請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/99088完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 廖珮真 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Pei-Cheng Liao | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 劉庭羽 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Ting-Yu Liu | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-08-21T16:20:19Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-08-22 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-08-21 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-07-30 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 王子昀（2024）。ESG對公司財務績效的影響。﹝碩士論文，國立臺灣科技大學﹞。
石慧妤（2009）。應用企業年報中之文字資訊於盈餘預測之研究。﹝碩士論文，國立臺灣大學﹞。 吳怡慧（2014）。法人說明會與股票價格波動性之關聯性研究–以內容分析為例。﹝碩士論文，國立政治大學﹞。 邱慧貞（2012）。創新資本、審計品質與債務資金成本的關聯性研究－來自台灣中小企業的實證證據。﹝碩士論文，靜宜大學﹞。 林勇光（2021）。探討管理階層討論與分析之情緒分析與股價之關聯性。﹝碩士論文，國立政治大學﹞。 陳美惠、吳宴惠（2024）。ESG第三方確信、負面社會責任新聞報導與債務資金成本間之關聯性。會計評論，(78)，1-43。 陳麒証（2020）。審計委員會品質、產業專精會計師與企業債務資金成本之關聯性。﹝碩士論文，淡江大學﹞。 張華育（2024）。ESG績效評分對臺灣上市公司風險的影響之實證分析。﹝碩士論文，國立臺灣大學﹞。 章瑋傑、郭弘卿（2019）。企業社會責任報告書編製原因、認證與否及認證類型與股價反應之關聯性。評價學報，(13)，17-58。 鄧人碩、洪嫦闈（2023）。探究營建企業不當行為、財務績效與公司年報文字情緒之關係。中國土木水利工程學刊，35(8)，803-814。 鄭桂蕙、林宛瑩、汪瑞芝（2023）。SASB準則下環境社會治理績效與企業績效之關聯性。會計審計論叢，13(2)，1-40。 蔡榮真（2024）。永續報告書揭露語調與永續績效之關聯性。﹝碩士論文，國立臺灣大學﹞。 賴佳筠（2012）。年報中語調之改變對市場與未來績效之影響。﹝碩士論文，國立臺灣大學﹞。 Abou-El-Sood, H., & El-Sayed, D. (2022). Abnormal disclosure tone, earnings management and earnings quality. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 23(2), 402-433. Abrahamson, E., & Amir, E. (1996). THE INFORMATION CONTENT OF THE PRESIDENT'S LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 23(8). Aluchna, M., Roszkowska-Menkes, M., & Kamiński, B. (2023). From talk to action: The effects of the non-financial reporting directive on ESG performance. Meditari Accountancy Research, 31(7), 1-25. Artiach, T., Lee, D., Nelson, D., & Walker, J. (2010). The determinants of corporate sustainability performance. Accounting & Finance, 50(1), 31-51. Badertscher, B. A., Kim, J., Kinney Jr, W. R., & Owens, E. (2023). Assurance level choice, CPA fees, and financial reporting benefits: Inferences from US private firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 75(2-3), 101551. Baginski, S. P., Demers, E., Kausar, A., & Yu, Y. J. (2018). Linguistic tone and the small trader. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 68, 21-37. Bamber, L. S., & Cheon, Y. S. (1998). Discretionary management earnings forecast disclosures: Antecedents and outcomes associated with forecast venue and forecast specificity choices. Journal of accounting research, 36(2), 167-190. Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of business ethics, 97, 207-221. Bhat, D. C., Shenoy, S. S., Shetty, D. K., & Abhilash, A. (2024). Does Sustainability Assurance enhance the connection between Corporate Governance and Firm Performance in India?. Investment Management & Financial Innovations, 21(3), 211. Birindelli, G., Dell’Atti, S., Iannuzzi, A. P., & Savioli, M. (2018). Composition and activity of the board of directors: Impact on ESG performance in the banking system. Sustainability, 10(12), 4699 Botosan, C. A. (1997). Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. Accounting review, 323-349. Bushee, B. J., Matsumoto, D. A., & Miller, G. S. (2003). Open versus closed conference calls: the determinants and effects of broadening access to disclosure. Journal of accounting and economics, 34(1-3), 149-180. Byron, K., & Post, C. (2016). Women on boards of directors and corporate social performance: A meta‐analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(4), 428-442. Cheng, M. M., Green, W. J., & Ko, J. C. W. (2015). The impact of strategic relevance and assurance of sustainability indicators on investors' decisions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 34(1), 131-162. Chiu, A. A., Chen, L. N., & Hu, J. C. (2020). A study of the relationship between corporate social responsibility report and the stock market. Sustainability, 12(21), 9200. Cho, C. H., Roberts, R. W., & Patten, D. M. (2010). The language of US corporate environmental disclosure. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(4), 431-443. Chu, C. C., Ho, K. C., Lo, C. C., Karathanasopoulos, A., & Jiang, I. M. (2019). Information disclosure, transparency ranking system and firms’ value deviation: Evidence from Taiwan. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 53, 721-747. Coller, M., & Yohn, T. L. (1997). Management forecasts and information asymmetry: An examination of bid-ask spreads. Journal of accounting research, 35(2), 181-191. Davis, A. K., Piger, J. M., & Sedor, L. M. (2012). Beyond the numbers: Measuring the information content of earnings press release language. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(3), 845-868. De Meyst, K. J., Cardinaels, E., & Van den Abbeele, A. (2024). CSR disclosures in buyer-seller markets: The impact of assurance of CSR disclosures and incentives for CSR investments. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 113, 101498. Demers, E., & Vega, C. (2008). Soft information in earnings announcements: News or noise?. Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The accounting review, 86(1), 59-100. Dhaliwal, D. S., Radhakrishnan, S., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2012). Nonfinancial disclosure and analyst forecast accuracy: International evidence on corporate social responsibility disclosure. The accounting review, 87(3), 723-759. Drempetic, S., Klein, C., & Zwergel, B. (2020). The influence of firm size on the ESG score: Corporate sustainability ratings under review. Journal of business ethics, 167(2), 333-360. Du, S., & Yu, K. (2021). Do corporate social responsibility reports convey value relevant information? Evidence from report readability and tone. Journal of business ethics, 172, 253-274. Fisher, R., Van Staden, C. J., & Richards, G. (2020). Watch that tone: An investigation of the use and stylistic consequences of tone in corporate accountability disclosures. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33(1), 77-105. Frankel, R., Johnson, M., & Skinner, D. J. (1999). An empirical examination of conference calls as a voluntary disclosure medium. Journal of Accounting Research, 37(1), 133-150. Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of sustainable finance & investment, 5(4), 210-233. Godbole, N., Srinivasaiah, M., & Skiena, S. (2007). Large-scale sentiment analysis for news and blogs. Icwsm, 7(21), 219-222. Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2006). International differences in the cost of equity capital: Do legal institutions and securities regulation matter?. Journal of accounting research, 44(3), 485-531. Hazaea, S. A., Zhu, J., Khatib, S. F., Bazhair, A. H., & Elamer, A. A. (2022). Sustainability assurance practices: A systematic review and future research agenda. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(4), 4843-4864. Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of accounting and economics, 31(1-3), 405-440. Healy, P. M., Hutton, A. P., & Palepu, K. G. (1999). Stock performance and intermediation changes surrounding sustained increases in disclosure. Contemporary accounting research, 16(3), 485-520. Henry, E. (2008). Are investors influenced by how earnings press releases are written?. The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 45(4), 363-407. Hoang, H., & Trotman, K. T. (2021). The effect of CSR assurance and explicit assessment on investor valuation judgments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 40(1), 19-33. Hope, O. K. (2003). Disclosure practices, enforcement of accounting standards, and analysts' forecast accuracy: An international study. Journal of accounting research, 41(2), 235-272. Huang, J., Wang, D. D., & Wang, Y. (2024). Textual Attributes of Corporate Sustainability Reports and ESG Ratings. Sustainability, 16(21), 9270. Huang, X., Teoh, S. H., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Tone management. The accounting review, 89(3), 1083-1113. Hummel, K., & Schlick, C. (2016). The relationship between sustainability performance and sustainability disclosure–Reconciling voluntary disclosure theory and legitimacy theory. Journal of accounting and public policy, 35(5), 455-476. Hussain, N., Rigoni, U., & Orij, R. P. (2018). Corporate governance and sustainability performance: Analysis of triple bottom line performance. Journal of business ethics, 149, 411-432. Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2019). The consequences of mandatory corporate sustainability reporting. Kaya, I. (2017). Sustainability reporting assurance: a literature survey. In Regional studies on economic growth, financial economics and management: proceedings of the 19th Eurasia Business and Economics Society Conference (pp. 33-50). Springer International Publishing. Kim, H. J., & Yang, O. S. (2025). Linking ESG Management to Corporate Success: The Influence of Board Composition. Sustainability, 17(3), 819. Kim, J., Cho, K., & Park, C. K. (2019). Does CSR assurance affect the relationship between CSR performance and financial performance?. Sustainability, 11(20), 5682. Kuo, L., Kuo, P. W., & Chen, C. C. (2021). Mandatory CSR disclosure, CSR assurance, and the cost of debt capital: Evidence from Taiwan. Sustainability, 13(4), 1768. L Gandía, J., & Huguet, D. (2020). Audit fees and cost of debt: differences in the credibility of voluntary and mandatory audits. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 33(1), 3071-3092. Lang, M. H., & Lundholm, R. J. (1996). Corporate disclosure policy and analyst behavior. Accounting review, 467-492. Larcker, D. F., & Zakolyukina, A. A. (2012). Detecting deceptive discussions in conference calls. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(2), 495-540. Leuz, C., & Verrecchia, R. E. (2000). The economic consequences of increased disclosure. Journal of accounting research, 91-124. Li, F. (2010). The information content of forward‐looking statements in corporate filings—A naïve Bayesian machine learning approach. Journal of accounting research, 48(5), 1049-1102. Li, R., Wu, H., Zhong, M., & Lan, H. (2024). Strategic tone management in ESG reports and ESG risk. International Review of Financial Analysis, 96, 103618. Liang, X., & Wu, H. (2022). Does the tone in corporate social responsibility reports misdirect analysts’ forecasts in China?. Sustainability, 14(24), 16631. Lin, Z., Zhang, Q., & Deng, C. (2024). Multiple Large Shareholders and ESG Performance: Evidence from Shareholder Friction. Sustainability (2071-1050), 16(15). López-Iturriaga, F. J., & López-de-Foronda, Ó. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and reference shareholders: An analysis of European multinational firms. Transnational Corporations Review, 3(3), 17-33. Loughran, T., & McDonald, B. (2011). When is a liability not a liability? Textual analysis, dictionaries, and 10‐Ks. The Journal of finance, 66(1), 35-65. Loughran, T., & McDonald, B. (2016). Textual analysis in accounting and finance: A survey. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(4), 1187-1230. Malik, N., & Kashiramka, S. (2025). ESG disclosure and its impact on firm leverage: Moderating role of quality of financial reporting and financial constraints. Global Finance Journal, 65, 101099. Martínez‐Ferrero, J., & García‐Sánchez, I. M. (2017). Sustainability assurance and cost of capital: Does assurance impact on credibility of corporate social responsibility information?. Business Ethics: A European Review, 26(3), 223-239. Menicucci, E., & Paolucci, G. (2022). Board diversity and ESG performance: evidence from the Italian banking sector. Sustainability, 14(20), 13447. Miralles-Quirós, M. M., Miralles-Quirós, J. L., & Daza-Izquierdo, J. (2021). The assurance of sustainability reports and their impact on stock market prices. Cuadernos de Gestión, 21(1), 47-60. Nguyen, D. T. T. (2020). An empirical study on the impact of sustainability reporting on firm value. Journal of Competitiveness. Pittman, J. A., & Fortin, S. (2004). Auditor choice and the cost of debt capital for newly public firms. Journal of accounting and economics, 37(1), 113-136. Price, S. M., Doran, J. S., Peterson, D. R., & Bliss, B. A. (2012). Earnings conference calls and stock returns: The incremental informativeness of textual tone. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(4), 992-1011. Sengupta, P. (1998). Corporate disclosure quality and the cost of debt. Accounting review, 459-474. Shen, H., Wu, H., & Chand, P. (2017). The impact of corporate social responsibility assurance on investor decisions: Chinese evidence. International Journal of Auditing, 21(3), 271-287. Stuart, A. C. (2023). The influence of corporate social responsibility disclosures and assurance on jurors’ judgments. Current Issues in Auditing, 17(1), A36-A49. Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance–financial performance link. Strategic management journal, 18(4), 303-319. Yang, X., Bao, J., & Zhang, K. (2025). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance and abnormal positive tone. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 16(2), 351-388. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/99088 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 永續報告書是企業揭露ESG（環境、社會、公司治理）績效的重要工具，其內容涵蓋定量指標與敘述文字，後者允許企業透過語調等語言策略傳達資訊並形塑形象。然而，相較於財務報告語調影響投資人已有大量研究，永續報告的語調及異常語調的研究仍相對有限。過去ESG揭露文獻著重揭露程度與品質，較少探討「如何揭露」。因此，本研究聚焦永續報告書發布與否、第三方確信、文字語調及異常語調四構面，探討其與臺灣公司ESG績效的關聯。
本研究以2021–2023年臺灣企業為樣本，分析永續報告書文本內容，以正負字數比值衡量語調，異常語調則以語調偏離企業特徵預期值衡量，並以各公司ESG評等分數作為ESG績效之代理變數。透過多元迴歸檢驗報告揭露、第三方確信、語調正向程度與異常語調對ESG績效的影響，控制公司規模、財務績效等變數。 實證結果顯示，發布永續報告書的公司ESG分數顯著高於未發布者；報告經第三方確信亦與ESG分數顯著正相關。此外，語調愈正向，ESG評等愈高，尤以社會與治理構面受影響較大。異常樂觀語調同樣與ESG評等呈正相關，意即企業透過超出預期的語氣可提高外界對永續表現的評價。上述發現填補永續報告語調與ESG績效關係之研究缺口，亦凸顯非財務資訊溝通方式對ESG評價的重要性。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Sustainability reports serve as key instruments for companies to communicate their ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) performance, which include both quantitative data and narrative descriptions. While prior studies have explored tone in financial disclosures, little is known about the relationship between tone / abnormal tone and ESG performance. This study investigates the effects of report disclosure, third-party assurance, tone, and abnormal tone on ESG scores, which are proxies of ESG performance, among Taiwanese companies from 2021 to 2023.
Empirical results reveal that firms disclosing sustainability reports and those obtaining third-party assurance receive significantly higher ESG scores. Moreover, reports with more positive tone are associated with better ESG ratings, particularly in the social and governance dimensions. Abnormal positive tone also correlates positively with ESG scores, suggesting that excessive positivity can enhance external perception of sustainability performance. These findings highlight the importance of not just what is disclosed, but how it is communicated, and underscore the need for ESG rating agencies to account for linguistic strategies and assurance quality in their assessments. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-08-21T16:20:19Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-08-21T16:20:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 i
Abstract ii 目次 iii 圖次 v 表次 vi 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景 1 1.2 研究動機與目的 3 1.3 研究架構 5 第二章 文獻回顧與假說建立 6 2.1 資訊揭露 6 2.2 查核與確信 8 2.3 語調分析 10 2.4 異常語調 12 2.5 ESG績效 14 2.6 假說發展與建立 16 第三章 研究設計 20 3.1 研究架構 20 3.2 變數衡量 21 3.2.1 應變數 21 3.2.2 自變數 22 3.2.3 控制變數 23 3.3 實證模型 27 3.4 樣本與資料 28 第四章 實證結果與分析 34 4.1 敘述性統計 34 4.2 相關係數 37 4.3 迴歸結果 40 4.3.1 H1：永續報告書揭露與 ESG 績效之關聯性 40 4.3.2 H2：永續報告書之確信與 ESG 績效之關聯性 41 4.3.3 H3：永續報告書語調與 ESG 績效之關聯性 45 4.3.4 H4：永續報告書異常語調與 ESG 績效之關聯性 46 4.4 穩健性測試 50 4.4.1 語調變數替代衡量方式之穩健性測試 50 4.4.2 異常語調替代變數之穩健性測試 52 4.5 額外測試 54 第五章 結論 56 5.1 研究結論 56 5.2 研究限制與建議 58 參考文獻 61 中文參考文獻 61 英文參考文獻 63 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 確信 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 永續報告書 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | ESG績效 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 異常語調 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 語調 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Sustainability report | en |
| dc.subject | Abnormal tone | en |
| dc.subject | Tone | en |
| dc.subject | Assurance | en |
| dc.subject | ESG performance | en |
| dc.title | 永續報告書之特性與ESG績效之關聯 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | An Empirical Study on Sustainability Report Attributes and ESG Performance | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 顏如君;吳思蓉 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Ju-Chun Yen;Szu-Jung Wu | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 永續報告書,確信,語調,異常語調,ESG績效, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Sustainability report,Assurance,Tone,Abnormal tone,ESG performance, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 69 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202502956 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-08-01 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | N/A | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 會計學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.27 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。