廉能治理中的透明、參與及協力：以淡江大橋廉政平臺為例

Abstract

隨著開放政府與反貪腐趨勢受到各國政府與國際性組織的重視，以及我國行政院公共工程委員會放寬政府採購最有利標之適用條件，如何提升政府採購開放程度，防止貪腐事件發生，促成公共工程順利辦理，成為治理的重要課題。對此，法務部廉政署於2016年提出機關採廉政平臺政策，強調跨域合作、公私協力、行政透明與全民監督四項原則。然而，廉政平臺政策實施至今（2025年）已將近十年，相關學術研究相對有限，作為政府近年來積極推動之重點政策，實有必要對政策實施成效與學術意涵等面向進行探討。 為填補當前研究的空缺，本研究從開放政府觀點出發，以行政透明、公民參與及協力治理為理論基礎，結合開放契約策略，從交通部淡江大橋廉政平臺個案經驗，探討廉政平臺在政府重大採購案中，如何提升行政透明、促進公民參與、推動協力治理，其實務運作成效與當前面臨挑戰為何。在研究方法上，本研究首先就淡江大橋廉政平臺所公開之資料進行分析，而後針對利害關係人進行深度訪談，嘗試從多元視角理解平臺運作過程，討論當前政策施行成效與尚待加強之處。 透過研究發現，在行政透明面向，廉政平臺透過網站揭露工程資訊，有助於提升信任與減少質疑，但仍有選擇性揭露之情形，使資訊完整性受限；在公民參與面向，平臺運作有納入部分環保團體與專家學者，民眾則可透過向機關陳情、全民督工系統表達意見，在地溝通獲得強化，但目前仍未開放制度性主動參與管道，參與程度仍然有限；在協力治理面向，平臺透過聯繫會議促成了各機關與廠商之間的對話，確實增進行為者之間的交流與理解，然而由於平臺並無決策功能，因此協力產出多為資訊交流、資源整合與共識建立方面，而非就具體事項作出決策。綜合而言，廉政平臺已初步實踐開放契約精神，惟作法仍有持續優化的空間。

With the growing global emphasis on Open Government and anti-corruption initiatives by governments and international organizations, enhancing transparency in public procurement has become a critical governance issue. In Taiwan, the Public Construction Commission Executive Yuan has relaxed restrictions on the use of the most advantageous tendering method, further highlighting the urgency of improving procurement openness to prevent corruption and ensure the successful implementation of public works projects. In response, the Agency Against Corruption of the Ministry of Justice launched the Government Procurement Integrity Platform policy in 2016, which is grounded in four key principles: cross-boundary collaboration, public-private partnerships, administrative transparency, and public oversight. However, nearly a decade into its implementation, the platform has received limited academic attention. Despite its position as an important policy, its practical outcomes and theoretical implications remain underexplored. This study aims to address this research gap by analyzing the case of the Danjiang Bridge Integrity Platform, situated within a major infrastructure procurement project overseen by the Ministry of Transportation and Communications. Drawing on the theoretical foundations of open government, this research incorporates the concepts of administrative transparency, citizen participation, and collaborative governance, along with the principles of open contracting. It examines how the Integrity Platform facilitates transparency, promotes participation, and supports cross-sector collaboration in practice, while also identifying current implementation challenges. Methodologically, this study combines document analysis of publicly available materials related to the Danjiang Bridge Integrity Platform with in-depth interviews conducted with key stakeholders. This multi-perspective approach enables a comprehensive understanding of the platform's operational dynamics. The findings indicate that, in terms of administrative transparency, the platform enhances trust and reduces suspicion by disclosing project information online. However, issues of selective disclosure limit the completeness and usefulness of the information. Regarding citizen participation, the platform has engaged environmental civic groups and experts, while residents can express concerns via formal complaints or through a public construction supervision system. Nonetheless, the absence of institutionalized channels for proactive public engagement restricts the depth of participation. In terms of collaborative governance, inter-agency coordination meetings have facilitated communication among government units and contractors, contributing to mutual understanding and information exchange. Yet, the platform lacks formal decision-making authority, and thus its outputs are largely limited to consensus-building, resource coordination, and information sharing rather than substantive policy decisions. Overall, the Integrity Platform demonstrates initial progress in applying open contracting principles but still presents opportunities for further refinement and institutional strengthening.