請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/99156完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 郭銘峰 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Ming-Feng Kuo | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 魏彤恩 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Tong-En Wei | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-08-21T16:36:31Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-08-22 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-08-21 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-08-06 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 壹、 中文部分
王梅玲，2002，＜焦點團體研究法的理論與應用＞，《圖書與資訊學刊》，40，29–46。 王清煌、洪珮嫺、陳欣媺、劉宥縈、蔡孟軒、張慧婷、王文仁、陳鳳雀，2021，＜臺灣民眾的環保意識與行動力＞，《國立臺灣科技大學人文社會學報》， 17（4），339–360。 史麗珠、林莉華，2004，《統計學》，臺北：學富文化。 交通部觀光署，2024，＜2023年臺灣旅遊狀況調查報告＞。 行政院環境保護署，2022，＜推動淨零綠生活與落實公民參與＞，台灣經濟論衡。 行政院環境保護署，2023，＜臺灣2050淨零轉型「淨零綠生活」關鍵戰略行動計畫核定本＞，行政院國家永續發展委員會。 宋秉明，2000，＜永續觀光發展的原則與方向＞，《觀光研究學報》，6（2），1–14。 李玉鳳，2018，《新制國民旅遊卡的消費行為、認知及滿意度之研究—以雲林縣公務人員為例》，雲林：國立虎尾科技大學碩士論文。 李素馨，1996，＜觀光新紀元－永續發展的選擇＞，《戶外遊憩研究》，9（4），1–17。 杜素豪、瞿海源、張苙雲（2012）。＜抽樣問卷調查＞，收錄於瞿海源、畢恆達、劉長萱、楊國樞編，《社會及行為科學研究法：總論與量化研究（I）》，199–234。台北：東華書局。 肖潤琦，2024，《從意圖到行為：「輕推」能幫助民眾更好實施垃圾分類嗎? 以中國大陸北京市社區為例》，臺北：國立臺灣大學碩士學位論文。 林秀雲，2021，《社會科學研究方法》，臺北：雙葉書廊。 林佩瑩，2012，《公務人員使用國民旅遊卡認知與滿意度之研究-以行政院及所屬公務人員為例》，臺中：東海大學碩士學位論文。 邱浩政，2018，《量化研究方法一：研究設計與資料分析》，臺北：雙葉書廊。 徐德宇，2018，＜國民旅遊卡政策執行成效與檢討＞，國家發展委員會。 高博銓，2002，＜教育研究法—焦點團體訪談法＞．《教育研究月刊》103，101–110。 張志維、戴介三、王義善、劉興榮，2017，＜有機村居民與遊客對於綠色旅遊認知之研究＞，《花蓮區農業改良場研究彙報》，35，75–88。 張美惠譯，2014，《推出你的影響力：每個人可以影響別人、改善決策，做人生的選擇設計師》，臺北：時報文化。 許惠玲，2022，《國民旅遊卡政策變遷：以多元流程模式分析》，臺北：國立政治大學碩士學位論文。 許藝齡，2011，《公務人員使用國民旅遊卡從事旅遊行為之研究-心理帳戶觀點之應用》，高雄：國立高雄餐旅大學碩士學位論文。 郭銘峰、賴怡樺、吳舜文，2023，《輕推理論運用於淨零「生活轉型」面向之政策研析》，行政院環境部氣候變遷署。 陳明梨，2020，輕輕一推，大大不同：《推出你的影響力》讀後感。《T&D 飛訊》，273，1–15。 陳政宏，2020，《國民旅遊卡政策執行過程與執行成效之研究（2003-2018）》，臺北：國立臺灣大學碩士學位論文。 銓敘部，2025，《113年第4季全國公務人員人力概況》，1–2。 賴怡樺，2021，《行為經濟學觀點的政策分析與工具設計-以我國文憑主義為個案之研究》，臺北：國立政治大學博士論文。 賴怡樺、林水波、陳敦源，2018，＜行為主義導向的公共政策研究：以政策工具「推力」為核心初探＞，《行政既政策學報》，67，1–37。 蘇貞如，2011，《公務人員國民旅遊卡及現金之消費行為研究－心理帳戶觀點之應用》，高雄：高雄應用科技大學。 貳、英文部分 Ahn, S.Y., & Nam, Y. (2022). Does mobile payment use lead to overspending? The moderating role of financial knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior, 134, 107319. Andrew, M. (2015). Does education increase pro-environmental behavior? Evidence from Europe. Ecological Economics, 108, 108–121. Aslisoy, B., & Oktay, D. (2018). Exploring environmental behaviour as the major determinant of ecological citizenship. Sustainable Cities and Society, 39, 766–771. Astin, A. W. (1991). The changing American college student: Implications for educational policy and practice. Higher Education, 22(2), 129-143. Bali, A. S., Howlett, M., Lewis, J. M., & Ramesh, M. (2021). Procedural policy tools in theory and practice. Policy and Society, 40(3), 295–311. Beblo, M., Beninger, D., & Markowsky, E. (2017). It’s education, not gender: A research note on the determinants of an anchoring bias in experimental WTA elicitations. Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, 1(2), 51–55. Berthet, V., Teovanović, P., & de Gardelle, V. (2024). A common factor underlying individual differences in confirmation bias. Journal of Cognitive Psychology,1–13. Beshears, J., & Kosowsky, H. (2020). Nudging: Progress to date and future directions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 3–19. Bhargava, S., & Loewenstein, G. (2015). Behavioral economics and public policy 102: Beyond nudging. The American Economic Review, 105(5), 396–401. Bimonte, S. (2006). Sustainable tourism and management tools. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 97, 325–334. Bonander, C., Ekman, M., & Jakobsson, N. (2023). When do default nudges work? Oxford Open Economics, 2, 1–8. Buratto, A., & Lotti, L. (2024). Encouraging sustainable food consumption through nudges: An experiment with menu labels. Ecological Economics, 216, Article 108024. Carli, L. L. (2017). Social influence and gender. In S. G. Harkins, K. D. Williams, & J. M. Burger (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social influence (pp. 33–51). Oxford University Press. Chang, H. S., Huh, C., & Lee, M. J. (2016). Would an Energy Conservation Nudge in Hotels Encourage Hotel Guests to Conserve? Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 57(2), 172–183. Coelho, F., Pereira, M. C., Cruz, L., Simoes, P., & Barata, E. (2017). Affect and the adoption of pro-environmental behavior: A structural model. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 54, 127–138. Cooper, E. J. (2017). To Nudge or Not to Nudge: Promoting Environmentally Beneficial Behaviors. Bard Digital Commons. Cottrell, S. P. (2003). Influence of sociodemographics and environmental attitudes on general responsible environmental behavior among recreational boaters. Environment and Behavior, 35(3), 347–375. Damgaard, M. T., & Nielsen, H. S. (2018). Nudging in education. Economics of Education Review, 64, 313–342. Dietz, T., Stern, P. C., & Guagnano, G. A. (1998). Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 30(4), 450–471. Ding, D., Chen, Y., Lai, J., Chen, X., Han, M., & Zhang, X. ,(2020). Belief bias effect in older adults: Roles of working memory and need for cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2940. Dunlap, R. E., & York, R. (2008). The Globalization of Environmental Concern and the Limits of the Postmaterialist Values Explanation: Evidence from Four Multinational Surveys. The Sociological Quarterly, 49(3), 529–563. Dobson, A. (2007). Environmental citizenship: Towards sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 15(5), 276–285. Fei, A., Kim, J., & Kim, S. I. (2024). Effects of environmental sustainability practice in the economy hotel to Gen Zer’s purchase decision: Behavior economy approach using choice based conjoint analysis. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 118(18), Article 103678. Heimlich, J.E ., & Ardoin, N. M . (2008) . Understanding behavior to understand behavior change: A literature review. Environmental education research, 14 (3) , 215–237. Hörn, D., Kiss, H. J., & Lénárd, T. (2022). Gender differences in preferences of adolescents: Evidence from a large-scale classroom experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 194, 478–522. Hummel, D., & Maedche, A. (2019). How effective is nudging? A quantitative review on the effect sizes and limits of empirical nudging studies. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics,80,47–58. Hungerford, H. R. (1992). Investigating and Evaluating Environment al Issues and Actions : Skill Development Modules.Stipes Publishing. Ibnou-Laaroussi, S., Rjoub, H., & Wong, W.K. (2020). Sustainability of green tourism among international tourists and its influence on the achievement of green environment: Evidence from North Cyprus Sustainability, 12, Article 5698. John, P., Smith, G., & Stoker, G. (2009). Nudge nudge, think think: Two strategies for changing civic behaviour. The Political Quarterly, 80(3), 361–370. Juvan, E., & Dolnicar, S. (2014). The attitude-behaviour gap in sustainable tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 48, 76–95. Kallbekken, S., & Sælen, H. (2013). ‘Nudging’ hotel guests to reduce food waste as a win–win environmental measure. Economics Letters, 119(3), 325–327. Kelly, J.R., & Godbey, G (1992).The sociology of leisue.State College.PA:Venture. Larson, L. R., Stedman, R. C., Cooper, C., & Decker, D. J. (2015). Understanding the multidimensional structure of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 112–124. Leonidou, L. C., Coudounaris, D. N., Kvasova, O., & Christodoulides, P. (2015). Drivers and outcomes of green tourist attitudes and behavior: Sociodemographic moderating effects. Psychology & Marketing, 32(6), 635–650. Liu, P., Ding, M., & Cheng, Y. (2024). Parent-child environmental interaction promotes pro-environmental behaviors through family well-being: An actor-partner interdependence mediation model. Current Psychology ,43(18), 1-13. Li, Z. (2021). The gender psychology of mental accounting financial decision making. Proceedings of the 2021 5th International Conference on Business and Information Management , 62–68. Mansell I, Bennett G, Northway R, Mead D, Moseley L. (2004)The learning curve: the advantages and disadvantages in the use of focus groups as a method of data collection. Nurse Res.11(4), 79-88. Morgan, D. L. (1988). Focus groups as qualitative research. Sage Publications, Inc. Murayama, H., Takagi, Y., Tsuda, H., & Kato, Y. (2023). Applying nudge to public health policy: Practical examples and tips for designing nudge interventions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(5), Article 3962. Ni, X., Wang, D., Chang, J., & Li, H. (2025). Digital nudging for sustainable tourist behavior in new media. Tourism Management, 107, Article 105087. Plotnikova, M. (2018). Green tourism development in smart communities. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 4(3), 203–210. Riggs, W. (2022). Behavioral economics and social nudges in sustainable travel. In Innovations in Transport (pp. 89–110). Edward Elgar Publishing. Sharpe, E. J., Perlaviciute, G., & Steg, L. (2021). Pro-environmental behaviour and support for environmental policy as expressions of pro-environmental motivation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 76, Article 101650. Schneider, A., & Ingram,H.(1990).Behavioral Assumption of Policy tools.The Journal of Politics, 52(2). Shrum, T. R., Platt, N. S., Markowitz, E., & Syropoulos, S. (2023). A scoping review of the green parenthood effect on environmental and climate engagement. WIREs Climate Change, 14(1). Singh, M., & Nandan, T. (2024). Investor Impulsivity and Mental Accounting: A Gender-Centric Investigation. IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review. Skanavis, C., & Sakellari, M. (2008). Gender and sustainable tourism: Women’s participation in the environmental decision-making process. European Journal of Tourism Research, 1(2), 78–93. Skerat, D.E., & Ellison, C.G.(2007).Structing the Religion-Environment Connection: Identifying Religious Influence on Environmental Concern and Activism.Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion,46(1),71–85. Solstrand, M.V., & Gressnes, T. (2014). Marine angling tourist behavior, non-compliance, and implications for natural resource management. Tourism Management, 45, 59–70. Sunstein, C. R. (2014). Why nudge? The politics of libertarian paternalism. Yale University Press. Thaler, R. H. (1985).Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice,Marketing Science,7(1),199–214. Thaler, R. H. (1999)Mental Accounting Matters Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,12(3),183–206 Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press. Thøgersen, J. (2005). How may consumer policy empower consumers for sustainable lifestyles? Journal of Consumer Policy, 28, 143–178. Torn, A., & McNichol, E. (1998). A qualitative study utilizing a focus group to explore the role and concept of the nurse practitioner. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 27(6), 1202–1211. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1039–1061. Van Raaij, W.F.(1981).Economic Psychology,Journal of Economics Psychology,1(1),1–24. Wattanacharoensil, W., & La-ornual, D. (2019). A systematic review of cognitive biases in tourist decisions. Tourism Management, 75, 353–369. Webb, B. (2002). Using focus groups as a research method: A personal experience. Journal of Nursing Management, 10(1), 27–35. Wyss, A. M., Knoch, D., & Berger, S. (2022). When and how pro-environmental attitudes turn into behavior: The role of costs, benefits, and self-control. Journal of environmental Psychology,79,Article101748. Zhao, Z., Gong, Y., Li, Y., Zhang, L., & Sun, Y. (2021). Gender-related beliefs, norms, and the link with green consumption. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 710239. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/99156 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 根據國際能源署（IEA）報告，淨零排放目標中8%的減排來自民眾行為改變，顯示行為干預對淨零目標的關鍵性。 2020年政府推出的「淨零綠生活」政策推廣綠色旅遊，但因僅限宣傳，成效有限。本研究探討輕推政策工具對綠色旅遊意願的影響，同時分析「國民旅遊卡政策」對公務人員所產生之心理偏誤。
本研究於2025年4月24日至5月14日針對臺北市民眾與公務人員進行網路問卷調查，回收242份有效問卷。透過模擬旅遊平台「綠住好行」，設計兩組輕推干預，實驗組一為「社會規範輕推」，強調多數人選擇綠色旅遊；實驗組二為「即時回饋輕推」，提供碳排放即時資訊。結果顯示，「社會規範」與「即時回饋」輕推資訊介入對於提升綠色旅遊意願在中低教育程度者受試者更為有效。針對綠色旅遊部分，民眾將旅遊視為特殊情境，降低環境友善行為意願。加上綠色旅遊推廣受限於訂房平台缺乏綠色選項與資訊透明度不足而導致民眾無從選擇。 基於研究結果，本研究提出以下政策建議。首先為政府應與訂房平台合作，於平台顯著標示即時碳排放資訊，提升民眾對旅遊決策環境影響的認知。再者為優化「淨零綠生活」指引，並整合綠色旅遊資訊於統一平台，增進資訊可近性與普及化。 本研究驗證了輕推理論在綠色旅遊推廣中的適用性，並揭示不同性別與教育程度之影響，為政策制定提供實證基礎。未來研究建議擴大樣本範圍，納入不同區域的民眾，並設計更貼近真實情境的實驗設計。 關鍵詞：行為經濟學、輕推理論、淨零綠生活、綠色旅遊 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | According to a report by the International Energy Agency (IEA), 8% of emissions reductions in the net-zero pathway are expected to come from changes in individual behavior, highlighting the critical role of behavioral interventions in achieving net-zero goals. In 2020, the government introduced the "Net-Zero Green Living" policy to promote green tourism; however, the policy’s effectiveness has been limited due to its sole focus on publicity. This study examines the impact of "nudge" policy tools on individuals’ willingness to engage in green tourism, while also analyzing the psychological biases resulting from the "National Travel Card Policy" among public servants.
An online questionnaire survey was conducted between April 24 and May 14, 2025, targeting both the general public and public servants in Taipei City, yielding 242 valid responses. Using a simulated travel booking platform, "綠住好行," two nudge interventions were designed: Experimental Group 1 received a "social norm nudge," emphasizing that most people choose green travel options; Experimental Group 2 received a "real-time feedback nudge," providing immediate carbon emission information.Results show that both the "social norm" and "real-time feedback" nudge interventions were more effective in increasing participant’s willingness to participate in green tourism among those with lower to medium education levels. The study also found that many individuals perceive tourism as a special occasion, which reduces their willingness to engage in environmentally friendly behavior during travel. In addition, green tourism promotion is hindered by the lack of green options and low transparency of information on booking platforms, leaving consumers with limited choices. Based on the findings, this study proposes several policy recommendations. First, the government should collaborate with booking platforms to prominently display real-time carbon emission information, thereby enhancing public awareness of the environmental impact of travel decisions. Second, the "Net-Zero Green Living" guidelines should be refined, and green tourism information should be consolidated into a unified platform to improve accessibility and public reach. This study confirms the applicability of nudge theory in promoting green tourism and reveals the moderating effects of gender and education level, providing empirical evidence for policy formulation. Future research is encouraged to expand the sample to include individuals from different regions and to design experiments that more closely reflect real-life travel scenarios. Keywords: Behavioral Economics, Nudge Theory, Net-Zero Green Living, Green Tourism | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-08-21T16:36:31Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-08-21T16:36:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝 i
摘要 ii Abstract iii 目次 v 圖次 vii 表次 viii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 2 第三節 研究流程 3 第二章 文獻檢閱與理論回顧 5 第一節 淨零綠生活政策意涵與現況 5 第二節 淨零綠生活綠色旅遊政策工具設計思考邏輯及優劣 8 第三節 民眾及公務人員於政策中產生之心理偏誤 12 第四節 改變大眾行為以利政策推行可能途徑-輕推 16 第三章 研究設計 22 第一節 研究架構與待驗假設 23 第二節 研究方法 25 第三節 虛擬旅遊網站輕推實驗設計 26 第四節 資料處理與分析方法 34 第五節 問卷信效度分析 36 第四章 研究發現與討論 38 第一節 實驗分組與樣本回收情況 38 第二節 全體受試者之綠色意識與行為分析 42 第三節 民眾及公務人員之綠色意識與行為分析 46 第四節 民眾於國民旅遊中產生心理偏誤之原因 49 第五節 輕推介入效果與討論 52 第五章 結論 58 第一節 研究發現 58 第二節 理論與政策意涵 60 第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議 64 參考文獻 66 附錄一：實驗設計問卷 74 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 行為經濟學 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 綠色旅遊 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 淨零綠生活 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 輕推 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Green Tourism | en |
| dc.subject | Behavioral Economics | en |
| dc.subject | Net-Zero Green Living | en |
| dc.subject | Nudge | en |
| dc.title | 如何促進民眾選擇綠色旅遊之意願？—以輕推政策工具的應用為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | How to Facilitate Citizen’s Willingness to Choose Green Tourism? — Application of Nudge Policy Tools | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李仲彬;吳舜文 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chung-Pin Li;Shun-Wen Wu | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 行為經濟學,輕推,淨零綠生活,綠色旅遊, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Behavioral Economics,Nudge,Net-Zero Green Living,Green Tourism, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 83 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202502265 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-08-08 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 公共事務研究所 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2025-08-22 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 公共事務研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用（校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務） | 2.78 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。