請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/99153完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 曹承礎 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Seng-Cho Chou | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 白昱潔 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Barbara Blanc | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-08-21T16:35:53Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-08-22 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-08-21 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-07-23 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002002
Adichie, C. N. (2014). We should all be feminists. Fourth Estate. Ashcraft, K. L. (2009). Reworking gender: A feminist communicology of organization. Sage. Babic, A., & Hansez, I. (2021). The glass ceiling for women managers: Antecedents and consequences for work–family interface and well-being at work. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 618250. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.618250 Banque de France. (2024). The proportion of female business leaders is gradually increasing in France. Author. Becker, G. S. (1962). Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 70(5), 9–49. Bohnet, I. (2016). What works: Gender equality by design. Harvard University Press. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Carli, L. L., & Eagly, A. H. (2017). Leadership and gender. In J. Antonakis & D. Day (Eds.), The nature of leadership (3rd ed., pp. 244–271). Sage. Copé-Zimmermann Law, Loi n° 2011-103 du 27 janvier 2011 relative à la représentation équilibrée des femmes et des hommes au sein des conseils d'administration et de surveillance et à l'égalité professionnelle, Journal officiel de la République française (30 janvier 2011). Deloitte Global Boardroom Program. (2024). Women in the boardroom: A global perspective (8th ed.). Deloitte. Direction Générale du Budget, Accounting and Statistics. (2021). Gender statistics annual bulletin. Executive Yuan (Taiwan). Dorsey, K. D. (2023). From glass ceilings to glass cliffs: A guide to jumping, not falling. MIT Sloan Management Review. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Erlbaum. Eagly, A. H. (2018). The shaping of science by ideology: How feminism inspired, led, and constrained scientific understanding of sex and gender. Journal of Social Issues, 74(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12258 Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Women and the labyrinth of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 85(9), 62–71. Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573 Eagly, A. H., & Koenig, A. M. (2021). The vicious cycle linking stereotypes and social roles. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(4), 343–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214211003119 Ferrary, M. (2024). Census of CAC 40 leadership. SKEMA Business School. Financial Supervisory Commission, R.O.C. (Taiwan). (2024). Corporate governance roadmap 2023–2025. FSC. Fragale, A. (2024). Likeable badass: How women get the success they deserve. Doubleday. Grant Thornton International. (2024). Women in business 2024: The state of gender balance in senior management. GTI. Heilman, M. E., Waller, B., Fuchs, D., & Tamkins, M. (2004). Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3), 416–427. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.416 Hewlett, S. A., Peraino, K., Sherbin, L., & Sumberg, K. (2010). The sponsor effect: Breaking through the last glass ceiling. Center for Work-Life Policy. https://www.wearethecity.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/The-Sponsor-Effect.pdf Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014 Institut Montaigne. (2024). The road to gender equality in France’s labour market. Author. Institute for Women’s Policy Research. (2023). The gender wage gap: 2023 update. IWPR. Intel Corporation. (2022). Corporate responsibility report 2021–2022. https://csrreportbuilder.intel.com/pdfbuilder/pdfs/CSR-2021-22-Full-Report.pdf Investopedia. (n.d.). Glass ceiling. In Investopedia. Retrieved June 18, 2025, from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/g/glass-ceiling.asp Jamieson, K. H. (1995). Beyond the double bind: Women and leadership. Oxford University Press. LeanIn.Org & McKinsey & Company. (2023). Women in the workplace 2023. LeanIn.Org. McKinsey & Company. (2018). Women in the workplace 2018. Author. Mincer, J., & Polachek, S. (1974). Family investments in human capital: Earnings of women. Journal of Political Economy, 82(2), S76–S108. Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(41), 16474–16479. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211286109 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Gender equality at a glance 2023. OECD Publishing. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). Social institutions and gender index 2024: Global report. OECD Publishing. Rixain Law, Loi n° 2021-1774 du 24 décembre 2021 visant à accélérer l’égalité économique et professionnelle, Journal officiel de la République française (26 décembre 2021). Russell Reynolds Associates. (2025). Global corporate governance trends: France. RRA. Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2005). The glass cliff: Evidence that women are over-represented in precarious leadership positions. British Journal of Management, 16(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00433.x Sandberg, S. (2013). Lean in: Women, work, and the will to lead. Knopf. Schein, V. E. (1973). The relationship between sex-role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(2), 95–100. Sczesny, S., Nater, C., & Eagly, A. H. (2019). Agency and communion: Implications for gender stereotypes and identities. In A. Abele & B. Wojciszke (Eds.), Agency and communion in social psychology (pp. 103–116). Routledge. Taipei Times. (2023, March 30). Female board directors a must for listing: FSC. Taipei Times. https://www.taipeitimes.com Taiwan Stock Exchange. (2024). Board diversity dashboard. TWSE Corporate Governance Center. Time Staff. (2024, March 11). Leena Nair explains why women hesitate to chase the corner office. Time Magazine. https://time.com Williams, J. C. (2021). Bias interrupted: Creating inclusion for real and for good. Harvard Business Review Press. Women’s Policy Research. (2023). The status of women in the states 2023. IWPR. World Economic Forum. (2025). Global gender gap report 2025. WEF. 104 Job Bank Co., Ltd. (2024). 2024 DEI workplace white paper [in Chinese]. 104 Job Bank. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/99153 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 性別不平等影響社會的各個層面：從個人福祉到公司業績，再到全球經濟。本論文解釋了為什麼女性在領導階層中的代表性不足，以及為什麼職場性別不平等仍然是一個嚴重的問題，研究內容涵蓋了法國和台灣兩個不同的社會文化背景。本研究將採用質性研究和跨文化比較的方法。訪談採用 Braun & Clarke (2006) 的主題分析法進行。我們的主要發現包括女性在職業生涯中面臨的各種障礙，例如性別刻板印象和領導期望。我們研究了這些障礙如何受到法國和台灣的文化和組織差異的影響。根據所研究的理論和訪談的見解，我們反思如何改進現有的解決方案，以減少職場性別不平等。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Gender inequality has an impact on every level of our society: from individual wellbeing to companies' performance to the global economy. This thesis explains why women in leadership are underrepresented and why gender inequalities in the workplace remain a serious issue, within two different socio-cultural contexts: France and Taiwan. This research will include a qualitative approach and a cross-cultural comparison. Interviews were conducted and analyzed using Braun & Clarke (2006) thematic analysis. Our key findings include the various barriers that women face throughout their careers such as gender stereotypes and leadership expectations. We research how those barriers are influenced by the cultural and organizational differences of France and Taiwan. According to the theories studied and the insights of the interview, we reflect on ways to improve the existing solution in order to reduce gender inequality in the workplace. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-08-21T16:35:53Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-08-21T16:35:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Abstract …………………………………………………………………………………..………ii
中文摘要.......................................iii Table of Contents. …………………………………………………………………………….….iv 1. Problem Statement...............................1 1. Introduction to gender inequality………………………………………………….. ………..1 1.2 Research Problem…………………………………………………………………………..…1 1.3 Research Aims and Objectives………………………………………………………………..1 1.4 Significance of the study …………………………………………………...………………..3 1.5 Scope, delimitations and assumptions……………………………………………………….. 4 1.6 Definition of key terms………………………………………………………………………. 4 2. Literature Review……………………………………………………………………………….6 2.1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………... 6 2.2 Theoretical foundations……………………………………………………………………… 6 2.3 Synthesis of key theories ……………………………………………………………………10 2.5 Cross-cultural perspectives ………………………………………………………………….16 2.6 Conceptual framework figure ……………………………………………………………….18 3. Method………………………………………………………………………………...………20 3.1 Research design approach: Qualitative approach …………………………………………...20 3.2 The interviews: participants …………………………………………………………………21 3.3 Data collection process……………………………………………………………………... 21 3.4 Data analysis methods………………………………………………………………………. 22 3.5 Ethical considerations and limitations ………………………………………………………23 3.6 Comparative analysis ………………………………………………………………………..23 4. Results ………………………………………………………………………………….. ……36 4.1 French women’s perspectives………………………………………………………………. 37 4.2 Taiwanese women’s perspectives …………………………………………………………...43 4.3 Similarities and differences in challenges and experiences …………………………………46 4.4 Analysis ……………………………………………………………………………………..48 5. Discussion…………………………………………………………………………………….50 5.1 Governmental level ………………………………………………………………………….50 5.2 Corporate level ………………………………………………………………………………50 5.3 Personal level ………………………………………………………………………………..52 5.4 Proposition…………………………………………………………………………………...54 6. Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………….64 7. References....................................66 8. Appendix .....................................71 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject | 性別不平等 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Gender inequality | en |
| dc.title | 女性領導：法國和台灣工作場所不平等的跨文化分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Women in Leadership: A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Workplace Inequality in France and Taiwan | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 謝冠雄 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | Kuan-Hsiung Hsieh | en |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 杜志挺;陳建錦 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Du Chih-ting;Chien Chin Chen | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 性別不平等, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Gender inequality, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 72 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202501916 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-07-25 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 企業管理碩士專班 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2030-07-15 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 管理學院企業管理專班(Global MBA) | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 833.52 kB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。