Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 社會科學院
  3. 公共事務研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/99152
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor洪美仁zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorMei-Jen Hungen
dc.contributor.author張瓊妤zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorChiung-Yu Changen
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-21T16:35:40Z-
dc.date.available2025-08-22-
dc.date.copyright2025-08-21-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.date.submitted2025-07-30-
dc.identifier.citation壹、中文部分
人權公約施行監督聯盟(2022年12月02日)。【新聞稿】CEDAW 10,歧視歸零|CEDAW 國際審查會後民間團體記者會。https://covenantswatch.org.tw/2022/12/02/【新聞稿】cedaw-10,歧視歸零|cedaw-國際審查會後民間團/
內政部內授中戶字第0970066240號函釋(2008年11月03日)。https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/OldFile/law_file/0971107-1.doc
王浩翔(2021)。從「長髮員警案」談性別化的職場與相關法律規範。中央警察大學警察行政管理學報,17,117-135。
王輝煌(2017)。政策創新與官僚角色-臺灣解嚴後治理失能的分析。文官制度季刊,9(3),27-64。
台灣同志諮詢熱線協會(2024年01月18日)。《2023台灣跨性別族群生活處境報告》暨記者會。https://hotline.org.tw/news/3408?fbclid=IwAR0B_TAVHaf7zXS3Q2AejB3ypBk5M-Kq52rbeHsncRZCpqkOFWOZOeoTDHA
台灣伴侶權益推動聯盟(2021年07月15日)。【聲明】跨性別人權里程碑!法院判定雇主不得拒絕跨性別女性使用女廁。https://www.civilmedia.tw/archives/103377
台灣伴侶權益推動聯盟(2023年09月22日)。【新聞稿】跨性別免術換證,最高行政法院採支持見解!https://www.civilmedia.tw/archives/121247
台灣性別不明關懷協會(2016年11月20日)。跨性別紀念日活動記錄x新聞稿。https://www.istscare.org/2016/11/21/1050/
司法院釋字第748號解釋(2017年05月24日)。https://cons.judicial.gov.tw/docdata.aspx?fid=100&id=310929
成令方、王秀雲、游美惠、邱大昕、吳嘉苓譯(2008)。性別打結:拆除父權違建。群學。譯自Johnson, A. G. (1997). The Gender Knot: Unraveling Our Patriarchal Legacy. Temple University Press.
朱偉誠(2009)。性別主流化之後的台灣性/別與同志運動。台灣社會研究季刊,74,419-424。
行政院(2014)。《消除對婦女一切形式歧視公約》(CEDAW)第2次國家審查報告審查委員會總結意見與建議。https://gec.ey.gov.tw/Page/C6F72B97B2DE9F91
行政院(2022)。《消除對婦女一切形式歧視公約》(CEDAW)第4次國家審查報告國家報告專要文件。https://gec.ey.gov.tw/Page/B60CCDE79DFCA047
行政院(2023)。「我國多元性別(LGBTI)者生活狀況調查」委託研究報告(S1101013A)。https://doi.org/10.6141/TW-SRDA-AP010001-1
行政院人事行政總處(2021年05月25日)。什麼是員工協助方案。https://www.dgpa.gov.tw/mp/archive?uid=224&mid=223
行政院人權及轉型正義處(2024年05月02日)。反歧視法草案總說明。https://www.ey.gov.tw/File/2498FE176F4CBF86?A=C
行政院性別平等會(2019)。性別影響評估-法案及性別影響評估檢視表。https://gec.ey.gov.tw/Page/16C981909D6D1C83
行政院性別平等會(無日期)。性別主流化-計畫及成果。https://gec.ey.gov.tw/Page/5242009AF646447E,最後檢索日期:2024年06月20日。
何春蕤(2003)。跨性別。中央大學性/別研究室。
呂育誠、陳文學(2011)。從代表性官僚概念論身心障礙人員考試改進。國家菁英,7(1),97-119。
官曉薇(2019)。臺灣民主化後同志人權保障之變遷--法律與社會運動的觀點。中研院法學期刊,201910,551-615。
林吉輝(2020)。美國聯邦最高法院性別工作平權歷史性判決譯介-上。司法周刊,2023,2、3版。
林秀雲譯(2016)。社會科學研究方法(第十四版)。雙葉書廊。譯自Babbie, E. R. (1975). The Practice of Social Research. Wadsworth Publishing Company.
林佳和(無日期)。公部門public sector。全民勞教E網。https://labor-elearning.mol.gov.tw/co_abc_detail.php?rid=103,最後檢索日期:2024年06月21日。
法務部法律決字第1000028022號函釋(2012年01月18日)。https://mojlaw.moj.gov.tw/LawContentExShow.aspx?type=e&id=FE245345
徐志雲(2020)。認識跨性別者(T)及其處境。行政院多元性別權益保障種子訓練教材,103-130。https://gec.ey.gov.tw/Page/8B53584DC50F0FBA/54ea414c-a60e-4916-8af3-24d276dae0d6
張凱翔(2019年05月04-05日)。論公務人員創新想法、創新作為間關聯與年資在其中之影響。2019年台灣公共行政與公共事務系所聯合會年會暨國際學術研討會,臺中市,臺灣。https://www.taspaa.org/Paper_Info.aspx?ID=33
張潤書(2017)。行政學(修訂四版)。三民書局。
張瓊玲(2014)。文官制度中性別平等之研究-性別主流化觀點。中國行政評論,20(4),77-103。
產經新聞(2023年07月11日)。トイレ使用制限、国の対応「違法」 性同一性障害の経産省職員、最高裁が初判断。https://www.sankei.com/article/20230711-2XY73MQSXJMGXA64JNPA7UIJUU/
許慶復(2009)。政府部門人力多元化管理。高大法學論叢,5,1-22。
陳文學(2015)。文化職能與代表性官僚──原住民族地區鄉公所公務人員的實證分析。台灣原住民族研究學報,5(1),129-156。
陳文學(2021)。族群差異下的多元化管理──2008年台灣文官調查的資料分析。國家菁英季刊,14(4),13-28。
陳宜亨(2021)。永續發展目標的實踐-企業參與性別平等的重要性。臺北市立大學學報.人文社會類,52(2),17-32。
陳禹函(2011)。藏鏡人的心內話─同性戀公務人員的職場處境。〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立政治大學公共行政研究所。
陳美華(2014)。性別。收錄於王振寰、瞿海源主編,社會學與臺灣社會(第四版)(頁151-180),巨流圖書。
陳美華、蔡靜宜(2013)。說些醫生想聽的話-變性評估的性/別政治。台灣人權學刊,2(2),3-39。
陳語萱、劉育欣(2024)。跨性別者「性別不安診斷證明」對就業、經濟與健康之影響。社區發展季刊,185,333-347。
勞動部(2023)。112年性別工作平等申訴案件件數-按類別分。https://statdb.mol.gov.tw/html/sex/year112/8110.pdf
彭治鏐(2019)。失落篇幅、妝點粉飾:以同志觀點檢視CEDAW第3次國家報告。台灣人權學刊,5(1),119-124。
彭渰雯(2008)。當官僚遇上婦運:台灣推動性別主流化的經驗初探。東吳政治學報,26(4),1-58。
最高行政法院110年度上字第558號判決(2023年09月21日)。https://judgment.judicial.gov.tw/FJUD/data.aspx?ty=JD&id=TPAA,110%2c%e4%b8%8a%2c558%2c20230921%2c1
游美惠(2015)。交織性/交錯性。性別平等教育季刊,71,109-111。
焦興鎧(2009)。美國就業上性傾向歧視爭議之探討。歐美研究,39(1),29-77。
黃煥榮、方凱弘、蔡志恒(2011)。公務人力資源管理之性別議題與對策:組織建築模式之分析。文官制度季刊,3(2),49-80。
楊通軒(2008)。歐洲聯盟工作平等法制之探討,台灣勞工季刊,14,8-17。https://www.mol.gov.tw/2578/21000/22315/
楊雅婷、顏詩怡、司馬學文、林育如譯(2009)。跨越性別:模糊性別的界限。性別與女性研究手冊。韋伯。頁543-568。譯自McKenna, W. & Kessler, S. (2006) “Transgendering: Blurring the Boundaries of Gender.” In handbook of gender and women's studies. Davis, K., Evans, M., Lorber, J. Sage Publications, 342-354.
經濟社會文化權利國際公約第18號一般性意見(2005)。https://covenantswatch.org.tw/un-core-human-rights-treaties/icescr/
監察院(2018)。雙性人20180614委員會修調查報告(107教調0017)。https://www.cy.gov.tw/CyBsBoxContent.aspx?n=133&s=6087
台北高等行政法院109年度訴字第1077號判決(2021年05月27日)。https://judgment.judicial.gov.tw/FJUD/data.aspx?ty=JD&id=TPBA,109%2c%e8%a8%b4%2c1077%2c20210527%2c1
台北高等行政法院109年度訴字第275號判決(2021年09月23日)。https://judgment.judicial.gov.tw/FJUD/data.aspx?ty=JD&id=TPBA,109%2c%e8%a8%b4%2c275%2c20210923%2c1
潘淑滿(2022)。質性研究:理論與應用(第二版)。心理。
賴冠伶(2023年1月6日)。一次看懂歐亞各國法定性別變更規定,台灣該如何借鏡以保障跨性別者的人權?。關鍵評論網。https://www.thenewslens.com/article/170110
環境部環境管理署(2024年08月19日)。不遺落任何一個人 環境部推動性別友善廁所倍增行動方案!。環境部新聞專區。https://enews.moenv.gov.tw/Page/3B3C62C78849F32F/5491a694-9b66-4f39-940a-4122d79d2aff
瞿海源、畢恆達、劉長萱、楊國樞(主編)(2015)。社會及行為科學研究法:質性研究法。東華書局。
蘇英才(2010)。公務人員保障制度之研究--以臺灣省政府組織精簡為例。〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立暨南國際大學公共行政與政策學系。
貳、西文部分
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM) (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
American Psychological Association (APA). (2023, March 09). Understanding transgender people, gender identity and gender expression. https://www.apa.org/topics/lgbtq/transgender-people-gender-identity-gender-expression
Armstrong, C., Flood, P. C., Guthrie, J. P., Liu, W., MacCurtain, S. & Mkamwa, T. (2010). The impact of diversity and equality management on firm performance: Beyond high performance work systems. Human Resource Management, 49, 977-998.
Aultman, B. (2014). Cisgender. Transgender Studies Quarterly (TSQ), 1(1-2), 61-62.
Avery, D. R. & McKay, P. F. (2006). Target practice: An organizational impression management approach to attracting minority and female job applicants. Personnel Psychology, 59, 157-187.
Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88(4), 354-364.
Berg, B. L. (1998). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. (3rd ed.), Allyn & Bacon, Boston.
Bettcher, T. M. (2014). Transphobia. Transgender Studies Quarterly (TSQ), 1(1-2), 249-251.
Bockting, W. O. (1999). From construction to context: Gender through the eyes of the transgendered. Siecus Report, 28(1), 3-7.
Bockting, W. O., Miner, M. H., Swinburne Romine, R. E., Hamilton, A. & Coleman, E. (2013). Stigma, mental health, and resilience in an online sample of the US transgender population. American Journal of Public Health, 103(5), 943-951.
Brewster, M. E., Mennicke, A., Velez, B. L., & Tebbe, E. (2014). Voices from beyond: A thematic content analysis of transgender employees’ workplace experiences. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 1(2), 159-169.
Brown, C., Dashjian, L. T., Acosta, T. J., Mueller, C. T., Kizer, B. E., & Trangsrud, H. B. (2012). The career experiences of male-to-female transsexuals. The Counseling Psychologist, 40(6), 868-894.
Budge, S. L., Tebbe, E. N., & Howard, K. A. S. (2010). The work experiences of transgender individuals: Negotiating the transition and career decision-making processes. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57(4), 377-393.
Cancela, D., Stutterheim, S. E., & Uitdewilligen, S. (2024). The Workplace Experiences of Transgender and Gender Diverse Employees: A Systematic Literature Review Using the Minority Stress Model. Journal of Homosexuality, 1-29.
Carroll, L. & Gilroy, P. J. (2001). Teaching ‘outside the box’: Incorporating queer theory in counselor education. The Journal of Humanistic Counseling, Education and Development, 40, 49-57.
Collin, L., Reisner, S. L., Tangpricha, V., & Goodman, M. (2016). Prevalence of Transgender Depends on the "Case" Definition: A Systematic Review. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 13, 613.
Council of Europe. (2022, July 7). Thematic Report on Legal Gender Recognition in Europe. Council of Europe publishing. https://www.coe.int/en/web/sogi/-/new-report-on-legal-gender-recognition-in-europe
Cox, T. H., & Blake, S. (1991). Managing Cultural Diversity: Implications for Organizational Competitiveness. The Executive, 5(3), 45-56.
Baboolall, D., Greenberg, S., Obeid, M. & Zucker, J. (2021). Being transgender at work. McKinsey Quarterly. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/diversity-and-inclusion/being-transgender-at-work
Dietert, M., & Dentice, D. (2009). Gender identity issues and workplace discrimination: The transgender experience. Journal of Workplace Rights, 14(1), 121-140.
Dispenza, F., Watson, L. B., Chung, Y. B., & Brack, G. (2012). Experience of career-related discrimination for female-to-male transgender persons: A qualitative study. The Career Development Quarterly, 60(1), 65-81.
Dobbin, F. F. (2009). Inventing Equal Opportunity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Dray, K. K., Smith, V. R. E., Kostecki, T. P., Sabat, I. E. & Thomson, C. R. (2020). Moving beyond the gender binary: Examining workplace perceptions of nonbinary and transgender employees. Gender Work Organ, 27, 1181-1191.
Employee Assistance Professionals Association (EAPA). (2010). EAPA Standards and Professional Guidelines for Employee Assistance Programs. https://cdn.ymaws.com/eapassn.org/resource/resmgr/eapa_standards_and_professio.pdf
Ewoh, A. I. E. (2013). Managing and Valuing Diversity: Challenges to Public Managers in the 21st Century. Public Personnel Management, 42(2), 107-122.
Executive Order on Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in the Federal Workforce (EO 14035). (2021, June 25). https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/06/25/executive-order-on-diversity-equity-inclusion-and-accessibility-in-the-federal-workforce/
Executive Order on Preventing and Combating Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation (EO 13988). (2021, January 20). https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/01/20/executive-order-preventing-and-combating-discrimination-on-basis-of-gender-identity-or-sexual-orientation/
Fabeni, S. & Agius, S. (2009). Transgender people and the Gender Recast Directive. ILGA Europe Publishing. https://www.ilga-europe.org/report/transgender-people-and-the-gender-recast-directive/
Gitzi, A. & Köllen, T. (2006). Die Rolle von Partizipation im Diversity Management: Eine Praxisanalyse [The role of participation in diversity management: An analysis of current corporate practices]. In Bendl R., Hanappi-Egger E., Hofmann R. (Eds.), Agenda Diversität: Gender- und Diversitätsmanagement in Wissenschaft und Praxis [Agenda diversity: Gender and diversity management in science and practice] (pp. 25-43). München, Germany: Hampp.
Hansen, F. (2003). Diversity’s business case doesn’t add up. Workforce, 82(4), 28-32.
Hossain, M., Atif, M., Ahmed, A. & Mia, L. (2020). Do LGBT Workplace Diversity Policies Create Value for Firms?. J Bus Ethics, 167, 775-791.
Huffman, A. H., Mills, M. J., Howes, S. S. & Albritton, M. D. (2020). Workplace support and affirming behaviors: Moving toward a transgender, gender diverse, and non-binary friendly workplace. Int J Transgend Health, 22(3), 225-242.
Human Rights Campaign Foundation (HRC) (2023). Corporate Equality Index 2023-2024 report: Rating Workplaces on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer Equality. https://reports.hrc.org/corporate-equality-index-2023?_ga=2.33561890.289603888.1711093253-1976319344.1711093253
Jayne, M. E. A. & Dipboye, R. L. (2004). Leveraging diversity to improve business performance: Research findings and recommendations for organizations. Hum. Resour. Manage., 43, 409-424.
Jeffrey, M. J. (2023, February 22). U.S. LGBT Identification Steady at 7.2%. GALLUP. https://news.gallup.com/poll/470708/lgbt-identification-steady.aspx
Kcomt, L., Gorey, K. M., Barrett, B. J., & McCabe, S. E. (2020). Healthcare avoidance due to anticipated discrimination among transgender people: A call to create trans-affirmative environments. SSM-Population Health, 11, 100608.
Köllen, T. (2016). Intersexuality and Trans-Identities within the Diversity Management Discourse. In: Köllen, T. (eds) Sexual Orientation and Transgender Issues in Organizations. Springer, Cham.
Köllen, T. (2021). Diversity Management: A Critical Review and Agenda for the Future. Journal of Management Inquiry, 30(3), 259-272.
Larson, S. J. (2022). Actions for Queering American Public Administration. Administration & Society, 54(1), 145-163.
Lennon, E. & Mistler, B. J. (2014). Cisgenderism. Transgender Studies Quarterly (TSQ), 1(1-2), 63–64.
Lorbiecki, A. & Jack, G. (2000). Critical turns in the evolution of diversity management. British Journal of Management, 11(3), S17-S31.
McFadden, C. (2015). Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Careers and Human Resource Development: A Systematic Literature Review. Human Resource Development Review, 14(2), 125-162.
Meyer, I. H. (1995). Minority Stress and Mental Health in Gay Men. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36, 38.
Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychol Bull, 129(5), 674-697.
Milliken, F. J. & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21, 402-433.
Mizock, L., Riley, J., Yuen, N., Woodrum, T. D., Sotilleo, E. A., & Ormerod, A. J. (2018). Transphobia in the workplace: A qualitative study of employment stigma. Stigma and Health, 3(3), 275-282.
National Center for Transgender Equality (NCTE). (2024). Early Insights: a Report of the 2022 U.S. Transgender Survey (English). https://ustranssurvey.org/download-reports/
Ng, E. S. & Stephenson, J. (2015). Individuals, teams, and organizational benefits of managing diversity. In Bendl R., Bleijenbergh I., Henttonen E., Mills A. J. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of diversity in organizations (pp. 235-254). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Nielsen, M. W., Alegria, S., Börjeson, L., Etzkowitz, H., Falk-Krzesinski, H. J., Joshi, A., Leahey, E., Smith-Doerr, L., Woolley, A. W. & Schiebinger, L. (2017). Opinion: Gender diversity leads to better science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(8), 1740-1742.
OPM (2023). Government-wide DEIA: Our Progress and Path Forward to Building a Better Workforce for the American People - Annual Report 2022. https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/diversity-equity-inclusion-and-accessibility/reports/DEIA-Annual-Report-2022.pdf\
OPM (2023). Guidance Regarding Gender Identity and Inclusion in the Federal Workplace. https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/diversity-equity-inclusion-and-accessibility/reference-materials/guidance-regarding-gender-identity-and-inclusion-in-the-federal-workplace.pdf
Oppenheimer, D. B. (2016). The disappearance of voluntary affirmative action from the US workplace. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 24(1), 37-50.
Patrick, H. A. & Kumar, V. R. (2012). Managing Workplace Diversity: Issues and Challenges. SAGE Open, 2(2).
Planned Parenthood. (n.d.). What's transphobia, also called transmisia? Retrieved July 6, 2024, from https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/gender-identity/transgender/whats-transphobia
Sawyer, K., Thoroughgood, C. & Webster, J. (2016). Queering the Gender Binary: Understanding Transgender Workplace Experiences. In: Köllen, T. (eds) Sexual Orientation and Transgender Issues in Organizations. Springer, Cham.
Singal, M. & Gerde, V. W. (2015). Is diversity management related to financial performance in family firms? Family Business Review, 28, 243-259.
Sue, D. W., Capodilupo, C. M., Torino, G. C., Bucceri, J. M., Holder, A. M. B., Nadal, K. L. & Esquilin, M. (2007). Racial microaggressions in everyday life: Implications for clinical practice. American Psychologist, 62(4), 271–286.
The EU Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA). (2020). EU LGBT survey - A long way to go for LGBTI equality. Publications Office of the European Union. https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra_uploads/fra-2020-lgbti-equality-1_en.pdf
Thomas, R. Roosevelt Jr. (1990). From Affirmative Action to Affirming Diversity, Harvard Business Review, 107-117.
Transactual. (n.d.). Transphobia. Retrieved 2024, July 6, from https://transactual.org.uk/transphobia/
UN Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC). (1997, July 18). UN Economic and Social Council Resolution 1997/2: Agreed Conclusions, Refworld | UNHCR's Global Law and Policy Database. https://www.refworld.org/docid/4652c9fc2.html
Webber, S. S. & Donahue, L. M. (2001). Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 27, 141-162.
World Health Organization (WHO). (2018). International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) for Mortality and Morbidity Statistics. https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en#/http%3a%2f%2fid.who.int%2ficd%2fentity%2f411470068/
World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH). (2012). Standards of Care for the Health of Transsexual, Transgender, and Gender Nonconforming People (7th Version). https://www.wpath.org/publications/soc
Yadav, S. & Lenka, U. (2020), Diversity management: a systematic review. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, 39(8), 901-929.
Yasser, Q. R., Agrawal, R. & Ahmed, I. (2021). Transgender disclosure decisions and workplace socio-cultural dynamics. Labour & Industry: A Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work, 31(2), 87-105.
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/99152-
dc.description.abstract本研究旨在呈現與探討跨性別公務人員的職場處境,並從多元化管理(diversity management)之角度檢視、分析現行公部門相關政策與協助措施的不足,提出改善之建議;期許公部門能夠作為多元性別友善的標竿,帶動其他私部門、乃至整體社會更加關注跨性別之權益與處境。
本研究深度訪談了13位任職於公部門的跨性別者、2位倡議性別人權的非營利組織工作者與1位地方政府人事主管,發現跨性別公務人員在職場中承受了顯著的少數壓力(minority stress),導致其在求職與陞遷、空間使用、隱私資訊、人際互動等方面遭遇到不同的負面經驗;同時個人的性別轉換程度、年資等因素也會交織影響其職場經歷。而公部門雖然重視法律與公平性,並為公務人員提供了高度的工作權保障,但較為僵化、保守的體制也導致缺乏對於跨性別者需求的實際理解與支持,部分性別友善政策的推動也容易流於形式。
本研究認為,公部門應從過往追求齊頭式平等的手段,轉向更為積極的多元化管理,透過硬性措施──修改職場相關法規與軟性措施──建立跨性別員工友善指引雙管齊下,並與倡議性別人權的非營利組織共同合作。短期目標是要在不影響他人既有權益的情況下,改善公部門職場中對於跨性別公務人員的歧視與不利對待;長期目標則是要確實提升公務人員關於多元性別的知識與性別意識,不只是為了改善跨性別或多元性別公務人員的職場處境,更是為所有公務人員們營造更加多元、友善、共融的職場環境,進而提升社會整體性別平等之意識。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to present and explore the workplace experiences of transgender public servants. From the perspective of diversity management, it examines and analyzes the inadequacies of current public sector policies and support measures, proposing recommendations for improvement. The hope is that the public sector can serve as a benchmark for gender diversity and inclusion, encouraging the private sector and society as a whole to pay greater attention to the rights and situations of transgender individuals.
This study conducted in-depth interviews with 13 transgender civil servants in the public sector, two non-profit organization workers advocating for gender rights, and one local government human resources manager. The findings reveal that transgender public servants endure significant minority stress in the workplace, leading to various negative experiences in areas such as job seeking, promotion, use of space, personal privacy, and interpersonal interactions. Furthermore, factors such as an individual's stage of gender transition and seniority intersect to shape their workplace experiences. Although the public sector emphasizes law and fairness and provides strong employment protection for civil servants, its relatively rigid and conservative system leads to a lack of practical understanding and support for the needs of transgender individuals. Consequently, the promotion of some gender-friendly policies tends to be merely performative.
This study argues that the public sector should shift from its past pursuit of one-size-fits-all equality to a more proactive approach of diversity management. This can be achieved through a two-pronged strategy: implementing "hard" measures by amending workplace-related laws and regulations, and "soft" measures by establishing friendly guidelines for transgender employees, in collaboration with non-profit organizations advocating for gender rights. The short-term goal is to ameliorate discrimination and unfavorable treatment against transgender public servants in the workplace without infringing upon the existing rights of others. The long-term objective is to genuinely enhance the knowledge and awareness of gender diversity among all public servants. This is not only to improve the workplace situation for transgender and gender-diverse employees but also to foster a more diverse, friendly, and inclusive workplace environment for all civil servants, thereby advancing gender equality awareness throughout society.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-08-21T16:35:40Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2025-08-21T16:35:40Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents謝辭 i
摘要 ii
ABSTRACT iii
目次 v
圖次 vii
表次 viii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的與問題 5
第二章 文獻回顧 8
第一節 跨越二元性別的主體 8
第二節 跨性別者之職場處境與相關法規 14
第三節 私部門多元化管理 30
第四節 公部門多元化管理 44
第五節 小結 53
第三章 研究方法與設計 56
第一節 研究方法 56
第二節 訪談對象與題綱 57
第四章 公部門職場經驗 67
第一節 進入公部門前的職場經驗 67
第二節 進入公部門之緣由 74
第三節 公部門職場中的負面經驗 76
第四節 公部門職場中的正面經驗 106
第五節 公部門與私部門之比較 111
第六節 小結 116
第五章 多元性別相關政策現況與建議 119
第一節 多元性別者適用之政策與協助措施 119
第二節 非營利組織與公部門的合作狀況 127
第三節 受訪者對於多元性別政策的看法與建議 129
第四節 小結 144
第六章 結論與建議 146
第一節 歸納與討論 146
第二節 政策建議 163
第三節 研究限制與建議 169
第四節 省思 171
參考文獻 175
附錄 188
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subject多元化管理zh_TW
dc.subjectLGBTzh_TW
dc.subject性別友善職場zh_TW
dc.subject跨性別zh_TW
dc.subject職場處境zh_TW
dc.subject公務人員zh_TW
dc.subjectcivil servantsen
dc.subjectgender-inclusive workplaceen
dc.subjectLGBTen
dc.subjectdiversity managementen
dc.subjectworkplace experiencesen
dc.subjecttransgenderen
dc.title跨性別公務人員之職場處境與政策措施zh_TW
dc.titleThe Workplace Conditions and Policies of Transgender Civil Servants in Public Sectoren
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear113-2-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee李佩雯;Ciwang Teyrazh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteePei-Wen Lee;Ciwang Teyraen
dc.subject.keyword跨性別,公務人員,職場處境,多元化管理,LGBT,性別友善職場,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordtransgender,civil servants,workplace experiences,diversity management,LGBT,gender-inclusive workplace,en
dc.relation.page197-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202502826-
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)-
dc.date.accepted2025-08-01-
dc.contributor.author-college社會科學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept公共事務研究所-
dc.date.embargo-lift2025-08-22-
顯示於系所單位:公共事務研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-113-2.pdf3.4 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved