請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/98528完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 彭之皓 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Chi-How Peng | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 廖慧青 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Huei-Ching Liao | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-08-14T16:27:57Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-08-15 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-08-14 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-07-30 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | (1) Wang, C.; Kim, Y.-J.; Vriza, A.; Batra, R.; Baskaran, A.; Shan, N.; Li, N.; Darancet, P.; Ward, L.; Liu, Y. Autonomous platform for solution processing of electronic polymers. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16 (1), 1498.
(2) Liu, T.; Heimonen, J.; Zhang, Q.; Yang, C.-Y.; Huang, J.-D.; Wu, H.-Y.; Stoeckel, M.-A.; van der Pol, T. P.; Li, Y.; Jeong, S. Y. Ground-state electron transfer in all-polymer donor: acceptor blends enables aqueous processing of water-insoluble conjugated polymers. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14 (1), 8454. (3) Bao, Y.; Maeki, M.; Ishida, A.; Tani, H.; Tokeshi, M. Effect of organic solvents on a production of PLGA-Based drug-loaded nanoparticles using a microfluidic device. ACS omega 2022, 7 (37), 33079-33086. (4) Olsson, M.; Storm, R.; Björn, L.; Lilja, V.; Krupnik, L.; Chen, Y.; Naidjonoka, P.; Diaz, A.; Holler, M.; Watts, B. Phase-separated polymer blends for controlled drug delivery by tuning morphology. Commun. Mater. 2024, 5 (1), 231. (5) Bovone, G.; Cousin, L.; Steiner, F.; Tibbitt, M. W. Solvent controls nanoparticle size during nanoprecipitation by limiting block copolymer assembly. Macromolecules 2022, 55 (18), 8040-8048. (6) Zhang, P.; Liu, Y.; Feng, G.; Li, C.; Zhou, J.; Du, C.; Bai, Y.; Hu, S.; Huang, T.; Wang, G. Controlled Interfacial Polymer Self‐Assembly Coordinates Ultrahigh Drug Loading and Zero‐Order Release in Particles Prepared under Continuous Flow. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35 (22), 2211254. (7) Lloyd, E. C.; Dhakal, S.; Amini, S.; Alhasan, R.; Fratzl, P.; Tree, D. R.; Morozova, S.; Hickey, R. J. Porous hierarchically ordered hydrogels demonstrating structurally dependent mechanical properties. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16 (1), 3792. (8) Han, P.-C.; Chuang, C.-H.; Lin, S.-W.; Xiang, X.; Wang, Z.; Kuzumoto, M.; Tokuda, S.; Tateishi, T.; Legrand, A.; Tsang, M. Y. Phase-transformable metal-organic polyhedra for membrane processing and switchable gas separation. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15 (1), 9523. (9) Chen, G.; Chen, C.; Guo, Y.; Chu, Z.; Pan, Y.; Liu, G.; Liu, G.; Han, Y.; Jin, W.; Xu, N. Solid-solvent processing of ultrathin, highly loaded mixed-matrix membrane for gas separation. Science 2023, 381 (6664), 1350-1356. (10) Guo, Z.; Li, W.; Wu, H.; Cao, L.; Song, S.; Ma, X.; Shi, J.; Ren, Y.; Huang, T.; Li, Y. Reverse filling approach to mixed matrix covalent organic framework membranes for gas separation. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16 (1), 3617. (11) Hansen, C. M. Hansen Solubility Parameters; 2007. (12) Wilhelm, E. Mitigating Complexity: Cohesion Parameters and Related Topics. I: The Hildebrand Solubility Parameter. J. Solut. Chem. 2018, 47 (10), 1626-1709. (13) Venkatram, S.; Kim, C.; Chandrasekaran, A.; Ramprasad, R. Critical Assessment of the Hildebrand and Hansen Solubility Parameters for Polymers. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2019, 59 (10), 4188-4194. (14) Goudarzi, N.; Arab Chamjangali, M.; Amin, A. H. Calculation of Hildebrand solubility parameters of some polymers using QSPR methods based on LS-SVM technique and theoretical molecular descriptors. Chin. J. Polym. Sci. 2014, 32 (5), 587-594. (15) Marcus, Y. The properties of organic liquids that are relevant to their use as solvating solvents. Chem. Soc. Rev.1993, 22 (6), 409-416. (16) Martin, A.; Newburger, J.; Adjei, A. Extended Hildebrand solubility approach: Solubility of theophylline in polar binary solvents. J. Pharm. Sci. 1980, 69 (5), 487-491. (17) Mathieu, D. Pencil and Paper Estimation of Hansen Solubility Parameters. ACS Omega 2018, 3 (12), 17049-17056. (18) Nistane, J.; Chen, L.; Lee, Y.; Lively, R.; Ramprasad, R. Estimation of the Flory-Huggins interaction parameter of polymer-solvent mixtures using machine learning. MRS Communications 2022, 12 (6), 1096-1102. (19) Xu, J.; Liu, H.; Li, W.; Zou, H.; Xu, W. Application of QSPR to Binary Polymer/Solvent Mixtures: Prediction of Flory‐Huggins Parameters. Macromol. Theory Simul. 2008, 17 (9), 470-477. (20) Rubinstein, M.; Colby, R. H. Polymer physics; Oxford university press, 2003. (21) Mark, J. E. Physical Properties of Polymers Handbook; Springer, 2007. (22) Adamska, K.; Voelkel, A. Hansen solubility parameters for polyethylene glycols by inverse gas chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2006, 1132 (1-2), 260-267. (23) Durrant, J. D.; Amaro, R. E. Machine‐learning techniques applied to antibacterial drug discovery. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2015, 85 (1), 14-21. (24) Faulon, J.-L.; Faure, L. In silico, in vitro, and in vivo machine learning in synthetic biology and metabolic engineering. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2021, 65, 85-92. (25) Johnson, E. O.; Hung, D. T. A point of inflection and reflection on systems chemical biology. ACS Chem. Biol. 2019, 14 (12), 2497-2511. (26) Urbina, F.; Puhl, A. C.; Ekins, S. Recent advances in drug repurposing using machine learning. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2021, 65, 74-84. (27) Muller, C.; Rabal, O.; Diaz Gonzalez, C. Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning in real-life drug design cases. Artificial intelligence in drug design 2022, 383-407. (28) Peña‐Guerrero, J.; Nguewa, P. A.; García‐Sosa, A. T. Machine learning, artificial intelligence, and data science breaking into drug design and neglected diseases. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 2021, 11 (5), e1513. (29) Staszak, M.; Staszak, K.; Wieszczycka, K.; Bajek, A.; Roszkowski, K.; Tylkowski, B. Machine learning in drug design: Use of artificial intelligence to explore the chemical structure–biological activity relationship. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 2022, 12 (2), e1568. (30) Yu, H.-Y.; Muthiah, B.; Li, S.-C.; Yu, W.-Y.; Li, Y.-P. Surface characterization of cerium oxide catalysts using deep learning with infrared spectroscopy of CO. Mater. Today Sustain. 2023, 24, 100534. (31) Chen, L.-Y.; Li, Y.-P. Machine learning-guided strategies for reaction conditions design and optimization. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2024, 20 (1), 2476-2492. (32) Chen, L.-Y.; Li, Y.-P. Enhancing chemical synthesis: a two-stage deep neural network for predicting feasible reaction conditions. J. Cheminform. 2024, 16 (1), 11. (33) Chen, L.-Y.; Li, Y.-P. AutoTemplate: enhancing chemical reaction datasets for machine learning applications in organic chemistry. J. Cheminform. 2024, 16 (1), 74. (34) Chang, Y.-C.; Li, Y.-P. Integrating Chemical Information into Reinforcement Learning for Enhanced Molecular Geometry Optimization. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2023, 19 (23), 8598-8609. (35) Liang, Z.; Tan, Z.; Hong, R.; Ouyang, W.; Yuan, J.; Zhang, C. Automatically Predicting Material Properties with Microscopic Images: Polymer Miscibility as an Example. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2023, 63 (19), 5971-5980. (36) Ethier, J. G.; Casukhela, R. K.; Latimer, J. J.; Jacobsen, M. D.; Rasin, B.; Gupta, M. K.; Baldwin, L. A.; Vaia, R. A. Predicting Phase Behavior of Linear Polymers in Solution Using Machine Learning. Macromolecules 2022, 55 (7), 2691-2702. (37) Chandrasekaran, A.; Kim, C.; Venkatram, S.; Ramprasad, R. A Deep Learning Solvent-Selection Paradigm Powered by a Massive Solvent/Nonsolvent Database for Polymers. Macromolecules 2020, 53 (12), 4764-4769. (38) Kern, J.; Venkatram, S.; Banerjee, M.; Brettmann, B.; Ramprasad, R. Solvent selection for polymers enabled by generalized chemical fingerprinting and machine learning. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2022, 24 (43), 26547-26555. (39) Aoki, Y.; Wu, S.; Tsurimoto, T.; Hayashi, Y.; Minami, S.; Tadamichi, O.; Shiratori, K.; Yoshida, R. Multitask Machine Learning to Predict Polymer–Solvent Miscibility Using Flory–Huggins Interaction Parameters. Macromolecules 2023, 56 (14), 5446-5456. (40) Heid, E.; Greenman, K. P.; Chung, Y.; Li, S. C.; Graff, D. E.; Vermeire, F. H.; Wu, H.; Green, W. H.; McGill, C. J. Chemprop: A Machine Learning Package for Chemical Property Prediction. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2024, 64 (1), 9-17. (41) Yang, K.; Swanson, K.; Jin, W.; Coley, C.; Eiden, P.; Gao, H.; Guzman-Perez, A.; Hopper, T.; Kelley, B.; Mathea, M.; et al. Analyzing Learned Molecular Representations for Property Prediction. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2019, 59 (8), 3370-3388. (42) Li, S.-C.; Wu, H.; Menon, A.; Spiekermann, K. A.; Li, Y.-P.; Green, W. H. When do quantum mechanical descriptors help graph neural networks to predict chemical properties? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146 (33), 23103-23120. (43) Muthiah, B.; Li, S.-C.; Li, Y.-P. Developing machine learning models for accurate prediction of radiative efficiency of greenhouse gases. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2023, 151, 105123. (44) Lin, Y.-H.; Liang, H.-H.; Lin, S.-T.; Li, Y.-P. Advancing vapor pressure prediction: A machine learning approach with directed message passing neural networks. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2024, 105926. (45) Chang, H.-C.; Tsai, M.-H.; Li, Y.-P. Enhancing Activation Energy Predictions under Data Constraints Using Graph Neural Networks. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2024. (46) Yang, C.-I.; Li, Y.-P. Explainable uncertainty quantifications for deep learning-based molecular property prediction. J. Cheminform. 2023, 15 (1), 13. (47) Chen, L.-Y.; Li, Y.-P. Uncertainty quantification with graph neural networks for efficient molecular design. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16 (1), 3262. (48) Chung, Y.; Vermeire, F. H.; Wu, H.; Walker, P. J.; Abraham, M. H.; Green, W. H. Group contribution and machine learning approaches to predict Abraham solute parameters, solvation free energy, and solvation enthalpy. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2022, 62 (3), 433-446. (49) Vermeire, F. H.; Chung, Y.; Green, W. H. Predicting solubility limits of organic solutes for a wide range of solvents and temperatures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144 (24), 10785-10797. (50) Van der Maaten, L.; Hinton, G. Visualizing data using t-SNE. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2008, 9 (11). (51) Chen, L.-Y.; Li, Y.-P. Machine Learning Applications in Chemical Kinetics and Thermochemistry. Machine Learning in Molecular Sciences, Springer, 2023; pp 203-226. (52) Chen, L.-Y.; Hsu, T.-W.; Hsiung, T.-C.; Li, Y.-P. Deep learning-based increment theory for formation enthalpy predictions. J. Phys. Chem. A 2022, 126 (41), 7548-7556. (53) RandomForestClassifier. Available from: https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.ensemble.RandomForestClassifier.html (accessed 2025-04-03) (54) XGBoost Documentation; Available from: https://xgboost.readthedocs.io/en/release_3.0.0/ (accessed 2025-04-03) (55) James Bergstra, R. B., Yoshua Bengio, Balázs Kégl. Algorithms for Hyper-Parameter Optimization. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. 2011, 24. (56) Miller-Chou, B. A.; Koenig, J. L. A review of polymer dissolution. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2003, 28 (8), 1223-1270. (57) Knopp, M. M.; Olesen, N. E.; Holm, P.; Langguth, P.; Holm, R.; Rades, T. Influence of polymer molecular weight on drug–polymer solubility: a comparison between experimentally determined solubility in PVP and prediction derived from solubility in monomer. J. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 104 (9), 2905-2912. (58) Qian, C.; Mumby, S. J.; Eichinger, B. E. Phase diagrams of binary polymer solutions and blends. Macromolecules 1991, 24 (7), 1655-1661. (59) Cuomo, S.; Di Cola, V. S.; Giampaolo, F.; Rozza, G.; Raissi, M.; Piccialli, F. Scientific Machine Learning Through Physics–Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What’s Next. J. Sci. Comput. 2022, 92 (3). (60) Hayashi, Y.; Shiomi, J.; Morikawa, J.; Yoshida, R. RadonPy: automated physical property calculation using all-atom classical molecular dynamics simulations for polymer informatics. npj Comput. Mater.2022, 8 (1), 222. (61) RDKit. Available from: https://www.rdkit.org/ (accessed 2025-04-03) (62) Knychała, P.; Timachova, K.; Banaszak, M.; Balsara, N. P. 50th Anniversary Perspective: Phase Behavior of Polymer Solutions and Blends. Macromolecules 2017, 50 (8), 3051-3065. (63) Qian, D.; Michaels, T. C.; Knowles, T. P. Analytical solution to the Flory–Huggins model. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2022, 13 (33), 7853-7860. (64) Binary Polymer Solution Cloud Point Database. https://pppdb.uchicago.edu/cloudapp (accessed 2025-07-07) (65) Benguergoura, H.; Allel, A.; Saeed, W. S.; Aouak, T. Capillary column inverse gas chromatography to determine the thermodynamic parameters of binary solvent poly (styrene-block-butadiene) rubber systems. Arab. J. Chem. 2021, 14 (4), 103040. (66) Aşkın, A.; Altınbaş, S.; Giacinti Baschetti, M. Diffusion of organic solvents in thermoplastic elastomers: infinite dilution experiments. Polym. Bull. 2025, 82 (3), 817-835. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/98528 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 聚合物-溶劑交互作用的準確預測對於聚合物加工、藥物傳輸與膜分離等應用具有重要意義。Flory-Huggins 作用力參數(χ參數)為衡量聚合物與溶劑相容性的重要指標,然而,其實驗測定往往成本高昂且耗時。本研究提出一套以導向式訊息傳遞神經網路(Directed Message Passing Neural Networks, D-MPNN)為基礎的機器學習框架,能夠從聚合物之單體結構、溶劑結構、溫度與體積分率等資訊直接預測χ參數。我們系統性地評估不同的分子特徵表示方式,以及經驗公式的整合方式,以優化預測準確性。在多種模型中,納入溫度與體積分率資訊的 D-MPNN-TC-sum 模型展現最佳表現(MAE = 0.092,RMSE = 0.162,R² = 0.926),並優於依賴預先計算之指紋與人工特徵的傳統描述子模型。此外,將 Flory-Huggins 理論融入分類架構後,亦能有效預測聚合物與溶劑的相容性, F1分數達 0.915。進一步透過t-分佈隨機鄰近嵌入法(t-distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding, t-SNE)視覺化分析顯示,導向式訊息傳遞神經網路能夠捕捉芳香性與環狀結構等關鍵分子特徵,進一步強化模型對聚合物-溶劑交互作用的理解。本研究突顯導向式訊息傳遞神經網路在分子性質預測上的優勢,並說明體積分率為影響相容性預測的重要因素之一。此方法具有良好的可擴展性與可解釋性,為聚合物科學中的機器學習應用提供一個具體可行的架構,有助於推動數據驅動的溶劑選擇與聚合物設計。本篇研究同步發表在ChemRxiv上。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Accurate prediction of polymer–solvent interactions is important in applications such as polymer manufacturing, drug delivery, and membrane separations. The Flory–Huggins interaction parameter (χ) is widely used as a key indicator of polymer–solvent compatibility; however, its experimental acquisition is time-consuming and costly. In this thesis, we propose a machine learning framework based on Directed Message Passing Neural Networks (D-MPNNs) to predict χ parameters directly from monomer structures, solvent structures, temperature, and volume fraction. The methodology systematically explores molecular representation techniques, pooling strategies, and the integration of empirical equations to optimize prediction accuracy. Among the models, the D-MPNN-TC-sum architecture, which includes both temperature and volume fraction as input features, shows strong predictive performance (MAE = 0.092, RMSE = 0.162, R² = 0.926) compared to traditional fingerprint-based models that rely on precomputed descriptors. Furthermore, by incorporating the Flory–Huggins equation into a classification framework, the model achieves highly accurate miscibility classification, with an F1 score of 0.915. Visualization of the learned representations using t-distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) reveals that the model effectively captures structural features, such as aromaticity and cyclic structures, that influence polymer–solvent interactions. Overall, the study illustrates the potential of D-MPNNs in predicting thermodynamic properties and provides an interpretable approach for data-driven solvent selection and polymer design. This work is also available as a preprint on ChemRxiv. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-08-14T16:27:57Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-08-14T16:27:57Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 #
誌謝 ii 中文摘要 iii ABSTRACT iv CONTENTS v LIST OF FIGURES vii LIST OF TABLES ix Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Research Focus 2 1.3 Theoretical Background 3 1.3.1 Flory–Huggins Theory 3 1.3.2 Definition and Experimental Determination of the Interaction Parameter χ 4 1.4 Applications of Machine Learning in Polymer Solubility Prediction 5 1.5 Motivation and Objectives of This Study 7 Chapter 2 Methodology 8 2.1 Research Workflow 8 2.2 Data Sources and Splitting 9 2.3 Model Architecture 10 2.4 Hyperparameter Optimization 14 2.4.1 Hyperparameter Optimization of D-MPNN series models 14 2.4.2 Hyperparameter Optimization of Morgan series models 15 2.5 Phase Diagram 17 2.6 Classification of miscible and immiscible pair 18 2.7 Model Evaluation Metrics 19 2.8 t-SNE Visualization 21 Chapter 3 Results and Discussion 24 3.1 Evaluation of Model Architectures and Predictive Performance 24 3.2 Impact of Feature Representation and Pooling Methods 26 3.3 Comparison of Multitask Deep Learning and D-MPNNs for Predicting Polymer-Solvent Interaction Parameters 30 3.4 Phase Diagram Prediction with χ in Flory-Huggins Equations 31 3.5 Solvation Behavior Prediction with χ in Flory-Huggins Equations 35 3.6 Visualizing the Connection between Chemical Structure and Interaction Parameters 36 Chapter 4 Conclusion 38 APPENDIX 42 REFERENCE 77 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject | 圖神經網路 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 分子性質預測 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Flory–Huggins 交互作用參數 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 溶解行為預測 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 聚合物-溶劑相容性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 導向式訊息傳遞神經網路 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Flory–Huggins interaction parameter | en |
| dc.subject | Graph neural network (GNN) | en |
| dc.subject | Molecular properties prediction | en |
| dc.subject | Solubility prediction | en |
| dc.subject | Directed Message Passing Neural Network (D-MPNN) | en |
| dc.subject | Polymer–solvent compatibility | en |
| dc.title | 導向式訊息傳遞神經網路於聚合物溶劑交互作用參數之預測 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Directed Message Passing Neural Networks for Accurate Prediction of Polymer-Solvent Interaction Parameters | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李奕霈;許良彥 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Yi-Pei Li;Liang-Yan Hsu | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 聚合物-溶劑相容性,Flory–Huggins 交互作用參數,溶解行為預測,導向式訊息傳遞神經網路,圖神經網路,分子性質預測, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Polymer–solvent compatibility,Flory–Huggins interaction parameter,Solubility prediction,Directed Message Passing Neural Network (D-MPNN),Graph neural network (GNN),Molecular properties prediction, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 84 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202502542 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-08-01 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 化學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | N/A | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 化學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.95 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
