請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/99746完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 岳修平 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Hsiu-Ping Yueh | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 郭蕎菱 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Chiao-Ling Kuo | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-17T16:33:39Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-09-18 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-09-17 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-08-05 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. Ajzen, I. (2006). Constructing a TPB questionnaire: Conceptual and methodological considerations. University of Massachusetts Amherst. Akkaya, D., Bimpikis, K., & Lee, H. (2021). Government interventions to promote agricultural innovation. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 23(2), 437-452. Aldanondo Ochoa, A. M., Casanovas Oliva, V., & Almansa Sáez, C. (2007). Explaining farm succession: the impact of farm location and off-farm employment opportunities. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 5(2), 214-225. Alston, M. (2004). Who is down on the farm? Social aspects of Australian agriculture in the 21st century. Agriculture and Human Values, 21, 37-46. Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511435355 Bjornskov, C., & Holm, A. (2010). Farm succession: Who will take over the farm? Journal of Rural Studies, 26(3), 267-279. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture (R. Nice, Trans.). SAGE Publications. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture (R. Nice, Trans.). SAGE Publications. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste (R. Nice, Trans.). Harvard University Press. Bower, G. H., Black, J. B., & Turner, T. J. (1979). Scripts in memory for text. Cognitive Psychology, 11(2), 177-220. Brandth, B., & Overrein, G. (2021). Resourcing children in a changing rural context: Fathering and farm succession in two generations of farmers. Sociologia Ruralis, 53(1), 95-111. Burton, R. J., & Walford, N. (2005). Multiple succession and land division on family farms in the South East of England: A counterbalance to agricultural concentration? Journal of Rural Studies, 21(3), 335-347. Burton, R. J., Forney, J., Stock, P., & Sutherland, L. A. (2020). The good farmer: Culture and identity in food and agriculture. Routledge. Cassidy, A., & McGrath, B. (2014). The Relationship between ‘Non‐successor’Farm Offspring and the Continuity of the Irish Family Farm. Sociologia Ruralis, 54(4), 399-416. Cavicchioli, D., Bertoni, D., Tesser, F., & Frisio, D. G. (2015). What factors encourage intrafamily farm succession in mountain areas? Mountain Research and Development, 35(2), 152-160. Cavicchioli, D., Bertoni, D., & Pretolani, R. (2018). Farm succession at a crossroads: The interaction among farm characteristics, labour market conditions, and gender and birth order effects. Journal of Rural Studies, 61, 73-83. Chiswell, H. M. (2014a). The importance of next generation farmers: A conceptual framework to bring the potential successor into focus. Geography Compass, 8(5), 300-312. Chiswell, H. M. (2014b). Rising to the food security challenge: an investigation into family farm succession in the South West of England. University of Exeter (United Kingdom). Chiswell, H. M. (2018). From generation to generation: changing dimensions of intergenerational farm transfer. Sociologia Ruralis, 58(1), 104-125. Clawson, M. (1963). Aging farmers and agricultural policy. Journal of Farm Economics, 45(1), 13-30. Contzen, S., & Forney, J. (2017). Family farming and gendered division of labour on the move: a typology of farming-family configurations. Agriculture and Human Values, 34, 27-40. Conway, S. F., McDonagh, J., Farrell, M., & Kinsella, A. (2016). Cease agricultural activity forever? Underestimating the importance of symbolic capital. Journal of Rural Studies, 44, 164-176. Conway, S. F., McDonagh, J., Farrell, M., & Kinsella, A. (2017). Uncovering obstacles: The exercise of symbolic power in the complex arena of intergenerational family farm transfer. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 60-75. Conway, S. F., McDonagh, J. O. H. N., Farrell, M., & Kinsella, A. (2018). Till death do us part: Exploring the Irish farmer-farm relationship in later life through the lens of ‘Insideness’. International Journal of Agricultural Management, 7 (1), 3-15. Conway, S. F., MacDonagh, J. O. H. N., Farrell, M., & Kinsella, A. (2019). Human dynamics and the intergenerational farm transfer process in later life: A roadmap for future generational renewal in agriculture policy. International Journal of Agricultural Management, 8(1), 22-30. Coopmans, I., Dessein, J., Accatino, F., Antonioli, F., Bertolozzi-Caredio, D., Gavrilescu, C., Gradziuk, P., Manevska-Tasevska, G., Meuwissen, M., Peneva, M., Petitt, A., Urquhartm, J., & Wauters, E. (2021). Understanding farm generational renewal and its influencing factors in Europe. Journal of Rural Studies, 86, 398-409. Dalkir, K. (2005). Knowledge management models. Knowledge management in theory and practice (pp. 47-74). Elsevier. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000a). The “what” and the “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000b). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020 Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (Eds.). (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press. Delphy, C. (1983). Agriculture et travail domestique: la réponse de la bergère à Engels. Nouvelles Questions Féministes Paris, 5, 3-17. DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage Publications. DeVellis, R. F., & Thorpe, C. T. (2021). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage Publications. Downey, H., Threlkeld, G., & Warburton, J. (2016). How do older Australian farming couples construct generativity across the life course? A narrative exploration. Journal of Aging Studies, 38, 57-69. Enticott, G., & Vanclay, F. (2011). The moral accountability of agricultural scripts: an analysis of farmers’ talk about animal health risks. Health Risk & Society, 13(4), 293-309. Errington, A. J., & Tranter, R. B. (1991). Getting out of farming? Part two: the farmers (No. 27, p. 151pp). Farm Management Unit, University of Reading. Errington, A. (2002). Handing over the reins: A comparative study of intergenerational farm transfers in England, France and Canada. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 5, 123-136. European Commission. (2008). Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Health Check. Brussels: European Union. FAO (2014). The state of food and agriculture 2014: innovation in family farming. Rome: FAO. Fielding, K. S., Terry, D. J., Masser, B. M., & Hogg, M. A. (2008). Integrating social identity theory and the theory of planned behaviour to explain decisions to engage in sustainable agricultural practices. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(1), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466607X206792 Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York: Psychology Press. Fischer, H., & Burton, R. J. F. (2014). Understanding farm succession as socially constructed endogenous cycles. Sociologia Ruralis, 54(4). Forney, J., & Sutherland, L. A. (2021). Identities on the family farm: agrarianism, materiality and the good farmer. In Handbook on the Human Impact of Agriculture (pp. 65-84). Edward Elgar Publishing. Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self‐determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational behavior, 26(4), 331-362. Garner, E., & de la O Campos, A. P. (2014). Identifying the “family farm”: An informal discussion of the concepts and definitions (ESA Working Paper No. 14-10). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Gasson, R., Crow, G., Errington, A., Hutson, J., Marsden, T., & Winter, D. M. (1988). The farm as a family business: a review. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 39(1), 1-41. Gasson, R., & Errington, A. (1993). The farm family business. CAB International. Goffman, E. (1990). The presentation of self in everyday life / Erving Goffman. Penguin. Gastwirth, J. L., Gel, Y. R., & Miao, W. (2009). The impact of Levene’s test of equality of variances on statistical theory and practice. Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 24(3), 343-360. doi: 10.1214/09-STS301 Government of Canada. (n.d.). Income Tax Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. 1 (5th Supp.), Section 70). Justice Laws Website. Graeub, B. E., Chappell, M. J., Wittman, H., Ledermann, S., Kerr, R. B., & Gemmill-Herren, B. (2016). The state of family farms in the world. World Development, 87, 1-15. Guilford, J. P. (1965). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education. Harl, N. E. (2015). Farm and ranch estate (and business) planning—Part 2. Estate Planning, 42(4), 21–30. Hastings, M. R. (1984). Succession on farms. Agricultural Manpower, 8(1), 4-8. Hayden, M. T., & Leonard, B. (2024). Concerns and barriers surrounding the farm succession process–perception versus reality for beef farmers in Ireland. Journal of Rural Studies, 112, 103456. Heather, B., Skillen, L., Young, J., & Vladicka, T. (2005). Women's gendered identities and the restructuring of rural Alberta. Sociologia Ruralis, 45(1‐2), 86-97. Heggem, R. (2014). Exclusion and inclusion of women in Norwegian agriculture: Exploring different outcomes of the ‘tractor gene’. Journal of Rural Studies, 34, 263-271. Holloway, L. A., Catney, G., Stockdale, A., & Nelson, R. (2021). Sustainable family farming futures: Exploring the challenges of family farm decision making through an emotional lens of ‘belonging’. Sustainability, 13(21), 12271. Holton, M., Riley, M., & Kallis, G. (2023). Keeping on [line] farming: Examining young farmers’ digital curation of identities, (dis)connection and strategies for self-care through social media. Geoforum, 142, 103749. Ilbery, B., & Bowler, I. (2014). From agricultural productivism to post-productivism. In The geography of rural change (pp. 57-84). Routledge. Jackson, P. W. (1968). Life in classrooms. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. Janke, A.W., Kawula, S. (1997). Polimor czność i komplementarność badań nad współczesną rodziną. In: Kawula, S., Brągiel, J., Janke, A.W. (Eds.), Pedagogika Rodziny. Obszary I Panorama Problematyki. Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek, Toruń. Jansuwan, P., & Zander, K. K. (2022). Multifunctional farming as successful pathway for the next generation of Thai farmers. PLoS ONE, 17(4), e0267351. Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., & Lundvall, B. Å. (2002). Why all this fuss about codified and tacit knowledge? Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(2), 245-262. Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and psychological measurement, 20(1), 141-151. Karahan, M., Abay, C., & Ito, R. (2023). Determining factors of retaining young farmers in agriculture: A case study in Turkey and Japan. AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 15(2), 41-54. Kelley, T. L. (1939). The selection of upper and lower groups for the validation of test items. Journal of Educational Psychology, 30(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057123 Kommey, R. E., & Fombad, M. C. (2024). Knowledge sharing technologies for rice farmers: A perspective from the Eastern Region of Ghana. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 16(2), 355–378. Krueger, D. E., & Riesenberg, L. E. (1991). Careers in agriculture as perceived by high school juniors and seniors. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual National Agricultural Education Research Meeting. Los Angeles, CA. Laband, D. N., & Lentz, B. F. (1983). Occupational inheritance in agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65(2), 311-314. Lidestav, G. (2010). In competition with a brother: Women’s inheritance positions in contemporary Swedish family forestry. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 25(S9), 14–24. Lin, J., Yu, C., & Lin, W. (2018). Intergenerational relationships, farm succession, and life satisfaction of return migration among rural youth. Innovation in Aging, 2(Suppl 1), 467-468. Liñán, F., & Chen, Y. W. (2009). Development and cross–cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 33(3), 593-617. Lobley, M., Errington, A., McGeorge, A., Millard, N., & Potter, C. (2002). Implications of changes in the structure of agricultural businesses. University of Plymouth, Seale-Hayne Campus, UK: Department of Land Use and Rural Management. Lobley, M. (2010). Succession in the family farm business. Journal of Farm Management, 13(12), 839-851. Lobley, M., Baker, J. R., & Whitehead, I. (2010). Farm succession and retirement: Some international comparisons. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 1(1), 49-64. Mann, S. (2007). Tracing the process of becoming a farm successor on Swiss family farms. Agriculture and Human Values, 24(4), 435-443. Melberg, K. (2005). Family farm transactions in Norway: Unpaid care across three farm generations. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 36(3), 419-441. Mishra, A. K., & El-Osta, H.S. (2008). Effect of agricultural policy on succession decisions of farm households. Review of Economics of the Household, 6(3), 285-307. Moore, R., Hall, P. K., Bachelor, E., & Moore, K. (2022, August). Strategies for treating heirs equitably. Ohio State University Agricultural & Resource Law Program. Morais, M., Binotto, E., & Borges, J. A. R. (2017). Identifying beliefs underlying successors’ intention to take over the farm. Land use policy, 68, 48-58. Morais, M., Borges, J. A. R., & Binotto, E. (2018). Using the reasoned action approach to understand Brazilian successors’ intention to take over the farm. Land use policy, 71, 445-452. Mowday, R.T., Porter, L.W. &Steers, R.M. (1982). Employee-Organization Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism and Turnover. Academic Press, New York. Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press, New York. Nunnally, J.C. (1978) Psychometric theory. 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. O’Brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41(5), 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6 Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Patchen, M. (1970). Participation, achievement and involvement on the job. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Pretice-Hall. Porter, L. W., Crampon, W. J., & Smith, F. J. (1976). Organizational commitment and managerial turnover: A longitudinal study. Organizational behavior and human performance, 15(1), 87-98. Price, L. (2010). ‘Doing it with men’: feminist research practice and patriarchal inheritance practices in Welsh family farming. Gender, place & culture, 17(1), 81-97. Price, L. (2012). The emergence of rural support organisations in the UK and Canada: Providing support for patrilineal family farming. Sociologia Ruralis, 52(3), 353-376. Price, L., & Conn, R. (2016). Keeping the name on the land: Patrilineal succession in Northern Irish family farming. In M. Lobley & J. Baker (Eds.), Keeping it in the family: International perspectives on succession and retirement on family farms (pp. 93-110). Ashgate Publishing Ltd. Riley, M. (2008). Experts in their fields: Farmer—expert knowledges and environmentally friendly farming practices. Environment and Planning A, 40(6), 1277-1293. Riley, M., & Robertson, B. (2022). The virtual good farmer: Farmers’ use of social media and the (re)presentation of “good farming”. Sociologia Ruralis, 62(3), 437-458. Rodriguez Lizano, V. A., Montero-Vega, M., & Sibelet, N. (2020). Which variables influence the succession process in family farms? A literature review. Rosenblatt, P.C. and Anderson, R.M. (1981). Interaction in farm families: tension and stress. In Coward, R.T. and Smith, W.M. (eds) The family in rural society. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 147-166. Rostowska, T. (1995). Pokolenia i międzypokoleniowość w rodzinie [Generations and intergenerationality in the family]. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne. Salamon, S. (1992). Prairie patrimony: Family, farming, and community in the Midwest. University of North Carolina Press. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding : an inquiry into human knowledge structures / Roger C. Schank, Robert P. Abelson. L. Erlbaum Associates. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (2013). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Psychology press. Silvasti, T. (2003a). Bending borders of gendered labour division on farms: the case of Finland. Sociologia ruralis, 43(2), 154-166. Silvasti, T. (2003b). The cultural model of “the good farmer” and the environmental question in Finland. Agriculture and human values, 20, 143-150. Spanevello, R. M., de Azevedo, L. F., Vargas, L. P., & Matte, A. (2011). A migração juvenil e implicações sucessórias na agricultura familiar. Revista de Ciências Humanas, 45(2), 291-304. Stets, J. E. and P. J. Burke. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly 63 (3): 224-237. Streiner, D. L. (2003). Starting at the Beginning: An Introduction to Coefficient Alpha and Internal Consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(1), 99–103. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18 Suess-Reyes, J., & Fuetsch, E. (2016). The future of family farming: A literature review on innovative, sustainable and succession-oriented strategies. Journal of Rural Studies, 47, 117-140. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Nelson-Hall. Tauer, L. W. (1985). Use of life insurance to fund the farm purchase from heirs. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 67(1), 60-69. Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International journal of medical education, 2, 53. Terry, D. J., Hogg, M. A., & White, K. M. (1999). The theory of planned behaviour: Self-identity, social identity and group norms. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38(3), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466699164149 Turner, J. C., & Tajfel, H. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Psychology of intergroup relations, 5, 7-24. Trentinaglia, M. T., Baldi, L., & Peri, M. (2023). Supporting agriculture in developing countries: new insights on the impact of official development assistance using a climate perspective. Agricultural and Food Economics, 11(1), 39. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Basil Blackwell. Uchiyama, T., Lobley, M., Errington, A., & Yanagimura, S. (2008). Dimensions of intergenerational farm business transfers in Canada, England, the USA and Japan. The Japanese Journal of Rural Economics, 10, 33-48. Vanclay, F., Silvasti, T., & Howden, P. (2007). Styles, parables and scripts: diversity and conformity in Australian and Finnish agriculture. Rural Society, 17(1), 3-8. Vanclay, F., & Enticott, G. (2011). The role and functioning of cultural scripts in farming and agriculture. Sociologia Ruralis, 51(3), 256-271. Wang, S. M., Yueh, H. P., & Wen, P. C. (2019). How the new type of entrepreneurship education complements the traditional one in developing entrepreneurial competencies and intention. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 2048. Ward, N., & Lowe, P. (1994). Shifting values in agriculture: the farm family and pollution regulation1. Journal of Rural Studies, 10(2), 173-184. Whatmore, S. (1991). Life cycle or patriarchy? Gender divisions in family farming. Journal of Rural Studies, 7(1-2), 71-76. Wierzbicka, A. (1994). Cultural scripts”: A semantic approach to cultural analysis and cross-cultural communication. Pragmatics and Language Learning, 5, 1-24. Wilson, G. A. (2001). From productivism to post‐productivism… and back again? Exploring the (un) changed natural and mental landscapes of European agriculture. Transactions of the institute of British Geographers, 26(1), 77-102. Wójcik, M., Jeziorska-Biel, P., & Czapiewski, K. (2019). Between words: A generational discussion about farming knowledge sources. Journal of Rural Studies, 67, 130-141. Yueh, H. P., Chen, T. L., & Cheng, P. J. (2014). Department identification, professional identification, and attitudes toward agriculture in agriculture college students. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23, 671-681. Yueh, H. P., Wu, Y. J., & Chen, W. F. (2020). The psychology and education of entrepreneurial development. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 27. 王人正、江昭皚（2019年 12月）。智慧農業技術介紹與應用實例。農業推廣手冊，74。 王玉珍、李宜玫、吳清麟（2019）。青少年優勢力量表之發展研究。教育心理學報，50(3)，503-528。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.201903_50(3).0006 王俊雄、陳姿伶、陳惠貞（2014）。日本新從農者之發展動向、面臨課題與施行對策。農業推廣文彙, 59, 147-168. 王淑美、岳修平、黃昱凱、康維真（2020）。科系認同對管理學院大學生創業意願的調節作用。教育科學研究期刊，65(4)，1-29。 王親仁（2004）。我國農村青年對農村發展願景與農業前途看法之研究。鄉村發展，6，1-24。 江川章（2012）。多様化する新規就農者の動向と就農支援の取組体制。農林金融, 65(11)，732-745. 行政院主計總處（2020）。109 年農林漁牧業普查報告。 行政院農業委員會（2017）。新農民培育計畫（106年至111年）核定本。行政院。https://www.afa.gov.tw/upload/afa/plan/file/202110121530270.pdf 行政院農業委員會（2020）。新進從農真安心政府甲您逗相挺。桃園區農情月刊，(253)，1-1(2)。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20131017004-202008-202009020018-202009020018-1-1(2) 行政院農業部（2025年3月）。農業就業人口。農業統計視覺化查詢網。https://statview.moa.gov.tw/aqsys_on/importantArgiGoal_lv3_1_6_2.html 吳明隆（2017）。SPSS統計應用實務：問卷分析與量化研究（第2版）。五南圖書。 吳明隆、涂金堂 (2005)。SPSS 與統計應用分析（第2 版）。臺北市：五南。 林清山 (1992)。心理與教育統計學。臺北市：東華。 吳嘉苓（2012）。訪談法。在瞿海源（主編），社會及行為科學研究法（二）：質性研究法（頁33-60）。臺北：東華。 李俊霆（2005）。因素數目決定法：特徵值大於一之再探〔碩士論文，國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2005.02044 李小璐（2016）。台灣護生道德敏感度量表之發展。﹝博士論文。國立陽明大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/c5b3ck。 邱皓政（2017）。多元迴歸的自變數比較與多元共線性之影響：效果量、優勢性與相對權數指標的估計與應用。臺大管理論叢，27(3)，65-108。https://doi.org/10.6226/NTUMR.2017.JAN.A103-022 岳修平、林維真（2000）。農校學生電腦素養與網路化農業資訊應用之研究。科學教育學刊，8(4)，317-333。 涂金堂（2012）。量表編製與SPSS（初版一刷）。五南。 許聖章、陳吉仲（2013）。以農業普查探討全球化下我國農業生產力。行政院主計總處委託研究報告（編號：RES-102-03）。臺北：行政院主計總處。 許聖章、徐雅媛（2021）。我國農業勞動力之運用分析。勞動及職業安全衛生研究季刊, 29(2), 132-150。 許淮哲（2024）。不同繼承型態在農地細碎過程中扮演的角色分析。［碩士論文。國立政治大學］臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 曾宇良、許溦倩（2020）。日本青年農民研修制度與新規就農支援政策之分析。農業推廣文彙，(印製中)，99-114。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20110114002-202012-202012210011-202012210011-99-114 陳向明（2002）。社會科學質的研究。臺北：五南。 陳秀卿（2001）。農村高齡者生活改善業務的現況及動向。農政與農情，106。 陳昱廷（2013）。《臺灣農家子弟從事農業工作意願之實證分析》。未出版碩士論文，國立臺灣大學。 陳寬裕、王正華（2021）。社會與行為科學統計學（第6版）。雙葉書廊。 陳炤堅（2018）。農企業創業意願之前置因素與其影響。﹝博士論文。國立臺灣大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/d7dfp2。 楊忠祥、楊啟文、林顯丞、陳鈺芳（2014）。Levene變異數相等檢定法F值、效果量與區間估計之計算－以獨立樣本t考驗為例。國北教大體育，(9)，94-100。https://doi.org/10.6659/NTUEPE.2014.9.94 劉仲冬（2008）。量與質社會研究的爭議及社會研究未來的走向及出路。胡幼慧（主編），質性研究理論：方法及本土女性研究實例（頁122-125）。臺北：巨流。 劉凱翔（2015）。歐盟農場結構之簡析。農政與農情，279。 鄭博仁、岳修平、陳姿伶（2011）。農學類科大一新生學系投入、生涯態度與科系認同感之初探研究。台灣農學會報, 12(6), 582-610. 藍佩嘉（2012）。質性個案研究法：紮根理論與延伸個案法。在楊國樞、瞿海源、畢恆達（編）。社會及行為科學研究法（二）：質性研究法（頁61-92）。臺北：東華。 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/99746 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究旨在探討影響農家子弟農場經營意願之關鍵因素，並建構一套結合理論與實務的解釋模型。臺灣農業長期以中小型家庭農場為經營主體，然面臨人口高齡化與青年斷層挑戰，家庭農場能否持續經營與順利傳承，成為農業永續發展的重要課題。農家子弟作為最具潛力的經營承接者，其是否願意投入農場經營，不僅受主觀態度影響，更與其對農業的認同、可感受到的環境支持，以及家族連結與身份認同息息相關。本研究整合計劃行為理論與社會認同理論，檢驗農場經營態度、環境支持對農場經營意願之影響，並納入農業認同與家庭農場認同作為調節變項。研究對象為具農家子弟身份背景者，並以大專院校學生與青年農民為主，採量化問卷調查法，回收有效樣本 317 份。資料分析包含描述性統計、因素與信度分析、t 檢定、多元線性迴歸與階層迴歸。
研究結果顯示，農場經營態度、制度支持與人際支持皆對農場經營意願具有顯著影響效果，農場經營態度的解釋力最為顯著。農業認同與家庭農場認同則展現顯著調節作用，分別強化支持資源對行為意願的正向效果。此外，交叉分析發現，農業工作經驗與家庭農場接管意願等背景條件，與大多數構面間皆呈現顯著且一致性差異，顯示其為區辨農業參與傾向的重要變項。本研究補足現行政策對青年農業行為意願與認同歷程的理解不足，並對未來農政設計提出實務建議，特別強調應同時關注心理動機、制度環境與家族文化的整合性介入，以提升農家子弟經營家庭農場的行動意願與接續穩定性。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study explores the key psychological and social factors influencing the willingness of farm successors in Taiwan to manage family farms. As Taiwan's agriculture is primarily composed of small to medium-sized family farms, aging farmers and the lack of young successors have raised concerns regarding sustainable farm operation and succession. Children from farming families, as potential successors, face complex interactions of personal attitudes, agricultural identity, perceived support, and emotional ties to the family farm. Integrating the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and Social Identity Theory (SIT), this study examines how farm management attitude and environmental support affect the intention to manage farms, with agricultural identity and family farm identification included as moderators. The research participants were individuals with family farming backgrounds, primarily consisting of university students and young farmers. Analytical methods included descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis, reliability analysis, t-tests, multiple linear regression, and hierarchical regression.
The results indicate that farm management attitude, institutional support, and interpersonal support all significantly influence the intention to manage farms, with farm attitude showing the strongest explanatory power. Agricultural identity and family farm identification demonstrated significant moderating effects, strengthening the positive impact of environmental support. Furthermore, subgroup analyses showed that respondents’ farm experience and succession intention are strongly associated with multiple key constructs, highlighting their distinguishing role in farm career decision-making. This study contributes to theoretical understanding and policy development by emphasizing the integrated roles of psychological motivation, institutional context, and familial identity in promoting sustainable family farm management among the younger generation. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-09-17T16:33:39Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-09-17T16:33:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目次
謝辭 I 摘要 II ABSTRACT III 目次 V 圖次 VII 表次 VIII 第一章、 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機 3 第三節 研究目的 4 第四節 研究問題 5 第五節 研究架構 6 第二章、 文獻探討 7 第一節 家庭農場的特徵與傳承挑戰 7 第二節 農家子弟的從農意願與影響因素 11 第三節 農場經營意願之理論架構建構基礎：計劃行為理論 15 第四節 農場經營意願之理論架構建構基礎：社會認同理論 18 第五節 影響農家子弟經營家庭農場意願之主要變項 22 第六節 小結與研究架構圖 25 第三章、 研究方法 31 第一節 研究設計與資料收集 31 第二節 研究工具與構面設計 33 第三節 問卷修正與信效度處理 35 第四節 資料分析方法 40 第四章、 研究結果與分析 41 第一節 研究樣本背景分析 41 第二節 主要變項描述性統計分析 46 第三節 樣本背景變項與主要構面之差異分析 54 第四節 相關分析 83 第五節 多元迴歸分析 86 第六節 調節效果階層迴歸分析 90 第七節 研究結果 135 第八節 研究討論 139 第五章、 結論與建議 143 第一節 研究結論 143 第二節 研究限制與未來研究方向 145 參考文獻 148 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 代間傳承 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 家庭農場 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 經營轉型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 代間關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 農業認同感 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Agricultural Identity | en |
| dc.subject | Intergenerational Relationships | en |
| dc.subject | Operational Transformation | en |
| dc.subject | Intergenerational Succession | en |
| dc.subject | Family Farm | en |
| dc.title | 農家子弟農場經營意願影響因素之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A Study on the Factors Influencing Young Farm Household Members’ Intention to Operate Family Farms | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蔡巧蓮;陳姿伶 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chiao-Lian Tsai;Tzy-Ling Chen | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 家庭農場,代間傳承,農業認同感,代間關係,經營轉型, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Family Farm,Intergenerational Succession,Agricultural Identity,Intergenerational Relationships,Operational Transformation, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 164 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202503451 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-08-07 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物產業傳播暨發展學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | N/A | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 生物產業傳播暨發展學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.96 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。