Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 生物產業傳播暨發展學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/98427
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor黃麗君zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorLi-Chun Huangen
dc.contributor.author吳泰瑩zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorTai-Ying Wuen
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-05T16:19:57Z-
dc.date.available2025-08-06-
dc.date.copyright2025-08-05-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.date.submitted2025-07-31-
dc.identifier.citation中文參考文獻

陳佩紋(2010)。企業如何藉由碳標籤提升品牌形象。國立台灣大學碩士論文。
行政院環境保護署(2011)。碳足跡標籤的政策推動與實施狀況報告。台北:行政院環保署。
行政院環境保護署(2013)。產品碳足跡資訊網。取自 https://cfp.epa.gov.tw/
行政院環境保護署(2014)。全民綠生活行動方案。台北:行政院環保署。
行政院(2021)。全民綠生活。台北:行政院。
范懿文、陳美卿、李宗儒(2012)。探討綠色產品消費意願:環保標章之調節效果。國立高雄應用科技大學碩士論文。
何佳潔(2013)。碳標籤標示對消費者綠色購買意願之影響:碳標籤有用嗎?國立政治大學碩士論文。
何佳潔(2014)。碳標籤標示對消費者綠色購買意願之影響:碳標籤有用嗎?國立政治大學碩士論文。
郭霆(2011)。產品碳標籤之消費者認知及業者效益之研究。國立台北科技大學碩士論文。
江秀娥、張世勛、張東海(2014)。推動臺灣農產品碳標籤可行性之研究─以米產品碳標籤為例。農業經濟叢刊,20(3),57-87。
劉語宸(2023)。擬社會互動對購買意願的影響:檢視認知信任的中介角色及網紅與品牌的匹配性和假帳號的干擾效果。國立政治大學碩士論文。
林君怡、林子倫、楊政峰(2012)。碳標籤產品消費決策因素之研究。環境保護學刊,34,43-58。
劉興榮(2010)。農業行銷策略之探討。農業推廣期刊,54,1-12。
鍾佩珊(2011)。碳標籤飲料之綠色消費行為研究。國立台灣科技大學碩士論文。
游尊惟(2020)。知覺品質與知覺價值對購買意願影響之研究-以冷萃咖啡為例。國立高雄科技大學碩士論文。
沈品妤(2023)。農業網紅與消費者擬社會互動之關聯性及其對購買意願的影響。國立中興大學碩士論文。
蔡明峰(2011)。環保標章資訊對消費者行為影響之研究。國立台灣大學碩士論文。
詹琇宇(2022)。擬社會互動與知覺真實性對購買意願之影響-以故事行銷為例。國立中山大學碩士論文。
王紹蓉(2022)。探索行動直播平臺的社會支持因素:擬社會互動與遠距臨場感觀點。新聞學研究,153,99-140。
黃竹芸(2021)。Podcast 節目中的關係建立:自我揭露與擬社會互動關係。國立政治大學碩士論文。
吳文貴、何佳潔(2014)。碳標籤的推廣對消費者購買行為的影響。國立政治大學碩士論文。
吳以建、盧虎生(2010)。米產品碳足跡排放及其減碳潛力之探討。農業推廣期刊,54,15-20。
聯合報(2023)。網紅行銷如何助攻農產品?取自https://udn.com/
農傳媒(2024)。青農林柏賢透過西瓜認養成功拓展市場。取自https://www.agriharvest.tw/](https://www.agriharvest.tw/
商業週刊(2023)。短影音為什麼讓你「越滑越笨」?取自 https://www.businessweekly.com.tw/
環境資訊中心(2024)。西瓜認養活動推動在地農業。取自[https://e-info.org.tw/](https://e-info.org.tw/)
風清揚(2019)。農會整合線上與線下電商行銷模式。取自https://www.agriharvest.tw/
英文參考文獻

Ahmad, S. N. B., & Thyagaraj, K. S. (2015). Consumer’s intention to purchase green products: Insights from Malaysia. Serials Publications, 12(4), 10-17.
Aitken, R., Watkins, L., Williams, J., & Kean, A. (2020). The influence of eco-labeling on consumer preferences: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 120374.
Albino, V., Balice, A., & Dangelico, R. M. (2009). Environmental strategies and green product development: An overview on sustainability‐driven companies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(2), 83-96.
Alexa. (2019). Top sites. Retrieved from https://www.alexa.com/topsites
Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (2000). Knowledge calibration: What consumers know and what they think they know. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(2), 123-156.
Ansu-Mensah, P. (2021). Green product awareness effect on green purchase intentions of university students: An emerging market’s perspective. Journal of Sustainable Marketing, 3(1), 15-30.
Aw, E. C. X., & Labrecque, L. I. (2020). Celebrity endorsement in social media contexts: Understanding the role of parasocial interactions and the need to belong. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 37(7), 869-879.
Auter, P. J., & Moore, R. L. (1993). Buying on the air: How the medium influences consumer response to televised shopping. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 37(1), 53-65.
Brucks, M. (1985). The effects of product class knowledge on information search behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(1), 1-16.
Brown, W. J. (2015). Examining four processes of audience involvement with media personae: Transportation, parasocial interaction, identification, and worship. Communication Theory, 25(3), 259-283.

Chen, Y. S. (2015). The impact of social media on consumer-brand relationships. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 29, 13-25.
Chen, Y., Nguyen, T. H., & Nguyen, L. H. (2022). Factors influencing consumers’ intention to purchase carbon-labeled food products: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Sustainability, 14(11), 6789.
Digital Marketing Institute. (n.d.). Video marketing: The complete guide. Retrieved from https://digitalmarketinginstitute.com/
Dunkel-Schetter, C., & Skokan, L. A. (1990). Determinants of social support provision in personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7(4), 437-450.
Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D., & Miniard, P. W. (1995). Consumer behavior (8th ed.). Dryden Press.
Fan, X., Li, Y., Sun, S., & Li, Y. (2020). Methane emissions from paddy fields: A global synthesis. Environmental Research Letters, 15(6), 065002.
Ferchaud, A., Grzeslo, J., Orme, S., & LaGroue, J. (2018). Parasocial attributes and YouTube personalities: Exploring content trends across the most popular vlogs. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 88-96.
Fu, S., Lin, L., & Hsiao, Y. (2019). Consumer trust and parasocial interaction on short video platforms. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 35(11), 963-973.
Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos. Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale Conference, 41-50.
Hartmann, T., & Goldhoorn, C. (2011). Horton and Wohl revisited: Exploring viewers’ experience of parasocial interaction. Journal of Communication, 61(6), 1104-1121.

Horton, D., & Strauss, A. L. (1957). Interaction in audience-participation shows. American Journal of Sociology, 62(6), 579-587.
Horton, D., & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and parasocial interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215-229.
Kurtin, K. S., O’Brien, N. A., Roy, D. A., & Dam, L. (2018). Parasocial relationship development with YouTube influencers: The role of social media use and motives. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 256-264.
Labrecque, L. I. (2014). Fostering consumer-brand relationships in social media environments: The role of parasocial interaction. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(2), 134-148.
Lee, M. K. O., & Turban, E. (2001). A trust model for consumer internet shopping. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(1), 75-91.
Lees, M. M., & Watkins, B. A. (2016). YouTube vlogging: Parasocial interaction, authenticity and brand endorsement effectiveness. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 33, 156-163.
Li, H. (2017). Green consumption and collectivism culture: A study on green consumer behaviors in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(4), 361-371.
Liang, Y., Lu, J., & Wang, D. (2020). Understanding consumers' carbon label knowledge and purchase intention. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120690.
Linquist, B. A., van Groenigen, K. J., Adviento-Borbe, M. A., Pittelkow, C., & van Kessel, C. (2012). An agronomic assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from major cereal crops. Global Change Biology, 18(1), 194-209.
Nguyen, T. N., Lobo, A., & Greenland, S. (2020). The influence of environmental value orientations and perceived brand green value on purchase intention. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 55, 102089.
Penttinen, M., Koskela, M., & Paavilainen, M. (2022). Consumers’ online parasocial interaction in product reviews: The impact of self-disclosure and interactivity on source credibility and purchase intention. Computers in Human Behavior, 127, 107067.
Polonsky, M. J., Vocino, A., Grau, S. L., Garma, R., & Ferdous, A. S. (2012). The impact of general and carbon-related environmental knowledge on attitudes and behaviour of US consumers. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(3-4), 238-263.
Rasmussen, L. (2018). Parasocial interaction in the digital age: An examination of relationship building and the effectiveness of YouTube celebrities. The Journal of Social Media in Society, 7(1), 280-294.
Rondoni, A., & Grasso, S. (2021). Labelling for sustainability: A review on consumer decision-making and green food choice. Sustainability, 13(14), 7735.
Rubin, A. M., & McHugh, M. P. (1987). Development of parasocial interaction relationships. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 31(3), 279-292.
Rubin, R. B., Perse, E. M., & Powell, R. A. (1985). Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing. Human Communication Research, 12(2), 155-180.
Shao, G., & Lee, S. (2020). The effect of Chinese adolescents' motivation to use TikTok on satisfaction and continuous use intention. Young Consumers, 21(4), 463-478.
Segev, S., Fernandes, J., & Hong, C. (2015). Effects of gain versus loss message framing and point of reference on consumer responses to green advertising. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 36(1), 35-51.
Shah, A., Aziz, J., Jaffari, A. R., Waris, S., Ejaz, W., Fatima, M., & Sherazi, S. K. (2012). The impact of brands on consumer purchase intentions. Asian Journal of Business Management, 4(2), 105-110.
Tariq, M. I., Jan, M. T., Ahmad, N., & Haque, A. U. (2019). Organic food consumerism through social commerce in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 31(1), 202-222.
Tian, Q., & Hoffner, C. (2010). Parasocial interaction with liked, neutral, and disliked characters on a popular TV series. Mass Communication and Society, 13(3), 250-269.
Tian, W., Zhang, W., & Chen, W. (2023). Impact of short video addiction on college students' learning: The mediating role of flow experience. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 47-64.
Wei, W., & Wang, L. (2020). Research on factors influencing short video users' stickiness: Taking Douyin (TikTok) as an example. Journal of Digital Convergence, 18(4), 79-88.
Wei, W., & Wang, L. (2022). Factors affecting users’ continuous intention to use short video platforms: The case of Douyin. Technology in Society, 68, 101857.
Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. E. (1996). Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on the earth. New Society Publishers.
Yang, S., Zhao, Y., & Ma, Y. (2019). Analysis of the reasons and countermeasures for the popularity of short videos among college students. Journal of Educational Research and Policies, 5(3), 54-59.
Zhang, L., Zhang, D., & Wang, L. (2019). Exploring short-form video application addiction: Socio-technical and attachment perspectives. Telematics and Informatics, 42, 101243.
Zhao, Z., & Khan, M. A. (2022). The students’ flow experience with the continuous intention of using online English platforms: A moderated mediation model. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 19(2), 175-197.
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/98427-
dc.description.abstract隨著氣候變遷議題備受關注,消費者對環境友善產品的接受度與購買意願逐漸成為永續行銷的研究重點。碳標籤制度作為一種揭露產品生命週期碳足跡的政策工具,雖具備環境溝通功能,但其傳播效果往往受限於大眾對其認知程度與接受度。社群媒體興起後,短影音(Shorts)逐漸成為重要的資訊傳播形式,然不同長度的影音內容在說服效果上是否存在顯著差異,仍有待實證驗證。本研究以碳標籤米產品為主題,採用準實驗設計,針對「影片長度」這一變項進行操弄,分為長影片與短影片兩組,探討其對消費者「擬社會互動」、「碳標籤知識」(主觀與客觀)與「購買意願」的影響,並進一步分析不同年齡與學歷背景族群在此影響路徑中的反應差異。本研究於 2024 年 4 月至 6 月間透過網路平台進行問卷調查,回收有效樣本 323 份。資料分析透過 SPSS,包括描述性統計、配對樣本t 檢定、獨立樣本t 檢定、結構方程模型(SEM)與多元線性迴歸等。
研究結果顯示,影片長度對購買意願本身未具顯著直接效果,然而透過「擬社會互動」與「碳標籤知識」變項的整體模型驗證,長影片能有效提升「認知互動」與「情感互動」的程度,進而正向預測購買意願。此外,長影片亦顯著提升「客觀知識」水準,而短影片在資訊吸收效果上相對有限;「主觀知識」則無顯著差異。進一步比較不同背景變項發現,年齡 40 歲以下與大學以上學歷族群,在模型中的路徑係數顯著且解釋力較高,而高中職以下與年長族群雖亦呈現部分正向趨勢,惟影響力與模式穩定性較低。在碳標籤與永續產品溝通過程中,影音內容不僅需傳達資訊,更需建立情感連結與可信度,方能有效促進消費者行動。未來在政策設計與永續教育推廣上,可針對不同受眾設計差異化影音內容,並強化資訊與情感並行的傳播策略,提升碳標籤制度的社會影響力與實務應用效果。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractAs climate change and sustainability issues become increasingly urgent, consumer acceptance and purchase intention for environmentally friendly products have become key areas in green marketing research. Carbon labeling, which discloses the carbon footprint of products throughout their life cycle, is one such communication tool aimed at influencing consumer behavior. However, the effectiveness of carbon labels depends not only on informational clarity but also on how they are delivered. In the era of social media, the rise of short-form videos like YouTube Shorts raises questions about whether video length influences consumer engagement and comprehension. This study explores how video length affects parasocial interaction, carbon label knowledge (both subjective and objective), and purchase intention. Using carbon-labeled rice products as the experimental context, we employed a randomized quasi-experimental design that compared the effects of a long-format video (90 seconds) and a short-format video (30 seconds). Data were collected through an online survey from April to June 2024, yielding 323 valid responses after excluding incomplete, underage, and elderly participants. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS and AMOS software, applying descriptive statistics, independent and paired sample t-tests, structural equation modeling (SEM), and multiple regression analysis to investigate group differences and test the hypothesized model.
The findings indicate that video length does not exert a significant direct effect on purchase intention. However, long videos significantly enhance cognitive and affective parasocial interactions, which in turn strongly predict purchase intention. Long videos also lead to significant gains in objective carbon label knowledge, while subjective knowledge remains relatively unchanged across conditions. Among different demographic groups, younger participants (under 40) and those with higher education levels (college and above) demonstrate stronger model fit and predictive pathways compared to older or less-educated participants.
These results suggest that both emotional connection and informational gain are essential in shaping sustainable consumption behavior. The study emphasizes the need for customized communication strategies that align video content with the cognitive and emotional preferences of different audiences. Practical implications are offered for video-based sustainability education, policy messaging, and future research directions in environmental communication.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-08-05T16:19:57Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2025-08-05T16:19:57Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
圖次 vi
表次 vii
壹、 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機 3
第三節 研究目的 5
第二章、文獻探討 6
第一節 短影音 6
第二節 擬社會互動 9
第三節 碳標籤 12
第四節 購買意願 17
第三章、研究方法 21
第一節 研究架構 21
第二節 變數操作型定義與衡量 22
第三節 實驗設計 27
第四節 抽樣對象與抽樣方法 32
第五節 統計方法 33
第四章、資料分析與討論 35
第一節、人口背景統計分析 35
第二節、樣本隨機分配檢驗 36
第三節、研究假設模型驗證 38
第五章、結論與建議 58
第一節 研究結果與討論 58
第二節 實務意涵 60
第三節 研究限制與建議 62
中文參考文獻 66
英文參考文獻 68
附錄 問卷 74
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subject碳標籤zh_TW
dc.subject購買意願zh_TW
dc.subject影片長度zh_TW
dc.subject擬社會互動zh_TW
dc.subject碳標籤知識zh_TW
dc.subject結構方程模型zh_TW
dc.subjectvideo lengthen
dc.subjectcarbon labelingen
dc.subjectstructural equation modelingen
dc.subjectcarbon label knowledgeen
dc.subjectparasocial interactionen
dc.subjectpurchase intentionen
dc.titleYouTube影音長短、擬社會互動與碳標籤知識對購買意願的影響:以碳標籤米產品影片為例zh_TW
dc.titleThe Effects of YouTube Video Length, Parasocial Interaction, and Carbon Label Knowledge on Purchase Intention in Carbon-Labeled Rice Product Videosen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear113-2-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee胡明哲;林如森zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeMing-Che Hu;Ju-Sen Linen
dc.subject.keyword碳標籤,購買意願,影片長度,擬社會互動,碳標籤知識,結構方程模型,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordcarbon labeling,purchase intention,video length,parasocial interaction,carbon label knowledge,structural equation modeling,en
dc.relation.page78-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202503098-
dc.rights.note同意授權(限校園內公開)-
dc.date.accepted2025-08-04-
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept生物產業傳播暨發展學系-
dc.date.embargo-lift2030-07-31-
顯示於系所單位:生物產業傳播暨發展學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-113-2.pdf
  未授權公開取用
2.88 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved