請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/98163完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳業寧 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Yehning Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 倪宇辰 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu-Chen Ni | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-30T16:10:14Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-07-31 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-07-30 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-07-11 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
一、國內文獻 CSRone永續智庫（2024）。2024 臺灣暨亞太永續報告現況與趨勢。CSRone。 TESG 永續發展指標技術手冊 (2023) 台灣經濟新報 金融監督管理委員會（2022）。發布有關《境外基金管理辦法》第12條第6項第9款及第39條第2項第14款規定之令（金管證投字第1100365536號）。 財團法人中華民國證券櫃檯買賣中心 (2023) 財團法人中華民國證券櫃檯買賣中心永續發展債券作業要點 綠色公民行動聯盟（2024）。打造反漂綠生態系：2024企業永續追蹤報告。https://gcaa.org.tw/10468/ 綠色金融行動方案 (2017) 金融監督管理委員會 綠色金融行動方案2.0 (2020) 金融監督管理委員會 綠色金融行動方案3.0 (2022) 金融監督管理委員會 發布環境、社會與治理（ESG）相關主題之境外基金資訊揭露事項審查監理原則(2022) 金融監督管理委員會 二、國外文獻 AA1000 ACCOUNTABILITY PRINCIPLES(2018) AccountAbility Abouarab, R., Mishra, T., & Wolfe, S. (2024). Spotting portfolio greenwashing in environmental funds. Journal of Business Ethics. Al Amosh, H., & Khatib, S. F. A. (2022). Ownership structure and environmental, social and governance performance disclosure: The moderating role of the board independence. Journal of Business and Socio-economic Development, 2(1), 49–66. Azar, J., Duro, M., Kadach, I., & Ormazabal, G. (2021). The Big Three and corporate carbon emissions around the world. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(3), 674–696. Babic, M. (2024). Green finance in the global energy transition: Actors, instruments, and politics. Energy Research & Social Science, 111, 103482. Barko, T., Cremers, M., & Renneboog, L. (2022). Shareholder engagement on environmental, social, and governance performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 173(4), 855-887. Bugg-Levine, A., & Emerson, J. (2011). Impact investing: Transforming how we make money while making a difference. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 6(3), 9–18. Caskey, J., & Chang, W.-H. (2022). Do ESG-linked loans enhance the credibility of ESG disclosures? SSRN Working Paper. Chen, Y. S., & Chang, C. H. (2013). Greenwash and green trust: The mediation effects of green consumer confusion and green perceived risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(3), 489-500. De Freitas Netto, S. V., Sobral, M. F. F., Ribeiro, A. R. B., & Soares, G. R. (2020). Concepts and forms of greenwashing: A systematic review. Environmental Sciences Europe, 32(1), 1-12. Delmas, M. A., & Burbano, V. C. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review, 54(1), 64-87. Dimson, E., Karakaş, O., & Li, X. (2015). Active ownership. The Review of Financial Studies, 28(12), 3225-3268. Duchin, R., Gao, J., & Xu, Q. (2024). Sustainability or greenwashing: Evidence from the asset market for industrial pollution. The Journal of Finance, 79(0). Dursun-de Neef, H. Ö., Ongena, S., & Tsonkova, G. (2023). Green versus sustainable loans: The impact on firms' ESG performance. Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper No. 22-42. Elkington, J. (1997) Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Capstone, Oxford. European Commission. (n.d.). Overview of sustainable finance. Retrieved May 18, 2025, from https://finance.ec.europa.eu/sustainable-finance/overview-sustainable-finance_en Free, C., Jones, S., & Tremblay, M.-S. (2024). Greenwashing and sustainability assurance: A review and call for future research. Journal of Accounting Literature. Fuadah, L. L., Mukhtaruddin, M., Andriana, I., & Arisman, A. (2022). The ownership structure, and the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure, firm value, and firm performance: The audit committee as a moderating variable. Economies, 10(12), 314. Garrido, D., Espínola‐Arredondo, A., & Munoz‐Garcia, F. (2020). Can mandatory certification promote greenwashing? A signaling approach. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 22(6), 1801–1851. Ghitti, M., Gianfrate, G., & Palma, L. (2024). The agency of greenwashing. Journal of Management and Governance, 28(905–941). Global Impact Investing Network (2025) Impact investing A guide to this dynamic market Global Reporting Initiative (2021) GRI 1: Foundation 2021 Gray, R., & Bebbington, J. (2000). Environmental Accounting, Managerialism and Sustainability: Is the Planet Safe in the Hands of Business and Accounting? Advances in Environmental Accounting & Management, 1, 1-44. Hu, X., Hua, R., Liu, Q., & Wang, C. (2023). The green fog: Environmental rating disagreement and corporate greenwashing. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 78, 101952. International Capital Market Association. (2021). Green Bond Principles: Voluntary process guidelines for issuing green bonds International Capital Market Association. (2023). Social Bond Principles Voluntary Process Guidelines for Issuing Social Bonds International Capital Market Association. (2024). Sustainability-Linked Bond Principles Voluntary Process Guidelines International Corporate Governance Network (2024) ICGN Global Stewardship Principles Kathan, M. C., Utz, S., Dorfleitner, G., Eckberg, J., & Chmel, L. (2025). What you see is not what you get: ESG scores and greenwashing risk. Finance Research Letters, 74, 106710. Kaustia, M., & Yu, W. (2021, September 30). Greenwashing in mutual funds [Working paper]. Aalto University School of Business, Department of Finance. Kim, S., Kumar, N., Lee, J., & Oh, J. (2023). ESG lending. Finance Working Paper No. 817/2022, European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI). Kleffel, P., & Muck, M. (2023). Aggregate confusion or inner conflict? An experimental analysis of investors’ reaction to greenwashing. Finance Research Letters, 53, 103421. Krueger, P., Sautner, Z., & Starks, L. T. (2020). The importance of climate risks for institutional investors. The Review of Financial Studies, 33(3), 1067-1111. Liu, G., Qian, H., Shi, Y., Yuan, D., & Zhou, M. (2024). How do firms react to capital market liberalization? Evidence from ESG reporting greenwashing. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(5), 4329–4344. Loan Market Association, Asia Pacific Loan Market Association, Loan Syndications and Trading Association (2024) Green Loan Principles Lopez-de-Silanes, F., McCahery, J. A., & Pudschedl, P. C. (2024). Institutional investors and ESG preferences. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 32(6), 1060–1086. Lyon, T. P., & Maxwell, J. W. (2011). Greenwash: Corporate environmental disclosure under threat of audit. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 20(1), 3-41. Ma, Y., Feng, G., Yin, Z., & Chang, C. P. (2024). ESG disclosures, green innovation, and greenwashing: All for sustainable development? Sustainable Development, 32(3), 1–19 Manetti, G., & Toccafondi, S. (2012). The role of stakeholders in sustainability reporting assurance. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(3), 363–377. Marimon, F., Alonso-Almeida, M. del M., Rodríguez, M. del P., & Cortez Alejandro, K. A. (2012). The worldwide diffusion of the Global Reporting Initiative: What is the point? Journal of Cleaner Production, 33, 132–144. Marquis, C., Toffel, M. W., & Zhou, Y. (2016). Scrutiny, norms, and selective disclosure: A global study of greenwashing. Organization Science, 27(2), 483-504. Materiality Map (2019) Sustainability Accounting Standards Board Møller-Pettersen, N.-L. (2020). Does ownership structure matter for ESG score? Master's Thesis, Copenhagen Business School. Motavalli, J. (2011). A history of greenwashing: How dirty towels impacted the green movement. Daily Finance. Retrieved from. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/2011-02-12-the-history-of-greenwashing-how-dirty-towels-impacted-the-green.html MSCI. (2024). MSCI Global Environment Indexes Methodology. New York: MSCI Inc. Newton, D. P., Ongena, S., Xie, R., & Zhao, B. (2023). Firm ESG reputation risk and debt choice Pope, S., & Wæraas, A. (2016). CSR-washing is rare: A conceptual framework, literature review, and critique. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(1), 173-193. Principles for Responsible Investment (2024) Principles for Responsible Investment Rompotis, G. G. (2023). Do ESG ETFs “greenwash”? Evidence from the US market. The Journal of Impact and ESG Investing, 3(4), 49–63. Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: Categories and interactions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(4), 222–237. Schoenmaker, D., & Schramade, W. (2019). Principles of Sustainable Finance. Oxford University Press. Shi, X., Ma, J., Jiang, A., Wei, S., & Yue, L. (2023). Green bonds: Green investments or greenwashing? International Review of Financial Analysis, 90, 102850. Szabo, S., & Webster, J. (2020). Perceived greenwashing: The effects of green marketing on environmental and product perceptions. Journal of Business Ethics, 171(4), 719-739. TerraChoice. (2010). The sins of greenwashing: Home and family edition. TerraChoice Group, Inc. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Villalonga, B., Tufano, P., & Wang, B. (2024). Corporate ownership and ESG performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 102732. Wedari, L. K., Jubb, C., & Moradi-Motlagh, A. (2021). Corporate climate-related voluntary disclosures: Does potential greenwash exist among Australian high emitters reports? Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 3721–3739. Wei, L., & Chengshu, W. (2023). Company ESG performance and institutional investor ownership preferences. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 33(3), 287–307. Xia, F., Chen, J., Yang, X., Li, X., & Zhang, B. (2023). Financial constraints and corporate greenwashing strategies in China. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(4), 1770–1781. Yu, E. P.-Y., Luu, B. V., & Chen, C. H. (2020). Greenwashing in environmental, social, and governance disclosures. Research in International Business and Finance, 52, 101192. Zahid, R. M. A., Maqsood, U. S., Irshad, S., & Khan, M. K. (2023). The role of women on board in combatting greenwashing: A new perspective on environmental performance. Business Ethics, Environment & Responsibility. Zhang, D. (2023). Does green finance really inhibit extreme hypocritical ESG risk? A greenwashing perspective exploration. Energy Economics, 121, 106688. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/98163 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究以我國2019年至2024年台灣上市櫃企業為研究對象，分析永續金融機制對企業永續漂洗行為的抑制效應，並進一步將永續金融商品細分為永續基金、債券與貸款以及金融機構持股，並將永續漂洗分為環境、社會與治理三大漂洗面向，詳細探討各類永續金融與永續漂洗不同面向之間的影響關係。
結果顯示永續金融對企業永續漂洗行為均未有顯著的影響。表明目前台灣市場中的永續資金尚未明確形成對企業永續漂洗行為抑制效應。這一結果可能反映了台灣永續金融市場仍處於發展初期，永續金融商品的規模相對有限，難以對企業永續行為形成有效約束。 本研究亦透過兩階段最小平方法進行穩健性測試，結果仍顯示永續金融無助於降低企業的永續漂洗行為。本研究針對永續報告書與永續漂洗之關係進行額外檢驗，發現確信有助於降低永續、社會與治理漂洗。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The thesis studies the inhibitory effect of sustainable finance mechanisms on corporate sustainable washing behaviors, with the data of Taiwanese listed firm from 2019 to 2024. The thesis then further categorized sustainable finance to sustainable fund, debt and loan, as well as stocks held by financial institutions. Whilst sustainable finance is divided into environment, social and governance washing. The research explores in detail the relationships between various types of sustainable finance and the different aspects of sustainability washing.
The result finds that sustainable finance do not exhibit significant impact on the various types of washing. The result may indicate that Taiwanese sustainable finance is still at its early stage of development and with limited capital inflow, making it difficult to effectively constrain corporate sustainability behaviors. The thesis further performs robustness tests with two-stage least squares, the results reveal that sustainable finance is incapable of inhibiting corporate sustainable washing. The thesis further examines the effect of sustainability report assurance on sustainable washing. The findings indicate that assurance significantly contributes to mitigating sustainable, social, and governance washing. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-07-30T16:10:14Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-07-30T16:10:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 I
摘要 II ABSTRACT III 目次 IV 圖次 VI 表次 VII 第一章、 緒論 1 第一節、 研究背景與動機 1 第二節、 研究目的 2 第二章、 文獻回顧 4 第一節、 永續金融制度之發展脈絡與其影響機制 4 第二節、 漂綠行為的理論基礎與衡量機制 12 第三節、 企業漂綠之影響因素彙整 16 第四節、 研究貢獻 24 第三章、 研究設計 26 第一節、 假說建立 26 第二節、 研究方法 27 第三節、 樣本選取與資料來源 34 第四章、 實證結果與分析 36 第一節、 樣本敘述 36 第二節、 相關係數 37 第三節、 實證結果分析 40 第五章、 結論與建議 54 第一節、 研究結論 54 第二節、 研究限制 55 第三節、 未來建議 56 參考文獻 59 附錄、GRI 對照 ESG揭露表 66 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 永續金融 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 永續漂洗 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 永續揭露 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 漂綠 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | ESG | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 確信 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Sustainable Report | en |
| dc.subject | Sustainable Finance | en |
| dc.subject | Assurance | en |
| dc.subject | ESG | en |
| dc.subject | Green Washing | en |
| dc.subject | Sustainable Washing | en |
| dc.title | 永續金融對永續漂洗行為抑制效應之探討 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Effect of Sustainable Finance on Sustainable Washing Deterrence | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 莊文議;蔡宜均 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Wen-I Chuang;Yi-Chun Tsai | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 永續金融,永續漂洗,永續揭露,漂綠,ESG,確信, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Sustainable Finance,Sustainable Washing,Sustainable Report,Green Washing,ESG,Assurance, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 78 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202501412 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-07-15 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 財務金融學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2029-10-09 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 財務金融學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.64 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。