Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 工學院
  3. 土木工程學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/98613
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor郭安妮zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorAnnie On-Lei Kwoken
dc.contributor.author張永詮zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorYung-Chuan Changen
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-18T01:04:55Z-
dc.date.available2025-08-18-
dc.date.copyright2025-08-15-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.date.submitted2025-08-05-
dc.identifier.citation1. ABAQUS (2024) Analysis User’s Manual (v6.6). Dassault Systems Simulia Inc.
2. Ashford, S. A., Sitar, N., Lysmer, J., & Deng, N. (1997). Topographic effects on the seismic response of steep slopes. Bulletin of the seismological society of America, 87(3), 701-709.
3. Baker, R., Shukha, R., Operstein, V., & Frydman, S. (2006). Stability charts for pseudo-static slope stability analysis. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 26(9), 813-823.
4. Das, B. M., & Sobhan, K. (2011). Principles of Geotechnical Engineering.
5. Denlinger, R. P., & Iverson, R. M. (1990). Limiting equilibrium and liquefaction potential in infinite submarine slopes. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 9(4), 299-312.
6. Fellenius, W. K. A. (1927). Erdstatische Berechnungen mit Reibung und Kohäsion (Adhäsion) und unter Annahme kreiszylindrischer Gleitflächen. W. Ernst & Sohn.
7. FLAC (2024). FLAC3D 7.0 Documentation. Itasca Consulting Group Inc.
8. Joe, W., & Chern, C. S. (1992). in Taiwan Strait during summertime. La mer, 30, 213-221.
9. Karray, M., Hussien, M. N., Delisle, M. C., & Ledoux, C. (2018). Framework to assess pseudo-static approach for seismic stability of clayey slopes. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 55(12), 1860-1876.
10. Lysmer, J., & Kuhlemeyer, R. L. (1969). Finite dynamic model for infinite media. Journal of the engineering mechanics division, 95(4), 859-877.
11. Ma, J. (2015). Numerical modelling of submarine landslides and their impact to underwater infrastructure using the material point method.
12. Macedo, J., & Candia, G. (2020). Performance-based assessment of the seismic pseudo-static coefficient used in slope stability analysis. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 133, 106109.
13. Ngo, V. L., Lee, C., Lee, E. H., & Kim, J. M. (2021). Semi-Automated Procedure to Estimate Nonlinear Kinematic Hardening Model to Simulate the Nonlinear Dynamic Properties of Soil and Rock. Applied Sciences, 11(18), 8611.
14. Nian, T. K., Guo, X. S., Zheng, D. F., Xiu, Z. X., & Jiang, Z. B. (2019). Susceptibility assessment of regional submarine landslides triggered by seismic actions. Applied Ocean Research, 93, 101964.
15. Rodríguez-Ochoa, R., Nadim, F., & Hicks, M. A. (2015). Influence of weak layers on seismic stability of submarine slopes. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 65, 247-268.
16. Safety, I. S. (2004). NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures (FEMA 450). Building Seismic Safety Council, National Institute of Building Sciences: Washington, DC, USA.
17. Steward, T., Sivakugan, N., Shukla, S. K., & Das, B. M. (2011). Taylor’s slope stability charts revisited. International Journal of Geomechanics, 11(4), 348-352.
18. Taylor, D. W. (1937). Stability of earth slopes. Journal of the Boston Society of Civil Engineers, 24(3), 197-247.
19. Tsai, C.-C., Mejia, L. H., and Meymand, P. (2014). A strain-based procedure to estimate strength softening in saturated clays during earthquakes. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 66, 191–198.
20. Vucetic, M., & Dobry, R. (1991). Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response. Journal of geotechnical engineering, 117(1), 89-107.
21. 台灣電力公司 (2018)。離岸風力發電第二期計畫可行性研究。
22. 楊承華 (2024)。海床拖錨承載力之數值研究。國立臺灣大學土木工程學系學位論文,1-131。
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/98613-
dc.description.abstract近年來,隨著全球對能源需求的提升與可再生能源技術的快速進展,海洋資源的開發活動愈發活躍,特別是在石油與天然氣開採以及離岸風電等領域。這些工程設施多建置於大陸棚及其邊緣區域,而這些區域常伴隨著地質條件複雜的海底邊坡。海底邊坡若因天然或人為因素發生破壞,不僅會對離岸風力機基礎、油氣輸送管線與其他設施造成嚴重損壞,進而導致工程延誤與重大經濟損失,更會因海底修復工作的困難度高及環境危險性強,使得災後復原作業代價昂貴且耗時。因此,深入瞭解海底邊坡的破壞機制,並建立可靠的破壞模式與分析方法,對於海洋工程設施的風險管理與設計安全性而言具有相當關鍵的意義。
本研究採用有限元素軟體ABAQUS對海底邊坡進行穩定性分析。首先,在靜態條件下,針對不同坡度的海底邊坡幾何,利用強度折減法(Strength Reduction Method)計算其安全係數。分析中同時進行總應力分析(Total Stress Analysis, TSA)與有效應力分析(Effective Stress Analysis, ESA),以探討不同分析方法對安全係數結果的影響,並與陸域飽和土坡之行為進行對比,了解海水與孔壓對於邊坡穩定性的潛在影響。此外,為模擬地震條件下海底邊坡的動態行為,本研究進一步於 ABAQUS 中進行動態分析,並引入地震加速度歷時作為輸入地震。分析中特別考慮地震動的振幅大小與頻率組成等特性,藉此評估其對邊坡反應的影響。材料行為方面,使用簡化非線性運動硬化模型(Simplified Nonlinear Kinematic Hardening, SNKH Model),以模擬土壤於反覆剪應變歷程下之非線性與循環硬化特性。最後探討在不同地震歷史、材料強度、地盤種類下邊坡位移及剪應變情形,以及地震動放大比分析(Ground Motion Amplification Ratio, GMAR),結果顯示GMAR並不與坡角、地盤種類、地震最大加速度有絕對關係,而是和地震主頻大小、土壤強度參數等等有密切關係,說明邊坡因低頻率地震產生的共振效應是動態分析中導致地震動放大和破壞的主因,本研究最後進一步與陸地彈性邊坡比較其地震動放大效應,發現絕大部分GMAR值皆小於陸地彈性邊坡,說明邊坡產生塑性破壞的能量耗散使得地震波無法有效轉換成地表加速度。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, the development of offshore resources such as oil and wind energy has become increasingly active. However, submarine slope failures can severely impact the construction and operation of offshore infrastructure such as wind turbine foundations and pipelines, resulting in substantial losses. Moreover, the repair of submarine facilities is extremely challenging, not only due to high costs but also because personnel are exposed to hazardous working environments. Therefore, understanding the failure mechanisms of submarine slopes and conducting failure analyses are critically important.
In this study, stability analyses of submarine slope were conducted using the ABAQUS software. Factors of safety for submarine slope with various slope angles under static condition were computed using the strength reduction method. Total stress analysis (TSA) and effective stress analysis (ESA) were carried out to compare the factors of safety corresponding to saturated slopes on land.
For the evaluation of seismic submarine slope stability, dynamic analyses were performed in ABAQUS. Effects of ground motion characteristics (such as amplitude, frequency content) on the seismic behavior of submarine slope were studied. Nonlinear material model (Simplified Nonlinear Kinematic Hardening, SNKH Model) is used to simulate the nonlinear and cyclic behavior of soils under repeated shear loading. The study examines displacement, shear strain, and ground motion amplification ratio (GMAR) under various seismic inputs, soil strengths, and bedrock types. Results indicate that GMAR is more influenced by the dominant frequency and soil strength than by slope angle, ground type, or PGA, highlighting resonance from low-frequency earthquakes as a key factor in amplification and failure. Compared to elastic land slopes, this study shows lower GMAR due to energy dissipation from plastic deformation.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-08-18T01:04:55Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2025-08-18T01:04:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents致謝 i
摘要 ii
Abstract iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS v
List of Figures viii
List of Tables xvii
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Motivation 1
1.2 Research Method 2
1.3 Thesis Organization 4
Chapter 2 Literature Review 5
2.1 Information of The Taiwan Strait 5
2.1.1 Topography and Soil properties 6
2.2 Introduction of Submarine Slope 8
2.2.1 Observations of on-Land Slope Failure Mechanisms 9
2.2.2 Distribution of Failure Trigger Mechanisms of Submarine Slope 11
2.2.3 Stability Evaluation in Limit Equilibrium Method 12
2.2.4 Stability Evaluation in Finite Element Method 16
2.2.5 Stability Evaluation under Seismic Loading 18
2.3 Dynamic Soil Properties 20
2.3.1 Cyclic Softening of Soil 20
2.3.2 Simplified Nonlinear Kinematic Hardening Model 24
2.4 Numerical Modeling 29
2.4.1 Infinite Element Boundary 29
2.4.2 Quiet Boundary on Elastic Half Space Simulation 32
Chapter 3 Methodology 34
3.1 ABAQUS Model Setting and Verification 34
3.1.1 Model Geometry 34
3.1.2 Material 35
3.1.3 Element Type and Mesh 35
3.1.3 Boundary Conditions and Loads 36
3.1.4 Verification 37
3.2 Static Analyses of Submarine Slope under Numerical Simulation 39
3.2.1 Initial Conditions 39
3.2.2 Model Geometry of 5 Degree & 10 Degree & 20 Degree Slope 44
3.2.3 Total Stress & Effective Stress and Effective Stress with Pore Pressure Models 45
3.3 Earthquake Analysis 46
3.3.1 Infinite Element Boundary 47
3.3.2 Ground Response Verification in Rigid Half Space 49
3.3.3 Ground Response Verification in Elastic Half Space 51
3.3.4 Model Dimensions for Seismic Slope Stability Analysis 57
3.3.5 Nonlinear Material Model (SNKH Model) 67
3.3.6 Modified Boundary Setting for Slopes with Elastic Half Space 71
3.3.7 Input Motions Information and Materials 75
Chapter 4 Simulation Results and Discussions 82
4.1 Stability Analysis of Strength Reduction Method 82
4.1.1 Models with Total Stress Parameters 82
4.1.2 Models with Effective Stress Parameters 87
4.1.3 Stability Analysis under Different Depths of Water 93
4.1.4 Effect of Thickness of Foundation Soil on Slope Failure 95
4.2 Seismic Analysis 97
4.2.1 2-D SNKH Model Verification with 1-D DEEPSOIL Nonlinear Analysis 98
4.2.2 X-Direction Displacement and Shear Strain Histories in Different Earthquake Motions and Slope Angles 105
4.2.3 X-Direction Displacement and Shear Strain Histories in Different Depth of Water 112
4.2.4 Ground Motion Amplification Profiles 115
4.2.5 Slope Failure Observations 129
Chapter 5 Conclusions and Recommendations 132
5.1 Conclusions 132
5.1.1 Stability Analyses 132
5.1.2 Seismic Analyses 134
5.2 Recommendations for Submarine Slope Studies 136
REFERENCES 138
Appendix A: X-direction displacement and shear strain histories at DW = 50 m 141
Appendix B: X-direction displacement and shear strain histories at DW = 25 m 171
-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subjectABAQUSzh_TW
dc.subject海底邊坡zh_TW
dc.subject地震動放大比zh_TW
dc.subject非線性動態模型zh_TW
dc.subject地盤反應分析zh_TW
dc.subject動態分析zh_TW
dc.subject強度折減法zh_TW
dc.subjectGround Motion Amplification Ratioen
dc.subjectStrength Reduction Methoden
dc.subjectABAQUSen
dc.subjectSNKH modelen
dc.subjectSubmarine Slopeen
dc.subjectGround Response Analysisen
dc.subjectDynamic Analysisen
dc.title海底邊坡在地震作用下的數值模擬分析zh_TW
dc.titleNumerical Simulation of Submarine Slope under Seismic Loadingen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear113-2-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee關百宸;蔣榮zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteePai-Chen Guan;Jung Chiangen
dc.subject.keyword海底邊坡,ABAQUS,強度折減法,動態分析,地盤反應分析,非線性動態模型,地震動放大比,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordSubmarine Slope,ABAQUS,Strength Reduction Method,Dynamic Analysis,Ground Response Analysis,SNKH model,Ground Motion Amplification Ratio,en
dc.relation.page184-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202503752-
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)-
dc.date.accepted2025-08-11-
dc.contributor.author-college工學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept土木工程學系-
dc.date.embargo-lift2025-08-18-
顯示於系所單位:土木工程學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-113-2.pdf12.54 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved