請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/99670完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 吳東諭 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Tung-Yu Wu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 柯朝鈞 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Chao-Chun Ko | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-17T16:19:33Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-09-18 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-09-17 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-07-24 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | [1] 林書豪 (2015),「大尺寸BCR鋼管柱之撓曲韌性」,國立臺灣科技大學營建工程系論文。
[2] 黃國倫,「冷沖壓成型(BCP)方鋼管柱撓曲耐震性能測試簡介」,民107年10月25號,中華民國內政部建築研所業務報告,取自https://www.abri.gov.tw/PeriodicalDetail.aspx?n=861&s=2126&key=81&isShowAll=false [3] ANIS/AISC 341-22 (2022). Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, An American National Standard. [4] 中華民國內政部國土管理署 (2010),「鋼結構極限設計法規及規範解說」。 [5] 国土交通省: 建築物の構造関係技術基準解説書. 2020. [6] Nakajima Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. 民114年4月19號,取自https://nakajima-sp.com/products/ [7] 陳正平 (2019),「結構用鋼規格及桿件接頭設計要點」,社團法人臺灣省土木技師公會技師報,NO.1187。 [8] Fogarty, J., & El-Tawil, S. (2016). “Collapse Resistance of Steel Columns under Combined Axial and Lateral Loading.” Journal of Structural Engineering, 142(1), 04015091. [9] Wu, T.-Y., El-Tawil, S., & McCormick, J. (2018). Highly ductile limits for deep steel columns. Journal of Structural Engineering, 144(4), 04018016. [10] Chou, C.-C., & Chen, G.-W. (2020). “Lateral cyclic testing and backbone curve development of high-strength steel built-up box columns under axial compression.” Engineering Structures, 223, 111147. [11] Lin, T.-H., & Chou, C.-C. (2022). High-strength steel deep H-shaped and box columns under proposed near-fault and post-earthquake loadings.” Thin-Walled Structures, 172, 108892. [12] Suzuki, Y., & D. G. Lignos. (2017). “Collapse behavior of steel columns as part of steel frame buildings: Experiments and numerical models.” In proc., 16th World Conference on Earthquake. Santiago, Chile: International Association of Earthquake Engineering. [13] Sediek, O. A., Wu, T.-Y., McCormick, J., & El-Tawil, S. (2020). “Collapse behavior of hollow structural section columns under combined axial and lateral loading. Journal of Structural Engineering, 146(6), 04020094. [14] 向出静司, 奥伸之, 松尾克也, & 多田元英. (2016). 製造方法が異なる箱形断面柱の大変形域載荷実験. 鋼構造論文集, 23(90), 90_51-90_64. [15] 翁健庭 (2023),「初始缺陷對中空鋼管柱耐震行為之影響」,國立臺灣大學土木工程系碩士論文。 [16] 吳紫瑩 (2018),「冷作對BCP柱耐震性能之影響」,國立臺灣科技大學營建工程學系碩士論文。 [17] 張雨晶 (2020),「銲接對BCP柱與高強度箱型柱之韌性發展影響」,國立臺灣科技大學營建工程學系碩士論文 [18] Ozkula, G., Uang, C.-M., & Harris, J. (2021). “Development of enhanced seismic compactness requirements for webs in wide-flange steel columns.” Journal of Structural Engineering, 147(7), 04021100. [19] 鄧宇雯 (2024),「方形中空鋼管柱之耐震行為與寬厚比要求」,國立臺灣大學土木工程系碩士論文。 [20] 財團法人國家實驗研究院國家地震工程中心,「多軸向試驗系統」,民114年3月28號,取自:https://www.ncree.narl.org.tw/about/laboratory/page/05 [21] 中華民國經濟部標準鑑驗局 (2005),「CNS 2112 金屬材料拉伸試驗片」。 [22] JFE Steek Corporation. “JFE Column Catalog” available at https://www.jfe-steel.co.jp/en [23] Huang, Y. (2009). “Simulating the inelastic seismic behavior of steel braced frames including the effects of low-cycle fatigue.” University of California, Berkeley. [24] Arasaratnam, P., Sivakumaran, K. S., & Tait, M. J. (2011). “True stress‐true strain models for structural steel elements.” International Scholarly Research Notices, 2011(1), 656401. [25] Okazaki, T., Lignos, D. G., Hikino, T., & Kajiwara, K. (2013). Dynamic response of a chevron concentrically braced frame. Journal of structural engineering, 139(4), 515-525. [26] de Castro e Sousa, A., Suzuki, Y., & Lignos, D. (2020). Consistency in solving the inverse problem of the Voce-Chaboche constitutive model for plastic straining. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 146(9), 04020097. [27] Cui, Y., Luo, Y., & Nakashima, M. (2013). Development of steel beam-to-column connections using SFRCC slabs. Engineering structures, 52, 545-557. [28] Wang, Y., Arakida, R., Chan, I., Koetaka, Y., & Nakano, T. (2018). Cyclic behavior of panel zone in beam-column subassemblies subjected to bidirectional loading. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 143, 32-45. [29] Wang, Y., Koetaka, Y., Chan, I., & Nakano, T. (2020). Elasto-plastic behavior of weak-panel beam-column joints with RC slabs under bidirectional loading. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 168, 105880. [30] Mou, B., Liu, Y., Wei, P., Zhao, F., Chenglong, W., & Ning, N. (2021). Numerical investigation and design method of bolted beam-column joint panel with eccentricity in beam depths. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 180, 106568. [31] Nie, R., Li, Y., Bai, Y., Mou, B., & Zhou, Y. (2022). HSS steel corner column to H-beam joints under cyclic bidirectional loadings: Experiment, numerical modeling, and calculation. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 192, 107239. [32] Mou, B., Liu, X., Wang, F., & Xiao, H. (2022). Cyclic testing on prefabricated joints for steel beam to concrete-filled steel tubular column. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 194, 107345. [33] Mou, B., Li, X., Qiao, Q., He, B., & Wu, M. (2019). Seismic behaviour of the corner joints of a frame under biaxial cyclic loading. Engineering structures, 196, 109316. [34] Mou, B., Li, Y., & Qiao, Q. (2021). Connection behavior of CFST column-to-beam joint implanted by steel rebars under cyclic loading. Engineering Structures, 246, 113036. [35] Xiang, P., Qing, Z., Jia, L. J., Wu, M., & Xie, J. (2020). Damage evaluation and ultra-low-cycle fatigue analysis of high-rise steel frame with mesoscopic fracture models. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 139, 106283. [36] Yamada, S., & Ishida, T. (2022). Collapse behavior of weak column type steel moment resisting frames built with square hollow section columns subjected to bi-directional horizontal ground motion. Journal of Building Engineering, 48, 103960. [37] Mou, B., Li, X., Bai, Y., & Wang, L. (2019). Shear behavior of panel zones in steel beam-to-column connections with unequal depth of outer annular stiffener. Journal of Structural Engineering, 145(2), 04018247. [38] 服部和徳‧見波 進‧中込忠男‧西山 功: 25度狭開先を適用した冷間成形角形鋼管―通しダイアフラム接合部の3点曲げ実験, 日本建築学会構造系論文集, 80(718), 1991-1999, 2015.12 [39] Masuda, H., & Tanaka, A. (2000). Statical characteristics of the improved rigid beam-to-column connections of steel structure. In Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (Auckland, New Zealand). New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering. [40] Mou, B., Zhao, F., & Liu, X. (2022). Flexure behavior of composite beam to CFST column connection: Numerical investigation and theoretical design formulae. Journal of Building Engineering, 51, 104210. [41] Nakashima, M., Matsumiya, T., Suita, K., & Liu, D. (2006). Test on full‐scale three‐storey steel moment frame and assessment of ability of numerical simulation to trace cyclic inelastic behaviour. Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, 35(1), 3-19. [42] Skalomenos, K., Kurata, M., & Ikeda, Y. (2020). “Hybrid collapse test of steel columns with nonlinear frame substructuring and force redistribution.” EURODYN 2020 - XI International Conference on Structural Dynamics, 3291-3300. [43] Suzuki, Y. (2018). “Earthquake-induced collapse of steel moment resisting frames with conventional and high-performance steel columns.” Doctoral dissertation, McGill University. [44] Minami, S., Hattori, K., & Nakagomi, T. (2017). “Seismic performance of cold-formed square-HSS steel columns to through-diaphragm welding connection using a 25° narrow groove.” 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (16WCEE), Santiago, Chile. [45] 吳易宸 (2011),「火害下內灌混凝土箱型鋼柱之軸向受力行為」,國立陽明交通大學土木工程學系碩士論文。 [46] 李鎮宏 (2010),「鋼結構耐震韌性梁柱接頭之耐火性能研究」,內政部建築研究所自行研究報告。 [47] 前田泰史‧鈴木庸介‧岸野泰章‧黄 一 華‧大島 豊‧岩田 衛‧和田 章: ダンパー付き鋼構造骨組における梁端フランジ溶接部の力学的特性, 日本建築学会構造系論文集, 529, 159-166, 2000.3 [48] 岸木祥一‧佐藤亮太‧山田 哲‧長谷川隆: 鋼種が異なる梁端接合部の繰り返し変形性能の評価法, 日本建築学会構造系論文集, 81(723), 917-927, 2016.5 [49] 安藤秀平‧平島岳夫: 火災時における高力ボルト摩擦接合継手の最大引張耐, 日本建築学会構造系論文集, 80(712), 961-970, 2015.6 [50] 穂積秀雄‧牧村義隆‧平野道隆: 冷間プレス成形角形鋼管角部の応カーひずみ曲線, 日本建築学会構造系論文集, 481, 107-116, 1996.3 [51] 秋山 宏‧桑村 仁‧浅川達也‧萩原行人: 冷間プレス成形角形鋼管溶接接合部の破壊特性. 日本建築学会構造系論文集, 471, 163-171, 1995.5 [52] 水崎祐一‧中込忠男‧藤田哲也: 角形鋼管の終局挙動に及ぼす製造工程の影響. 日本建築学会大会学術講演梗概集, 21549, 1992.8 [53] 秋山 宏‧桑村 仁‧山田 哲‧邱 榮政‧菊川春三: 冷間成形角形鋼管・圧延H形鋼の力学的性能に関する実験, 日本建築学会構造工学論文論文集, Vol.38B. 1992.3 [54] Chansuk, P., Ozkula, G., & Uang, C. M. (2020). “Application of Timoshenko Beam-Column Theory in Data Correction for Steel Beam-Column Testing.” Journal of Structural Engineering, 146(3), 04019230. [55] ANIS/AISC Committee (2025). Seismic Local Buckling Limits. Task Group Report by Committee on Specifications. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/99670 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 中空鋼管柱斷面(HSS)是一種經冷加工處理製成之結構用柱,其特殊的製造過程使其相較於傳統的I型柱與箱型柱(BOX)在生產成本與碳排放上更具優勢,是結構用柱的理想選擇。
寬厚比是影響鋼管柱產生局部挫屈的重要參數,透過限制寬厚比可確保鋼柱的耐震性能。然而我國、美國與日本對HSS的寬厚比之限制存在顯著差異,且目前針對矩形HSS柱耐震行為之相關研究尚不充分。 本研究設計五支矩形HSS試體,進行承受軸力並施加反覆側向位移之試驗,旨在探討銲道位置、翼板寬厚比b/t以及軸力比P/P_ya對於HSS耐震性能之影響,並以極限層間位移角〖SDA〗_cr作為性能參數。試驗結果顯示,銲道位置對〖SDA〗_cr影響並不顯著,b/t與P/P_ya對〖SDA〗_cr呈現負相關。 隨後本研究選用廣泛應用於日本工程實務之兩種HSS斷面(BCR295與BCP325)利用有限元素軟體進行參數分析,同時針對矩形試體進行模擬驗證,以確認模型能夠反映矩形HSS受軸力與反覆位移作用下之力學行為。此外,為確保HSS矩形柱在受弱軸方向地震力時仍具良好的耐震性能,本研究參數分析除對強軸方向進行反覆位移,亦進行弱軸方向之反覆位移之參數分析。參數分析結果顯示,在強軸方向下,除b/t與P/P_ya對〖SDA〗_cr有影響外,高深比L/H、斷面寬深比B/H以及材料降伏比YR對〖SDA〗_cr也有一定的影響;而在弱軸方向下,腹板寬厚比h/t、P/P_ya、L/B與YR對〖SDA〗_cr有影響。 參照b/t、L/H等幾何參數範圍,本研究建立強軸與弱軸之數據庫,並根據參數分析結果,針對強、弱軸數據庫將對應之重要參數加入迴歸式中,以確保迴歸式能夠有效預測〖SDA〗_cr。最終,本研究依據B/H不同,使用不同迴歸式以評估矩形HSS柱之耐震性能。 透過迴歸分析結果可提出HSS之耐震寬厚比建議限制式,並與我國、美國及日本之現行規範做比較,結果顯示,我國與美國規範在低軸力下較為保守、高軸力下則較為寬鬆,日本規範整體則過於寬鬆。結果可做為未來耐震設計規範之參考依據。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Hollow Structural Section (HSS) columns are steel members manufactured through cold-forming, offering advantages over I-shaped and built-up box columns in terms of production cost and carbon emissions, making them well-suited for structural applications. However, significant differences exist in the specified width-to-thickness ratio requirements for HSS among Taiwan, the United States, and Japan, while current research on the seismic behavior of rectangular HSS columns remains insufficient.
Five rectangular HSS specimens were designed and tested under axial load and cyclic lateral displacement to investigate the effects of weld seam location, flange width-to-thickness ratio b/t, and axial force ratio P/P_ya on seismic performance. The critical story drift angle 〖SDA〗_cr was adopted as the performance parameter. Test results indicate that the location of the weld seam had minimal influence on 〖SDA〗_cr, while both b/t and P/P_ya exhibited a negative correlation with it. Finite element models were subsequently developed and validated against experimental results. Parametric studies were then conducted on two widely used HSS sections in Japanese practice (BCR295 and BCP325). To evaluate seismic performance under different loading directions, cyclic displacements were applied along both strong and weak axes. The results indicate that, the SDA_cr was influenced by b/t, P/P_ya, span-to-depth ratio L/H, section aspect ratio B/H and yielding ratio YR. In contrast, for the weak-axis direction, SDA_cr was primarily affected by h/t, P/P_ya, L/B and YR. Based on the range of b/t and L/H, separate databases for strong-axis and weak-axis loading were established in this study. To ensure that the regression models can accurately predict the SDA_cr, the parameters identified as influential to SDA_cr were incorporated into the regression equations. Depending on the value of B/H, different regression models can then be applied to evaluate the seismic performance of rectangular HSS columns. Finally, seismic width-to-thickness ratio requirements for HSS columns are proposed based on the regression results and compared with the current code in Taiwan, the United States, and Japan to assess their adequacy and support future design guidelines. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-09-17T16:19:33Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-09-17T16:19:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
摘要 ii ABSTRACT iii 目 次 iv 圖 次 vi 表 次 xi 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景與動機 1 1.2 研究方法 1 1.3 論文結構 2 第二章 文獻回顧 4 2.1 HSS鋼管柱簡介 4 2.2 中空鋼管柱寬厚比限制 4 2.3 鋼柱重要參數之發展歷程 6 2.4 小結 11 第三章 矩形鋼管柱結構實驗 19 3.1 矩形鋼管柱試體設計 19 3.2 實驗配置 19 3.2.1 多軸向試驗控制系統 19 3.2.2 量測儀器 20 3.2.3 側向載重加載歷時 20 3.3 結果與討論 20 3.3.1 材料拉伸試驗 20 3.3.2 試體破壞進程行為 21 3.3.3 遲滯行為 24 3.3.4 局部挫屈行為 25 3.3.5 位移容量 25 3.3.6 與現行規範比較 27 第四章 中空鋼管柱數值模擬 52 4.1 有限元素軟體介紹 52 4.2 有限元素模型建置 52 4.2.1 材料模型 52 4.2.2 元素型式、邊界條件及載重 54 4.2.3 模擬方法驗證 54 4.3 參數分析結果與討論 55 4.3.1 尺寸效應影響 55 4.3.2 寬深比(B/H)影響 56 4.3.3 BCR與BCP行為差異 56 4.3.4 矩形弱軸行為 57 第五章 建議寬厚比限制式 81 5.1 非線性迴歸分析 81 5.1.1 迴歸分析之數據庫 81 5.1.2 迴歸分析結果 82 5.2 有效層間位移角 85 5.2.1 邊界條件修正係數γb 85 5.2.2 位移歷時修正係數γl 86 5.2.3 軸力形式修正係數γa 86 5.2.4 參數分析 86 5.3 建議式與規範比較 87 5.3.1 B/H≤1之建議式 87 5.3.2 B/H>1之建議式 88 5.3.3 建議式與現行規範比較結果 89 5.3.4 建議式與AISC341-27比較結果 90 第六章 結論與建議 114 6.1 結論 114 6.2 建議 115 參考文獻 116 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 反覆載重實驗 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 中空鋼管柱 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 寬厚比限制 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 非線性迴歸分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 有限元素模擬 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Finite Element Modeling | en |
| dc.subject | Nonlinear Regression Analysis | en |
| dc.subject | Width-to-Thickness Ratio Requirements | en |
| dc.subject | Cyclic Loading Test | en |
| dc.subject | Hollow Structural Section | en |
| dc.title | 矩形中空鋼管柱之耐震性能與寬厚比限制 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Experimental and Numerical Investigation on Compactness of Rectangular Hollow Section Columns | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 周中哲;蕭博謙 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chung-Che Chou;Po-Chien Hsiao | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 中空鋼管柱,反覆載重實驗,有限元素模擬,非線性迴歸分析,寬厚比限制, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Hollow Structural Section,Cyclic Loading Test,Finite Element Modeling,Nonlinear Regression Analysis,Width-to-Thickness Ratio Requirements, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 119 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202502321 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-07-25 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2030-07-23 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 12.08 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
