請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/98350完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張瑞峰 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Ruey-Feng Chang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 吳國禎 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Kuo-Chen Wu | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-08-04T16:07:36Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-08-05 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-08-04 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-07-30 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | [1] R. L. Siegel, K. D. Miller, N. S. Wagle, and A. Jemal, “Cancer statistics, 2023,” (in eng), CA Cancer J Clin, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 17-48, Jan. 2023, https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21763
[2] B. Kumar et al., “EGFR, p16, HPV Titer, Bcl-xL and p53, sex, and smoking as indicators of response to therapy and survival in oropharyngeal cancer,” (in eng), J Clin Oncol, vol. 26, no. 19, pp. 3128-37, Jul. 1 2008, https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2007.12.7662 [3] D. Hanahan and R. A. Weinberg, “Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation,” (in eng), Cell, vol. 144, no. 5, pp. 646-74, Mar. 4 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013 [4] M. Gerlinger and C. Swanton, “How darwinian models inform therapeutic failure initiated by clonal heterogeneity in cancer medicine,” (in eng), Br J Cancer, vol. 103, no. 8, pp. 1139-43, Oct. 12 2010, https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605912 [5] L. Welsh et al., “Prospective, longitudinal, multi-modal functional imaging for radical chemo-IMRT treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer: the INSIGHT study,” Radiation Oncology, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 112, May 2015, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0415-7 [6] M. Hatt et al., “18F-FDG PET uptake characterization through texture analysis: investigating the complementary nature of heterogeneity and functional tumor volume in a multi-cancer site patient cohort,” (in eng), J Nucl Med, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 38-44, Jan. 2015, https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.114.144055 [7] S. W. Chen et al., “Correlation of pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET tumor textural features with gene expression in pharyngeal cancer and implications for radiotherapy-based treatment outcomes,” (in eng), Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 567-580, Apr. 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-016-3580-5 [8] S. Alobaidli, S. McQuaid, C. South, V. Prakash, P. Evans, and A. Nisbet, “The role of texture analysis in imaging as an outcome predictor and potential tool in radiotherapy treatment planning,” (in eng), Br J Radiol, vol. 87, no. 1042, p. 20140369, Oct. 2014, https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20140369 [9] A. Zwanenburg, “Radiomics in nuclear medicine: robustness, reproducibility, standardization, and how to avoid data analysis traps and replication crisis,” (in eng), Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, vol. 46, no. 13, pp. 2638-2655, Dec. 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04391-8 [10] N. Fujima et al., “Prediction of the local treatment outcome in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma using deep learning analysis of pretreatment FDG-PET images,” BMC Cancer, vol. 21, no. 1, p. 900, Aug. 6 2021, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08599-6 [11] A. Diamant, A. Chatterjee, M. Vallières, G. Shenouda, and J. Seuntjens, “Deep learning in head & neck cancer outcome prediction,” Scientific Reports, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 2764, Feb. 26 2019, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39206-1 [12] B. N. Huynh et al., “Head and neck cancer treatment outcome prediction: a comparison between machine learning with conventional radiomics features and deep learning radiomics,” (in English), Frontiers in Medicine, Original Research vol. 10, Aug. 30 2023, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1217037 [13] C. K. Glide-Hurst et al., “Adaptive Radiation Therapy (ART) strategies and technical considerations: A state of the ART review from NRG oncology,” (in eng), Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 1054-1075, Mar. 15 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.10.021 [14] S. Nuyts et al., “Adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: Pitfalls and possibilities from the radiation oncologist's point of view,” (in eng), Cancer Med, vol. 13, no. 8, p. e7192, Apr. 2024, https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.7192 [15] R. Atun et al., “Expanding global access to radiotherapy,” (in eng), Lancet Oncol, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 1153-86, Sep. 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00222-3 [16] H. E. Morgan and D. J. Sher, “Adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck cancer,” (in eng), Cancers Head Neck, vol. 5, p. 1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41199-019-0046-z [17] J. Zhang et al., “Radiomic feature repeatability and its impact on prognostic model generalizability: A multi-institutional study on nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients,” (in eng), Radiother Oncol, vol. 183, p. 109578, Jun. 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109578 [18] B. Lou et al., “An image-based deep learning framework for individualising radiotherapy dose: A retrospective analysis of outcome prediction,” The Lancet Digital Health, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. e136-e147, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30058-5 [19] N. M. Cheng et al., “Zone-size nonuniformity of 18F-FDG PET regional textural features predicts survival in patients with oropharyngeal cancer,” (in eng), Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 419-28, Mar. 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-014-2933-1 [20] H. M. Wang et al., “Heterogeneity of (18) F-FDG PET combined with expression of EGFR may improve the prognostic stratification of advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma,” (in eng), Int J Cancer, vol. 138, no. 3, pp. 731-8, Feb. 1 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29811 [21] P. Afshar, A. Mohammadi, K. N. Plataniotis, A. Oikonomou, and H. Benali, “From handcrafted to deep-learning-based cancer radiomics: Challenges and opportunities,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 132-160, 2019. [22] N. M. Cheng et al., “Deep learning for fully automated prediction of overall survival in patients with oropharyngeal cancer using FDG-PET imaging,” (in eng), Clin Cancer Res, vol. 27, no. 14, pp. 3948-3959, Jul. 15 2021, https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-20-4935 [23] A. De Biase et al., “Deep learning-based outcome prediction using PET/CT and automatically predicted probability maps of primary tumor in patients with oropharyngeal cancer,” (in eng), Comput Methods Programs Biomed, vol. 244, p. 107939, Feb. 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107939 [24] B. Ma et al., “PET/CT based transformer model for multi-outcome prediction in oropharyngeal cancer,” Radiotherapy and Oncology, p. 110368, 2024. [25] C. T. Liao et al., “Neck dissection field and lymph node density predict prognosis in patients with oral cavity cancer and pathological node metastases treated with adjuvant therapy,” (in eng), Oral Oncol, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 329-36, Apr. 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2011.10.017 [26] A. Argiris, M. V. Karamouzis, D. Raben, and R. L. Ferris, “Head and neck cancer,” (in eng), Lancet, vol. 371, no. 9625, pp. 1695-709, May 17 2008, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60728-x [27] R. Forghani et al., “Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: prediction of cervical lymph node metastasis by dual-energy CT texture analysis with machine learning,” European Radiology, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 6172-6181, Dec. 2019, https://doi.10.1007/s00330-019-06159-y [28] S. Jiang, L. G. Locatello, G. Maggiore, and O. Gallo, “Radiomics-based analysis in the prediction of occult lymph node metastases in patients with oral cancer: A systematic review,” (in eng), J Clin Med, vol. 12, no. 15, Jul. 28 2023, https://doi.10.3390/jcm12154958 [29] D. E. Johnson, B. Burtness, C. R. Leemans, V. W. Y. Lui, J. E. Bauman, and J. R., “Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma,” Nature reviews, Disease primers, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 92., Nov. 26 2020, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-020-00224-3 [30] Global Cancer Observatory, “International Agency for Research on Cancer,” World Health Organization, https://gco.iarc.fr/ (accessed Mar.6 2025). [31] R. Lambert, C. Sauvaget, M. de Camargo Cancela, and R. Sankaranarayanan, “Epidemiology of cancer from the oral cavity and oropharynx,” European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, vol. 23, no. 8, pp.633-641, Aug. 2011, https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0b013e3283484795 [32] J. T. Johnson, E. L. Barnes, E. N. Myers, V. L. Schramm Jr., D. Borochovitz, B. A. Sigler, “The extracapsular spread of tumors in cervical node metastasis,” Arch Otolaryngol, vol. 107, pp. 725-729, Dec. 1981, https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1981.00790480001001 [33] D. R. Farquhar, A. J. Coniglio, M. M. Masood, N. Lenze, P. Brennan, D. Anantharaman, B. Abedi-Ardekani, A. M. Zanation, M. C. Weissler, A. F. Olshan, S. Sheth, and T.G. Hackman, T. G., “Evaluation of pathologic staging using number of nodes in p16-negative head and neck cancer,” Oral Oncology, vol. 108, p. 104800, Sep. 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104800 [34] C. E. Henson, A. K. Abou-Foul, D. J. Morton, L. McDowell, S. Baliga, J. Bates, A. Lee, P. Bonomo, P. Szturz, P. Nankivell, S. H. Huang, W. M. Lydiatt, B. O’Sullivan, and H. Mehanna, “Diagnostic challenges and prognostic implications of extranodal extension in head and neck cancer: A state of the art review and gap analysis,” Frontiers in Oncology, 13, p. 1263347, Sep. 20 2023, https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1263347 [35] J. G. Vartanian, J. L. Gross, and L. P. Kowalski, L. P., “Distant metastasis from head and neck cancer: Role of surgical treatment,” Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck surgery, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 114-118, Apr. 2022, https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000000789 [36] S. H. Huang, R. Chernock, B. O'Sullivan, and C. Fakhry, “Assessment criteria and clinical implications of extranodal extension in head and neck cancer,” American society of clinical oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting, vol. 41, pp. 265-278. May 19 2021, https://doi.org/10.1200/EDBK_320939 [37] J. L. Weissman, and R. Akindele, “Current imaging techniques for head and neck tumors,” Oncology (Williston Park), vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 697-713, 1999. [38] Y. Anzai, J. A. Brunberg, and R. B. Lufkin, “Imaging of nodal metastases in the head and neck,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging: JMRI, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 774-783, Nov. 17 2005. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.1880070503 [39] R. M. Merritt, M. F. Williams, T. H. James, and E. S. Porubsky, “Detection of cervical metastasis. A meta-analysis comparing computed tomography with physical examination,” Archives of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, vol. 123, no. 2, pp. 149-152, Feb. 1997, https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1997.01900020027004 [40] J. L. Roh, N. K. Yeo, J. S. Kim, J. H. Lee, K. J. Cho, S. H. Choi, S. Y. Nam, and S. Y. Kim, “Utility of 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in the preoperative staging of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma,” Oral Oncology, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 887-893, Oct. 2007, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2006.10.011 [41] R. Yeh, A. Amer, J. M. Johnson, and D. T. Ginat, “Pearls and pitfalls of 18FDG-PET head and neck imaging,” Neuroimaging Clinics of North America, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 287-298, May 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2022.01.005 [42] B. Zhang et al., “Radiomics features of multiparametric MRI as novel prognostic factors in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma,” (in eng), Clin Cancer Res, vol. 23, no. 15, pp. 4259-4269, Aug. 1 2017, https://doi.10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-16-2910 [43] B. H. Kann et al., “Pretreatment identification of head and neck cancer nodal metastasis and extranodal extension using deep learning neural networks,” Scientific Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 14036, 2018/09/19 2018, https://doi.10.1038/s41598-018-32441-y [44] A. Javanmardi et al., “Multi-modality fusion coupled with deep learning for improved outcome prediction in head and neck cancer,” in Medical Imaging 2022: Image Processing, 2022, vol. 12032: SPIE, pp. 664-668 [45] D. S. Rickman et al., “Prediction of future metastasis and molecular characterization of head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma based on transcriptome and genome analysis by microarrays,” (in eng), Oncogene, vol. 27, no. 51, pp. 6607-22, Nov 20 2008, https://doi.10.1038/onc.2008.251 [46] C.-T. Liao et al., “PET and PET/CT of the neck lymph nodes improves risk prediction in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 180-187, 2011. [47] P. G. Rose et al., “Nomograms predicting progression-free survival, overall survival, and pelvic recurrence in locally advanced cervical cancer developed from an analysis of identifiable prognostic factors in patients from NRG oncology/gynecologic oncology group randomized trials of chemoradiotherapy,” (in eng), J Clin Oncol, vol. 33, no. 19, pp. 2136-42, Jul. 1 2015, https://doi.10.1200/jco.2014.57.7122 [48] S. Kang et al., “Risk assessment tool for distant recurrence after platinum-based concurrent chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: a Korean gynecologic oncology group study,” (in eng), J Clin Oncol, vol. 30, no. 19, pp. 2369-74, Jul. 1 2012, https://doi.10.1200/jco.2011.37.5923 [49] W. C. Shen et al., “Prediction of local relapse and distant metastasis in patients with definitive chemoradiotherapy-treated cervical cancer by deep learning from [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography,” (in eng), Eur Radiol, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 6741-6749, Dec. 2019, https://doi.10.1007/s00330-019-06265-x [50] Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-Analysis Collaboration, “Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 18 randomized trials,” (in eng), J Clin Oncol, vol. 26, no. 35, pp. 5802-12, Dec. 10 2008, https://doi.10.1200/jco.2008.16.4368 [51] L. T. Tan et al., “Change in patterns of failure after image-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer: Analysis from the retroEMBRACE Study,” (in eng), Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, vol. 104, no. 4, pp. 895-902, Jul. 15 2019, https://doi.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.038. [52] K. C. Wu et al., “Early prediction of distant metastasis in patients with uterine cervical cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy by deep learning using pretreatment [18 F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography,” (in eng), Nucl Med Commun, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 196-202, Mar. 2024, https://doi.10.1097/mnm.0000000000001799 [53] K. Forrester, C. Almoguera, K. Han, W. E. Grizzle, and M. Perucho, “Detection of high incidence of K-ras oncogenes during human colon tumorigenesis,” (in eng), Nature, vol. 327, no. 6120, pp. 298-303, May 28-Jun. 3 1987, https://doi.10.1038/327298a0 [54] D. J. Jonker et al., “Cetuximab for the treatment of colorectal cancer,” (in eng), N Engl J Med, vol. 357, no. 20, pp. 2040-8, Nov. 2007, https://doi.10.1056/NEJMoa071834 [55] C. S. Karapetis et al., “K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer,” (in eng), N Engl J Med, vol. 359, no. 17, pp. 1757-65, Oct. 23 2008, https://doi.10.1056/NEJMoa0804385 [56] K. C. Wu et al., “Imaging prediction of KRAS mutation in patients with rectal cancer through deep metric learning using pretreatment [(18)F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography,” (in eng), Br J Radiol, vol. 96, no. 1151, p. 20230243, Nov 2023, https://doi.10.1259/bjr.20230243 [57] W. Wang et al., “Systematic and distributed time-of-flight list mode PET reconstruction,” in 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2006, vol. 3: IEEE, pp. 1715-1722. [58] L. He, Y. Chao, K. Suzuki, and K. Wu, “Fast connected-component labeling,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 1977-1987, Sep. 1 2009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2008.10.013 [59] X. Chen, W. Wang, Y. Jiang, and X. Qian, “A dual-transformation with contrastive learning framework for lymph node metastasis prediction in pancreatic cancer,” (in eng), Med Image Anal, vol. 85, p. 102753, Apr. 2023, https://doi.10.1016/j.media.2023.102753 [60] Y. Wen, I. Chremmos, Y. Chen, J. Zhu, Y. Zhang, and S. Yu, “Spiral transformation for high-resolution and efficient sorting of optical vortex modes,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 120, no. 19, p. 193904, 2018. [61] J.-B. Grill et al., “Bootstrap your own latent-a new approach to self-supervised learning,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 33, pp. 21271-21284, 2020. [62] Z. Liu et al., “Swin transformer v2: Scaling up capacity and resolution,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2022, pp. 12009-12019. [63] A. Dosovitskiy, “An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929, 2020. [64] D. P. Kingma, “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014. [65] A. Mahabub, “A robust technique of fake news detection using ensemble voting classifier and comparison with other classifiers,” SN Applied Sciences, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 525, Mar. 2020, https://doi.10.1007/s42452-020-2326-y. [66] A. Toosi, I. Shiri, H. Zaidi, and A. Rahmim, “Segmentation-Free outcome prediction from head and neck cancer PET/CT images: Deep learning-based feature extraction from Multi-Angle Maximum Intensity Projections (MA-MIPs),” Cancers, vol. 16, no. 14, p. 2538, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/16/14/2538. [67] E. Lombardo et al., “Distant metastasis time to event analysis with CNNs in independent head and neck cancer cohorts,” (in eng), Sci Rep, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 6418, Mar. 19 2021, https://doi.10.1038/s41598-021-85671-y [68] H. Tomita et al., “Deep learning approach of diffusion-weighted imaging as an outcome predictor in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer patients with radiotherapy-related curative treatment: a preliminary study,” European Radiology, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 5353-5361, 2022. [69] S. N. Yang et al., “Clinical implications of the tumor volume reduction rate in head-and-neck cancer during definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy for organ preservation,” (in eng), Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 1096-103, Mar. 15 2011, https://doi.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.12.055. [70] J. Giorgi, O. Nitski, B. Wang, and G. Bader, “Declutr: Deep contrastive learning for unsupervised textual representations,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.03659, 2020. [71] P. Bonomo et al., “Simulation CT-based radiomics for prediction of response after neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer,” (in eng), Radiat Oncol, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 84, Apr. 28 2022, https://doi.10.1186/s13014-022-02053-y [72] Z. Li, A. C. Raldow, J. B. Weidhaas, Q. Zhou, and X. S. Qi, “Prediction of radiation treatment response for locally advanced rectal cancer via a longitudinal trend analysis framework on Cone-Beam CT,” (in eng), Cancers (Basel), vol. 15, no. 21, Oct. 25 2023, https://doi.10.3390/cancers15215142 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/98350 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 頭頸鱗狀細胞癌(Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma, HNSCC)是一種全球常見且具有高度侵襲性之惡性腫瘤,其治療困難度高且預後不佳。研究顯示,淋巴結轉移(Lymph Node Metastasis, LNM)乃是影響患者存活率及預後的重要因素。當前臨床上對淋巴結轉移的評估主要仰賴影像診斷及病理檢查,然而這些傳統評估方法存在許多臨床挑戰,包括診斷準確性不足、診斷過程具侵入性且風險較高、易受醫師主觀判斷影響,以及病理取樣存在明顯的空間限制和誤差問題。因此,急需一種非侵入性且高精確度的輔助診斷工具,以協助醫師進行更精準的臨床診療決策。
隨著人工智慧(Artificial Intelligence, AI)尤其是深度學習(Deep Learning, DL)技術的迅速崛起與發展,DL在醫學影像分析領域逐漸展現其優越的性能及強大的潛力 。深度學習透過多層次抽象特徵提取,能有效地學習複雜影像資料的潛在病理特徵,並顯著提升影像診斷與預後預測的準確性。因此,本研究提出一套基於深度學習之非侵入性診斷與預後預測框架,旨在克服現行傳統診斷方法的諸多限制,實現頭頸癌患者淋巴結轉移與治療效果的精確評估。 本研究設計分為兩個重要實驗階段,分別針對不同的影像資料與臨床需求進行深入的探索與驗證。 實驗A以194名經診斷確認的頭頸癌患者為研究對象,透過融合18F-FDG PET/CT影像建立無需影像分割的深度學習模型,利用先進的自監督學習(Self-supervised Learning)架構,包括Bootstrap Your Own Latent (BYOL)、Swin Transformer V2 (SwinV2)及Vision Transformer (ViT)等模型,以提升資料利用率並避免傳統影像分割產生的誤差 。為進一步強化模型泛化能力,實驗A導入資料增強策略,包括Mercator投影與螺旋變換,擴充訓練樣本,提升模型的預測表現 。最後,透過集成投票分類器,成功整合不同深度學習模型的特性,達到模型性能的最佳化。 實驗B則聚焦於162名接受放射治療之患者,利用初始診斷前後與治療期間的自適應放射治療(Adaptive Radiation Therapy, ART)模擬CT影像,透過創新的深度對比學習(Deep Contrastive Learning, DCL)方法,顯著提升影像特徵的辨識能力。同時,為避免單一模型過擬合問題,本研究亦提出了多模型集成框架,有效整合不同深度學習模型的預測結果,大幅提高了模型在臨床應用中的穩定性與準確性。 研究結果證實,本研究所提出的兩套深度學習框架在頭頸癌患者的預後評估中,表現均優於傳統臨床評估參數。 在實驗A中,利用PET/CT影像的集成模型在預測局部復發、淋巴結復發及遠端轉移方面,其ROC曲線下面積(AUC)分別達到0.850、0.878與0.893。 在實驗B中,融合基線與治療中CT影像的集成模型在預測相同臨床目標時,AUC則分別為0.773、0.747與0.793。 這些結果顯示,本研究開發的模型能有效提升臨床診斷與預後決策的準確性,特別是在利用PET/CT影像預測遠端轉移方面展現了卓越的性能。 綜合而言,本研究所開發之深度學習診斷與預後系統能在治療初期即精確地識別出高風險病患,提供更為精細且個性化的治療策略建議,有效改善患者的治療成效與長期生存機會。此外,本研究成果不僅提供了一個非侵入性、高準確性、且具泛化能力的臨床輔助工具,未來更可透過多中心的臨床驗證與推廣,期望將其廣泛應用於頭頸癌治療的精準醫療策略中,促進整體醫療資源的有效配置,推動頭頸癌治療朝向更具個人化與精確化的方向邁進。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) is a globally prevalent malignancy known for its aggressive nature, treatment complexity, and poor prognosis. Among the critical factors affecting patient survival and prognosis, lymph node metastasis (LNM) has been recognized as a particularly significant determinant. Currently, clinical evaluation of lymph node metastasis primarily relies on imaging diagnostics and pathological examinations. However, these traditional methods present several clinical challenges, including insufficient accuracy, invasiveness, high procedural risk, susceptibility to subjective interpretation by clinicians, and inherent limitations due to sampling errors in biopsy. Consequently, there is an urgent need for non-invasive and highly accurate diagnostic tools to assist clinicians in making precise clinical decisions.
The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI), especially Deep Learning (DL) technologies, has introduced new possibilities in medical image analysis, demonstrating superior performance and considerable potential. Deep learning effectively extracts complex pathological features from medical images through multi-layer abstract feature extraction, significantly enhancing the accuracy of diagnostic assessments and prognostic predictions. Hence, this study proposes a non-invasive diagnostic and prognostic prediction framework based on deep learning, aiming to overcome existing limitations of conventional methods and accurately assess lymph node metastasis and treatment outcomes in HNSCC patients. This research is structured into two primary experimental phases, addressing diverse imaging datasets and clinical requirements comprehensively. Experiment A included 194 diagnosed HNSCC patients, utilizing a segmentation-free deep learning model developed through the fusion of 18F-FDG PET/CT images. Advanced self-supervised learning architectures, such as Bootstrap Your Own Latent (BYOL), Swin Transformer V2 (SwinV2), and Vision Transformer (ViT), were employed to enhance data utilization and circumvent segmentation-induced errors. To further augment model generalizability, Experiment A introduced sophisticated data augmentation techniques, including Mercator projection and spiral transformations, expanding training datasets and improving predictive performance. Ultimately, an ensemble voting classifier effectively integrated the unique strengths of various deep learning models, optimizing overall predictive performance. Experiment B focused on 162 patients undergoing radiation therapy, employing baseline diagnostic CT images and adaptive radiation therapy (ART) simulation CT scans. Through innovative Deep Contrastive Learning (DCL) methodologies, this experiment significantly enhanced the identification of critical image features. Additionally, to mitigate overfitting commonly observed in single-model architectures, a multi-model ensemble framework was introduced, substantially increasing model stability and predictive accuracy in clinical applications. The experimental results confirm that both deep learning frameworks proposed in this study significantly outperform traditional clinical assessment parameters in predicting outcomes for HNSCC patients. In Experiment A, the ensemble model utilizing baseline ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT images achieved an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.850, 0.878, and 0.893 for predicting local recurrence, nodal relapse, and distant metastasis, respectively. In Experiment B, the merged ensemble model fusing baseline and ART simulation CT scans yielded AUCs of 0.773, 0.747, and 0.793 for the same clinical endpoints, with corresponding accuracies of 72.4%, 74.7%, and 75.8%. These findings demonstrate that the developed models effectively enhance the precision of clinical diagnosis and prognostic decision-making, with the PET/CT-based approach showing exceptional performance in predicting distant metastasis. In conclusion, the comprehensive deep learning diagnostic and prognostic system developed herein allows for early and precise identification of high-risk patients, facilitating more refined and personalized treatment strategies and significantly improving patient treatment outcomes and long-term survival quality. This study not only provides a non-invasive, high-accuracy, and highly generalizable clinical decision-support tool but also lays the groundwork for future multicenter clinical validation and widespread implementation in precision medicine strategies for HNSCC. Ultimately, this innovation aims to optimize the allocation of medical resources and propel HNSCC treatment towards greater personalization and accuracy. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-08-04T16:07:36Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-08-04T16:07:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Acknowledgment i
摘要 ii Abstract v Table of Contents viii List of Figures xii List of Tables xiii Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Overview of HNSCC, Current Challenges, and Emerging Technologies in Treatment 1 1.2 Proposed Research Approach and Experimental Design Using Deep Learning 6 1.3 Experiment Process 8 1.3.1 Experiment A Process 8 1.3.2 Experiment B Process 9 Chapter 2 Literature Review 12 2.1 Overview of Head and Neck Cancer and the Challenge of Nodal Metastasis 12 2.2 Imaging Modalities for the Evaluation of Head and Neck Cancer 14 2.3 Deep Learning Applications for Outcome Prediction in Cancer 16 2.3.1 Current Status of Research on HNSCC Lymph Node Metastasis Prediction 16 2.3.2 Application of AI in Cervical Cancer Prognosis Prediction 18 2.3.3 Predicting Cervical Cancer Treatment Outcomes Based on DL 20 Chapter 3 Experiment A 22 3.1 Introduction 22 3.2 Materials and Methods 23 3.2.1 Study Population 23 3.2.2 Study Endpoints and Design 24 3.2.3 PET/CT Image Acquisition 27 3.2.4 Data Preprocessing 27 3.2.5 Data Augmentation 28 3.2.6 Mercator Projection and Spiral Transformation 28 3.2.7 Image Fusion 32 3.2.8 Model Training and Optimization 33 3.2.9 Post-Processing 34 3.2.10 Treatment 35 3.2.11 Follow-Up 35 3.2.12 Statistical Analysis 36 3.3 Results and Treatment Outcome 36 3.3.1 Study Population Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes 36 3.3.2 Patient-Based Prediction 42 3.3.3 Comparison with the Prediction Performance from the Clinical Stage and Classical 18F-PET Parameters 45 3.4 Discussion 46 3.5 Conclusion 49 Chapter 4 Experiment B 51 4.1 Introduction 51 4.2 Materials and Methods 52 4.2.1 Study Population 52 4.2.2 Study Endpoints and Design 53 4.2.3 Simulation CT Image Acquisition 55 4.2.4 Tumor Volume Delineation 55 4.2.5 Data Preprocessing 56 4.2.6 Data Augmentation 56 4.2.7 Data Split and Batch Balancing 57 4.2.8 Model Training and Optimization 57 4.2.9 Loss function 59 4.2.10 Postprocessing 62 4.2.11 Treatment 62 4.2.12 Follow-up 63 4.2.13 Statistical Analysis 63 4.3 Results 63 4.3.1 Patient Characteristics and Treatment Outcome 63 4.3.2 Patient-Based Prediction 67 4.3.3 Comparison with the Prediction Performance from Clinical Stage and gross Tumor Volumes 72 4.4 Discussion 72 4.5 Conclusion 75 Chapter 5 Conclusion 76 5.1 Summary of Research Contributions 76 5.2 Key Findings 76 5.2.1 Experiment A: Baseline 18F-FDG-PET/CT Imaging 76 5.2.2 Experiment B: Baseline and ART Simulation CT Scans 76 5.3 Limitations and Future Directions 77 5.4 Implications and Concluding Remarks 78 References 79 Appendix 90 Appendix 1. Data Augmentation (Ex A) 90 Appendix 2. (Ex A) 92 Appendix 3. (Ex B) 95 Appendix 4. Comparison with the prediction performance from clinical T- or N-stage and gross tumor volume. (Ex B) 96 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject | 頭頸癌 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 淋巴結轉移 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 深度學習 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | PET/CT | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 自適應放射治療 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 精準醫療 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 非侵入性診斷 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 資料增強 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 對比學習 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 多模型集成 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Non-invasive Diagnosis | en |
| dc.subject | Precision Medicine | en |
| dc.subject | Head and Neck Cancer | en |
| dc.subject | Lymph Node Metastasis | en |
| dc.subject | Deep Learning | en |
| dc.subject | PET/CT | en |
| dc.subject | Adaptive Radiation Therapy | en |
| dc.subject | Multi-model Ensemble | en |
| dc.subject | Contrastive Learning | en |
| dc.subject | Data Augmentation | en |
| dc.title | 深度學習用於頭頸癌淋巴結轉移的診斷與預後 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Deep Learning for Diagnosis and Prognosis of Lymph Node Metastasis in Head and Neck Cancer | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林風;傅楸善;羅崇銘;陳尚文 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Phone Lin;Chiou-Shann Fuh;Chung-Ming Lo;Shang-Wen Chen | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 頭頸癌,淋巴結轉移,深度學習,PET/CT,自適應放射治療,精準醫療,非侵入性診斷,資料增強,對比學習,多模型集成, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Head and Neck Cancer,Lymph Node Metastasis,Deep Learning,PET/CT,Adaptive Radiation Therapy,Precision Medicine,Non-invasive Diagnosis,Data Augmentation,Contrastive Learning,Multi-model Ensemble, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 99 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202502805 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-08-01 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 電機資訊學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生醫電子與資訊學研究所 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | N/A | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 生醫電子與資訊學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 3.47 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
