Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 理學院
  3. 地理環境資源學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/98935
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor郭巧玲zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorChiao-Ling Kuoen
dc.contributor.author顏廷龍zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorTing-Long Yanen
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-20T16:20:54Z-
dc.date.available2025-08-21-
dc.date.copyright2025-08-20-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.date.submitted2025-08-14-
dc.identifier.citationAnderson, P., Fernando, B., Johnson, M., & Gould, S. (2016). Spice: Semantic propositional image caption evaluation. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1607.08822
Arguello, M., Des, J., Fernandez-Prieto, M. J., Perez, R., & Lekkas, S. (2011). An ontology-based approach to natural language generation from coded data in electronic health records. 2011 UKSim 5th European Symposium on Computer Modeling and Simulation, 366–371. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMS.2011.47
Borgo, S., Ferrario, R., Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Masolo, C., Porello, D., Sanfilippo, E. M., & Vieu, L. (2022). Dolce: A descriptive ontology for linguistic and cognitive engineering1 (S. Borgo, A. Galton, & O. Kutz, Eds.). Applied Ontology, 17(1), 45–69. https://doi.org/10.3233/ao-210259
Cascallar-Fuentes, A., Gallego-Fernández, J., Ramos-Soto, A., Saunders-Estévez, A., & Bugarín-Diz, A. (2022). Automatic generation of textual descriptions in data-to-text systems using a fuzzy temporal ontology: Application in air quality index dataseries. Applied Soft Computing, 119, 108612. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2022.108612
Chen, H., Winter, S., & Vasardani, M. (2018). Georeferencing places from collective hu- man descriptions using place graphs. Journal of Spatial Information Science, 2018. https://doi.org/10.5311/JOSIS.2018.17.417
Cicconeto, F., Vieira, L. V., Abel, M., Alvarenga, R. d. S., Carbonera, J. L., & Garcia, L. F. (2022). Georeservoir: An ontology for deep-marine depositional system geometry description. Computers & Geosciences, 159, 105005. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2021.105005
ESRI. (2025). Reversegeocode. https ://developers.arcgis.com/rest/geocode/reverse-geocode/
Fernández-López, M., Gomez-Perez, A., & Juristo, N. (1997). Methontology: From ontological art towards ontological engineering. Engineering Workshop on Ontological Engineering (AAAI97).
Fonseca, F. T., Egenhofer, M. J., Agouris, P., & Câmara, G. (2002). Using ontologies for integrated geographic information systems. Transactions in GIS, 6(3), 231–257. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9671.00109
Gao, S. (2022). Towards place-based gis. In B. Li, X. Shi, A. X. Zhu, C. Wang, & H. Lin (Eds.), New thinking in giscience (pp. 51–58). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3816-0_6
Gao, S., Janowicz, K., Montello, D. R., Hu, Y., Yang, J.-A., McKenzie, G., Ju, Y., Gong, L., Adams, B., & Yan, B. (2017). A data-synthesis-driven method for detecting and extracting vague cognitive regions. International Journal of Geographical In- formation Science, 31(6), 1245–1271. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2016.1273357
Goldberg, D. W., Wilson, J. P., & Knoblock, C. A. (2009). Extracting geographic features from the internet to automatically build detailed regional gazetteers. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 23(1), 93–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810802577262
Google. (2025). Google reverse geocoding. https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/javascript/examples/geocoding-reverse
Goyal, R. K., & Egenhofer, M. J. (2014). The direction-relation matrix :a representation for direction relations between extended spatial objects. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:17502171
Guarino, N., Oberle, D., & Staab, S. (2009). What is an ontology? https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92673-3_0
Gustafson, P. E. R. (2001). Meanings of place: Everyday experience and theoretical conceptualizations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2000.0185
Hahmann, T., & Stephen, S. (2018). Using a hydro-reference ontology to provide improved computer-interpretable semantics for the groundwater markup language (gwml2). International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 32(6), 1138–1171. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2018.1443751
Hall, M. M., & Jones, C. B. (2022). Generating geographical location descriptions with spatial templates: A salient toponym driven approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 36(1), 55–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2021.1913498
Hamzei, E., Winter, S., & Tomko, M. (2019). Place facets: A systematic literature review. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 20, 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2019.1688332
Hu, R., Dong, S., Zhao, Y., Hu, H., & Li, Z. (2013). Assessing potential spatial accessibility of health services in rural china: A case study of donghai county. International Journal for Equity in Health, 12(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-12-35
Huang, C.-R. (1998). Introduction to academia sinica balanced corpus.
Huang, Y., Yuan, M., Sheng, Y., Min, X., & Cao, Y. (2019). Using geographic ontologies and geo-characterization to represent geographic scenarios. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 8(12), 566. https://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/8/12/566
Janowicz, K., Schade, S., Bröring, A., Keßler, C., Maué, P., & Stasch, C. (2010). Semantic enablement for spatial data infrastructures. Transactions in GIS, 14(2), 111–129. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9671.2010.01186.x
Ji, Y., Gao, S., Nie, Y., Majić, I., & Janowicz, K. (2025). Foundation models for geospatial reasoning: Assessing the capabilities of large language models in understanding geometries and topological spatial relations. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 0(0), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2025.2511227
Kounadi, O., Lampoltshammer, T. J., Leitner, M., & Heistracher, T. (2013). Accuracy and privacy aspects in free online reverse geocoding services. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 40(2), 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2013.777138
Kuhn, W. (2012). Core concepts of spatial information for transdisciplinary research. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26(12), 2267–2276. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2012.722637
Latif, S., & Beck, F. (2019). Interactive map reports summarizing bivariate geographic data. Visual Informatics, 3(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visinf.2019.03.004
Levinson, S. (2003). Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity, Vol. 5. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613609
Liu, K., Tang, M., Liu, R., & Qin, Y. (2017). Geography’s“world view”: The ontological issues of geography. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 27(12), 1541–1555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-017-1451-z
Lopez, A., & Bosco, A. (2022). Distortions in spatial mental representation affect sketch maps in young adults. Neurology International, 14, 771–783. https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint14040064
Lopez-Pellicer, F. J., Lacasta, J., Florczyk, A., Nogueras-Iso, J., & Zarazaga-Soria, F. J. (2012). An ontology for the representation of spatiotemporal jurisdictional domains in information retrieval systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26(4), 579–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2011.599811
Lynch, K. (1964). The image of the city. MIT Press. https://books.google.com.tw/books?id=NL74DwAAQBAJ
Merriam-Webster. (2025a). Location. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/location
Merriam-Webster. (2025b). Preposition. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/preposition
OpenStreetMap. (2025). Nominatim. https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/search.html
Praschl, C., Stradner, M. F., Ono, Y., & Zwettler, G. A. (2022). Towards an automated system for reverse geocoding of aerial photographs. https://doi.org/https://www.doi.org/10.24132/CSRN.3201.37
Purves, R. S., Winter, S., & Kuhn, W. (2019). Places in information science. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(11), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24194
Sun, K., Zhu, Y., Pan, P., Hou, Z., Wang, D., Li, W., & Song, J. (2019). Geospatial data ontology: The semantic foundation of geospatial data integration and sharing. Big Earth Data, 3(3), 269–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/20964471.2019.1661662
Talmy, L. (1983). How language structures space. In H. L. Pick & L. P. Acredolo (Eds.), Spatial orientation: Theory, research, and application (pp. 225–282). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9325-6_11
Ursini, F.-A., Long, H., & Zhang, Y. (2020). (un)bounded spatial categories in mandarin. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique, 65, 119–133.
Ursini, F.-A., Rao, Q., & Zhang, Y. S. (2021). The polysemy and hyponymy of mandarin spatial prepositions and localisers: Building semantic maps from the ground up. Frontiers in Communication, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.724143
Ye, P., Zhang, X., Zhang, C., & Dang, Y. (2022). Positioning localities for vague spatial location description: A supervaluation semantics approach. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11010068
內政部. (2014). 地形資料分類架構. 內政部. https://bmap-nlsc.moi.gov.tw/contentPage.aspx?id=20200422183728277&tp=c
內政部. (2023). 全國門牌地址定位服務. https://map.tgos.tw/TGOSCloudMap?addr=%E5%8F%B0%E5%8C%97%E5%B8%82%E4%BF%A1%E7%BE%A9%E5%8D%80%E5%B8%82%E5%BA%9C%E8%B7%AF45%E8%99%9F
國家教育研究院. (2021). 位置. https://dict.concised.moe.edu.tw/dictView.jsp?ID=43551
廣義知網. (2025). 廣義知網. https://ckip.iis.sinica.edu.tw/project/ehownet
張子瑩, 林郁芳, 吳上煜, 陳俊元, & 鍾佩蓉. (2016). 臺灣災害公眾告警系統之細胞廣播服務推動現況.
梁瑀庭 & 何萬順. (2023). 漢語方位詞的詞類與詞態屬性. 漢學研究 , 41(1), 297–320.
警察廣播電臺. (2021). 關於警廣. https://www.pbs.npa.gov.tw/ch/app/artwebsite/view?module=artwebsite%5C&id=1548%5C&serno=e04f8549-f818-4e15-babb-2d1aa15083ac
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/98935-
dc.description.abstract位置描述(Location description)係人們在日常對話中位置與地點的自然語言表達,其指稱地址或地名等專有名詞,或在與空間參考物產生關係下,由人類空間認知理解環境後指涉的絕對或相對位置。然而,在地理資訊系統(Geographic Information System, GIS)中多以幾何坐標結合屬性資料儲存和呈現位置,較少觸及位置概念的表達,亦未充分考量使用者的空間認知與情境解讀。
本研究旨在拓展基於坐標之空間資料與空間關係的位置與地點表達,著重在結合知識本體(ontology)建立空間語意,並藉由語意網規則語言(Semantic Web Rule Language, SWRL)與推論機制產生自然語言文字,使得所查詢之各類圖徵(feature)皆可具有適切的位置描述。研究方法運用知識本體建構空間圖徵與其性質和圖徵間空間關係的形式化(formalization)語意表徵結果,以量化、推論與產生不同圖徵類型與個人位置與地點之描述,使得圖徵位置得以依據不同情境、空間尺度與重要性進行語意調整與表達。
在案例研究上,選擇交通及災防情境驗證本研究機制的可行性與適切性,提供實際應用於導航、道路救災、即時路況廣播或災防告警細胞廣播訊息等場域。研究結果顯示本研究機制產生位置描述,在語意涵蓋率表現較目前人工撰寫的描述較佳,同時對於地理實體的理解也較同為計算機產生的大型語言模型佳。本研究貢獻在於提升多維幾何與基於情境的位置語意表達,並建立結合GIS進行空間分析與語意推論的整合性框架,期拓展人們使用空間資料和解讀空間資訊之有效途徑並產生實務應用價值。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractA location description denotes the use of natural language to express spatial positions in human communication. It encompasses not only proper nouns (such as addresses or place names), but also spatial concepts derived from spatial cognition related to reference objects. However, in computational environments such as Geographic Information Systems, spatial data and their relationships are primarily represented as geographically referenced values, i.e., coordinates enriched metadata (attributes), which often lack flexible semantic representations for contextual interpretation between spatial objects.
This study addresses this gap by integrating ontologies to construct spatial semantics and generate location descriptions through semantic web rule language (SWRL). The proposed framework formalizes spatial features and relationships embedded in coordinate-based and multi-dimensional spatial data, enabling the quantification, inference, and generation of context-aware descriptions across different spatial scales and levels of prominence.
In this case study, the traffic and disaster prevention scenario is selected to verify the feasibility and applicability of the proposed mechanism. The framework is designed to support real-world applications such as navigation, emergency road response, real-time traffic broadcasting, and disaster alert cell broadcast messaging.This study contributes to enhancing the semantic representation of location by considering various spatial scales and contextual factors within spatial data. The results show that the location descriptions generated by the proposed mechanism outperform manually written descriptions in terms of semantic coverage, and also demonstrate a better understanding of geographic entities compared to large language models likewise generated by computers. Furthermore, it establishes an integrated framework that combines GIS-based spatial analysis with semantic reasoning, aiming to expand effective ways for users to interpret and utilize spatial information and thereby generate practical value.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-08-20T16:20:54Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2025-08-20T16:20:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents謝辭 I
中文摘要 II
英文摘要 III
目次 V
圖次 VIII
表次 X
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 ................................................................................. 2
1.2 研究動機與問題 ....................................................................... 4
1.3 章節安排 ................................................................................. 6
第二章 文獻回顧 8
2.1 位置描述的語言形式................................................................. 8
2.2 地理空間的語意 ....................................................................... 10
2.3 知識本體與自然語言產生 .......................................................... 12
2.4 語意式位置描述的發展 ............................................................. 13
第三章 研究方法 15
3.1 位置描述語意 (O-SLD) 三層式架構設計 ...................................... 16
3.2 位置描述知識本體 (LocD Ontology) ............................................ 17
3.2.1 上層知識本體................................................................. 18
3.2.1.1 Descriptive Ontology for Linguistic and Cognitive Engineering (DOLCE) ......................................... 19
3.2.1.2 GeoSPARQL Ontology ........................................ 21
3.2.1.3 Extended-HowNet Ontology (E-HowNet Ontology) ... 22
3.2.2 圖徵及性質 .................................................................... 23
3.2.2.1 圖徵性質:類型 ................................................ 26
3.2.2.2 空間操作 .......................................................... 28
3.2.3 位置描述與空間概念 ....................................................... 29
3.2.3.1 詞意概念與詞彙結構 .......................................... 29
3.2.3.2 空間介詞與方位詞之實例 ................................... 31
3.2.3.3 空間介詞與方位詞之性質 ................................... 35
3.3 空間認知三階段規則................................................................. 36
3.3.1 情境影響參考物選擇 ....................................................... 37
3.3.2 資料層到語意層 ............................................................. 37
3.3.3 語意層到自然語言層 ....................................................... 39
3.4 情境分析 ................................................................................. 39
3.4.1 LocD 知識本體擴展 ........................................................ 40
3.4.2 情境關聯之規則定義 ....................................................... 42
3.4.3 樣板設計 ....................................................................... 43
3.5 評估方法 ................................................................................. 44
第四章 研究成果 46
4.1 研究區與材料 .......................................................................... 46
4.2 系統環境與開發工具................................................................. 48
4.3 實作案例 ................................................................................. 52
4.3.1 點範例:在中山高速公路北上12.1公里附近(汐止系統交流道外) .................................................................... 53
4.3.2 線範例:在台灣東部沿岸 ................................................ 56
4.3.3 面範例:在屏東縣恆春鎮、車城鄉和牡丹鄉四重溪下游(牡丹水庫下游)............................................................... 60
4.3.4 多重面範例:在新北市烏來區和新店區(南勢溪河畔)和在新北市石碇區(石碇溪河畔) .......................................... 63
4.4 評估結果與討論 ....................................................................... 67
4.4.1 依據幾何類型分析 .......................................................... 83
4.4.2 依據情境分析................................................................. 85
4.5 研究限制 ................................................................................. 87
第五章 結論與未來展望 89
參考文獻 90
附錄 95
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subject空間語意zh_TW
dc.subject位置描述zh_TW
dc.subject空間認知zh_TW
dc.subject語意網規則語言 (Semantic Web Rule Language)zh_TW
dc.subject知識本體 (Ontology)zh_TW
dc.subjectlocation descriptionen
dc.subjectspatial semanticsen
dc.subjectspatial cognitionen
dc.subjectSemantic Web Rule Languageen
dc.subjectOntologyen
dc.title基於知識本體之語意式位置描述zh_TW
dc.titleThe Ontology-based Semantic Location Descriptionen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear113-2-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.coadvisor林楨家zh_TW
dc.contributor.coadvisorJen-Jia Linen
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee張子瑩;林峰田zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeTzu-Yin Chang;Feng-Tyan Linen
dc.subject.keyword位置描述,空間語意,知識本體 (Ontology),語意網規則語言 (Semantic Web Rule Language),空間認知,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordlocation description,spatial semantics,Ontology,Semantic Web Rule Language,spatial cognition,en
dc.relation.page112-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202504377-
dc.rights.note同意授權(限校園內公開)-
dc.date.accepted2025-08-15-
dc.contributor.author-college理學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept地理環境資源學系-
dc.date.embargo-lift2030-08-11-
顯示於系所單位:地理環境資源學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-113-2.pdf
  未授權公開取用
27.74 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved