請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/98777完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 周中哲 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Chung-Che Chou | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 謝旻諺 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Min-Yen Hsieh | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-08-19T16:09:48Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-08-20 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-08-19 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-08-12 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | AISC (2022), Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, ANSI/AISC 341- 22 , American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Illinois.
AISC (2022), Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, ANSI/AISC 360-22, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Illinois. ASCE (2022). Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE/SEI 7-22, American Society of Civil Engineers, Washington, D.C Chou, C. C., Liu, J. H., & Pham, D. H. (2012). Steel buckling‐restrained braced frames with single and dual corner gusset connections: seismic tests and analyses. Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, 41(7), 1137-1156. Córdova, A., Chou, C. C., Wu, C. J., Tsampras, G., Uang, C. M., & Chao, S. H. (2025). Modeling and Response of a Three‐Story Steel Building With Sliding Slabs in Earthquake Motions. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 54(3), 1101-1121. Tsampras, G., Sause, R., Fleischman, R. B., & Restrepo, J. I. (2018). Experimental study of deformable connection consisting of friction device and rubber bearings to connect floor system to lateral force resisting system. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 47(4), 1032-1053. Jing, J., Clifton, G. C., Roy, K., & Lim, J. B. (2020). Three-story modular steel building with a novel slider device: Shake table tests on a scaled down model and numerical investigation. Thin-Walled Structures, 155, 106932. Mosley, H., & Mayer, A. (1999). Benchmarking national labour market performance: A radar chart approach (No. FS I 99-202). WZB Discussion paper. Indrei, E., & Nurbekyan, L. (2015). On the stability of the polygonal isoperimetric inequality. Advances in Mathematics, 276, 62-86. Shi, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, M., Ding, Y., & Li, Z. X. (2023). Seismic performance analysis of steel frame structures with separated three‐dimensional isolation. Earthquake Engineering and Resilience, 2(1), 52-73. 林皇佐(2023),「實尺寸三層樓鋼構架二元系統於 2022 池上地震下之振動台試驗:中等韌性箱型鋼柱、全鋼型夾型挫屈束制斜撐及滑動樓板之耐震性能」,碩士論文,國立臺灣大學土木工程學系。 黃于慈(2023),「以訊號分析方法進行長期結構健康監測」,碩士論文,國立臺灣大學土木工程系。 黃立宇(2024),「可變勁度自復位斜撐與自復位碟型彈簧抗震裝置研發及振動台試驗」,碩士論文,國立臺灣大學土木工程學系。 吳其錚(2024),「實尺寸三層樓自復位斜撐構架含滑動消能樓板之振動台試驗」,碩士論文,國立臺灣大學土木工程學系。 簡澔瑋(2025),「BRB及SCB構架含滑動樓板雙向振動台試驗:構架設計及實驗」,碩士論文,國立臺灣大學土木工程學系。 陳緯軒(2025),AISC 341韌性焊接組合箱型鋼柱新寬厚比規定研究」,碩士論文,國立臺灣大學土木工程學系。 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/98777 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 傳統鋼構建築中樓板多採用剪力釘與鋼梁剛接,地震時無法釋放樓板與構架間的相對運動,導致過大的慣性力傳遞至構架及非結構元件,進而造成設備損壞與功能中斷。為改善此問題,滑動樓板系統(Sliding Slab System)被提出作為提升地震韌性與減震效果的創新設計,透過樓板與構架間允許滑動,降低傳遞至主結構之地震力,並有效控制樓板加速度。但目前國內針對滑動樓板之大型實驗研究多侷限於單向輸入,對實際地震中常見的雙向輸入反應掌握不足,尤其在樓板旋轉、摩擦行為與裝置協同消能等面向仍存研究缺口。
本研究為首度於國內進行具滑動樓板之鋼構建築系統在雙向地震輸入下之大型振動台實驗與數值模擬分析。試體為一層樓全尺寸鋼構架,樓板與構架間分別配置夾型挫屈束制支撐(H-SBRB)與摩擦裝置(FD)作為水平方向消能元件,透過振動台施加不同強度與方向之地震輸入,量測滑動量、加速度、旋轉行為與殘餘位移等動態反應。實驗結果顯示,滑動樓板系統可有效降低地震下樓板加速度與構架內力,並具一定程度之旋轉自由度與能量吸收潛力。不同裝置類型對滑動特性與震後殘餘變形具明顯影響,其中 H-SBRB 雖具優異消能能力,惟高震度下易出現接合破壞,FD則表現穩定但復位能力較弱。 為補足震後性能探討,本研究另於數值模擬中導入自復位滑動裝置(Self-Centering Spring Device, SCSD),使用PISA3D建立三維非線性模型進行歷時分析,模擬結果與實驗高度吻合 (Phase 1與Phase 3),並探討不同𝛼參數設計對滑動行為與震後殘餘位移之影響,證實 SCSD 可顯著提升樓板復位能力,控制震後樓板殘餘位移,惟須在加速度放大與滑動能力間取得平衡。整體而言,本研究針對滑動樓板系統於雙向地震下之動態行為、消能效能與自復位潛力進行整合性探討,建立完整之實驗與模擬分析流程,提供未來耐震設計與高韌性鋼構建築應用之重要依據。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Traditional steel building systems typically employ rigid connections between slabs and beams using shear studs, preventing relative movement between the slabs and the lateral force-resisting system (LFRS) during seismic events. As a result, excessive inertial forces are transmitted to the structural frame and non-structural components, leading to equipment damage and loss of functionality. To address this issue, the Sliding Slab System has been proposed as an innovative seismic design strategy to enhance structural resilience and reduce seismic demands. By allowing relative sliding between the floor slab and the frame, the system effectively reduces the seismic forces transmitted to the main structure and controls floor acceleration. However, existing large-scale experimental research in Taiwan has largely focused on unidirectional ground motions, with limited understanding of the system’s behavior under realistic bidirectional inputs—particularly regarding slab rotation, frictional behavior, and the coordinated performance of energy dissipation devices.
This study presents the first large-scale shaking table test and numerical simulation of a steel structure equipped with a sliding slab system under bidirectional seismic input in Taiwan. A full-scale, single-story steel frame specimen was constructed, with H-shaped buckling-restrained braces (H-SBRBs) and friction devices (FDs) installed between the floor and frame as horizontal energy dissipation elements. The system was subjected to bidirectional seismic excitations of varying intensities, and dynamic responses such as sliding displacement, floor acceleration, rotational behavior, and residual displacement were recorded. Experimental results demonstrated that the sliding slab system effectively reduced floor accelerations and frame forces during earthquakes, while also exhibiting rotational freedom and energy absorption potential. The performance varied with device type: H-SBRBs showed excellent energy dissipation but suffered from joint damage under strong motions; FDs offered stable performance but had weaker self-centering capability. To further investigate post-earthquake performance, a self-centering spring device (SCSD) was introduced in the numerical simulation phase. A 3D nonlinear model was developed in PISA3D, and time history analyses were conducted. The simulation results showed high agreement with experimental data (from Phase 1 and Phase 3) and revealed that SCSDs can significantly enhance residual displacement recovery. Parametric studies on different alpha (𝛼) values confirmed the trade-off between acceleration amplification and sliding capability. Overall, this study provides a comprehensive evaluation of the dynamic behavior, energy dissipation performance, and self-centering potential of sliding slab systems under bidirectional seismic loading, offering critical insights for the development of resilient and low-damage steel building designs. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-08-19T16:09:48Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-08-19T16:09:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
致謝 ii 摘要 iii ABSTRACT iv 目次 vi 圖次 ix 表次 xiii 照片次 xiv 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 前言 1 1.2 文獻回顧 2 1.3 研究方法 4 1.4 論文架構 5 第二章 實尺寸一層樓鋼構架試體介紹 6 2.1 一層樓構架試體設計 6 2.2 一層樓構架試體試驗規劃 7 2.3 滑動樓板系統 8 2.3.1 水平裝置細節與行為 8 2.3.2 水平裝置鉸接設計細節 9 2.3.3 樓板栓接接合 10 2.4 試體製造與安裝 10 2.4.1 樓板與鑽孔 11 2.4.2 水平裝置製造 11 2.4.3 實驗場水平裝置安裝 12 2.5 量測系統 12 2.5.1 應變計 12 2.5.2 位移計 12 2.5.3 加速規 13 2.5.4 荷重元 13 2.5.5 光學動態捕捉系統 13 2.6 試體力量與位移計算方式 14 2.6.1 慣性力 14 2.6.2 構架及樓板側位移 15 2.6.3 滑動樓板位移 15 2.6.4 滑動樓板旋轉 16 2.6.5 水平裝置內力 17 2.7 材料性質 17 第三章 實驗結果分析與討論 18 3.1 滑動樓板反應 18 3.1.1 樓板相對構架位移 18 3.1.2 加速度與相對位移關係 21 3.1.3 樓板扭轉行為 23 3.2 元件試驗 24 3.2.1 試驗規劃與目的 24 3.2.2 試體加工與組裝 25 3.2.3 試驗結果與分析 26 3.3 樓板與構架間摩擦力 27 3.3.1 摩擦力Ff計算 27 3.3.2 Fteflon 與Ff比較 28 第四章 數值模擬分析與驗證 30 4.1 數值模型建構 30 4.1.1 結構模型說明 30 4.1.2 構件元素與材料參數設定 31 4.1.3 載重設定 34 4.2 分析方法介紹 34 4.2.1 模態分析 34 4.2.2 側推分析 35 4.2.3 非線性歷時分析 35 4.3 非線性動力歷時分析結果驗證 36 4.3.1 Phase 3模型驗證(固定樓板階段) 36 4.3.2 Phase 1模型驗證(滑動樓板+H-SBRB) 36 4.4 自復位彈簧裝置模擬探討 38 4.4.1 介紹與參數設定 38 4.4.2 減少殘餘位移效益分析 40 第五章 結論與建議 46 參考資料 48 附錄A 試體設計圖 132 附錄B 試驗資料 135 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 滑動消能樓板 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 夾型挫屈束制支撐 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 雙向振動台試驗 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 非線性歷時反應分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 自復位彈簧裝置 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Nonlinear response history analysis | en |
| dc.subject | Sliding slab | en |
| dc.subject | Sandwiched buckling-restrained brace | en |
| dc.subject | Self-Centering Spring Device (SCSD) | en |
| dc.subject | Bidirectional shaking table test | en |
| dc.title | BRB及SCB鋼構架含滑動樓板雙向振動台試驗之模型發展與驗證 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Modeling and Response Comparison for a BRB-SCB Steel Frame with Sliding Slab under Bidirectional Shaking Table Tests | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 鍾興陽;許協隆 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Hsin-Yang Chung;Hsieh-Lung Hsu | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 滑動消能樓板,夾型挫屈束制支撐,雙向振動台試驗,非線性歷時反應分析,自復位彈簧裝置, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Sliding slab,Sandwiched buckling-restrained brace,Bidirectional shaking table test,Nonlinear response history analysis,Self-Centering Spring Device (SCSD), | en |
| dc.relation.page | 137 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202503886 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-08-14 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2025-08-20 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf | 24.95 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
