Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 商學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/99496
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor陳忠仁zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorChung-Jen Chenen
dc.contributor.author邱柏楷zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorBo-Kai Chowen
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-10T16:28:03Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-11-
dc.date.copyright2025-09-10-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.date.submitted2025-07-02-
dc.identifier.citationAdler, P. S. & Kwon, S.-W. 2002. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1): 17-40.
Agrawal, A., Knoeber, C. R., & Tsoulouhas, T. 2006. Are outsiders handicapped in CEO successions? Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(3): 619-644.
Aldrich, R., Getting, P., & Thompson, S. 1979. Mechanism of frequency‐dependent broadening of molluscan neurone soma spikes. The Journal of Physiology, 291(1): 531-544.
Amore, M. D., Bennedsen, M., Le Breton‐Miller, I., & Miller, D. 2021. Back to the future: The effect of returning family successions on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 42(8): 1432-1458.
Ansari, I. F., Goergen, M., & Mira, S. 2014. The determinants of the CEO successor choice in family firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 28: 6-25.
Arena, C., Michelon, G., & Trojanowski, G. 2018. Big Egos Can Be Green: A Study of CEO Hubris and Environmental Innovation. British Journal of Management, 29(2): 316-336.
Asante-Appiah, B., Kim, J. B., & Koo, K. 2024. CEO outside Board Service and Managerial Short-Termism. Accounting Horizons: 1-24.
Baghdadi, G. A., Bhatti, I. M., Nguyen, L. H. G., & Podolski, E. J. 2018. Skill or effort? Institutional ownership and managerial efficiency. Journal of Banking & Finance, 91: 19-33.
Bailey, E. E. & Helfat, C. E. 2003. External management succession, human capital, and firm performance: An integrative analysis. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24(4): 347-369.
Balsmeier, B. & Buchwald, A. 2015. Who promotes more innovations? Inside versus outside hired CEOs. Industrial and Corporate Change, 24(5): 1013-1045.
Barron, J. M., Chulkov, D. V., & Waddell, G. R. 2011. Top management team turnover, CEO succession type, and strategic change. Journal of Business Research, 64(8): 904-910.
Baysinger, B. D., Kosnik, R. D., & Turk, T. A. 1991. Effects of board and ownership structure on corporate R&D strategy. Academy of Management journal, 34(1): 205-214.
Beal, R. M. & Yasai-Ardekani, M. 2000. Performance implications of aligning CEO functional experiences with competitive strategies. Journal of Management, 26(4): 733-762.
Berns, K. V. & Klarner, P. 2017. A review of the CEO succession literature and a future research program. Academy of Management Perspectives, 31(2): 83-108.
Biggs, E. L. 2004. CEO succession planning: An emerging challenge for boards of directors. Academy of Management Perspectives, 18(1): 105-107.
Bigley, G. A. & Wiersema, M. F. 2002. New CEOs and corporate strategic refocusing: How experience as heir apparent influences the use of power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4): 707-727.
Boeker, W. 1992. Power and managerial dismissal: Scapegoating at the top. Administrative Science Quarterly: 400-421.
Boeker, W. & Goodstein, J. 1993. Performance and successor choice: The moderating effects of governance and ownership. Academy of Management journal, 36(1): 172-186.
Boeker, W. 1997. Strategic change: The influence of managerial characteristics and organizational growth. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1): 152-170.
Boulding, W. & Staelin, R. 1995. Identifying generalizable effects of strategic actions on firm performance: the case of demand-side returns to R&D spending. Marketing Science, 14(3): G222-G236.
Bourgeois, L. J. 1981. On the measurement of organizational slack. Academy of Management review, 6(1): 29-39.
Brickley, J. A., Lease, R. C., & Smith, C. W. 1988. Ownership structure and voting on antitakeover amendments. Journal of financial economics, 20: 267-291.
Bromiley, P. 1991. Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance. Academy of Management journal, 34(1): 37-59.
Campbell, T. C., Gallmeyer, M., Johnson, S. A., Rutherford, J., & Stanley, B. W. 2011. CEO optimism and forced turnover. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(3): 695-712.
Campopiano, G., Calabrò, A., & Basco, R. 2020. The “most wanted”: The role of family strategic resources and family involvement in CEO succession intention. Family Business Review, 33(3): 284-309.
Cannella, A. A. & Lubatkin, M. 1993. Succession as a sociopolitical process: Internal impediments to outsider selection. Academy of management journal, 36(4): 763-793.
Cao, Q., Maruping, L. M., & Takeuchi, R. 2006. Disentangling the effects of CEO turnover and succession on organizational capabilities: A social network perspective. Organization Science, 17(5): 563-576.
Carlson, R. O. 1961. Succession and performance among school superintendents. Administrative Science Quarterly: 210-227.
Carpenter, M. A. & Fredrickson, J. W. 2001. Top management teams, global strategic posture, and the moderating role of uncertainty. Academy of Management journal, 44(3): 533-545.
Chaganti, R. & Damanpour, F. 1991. Institutional ownership, capital structure, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 12(7): 479-491.
Chahine, S., Fang, Y., Hasan, I., & Mazboudi, M. 2019. Entrenchment through corporate social responsibility: Evidence from CEO network centrality. International Review of Financial Analysis, 66: 101347.
Chen, C.-J., Song, Y.-X., & Chow, B.-K. 2025. Outside vs. inside succession: Environmental and organizational contexts, strategic decision, and firm performance. Long Range Planning, 58(1): 102485.
Chen, G. & Hambrick, D. C. 2011. CEO Replacement in Turnaround Situations: Executive (Mis)Fit and Its Performance Implications. Organization Science, 23(1).
Chen, G. & Hambrick, D. C. 2012. CEO replacement in turnaround situations: Executive (mis) fit and its performance implications. Organization Science, 23(1): 225-243.
Chen, G., Luo, S., Tang, Y., & Tong, J. Y. 2015. Passing probation: Earnings management by interim CEOs and its effect on their promotion prospects. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5): 1389-1418.
Chen, H.-R. & Huang, H.-L. 2010. User acceptance of mobile knowledge management learning system: Design and analysis. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(3): 70-77.
Chrisman, J. J. & Patel, P. C. 2012. Variations in R&D investments of family and nonfamily firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Academy of management Journal, 55(4): 976-997.
Chung, C. N. & Luo, X. R. 2013. Leadership succession and firm performance in an emerging economy: Successor origin, relational embeddedness, and legitimacy. Strategic Management Journal, 34(3): 338-357.
Chung, K. H., Rogers, R. C., Lubatkin, M., & Owers, J. E. 1987. Do insiders make better CEOs than outsiders? Academy of Management Perspectives, 1(4): 325-331.
Chung, K. H. & Pruitt, S. W. 1994. A simple approximation of Tobin's q. Financial Management: 70-74.
Connelly, B. L., Hoskisson, R. E., Tihanyi, L., & Certo, S. T. 2010. Ownership as a form of corporate governance. Journal of management studies, 47(8): 1561-1589.
Connelly, B. L., Ketchen, D. J., Gangloff, K. A., & Shook, C. L. 2016. Investor perceptions of CEO successor selection in the wake of integrity and competence failures: A policy capturing study. Strategic Management Journal, 37(10): 2135-2151.
Cragun, O. R., Nyberg, A. J., & Wright, P. M. 2016. CEO succession: what we know and where to go? Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 3(3): 222-264.
Crossland, C., Zyung, J., Hiller, N. J., & Hambrick, D. C. 2014. CEO career variety: Effects on firm-level strategic and social novelty. Academy of Management Journal, 57(3): 652-674.
Cummings, T. & Knott, A. M. 2018. Outside CEOs and innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8): 2095-2119.
Cvijanović, D., Gantchev, N., & Li, R. 2023. CEO succession roulette. Management Science, 69(10): 5794-5815.
Cyert, R. & March, J. 2015. Behavioral theory of the firm, Organizational Behavior: 60-77: Routledge.
Dalton, D. R. & Kesner, I. F. 1985. Organizational performance as an antecedent of inside/outside chief executive succession: An empirical assessment. Academy of Management Journal, 28(4): 749-762.
Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Certo, S. T., & Roengpitya, R. 2003. Meta-analyses of financial performance and equity: fusion or confusion? Academy of Management Journal, 46(1): 13-26.
Datta, D. K. & Guthrie, J. P. 1994. Executive succession: Organizational antecedents of CEO characteristics. Strategic Management Journal, 15(7): 569-577.
David, P. & Kochhar, R. 1996. Barriers to effective corporate governance by institutional investors: Implications for theory and practice. European Management Journal, 14(5): 457-466.
DeAngelo, H. & DeAngelo, L. 1985. Managerial ownership of voting rights: A study of public corporations with dual classes of common stock. Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1): 33-69.
DeFond, M. L. & Park, C. W. 1999. The effect of competition on CEO turnover. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 27(1): 35-56.
Denis, D. J., Denis, D. K., & Sarin, A. 1997. Ownership structure and top executive turnover. Journal of Financial Economics, 45(2): 193-221.
Dess, G. G. & Beard, D. W. 1984. Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly: 52-73.
Dierickx, I. & Cool, K. 1989. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35(12): 1504-1511.
Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1): 57-74.
Essman, S. M., Schepker, D. J., Nyberg, A. J., & Ray, C. 2021. Signaling a successor? A theoretical and empirical analysis of the executive compensation‐chief executive officer succession relationship. Strategic Management Journal, 42(1): 185-201.
Farida, I. & Setiawan, D. 2022. Business strategies and competitive advantage: the role of performance and innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(3): 163.
Friedman, S. D. & Singh, H. 1989. CEO succession and stockholder reaction: The influence of organizational context and event content. Academy of Management Journal, 32(4): 718-744.
Friedman, S. D. & Saul, K. 1991. A leader's wake: Organization member reactions to CEO succession. Journal of Management, 17(3): 619-642.
Gavetti, G. 2012. PERSPECTIVE—Toward a behavioral theory of strategy. Organization Science, 23(1): 267-285.
Georgakakis, D. & Ruigrok, W. 2017. CEO succession origin and firm performance: A multilevel study. Journal of Management Studies, 54(1).
Govindarajan, V. 1989. Implementing competitive strategies at the business unit level: Implications of matching managers to strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 10(3): 251-269.
Graffin, S. D., Boivie, S., & Carpenter, M. A. 2013. Examining CEO succession and the role of heuristics in early‐stage CEO evaluation. Strategic Management Journal, 34(4): 383-403.
Gral, B. 2013. How financial slack affects corporate performance: an examination in an uncertain and resource scarce environment: Springer Science & Business Media.
Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3): 481-510.
Haleblian, J., McNamara, G., Kolev, K., & Dykes, B. J. 2012. Exploring firm characteristics that differentiate leaders from followers in industry merger waves: A competitive dynamics perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9): 1037-1052.
Hambrick, D. C. 1983. High profit strategies in mature capital goods industries: A contingency approach. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4): 687-707.
Hambrick, D. C. & Mason, P. A. 1984. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2): 193-206.
Hambrick, D. C. & Finkelstein, S. 1987. Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. Research in Organizational Behavior.
Hambrick, D. C. & D'Aveni, R. A. 1988. Large corporate failures as downward spirals. Administrative Science Quarterly: 1-23.
Hambrick, D. C. & Quigley, T. J. 2014. Toward more accurate contextualization of the CEO effect on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(4): 473-491.
Hansmann, H. 1988. Ownership of the Firm. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 4(2): 267-304.
Harris, D. & Helfat, C. 1997. Specificity of CEO human capital and compensation. Strategic Management Journal, 18(11): 895-920.
Helmich, D. L. & Brown, W. B. 1972. Successor type and organizational change in the corporate enterprise. Administrative Science Quarterly: 371-381.
Henderson, A. D., Miller, D., & Hambrick, D. C. 2006. How quickly do CEOs become obsolete? Industry dynamism, CEO tenure, and company performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27(5): 447-460.
Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & management, B. J. C. J. o. 2009. Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6): 1404-1427.
Hoitash, U. & Mkrtchyan, A. 2022. Internal governance and outside directors’ connections to non-director executives. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 73(1): 101436.
Holmqvist, M. 2003. A dynamic model of intra-and interorganizational learning. Organization Studies, 24(1): 95-123.
Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A., Johnson, R. A., & Grossman, W. 2002. Conflicting voices: The effects of institutional ownership heterogeneity and internal governance on corporate innovation strategies. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4): 697-716.
Jensen, M., Potočnik, K., & Chaudhry, S. 2020. A mixed-methods study of CEO transformational leadership and firm performance. European Management Journal, 38(6): 836-845.
Kammerlander, N., Burger, D., Fust, A., & Fueglistaller, U. 2015. Exploration and exploitation in established small and medium-sized enterprises: The effect of CEOs' regulatory focus. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(4): 582-602.
Kang, Y., Zhu, D. H., & Zhang, Y. A. 2021. Being extraordinary: How CEOS' uncommon names explain strategic distinctiveness. Strategic Management Journal, 42(2): 462-488.
Karaevli, A. 2007. Performance consequences of new CEO ‘Outsiderness’: Moderating effects of pre‐and post‐succession contexts. Strategic Management Journal, 28(7): 681-706.
Karaevli, A. & Zajac, E. J. 2013. When do outsider CEOs generate strategic change? The enabling role of corporate stability. Journal of Management Studies, 50(7): 1267-1294.
Kavadis, N., Heyden, M. L., & Sidhu, J. S. 2022. Fresh in the saddle: The influence of a new CEO's vision and origin, and CEO succession type on market actors' reactions. Long Range Planning, 55(2): 102050.
Keil, T., Lavie, D., & Pavićević, S. 2022. When do outside CEOs Underperform? From a CEO-centric to a stakeholder-centric perspective of post-succession performance. Academy of Management Journal, 65(5): 1424-1449.
Kesner, I. F. & Sebora, T. C. 1994. Executive succession: Past, present & future. Journal of Management, 20(2): 327-372.
Khan, R., Dharwadkar, R., & Brandes, P. 2005. Institutional ownership and CEO compensation: a longitudinal examination. Journal of Business Research, 58(8): 1078-1088.
Kim, Y. S., Kang, S.-A., & Seol, I. 2018. The effect of the owner CEO on the relation between CEO compensation and firm performance: Korean case. . Global Business & Finance Review (GBFR), 23(3): 81-97.
Kiss, A. N., Cortes, A. F., & Herrmann, P. 2022. CEO proactiveness, innovation, and firm performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 33(3): 101545.
Kochhar, R. & David, P. 1996. Institutional investors and firm innovation: A test of competing hypotheses. Strategic Management Journal, 17(1): 73-84.
Kosnik, R. D. 1987. Greenmail: A study of board performance in corporate governance. Administrative Science Quarterly: 163-185.
Kotter, J. P. 1982. General managers are not generalists. Organizational Dynamics.
Lauterbach, B., Vu, J., & Weisberg, J. 1999. Internal vs. external successions and their effect on firm performance. Human Relations, 52: 1485-1504.
Lee, E. Y. & Tsai, W. 2024. External disruption following CEO succession: How human and social capital changes may attract competitive attacks. Academy of Management Journal, 67(3): 625-647.
Lee, H. L., Padmanabhan, V., & Whang, S. 1997. The bullwhip effect in supply chains.
Lee, J. M., Yoon, D., & Boivie, S. 2020. Founder CEO succession: The role of CEO organizational identification. Academy of Management Journal, 63(1): 224-245.
Levinthal, D. A. & March, J. G. 1993. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2): 95-112.
Lin, H.-E., Yu, A., Stambaugh, J., Tsao, C.-W., Wang, R. J.-H., & Hsu, I.-C. 2023. Family CEO duality and research and development intensity in public family enterprises: Temporality as a model boundary. Journal of Business Research, 158: 113572.
Liu, X. & Xue, Y. 2020. Can outside CEO successors bring innovation to firms? Evidence from China. Chinese Management Studies, 14(4): 935-956.
Lo, H.-C. & Shiah-Hou, S.-R. 2022. The effect of CEO power on overinvestment. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 59(1): 23-63.
Luo, Y. 2003. Industrial dynamics and managerial networking in an emerging market: The case of China. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13): 1315-1327.
Ma, S., Seidl, D., & Guérard, S. 2015. The new CEO and the post‐succession process: An integration of past research and future directions. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17(4): 460-482.
Ma, S. & Seidl, D. 2018. New CEOs and their collaborators: Divergence and convergence between the strategic leadership constellation and the top management team. Strategic Management Journal, 39(3): 606-638.
Magnusson, P. & Boggs, D. J. 2006. International experience and CEO selection: An empirical study. Journal of International Management, 12(1): 107-125.
Mahto, R. V., Cavazos, D. E., Calabrò, A., & Vanevenhoven, J. P. 2023. CEO succession game in family firms: Owners vs. advisors. Journal of Small Business Management, 61(6): 2714-2731.
Majocchi, A., Bacchiocchi, E., & Mayrhofer, U. 2005. Firm size, business experience and export intensity in SMEs: A longitudinal approach to complex relationships. International Business Review, 14(6): 719-738.
Malmendier, U. & Tate, G. 2005. CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. The Journal of Finance, 60(6): 2661-2700.
March, J. G. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm: Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Meckling, W. H. & Jensen, M. C. 1976. Theory of the Firm. Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.
Miles, M. P., Covin, J. G., & Heeley, M. B. 2000. The relationship between environmental dynamism and small firm structure, strategy, and performance. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 8(2): 63-78.
Minichilli, A., Nordqvist, M., Corbetta, G., & Amore, M. D. 2014. CEO succession mechanisms, organizational context, and performance: A socio‐emotional wealth perspective on family‐controlled firms. Journal of Management Studies, 51(7): 1153-1179.
Mishina, Y., Pollock, T. G., & Porac, J. F. 2004. Are more resources always better for growth? Resource stickiness in market and product expansion. Strategic Management Journal, 25(12): 1179-1197.
Mizruchi, M. S. 1983. Who controls whom? An examination of the relation between management and boards of directors in large American corporations. Academy of Management Review, 8(3): 426-435.
Nahavandi, A. & Malekzadeh, A. R. 1993. Leader style in strategy and organizational performance: An integrative framework. Journal of Management Studies, 30(3): 405-425.
Ocasio, W. 1994. Political dynamics and the circulation of power: CEO succession in US industrial corporations, 1960-1990. Administrative Science Quarterly: 285-312.
Oh, W.-Y., Cha, J., & Chang, Y. K. 2017. Does ownership structure matter? The effects of insider and institutional ownership on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 146: 111-124.
Oosthuizen, H. 1997. An evaluation of the relevance of the Miles & Snow strategic typology under present-day conditions of major environmental uncertainty-the emperor's new clothes or a paradigm shift? South African Journal of Business Management, 28(2): 63-72.
Palmer, T. B. & Wiseman, R. M. 1999. Decoupling risk taking from income stream uncertainty: A holistic model of risk. Strategic Management Journal, 20(11): 1037-1062.
Pan, X., Chen, X., & Ning, L. 2018. Exploitative technological diversification, environmental contexts, and firm performance. Management Decision, 56(7): 1613-1629.
Pandey, R., Vithessonthi, C., & Mansi, M. 2015. Busy CEOs and the performance of family firms. Research in International Business and Finance, 33: 144-166.
Papadakis, V. M. & Barwise, P. 2002. How much do CEOs and top managers matter in strategic decision‐making? British Journal of management, 13(1): 83-95.
Parrino, R. 1997. CEO turnover and outside succession a cross-sectional analysis. Journal of financial Economics, 46(2): 165-197.
Pfeffer, J. 1987. A resource dependence perspective on intercorporate relations. Intercorporate relations: The structural analysis of business, 1(1): 25-55.
Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G. 2015. External control of organizations—Resource dependence perspective, Organizational behavior 2: 355-370: Routledge.
Porter, M. E. 1980. Industry structure and competitive strategy: Keys to profitability. Financial Analysts Journal, 36(4): 30-41.
Quigley, T. J. & Hambrick, D. C. 2012. When the former CEO stays on as board chair: Effects on successor discretion, strategic change, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(7): 834-859.
Quigley, T. J., Hambrick, D. C., Misangyi, V. F., & Rizzi, G. A. 2019. CEO selection as risk-taking: A new vantage on the debate about the consequences of insiders versus outsiders. Strategic Management Journal, 40(9): 1453-1470.
Ramachandran, I. 2018. Triggering absorptive capacity in organizations: CEO succession as a knowledge enabler. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(8): 1844-1864.
Rue, L. W. & Holland, P. G. 1986. Strategic management: Concepts and experiences. (No Title).
Saidu, S. 2019. CEO characteristics and firm performance: focus on origin, education and ownership. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 9(1): 29.
Salancik, G. R. & Pfeffer, J. 1978. A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly: 224-253.
Sariol, A. M. & Abebe, M. A. 2017. The influence of CEO power on explorative and exploitative organizational innovation. Journal of Business Research, 73: 38-45.
Schepker, D. J., Kim, Y., Patel, P. C., Thatcher, S. M., & Campion, M. C. 2017. CEO succession, strategic change, and post-succession performance: A meta-analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(6): 701-720.
Shen, W. & Cannella, A. A. 2002a. Power dynamics within top management and their impacts on CEO dismissal followed by inside succession. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6): 1195-1206.
Shen, W. & Cannella, A. A. 2002b. Revisiting the performance consequences of CEO succession: The impacts of successor type, postsuccession senior executive turnover, and departing CEO tenure. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4): 717-733.
Shin, S., Lee, J., & Bansal, P. 2022. From a shareholder to stakeholder orientation: Evidence from the analyses of CEO dismissal in large US firms. Strategic Management Journal, 43(7): 1233-1257.
Singh, J. V. 1986. Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 29(3): 562-585.
Stettner, U. & Lavie, D. 2014. Ambidexterity under scrutiny: Exploration and exploitation via internal organization, alliances, and acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 35(13): 1903-1929.
Su, Y., Xia, J., Zahra, S. A., & Ding, J. 2023. Family CEO successor and firm performance: The moderating role of sustainable HRM practices and corporate philanthropy. Human Resource Management, 62(3): 307-330.
Tan, J. & Peng, M. W. 2003. Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: Two studies from an emerging economy. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13): 1249-1263.
Thompson, R. F. 1967. Foundations of physiological psychology.
Tian, J., Haleblian, J., & Rajagopalan, N. 2011. The effects of board human and social capital on investor reactions to new CEO selection. Strategic Management Journal, 32(7): 731-747.
Tushman, M. L. & Romanelli, E. 1985. Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. Research in Organizational Behavior.
Uzzi, B. 1996. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review: 674-698.
Vanacker, T., Collewaert, V., & Zahra, S. A. 2017. Slack resources, firm performance, and the institutional context: Evidence from privately held E uropean firms. Strategic Management Journal, 38(6): 1305-1326.
Virany, B., Tushman, M. L., & Romanelli, E. 1992. Executive succession and organization outcomes in turbulent environments: An organization learning approach. Organization Science, 3(1): 72-91.
Volberda, H. W. 1996. Toward the flexible form: How to remain vital in hypercompetitive environments. Organization Science, 7(4): 359-374.
Voss, G. B. & Voss, Z. G. 2000. Strategic orientation and firm performance in an artistic environment. Journal of marketing, 64(1): 67-83.
Voss, G. B., Sirdeshmukh, D., & Voss, Z. G. 2008. The effects of slack resources and environmentalthreat on product exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management journal, 51(1): 147-164.
Wernerfelt, B. & Montgomery, C. A. 1988. Tobin's q and the importance of focus in firm performance. The American Economic Review: 246-250.
Wholey, D. R. & Brittain, J. 1989. Characterizing environmental variation. Academy of Management Journal, 32(4): 867-882.
Wiersema, M. F. 1992. Strategic consequences of executive succession within diversified firms. Journal of Management Studies, 29(1): 73-94.
Wiersema, M. F. & Bantel, K. A. 1993. Top management team turnover as an adaptation mechanism: The role of the environment. Strategic Management Journal, 14(7): 485-504.
Wiersema, M. F. 1995. Executive succession as an antecedent to corporate restructuring. Human Resource Management, 34(1): 185-202.
Xu, E., Yang, H., Quan, J. M., & Lu, Y. 2015. Organizational slack and corporate social performance: Empirical evidence from China’s public firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32: 181-198.
Yamakawa, Y., Yang, H., & Lin, Z. J. 2011. Exploration versus exploitation in alliance portfolio: Performance implications of organizational, strategic, and environmental fit. Research Policy, 40(2): 287-296.
Yi, X., Zhang, Y. A., & Windsor, D. 2020. You are great and I am great (too): Examining new CEOs’ social influence behaviors during leadership transition. Academy of Management Journal, 63(5): 1508-1534.
Zahra, S. A. 1996. Goverance, ownership, and corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating impact of industry technological opportunities. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6): 1713-1735.
Zajac, E. J. 1990. CEO selection, succession, compensation and firm performance: A theoretical integration and empirical analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 11(3): 217-230.
Zajac, E. J. & Westphal, J. D. 1996. Who shall succeed? How CEO/board preferences and power affect the choice of new CEOs. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1): 64-90.
Zajac, E. J., Kraatz, M. S., & Bresser, R. K. 2000. Modeling the dynamics of strategic fit: A normative approach to strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 21(4): 429-453.
Zhang, Y. & Rajagopalan, N. 2004. When the known devil is better than an unknown god: An empirical study of the antecedents and consequences of relay CEO successions. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4): 483-500.
Zhang, Y. & Rajagopalan, N. 2010. Once an outsider, always an outsider? CEO origin, strategic change, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3): 334-346.
Zhu, D. H. & Shen, W. 2016. Why do some outside successions fare better than others? The role of outside CEOs' prior experience with board diversity. Strategic Management Journal, 37(13): 2695-2708.
Zhu, Q., Hu, S., & Shen, W. 2020. Why do some insider CEOs make more strategic changes than others? The impact of prior board experience on new CEO insiderness. Strategic Management Journal, 41(10): 1933-1951.
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/99496-
dc.description.abstract在企業邁向永續發展的過程中,企業傳承是其生命週期中最重要的事件之一。新上任者的特質往往會直接影響企業績效。建立於內部與外部繼任者抉擇的理論論點之上,本研究蒐集從2009年到2020年間美國上市公司的資料,以實證研究來描述企業傳承者類型(內部或外部)與企業傳承後績效之間的關係。本研究從策略契合理論與企業行為理論的雙重視角出發,分析環境與組織層次變數(產業環境、所有權結構、組織寬裕資源及事業策略)如何形塑企業傳承者類別與企業績效之間的關聯性。雖然內部及外部繼任者都有各自的優勢來面對繼任後的挑戰,根據對美國上市公司的探討,研究結果表示內部繼任者帶來的效益會大於外部繼任者。準確地說,內部繼任者會在以下條件中表現更為優異:(a) 低環境豐富度;(b) 高環境動盪度以及;(c) 低內部所有權。除此之外,本研究亦分析了組織寬裕資源和事業策略的調節作用,以及短、長期績效影響。其結果顯示內部繼任者在短期內透過成本領先策略表現較好,從長期來看透過差異化策略表現較好。相反,外部繼任者透過高吸附性寬裕資源和差異化策略下能實現更高的短期績效,而長期收益則與未吸附性寬裕資和成本領導策略相關。這項研究強調了考慮繼任者類型和各種公司特定特徵之間的調節作用以及時間對績效結果的影響的重要性。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractIn light of the increasing awareness of sustainable enterprise development, corporate succession represents a fundamental yet critical event in a firm’s life cycle. The characteristics of new successors are expected to have a direct impact on the firm. Amid theoretical debates regarding the selection of internal versus external successors, this study employs empirical research spanning from 2009 to 2020 to elucidate the relationship between succession type (internal or external) and a firm’s post-succession performance. Additionally, following two streams (strategic fit concept and behavioral theory of corporate), this research examines the moderating effects of multi-level contextual factors, specifically industry environment, ownership structure, organizational slack, and business strategy, on this relationship. Drawing from U.S. publicly traded firms, this research highlights that both internal and external successors may attain superior post-succession outcomes by capitalizing on their unique strengths, thus offering nuanced insights into leadership transition effectiveness. Moreover, the relationship between inside CEO successors is notably strengthened under conditions of (a) lower environmental munificence, (b) higher environmental dynamism, and (c) lower insider ownership. Besides, this study also examines the interaction effects of organizational slack and business strategy, along with the short- and long-term performance impact. Specifically, the findings reveal that internal successors tend to excel in the short term under cost leadership strategies; however, over the long term, differentiation strategies appear to produce more sustained performance benefits. Conversely, outside successors achieve higher short-term performance with high-absorbed slack and differentiation strategies, while long-term gains are linked to unabsorbed slack and cost leadership strategies. This research underscores the importance of considering the interaction between succession type and multiple firm-specific characteristics, along with the time effects on performance outcomes.en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-09-10T16:28:03Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2025-09-10T16:28:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents誌謝 i
中文摘要 ii
ABSTRACT iii
CONTENTS v
LIST OF FIGURES vii
LIST OF TABLES viii
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Research Background 1
1.2 Research Question 5
1.3 Research Procedure 6
1.3.1 The Organization of This Study 6
1.3.2 Research Flow 7
Chapter 2 Literature Review and Hypotheses 8
2.1 CEO Succession and Firm Performance 8
2.2 Inside vs. Outside CEO Succession 9
2.3 The Moderating Effect of Industry Environment and Ownership Structure:
The Strategic Fit Concept 12
2.3.1 Industry Environment 14
2.3.2 Ownership Structure 18
2.4 The Nature of CEO Succession and Time Effect 21
2.5 The Moderating Effects of Organizational Slack and Business Strategy: The Behavioral Theory Perspective 23
2.5.1 Organizational Slack 25
2.5.2 Business Strategy 28
Chapter 3 Research Framework and Methodology 32
3.1 Research Framework 32
3.2 Data and Sample 33
3.3 Measures 35
3.3.1 Dependent variables 35
3.3.2 Independent variables 36
3.3.3 Moderating variables 36
3.3.4 Control variables 38
3.4 Analysis 38
Character 4 Results 40
4.1 The empirical results for study 1 40
4.2 The empirical results for study 2 46
Character 5 Discussion and Conclusion 55
5.1 Theoretical Implications 57
5.2 Practical Implications 61
5.3 Limitations and Future Research 65
REFERENCE 68
-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject行為理論zh_TW
dc.subject所有權結構zh_TW
dc.subject寬裕資源zh_TW
dc.subject產業環境zh_TW
dc.subject公司績效zh_TW
dc.subject事業策略zh_TW
dc.subject企業傳承zh_TW
dc.subject策略適配性zh_TW
dc.subjectfirm performanceen
dc.subjectbusiness strategyen
dc.subjectorganizational slacken
dc.subjectownership structureen
dc.subjectindustry environmenten
dc.subjectbehavioral theoryen
dc.subjectstrategic fiten
dc.subjectCEO successionen
dc.title企業傳承者類別對公司績效的影響—以產業環境、所有權結構、寬裕資源與競爭策略作為調節變數zh_TW
dc.titleCorporate Succession Type and Firm Performance—The Moderating Effects of Industry Environment, Ownership Structure, Organizational Slack, and Business Strategy.en
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear113-2-
dc.description.degree博士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee洪世章;林博文;林俊裕;陳彥君;陳宥杉zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeShih-Chang Hung;Bou-Wen Lin;Jun-You Lin;Yen-Chun Chen;Yu-Shan Chenen
dc.subject.keyword企業傳承,策略適配性,行為理論,產業環境,所有權結構,寬裕資源,事業策略,公司績效,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordCEO succession,strategic fit,behavioral theory,industry environment,ownership structure,organizational slack,business strategy,firm performance,en
dc.relation.page76-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202501300-
dc.rights.note未授權-
dc.date.accepted2025-07-03-
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept商學研究所-
dc.date.embargo-liftN/A-
顯示於系所單位:商學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-113-2.pdf
  未授權公開取用
1.57 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved