請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/9904
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 朱樹勳(Shu-Hsun Chu) | |
dc.contributor.author | Kuan-Ming Chiu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 邱冠明 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T20:48:32Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2008-08-13 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T20:48:32Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2008-08-13 | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2008-07-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Acar C, Farge A, Chardigny C, Beyssen B, Pagny JY, Grare P, Fabiani JN, Deloche A, Guermonprez JL, Carpentier A. Use of the radial artery for coronary artery bypass: a new experience after 20 years. Archives des Maladies du Coeur et des Vaisseaux 1993;86: 1683-9.
2. Alexander MJ, Perna J. Endoscopic saphenous vein graft harvest for extracranial–intracranial bypass procedures. Surg Neurol 2005;63:565-8. 3. Allen KB, Griffith GL, Heimansohn DA, Robison RJ, Matheny RG, Schier JJ, Fitzgerald EB, Shaar CJ. Endoscopic versus traditional saphenous vein harvesting: a prospective, randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:26 –31. 4. Allen KB, Heimansohn DA, Robison RJ, Schier JJ, Griffith GL, Fitzgerald EB. Influence of endoscopic versus traditional saphenectomy on event-free survival: five-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial. Heart Surg Forum 2003;6:e143-5. 5. Allen KB, Heimansohn DA, Robison RJ, Schier JJ, Griffith GL, Fitzgerald EB, Isch JH, Abraham S, Shaar CJ. Risk factors for leg wound complications following endoscopic versus traditional saphenous vein harvesting. Heart Surg Forum 2000;3:325-30. 6. Alrawi S, Balaya F, Raju R, Shirazian D, Acinapura A, Cunningham J. Nitric oxide expression by interleukin-10 in the endoscopic and open methods of vein harvesting in coronary artery bypass surgery. JSLS 2002;6:5-9. 7. Alrawi SJ, Balaya F, Raju R, Cunningham JN Jr, Acinapura AJ. A comparative study of endothelial cell injury during open and endoscopic saphenectomy: an electron microscopic evaluation. Heart Surg Forum 2001;4:120-7 8. Alrawi SJ, Raju R, Alshkaki G, Acinapura AJ, Cunningham JN Jr. Saphenous vein endothelial cell viability: a comparative study of endoscopic and open saphenectomy for coronary artery bypass grafting. JSLS 2001;5:37-45. 9. Alrawi SJ, Raju R, Satheesan R, Cunningham JN, Acinapaura AJ. Interleukin-1, interleukin-2 and interleukin-10 expression in different techniques of saphenous vein harvesting. Heart Surg Forum 2001;4:47-52. 10. Alrawi SJ, Samee M, Raju R, Shirazian D, Acinapura AJ, Cunningham JN. Intercellular and vascular cell adhesion molecule levels in endoscopic and open saphenous vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass surgery. Heart Surg Forum 2000;3:241-5. 11. Anonymous: First-year results of CABRI (Coronary Angioplasty versus Bypass Revascularisation Investigation). CABRI Trial Participants. Lancet 1995;346:1179-84. 12. Banks TA, Manetta F, Glick M, Graver LM. Carbon dioxide embolism during minimally invasive vein harvesting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002; 73:296-7. 13. Bhan A, Gupta V, Choudhary SK, Sharma R, Singh B, Aggarwal R, Bhargava B, Sharma AV, Venugopal P. Radial artery in CABG: could the early results be comparable to internal mammary artery graft? Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:1631-6. 14. Bishop-Bailey D, Mitchell JA, and Warner TD. COX-2 in cardiovascular disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2006;26;956-8. 15. Bitondo JM, Daggett WM, Torchiana DF, Akins CW, Hilgenberg AD, Vlahakes GJ, Madsen JC, MacGillivray TE, Agnihotri AK. Endoscopic Versus Open Saphenous Vein Harvest:A Comparison of Postoperative Wound Complications. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:523-8 16. Borger MA, Cohen G, Buth KJ, Rao V, Bozinovski J, Liaghati-Nasseri N, Mallidi H, Feder-Elituv R, Sever J, Christakis GT, Bhatnagar G, Goldman BS, Cohen EA, Fremes SE. Multiple arterial grafts: radial versus right internal thoracic arteries. Circulation 1998;98:7-13. 17. Bourassa MG. Clinical trials of coronary revascularization: coronary angioplasty vs. coronary bypass grafting. Curr Opin Cardiol 2000;15:281-6. 18. Bravata DM, Gienger AL, McDonald KM, Sundarum V, Perez MV, Varghese R, Kapoor JR, Ardehali R, Owens DK, Hlatky MA. Systemic review: the comparative effectiveness of percutaneous coronary interventions and coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann Intern Med 2007;147:703-16. 19. Brodman RF, Frame R, Camacho M, Hu E, Chen A, Hollinger I. Routine use of unilateral and bilateral radial arteries for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:959-63. 20. Buxton B, Fuller J, Gaer J, Liu JJ, Mee J, Sinclair R, Windsor M. The radial artery as a bypass graft. Curr Opin Cardiol 1996;11:591-8. 21. Calafiore AM, Teodori G, Di Giammarco G, D'Annunzio E, Angelini R, Vitolla G, Maddestra N. Coronary revascularization with the radial artery: new interest for an old conduit. J Card Surg 1995;10:140-6. 22. Cameron A, Davis KB, Green G, Schaff HV. Coronary bypass surgery with internal-thoracic-artery grafts-effects on survival over a 15-year period. N Engl J Med 1996;334:216-20. 23. Caputo M, Reeves B, Marchetto G, Mahesh B, Lim K, Angelini GD. Radial versus right internal thoracic artery as a second arterial conduit for coronary surgery: early and midterm outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126:39-47. 24. Carpino PA, Khabbaz KR, Bojar RM, Rastegar H, Warner KG, Murphy RE, Payne DD.Clinical benefits of endoscopic vein harvesting in patients with risk factors for saphenectomy wound infections undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;119:69-75. 25. Chaitman BR, Rosen AD, Williams DO, Bourassa MG, Aguirre FV, Pitt B, Rautaharju PM, Rogers WJ, Sharaf B, Attubato M, Hardison RM, Srivatsa S, Kouchoukos NT, Stocke K, Sopko G, Detre K, Frye R. Myocardial infarction and cardiac mortality in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) randomized trial. Circulation 1997;96:2162-70. 26. Chavanon O, Ducharme B, Carrier M, Cartier R, Hébert Y, Pagé P, Pellerin M, Pelletier LC, Perrault LP. Endoscopic saphenectomy for coronary artery bypass surgery: comparison of two techniques with and without carbon dioxide insufflation. Can J Cardiol. 2000;16:757-61. 27. Chavanon O, Tremblay I, Delay D, Bouveret A, Blain R, Perrault LP.Carbon dioxide embolism during endoscopic saphenectomy for coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;118:557-8. 28. Chen AH, Nakao T, Brodman RF, Greenberg M, Charney R, Menegus M, Johnson M, Grose R, Frame R, Hu EC, Choi HK, Safyer S. Early postoperative angiographic assessment of radial grafts used for coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;111: 1208-12. 29. Chitwood WR Jr, Gulielmos V: What is minimally invasive cardiac surgery? CTSnet Web site. 2003 22 30. Chong WC, Ong PJ, Hayward C, Moat N, Collins P. Effects of storage solutions on in vitro vasoreactivity of radial artery conduits. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;122:470-5. 31. Couture P, Boudreault D, Derouin M, Allard M, Lepage Y, Girard D, Blaise G. Venous carbon dioxide embolism in pigs: an evaluation of end-tidal carbon dioxide, transesophageal echocardiography, pulmonary artery pressure, and precordial auscultation as monitoring modalities. Anesth Analg. 1994;79:876-83. 32. Crouch JD, O'Hair DP, Keuler JP, Barragry TP, Werner PH, Kleinman LH. Open versus endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting: wound complications and vein quality. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:1513-6. 33. Diegeler A, Thiele H, Falk V, Hambrecht R, Spyrantis N, Sick P, Diederich KW, Mohr FW, Schuler G. Comparison of stenting with minimally invasive bypass surgery for stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery. N Engl J Med 2002;347:561-6. 34. Felisky CD, Paull DL, Hill ME, Hall RA, Ditkoff M, Campbell WG, Guyton SW.Endoscopic greater saphenous vein harvesting reduces the morbidity of coronary artery bypass surgery. Am J Surg. 2002;183:576-9. 35. Galajda Z, Jagamos E, Maros T, Péterffy A. Radial artery grafts: surgical anatomy and harvesting techniques. Cardiovasc Surg 2002;10:476-80. 36. Genovesi MH, Torrillo L, Fonger J, Patel N, McCabe JC, Subramanian VA. Endoscopic radial artery harvest: a new approach. Heart Surg Forum 2001;4: 223-4. 37. Gibbons RJ, Fihn SD. Coronary Revascularization: new evidence, new challenges. Ann Intern Med 2007;147:732-734. 38. Griffith GL, Allen KB, Waller BF, Heimansohn DA, Robison RJ, Schier JJ, Shaar CJ. Endoscopic and traditional saphenous vein harvest: a histologic comparison. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:520-3. 39. Hannan EL, Racz MJ, Walford G, Jones RH, Ryan TJ, Bennett E, Culliford AT, Isom OW, Gold JP, Rose EA. Long-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting versus stent implantation.N Engl J Med 2005;352:2174-83. 40. Hata M, Seevanayagam S, Manson N, Rosalion A, Matalanis G, Raman J, Buxton BF. Radial artery 2000: risk analysis of mortality for coronary bypass surgery with radial artery. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;8: 354-7. 41. He GW. Verapamil plus nitroglycerin solution maximally preserves endothelial function of the radial artery: comparison with papaverine solution. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;115:1321-7. 42. Herron DM, Vernon JK, Gryska PV, Reines HD. Venous gas embolism during endoscopy. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:276-9. 43. Hirose H, Amano A, Takanashi S, Takahashi A. Coronary artery bypass grafting using the gastroepiploic artery in 1,000 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:1371-9. 44. Izzat MB, Yim AP. Video-assisted internal mammary artery mobilization for minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1997;12:811-2. 45. Kamiya H, Ushijima T, Kanamori T, Ikeda C, Nakagaki C, Ueyama K, Watanabe G. Use of the radial artery graft after transradial catheterization: is it suitable as a bypass conduit? Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76: 1505-9. 46. Khan NE, De Souza A, Mister R, Flather M, Clague J, Davies S, Collins P, Wang D, Sigwart U, Pepper J. A randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multivessel coronaryartery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2004;350:21-8. 47. Kiaii B, Moon BC, Massel D, Langlois Y, Austin TW, Willoughby A, Guiraudon C, Howard CR, Guo LR. A prospective randomized trial of endoscopic versus conventional harvesting of the saphenous vein in coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;123:204-12 48. Lattouf OM, Puskas JD, Thourani VH, Noora J, Kilgo PD, Guyton RA. Does the number of grafts influence surgeon choice and patient benefit of off-pump over conventional on-pump coronary artery revascularization in multivessel coronary artery disease? Ann Thorac Surg 2007;84:1485-95. 49. Leavitt BJ, O'Connor GT, Olmstead EM, Morton JR, Maloney CT, Dacey LJ, Hernandez F, Lahey SJ. Use of the internal mammary artery graft and in-hospital mortality and other adverse outcomes associated with coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation 2001;103:507-12. 50. Levy JH, Tanaka KA. Inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:S715-20. 51. Lin SM, Chang WK, Tsao CM, Ou CH, Chan KH, Tsai SK. Carbon dioxide embolism diagnosed by transesophageal echocardiography during endoscopic vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting. Anesth Analg. 2003;96:683-5. 52. Lin TY, Chiu KM, Wang MJ, Chu SH. Carbon dioxide embolism during endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting in coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126:2011-5. 53. Louagie Y, Buche M, Jamart J, Eucher P, Haxhe JP, Schoevaerdts JC. Operative risk assessment in coronary artery bypass surgery, 1990-1993: evaluation of perioperative variables. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;43:134-41. 54. Mack M, Acuff T, Yong P, Jett GK, Carter D. Minimally invasive thoracoscopically assisted coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1997;12:20-4. 55. Mack MJ, Osborne JA, Shennib H. Arterial graft patency in coronary artery bypass grafting: what do we really know? Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:1055-9. 56. Meharwal ZS, Trehan N. Functional status of the hand after radial artery harvesting: results in 3,977 cases. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:1557-61. 57. Newman MF, Kirchner JL, Phillips-Bute B, Gaver V, Grocott H, Jones RH, Mark DB, Reves JG, Blumenthal JA, Neurological Outcome Research Group and the Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology Research Endeavors Investigators. Longitudinal assessment of neurocognitive function after coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2001;344:395-402. 58. Newman RV, Lammle WG. Radial artery harvest using endoscopic techniques. Heart Surg Forum 2003;6:194-5. 59. Patel AN, Hebeler RF, Hamman BL, Hunnicutt C, Williams M, Liu L, Wood RE. Prospective analysis of endoscopic vein harvesting. Am J Surg 182:716-9. 60. Patel AN, Hebeler RF, Hamman BL, Hunnicutt C, Williams M, Liu L, Wood RE. Prospective analysis of endoscopic vein harvesting. Am J Surg 2001;182:716-9. 61. Phillips J, Keith D, Hulka J, Hulka B, Keith L. Gynecologic laparoscopy in 1975. J Reprod Med. 1976;6:105-17. 62. Possati G, Gaudino M, Prati F, Alessandrini F, Trani C, Glieca F, Mazzari MA, Luciani N, Schiavoni G. Long-term results of the radial artery used for myocardial revascularization. Circulation 2003;108:1350-4. 63. Puskas JD, Edwards FH, Pappas PA, O'Brien S, Peterson ED, Kilgo P, Ferguson TB Jr. Off-pump techniques benefit men and women narrow the disparity in mortality after coronary bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;84:1447-56. 64. Puskas JD, Sharoni E, Williams WH, Petersen R, Duke P, Guyton RA. Is routine use of temporary epicardial pacing wires necessary after either OPCAB or conventional CABG/CPB? Heart Surg Forum 2003;6:e143-5 65. Reston JT, Tregear SJ, Turkelson CM. Meta-analysis of short-term and mid-term outcomes following off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:1510-5. 66. Rodrigus IE, Stockman B, Amsel BJ, Moulijn AC. Should we use video-assisted endoscopic vein harvesting as a standard technique? Heart Surg Forum 2001;4:53-5 67. Sabik JF, Gillinov AM, Blackstone EH, Vacha C, Houghtaling PL, Navia J, Smedira NG, McCarthy PM, Cosgrove DM, Lytle BW. Does off-pump coronary surgery reduce morbidity and mortality? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;124:698-707. 68. Scarborough JE, White W, Derilus FE, Mathew JP, Newman MF, Landolfo KP. Neurologic outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting with and without cardiopulmonary bypass. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;15:52-62. 69. Schurr UP, Lachat ML, Reuthebuch O, Kadner A, Mäder M, Seiffert B, Hoerstrup SP, Zünd G, Genoni M, Turina MI. Endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting for CABG: a randomized, prospective trial. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;50:160-3. 70. Seabolt PB, Reardon MJ. Endoscopic vein harvesting in cardiac surgery. Curr Opin Cardiol 2003;18:444-6. 71. Selnes OA, Goldsborough MA, Borowicz LM, McKhann GM. Neurobehavioural sequelae of cardiopulmonary bypass. Lancet 1999;353:1601-6. 72. Shapira OM, Xu A, Vita JA, Aldea GS, Shah N, Shemin RJ, Keaney JF Jr. Nitroglycerin is superior to diltiazem as a coronary bypass conduit vasodilator. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;117:906-11. 73. Sharony R, Bizekis CS, Kanchuger M, Galloway AC, Saunders PC, Applebaum R, Schwartz CF, Ribakove GH, Culliford AT, Baumann FG, Kronzon I, Colvin SB, Grossi EA. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting reduces mortality and stroke in patients with atheromatous aortas: a case control study. Circulation 2003;108:II15-20. 74. Solomon AJ, Gersh BJ. Management of chronic stable angina: medical therapy, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, and coronary artery bypass graft surgery—lessons from the randomized trials. Ann Intern Med 1998;128:216-23. 75. Tatoulis J, Buxton BF, Fuller JA. Patencies of 2127 arterial to coronary conduits over 15 years. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77: 93-101. 76. Tatoulis J, Royse AG, Buxton BF, Fuller JA, Skillington PD, Goldblatt JC, Brown RP, Rowland MA. The radial artery in coronary surgery: a 5-year experience—clinical and angiographic results. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:143-7. 77. van Dijk D, Keizer AM, Diephuis JC, Durand C, Vos LJ, Hijman R. Neurocognitive dysfunction after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;120:632-9. 78. Venkateswaran RV, Charman SC, Goddard M, Large SR. Lethal mesenteric ischaemia after cardiopulmonary bypass: a common complication? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;22:534-8. 79. Verma S, Buchanan MR, Anderson TJ. Endothelial function testing as a biomarker of vascular disease. Circulation 2003;108;2054-9. 80. Vrancic JM, Piccinini F, Vaccarino G, Iparraguirre E, Albertal J, Navia D.Endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting: initial experience and learning curve. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70:1086-9. 81. Yun KL, Wu Y, Aharonian V, Mansukhani P, Pfeffer TA, Sintek CF, Kochamba GS, Grunkemeier G, Khonsari S. Randomized trial of endoscopic versus open vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: six-month patency rates. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;129:496-503. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/9904 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 將微創手術運用於血管摘取是現今進行冠狀動脈繞道手術的趨勢,其除了能縮小手術傷口外,更顯著的減少術後的傷口疼痛、縮短住院時間、縮短臥床的時間、使病患進行早期復建,同時提升了病患滿意度。自2001年迄今,我已為超過1,700名冠心病患進行冠狀動脈繞道手術,其中300多名病患進行微創的冠狀動脈繞道手術,在這些案例中,因為一些臨床的經驗與觀察,我們針對使用內視鏡時常用以輔助的二氧化碳充氣來探討二氧化碳造成栓塞的發生率、嚴重度及其與壓力大小之關連,並研究使用內視鏡摘取大隱靜脈對內皮細胞造成的影響。
第一部分,我們以經食道超音波探討二氧化碳造成栓塞的發生率與嚴重度,結果發現在403位病患中,共有17.1%位病患發生二氧化碳栓塞,程度可分為少量(13.1%)、中量(3.5%)、及多量(0.5%)氣泡,中量至多量好發於清除大隱靜脈分枝的當下,但在統計上並沒有找到直接相關控制變因,整體而言,明顯發生二氧化碳栓塞的約有4%,而持續以經食道超音波監控下腔靜脈有助於早期發現及預防嚴重二氧化碳栓塞,而這也是這項手術技術首次被報導的重要的合併症。 接著我們探討二氧化碳栓塞的發生是否會隨著二氧化碳充氣壓力的降低而減少,在498個進行心臟不停跳冠狀動脈繞道手術的病患中,隨機分為高壓(15 mmHg)與低壓組(12 mmHg),並以經食道超音波來監控下腔靜脈氣泡的出現,結果發現,高壓組受試者的二氧化碳栓塞率(13.3%)明顯高於低壓組(6.5%,p<0.05),由此推論,二氧化碳栓塞可因二氧化碳充氣壓力的降低而減少;再次證明術中持續使用經食道超音波監控能幫助減少大量二氧化碳栓塞的發生風險,這兩項研究中二氧化碳栓塞的發生率,也有明顯的下降,這也說明了手術的經驗和技術的累積可以降低這種合併症。 第二部分的研究,是希望了解內視鏡大隱靜脈摘取手術對內皮細胞的影響,因為到目前為此,並沒有此項手術長期暢通率的報告,我們希望藉由研究內皮細胞型態與功能性分析,間接得知可能對長期暢通率的影響,我們先以20對大隱靜脈的標本進行內皮細胞上CD31表現量之評估,CD31是內皮細胞上一個重要的標誌,CD31的存在與否代表內皮細胞的健在,結果顯示CD31在傳統大隱靜脈摘取手術的這一個族群與微創手術的族群相比有顯著的減少的趨勢,這給我們很大的鼓勵,代表新的微創的手術可以保存更多內皮細胞的完整性;此外,我們進行內皮細胞功能的研究,針對蛋白質分析,共有22對大隱靜脈的標本進行endothelial nitric oxide synthase(eNOS)、endothelin-1(ET-1)、和cyclooxygenase-2(COX-2)三種蛋白質的定量,這三種蛋白質是一般認為對內皮細胞的功能、血小板的凝聚、血管的舒張與收縮扮演相當重要的角色,傳統手術組的濃度分別為302.87±128.8、1.84±0.1、0.59±0.0 pg/mg protein而內視鏡組的濃度則是286.94±111.0、4.48±0.3、0.30±0.0 pg/mg protein,研究結果顯示這三種分子之蛋白質含量在不同手術方式所摘取的大隱靜脈並沒有明顯的差別,針對這項結果我們的想法是,蛋白質的形成,從訊號傳遞到基因的表現需要一定的時間,甚至長過我們手術的時間,於是我們更深入針對上游RNA層次作探討,共有26對大隱靜脈的標本進行eNOS、ET-1、COX-2 RNA的定量,結果顯示eNOS和COX-2的RNA在兩種不同手術所得到的大隱靜脈的標本的表現量並沒有差異(eNOS、COX-2在傳統手術分別是15.4±7.5、12.6±6.9;在內視鏡手術分別是與17.1±19.5、10.9±6.9),但ET-1 RNA在傳統手術方式的表現量卻高於內視鏡手術的表現量(16.3±6.7與8.79±4.1),且具有統計學上顯著的意義(p=0.00035)。從形態及功能性研究,我們可以說,利用微創手術摘取大隱靜脈與傳統方式並沒有差別。然而,在未來,除了透過臨床診斷的方法外,我們也預計進行大隱靜脈在短期承受動脈壓力之後所產生變化的相關研究,期望能應用於預測血管的長期暢通率,以提供更直接明確的佐證。 微創心臟手術是一條艱辛又遙遠的路,我期望藉由這些年的經驗與大家分享,並提供後學者一個較清楚的方向,以期造福更多病患。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T20:48:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-D89421102-1.pdf: 2155096 bytes, checksum: ced71ea0742a195d11dd2634c2b27315 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 中文摘要 1
第二章 緒論 3 第一節 冠狀動脈繞道的微創手術 5 第二節 不停跳的冠狀動脈繞道手術 7 第三節 內視鏡輔助微創冠狀動脈繞道手術 10 第四節 使用內視鏡摘取橈動脈進行冠狀動脈繞道手術 13 第五節 內視鏡大隱靜脈摘取術 18 第六節 內視鏡大隱靜脈摘取手術於臨床上的優缺點 22 第三章 研究方法與材料 24 第一節 如何減少二氧化碳栓塞 24 (一) 二氧化碳栓塞在進行內視鏡摘取大隱靜脈手術時的影響及嚴重性 24 (二) 二氧化碳栓塞與充氣壓力之關連 27 第二節 內視鏡大隱靜脈摘取手術對內皮細胞的影響 28 (一) 以CD31進行血管內皮形態的研究 30 (二) 以血管內皮中endothelial nitric oxide synthase(eNOS)、endothelin-1(ET-1)、和cyclooxygenase-2(COX-2)進行血管內皮功能的研究 31 (三) 儀器設備 49 第四章 結果 50 第一節 如何減少二氧化碳栓塞 50 (一) 二氧化碳栓塞在進行內視鏡摘取大隱靜脈手術時的影響及嚴重性 50 (二) 二氧化碳栓塞與充氣壓力之關連 53 第二節 內視鏡大隱靜脈摘取手術對內皮細胞的影響 54 (一) 以CD31進行血管內皮形態的研究 54 (二) 以血管內皮中endothelial nitric oxide synthase(eNOS)、endothelin-1(ET-1)、和cyclooxygenase-2(COX-2)進行血管內皮功能的研究 56 第五章 討論 59 第一節 如何減少二氧化碳栓塞 59 (一) 二氧化碳栓塞在進行內視鏡摘取大隱靜脈手術時的影響及嚴重性 59 (二) 二氧化碳栓塞與充氣壓力之關連 61 第二節 內視鏡大隱靜脈摘取手術對內皮細胞的影響 63 第六章 展望 67 第七章 論文英文簡述 71 第八章 參考文獻 78 第九章 附錄 85 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 內視鏡大隱靜脈摘取術臨床上的優缺點—技巧的演進與內皮細胞研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Clinical Advantages and Disadvantages of
Endoscopic Saphenous Vein Harvest – Technique Refinement and Study of Endothelial Function | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 楊友任,江福田,王水深,楊偉勛(Wei-Shiung Yang),蔡有光 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 冠狀動脈繞道手術,內視鏡大隱靜脈摘取,內皮細胞,二氧化碳栓塞,微創手術, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Coronary artery bypass grafting,Endoscopic vein harvest,Endothelium,Carbon Dioxide Embolism,Minimally invasive surgery, | en |
dc.relation.page | 88 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2008-07-01 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 臨床醫學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 臨床醫學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-97-1.pdf | 2.1 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。