請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/99293完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 左正東 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Chen-Dong Tso | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 李于晴 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu-Qing Lee | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-08-21T17:09:27Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-08-22 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-08-21 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-08-05 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Books and Book Chapters
Abdul Rahman, T., Putra al-Haj. (1984). Malaysia: The Road to Independence. Pelanduk Publications. Allen, J. d. V. (1967). The Malayan Union. Southeast Asia Studies, Yale University. Amrith, S. S. (2011). Migration and Diaspora in Modern Asia. Cambridge University Press. Andaya, B. W., & Andaya, L. Y. (2001). A History of Malaysia (3 ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. Arendt, H. (1951). The Origins of Totalitarianism. Schocken Books. Baker, J. (2008). Crossroads: A Popular History of Malaysia and Singapore (2 ed.). Marshall Cavendish. Barabantseva, E. (2011). Overseas Chinese, Ethnic Minorities, and Nationalism: De-centering China. Routledge. Bauböck, R., Ersbøll, E., Groenendijk, K., & Waldrauch, H. (2006). Acquisition and Loss of Nationality|Volume 1: Comparative Analyses. Amsterdam University Press. Berenschot, W., Nordholt, H. S., & Bakker, L. (2017). Introduction: Citizenship and democratization in postcolonial Southeast Asia. In Citizenship and Democratization in Southeast Asia (pp. 1–28). Brill. Brubaker, R. (1992a). Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany (1st ed.). Harvard University Press. Brubaker, R. (1992b). The French Revolution and the Invention of National Citizenship. In R. Brubaker (Ed.), Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany (pp. 35–49). Harvard University Press. Capoccia, G. (2016). Critical Junctures. In O. Fioretos, T. G. Falleti, & A. Sheingare (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism (pp. 89–106). Oxford University Press. Cheah, B. K. (1983). Red Star Over Malaya: Resistance and Social Conflict During and After the Japanese Occupation, 1941-1946. Singapore. Christie, C. J. (1998). Southeast Asia in the Twentieth Century: A Reader. I. B. Tauris. Collier, R. B., & Collier, D. (2002). Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. University of Notre Dame Press. Coppel, C. A. (1982). The Position of the Chinese in the Philippines, Malaysia and Indonesia. In C. A. Coppel & H. Mabbett (Eds.), The Chinese in Indonesia, the Philippines and Malaysia (2nd ed., pp. 2–16). Minority Rights Group. Crawford, J. (2019). Brownlie's Principles of Public International Law (9th Edition) (9th ed.). Oxford University Press. Fernando, J. M. (2002). The Making of the Malayan Constitution. Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society. Fernando, J. M. (2012a). The Cold War, Malayan decolonization and the making of the Federation of Malaysia. In A. Lau (Ed.), Southeast Asia and the Cold War (pp. 67–84). Routledge. FitzGerald, D. S. (2017). The history of racialized citizenship. In A. Shachar, R. Bauböck, I. Bloemraad, & M. Vink (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of citizenship (pp. 129–152). Oxford University Press. Fitzgerald, S. (1972). China and the Overseas Chinese: A study of Peking's Changing Policy, 1949-1970. Cambridge University Press. Geri, M. (2018). Historical Institutionalism: Nationalism, Institutions and Citizenship of Ethnic Minorities. In M. Geri (Ed.), Ethnic Minorities in Democratizing Muslim Countries: Turkey and Indonesia (pp. 181–200). Palgrave Macmillan. Hack, K. (2021). The Malayan Emergency: Revolution and Counterinsurgency at the End of Empire. Cambridge University Press. Hailbronner, K. (2006). Nationality in public international law and european law. In R. Bauböck, E. Ersbøll, K. Groenendijk, & H. Waldrauch (Eds.), Acquisition and Loss of Nationality|Volume 1: Comparative Analyses (pp. 35–104). Amsterdam University Press. Hansen, R. (2001). From Subjects to Citizens: Immigration and Nationality Law in the United Kingdom. In R. Hansen & P. Weil (Eds.), Towards a European Nationality: Citizenship, Immigration, and Nationality Law in the EU (pp. 69–94). Palgrave Macmilan. Hara, F. (2003). Malayan Chinese and China: Conversion in Identity Consciousness 1945-1957. NUS Press. Harding, A. (2024). Power Sharing in Malaysia: Coalition Politics and the Social Contract. In E. W. Aboultaif, S. Keil, & A. McCulloch (Eds.), Power-Sharing in the Global South: Patterns, Practices, and Potentials (pp. 169–188). Palgrave Macmillan. Harper, T. N. (2001). The End of Empire and the Making of Malaya (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. Heng, P. K. (1988). Chinese Politics in Malaysia: A History of the Malaysian Chinese Association. Oxford University Press. Kennedy, J. (1962). A History of Malaya A.D. 1400-1959. Palgrave Macmillan. Kinninmont, J. (2013). Citizenship in the Gulf. In A. Echagüe (Ed.), The Gulf States and the Arab Uprisings: Time to Embrace Change (pp. 47–58). FRIDE. Klusmeyer, D. (2000). Introduction. In T. A. Aleinikoff & D. Klusmeyer (Eds.), From Migrants to Citizens: Membership in a Changing World (pp. 1–21). Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Lau, A. (1991a). The Creation of Malayan Union Citizenship. In A. Lau (Ed.), The Malayan Union Controversy 1942-1948 (pp. 64–78). Oxford University Press. Lau, A. (1991b). The Malayan Union Controversy 1942-1948. Oxford University Press. Lau, A. K. H. (1988). The Colonial Office and the Emergence of the Malayan Union Policy 1942-1943. In R. B. Smith & A. J. Stockwell (Eds.), British Policy and the Transfer of Power in Asia: Documentary Perspectives (pp. 95–125). School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London. Lee, H.-A. (2023). Malaysia’s New Economic Policy and Affirmative Action: A Remedy in Need of a Rethink. In A. Deshpande (Ed.), Handbook on Economics of Discrimination and Affirmative Action (pp. 819–839). Springer. Lipset, S. M., & Rokkan, S. (1967). Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-national Perspectives. Free Press. Loh, F. K.-W. (1989). Beyond the Tin Mines: Coolies, Squatters, and New Villagers in the Kinta Valley, Malaysia, C. 1880-1980. Oxford University Press. Low, C. C. (2022). The Malayan Emergency and the desinicization of the Malayan Chinese. In J. E. Taylor & L. Xu (Eds.), Chineseness and the Cold War: Contested Cultures and Diaspora in Southeast Asia and Hong Kong (pp. 45–60). Routledge. Marshall, T. H., & Bottomore, T. (1992). Citizenship and Social Class. (Vol. 11). Cambridge New York. Mauzy, D. (1993). Malay political hegemony and 'coercive consociationalism'. In J. McGarry & B. O'Leary (Eds.), The Politics of Ethnic Conflict Regulation (pp. 106–127). Routledge. Means, G. P. (1970). Malaysian Politics. New York University Press. Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case Study Research in Education: A Qualitative Approach. Jossey-Bass. Miller, H. (1959). Prince and Premier: A Biography of Tunku Abdul Rahman Putra Al-Haj, First Prime Minister of the Federation of Malaya. George G. Harrap & Co. Mohamad, M. (2005). Ethnicity and Inequality in Malaysia: A Retrospect and A Rethinking. Opper, M. (2020). The Malayan Emergency, 1948-1960. In M. Opper (Ed.), People's Wars in China, Malaya, and Vietnam (pp. 173–204). University of Michigan Press. Petcharamesree, S. (2023). Borders, Citizenship,‘Imagined Community’and ‘Exclusive State’and Migration in Southeast Asia. In S. Petcharamesree & M. P. Capaldi (Eds.), Migration in Southeast Asia: IMISCOE Regional Reader (pp. 23–38). Springer Purcell, V. (1954). Malaya: Communist or Free? Stanford University Press. Purcell, V. (1967). The Chinese in Malaya. Oxford University Press. Ratnam, K. J. (1965). Communalism and the Political Process in Malaya. University of Malaya. Rokkan, S. (1970). Citizens, Elections, Parties: Approaches to the Comparative Study of the Processes of Development. David McKay. Sheridan, L. A. (1961). The Federation of Malaya Constitution: Text, Annotations and Commentary. University of Malaya Law Review. Short, A. (2000). In Pursuit of Mountain Rats: The Communist Insurrection in Malaya. Cultured Lotus. Stockwell, A. J. (1979). British policy and Malay politics during the Malayan Union experiment, 1942-1948. Council of Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society Stockwell, A. J. (2000). The United States and Britain’s Decolonization of Malaya, 1942–57. In D. Ryan & V. Pungong (Eds.), The United States and Decolonization: Power and Freedom (pp. 188–206). Palgrace Macmillan. Suryadinata, L. (2015). The Making of Southeast Asian Nations: State, Ethnicity, Indigenism and Citizenship (1st ed.). World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. Tan, C. L. (1947). Malayan Problems: From a Chinese Point of View. Tannsco. Tan, T. Y. (2008). Creating ‘Greater Malaysia’: Decolonization and the Politics of Merger. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. Thelen, K. (2003). How Institutions Evolve: Insights from Comparative Historical Analysis. In J. Mahoney & D. Rueschemeyer (Eds.), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences (pp. 208–240). Cambridge University Press. Turnbull, C. M. (1977). A History of Singapore, 1819-1975. Oxford University Press. von Vorys, K. (1975). Democracy Without Consensus: Communalism and Political Stability in Malaysia. Princeton University Press. Waldrauch, H. (2006). Acquisition of nationality. In H. Waldrauch, R. Bauböck, E. Ersbøll, & K. Groenendijk (Eds.), Acquisition and Loss of Nationality|Volume 1: Comparative Analyses (pp. 121–182). Amsterdam University Press. Walters, R. (2020). The Nation State, National Identity and Citizenship. In R. Walters (Ed.), National Identity and Social Cohesion in a Time of Geopolitical and Economic Tension: Australia – European Union – Slovenia (pp. 13–40). Springer. Weil, P. (2001). Access to Citizenship: A Comparison of Twenty-Five Nationality Laws. In T. A. Aleinikoff & D. B. Klusmeyer (Eds.), Citizenship Today: Global Perspectives and Practices (pp. 17–34). Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Weil, P. (2008). How to Be French: Nationality in the Making since 1789 (C. Porter, Trans.). Duke University Press. Wong, D. T. K. (2012). View from the other side: The early Cold War in Malaysia from the memoirs and writings of former MCP members. In A. Lau (Ed.), Southeast Asia and the Cold War (pp. 85–101). Routledge. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (5th ed.). SAGE. Journal Articles and Conferences Proceedings Ahmad, M., Arifin, A., Zain, F. M., Pakri, R., & Jasni, S. A. (2019). Anglo-Siamese Treaty Of 1909: Its Implications On Kelantan’s Political And Delineation Status. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. Role(s) and Relevance of Humanities for Sustainable Development. Amin, N. S. M., & Afandi, N. H. M. B. (2023). An Analysis of the Constitutional Principles of Equality and Affirmative Action vis-à-vis Employment in Malaysia. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 20(4), 199–207. Armstrong, C. (2021). Key Methods Used in Qualitative Document Analysis. OSF Preprints, 1(9). Azfar, M. R., Muslim, N., Khalid, K. A. T., & Yaacob, M. (2024). The Malaysian Social Contract: A Historical Perspective. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(3), 150–160. Bassett, D. K. (1960). European influence in the Malay Peninsula 1511–1786. Journal of the Malayan Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, 33(3), 9–31. Bassett, D. K. (1963). European Influence in South-East Asia, c.1500-1630. Journal of Southeast Asian History, 4(2), 134–165. Bersalli, G., Tröndle, T., Heckmann, L., & Lilliestam, J. (2024). Economic crises as critical junctures for policy and structural changes towards decarbonization – the cases of Spain and Germany. Climate Policy, 24(3), 410–427. Bisschop, W. R. (1943). Nationality in International Law. American Journal of International Law, 37(2), 320–325. Bowen, G. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. Bright, C., & Du Preez, E. (2023). Narrative Analysis: Demonstrating the Iterative Process for New Researchers. Narratives Works: Issues, Investigations, & Interventions, 12(1), 39–63. Brubaker, R., & Kim, J. (2011). Transborder Membership Politics in Germany and Korea. European Journal of Sociology, 52(1), 21–75. Capoccia, G., & Kelemen, R. D. (2007). The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism. World politics, 59(3), 341–369. Carnell, F. G. (1952). Malayan Citizenship Legislation. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 1(4), 504–518. Carnell, F. G. (1954). Constitutional Reform and Elections in Malaya. Pacific Affairs, 27(3), 216–235. Carnell, F. G. (1955). The Malayan Elections. Pacific Affairs, 28(4), 315–330. Cassuto, T. (2001). Identity and Nationality. 2nd European Conference on Nationality: Challenges to National and International Law on Nationality at the Beginning of the New Millennium, Strasbourg. Cheah, B. K. (1978). Malayan Chinese and the Citizenship Issue, 1945-48. Review of Indonesian Malayan Affairs, 12(2), 95–122. Cheah, B. K. (2009). The Communist Insurgency in Malaysia, 1948–90: Contesting the Nation-State and Social Change. New Zealand Journal of Asian Studies, 11(1), 132–152. Chen, A. H. Y. (2023). The Evolution of Modern Chinese Nationality Law: A Historical Perspective. China Review, 23(2), 123–147. Chin, J. (2022). Racism towards the Chinese Minority in Malaysia: Political Islam and Institutional Barriers. The Political Quarterly, 93(3), 451–459. Corral, B. A. (2015). Nationality and Citizenship in the Spanish Constitutional Democracy. International Journal of Human Rights and Constitutional Studies, 3(2), 115–136. Dan, S. (2009). Chinese by Definition Nationality Law, Jus Sanguinis, and State Succession, 1909–1980. Twentieth-Century China, 35(1), 4–28. de Groot, G.-R., & Vonk, O. (2018). Acquisition of nationality by birth on a particular territory or establishment of parentage: global trends regarding ius sanguinis and ius soli. Netherlands International Law Review, 65(3), 319–335. Desai, D. S. (1969). The Portuguese Administration in Malacca, 1511–1641. Journal of Southeast Asian History, 10(3), 501–512. Erdal, M. B., & Sagmo, T. H. (2017). Descent, birthplace and residence: Aligning principles of citizenship with realities of migrant transnationalism. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift-Norwegian Journal of Geography, 71(4), 208–219. Farouk, A. F. A. F. (2011). Culture and Politics: An Analysis of United Malays National Organisation (UMNO) 1946-1999 Südostasien Working Papers No. 46 Berlin. Fernando, J. M. (2012b). Elite intercommunal bargaining and conflict resolution: The role of the Communities Liaison Committee in Malaya, 1949–51. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 43(2), 280–301. Fernando, J. M. (2015). Special Rights in the Malaysian Constitution and the Framers' Dilemma, 1956–57. The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 43(3), 535–556. Fitzgerald, D. (2005). Nationality and Migration in Modern Mexico. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31(1), 171–191. Ganczer, M. (2023). The impact of historical traditions on the regulation and practice of the preferential naturalization of Hungarians living outside the borders. Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, 63(4), 352–373. Goodman, J. R. (2021). Shirking the Briggs Plan: Civilian Resistance to Reform and the Army’s Struggle for Control in Malaya, 1950–1952. The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 49(4), 742–776. Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political studies, 44(5), 936–957. Henrard, K. (2018). The shifting parameters of nationality. Netherlands International Law Review, 65(3), 269–297. Honohan, I., & Rougier, N. (2018). Global Birthright Citizenship Laws: How Inclusive? Netherlands International Law Review, 65(3), 337–357. Jamal, M. A. (2015). The “Tiering” of Citizenship and Residency and the “Hierarchization” of Migrant Communities: The United Arab Emirates in Historical Context. International Migration Review, 49(3), 601–632. Kashiwazaki, C. (1998). Jus Sanguinis in Japan: The Origin of Citizenship in a Comparative Perspective. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 39(3), 278–301. Keo, B. Z. (2025). British Subjects by Birth, Imperial Citizens by Choice: The Straits Chinese and Cultural Citizenship in Colonial Malaya. Journal of British Studies, 64(1), 1–25. Lau, A. (1989). Malayan Union Citizenship: Constitutional Change and Controversy in Malaya, 1942-48. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 20(2), 216–243. Lee, H.-A. (2022). Malaysia’s New Economic Policy: Fifty Years of Polarization and Impasse. Southeast Asian Studies, 11(2), 299–329. Lee, H. G. (2013). Shades of Citizenship: Betwixt the Civic and the Ethnic. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 44(1), 1–23. Low, C. C. (2016). Immigration Control during the Malayan Emergency: Borders, Belonging and Citizenship, 1948–1960. Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, 89(1 (310), 35–60. Macgregor, I. A. (1955). Notes on the Portuguese in Malaya. Journal of the Malayan Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, 28(2 (170)), 4–47. Mahmud, T. (1997). Migration, Identity, & (and) the Colonial Encounter. Oregon Law Review, 76(3), 633–690. Mahmud, T. (1999). Colonialism and Modern Constructions of Race: A Preliminary Inquiry. University of Miami Law Review, 53(4), 1219–1246. Mahoney, J. (2000). Path Dependence in Historical Sociology. Theory and society, 29(4), 507–548. Manickam, S. (2014). Bridging the race barrier: Between “Sakai” and “Malay” in the Census categorisations of British Malaya. Asian Studies Review, 38(3), 367–384. Mihalache, L.-V. (2024). Between Displacement, Layering, Conversion and Drift: The Institutional Construction of the Romanian Freedom of Information Act. Perspectives of Law and Public Adminstration, 13(1), 107–120. Nasheeda, A., Abdullah, H. B., Krauss, S. E., & Ahmed, N. B. (2019). Transforming Transcripts Into Stories: A Multimethod Approach to Narrative Analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18. Ongkili, J. P. (1974). The British and Malayan Nationalism, 1946–1957. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 5(2), 255–277. Pierson, P. (1993). When effect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change. World politics, 45(4), 595–628. Pierson, P. (1996). The Path to European integration: A Historical Institutionalist Analysis. Comparative political studies, 29(2), 123–163. Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–267. Pietsch, J., & Clark, M. (2014). Citizenship rights in Malaysia: the experience of social and institutional discrimination among ethnic minorities. Citizenship Studies, 18(3-4), 303–314. Qin, X. (2025). Homeland and Ancestor - Social Identity and National Consciousness of Malaysia Chinese. Journal of Modern Social Sciences, 2(3), 210–214. Shachar, A., & Hirschl, R. (2007). Citizenship as inherited property. Political theory, 35(3), 253–287. Silving, H. (1956). Nationality in Comparative Law. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 5(3), 410–442. Soh, E. L. (1960). Tan Cheng Lock: His Leadership of the Malayan Chinese. Journal of Southeast Asian History, 1(1), 29–55. Sagoo, K. (2006). Colonial Construction of Malayness: The Influence of Population Size and Composition (International Graduate Student Conferences Series). Stenson, M. R. (1969). The Malayan Union and the Historians. Journal of Southeast Asian History, 10(2), 344–354. Stockwell, A. J. (1984). British imperial policy and decolonization in Malaya, 1942–52. The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 13(1), 68–87. Stockwell, A. J. (1987). Insurgency and Decolonisation during the Malayan Emergency. Journal of Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 25(1), 71–81. Stubbs, R. (1979). The United Malays National Organization, the Malayan Chinese Association, and the Early Years of the Malayan Emergency, 1948–1955. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 10(1), 77–88. Tadin, I. b. (1960). Dato Onn and Malay Nationalism, 1946-1951. Journal of Southeast Asian History, 1(1), 56–88. Tan, C. H. (2016). Private Ordering and the Chinese in Nineteenth Century Straits Settlements. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 11(1), 27–53. Titshaw, S. (2022). Inheriting Citizenship. Stanford Journal of International Law, 58(1), 1–62. Vink, M. P., & Bauböck, R. (2013). Citizenship configurations: Analysing the multiple purposes of citizenship regimes in Europe. Comparative European Politics, 11(5), 621–648. Wahab, H. A., Azhar, A., Anuar, H. M., & Mohamed, M. (2017). Equality vis-à-vis Affirmative Action from Different Perspectives. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW, GOVERNMENT AND COMMUNICATION (IJLGC), 2(6), 31–45. Wake, C. H. (1964). Malacca's Early Kings and the Reception of Islam. Journal of Southeast Asian History, 5(2), 104–128. Wan Husain, W. A. F. (2019). Article 153 of the Federal Constitution: Governing Principle for Affirmative Policy Against Social Injustice. Journal of Governance and Integrity, 5(1), 135–140. Wicaksana, I. G. W., Nauvarian, D., & Pramudia, P. S. (2023). ASEAN, COVID-19 and Myanmar crisis: Dealing with critical juncture. International Area Studies Review, 26(1), 40–54. Wilson, R. A. (2007). Combining Historical Research and Narrative Inquiry to Create Chronicles and Narratives The Quantitative Report, 12(1), 20–39. Winstedt, R. O. (1935). A History of Malaya. Journal of the Malayan Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, 13(1 (121)), iii–270. Wolff, L. (2014). Let's talk about lex: narrative analysis as both research method and teaching technique in law. The Adelaide Law Review, 34(1), 3–21. Yeo, K. W. (1969). A Study of Three Early Political Parties in Singapore, 1945-1955. Journal of Southeast Asian History, 10(1), 115–141. Yeo, K. W. (1973). The Anti-Federation Movement in Malaya, 1946-48. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 4(1), 31–51. Government and Legal Documents, Personal Documents Alliance National Council, M. (1956). Memorandum to the Reid Constitutional Commission on the Political Testament of the Alliance. In (The Tan Cheng Lock Private Papers ed.). Kuala Lumpur. BMA. (1946). [Pan-Malayan Malay Congress]: inward telegram no 08312 from HQ, British Military Adminstration (Malaya) to War Office. (CO 537/1548, no 50823/34 Part 1). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) Bourdillon, H. T. (1946a). 'Developments in Malayan constitutional discussions': note by H. T. Bourdillon on the deliberations of the Anglo-Malay working committee. (CO 537/1530 no 245). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) Bourdillon, H. T. (1946b). [Malay reactions to the White Paper]: minute by H. T. Bourdillon [Extract]. (CO 537/1538, no 44). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) Bourdillon, H. T. (1946c). [Malay reactions to the White Paper]: minute by H. T. Bourdillon of a CO departmental meeting [Extract]. (CO 537/1528). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) Bourdillon, H. T. (1946d). Malayan citizenship': note by H. T. Bourdillon. (CO 537/1543, no 106). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) Cabinet Malaya Committee, U. K. (1950). 'Federation plan for the elimination of the communist organisation and armed forces in Malaya' (the Briggs Plan): report by COS for Cabinet Malaya Committee. (CAB 21/1681, MAL C(50)23, Appendix). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) Cabinet Office, U. K. (1951). [Briggs plan]: Cabinet Office summary of a meeting at 10 Downing Street on 26 Feb called by Mr. Attlee to consider the plan's slow progress. (PREM 8/1406/2, GEN 345/5). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) CJA. (1946). Telegram to the Right Honourable Mr. Creech Jones, Secretary of State for the Colonies, from the Council of Joint Action, Singapore, 16th December, 1946. In C. L. Tan (Ed.), Malayan Problems: From a Chinese Point of View (pp. 165–166). Tannsco. Colonial Office, U. K. (1949). 'Political developments in Malaya': CO brief for Mr. Ress-Williams for his tour of Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaya, Oct-Nov 1949; communalism and nation-building. (CO 967/84, no 70). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) Colonial Office, U. K. (1956a). [Constitutional commission and the Alliance submission]: transcirpt of hearing [Extract]. (CO 889/6, ff 281-290). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) Colonial Office, U. K. (1956b). 'Federation of Malaya constitutional commission: hearing of the Alliance Party': summary record (no CC 2167) of the hearing in Kuala Lumpur on 27 Sept. (CO 889/6, ff 241-247). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) Colonial Office, U. K. (1956c). Report by the Federation of Malaya Constitutional Conference held in London in January and Febuary, 1956 London Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HMSO) Constitutional Commission, F. o. M. (1957). Report of The Federation of Malaya Constitutional Commission 1957. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HMSO) Constitutional Proposals for Malaya. (1946). Kuala Lumpur: Malayan Union Government Press Constitutional Proposals for Malaya: Report of the Consultative Committee. (1947). Kuala Lumpur: Malayan Union Government Press Cranborne. (1942a). ‘Record of a discussion which the S of S had with Dr Van Mook,‘ Dutch colonial minister at the Colonial Office on the 12th June’: minute by Lord Cranborne on post-war colonial restoration. (CO 825/35/4, no 15). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) Cranborne. (1942b). ‘Record of conversation between the secretary of state and the Chinese ambassador at the Colonial Office on Wednesday, 30 September, 1942’: minute by Lord Cranborne. (CO 825/35/4, no 61). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) Creech Jones, A. (1946). 'Malayan policy': memorandum by Mr. Creech Jones for Cabinet Colonial Affairs Committee (C(46)6). (CO 537/1543, no 109). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) Creech Jones, A. (1947). 'Malayan policy': Cabinet memorandum by Mr. Creech Jones. Annex: citizenship proposals. (CAB 129/19, CP(47)187). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) Department of Information, F. o. M. (1952). Communist Terrorism in Malaya: The Emergency, with a Chronology of Important Events, June 1948-June 1952. Department of Information, Federation of Malaya. Federation of Malaya (Amendment) Ordinance, 1952, Federation of Malaya (1952). The Federation of Malaya Agreement, 1948, Great Britain (1948). Federation of Malaya, F. o. M. (1952). Report of Select Committee appointed on the 11th day of July, 1951, to examine and report to the Legislative Council on the Bill, the short title of which is The Federation of Malaya Agreement (Amendment) Ordinance, 1951. . Kuala Lumpur: Government Press Federation of Malaya: Summary of Revised Constitutional Proposals (Cmd. 7171). (1947). London: His Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) Federation of Malayan Annual Report 1957. (1958). Kuala Lumpur: Government Press 'Federation proposals': minute 7 of the 5th governor-general's conference in Penang about the consultative process. (CO 537/2165, ff 19-21). (1947). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) Gent, E. (1943). ‘Constitutional reconstruction in the Far East: Malaya, North Borneo and Sarawak’: revised memorandum by G E J Gent. (CO 825/35/6, no 5). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) Gent, E. (1946a). [Anglo-Malay consitutional negotiations]: letter from Sir E. Gent to Sir G. Gater. (CO 537/1530, no 303). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) Gent, E. (1946b). 'Citizenship': inward telegram no 855 from Sir E. Gent to Mr. Hall. (CO 537/1542, no 94). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) Gent, E. (1946c). [Sultans' constitutional proposals]: inward telegram (reply) no 268 from Sir E. Gent to Mr. Hall advocating a federal system as a means to achieve closer unity. (CO 537/1529, no 101). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) Gent, E. (1947a). [Chinese demand for constitutional review]: inward telegram no 1185 from Sir E. Gent to Sir T. Lloyd. (CO 537/2144, no 267). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) Gent, E. (1947b). [Federation proposals]: despatch no 119 from Sir E. Gent to Mr. Creech Jones (CO 537/2142, no 103). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) Griffiths, J. (1950). 'Political and economic background to the situation in Malaya': memorandum by Mr. Griffiths for Cabinet Defence Committee. (PREM 8/1406/2, DO(50)94). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) Gurney, H. (1948a). [Enlisting Chinese support]: letter from Sir H. Gurney to Sir T. Lloyd on the problems and methods of winnning Chinese support. (CO 537/3758, no 25). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) Gurney, H. (1948b). [Squatters]: inward telegram no 1326 from Sir H. Gurney to Mr. Creech Jones on measures to deal with alien Chinese squatters. (CO 717/167/53849/2/1948, ff 108-110). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) Gurney, H. (1949a). [Communalism and nation-building]: letter from Sir H. Gurney to J. J. Paskin assessing the likelihood of the political integration of Malays and Chinese. (CO 967/84, no 70). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) Gurney, H. (1949b). [Tan Cheng Lock]: letter from Sir H. Gureny to J. J. Paskin. (CO 437/4761, no 14). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) Gurney, H. (1950). [Constitutional development]: despatch no 6 from Sir H. Gurney to Mr. Griffiths proposing a member system. (CO 537/6026, no 10). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) Gurney, H. (1951). [Gurney's 'political will']: a note by Sir H. Gurney expressing his frustration with the Chinese community. (CO 1022/148, no 10). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) Hailey. (1943). [Constitutional reconstruction]: memorandum by Lord Hailey on the CO proposals. (CO 825/35/6, no 3A). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) Hall, G. H. (1946a). [Citizenship]: outward telegram (reply) no 1327 from Mr. Hall to Sir E. Gent. (CO 537/1542, nos 95/96). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) Hall, G. H. (1946b). 'Malayan policy': Cabinet memorandum by Mr Hall. (CAB 129/7, CP(46)81). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) Hone, H. R. (1943). ‘Post-war constitutional arrangements for the mainland of Malaya’: memorandum by Major-General H R Hone. (CO 825/35/6, no 14). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) Lennox-Boyd, A. (1957). 'Report of the constitutional commission for Malaya': memorandum by Mr. Lennox-Boyd for the Cabinet Colonial Policy Committee. (CAB 134/1555. CPC(57)11). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) Lloyd, T. (1948). [Disorders and ways of enlisting Chinese support]: letter from Sir T. Lloyd to Sir F. Gimson and Sir A. Newboult. (CO 537/3758, nos 16/18). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) Lyttelton, O. (1951). 'Malaya': Cabinet memorandum by Mr. Lyttelton. Appendices I-XV. (CAB 129/48, C(51)59). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) MacDonald, M. J. (1947). [Chinese demand for constitutional review]: inward telegram no 367 from Mr. M. J. MacDonald to Mr. Creech Jones. (CO 537/2144, no 264). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) MacDonald, M. J. (1948a). [Dato Onn, Sir Edward Gent and the workings of the federal government]: personal letter from Mr. M. J. MacDonald to Mr. Creech Jones about Onn's mistrust of the late Sir Edward Gent and his threatened resignation. (CO 537/3756, no 1). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) MacDonald, M. J. (1948b). [Replacement of Sir E. Gent]: unnumbered telegram from Mr. M. J. MacDonald to Mr. Creech Jones. (CO 537/3686, no 6). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) MacGillivray, D. (1953). [Training Malayan politicians]: letter from Sir D. MacGillivray to Sir T. Llyod suggesting the extension of the member system and the appointment of a working committee to examine the question of federal elections. (CO 1022/86, no 5). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) MacGillivray, D. (1955). [Federal elections]: despatch no 958/55 from Sir D. MacGillivray to Mr. Lennox-Boyd reporting the conduct and results of the elections to the Legislative Council. (CO 1030/225, no 4). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) Malayan Press comment on the White Paper on Malayan Union. (n.d.). (CO 537/1536 no. 50823/6/4). Malayan Union and Singapore: Statement of Policy on Future Constitution, (1946). Newboult, A. T. (1945). 'Political position in Malaya with regard to the new policy proposals': memorandum bu Brigadier A T Newsboult. (CO 273/675/18 no 20). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) Newboult, A. T. (1946). Reply from the Chief Secretary, Malayan Union, July 25th, 1946. In C. L. Tan (Ed.), Malayan Problems: From a Chinese Point of View (pp. 164–165). Tannsco. Newboult, A. T. (1948). [Recall of Sir E. Gent]: inward telegram no 733 from Sir A. Newboult (OAG) to Mr. Creech Jones giving the text of a message from Tan Cheng Lock in protest against Gent's recall. (CO 537/3686, no 23). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) Nottebohm Case (second phase), Judgement of April 6th, 1955 I.C.J. Reports 1955, p. 4. PUTERA-AMCJA. (1947). The People's Constitutional Proposals for Malaya. (CO 537/2148). London Selangor Nationality Enactment 1952, Selangor State Legislative Assembly (1952). https://dewan.selangor.gov.my/semua-seksyen/?enakmen_id=29327 Stanley, O. (1944). ‘Future constitutional policy for British colonial territories in South-East Asia’: memorandum by Mr Stanley for War Cabinet Committee on Malaya and Borneo. (CAB 98/41, CMB (44)3). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HSMO) Vlieland, C. A. (1931). British Malaya: A Report on the 1931 Census and on Certain Problems of Vital Statistics. Office of the Crown Agents for the Colonies. Wilson, S. (1933). Report of Brigadier-General Sir Samuel Wilson Permanent Under-Secretary of State for the Colonies on his visit to Malaya 1932. H. M. S. Office. Online and Media Sources 1,800 Rush for Re-entry Visas. (1950, 5 October). The Straits Times, 1. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19501005-1.2.18 'Alliance' May Now Spread. (1952, 18 February). The Straits Times, 1. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19520218-1.2.2 Alliance 'not good'—so the Indians will stay out. (1952, 27 February). The Straits Times, 4. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19520227-1.2.57 Alliance book of faith—Chapter One: Road to freedom. (1955, 19 May). The Straits Times, 4. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19550519-1.2.60 Alliance Boycott Off. (1954, 8 July). The Straits Times, 1. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19540708-1.2.2 Alliance Controls 70 Votes. (1955, 30 July). The Straits Times, 1. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19550730-1.2.14 The alien danger: Alliance warns. (1955, 25 May). The Straits Times, 4. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19550525-1.2.61 Bernama. (2024). GOVERNMENT TO CONTINUE UPHOLDING FEDERAL CONSTITUTION INCLUDING ARTICLE 153 – PM ANWAR. Bernama. https://www.pmo.gov.my/2024/02/government-to-continue-upholding-federal-constitution-including-article-153-pm-anwar/ Chinese Plans for Malayan Federation. (1947, 10 April). The Straits Budget, 9. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitsbudget19470410-1.2.45 Chinese plead for racial equality. (1957, 25 April). The Straits Budget, 14. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitsbudget19570425-1.2.86 Chinese want back ‘lost birthright’. (1956, 28 June). The Straits Budget, 17. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitsbudget19560628-1.2.129 Col. Lee Defends MCA-UMNO Electoral Alliance. (1952, 27 January). Indian Daily Mail, 4. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/indiandailymail19520127-1.2.38 Dato Yahaya, Lee Defend Alliance. (1952, 17 January). Singapore Standard, 4. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/singstandard19520117-1.2.66 The Colonial Melting Pot. (1942, March 7). The Economist. https://archive.org/details/sim_economist_1942-03-07_142_5141/page/310/mode/2up Federal Elections Committee: A full report. (1954, 1 February). The Straits Times, 2. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19540201-1.2.27 Fernando, J. M. (2007, June 18). The rebel in Onn Jaafar. The Star. https://www.malaysianbar.org.my/article/news/legal-and-general-news/general-news/the-rebel-in-onn-Jaafar FMT. (2024). Throw out ‘Malaysian Malaysia’ concept to improve ties with Umno, DAP told. Free Malaysia Today. https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2024/05/29/throw-out-malaysian-malaysia-concept-to-improve-ties-with-umno-dap-told/ Franchise. (1946, 26 January ). Malaya Tribune, 2. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/maltribune19460126-1.2.23 Go slow on jus soli—chamber. (1956, 3 May). The Straits Budget, 5. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitsbudget19560503-1.2.9 Hartal by Penang Chinese. (1947). The Straits Times, 5. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19470917-1.2.48 'I shall consult the leaders of the majority'. (1954, 8 July). The Straits Times, 1. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19540708-1.2.3 Independence by 1960. (1955, 23 January). Singaopre Standard, 1. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/singstandard19550123-1.2.14 Jus soli plea to world court. (1956, 27 August). The Straits Times, 7. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19560827-1.2.103 Jus soli: M.C.A. has 'a plan of action'. (1956). The Straits Times, 9. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19560420-1.2.134 Jus soli: No decision. (1956, 11 April). The Straits Times, 1. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19560411-1.2.2 Lee Issues Challenge. (1952, 26 January). Singapore Standard, 4. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/singstandard19520126-1.2.47 Lee Tells Of Plan To Extend Accord To Other States. (1952, 18 February). Singapore Standard, 1. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/singstandard19520218-1.2.11 MCA-UMNO clean sweep in the Federation. (1952, 7 December). The Straits Times, 1. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19521207-1.2.15 MIC Joins the Alliance. (1954, 18 October). Singapore Standard, 1. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/singstandard19541018-1.2.10 Malacca Hartal Today. (1947, 9 September). The Straits Times, 2. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19470909-1.2.16 'Malay Only' Demand by UMNO Party. (1956, 3 April). The Straits Times, 1. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19560403-1.2.18 Malayan Indian Congress Suspends Political Activity. (1948, 26 July). Morning Tribune, 1. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/morningtribune19480726-1.2.9 Malays and the Union. (1946, 16 April). The Straits Times, 2. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19460416-1.2.17.1 Malaysiakini. (2020, December 18). Mothers file constitutional challenge to grant their children citizenship. Malaysiakini. https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/555770 Mr. Opposition. (1955, 30 July). The Straits Times, 7. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19550730-1.2.102 New Party Aims to Govern United Malaya. (1954, 1 March). The Straits Times, 1. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19540301-1.2.24 Next Step to Merdeka. (1956, 15 March). The Straits Budget, 14. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitsbudget19560315-1.2.40 OCHCR. (2021, September 5). Malaysia: UN experts denounce gender-discriminatory citizenship law https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2022/09/malaysia-un-experts-denounce-gender-discriminatory-citizenship-law Onn's citizenship bogey—It's sheer bosh, says the MCA's Mirror. (1955, 6 April). The Straits Times, 5. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19550406-1.2.86 Opposition Expected at UMNO Talks. (1950, 17 May). The Straits Times, 1. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19500517-1.2.2 Passport Ruling Hits Chinese. (1949, 1 August). The Straits Times, 5. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19490801-1.2.63 The People to Elect 52 and Goverment Will Nominate 46. (1954, 28 April). Singapore Standard, 1. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/singstandard19540428-1.2.3 Ramani, R. (1954a, 29 July). Indian representation in the new Federal Council. The Straits Times, 6. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19540729-1.2.99 Ramani, R. (1954b, 30 July). Special seats for Indians in new Federal Council. The Straits Times, 6. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19540730-1.2.108 Reaction to Reforms. (1946, 24 January). Malaya Tribune, 2. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/maltribune19460124-1.2.27 Reid forgot the Malays - Rahman. (1957, 18 March). The Straits Times, 7. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19570318-1.2.92 Reid Pleases Majority. (1957, 22 February). The Straits Times, 1. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19570222-1.2.2 The Reid Report. (1957). The Straits Times, 8. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19570221-1.2.57 Rulers Raise Snag Over Nationality. (1956, 15 March). The Straits Times, 2. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19560315-1.2.24 Second Look At Reid. (1957). The Straits Times, 8. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19570313-1.2.113 'Send Mission to China'. (1956, 15 March). The Straits Times, 1. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19560315-1.2.2 Soo, W. J. (2023). Examining the ‘Malayness’ of the Constitution: Is a multi-ethnic Malaysia unconstitutional? Malay Mail. https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2023/07/14/examining-the-malayness-of-the-constitution-is-a-multi-ethnic-malaysia-unconstitutional/78473 Stirring Appeal for Unity among Malays. (1946, 4 March). The Straits Times, 3. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19460304-1.2.27 Strong Malay Opposition. (1950, 13 May). The Straits Times, 9. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19500513-1.2.128 Sultan's Protest. (1946, 8 February). Malaya Tribune, 2. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/maltribune19460208-1.2.21 Sultans Pledge Support To Our Commander. (1942, 13 April). Shonan Times, 4. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/syonantimes19420413-1.2.17 Tengku breaks silence. (1956, 23 April). The Straits Times, 1. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19560423-1.2.25 Tengku Calls for Harmony of All Races. (1956, 2 April). The Straits Times, 1. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19560402-1.2.6 This is NOT way to win loyalty of the people, says 'rebel' Yong. (1957, 11 July). The Straits Times, 8. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19570711-1.2.83 UMNO and MCA agree on Question of Federal Polls. (1953, 17 March). The Straits Times, 4. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19530317-1.2.69 UMNO and MCA to Fight Elections Together. (1952, 9 January). The Straits Times, 5. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19520109-1.2.65 UMNO and MCA Win, IMP Beaten at the Polls. (1952, 17 February). The Straits Times, 1. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19520217-1.2.2 An Unholy Alliance. (1952, 10 January). Indian Daily Mail, 2. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/indiandailymail19520110-1.2.16 United Malays Oppose Union. (1946, 6 March). Malaya Tribune, 2. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/maltribune19460306-1.2.40 'Vital' Sino-Malay Decisions. (1953, 25 February). The Straits Times, 1. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/straitstimes19530225-1.2.2 Reports Aguilar, F. V. (2017). Report on Citizenship Law: Philippines (RSCAS/GLOBALCIT-Comp. 2017/1, Issue. Low, C. C. (2017). Report on Citizenship Law: Malaysia and Singapore (RSCAS/GLOBALCIT-Comp. 2017/13, Issue. Nguyen, L. (2017). Report on Citizenship Law: Vietnam (RSCAS/GLOBALCIT-Comp. 2017/13, Issue. Sperfeldt, C. (2017). Report on Citizenship Law: Cambodia (RSCAS/GLOBALCIT-Comp. 2017/2, Issue. Vonk, O. (2017). Comparative Report: Citizenship in Asia (RSCAS/GLOBALCIT-Comp. 2017/4, Issue. Chinese references 崔貴強（2007）。《新馬華人國家認同的轉向（修訂卷）》。新加坡：新加坡青年書局。Choi, K. K. (2007). Xin Ma Huaren guojia rentong de zhuanxiang (xiuding juan) [The shift in national identity among Chinese in Singapore and Malaysia (revised edition)]. Singapore: Singapore Youth Book Co. 邱家金（2009）。〈馬來亞的形成〉。收錄於文平強（編），《馬來西亞華人與國族建構：從獨立前到獨立後五十年（上冊）》（頁113–133）。Khoo, K. K. (2009). Malaiya de xingcheng [The formation of Malaya]. In P. C. Wen (Ed.), Malaixiya Huaren yu guozu jiangou: Cong duli qian dao duli hou wushi nian (shang ce) [Malaysian Chinese and nation-building: From pre-independence to 50 years after independence (Vol. 1)] (pp. 113–133). Kuala Lumpur: Centre for Malaysian Chinese Studies. 南洋商報。（1947年1月11日a）。〈馬來亞政制問題馬共發表聲明認為分割馬來民族阻礙發展 提三原則成立自治政府享平等公民權〉。南洋商報。 [Nanyang Siang Pau. (1947a, January 11). Malayan political system issue: The Malayan Communist Party issued a statement, believing that the division of the Malay nation would hinder development, and proposed three principles for establishing an autonomous government and equal citizenship rights.] https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/nysp19470111-1.2.91 南洋商報。（1947年3月24日b）。〈馬憲建議書乃排華偏見之表現 梹三華僑團體呈英京殖民大臣抗議〉。南洋商報。 [Nanyang Siang Pau. (1947b, March 24). The Malayan Constitutional Proposal was a manifestation of anti-Chinese prejudice. The Chinese community in Penang lodged a protest with the British Colonial Secretary.] https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/nysp19470324-1.2.109 南洋商報。（1947年3月27日c）。〈柔中華總會再進一步發表馬憲意見四要點〉。南洋商報。[Nanyang Siang Pau. (1947c, March 27). The Johore Chinese Association further expressed its four main opinions on the Malayan constitution.] https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/nysp19470327-1.2.109 南洋商報。（1952年2月19日）。〈陳禎祿及唐姑阿都拉曼電賀華巫聯合機構 李孝式望擴大華巫團結〉。南洋商報。 [Nanyang Siang Pau. (1952, February 19). Tan Cheng Lock and Tunku Abdul Rahman congratulate the Chinese-Malay Joint Organization, Lee Hau Shik hopes to expand Chinese-Malay unity.] https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/nysp19470327-1.2.109 曾心影。（1947年1月19日）。〈馬來亞憲法草案批評與建議——華僑佔人口半數應爭取當然公民權利〉。南洋商報。 [Zeng, X. Y. (1947, January 19). Criticism and suggestions on the draft Malayan Constitution: Overseas Chinese, who made up half of the population, should fight for their own citizenship right.] https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/article/nysp19470119-1.2.3.1 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/99293 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本論文以歷史制度主義為理論視角，探討1931年至1957年間馬來亞（今馬來西亞）公民權法律的演變，強調早期制度選擇與政治協商如何構築出具備持續性與路徑依賴性的公民身分制度。研究旨在回答兩個核心問題：（1）1946至1957年間有哪些歷史因素深刻影響馬來亞的公民法律發展？（2）這些因素又如何形塑最終於1957年誕生的《聯邦憲法》？
本研究聚焦三項關鍵影響因素：英國的去殖民策略、馬來亞各族政治菁英之間的協商，以及馬來亞緊急狀態所帶來的衝擊，並指出1956至1957年間的憲法談判是一個關鍵轉捩點。在此時期，英國殖民當局為確保順利移交政權，選擇與本地菁英合作，並鞏固社群政治架構，使殖民退場成為一場有管理的制度工程。此一安排最終促成非馬來人基於屬地主義（jus soli）獲得公民資格，並同時將馬來人特殊地位寫入憲法第153條，制度化其優勢地位。 本論文主張，1957年的憲政體系並非從零開始，而是在長期英殖統治所遺留下的制度基礎上層層堆疊而成。殖民時期透過法律多元制度與族群分離的行政與教育系統，早已為「族群差異化公民權」奠定基礎。從1946年馬來亞聯合方案的提出與失敗，到1948年馬來亞聯邦的成立，馬來人政治主導權的保障一步步地被制度化。 另外，1948年爆發的馬來亞共產主義危機是促使殖民政府和本土菁英加快公民權改革的主要動力，以吸納被視為潛在叛亂分子的華人群體。當時的公民政策具有高度戰略性，意圖以擴大政治參與換取忠誠，但其出發點並非建立平等理念，而是出於政治與安全考量。 在此期間，馬來民族統一機構（UMNO）、馬華公會（MCA）與印度國大黨（MIC）之間的協商也在憲法設計中扮演關鍵角色。這些協商一方面回應馬來族群的民族主義訴求，另一方面也為非馬來族群爭取平等政治與公民權利。最終，政治菁英同意透過屬地主義原則給予非馬來人公民身份，但條件是非馬來人必須接受馬來人在公職、語言與宗教上的優勢地位，形成後來所稱的「社會契約」。此協議進一步鞏固馬來西亞以族群為界線的公民權利，使馬來族群享有更多保障，而其他族群則面對制度性的劣勢。 本研究的貢獻在於揭示殖民遺緒、菁英協商與危機政治如何交織出馬來西亞具有路徑依賴特徵的公民權制度，並指出這些關鍵時期所形成的制度安排，如何透過政策回饋與社會適應而延續至今，影響當代政治局勢、族群關係與平等與國族認同的論辯。此一發現對於理解多元族群、後殖民社會中公民制度的建構與持續，具有跨國比較的理論意涵。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This thesis investigates the evolution of Malaysia’s citizenship laws from 1931 to 1957 through the lens of historical institutionalism, emphasizing how early institutional decisions and political bargains produced enduring and path-dependent frameworks of citizenship. It seeks to answer two key research questions: (1) What historical factors shaped Malaya’s citizenship legislation between 1946 and 1957? (2) How did these forces influence the constitutional negotiations that culminated in the 1957 Federal Constitution?
Focusing on three major independent variables—British decolonization strategy, elite negotiations among Malayan political actors, and the impact of the Malayan Emergency—this study identifies the 1956–1957 constitutional negotiations as a critical juncture. During this period, British officials, under pressure to ensure a smooth postcolonial transition, institutionalized a managed retreat by co-opting local elites and reinforcing communal structures. These arrangements culminated in the formalization of jus soli principles for non-Malays, alongside entrenched provisions for Malay special privileges—most notably codified in Article 153 of the Federal Constitution. The thesis argues that the 1957 constitutional framework did not emerge in isolation but was shaped by layered institutional legacies dating back to British colonial governance. British colonial administrators had long fostered communal divisions through legal pluralism and separate educational and administrative systems, which laid the groundwork for an ethnically differentiated model of citizenship. These legacies were further institutionalized during the Malayan Union proposal of 1946, its subsequent failure, and the formation of the Federation of Malaya in 1948, where concessions were made to preserve Malay political primacy. The Malayan Emergency in 1948 further accelerated this dynamic by pressuring both colonial authorities and local elites to broaden political inclusion as a counterinsurgency measure. Citizenship became a strategic tool to secure loyalty among the Chinese population, many of whom were suspected of communist sympathies. This inclusion, however, was tactical rather than ideological, reinforcing the pragmatic and communal basis of citizenship design. Throughout the time, elite bargaining among UMNO, MCA, and MIC played a decisive role in shaping the final constitutional compromise. These negotiations balanced Malay ethno-nationalist demands with non-Malay aspirations for equal political and civil rights. As a result, citizenship was granted to non-Malays based on the jus soli principle, but in exchange for acceptance of Malay privileges in the public sector, language, and religion—creating what would later be known as Malaysia’s “social contract”. This settlement institutionalized a form of “ethnically differentiated citizenship,” in which the majority Malays enjoyed affirmative protections, while minorities faced structural disadvantages. Ultimately, this study contributes to scholarship on postcolonial state-building by demonstrating how colonial legacies, elite bargaining, and emergency converged to produce a path-dependent model of citizenship in Malaysia. It highlights how institutional arrangements formed during critical junctures can persist through policy feedback and societal adaptation, shaping contemporary political dynamics, interethnic relations, and debates over equality and national identity. The findings offer broader relevance for understanding citizenship regimes in multiethnic, postcolonial societies grappling with historical divisions and institutional inertia. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-08-21T17:09:27Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-08-21T17:09:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Acknowledgement i
Abstract ii 摘要 iv Table of Contents vi List of Abbreviation x List of Figures xi List of Tables xii Chapter 1: Introduction 1 1.1 Problem Statement 1 1.2 Research Questions and Assumptions 5 1.3 Significance of Study 7 1.4 Research Method and Research Design 8 Chapter 2: Literature Review 15 2.1 The Development of Nationality Laws 15 2.2 Colonialism, Migration and Citizenship Issues in Asia 22 2.3 Existing Studies about Malaysia’s Citizenship Legislation and Research Gaps 26 2.4 The Development of Historical Institutionalism 30 Chapter 3: Malaya’s Historical Background (1931-1946) 38 3.1 Brief History of Malaya before 1931 38 3.1.1 Developments before British Colonial Rule 38 3.1.2 Formation of British Malaya 41 3.1.3 Status of Residents in Straits Settlements, FMS and UMS before 1946 44 3.2 The Changes of Malaya’s Demographics in 1931 47 3.3 The Japanese Occupation and the 1946 Malayan Union Scheme 51 3.3.1 Japanese Occupation of Malaya (1942-1945) 51 3.1.2 British Post-War Planning for Malaya 53 3.3.3 Formation of Malayan Union in 1946 58 3.4 Summary 60 Chapter 4: Factors Influencing the Evolution of Malaya’s Citizenship Laws (1946-1955) 64 4.1 British Decolonization Strategy 64 4.1.1 Malay Opposition and Chinese’s Fragmented Voice 65 4.1.2 British Retreat to Pro-Malay Policy in 1946-1948 67 4.1.3 Communist Insurgency and Decolonization from 1949 onwards 72 4.2 Malayan Elites Negotiations 75 4.2.1 British-Malay Negotiations in 1946-1948 76 4.2.2 Malay-Chinese Negotiations in 1949-1951 87 4.2.3 Successful Collaboration of Alliance Party in 1952-1955 Elections 95 4.3 The Malayan Emergency 107 4.3.1 Declaration of Emergency in 1948 107 4.3.2 Counterinsurgency and Desinicization in 1948-1952 110 4.3.3 China’s Political Developments and Its Impacts 117 4.4 Summary 122 Chapter 5: Formation of the Malaya Constitution in 1957 125 5.1 Road to Independence (1956-1957) 125 5.1.1 Alliance’s Internal Bargaining about Constitution Proposals 126 5.1.2 The Reid Commission and British-Alliance Negotiations 130 5.1.3 The 1957 London Constitutional Conference 135 5.2 The Malaya Constitution in 1957 137 5.3 Merdeka Consensus and Its Long-lasting Impacts 142 5.3.1 The 1969 Riots and the New Economic Policy (NEP) 143 5.3.2 The Social Contract 145 5.3.3 Contradictions of Malay Privileges and the Principle of Equality 147 5.4 Summary 150 Chapter 6: Conclusion 153 6.1 Path Dependence and Institutional Sequencing 153 6.2 From Colonial Legacies to Communal Bargaining 154 6.3 Chinese Community and Institutional Interplay 156 6.4 Limitations and Future Research 157 References 159 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject | 公民權法律 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 馬來西亞 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 殖民遺緒 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 歷史制度主義 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 菁英協商 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Elite Bargaining | en |
| dc.subject | Colonial Legacies | en |
| dc.subject | Historical Institutionalism | en |
| dc.subject | Citizenship Laws | en |
| dc.subject | Malaysia | en |
| dc.title | 1931年至1957年馬來西亞公民權法律演變：以歷史制度主義為視角 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Evolution of Malaysia’s Citizenship Laws from 1931 to 1957: A Historical Institutionalism Perspective | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 許耀明;孫采薇 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Yao-Ming Hsu;Tsai-Wei Sun | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 馬來西亞,公民權法律,歷史制度主義,殖民遺緒,菁英協商, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Malaysia,Citizenship Laws,Historical Institutionalism,Colonial Legacies,Elite Bargaining, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 190 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202503355 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-08-08 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2025-08-22 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 政治學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf | 1.63 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。