請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/98640完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 游景雲 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Gene Jiing-Yun You | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 林柏任 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Po-Jen Lin | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-08-18T01:10:54Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-08-18 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-08-15 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-08-05 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. Asnaashari, A.、Akhtari, A. A.、Dehghani, A. A.、Bonakdari, H.(2016)。Experimental and numerical investigation of the flow field in the gradual transition of rectangular to trapezoidal open channels。Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics,10(1),272-282。https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2016.1149102
2. Ata, R.、Goeury, C.、Hervouet, J. M.(2014)。Telemac-2d software user manual(研究計劃編號Release 7.0) 3. Bremen, R.、Hager, W. H.(1993)。T-jump in abruptly expanding channel。Journal of Hydraulic Research,31(1),61-78。https://doi.org/10.1080/00221689309498860 4. Bremen, R.、Sinniger, R.(1990)。Expanding stilling basin。106。 5. Brunner, G. W.(2020)。Hec-ras, river analysis system hydraulic reference manual(研究計劃編號CPD-69)。US Army Corps of Engineers, H. E. C. H.。 6. Brunner, G. W.、CEIWR-HEC(2016)。River analysis system, 2d modeling user's manual(研究計劃編號CPD-68A)。US Army Corps of Engineers, I. f. W. R., Hydrologic Engineering Center (HEC)。 7. Chow, V. T.(1959)。Open-channel hydraulics 8. Deal, E. C.、Parr, A. D.、Young, C. B.(2017)。A comparison study of one- and two-dimensional hydraulic models for river environments(研究計劃編號KS-17-02) 9. DHI(2004)。Mike 21c river morphology。Environment, D. W.。https://www.dhigroup.com/upload/dhisoftwarearchive/shortdescriptions/wr/m21c_short_2004.pdf 10. Environment, D. W.(2007)。Mike 21 & mike 3 flow model fm - hydrodynamic module - short description。DHI。www.dhigroup.com 11. Greenshields, C. J. (2024)。 User guide, OpenFOAM (第12 版, )。 The OpenFOAM Foundation。 12. Hager, W. H.、Bremen, R.(1989)。Classical hydraulic jump: Sequent depths。Journal of Hydraulic Research,27(5),565-585。https://doi.org/10.1080/00221688909499111 13. Haghdoost, M.、Sajjadi, S.、Fathi Moghadam, M.、Ahadiyan, J.(2022)。Experimental study of spatial hydraulic jump stabilization using lateral jet flow。Water Supply,22(11),8337-8352。https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2022.376 14. He, Z.-y.、Xiang, P.-p.、Hong, Z.-h.、Liu, W.-c.(2022)。Research on the optimization of gradual expanding stilling basin。。 15. Herbrand, K.(1973)。The spatial hydraulic jump。Journal of Hydraulic Research,11(3),205-218。https://doi.org/10.1080/00221687309499774 16. Kawamura, T.、Mayer, S.、Garapon, A.、Sørensen, L.(2002)。Large eddy simulation of a flow past a free surface piercing circular cylinder。ASME. J. Fluids Eng. ,。 17. Kline, S. J.(1959)。On the nature of stall。Journal of Basic Engineering,,305-319。 18. Lai, Y. G.(2008)。Srh-2d version 2: Theory and user's manual. 19. Masuda, T.、Tagawa, T.(2021)。Effect of asymmetry of channels on flows in parallel plates with a sudden expansion。Symmetry,13(10)。https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13101857 20. Mossa, M.、Petrillo, A.、Chanson, H.(2003)。Tailwater level effects on flow conditions at an abrupt drop。Journal of Hydraulic Research,41(1),39-51。https://doi.org/10.1080/00221680309499927 21. Nashta, C. F.、Garde, R. J.(1988)。Subcritical flow in rigid-bed open channel expansions。Journal of Hydraulic Research,26(1),49-65。https://doi.org/10.1080/00221688809499234 22. Nasrin Hassanpour、Ali Hosseinzadeh Dalir、Davod Farsadizadeh、Gualtieri, C.(2017)。An experimental study of hydraulic jump in a gradually expanding rectangular stilling basin with roughened bed。Water,9(12)。https://doi.org/10.3390/w9120945 23. Omid, M. H.、Esmaeeli Varaki, M.、Narayanan, R.(2010)。Gradually expanding hydraulic jump in a trapezoidal channel。Journal of Hydraulic Research,45(4),512-518。https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2007.9521786 24. Oosterholt, G. A.(1947)。An investigation of the energy dissipated in a surface roller。Applied Scientific Research,A1,107-130。 25. Peterka, A. J.(1984)。Hydraulic design of stilling basins and energy dissipators(研究計劃編號25)。United States Department of the Interior, B. o. R.。 26. Rajaratnam, N.、Subramanya, K.(1968)。Hydraulic jumps below abrupt symmetrical expansions。Proc. ASCE, J. Hydraulics Division,94(HY2),481-503。 27. Torkamanzad, N.、Hosseinzadeh Dalir, A.、Salmasi, F.、Abbaspour, A.(2019)。Hydraulic jump below abrupt asymmetric expanding stilling basin on rough bed。Water,11(9)。https://doi.org/10.3390/w11091756 28. Wang, T.-W.、Chonbienchob, T.(1985)。Hydraulic jump in adverse sloping channels。33(4),9-30。 29. Yoosefdoost, A.、Lubitz, W. D.(2022)。Sluice gate design and calibration: Simplified models to distinguish flow conditions and estimate discharge coefficient and flow rate。Water,14(8)。https://doi.org/10.3390/w14081215 30. Zabaleta, F.、Bombardelli, F. A.、Valbuena, S. A.(2022年Oct 26th)。Preliminary evaluation and design of a new energy dissipation stilling basin via numerical and experimental modeling9th IAHR International Symposium on Hydraulic Structures,Roorkee, Roorkee, India。https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/ishs 31. Zhou, J. G.、Stansby, P. K.(1999)。2d shallow water flow model for the hydraulic jump。International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids,29,375-387。 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/98640 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 在水利工程中,靜水池作為一種水力消能設施,主要透過水躍和紊流作用,將溢洪道排出的大量動能與位能轉化並消散。水躍是在消能池內影響消能的重要因素。傳統上,儘管水躍為三維(3D)現象,研究卻多採一維(1D)或3D模型。3D模型精度高但計算成本高,1D模型則無法捕捉水躍的渦流與側向流動。考量計算效率與準確性,二維(2D)模型提供了一個有潛力的替代方案。本研究旨在評估2D水力模型在模擬突擴、漸擴式消能靜水池實驗中的應用能力及局限性。研究核心為透過模擬不同上下游寬度比、入流擴張角度和入流偏心率等幾何設計參數組合,以找出能最大化能量消散效率的最佳設計。入流擴張角度和入流偏心率與水躍後水深(h2)的模擬與實驗數據的誤差率呈正比,而與上下游寬度比呈反比。上下游寬度比對消能效率有顯著影響,但當寬度比達到一定值後,消能效率存在極限,不再顯著提升。擴張角度未在消能效率上呈現明確趨勢,其特性隨尾水條件變化而異。偏心率在消能效率的特性上與擴張角度類似,其特性同樣隨尾水條件變化而變化,但當入流的側牆與擴張後的側牆重合時,消能效率會降低,這可能與其「與h2誤差率呈正相關」的驗證結果有關。最後進行了混合幾何因子之設計,確認會有疊加效應,但疊加後的因子特性會有些許改變。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In hydraulic engineering, stilling basins serve as crucial energy dissipators, primarily transforming and dissipating the significant kinetic and potential energy discharged from spillways through hydraulic jumps and turbulent action. Hydraulic jumps are a key factor influencing energy dissipation within these basins. Traditionally, despite hydraulic jumps being a three-dimensional (3D) phenomenon, most research has employed one-dimensional (1D) or 3D models. While 3D models offer high accuracy, they come with substantial computational costs. Conversely, 1D models fail to capture the complex vortex and lateral flows inherent in hydraulic jumps. Considering both computational efficiency and accuracy, two-dimensional (2D) models present a promising alternative. This study aims to evaluate the applicability and limitations of 2D hydraulic models in simulating experimental cases of abrupt and gradual expansion stilling basins. The core of this research revolves around identifying optimal geometric design parameters, including various expansion width ratios, expansion angles, and inflow eccentricities, to maximize energy dissipation efficiency. Our findings indicate that the error rate between simulated and experimental data for the tailwater depth (h2) after a hydraulic jump is directly proportional to the expansion angle and inflow eccentricity, but inversely proportional to the expansion width ratio. The expansion width ratio significantly impacts energy dissipation efficiency; however, there's a limit to this enhancement, beyond which further increases in the ratio do not lead to substantial improvements in efficiency. The expansion angle did not show a clear trend in energy dissipation efficiency, with its characteristics varying depending on tailwater conditions. Similarly, eccentricity exhibited characteristics in energy dissipation efficiency akin to the expansion angle, also changing with tailwater conditions. Notably, when the inflow's sidewall aligns with the expanded sidewall, energy dissipation efficiency decreases, which may be related to its positive correlation with the h2error rate. Finally, a design incorporating mixed geometric factors was implemented, confirming a superposition effect, though the characteristics of the superimposed factors exhibited slight alterations. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-08-18T01:10:54Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-08-18T01:10:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
摘要 ii Abstract iii 目次 v 圖次 viii 表次 xi 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景 1 1.2 研究目的 2 1.3 研究流程及架構 3 1.3.1 研究流程 3 1.3.2 研究架構 4 第二章 文獻回顧 5 2.1 能量定義 6 2.2 突擴與漸擴之水躍種類 7 2.2.1 Repelled jump(R-jump) 7 2.2.2 Spatial jump(S-jump) 7 2.2.3 Transitional jump(T-jump) 7 2.3 消能池的幾何因子 8 2.3.1 上下游寬度比 8 2.3.2 擴張角度 8 2.3.3 入流偏心率 10 2.4 模式方法 12 2.4.1 模式介紹 12 第三章 研究方法 14 3.1 模式選擇 14 3.1.1 HEC-RAS 2D 14 3.1.2 SRH-2D 16 3.1.3 簡易案例測試與模式選擇 17 3.2 模式驗證 17 3.2.1 尾水折減參數決定 18 3.2.2 實驗一 19 3.2.3 實驗二 21 3.2.4 實驗三 21 3.3 幾何因子模擬 22 3.3.1 上下游寬度比 23 3.3.2 擴張角度 24 3.3.3 入流偏心率 25 3.3.4 混合模擬 25 第四章 模式模擬結果分析 26 4.1 模式選擇 26 4.1.1 HEC-RAS-2D 26 4.1.2 SRH-2D 33 4.1.3 結論 34 4.2 模式驗證 34 4.2.1 尾水折減參數決定 34 4.2.2 實驗一、二、三結果(z方向) 37 4.2.3 實驗一結果(x方向) 40 4.2.4 模擬結果原因推測 44 4.3 幾何因子模擬結果 45 4.3.1 上下游寬度比 45 4.3.2 擴張角度 47 4.3.3 入流偏心率 49 4.3.4 混合測試結果 50 第五章 結論與建議 54 5.1 結論 54 5.2 建議 55 5.2.1 對未來研究的建議 55 5.2.2 對實務應用的建議 57 參考文獻 58 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 突擴消能池 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 二維水力模式 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 消能效率 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | SRH-2D | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 突擴水躍 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | abrupt expansion hydraulic jump | en |
| dc.subject | SRH-2D | en |
| dc.subject | energy dissipation efficiency | en |
| dc.subject | abrupt expansion stilling basin | en |
| dc.subject | Two-dimensional hydraulic model | en |
| dc.title | 運用二維模式於靜水池消能效率之探討 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Investigation of a Two-Dimensional Numerical Model for Characterizing Energy Dissipation Efficiency in Stilling Basins | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 石棟鑫;胡明哲;孫建平;陳憲宗 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Dong-Sin Shih;Ming-Che Hu;Jian-Ping Suen;Shien-Tsung Chen | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 二維水力模式,突擴消能池,突擴水躍,SRH-2D,消能效率, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Two-dimensional hydraulic model,abrupt expansion stilling basin,abrupt expansion hydraulic jump,SRH-2D,energy dissipation efficiency, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 60 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202503786 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-08-11 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2025-08-18 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf | 2.57 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
