Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 理學院
  3. 心理學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/98995
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor黃從仁zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorTsung-Ren Huangen
dc.contributor.author沈家齊zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorChia-Chi Shenen
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-20T16:35:03Z-
dc.date.available2025-08-21-
dc.date.copyright2025-08-20-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.date.submitted2025-08-15-
dc.identifier.citationAzimi, S., Popa, C.-G., & Cucić, T. (2020). Improving Students Performance in Small-Scale Online Courses—A Machine Learning-Based Intervention. International Journal of Learning Analytics and Artificial Intelligence for Education (iJAI), 2(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijai.v2i2.19371
Bahrick, H. P., Bahrick, L. E., Bahrick, A. S., & Bahrick, P. E. (1993). Maintenance of Foreign Language Vocabulary and the Spacing Effect. Psychological Science, 4(5), 316–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00571.x
Bélanger, P., & Tuijnman, A. (1997). New patterns of adult learning: A six-country comparative study (1st ed). Pergamon ; Unesco Institute for Education. Carvalho, P. F., Sana, F., & Yan, V. X. (2020). Self-regulated spacing in a massive open online course is related to better learning. Npj Science of Learning, 5(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-020-0061-1
Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 354–380. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354
Chin, J. M.-C., Lin, H.-C., & Chen, C.-W. (2022). Homework and learning achievements: How much homework is enough? Educational Studies, 48(3), 408–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1766423
Cooper, H., Robinson, J. C., & Patall, E. A. (2006). Does Homework Improve Academic Achievement? A Synthesis of Research, 1987–2003. Review of Educational Research, 4276(1), 1–62. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076001001
Credé, M., Roch, S. G., & Kieszczynka, U. M. (2010). Class Attendance in College: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Relationship of Class Attendance With Grades and Student Characteristics. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 272–295. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310362998
Eren, O., & Henderson, D. J. (2006). The Impact of Homework on Student Achievement. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.917447
Eren, O., & Henderson, D. J. (2011). Are we wasting our children’s time by giving them more homework? Economics of Education Review, 30(5), 950–961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.03.011
Figueroa-Cañas, J., & Sancho-Vinuesa, T. (2020). Early Prediction of Dropout and Final Exam Performance in an Online Statistics Course. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje, 15(2), 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2020.2987727
Grodner, A., & Rupp, N. G. (2011). The Role of Homework in Student Learning Outcomes: Evidence from a Field Experiment (SSRN Scholarly Paper 1892173). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1892173
Guo, L., Li, J., Xu, Z., Hu, X., Liu, C., Xing, X., Li, X., White, H., & Yang, K. (2024). The relationship between homework time and academic performance among K-12: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 20(3), e1431. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1431
Hadwin, A. F., Nesbit, J. C., Jamieson-Noel, D., Code, J., & Winne, P. H. (2007). Examining trace data to explore self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 2(2), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-007-9016-7
Hillman, D. C. A., Willis, D. J., & Gunawardena, C. N. (1994). Learner‐interface interaction 43 in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649409526853
Jacoby, L. L. (1978). On interpreting the effects of repetition: Solving a problem versus remembering a solution. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17(6), 649–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(78)90393-6
Johnson, G. M. (2005). Student Alienation, Academic Achievement, and WebCT Use. Educational Technology & Society, 8(2), 179–189.
Joksimović, S., Poquet, O., Kovanović, V., Dowell, N., Mills, C., Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Graesser, A., & Brooks, C. A. (2018). How Do We Model Learning at Scale? A Systematic Review of Research on MOOCs. Review of Educational Research, 88, 43–86. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317740335
Kim, S. K., & Webb, S. (2022). The Effects of Spaced Practice on Second Language Learning: A Meta-Analysis. Language Learning, 72(1), 269–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12479
Kizilcec, R. F., & Halawa, S. (2015). Attrition and Achievement Gaps in Online Learning. Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1145/2724660.2724680
Kizilcec, R. F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Maldonado, J. J. (2017). Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers & Education, 104, 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001
Kuzilek, J., Hlosta, M., & Zdrahal, Z. (2017). Open University Learning Analytics dataset. Scientific Data, 4(1), 170171. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.171
Latif, E., & Miles, S. (2020). The Impact of Assignments and Quizzes on Exam Grades: A Difference-in-Difference Approach. Journal of Statistics Education, 28(3), 289–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2020.1807429
Li, J., & Xue, E. (2023). Dynamic Interaction between Student Learning Behaviour and Learning Environment: Meta-Analysis of Student Engagement and Its Influencing Factors. Behavioral Sciences, 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13010059
Macfadyen, L. P., & Dawson, S. (2010). Mining LMS data to develop an “early warning system” for educators: A proof of concept. Computers & Education, 54(2), 588–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.008
McDaniel, M. A., Fadler, C. L., & Pashler, H. (2013). Effects of spaced versus massed training in function learning: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(5), 1417–1432. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032184
Misanchuk, E. R., & Schwier, R. A. (1992). Representing Interactive Multimedia and Hypermedia Audit Trails. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 1(3), 355–372.
Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659
Morris, L. V., Finnegan, C., & Wu, S.-S. (2005). Tracking student behavior, persistence, and achievement in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(3), 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.06.009
Núñez, J. C., Suárez, N., Cerezo, R., González-Pienda, J., Rosário, P., Mourão, R., & Valle, A. (2015). Homework and academic achievement across Spanish Compulsory Education. Educational Psychology, 35(6), 726–746. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.817537
Qiu, F., Zhang, G., Sheng, X., Jiang, L., Zhu, L., Xiang, Q., Jiang, B., & Chen, P.-K. (2022). Predicting students’ performance in e-learning using learning process and behaviour data. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 453. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03867-8
Reynolds, J. H., & Glaser, R. (1964). Effects of repetition and spaced review upon retention of a complex learning task. Journal of Educational Psychology, 55(5), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040734
Schutte, G. M., Duhon, G. J., Solomon, B. G., Poncy, B. C., Moore, K., & Story, B. (2015). A comparative analysis of massed vs. Distributed practice on basic math fact fluency growth rates. Journal of School Psychology, 53(2), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2014.12.003
Sun, Y. (2015). Characteristics of on-line learning behaviour in distance education. China Educ. Technol, 8, 64–71.
Tawil, S., & Locatelli, R. (2015). Rethinking education: Towards a global common good? https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000232555
Vlach, H. A., Kaul, M., Hosch, A., & Lazaroff, E. (2022). Attending less and forgetting more: Dynamics of simultaneous, massed, and spaced presentations in science concept
learning. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 11(3), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.10.007
Wang, A. Y., & Newlin, M. H. (2002). Predictors of web-student performance: The role of self-efficacy and reasons for taking an on-line class. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(2), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(01)00042-5
Wang, Y., Zuo, M., He, X., & Wang, Z. (2025). Exploring Students Online Learning Behavioral Engagement in University: Factors, Academic Performance and Their Relationship. Behavioral Sciences, 15(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15010078
Wang, Z., Koprinska, I., & Jeffries, B. (2024). Interpretable Methods for Early Prediction of Student Performance in Programming Courses. A. M. Olney, I.-A. Chounta, Z. Liu, O. C. Santos, & I. I. Bittencourt , Artificial Intelligence in Education. Posters and Late
Breaking Results, Workshops and Tutorials, Industry and Innovation Tracks, Practitioners, Doctoral Consortium and Blue Sky (115–123). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64312-5_14
Wu, D., Li, H., Zhu, S., Yang, H. H., Bai, J., Zhao, J., & Yang, K. (2024). Primary students’ online homework completion and learning achievement. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(8), 4469–4483. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2201343
Ye, M., Sheng, X., Lu, Y., Zhang, G., Chen, H., Jiang, B., Zou, S., & Dai, L. (2022). SA-FEM: Combined Feature Selection and Feature Fusion for Students’ Performance Prediction. Sensors, 22(22), Article 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22228838
You, J. W. (2016). Identifying significant indicators using LMS data to predict course achievement in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.11.003
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/98995-
dc.description.abstract本研究旨在深入探討影響線上學習成效的關鍵指標,研究目的在於綜合性探討關於過去研究中常見學習活動、行為及著名的間隔效應(Spacing Effect)與學生學業表現的關聯。本研究進一步將學習行為分為「資源瀏覽行為」(Navigation)、「知識獲取行為」(Input)與「知識應用行為」(Output),以求更細緻地探討這些行為的次數、行為分布及學習間隔對學業成效的影響。
首先,研究發現學生的早期表現,特別是在課程初期和中期的作業得分,對最終成績具有高度預測力,其影響力與課程後期的得分相當,強調在遠距學習環境中進行早期干預的必要性。
另外,結果顯示學習行為的間隔對學業成效具有顯著的預測能力。其中,作業完成率及知識獲取行為的點擊頻率為負向因子,而知識獲取行為次數的波動程度以及知識運用行為的間隔天數則呈現正向影響,顯示高成效學生可能展現出更具策略性的學習行為,諸如適當的延長學習行為間隔、選擇性的作業繳交和資源投入。此外,資源瀏覽行為的平均間隔天數過長則顯示出負向預測作用,推測是因瀏覽行為實屬策略規劃行為的範疇,而非實質的學習活動,因此同樣體現了規劃學習策略之行為對最終成績表現的重要性。
總體而言,本研究呼籲針對線上學習的早期預警方法以及學生策略規劃行為的關注,強調未來研究應側重遠距教學場域的學習策略,並建議在教學實踐中加強對學習行為的監測與分析。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to explore the key indicators influencing online learning outcomes by comprehensively analyzing the relationship between common learning activities, behaviors, and the well-known Spacing Effect, as discussed in previous research. To further investigate these relationships, the study categorizes learning behaviors into "Navigation," "Input," and "Output" behaviors, examining the frequency, distribution, and spacing intervals of these behaviors and their impact on academic performance.
The findings reveal that students' early performance, particularly in the initial and middle stages of the course, strongly predicts their final grades, with its predictive power comparable to that of late-stage performance. This underscores the importance of early intervention in online learning environments. Specifically, early performance serves as an effective early warning indicator, enabling the identification of at-risk students for timely support.
Moreover, the study shows that the spacing of learning behaviors significantly predicts academic performance. Lower task completion rates may correlate with better performance, while longer intervals between Output behaviors and greater fluctuations in Input behaviors positively affect learning results. High-performing students may exhibit more strategic learning behaviors, such as maintaining appropriate learning intervals, selectively submitting tasks, and investing focused effort. On the other hand, excessively long intervals between Navigation behaviors negatively predict performance, suggesting that such behaviors, more related to learning strategy planning than actual learning, are important for academic success.
Overall, this study emphasizes the need for early warning systems and attention to learning strategies in online learning environments, suggesting that future research should focus on exploring learning strategies in distance education and improving the monitoring and analysis of learning behaviors.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-08-20T16:35:03Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2025-08-20T16:35:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機 6
第三節 研究目的 9
第二章 研究方法 10
第一節 資料集 10
第二節 資料前處理與樣本篩選 15
第三節 建模分析. 17
第三章 研究結果 22
第一節 資料分布 22
第二節 混合效應模型 24
第三節 類神經網路模型 29
第四章 綜合討論 35
第一節 研究發現與貢獻 35
第二節 研究限制 37
第三節 未來展望 39
第四節 研究結論 40
參考文獻 42
附錄 48
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subject線上學習zh_TW
dc.subject學習成效zh_TW
dc.subject學習行為zh_TW
dc.subject早期干預zh_TW
dc.subject學習分析zh_TW
dc.subject混合效應模型zh_TW
dc.subject類神經網路zh_TW
dc.subject間隔效應zh_TW
dc.subject學習策略zh_TW
dc.subjectlearning behavioren
dc.subjectOnline learningen
dc.subjectlearning strategiesen
dc.subjectearly interventionen
dc.subjectSpacing Effecten
dc.subjectlearning outcomesen
dc.title線上學習成效的關鍵指標zh_TW
dc.titleLeading Indicators of Online Learning Performanceen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear113-2-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee王雅鈴;蔡欣穆zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeYa-Ling Wang;Hsin-Mu Tsaien
dc.subject.keyword線上學習,學習成效,學習行為,早期干預,學習分析,混合效應模型,類神經網路,間隔效應,學習策略,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordOnline learning,learning outcomes,learning behavior,Spacing Effect,early intervention,learning strategies,en
dc.relation.page48-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202504281-
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)-
dc.date.accepted2025-08-18-
dc.contributor.author-college理學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept心理學系-
dc.date.embargo-lift2025-08-21-
顯示於系所單位:心理學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-113-2.pdf1.26 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved