請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/99709完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張伯茹 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Po-Ju Chang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陶美吟 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Mei-Yin Tao | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-17T16:26:43Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-09-18 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-09-17 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-08-04 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 內政部國家公園署（2024年7月3日）。陽明山國家公園內攜帶寵物須繫繩鍊裝箱籠，違規可處新臺幣3000元以下罰鍰。下載網址：https://tinyurl.com/9mwu7ru7。
王小文、林晏州（1998）。大屯自然公園戶外遊憩者之遊憩衝突研究。戶外遊憩研究，11(1)，65-84。 王正平（2004）。登山健行遊客與登山自行車使用者遊憩衝突之研究。戶外遊憩研究，17(4)，71-91。 王正平（2015）。不同型態公園使用者對寵物狗接受度之研究。造園景觀學報，21(1)，55-71。 王正平（2018）。飼主對寵物狗管理規定接受度影響因素之研究－以大安森林公園為例。戶外遊憩研究，31(1)，51-82。 王正平、劉月瑩（2013）。陽明山國家公園遊客對寵物狗衝突知覺之研究。國家公園學報，23(3)，59-67。 市政白皮書（2025年3月14日）。113年下半年辦理情形與成果-辦理等級A案件。下載網址：https://tinyurl.com/6m5medve。 行政院農業委員會畜牧處動物保護科（2020）。動物福利白皮書（初版）。行政院農業委員會。 行政院農業部（2024年5月31日）。全國家犬貓飼養數量最新推估結果。下載網址：https://tinyurl.com/mfc9yrxz。 行政院農業部寵物登記管理資訊網（2025年7月7日）。寵物登記狀況。下載網址：https://tinyurl.com/2p9k3c62。 吳明隆（2009a）。SPSS 操作與應用：問卷統計分析實務。五南圖書出版份有限公司。 吳明隆（2009b）。結構方程模式：AMOS的操作與應用（二版）。五南圖書出版份有限公司。 李茂能（2006）。結構方程模式軟體Amos之簡介及其在測驗編製上之應用。心理出版社股份有限公司。 林俐吟、張軒瑄、高俊雄（2011）。陽明山登山自行車者的衝突敏感性、遊憩衝突與調適行為關係之研究。觀光休閒學報，17(3)，411-433。 邱皓政（2011）。結構方程模式：LISREL的理論、技術與應用（二版）。雙葉書廊出版社。 保育研究科（2022年2月8日）。民眾勿擅入為開放區域，攜帶寵物請確實繫鍊。下載網址：https://tinyurl.com/4nhsupww。 動物保護司（2024年5月31日）。全國家犬貓飼養數量最新推估結果。下載網址：https://tinyurl.com/mfc9yrxz。 國家發展委員會（2025年6月4日）。出生及死亡人數查詢系統。下載網址:https://tinyurl.com/yc3jb254。 張軒瑄、林俐吟（2013）。登山自行車者與登山健行者的衝突敏感性、遊憩衝突與調適行為關係之研究。國家公園學報，23(3)，68-84。 張偉豪（2011）。SEM論文寫作不求人。鼎茂總經銷。 張偉豪、鄭時宜（2012）。與結構方程模型共舞：曙光初現。前程企管出版社。 郭彰仁（2016）。比較中國大陸、歐美來台旅客之遊憩衝突與調適行為—以日月潭國家風景區為例。戶外遊憩研究，30(1)，27-61。 陽明山國家公園管理處（2022）。陽明山國家公園遊憩行為調查分析及遊憩管理檢討。下載網址：https://tinyurl.com/bde277tk。 黃芳銘（2007）。結構方程模式理論與應用（五版）。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。 新聞雲（2023年6月26日）。陽明山登山客遭家犬猛咬「小腿4、5個齒洞」飼主驚：牠很古意。下載網址：https://tinyurl.com/3tznh623。 臺北市政府法務局（2014年6月5日）。攜帶畜犬外出應妥善清理其排泄物，以免受罰。下載網址：https://tinyurl.com/2s3rarcr。 臺北市動物保護處（2017年1月3日）。陽明山遊蕩獒犬攻擊遊客，北市動保處與警察局搜山追緝。下載網址：https://tinyurl.com/5ybe6fdn。 劉月瑩、王正平（2014）。滿月圓國家森林遊樂區寵物狗遊憩衝突之研究。中華林學季刊，47(1)，63-77。 潘中道、胡龍騰、蘇文賢（2014）。研究方法：步驟化學習指南（二版更新版）。學富文化事業有限公司。 Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 Arnberger, A., & Eder, R. (2008). Assessing user interactions on shared recreational trails by long-term video monitoring. Managing Leisure, 13(1), 36-51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13606710701751385 Arvidsen, J., Kristensen, M. S., Klein-Wengel, T. T., Præstholm, S., Iversen, E. B., & Olafsson, A. S. (2024). Factors predicting recreational conflicts in urban forests. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 97, 128383.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128383 Bachinger, M., Hafner, M., & Harprecht, P. (2024). Cultural and space-based factors influencing recreational conflicts in forests. the example of cyclists and other forest visitors in Freiburg (Germany). European Journal of Cultural Management and Policy, 13, 12494. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/ejcmp.2023.12494 Beeco, J. A., & Brown, G. (2013). Integrating space, spatial tools, and spatial analysis into the human dimensions of parks and outdoor recreation. Applied Geography, 38, 76-85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.11.013 Bollen, K. A. (1990). Overall fit in covariance structure models: two types of sample size effects. 107, 256-259. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.25610.1037/0033-2909.107.2.256 Brown, G., & Donovan, S. (2014). Measuring change in place values for environmental and natural resource planning using public participation GIS (PPGIS): results and challenges for longitudinal research. Society & Natural Resources, 27(1), 36-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2013.840023 Bury, R. L., Holland, S. M., & McEwen, D. N. (1983). Analyzing recreational conflict: understanding why conflict occurs is requisite to managing that conflict. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 38(5), 401-403.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00224561.1983.12436333 Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming. (3rd ed.). Routledge.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315757421 Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555. Cronbach, L. J., & Shavelson, R. J. (2004). My current thoughts on coefficient alpha and successor procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(3), 391-418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164404266386 Deutsch, M. (1971). Toward an understanding of conflict. International Journal of Group Tensions. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526168795.00018 DeVillis, R. F. (1991). Scale development: theory and applications. In: Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Doll, W. J., Xia, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18(4), 453-461. https://doi.org/10.2307/249524 Ferguson, M., Giles, G., Ferguson, L., Barcelona, R., Evensen, D., Barrows, C., & Leberman, M. (2021). Seeing the forest for the trees: a social-ecological systems approach to managing outdoor recreation visitation in parks and protected areas. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 38, 100473.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2021.100473 Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, l. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Comoanv. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437810180010 Gaskin J., L. J. (2018). Multigroup analysis, amos plugin. Gaskination’s StatWiki. Gough, C., Weber, H., George, S., Maeder, A., & Lewis, L. (2021). Location monitoring of physical activity and participation in community dwelling older people: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil, 43(2), 270-283.https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1618928 Graefe, A. R., J., V. J., & and Kuss, F. R. (1984). Social carrying capacity: an integration and synthesis of twenty years of research. Leisure Sciences, 6(4), 395-431. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490408409513046 Iojă, C. I., Rozylowicz, L., Pătroescu, M., Niţă, M. R., & Vânau, G. O. (2011). Dog walkers’ vs. other park visitors’ perceptions: the importance of planning sustainable urban parks in Bucharest, Romania. Landscape and urban planning, 103(1), 74-82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.06.002 Jackson, E. L., & Wong, R. A. G. (1982). Perceived conflict between urban cross-country skiers and snowmobilers in Alberta. Journal of Leisure Research, 14(1), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1982.11969504 Jacob, G. R., & Schreyer, R. (1980). Conflict in outdoor recreation: a theoretical perspective. Journal of Leisure Research, 12(4), 368-380.https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1980.11969462 Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3th ed., pp. 192-193). Guilford. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, s. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping (Vol. 464). Springer. Lindsay, J. J. (1980). Trends in outdoor recreation activity conflicts. In: LaPage, Wilbur F., ed. Proceedings 1980 National Outdoor Recreation Trends Symposium. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-57. Vols. I and II. Broomall, PA: U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experimental Station: 215-221. Lucas, R. C. (1964). Wilderness perception and use: the example of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area. Natural Resources Journal, 3(3), 394-411.http://www.jstor.org/stable/24879759 Mann, C., & Absher, J. D. (2008). Recreation conflict potential and management implications in the northern/central Black Forest Nature Park. Journal of environmental planning and management, 51(3), 363-380.https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560801979527 Manning, R. E. (2011). Studies in outdoor recreation: search and research for satisfaction. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press. Manning, R. E., & Valliere, W. A. (2001). Coping in outdoor recreation: causes and consequences of crowding and conflict among community residents. Journal of Leisure Research, 33(4), 410-426.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2001.11949952 McCall, M. K., & Minang, P. A. (2005). Assessing participatory GIS for community‐based natural resource management: claiming community forests in Cameroon. Geographical Journal, 171(4), 340-356.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4959.2005.00173.x Miller, T. A., & McCool, S. F. (2003). Coping with stress in outdoor recreational settings: an application of transactional stress theory. Leisure Sciences, 25(2-3), 257-275. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400306562 Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Van Alstine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. 105, 430-445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.430 Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometrics Methods. N. Y.: McGraw─Hill Company. Owens, P. L. (1985). Conflict as a social interaction process in environment and behaviour research: the example of leisure and recreation research. Journal of Environmental psychology, 5(3), 243-259.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(85)80025-6 Porter, L. W., & Lawler, E. E. (1968). Managerial attitudes and performance. IL: Dorsey Press. Ramthun, R. (1995). Factors in user group conflict between hikers and mountain bikers. Leisure Sciences, 17(3), 159-169.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409509513254 Schneider, I. E., & Hammitt, W. E. (1995). Visitor response to outdoor recreation conflict: a conceptual approach. Leisure Sciences, 17(3), 223-234.https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409509513258 Schuster, R., Hammitt, W. E., & Moore, D. (2006). Stress appraisal and coping response to hassles experienced in outdoor recreation settings. Leisure Sciences, 28(2), 97-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400500483919 Sieber, R. (2006). Public participation geographic information systems: a literature review and framework. Annals of the association of American Geographers, 96(3), 491-507. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00702.x Stankey, G. H. (1973). Visitor perception of wilderness recreation carrying capacity. https://www.fs.usda.gov/rm/pubs_series/int/rp/int_rp142.pdf. Thapa, B., & Graefe, A. R. (2003). Level of skill and its relationship to recreation conflict and tolerance among adult skiers and snowboarders. World Leisure Journal, 45(1), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/04419057.2003.9674301 Thapa, B., & Graefe, A. R. (2004). Recreation conflict and tolerance among skiers and snowboarders. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 22(1), 37-52.https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400490432145 Ullman, J. B. (2001). Structural equation modeling. In: B. G. Tabachnick, & L. S. Fidell (4th ed., pp. 653-771). Vaske, J. J., Carothers, P., Donnelly, M. P., & Baird, B. (2000). Recreation conflict among skiers and snowboarders. Leisure Sciences, 22(4), 297-313. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409950202311 Vaske, J. J., & Donnelly, M. P. (2007). Perceived conflict with off leash dogs at Boulder Open Space and Mountain Parks. (H. D. i. N. R. U. P. C. w. O. L. (HDNRU Report No. 76). Report for Boulder Open Space and Mountain Parks. Fort Collins: Colorado State University, Ed.). Vaske, J. J., Donnelly, M. P., Wittmann, K., & Laidlaw, S. (1995). Interpersonal versus social‐values conflict. Leisure Sciences, 17(3), 205-222.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409509513257 Vaske, J. J., Needham, M. D., & Cline Jr, R. C. (2007). Clarifying interpersonal and social values conflict among recreationists. Journal of Leisure Research, 39(1), 182-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2007.11950103 Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. CA: Jossey-Bass. Watson, A. E. (1995). An analysis of recent progress in recreation conflict research and perceptions of future challenges and opportunities. Leisure Sciences, 17(3), 235-238. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409509513259 Westgarth, C., Christley, R. M., & Christian, H. E. (2014). How might we increase physical activity through dog walking?: a comprehensive review of dog walking correlates. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 11(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-11-83 Westgarth, C., Christley, R. M., Marvin, G., & Perkins, E. (2017). I walk my dog because it makes me happy: a qualitative study to understand why dogs motivate walking and improved health. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 14(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14080936 Weston, R., Gore Jr, P. A., Chan, F., & Catalano, D. (2008). An introduction to using structural equation models in rehabilitation psychology. Rehabilitation Psychology, 53(3), 340-356. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013039 Wolf, I. D., Brown, G., & Wohlfart, T. (2018). Applying public participation GIS (PPGIS) to inform and manage visitor conflict along multi-use trails. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26(3), 470-495.https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2017.1360315 Wolf, I. D., Wohlfart, T., Brown, G., & Lasa, A. B. (2015). The use of public participation GIS (PPGIS) for park visitor management: a case study of mountain biking. Tourism Management, 51, 112-130.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.05.003 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/99709 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 陽明山國家公園作為開放寵物狗入園的休閒場所，具有犬隻飼主與非飼主共享空間的特性。過去曾有新聞報導寵物狗騷擾或攻擊遊客的事件，引發對飼主責任、遊客安全與體驗品質的關注。然而，現有研究較少聚焦於飼主與非飼主對寵物狗干擾行為的衝突感受、應對行為以及調查行為發生地點的實際分佈。
本研究以陽明山國家公園為研究場域，從個人與環境兩方面探討寵物狗引發的遊憩衝突現象，並透過兩部份研究進行調查。研究一探討遊客遭遇寵物狗干擾行為的個人心理反應機制，以變項間的假設驗證進行分析；研究二探討遊客遭遇寵物狗干擾行為的實際應用，調查寵物狗干擾行為的發生地點，並提供管理單位建議。 研究一為網路問卷調查，針對衝突敏感性、遊憩衝突與調適行為間的關係進行結構方程模型分析，並區分飼主與非飼主進行比較。結果發現，飼主的衝突敏感性與遊憩衝突之間無顯著關係，但遊憩衝突會正向影響其調適行為；非飼主則呈現衝突敏感性正向影響遊憩衝突，且遊憩衝突正向影響其調適行為。此外，兩群體在衝突感受上的差異具非對稱性。研究二則透過現地問卷蒐集遊客實際經驗，調查寵物狗干擾行為的發生位置，以辨識衝突地點。結果顯示，干擾行為主要集中於步道交會處及熱門遊憩區域。 研究亦發現，遊客對管理改善的期待多集中於加強飼主責任、引導遊客行為及進行空間調整。值得注意的是，雖然調查結果顯示大多數干擾屬於社會價值衝突，遊客所偏好的管理方式卻較傾向於應對人際衝突的策略，如禁止規範與空間分隔。這反應出實務管理上，僅以衝突類型對應策略可能難以完全回應民眾需求。 綜合以上，本研究從個人與環境的角度作切入，完整呈現遊客對寵物狗干擾行為的衝突感知、調適行為與空間分佈，期望能作為陽明山國家公園在未來制定相關管理措施時的重要參考。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Yangmingshan National Park, as a recreational area that allows pet dogs, features shared spaces between dog guardians and non-guardians. Previous news reports have highlighted incidents of dogs harassing or attacking visitors, raising concerns about owner responsibility, visitor safety, and the quality of the recreational experience. However, existing research has rarely focused on the conflict perceptions, coping behaviors, and spatial distribution of pet-related disturbances from both dog guardians and non-guardians.
This study investigates pet-related recreational conflict in Yangmingshan National Park from both individual and environmental perspectives, using a two-part research design. Study 1 explores visitors’ psychological responses to pet-related disturbances through hypothesis testing among key variables. Study 2 examines the real-world occurrence of pet-related disturbances by identifying their spatial distribution and providing management recommendations. Study 1 utilized an online questionnaire to analyze the relationships among conflict sensitivity, perceived conflict, and coping behavior using structural equation modeling. Comparisons were made between dog guardians and non-guardians. Results showed that for dog guardians, conflict sensitivity was not significantly related to perceived conflict, though perceived conflict positively influenced coping behavior. In contrast, for non-guardians, conflict sensitivity positively affected perceived conflict, which in turn positively affected coping behavior. Notably, the two groups exhibited asymmetrical differences in perceived conflict. Study 2 conducted an on-site survey to collect visitors’ actual experiences and identify the locations of pet-related disturbances. Results indicated that disturbances were mainly concentrated at trail intersections and popular recreational areas. The study also found that visitors’ expectations for improved management focused on enhancing owner responsibility, guiding visitor behavior, and implementing spatial adjustments. Interestingly, while most reported conflicts were value-based, preferred management strategies leaned toward those typically used for interpersonal conflicts, such as regulation and spatial separation. This suggests that matching strategies strictly to conflict types may not fully meet public needs in practice. In sum, this study provides a comprehensive understanding of visitors’ perceptions of pet-related disturbances, coping behaviors, and spatial patterns. The findings aim to support Yangmingshan National Park in developing more effective management strategies. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-09-17T16:26:43Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-09-17T16:26:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝 i
摘要 ii Abstract iii 目次 iv 圖次 vi 表次 vii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機 1 第三節 研究目的 3 第二章 文獻回顧與探討 4 第一節 遊憩衝突的意涵 4 第二節 寵物狗干擾行為與遊憩衝突 9 第三節 緩解遊憩衝突的方法 12 第四節 遊憩衝突的模型發展與驗證 15 第五節 文獻回顧總結 23 第三章 研究方法 25 第一節 遊憩衝突的假設驗證 26 第二節 遊憩衝突的實際應用 30 第三節 研究設計 33 第四節 資料分析方法與流程 35 第四章 研究結果 37 第一節 遊憩衝突的假設驗證 37 第二節 遊憩衝突的實際應用 51 第五章 結果討論 65 第一節 比較兩部份研究的遊客特性 65 第二節 遊憩衝突的假設驗證 67 第三節 遊憩衝突的實際應用 71 第六章 結論與建議 73 第一節 研究結論 73 第二節 研究限制與建議 74 第三節 研究貢獻 75 參考文獻 76 附錄 82 附錄一、遊憩衝突假設驗證的問卷內容 82 附錄二、遊憩衝突實際應用的問卷內容 87 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 非飼主 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 飼主 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 公眾參與式地理資訊系統 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 結構方程模型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 寵物狗干擾行為 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | pet-related disturbances | en |
| dc.subject | structural equation modeling | en |
| dc.subject | public participation GIS | en |
| dc.subject | non-dog owners | en |
| dc.subject | dog owners | en |
| dc.title | 人犬遊憩衝突之使用者感知與空間分佈研究：以陽明山國家公園為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A Study on User Perceptions and Spatial Distribution of Human–Dog Recreation Conflicts: A Case Study of Yangmingshan National Park | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 凃宏明;林晏州;張俊彥 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Hung-Ming Tu;Yann-Jou Lin;Chun-Yen Chang | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 飼主,非飼主,寵物狗干擾行為,結構方程模型,公眾參與式地理資訊系統, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | dog owners,non-dog owners,pet-related disturbances,structural equation modeling,public participation GIS, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 88 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202503276 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-08-08 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝暨景觀學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2028-09-21 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 園藝暨景觀學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 4.04 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。