, H., et al., Effects of neuromuscular training on agility performance in elite soccer players. Front Physiol, 2019. 10: p. 947.
79. Nibali, M.L., et al., Influence of familiarization and competitive level on the reliability of countermovement vertical jump kinetic and kinematic variables. J Strength Cond Res, 2015. 29(10): p. 2827-35.
80. Pryhoda, M.K. and M.B. Sabick, Lower body energy generation, absorption, and transfer in youth baseball pitchers. Front Sports Act Living, 2022. 4: p. 975107.
81. Machado, E.M., et al., Association of trunk and lower limb factors with shoulder complaints and sport performance in overhead athletes: A systematic review including grade recommendations and meta-analysis. Phys Ther Sport, 2023. 60: p. 112-131.
82. Hsu, W.L., et al., Balance control in elderly people with osteoporosis. J Formos Med Assoc, 2014. 113(6): p. 334-9.
83. Wang, S.M., et al., Effect of repetitive pitching on the control of lower extremity joints and center of mass in collegiate baseball pitchers. Sports Health, 2024: p. 19417381241273264.
84. Albiero, M.L., et al., Hip strength and pitching biomechanics in adolescent baseball pitchers. J Athl Train, 2023. 58(3): p. 271-278.
85. Gomaz, L., et al., Predicting elbow load based on individual pelvis and trunk (inter)segmental rotations in fastball pitching. Sports Biomech, 2024: p. 1-16.
86. Mavor, M.P., et al., Validation of an imu suit for military-based tasks. Sensors (Basel), 2020. 20(15).
87. Bessone, V., et al., Validation of a new inertial measurement unit system based on different dynamic movements for future in-field applications. Sports Biomech, 2022. 21(6): p. 685-700.
88. Ruiz-Malagón, E.J., et al., Runscribe sacral gait lab™ validation for measuring pelvic kinematics during human locomotion at different speeds. Sensors (Basel), 2023. 23(5).
89. Whiteley, R., Baseball throwing mechanics as they relate to pathology and performance - a review. J Sports Sci Med, 2007. 6(1): p. 1-20.
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/99953-
dc.description.abstract研究背景:棒球投手在比賽中經常面臨由於重複動作與高強度所導致的投擲傷害風險。研究指出,腰椎骨盆區域為投球動作的核心連結,負責將下肢產生的力量有效傳遞至上肢。若控制不良,將導致能量傳遞中斷、動作代償與受傷風險上升。雖已有多項訓練方法針對腰椎骨盆控制設計,惟多數缺乏即時回饋機制,限制其訓練效果。
研究目的:
本研究有三個目的如下,目的一為探討腰椎骨盆控制對於棒球投手投球表現之影響;目的二為探究腰椎骨盆控制訓練之即時生物回饋系統之效度和信度;目的三為確定即時生物回饋腰椎骨盆控制訓練對於改善棒球投手之腰椎骨盆控制和投球表現之效果。
研究設計:橫斷式研究,控制實驗研究,以及前瞻式介入研究
研究方法:
本研究方法分述如下,目的一方法是棒球投手將接受腰椎骨盆控制測試和投球球速之評估;目的二方法是比對受試者在即時生物回饋系統和光學動作分析系統下,在腰椎骨盆動作時系統量測之信效度;目的三方法是將所招募之棒球投手分配到有即時回饋組及無即時回饋組。兩組受試者將接受為期六週之腰椎骨盆控制訓練。
 
研究結果與討論:
目的一研究結果顯示,跨步腳側的腰椎骨盆控制穩定度與投球速度呈高度相關,穩定度愈佳者球速愈快。目的二研究結果顯示,所開發之即時生物回饋系統與光學系統在骨盆三個方向的角度皆有中度至高度相關,且測量具良好之重測信度。目的三研究結果顯示,經過六週訓練後,即時回饋組在單腳橋式、單腳站立、下肢神經肌肉表現與投球速度等指標皆有顯著進步,特別是在骨盆穩定性與偏移角度控制方面,表現優於無即時回饋組。雖然球速明顯提升,但肘部負荷指標並未增加,顯示本訓練可在不加重肘部負擔的情況下有效促進投球表現與動作控制能力的提升。本研究發現整合即時回饋機制之訓練可作為動作控制調整與運動表現監控之依據,未來亦具潛力應用於投擲運動員之傷害預防與傷後復健介入中。
結論:本研究證實,腰椎骨盆控制能力與棒球投手的投球表現高度相關。研究中所研發的即時生理回饋系統,展現出良好的效度與信度。進一步地,將此系統應用於投手訓練中,經六週的訓練後,可顯著提升骨盆控制能力、下肢神經肌肉表現及投球速度。由此可見,系統具備作為投手訓練與傷害預防之臨床工具的潛力。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractBackground: Baseball pitchers are at a higher risk of overuse injuries because they frequently perform repetitive, high-intensity motions. The lumbopelvic region is a crucial link in the kinetic chain, allowing efficient force transmission from the lower body to the upper body during pitching. Poor lumbopelvic control may interrupt this transmission, impair performance, and increase injury risk. While various training strategies target this region, most lack real-time biomechanical feedback to guide corrective adjustments.
Aim:
The aims of this study are as follows. Aim 1 is to determine the effects of lumbopelvic control on pitching performance in baseball pitchers; Aim 2 is to investigate the validity and reliability of the real-time biofeedback system for lumbopelvic control training; Aim 3 is to determine the effectiveness of a real-time biofeedback training for lumbopelvic control on improving lumbopelvic control and pitching performance in baseball pitchers.
Design: Cross-sectional, controlled laboratory, and prospective interventional study
 
Methods:
The methods of this study were as follows. Aim 1 was that baseball pitchers underwent the assessments of lumbopelvic control and pitching performance; Aim 2 was that participants performed the lumbopelvic control movements under the real-time biofeedback system and the optical motion analysis system; Aim 3 was that baseball pitchers were assigned to either the real-time biofeedback group or the non-biofeedback group. Both groups engaged in a six-week program focusing on lumbopelvic control.
Results and discussion:
For Aim 1, frontal plane lumbopelvic control of the stride leg showed a strong correlation with pitching velocity, indicating that better pelvic stability was associated with higher ball speed. For Aim 2, the real-time biofeedback system demonstrated moderate to strong correlations with the optical motion analysis system and showed excellent test-retest reliability across the sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes. For Aim 3, after the six-week intervention, the real-time biofeedback group showed significant improvements in single-leg bridge, single-leg stance, lower limb neuromuscular performance, and pitching velocity. Importantly, although the pitching speed increased notably, there was no corresponding rise in elbow joint load. This suggests that the training successfully improved pitching performance and motor control while avoiding additional stress on the elbow joint. These results highlight the potential of integrating real-time feedback into training programs as a foundation for improving movement control and monitoring athletic performance. Moreover, such an approach may be valuable for injury prevention and post-injury rehabilitation in throwing athletes.
Conclusions: This study established a strong connection between lumbopelvic control and pitching performance in baseball pitchers. The real-time biofeedback system developed in this research demonstrated good validity and reliability. Furthermore, when incorporated into a six-week training program, the system effectively improved pelvic control, lower limb neuromuscular performance, and pitching velocity. These findings indicate that the system could be a valuable clinical tool for training pitchers and preventing injuries.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-09-22T16:07:30Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2025-09-22T16:07:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents論文口試委員會審定書 i
謝辭 ii
中文摘要 iii
ABSTRACT v
Contents viii
INDEX OF TABLE xiii
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1
Knowledge gap for Aim 1 2
Knowledge gap for Aim 2 6
Knowledge gap for Aim 3 8
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 10
2.1 Pitching injuries in baseball pitchers 10
2.1.1) Epidemiology 10
2.1.2) Pathology 11
2.1.3) Preventive training 13
2.2 Lumbopelvic control ability 14
2.2.1) Assessments 15
2.2.2) Training 17
2.3 Neuromuscular performance assessments 18
2.3.1) Countermovement jump 19
2.3.2) Single leg jump 19
2.4 Real-time biofeedback in sports 20
Research questions 22
Study purposes 23
Hypotheses 24
CHAPTER 3 METHODS 25
3.1 Study of Aim 1 25
3.1.1) Participants 25
3.1.2) Study procedure 25
3.1.3) Data processing 29
3.1.4) Statistical analysis 32
3.2 Study of Aim 2 33
3.2.1) Participants 33
3.2.2) Study procedure 33
3.2.3) Real-time biofeedback system for lumbopelvic control training 35
3.2.4) Data processing 38
3.2.5) Statistical analysis 39
3.3 Study of Aim 3 41
3.3.1) Participants 41
3.3.2) Study procedure 41
3.3.3) Training protocols 46
3.3.4) Real-time biofeedback system for lumbopelvic control training 47
3.3.5) Data processing 51
3.3.6) Statistical analysis 54
CHAPTER 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 55
4.1 Study of Aim 1 55
4.1.1) Results 55
4.1.2) Discussion 58
4.1.3) Clinical implications 63
4.2 Study of Aim 2 64
4.2.1) Results 64
4.2.2) Discussion 68
4.2.3) Clinical implications 71
4.3 Study of Aim 3 72
4.3.1) Results 72
4.3.2) Discussion 79
4.3.3) Clinical implications 83
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSIONS 85
REFERENCES 87
APPENDICES 118
Appendix 1 Research approval 118
Appendix 2 Consent form 121
Appendix 3 U.S. Patent Application 130

 
INDEX OF FIGURES
Fig. 1 The theoretical framework for Aim 1. 94
Fig. 2 The theoretical framework for Aim 2. 95
Fig. 3 The theoretical framework for Aim 3. 96
Fig. 4. Study procedure for Aim 1. 97
Fig. 5. Data processing for picking pitching events and peak angular velocity of the pelvic and sternum. 98
Fig. 6. Study procedure for Aim 2. 99
Fig. 7. Retro-reflective marker placements in Vicon system. 100
Fig. 8. Placement of IMU covering the anterior and posterior superior iliac spines in the real-time biofeedback system for lumbopelvic control training. 101
Fig. 9. Lumbopelvic control movements: (a) lateral slide exercise, and (b) single-leg squat exercise. 102
Fig. 10. Study procedure for Aim 3. 103
Fig. 11. Neuromuscular performance measurements: (a) countermovement jump, (b) single-leg jump landing. 104
Fig. 12. Training movements in real-time biofeedback system for lumbopelvic control training: (a) cat and dog exercise, (b) single-leg bridge exercise, (c) lateral slide exercise, and (d) single-leg squat exercise. 105
Fig. 13. Data processing for countermovement jump (CMJ). 106
Fig. 14. Data processing for single-leg jump landing. 107
Fig. 15. The relationship between lumbopelvic control at the pre-pitching stage and pitching performance in Aim1. 108
Fig. 16. The relationship between lumbopelvic stability at the pitching stage and pitching performance in Aim 1. 109
Fig. 17. The relationship between lumbopelvic coordination at the pitching stage and pitching performance in Aim 1. 110
Fig. 18. Bland–Altman plot with 95% limits of agreement (dashed lines) and the mean difference (solid red line) between the real-time biofeedback system and Vicon for lateral slide exercise. 111
Fig. 19. Bland–Altman plot with 95% limits of agreement (dashed lines) and the mean difference (solid red line) between the real-time biofeedback system and Vicon for single leg squat. 112

 
INDEX OF TABLES
Table 1. Pearson’s correlation coefficients of the real-time biofeedback system for lumbopelvic control training and VICON pelvic angle measurements in Aim 2. 113
Table 2. Test-retest reliability of real-time biofeedback system for lumbopelvic control training in pelvic angle measurements in Aim 2. 114
Table 3. The change of lumbopelvic control in the functional test before and after training for each group in Aim 3. 115
Table 4. The change of neuromuscular performance before and after training for each group in Aim 3. 116
Table 5. The change of lumbopelvic control, elbow loading indicator, and pitching velocity during pitching motion before and after training for each group in Aim3. 117
-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject腰椎骨盆控制zh_TW
dc.subject棒球投手zh_TW
dc.subject動作控制訓練zh_TW
dc.subject投球表現zh_TW
dc.subject即時生物回饋zh_TW
dc.subjectreal-time biofeedbacken
dc.subjectpitching performanceen
dc.subjectmotion control trainingen
dc.subjectlumbopelvic controlen
dc.subjectbaseball pitchersen
dc.title透過腰骨盆控制增進投球表現:棒球投手之評估、訓練系統開發與訓練成效zh_TW
dc.titleEnhancing Pitching Performance Through Lumbopelvic Control: Evaluation, Training System Development, and Training Effects in Baseball Pitchersen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear113-2-
dc.description.degree博士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee相子元;吳育任;郭柏齡;陳星宇zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeTzyy-Yuang Shiang;Yuh-Renn Wu;Po-Ling Kuo;Hsing-Yu Chenen
dc.subject.keyword棒球投手,腰椎骨盆控制,即時生物回饋,投球表現,動作控制訓練,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordbaseball pitchers,lumbopelvic control,real-time biofeedback,pitching performance,motion control training,en
dc.relation.page130-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202501757-
dc.rights.note未授權-
dc.date.accepted2025-07-14-
dc.contributor.author-college醫學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept物理治療學研究所-
dc.date.embargo-liftN/A-
顯示於系所單位:物理治療學系所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-113-2.pdf
  未授權公開取用
7 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved