Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 社會科學院
  3. 政治學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/98790
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor張佑宗zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorYu-tzung Changen
dc.contributor.author蕭宏達zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorHong-Da Siauen
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-19T16:12:51Z-
dc.date.available2025-08-20-
dc.date.copyright2025-08-19-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.date.submitted2025-08-12-
dc.identifier.citationAstro本地圈(2023)。穆斯林部長佔居多仍被批評 黃進發:團結政府無法一直滿足馬來人。5月25日。https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_5v2pFVdAI
李鳳玉(2021)。政府體制、選舉制度和選舉時程—政治制度如何影響國會大選中的策略投票。臺灣民主季刊,18(3),1-47。
東方日報(2020)。倒數第二低 華裔軍人僅佔0.38%。9月16日。https://www.orientaldaily.com.my/news/nation/2020/09/16/363926
林友順(2014)。大馬內閣改組馬華重入閣 (林友順)。亞洲週刊,7月7日。https://www.yzzk.com/article/details/%E7%89%B9%E7%A8%BF/2014-27/1404359916248/%E5%A4%A7%E9%A6%AC%E5%85%A7%E9%96%A3%E6%94%B9%E7%B5%84%E9%A6%AC%E8%8F%AF%E9%87%8D%E5%85%A5%E9%96%A3
林安琪(2021)。全國頒布緊急狀態 國會將陷入停擺。東方日報,1月12日。https://www.orientaldaily.com.my/news/nation/2021/01/12/386229
星洲日報(2019)。巫伊簽《全民共識憲章》 大團結加強土著議程。9月14日。https://www.sinchew.com.my/news/20190914/nation/2881028
南洋商報(2023)。哈迪:巫統議員若不滿可加入國盟 聯手推翻團結政府。11月23日。https://www.enanyang.my/news/20250711/Nation/921260
侯顯佳(2021)。國會特別會議週一召開 無國家元首致詞及議案辯論。東方日報,7月24日。https://www.orientaldaily.com.my/news/nation/2021/07/24/426326
孫采薇(2016)。選區分配與族群投票:從馬來西亞 2013 年國會大 選評析馬國政黨輪替的瓶頸。政治學報,(61),57-85。
透視大馬(2023)。州選勝出推翻團結政府?陸兆福:國盟一廂情願。8月3日。https://www.themalaysianinsight.com/index.php/chinese/s/455400
游雅雯(2021)。在野黨的選舉策略與優勢政黨的敗選:伊斯蘭黨與2018年馬來西亞國會選舉的實證研究。選舉研究,28(1),149-189。
當今大馬(2015)。正式宣布民進黨不復存在 行動黨冀望打造新聯盟。6月16日。https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/302009
當今大馬(2018a)。「需給巫裔趕上的機會」,馬哈迪重申不簽ICERD。12月9日。https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/455358
當今大馬(2018b)。反ICERD集會聚8萬人,雨中提前結束。12月8日。https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/455245
當今大馬(2020)。三軍將配合警方巡邏,週日起監督民眾守限行令。3月20日。https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/515756
當今大馬(2023)。「它大贏也不會當首相大臣」,納茲裡駁行動黨威脅論。8月7日。https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/674745
聯合早報(2021)。安華暗示已準備好 與巫統合作推翻國盟政府。6月7日。https://www.zaobao.com.sg/news/sea/story20210607-1152876
聯合早報(2025)。避免互鬥 阿末扎希:巫統將與希盟合作參加大選。7月6日。https://www.zaobao.com.sg/news/sea/story20250706-7085923
蘇俊翔(2022)。以緊急狀態令抗疫 慕尤丁:疫情鬥爭甚於戰爭。聯合早報,1月16日。https://www.zaobao.com.sg/realtime/world/story20220116-1233622
Abdullah, W. J. (2019). The Mahathir effect in Malaysia’s 2018 election: The role of credible personalities in regime transitions. Democratization, 26(3), 521-536.
Alvarez, M., Cheibub, J. A., Limongi, F., & Przeworski, A. (1996). Classifying political regimes. Studies In Comparative International Development, 31(2), 3-36.
Anderson, C. J., Blais, A., Bowler, S., Donovan, T., & Listhaug, O. (2005). Losers, consent: Elections and democratic legitimacy. Oxford University Press.
Anderson, C. J., & Guillory, C. A. (1997). Political institutions and satisfaction with democracy: A cross-national analysis of consensus and majoritarian systems. The American Political Science Review, 91(1), 66-81.
Anderson, C. J., & LoTempio, A. J. (2002). Winning, losing and political trust in America. British Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 335-351.
Banducci, S. A., Donovan, T., & Karp, J. A. (2004). Minority representation, empowerment, and participation. The Journal of Politics, 66(2), 534-556.
Belge, C., & Karakoç, E. (2015). Minorities in the middle east: Ethnicity, religion, and support for authoritarianism. Political Research Quarterly, 68(2), 280-292.
Blais, A., & Gélineau, F. (2007). Winning, losing and satisfaction with democracy. Political Studies, 55(2), 425-441.
Bobo, L., & Gilliam, F. D. (1990). Race, sociopolitical participation, and black empowerment. American Political Science Review, 84(2), 377-393.
Bowler, S., & Donovan, T. (2007). Reasoning about institutional change: Winners, losers and support for electoral reforms. British Journal of Political Science, 37(3), 455-476.
Bratton, M., Mattes, R., & Gyimah-Boadi, E. (2005). Public opinion, democracy, and market reform in Africa. Cambridge University Press.
Ceka, B., & Magalhães, P. C. (2020). Do the rich and the poor have different conceptions of democracy? Socioeconomic status, inequality and the political status quo. Comparative Politics, 52(3), 383-412.
Chandra, K. (2005). Ethnic parties and democratic stability. Perspectives on Politics, 3(2), 235-252.
Chang, A., Chu, Y., & Welsh, B. (2013). Southeast Asia: Sources of regime support. Journal of Democracy, 24(2), 150-164.
Chang, Y., & Huang, O. (2022). Perceived inequality and democratic support: A close analysis from the Asian Barometer Survey. In M. Holm & R. S. Deese (Eds.), How democracy survives: Global challenges in the anthropocene (pp. 99-107). Routledge.
Claassen, C. (2020a). Does public support help democracy survive? American Journal of Political Science, 64(1), 118-134.
Claassen, C. (2020b). In the mood for democracy? Democratic support as thermostatic opinion. American Political Science Review, 114(1), 36-53.
Claassen, C., Ackermann, K., Bertsou, E., Borba, L., Carlin, R. E., Cavari, A., Dahlum, S., Gherghina, S., Hawkins, D., Lelkes, Y., Magalhães, P. C., Mattes, R., Meijers, M. J., Neundorf, A., Oross, D., Öztürk, A., Sarsfield, R., Self, D., Stanley, B., … Zechmeister, E. J. (2024). Conceptualizing and measuring support for democracy: A new approach. Comparative Political Studies, 58(6): 1171-1198.
Claassen, C., & Magalhães, P. C. (2022). Effective government and evaluations of democracy. Comparative Political Studies, 55(5), 869-894.
Constitute Project. (2022). Malaysia's constitution of 1957 with amendments through 2007. April 27. https://www.constituteproject.org/countries/Asia/Malaysia
Coppedge, M., Lindberg, S., Skaaning, S.-E., & Teorell, J. (2016). Measuring high level democratic principles using the V-Dem data. International Political Science Review, 37(5), 580-593.
Craig, S. C., Martinez, M. D., Gainous, J., & Kane, J. G. (2006). Winners, losers, and election context: Voter responses to the 2000 presidential election. Political Research Quarterly, 59(4), 579-592.
Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. Yale University Press.
Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic challenges, democratic choices: The erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford University Press.
Dettman, S. (2020). Authoritarian innovations and democratic reform in the “New Malaysia”. Democratization, 27(6), 1037-1052.
Dettman, S., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2024). Demographic structure and voting behaviour during democratization: Evidence from Malaysia’s 2022 election. Democratization, 31(1), 1-22.
Dowley, K. M., & Silver, B. D. (2002). Social capital, ethnicity and support for democracy in the post-communist states. Europe-Asia Studies, 54(4), 505-527.
Easton, D. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. John Wiley.
Easton, D. (1975). A re-assessment of the concept of political support. British Journal of Political Science, 5(4), 435-457.
Easton, D. (2012). Esquema para el análisis político (tercera edición). Amorrortu Editores.
Ehin, P. (2007). Political support in the baltic states, 1993-2004. Journal of Baltic Studies, 38(1), 1-20.
Enders, A. M., & Thornton, J. R. (2022). Racial resentment, electoral loss, and satisfaction with democracy among whites in the United States: 2004-2016. Political Behavior, 44(1), 389-410.
Fierro, J. (2022). Indigenous people, redistribution, and support for the political regime in Latin America. Acta Politica, 57(1), 52-72.
Fish, M. S., & Kroenig, M. (2006). Diversity, conflict and democracy: Some evidence from Eurasia and East Europe. Democratization, 13(5), 828-842.
Flesken, A., & Hartl, J. (2020). Ethnicity, inequality, and perceived electoral fairness. Social Science Research, 85, 102363.
Foa, R. S., & Mounk, Y. (2016). The danger of deconsolidation: The democratic disconnect. Journal of Democracy, 27(3), 5-17.
Girardin, L., Hunziker, P., Cederman, L.-E., Bormann, N.-C., Rüegger, S., & Vogt, M. (2015). GROWup - Geographical Research On War, Unified Platform. ETH Zurich. http://growup.ethz.ch/
Hajnal, Z. L. (2009). Who loses in American democracy? A count of votes demonstrates the limited representation of African Americans. American Political Science Review, 103(1), 37-57.
Hajnal, Z. L., & Horowitz, J. D. (2014). Racial winners and losers in American party politics. Perspectives on Politics, 12(1), 100-118.
Horowitz, D. L. (1985). Ethnic groups in conflict. University of California Press.
Horowitz, D. L. (1993). Democracy in divided societies. Journal of Democracy, 4(4), 18-38.
Houle, C. (2015). Ethnic inequality and the dismantling of democracy: A global analysis. World Politics, 67(3), 469-505.
Houle, C. (2018). Does ethnic voting harm democracy? Democratization, 25(5), 824-842.
Huang, K.-P. (2024). Social and partisan cleavages and the demand and supply of democracy. Journal of Asian Governance, 1(1), 69-99.
Huang, X., & Zuo, C. (2023). Economic inequality, distributive unfairness, and regime support in East Asia. Democratization, 30(2), 215-237.
Huhe, N., & Tang, M. (2017). Contingent instrumental and intrinsic support: Exploring regime support in Asia. Political Studies, 65(1), 161-178.
Huntington, S. P. (1991). The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. University of Oklahoma Press.
Inglehart, R. (2003). How solid is mass support for democracy-And how can we measure it? PS: Political Science & Politics, 36(1), 51-57.
Jensen, C., & Skaaning, S.-E. (2012). Modernization, ethnic fractionalization, and democracy. Democratization, 19(6), 1117-1137.
Jou, W. (2009). Political support from election losers in Asian democracies. Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 5(2), 145-175.
Jou, W., & Ooi, K. H. (2022). Political support in an ethnically divided society: A case study of Malaysia. Asian Journal of Political Science, 30(1), 61-81.
Klingemann, H. D. (1999). Mapping political support in the 1990s: A global analysis. In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government (pp. 31-56). Oxford University Press.
Lee, H.-A. (2024). Group‐based redistribution in Malaysia: Polarization, incoherence, stasis. Social Inclusion, 12.
Lee, H.-A., & Choong, C. (2019). Inequality in Malaysia: Empirical questions, structural changes, gender aspects. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 36(3), 329-354.
Lee, H.-A., & Khalid, M. A. (2020). Is inequality really declining in Malaysia? Journal of Contemporary Asia, 50(1), 14-35.
Leipziger, L. E. (2023). Ethnic inequality, democratic transitions, and democratic breakdowns: Investigating an asymmetrical relationship. The Journal of Politics, 86(1), 291-304.
Linde, J. (2012). Why feed the hand that bites you? Perceptions of procedural fairness and system support in post-communist democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 51(3), 410-434.
Linz, J. J., & Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and post-communist Europe. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69-105.
Lu, J., & Dickson, B. (2020). Revisiting the Eastonian framework on political support: Assessing different measures of regime support in mainland China. Comparative Politics, 52(4), 671-678.
Magalhães, P. C. (2014). Government effectiveness and support for democracy. European Journal of Political Research, 53(1), 77-97.
Malaysiakini. (2022). Census 2020: Bumiputera population increases to almost 70pct. February 14. https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/610656.
Mansbridge, J. (1999). Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent “yes”. The Journal of Politics, 61(3), 628-657.
Marshall, M. G., & Gurr, T. R. (2020). Polity v project, political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800-2018. Center for Systemic Peace. https://www.systemicpeace.org/
Mattes, R., & Bratton, M. (2007). Learning about democracy in Africa: Awareness, performance, and experience. American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 192-217.
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415-444.
Merdeka Center (2022). Malaysia’s Upcoming Elections: The State of Play. November 4. https://merdeka.org/merdeka-center-pre-election-national-survey-highlights/
Merkel, W., & Weiffen, B. (2012). Does heterogeneity hinder democracy? Comparative Sociology, 11(3), 387-421.
Mohamad, M., & Suffian, I. (2023). Malaysia’s 15th General Election: Ethnicity Remains the Key Factor in Voter Preferences. ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute, March 24. https://www.iseas.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/ISEAS_Perspective_2023_20.pdf
Montero, J. R., Gunther, R., & Torcal, M. (1997). Democracy in Spain: Legitimacy, discontent, and disaffection. Studies in Comparative International Development, 32, 124-160.
Nadeau, R., and Blais, A. (1993). Accepting the election outcome: The effect of participation on losers’ consent. British Journal of Political Science, 23(4), 553-563.
Nadzri, M. M. N. (2018). The 14th general election, the fall of Barisan Nasional, and political development in Malaysia, 1957-2018. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 37(3), 139-171.
Nathan, A. J. (2020). The puzzle of authoritarian legitimacy. Journal of Democracy, 31(1), 158-168.
Ng, J. W. J., Rangel, G. J., & Phung, Y. C. (2021). Malaysia’s 14th general election: Dissecting the ‘Malaysian tsunami’-Measuring the impacts of ethnicity and urban development on electoral outcomes. Asian Journal of Political Science, 29(1), 42-66.
Ng, J. W. J., Rangel, G. J., Vaithilingam, S., & Pillay, S. S. (2015). The 2013 Malaysian elections: ethnic politics or urban wave? Journal of East Asian Studies, 15(2), 167-198.
Noh, A. (2014). Malaysia 13th general election: A short note on Malaysia’s continuing battle with ethnic politics. Electoral Studies, 34, 266-269.
Noh, A., & Yashaiya, N. H. (2023). When institutions ‘bite’: Malaysia’s flawed democratisation. Contemporary Politics, 29(4), 492-513.
Nord, M., Altman, D., Angiolillo, F., Fernandes, T., God, A. G., & Lindberg, S. I. (2025). Democracy report 2025: 25 years of autocratization - Democracy trumped? V-Dem Institute. https://www.v-dem.net/documents/60/V-dem-dr__2025_lowres.pdf
Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. Cambridge University Press.
Ogenyi, M., & Nchare, K. (2022). Ethnic inequality and anti-authoritarianism in Sub-Saharan Africa. Review of Economic Analysis, 14(1), 51-69.
Ostwald, K. (2013). How to win a lost election: Malapportionment and Malaysia’s 2013 general election. The Round Table, 102(6), 521-532.
Park, C.-M. (2017). Quality of governance and regime support: Evidence from East Asia. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 2(2), 154-175.
Rabushka, A., & Sheplse, K. (1972). Politics in Plural Societies. Merrill.
Ravallion, M. (2020). Ethnic inequality and poverty in Malaysia since May 1969. Part 1: Inequality. World Development, 134, 105040.
Ray, S. (2018). Ethnic inequality and national pride. Political Psychology, 39(2), 263-280.
Silver, B. D. & Dowley, K. M. (2000). Measuring political culture in multiethnic societies: Reaggregating the World Values Survey. Comparative Political Studies, 33(4), 517-550.
Solt, F. (2012). The social origins of authoritarianism. Political Research Quarterly, 65(4), 703-713.
Stewart, F. (2021). Horizontal inequalities and democracy. In G. Vrawford & A.-G. Abdulai (Eds.), Research handbook on democracy and development (pp. 420-441). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Suffian, I., & Lee, T.-D. (2020). How Malaysia voted in 2018. In M. L. Weiss & F. S. Hazis (Eds.), Towards a new Malaysia? The 2018 election and its aftermath. NUS Press.
Sultan Nazrin Shah. (2016). Census population by ethnic group, Peninsular Malaysia, 1911-2020. Economic History of Malaya. https://www.ehm.my/data/population-data/details?eid=ecd4ca01-b13d-4df9-8b7f-bf54e351fd92
Varshney, A. (2001). Ethnic conflict and civil society: India and beyond. World Politics, 53(3), 362-398.
Vogt, M., Bormann, N.-C., Rüegger, S., Cederman, L.-E., Hunziker, P., & Girardin, L. (2015). Integrating data on ethnicity, geography, and conflict: The ethnic power relations data set family. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 59(7), 1327-1342.
Waldron-Moore, P. (1999). Eastern Europe at the crossroads of democratic transition: Evaluating support for democratic institutions, satisfaction with democratic government, and consolidation of democratic regimes. Comparative Political Studies, 32(1), 32-62.
Wan Saiful, W. J. (2020). Why did Bersatu leave Pakatan Harapan? ISEAS - Yusuf Ishak Institute.
Weiss, M. L. (2024). Is Malaysian democracy backsliding or merely staying put? Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 9(1), 9-24.
Welsh, B. (1996). Attitudes toward democracy in Malaysia: Challenges to the regime? Asian Survey, 36(9), 882-903.
Welsh, B. (2004). Real change? Elections in the reformasi era. In E. T. Gomez (Ed.), The state of Malaysia: Ethnicity, equity and reform (pp. 130-156). RoutledgeCurzon.
Welsh, B. (2023a). GE15 voting analysis - Part 3: Hidden, pivotal Indian swing. Bridget Welsh, March 15. https://bridgetwelsh.com/articles/ge15-voting-analysis-part-3-hidden-pivotal-indian-swing/
Welsh, B. (2023b). GE15 voting analysis - Part 4: The Chinese Pole. Bridget Welsh, March 16. https://bridgetwelsh.com/articles/ge15-voting-analysis-part-4-the-chinese-pole/
Welsh, B. (2023c). GE15 voting analysis - Part 7: Battle for Malays. Bridget Welsh, March 26. https://bridgetwelsh.com/articles/ge15-voting-analysis-part-7-battle-for-malays/
Wimmer, A. (2017). Power and pride: National identity and ethnopolitical inequality around the world. World Politics, 69(4), 605-639.
Wong, C.-H. (2018). The rise, resilience and demise of Malaysia’s dominant coalition. The Round Table, 107(6), 755-769.
World Bank. (2025). A fresh take on reducing inequality and enhancing mobility in Malaysia. February 5. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/malaysia/publication/a-fresh-take-on-reducing-inequality-and-enhancing-mobility-in-malaysia.
Wu, W.-C., & Chang, Y.-T. (2019). Income inequality, distributive unfairness, and support for democracy: Evidence from East Asia and Latin America. Democratization, 26(8), 1475-1492.
Wu, C.-Y., & Wu, C.-E. (2022). Regime types and winner-loser gaps in support for democracy in East Asia. Democratization, 29(6), 1157-1175.
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/98790-
dc.description.abstract在不同的選舉結果和政府組成下,各族群的民主支持度差距是否也會有所改變?本文以選舉贏家輸家和族群投票作為研究架構,探討馬來西亞半島各族群在2013、2018和2022年選舉後的民主支持度差距,以及支持度差距的變動。在2013年有過半巫裔是選舉贏家,但是往後兩次選舉卻有過半巫裔成為輸家,華裔和印裔則相反。選舉輸家過半的族群可能會比較不滿意選舉結果,也會認為選舉產生的政府無法代表自己,因此會有較低的民主支持度,贏家過半的族群則相反。本文採用亞洲民主動態調查2014、2019和2023年針對馬來西亞的面訪資料,以反對威權體制的程度作為民主支持的測量,藉由「邏輯迴歸模型」進行分析。實證結果顯示,在2014年,相較於巫裔,印裔的民主支持度較低,華裔則沒有顯著差異。在2019年,相較於巫裔,華裔的民主支持度較高,且差距相較於2014年顯著擴大;印裔的民主支持度較低,差距相較於2014年沒有顯著改變。在2023年,相較於巫裔,華裔的民主支持度較高,且差距相較於2014年顯著擴大;印裔的民主支持度在部分情況下顯著較高,且差距相較於2014年顯著改變。相較於2014年,巫裔在2023年的民主支持度則顯著下降。分析結果印證了大部分的研究假設。儘管後續分析顯示,反對威權不一定等同於支持民主價值,然而對於處在民主化階段的馬來西亞,最大族群巫裔對於威權體制的反對程度有所下降,可能成為民主發展與鞏固的隱憂。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractDo ethnic differences in support for democracy vary under different electoral outcomes and government compositions? This study employs the concepts of electoral winners and losers as well as ethnic voting to examine the differences and changes in democratic support among ethnic groups in Peninsular Malaysia following the general elections of 2013, 2018, and 2022. In the 2013 election, a majority of Malays were electoral winners, whereas in the subsequent two elections, most Malays became losers. In contrast, most Chinese and Indians transitioned from electoral losers to winners. Ethnic groups in which the majority are electoral losers may be more dissatisfied with the election outcomes and more likely to perceive the elected government as unrepresentative of their interests, leading to lower levels of democratic support, while groups with a majority among winners may show the opposite tendency. This study utilizes face-to-face survey data from the Asian Barometer Survey conducted in 2014, 2019, and 2023 in Malaysia. Democratic support is measured through respondents’ rejection of authoritarian rule, and logistic regression models are used for analysis. The empirical findings reveal that in 2014, compared to Malays, Indians exhibited lower democratic support, while no significant difference was found between Malays and Chinese. In 2019, Chinese demonstrated significantly higher democratic support than Malays, and the gap widened relative to 2014; Indians’ support remained lower, with no significant change from 2014. In 2023, Chinese support for democracy remained significantly higher than Malays, and the gap widened compared to 2014. Indians’ support was significantly higher in certain contexts, and the gap compared to 2014 also changed significantly. Furthermore, Malays’ support for democracy significantly declined in 2023 relative to 2014. These results largely support the proposed hypotheses. Although subsequent analyses suggest that opposition to authoritarianism does not necessarily imply full support for democratic values, the decline in rejection of authoritarianism among Malays—the country’s majority group—may pose a potential threat to Malaysia’s democratic development and consolidation.en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-08-19T16:12:51Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2025-08-19T16:12:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書 i
摘要 ii
Abstract iii
目次 iv
圖次 vi
表次 vii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 問題意識與研究問題 4
第三節 章節安排 5
第二章 文獻回顧 7
第一節 體制支持度 7
第二節 不同族群的民主支持度 9
第三節 馬來西亞的族群政治 16
第三章 研究假設與研究設計 20
第一節 研究假設 20
第二節 研究設計 24
第四章 分析結果與討論 31
第一節 初步分析 31
第二節 邏輯迴歸分析 36
第三節 其他交互作用分析 48
第四節 問卷中的選舉贏家和輸家分析 53
第五節 族群態度差異的機制探討 59
第六節 研究發現討論 65
第五章 結論與建議 72
第一節 研究發現與貢獻 72
第二節 研究限制 73
第三節 未來研究方向 74
參考文獻 75
附錄 84
表A.1:變數名稱、問卷題目與編碼方式 84
表A.2:第四波調查(2014年)的敘述統計表 87
表A.3:第五波調查(2019年)的敘述統計表 88
表A.4:第六波調查(2023年)的敘述統計表 89
表A.5:馬來西亞全國和半島民眾反對威權體制的比例 90
表A.6:馬來西亞半島三大族群反對威權體制的比例 90
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subject民主支持zh_TW
dc.subject民主鞏固zh_TW
dc.subject馬來西亞zh_TW
dc.subject族群投票zh_TW
dc.subject選舉輸家zh_TW
dc.subjectelectoral losersen
dc.subjectethnic votingen
dc.subjectMalaysiaen
dc.subjectdemocratic supporten
dc.subjectdemocratic consolidationen
dc.title族群政治、選舉結果與民主鞏固:馬來西亞的實證研究zh_TW
dc.titleEthnic Politics, Electoral Outcomes, and Democratic Consolidation: An Empirical Study of Malaysiaen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear113-2-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee吳文欽;黃凱苹zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeWen-Chin Wu;Kai-Ping Huangen
dc.subject.keyword民主鞏固,民主支持,選舉輸家,族群投票,馬來西亞,zh_TW
dc.subject.keyworddemocratic consolidation,democratic support,electoral losers,ethnic voting,Malaysia,en
dc.relation.page90-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202504122-
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)-
dc.date.accepted2025-08-14-
dc.contributor.author-college社會科學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept政治學系-
dc.date.embargo-lift2025-08-20-
顯示於系所單位:政治學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-113-2.pdf4.32 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved