請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/98158完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 黃恆獎 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Heng-Chiang Huang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 蔡宛辰 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Wan-Chen Cai | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-30T16:09:08Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-07-31 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-07-30 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-07-24 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | American Psychological Association (2018). Personal disposition. APA Dictionary of Psychology. https://dictionary.apa.org /personal-disposition.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6): 1173. Bar-On, R.(1988). The development ofan operational concept of psychological well-being. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Rhodes University). Bar-On, R. . (1997). Baron emotional quotient inventory: technical manual. Adults. Bar-On, R. (2006). The Bar-On model of emotional-social intelligence (ESI) 1. Psicothema, 13-25. Belk, R. W. (1985). Materialism: Trait aspects of living in the material world. Journal of Consumer research, 12(3), 265-280. Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (1995). Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. The quarterly journal of Economics, 110(1), 73-92. Brandon, J. E., Oescher, J., & Loftin, J. M. (1990). The Self-Control Questionnaire: An assessment. Health Values: Health Behavior, Education & Promotion. Chan, K., & Prendergast, G. (2007). Materialism and social comparison among adolescents. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 35(2), 213-228. Canfield, C. I., Fischhoff, B., & Davis, A. (2016). Quantifying phishing susceptibility for detection and behavior decisions. Human factors, 58(8), 1158-1172. Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). extend access to American Sociological Review. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588-608. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334. Curatola, G. . (2016). Optimal consumption and portfolio choice with loss aversion. SAFE Working Paper Series. Daun A. The materialistic life-style: some social-psychological aspects. 1983，25(4):6-16 DeLiema, M., Deevy, M., Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2020). Financial fraud among older Americans: Evidence and implications. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(4), 861-868. DeWall, C. N., Baumeister, R. F., Stillman, T. F., & Gailliot, M. T. (2007). Violence restrained: Effects of self-regulation and its depletion on aggression. Journal of Experimental social psychology, 43(1), 62-76. Duckworth, A. L. (2011). The significance of self-control. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(7), 2639-2640. Inseng Duh, H., Yu, H., & Ni, Y. (2021). Chinese Millenials' happiness and materialism: Explanations from two life‐course theories, self‐esteem, and money‐attitudes. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 55(4), 1306-1332. Dulewicz, V. , & Higgs, M. . (1999). Can emotional intelligence be measured and developed?. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 20(5), 242-253. Dvorak, R. D., & Simons, J. S. (2009). Moderation of resource depletion in the self-control strength model: Differing effects of two modes of self-control. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(5), 572-583. Gentina, E., Shrum, L. J., & Lowrey, T. M. (2018). Coping with loneliness through materialism: Strategies matter for adolescent development of unethical behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 152, 103-122. Fischer, P., Lea, S. E., & Evans, K. M. (2013). Why do individuals respond to fraudulent scam communications and lose money? The psychological determinants of scam compliance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(10), 2060-2072. Ger, G., & Belk, R. W. (1996). Cross-cultural differences in materialism. Journal of economic psychology, 17(1), 55-77. Goleman, & Daniel. (2000). Leadership that gets results. Harvard Business Review. Goldberg, M. E., Gorn, G. J., Peracchio, L. A., & Bamossy, G. (2003). Understanding materialism among youth. Journal of consumer psychology, 13(3), 278-288. Gomes, F. J. (2005). Portfolio choice and trading volume with loss‐averse investors. The Journal of Business, 78(2), 675-706. Gunarto, Hary (2019). Parametric & Nonparametric Data Analysis for Social Research: IBM SPSS. LAP Academic Publishing. ISBN 978-6200118721. Kaiser, H. F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23(3), 187-200. Inglehart, R. (1981). Post-materialism in an environment of insecurity. American political science review, 75(4), 880-900. James, B. D., Boyle, P. A., & Bennett, D. A. (2014). Correlates of susceptibility to scams in older adults without dementia. Journal of elder abuse & neglect, 26(2), 107-122. Tversky, K. A. . (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291. Kahn, I., Yeshurun, Y., Rotshtein, P., Fried, I., Ben-Bashat, D., & Hendler, T. (2002). The role of the amygdala in signaling prospective outcome of choice. Neuron, 33(6), 983-994. Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35(4), 401-415. Kaiser, H. F., & Rice, J. (1974). Little jiffy, mark IV. Educational and psychological measurement, 34(1), 111-117. Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1993). A dark side of the American dream: correlates of financial success as a central life aspiration. Journal of personality and social psychology, 65(2), 410. Koay, K. Y., Cheung, M. L., Soh, P. C. H., & Teoh, C. W. (2022). Social media influencer marketing: the moderating role of materialism. European Business Review, 34(2), 224-243. Kirshner, S. N., & Shao, L. (2018). Internal and external reference effects in a two-tier supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 267(3), 944-957. Law, K. S., Wong, C. S., & Song, L. J. (2004). The construct and criterion validity of emotional intelligence and its potential utility for management studies. Journal of applied Psychology, 89(3), 483. Lee, J., & Soberon‐Ferrer, H. (1997). Consumer vulnerability to fraud: Influencing factors. Journal of consumer affairs, 31(1), 70-89. Loewenstein, G. (1996). Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 65(3), 272-292. Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1995). Emotional intelligence and the construction and regulation of feelings. Applied and preventive psychology, 4(3), 197-208. Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1997). What is emotional intelligence? Emotional development and Books. Mayer, J. D. (2002). MSCEIT: Mayer-Salovey-Caruso emotional intelligence test. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems. Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., Caruso, D. R., & Sitarenios, G. (2003). Measuring emotional intelligence with the MSCEIT V2. 0. Emotion, 3(1), 97. Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. R. (2008). Emotional intelligence: New ability or eclectic traits?. American psychologist, 63(6), 503. Modic, D., & Lea, S. E. (2012). How neurotic are scam victims, really? The big five and Internet scams. The Big Five and Internet Scams (September 10, 2012). Opree, S. J., Buijzen, M., van Reijmersdal, E. A., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2011). Development and validation of the Material Values Scale for children (MVS-c). Personality and Individual Differences, 51(8), 963-968. Wakker, P. P. (2010). Prospect theory: For risk and ambiguity. Cambridge university press, 145-276. Polk, D. E., Cohen, S., Doyle, W. J., Skoner, D. P., & Kirschbaum, C. (2005). State and trait affect as predictors of salivary cortisol in healthy adults. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 30(3), 261-272. Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate behavioral research, 42(1), 185-227. Rassuli, K. M., & Hollander, S. C. (1986). Desire-induced, innate, insatiable?. Journal of Macromarketing, 6(2), 4-24. Richins, M. L., & Dawson, S. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. Journal of consumer research, 19(3), 303-316. Richins, M. L. (2004). The material values scale: Measurement properties and development of a short form. Journal of consumer Research, 31(1), 209-219. Rosenbaum, M. (1980). A schedule for assessing self-control behaviors: Preliminary findings. Behavior therapy, 11(1), 109-121. Ross, M., Grossmann, I., & Schryer, E. (2014). Contrary to psychological and popular opinion, there is no compelling evidence that older adults are disproportionately victimized by consumer fraud. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(4), 427-442. Schachter, J. (1996, September/October). Enforcement and education impact consumer fraud. Credit World, pp. 30– 32. Schoepfer, A., & Piquero, N. L. (2009). Studying the correlates of fraud victimization and reporting. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(2), 209-215. Sirgy, M. J., Gurel-Atay, E., Webb, D., Cicic, M., Husic, M., Ekici, A., ... & Johar, J. S. (2012). Linking advertising, materialism, and life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 107, 79-101. Stewart, S. L., Wright, C., & Atherton, C. (2019). Deception detection and truth detection are dependent on different cognitive and emotional traits: An investigation of emotional intelligence, theory of mind, and attention. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(5), 794-807. Yoon, S., & Kim, H. C. (2016). Keeping the American dream alive: The interactive effect of perceived economic mobility and materialism on impulsive spending. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(5), 759-772. Tade, O., & Aliyu, I. (2011). Social organization of Internet fraud among university undergraduates in Nigeria. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 5(2) , 860. Tangney, J. P., Boone, A. L., & Baumeister, R. F. (2018). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. In Self-regulation and self-control (pp. 173-212). Routledge. Schweitzer, M. E., & Cachon, G. P. (2000). Decision bias in the newsvendor problem with a known demand distribution: Experimental evidence. Management science, 46(3), 404-420. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. science, 211(4481), 453-458. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and uncertainty, 5, 297-323. Warren, G., Schertler, E., & Bull, P. (2009). Detecting deception from emotional and unemotional cues. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 33, 59-69. Whitty, M. T. (2015). Mass-marketing fraud: a growing concern. IEEE Security & Privacy, 13(4), 84-87. Whiteside, S. P., Lynam, D. R., Miller, J. D., & Reynolds, S. K. (2005). Validation of the UPPS impulsive behaviour scale: a four‐factor model of impulsivity. European Journal of personality, 19(7), 559-574. Wojciechowski, J., Stolarski, M., & Matthews, G. (2014). Emotional intelligence and mismatching expressive and verbal messages: A contribution to detection of deception. PloS one, 9(3), e92570. Yan, N., He, X., & Liu, Y. (2019). Financing the capital-constrained supply chain with loss aversion: Supplier finance vs. supplier investment. Omega, 88, 162-178. Zhao, X., Lynch Jr, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of consumer research, 37(2), 197-206. 鄭曉瑩, 阮晨晗, & 彭泗清. (2017). 物質主義作為自我建構的工具:功能主義的研究視角. 心理研究, 10(1), 7. 段賀兵. (2019). 投資和博彩：民眾的樸素理論與損失厭惡.(碩士學位論文, 華東師範大學). 古典, 王卓, & 蔣獎. (2016). 物質主義與禮品類型偏好的關係:社會比較的仲介作用. 中國臨床心理學雜誌, 24(3), 4. 李靜, & 郭永玉. (2009). 物質主義價值觀量表在大學生群體中的修訂. 心理與行為研究, 7(4), 280-283. 李靜, 楊蕊蕊, & 郭永玉. (2017). 物質主義都是有害的嗎?——來自實證和概念的挑戰. 心理科學進展, 25(10), 10. 李舒彤. (2021). 基於問卷和文本分析的易受騙人群心理特徵及預測模型:認知特點,人格與金錢動機的作用. (碩士學位論文, 浙江大學). 李益軍, & 邱明月. (2020). 大學生網路詐騙案件的相關特徵分析. 法制博覽(27). 任宇波, & 羅永此. (2022). 電信網絡詐騙受騙易受騙性問卷編制及其信效度檢驗. 中國人民公安大學學報:自然科學版, 28(3), 32-37. 孫杉. (2017).基於損失厭惡和損失概率厭惡的績效薪酬模型研究. (碩士學位論文, 青島大學). 譚樹華, & 郭永玉. (2008). 大學生自我控制量表的修訂. 中國臨床心理學雜誌, 16(5), 3. 王才康. (2002). 少年犯情緒智力及共與有關個性因素的相關研究. 中國心理衛生雜誌, 016(008), 566-567,565. 張瑞雪, & 肖蓉. (2019). 物質主義傾向量表的編制及其信效度. 中國臨床心理學雜誌, 27(4), 5. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/98158 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 詐騙在全球範圍發生的愈發頻繁，詐騙案件也在逐年增加。在詐騙案件中，18-27嵗的年輕受害者近半數，是最大受害年齡群。與其他群體相比，大學生不但使用網絡更爲頻繁，而且接觸社會環境相對較爲單純，對於事務判斷缺乏經驗，思考方式更傾向於非理性。因此，大學生群體更容易成為網路詐騙的受害者。除了詐騙訊息的多樣化與迷惑性之外，個體心裡特質對於不同欺詐情境下的反應也是影響易受騙性的主要因素。因此，本研究以網絡詐騙最大的受害者群體（大學生）為研究對象，從大學生個體特質入手，探討物質主義、損失厭惡對大學生易受騙性的影響，探討自我控制在物質主義、損失厭惡與大學生易受騙性之間關係的中介作用，以及情緒智力在物質主義、損失厭惡與大學生易受騙性之間關係的調節作用。本研究採用了《電信網絡詐騙易受騙性量表》、《大學生物質主義價值觀量表》、《大學生自我控制量表》、《情緒智力量表》，制定了《損失厭惡量表》，共回收有效問卷共124份。本研究使用SPSS27.0對數據進行分析。研究結果顯示：（1）大學生物質主義與易受騙性呈正向顯著關係；（2）大學生損失厭惡與易受騙性正向顯著係；（3）自我控制在物質主義、損失厭惡和易受騙性的關係中起到了部分中介作用；（4）情緒智力在物質主義、損失厭惡和易受騙性之間起調節作用，即情緒智力越高，物質主義、損失厭惡對易受騙性的影響降低。最後，在本研究結論中，我們提出了管理意涵及未來研究的建議。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The fraud is more and more frequent worldwide, and the fraud cases are also increasing year by year. In fraud cases, the largest group of victims, aged 18-27, is nearly half of the victims. Compared with other groups, college students use the internet more frequently, expose to social environments more simply, judge affairs with less experience, and think with less rational way. Therefore, college students are more likely to become victims of Internet fraud. In addition to the diversity and confusion of fraudulent information, the individual psychological traits are also the main factors, affecting the vulnerability to fraud in different fraudulent situations. Therefore, in this study, the individual characteristics of college students, who are the largest victim group of online fraud, are studied to investigate the influence of materialism and loss aversion on the college students’ vulnerability to fraud, to investigate the mediating role of self-control in the relationship between materialism, loss aversion, and the college students' vulnerability to fraud, and to investigate the adjustment role of emotional intelligence in the relationship between materialism, loss aversion, and college students' vulnerability to fraud. In this study, "the Telecom-fraud Susceptibility Questionnaire", "College Student Materialist Values Scale", "College Student Self Control Scale", and "Emotional Intelligence Scale" are used, and "Loss Aversion Scale" is proposed. A total of 124 valid questionnaires were collected, and the data is analyzed by SPSS 27.0. The research results show that: (1) There is a significant positive relationship between materialism and college students' vulnerability to fraud; (2) There is a significant positive correlation between loss aversion and college students' vulnerability to fraud; (3) Self control plays a partial mediating role in the relationship between materialism, loss aversion, and college students' vulnerability to fraud. (4) Emotional intelligence adjusts the relationship between materialism, loss aversion, and college students' vulnerability to fraud. That is, the higher the emotional intelligence, the lower the impact of materialism and loss aversion on the college students' vulnerability to fraud. Finally, in the conclusion section, management implications and recommendations for future research are proposed. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-07-30T16:09:08Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-07-30T16:09:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 致 謝 I
摘 要 II Abstract III 目 次 IV 圖 次 VI 表 次 VII 第一章 緒論 1 1.1. 研究背景與動機 1 1.2. 研究目的與研究問題 2 1.3. 研究流程 4 第二章 文獻探討 5 2.1. 易受騙性（Vulnerability to fraud） 5 2.2. 物質主義（Materialism） 5 2.3. 損失厭惡（Loss aversion） 7 2.4. 自我控制（Self-control） 10 2.5. 情緒智力（Emotional intelligence） 11 第三章 研究架構 13 3.1. 研究架構 13 3.2. 研究假說 13 3.3. 問巻設計 17 3.3.1. 易受騙性問卷 17 3.3.2. 物質主義問卷 18 3.3.3. 損失厭惡問卷 19 3.3.4. 自我控制問卷 21 3.3.5. 情緒智力問卷 22 3.4. 分析工具 24 第四章 研究結果 25 4.1. 敘述性統計分析 25 4.2. 信效度分析 28 4.3. 相關係數分析 35 4.4. 假說檢定 35 4.4.1. 物質主義對易受騙性影響 35 4.4.2. 損失厭惡對易受騙性影響 36 4.4.3. 自我控制具有中介物質主義與易受騙性之影響 36 4.4.4. 自我控制具有中介損失厭惡與易受騙性之影響 37 4.4.5. 情緒智力在物質主義和易受騙性中間具有調節作用。 38 4.4.6. 情緒智力在損失厭惡和易受騙性中間具有調節作用。 40 4.5. 研究結果 41 第五章 結論與建議 43 5.1. 研究結論與發現 43 5.2. 應用意涵 45 5.3. 研究限制 46 5.4. 未來研究建議 46 參考文獻 47 附錄一 54 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 易受騙性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 物質主義 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 損失厭惡 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 自我控制 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 情緒智力 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Loss aversion | en |
| dc.subject | Vulnerability to fraud | en |
| dc.subject | Emotional intelligence | en |
| dc.subject | Self control | en |
| dc.subject | Materialism | en |
| dc.title | 物質主義與損失厭惡對大學生易受騙性影響之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A Study on The Impact of Materialism And Loss Aversion on College Students' Vulnerability to Fraud | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 王仕茹;潘令妍 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Shih-Ju Wang;Ling-Yen Pan | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 易受騙性,物質主義,損失厭惡,自我控制,情緒智力, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Vulnerability to fraud,Materialism,Loss aversion,Self control,Emotional intelligence, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 59 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202502157 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-07-28 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | N/A | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 國際企業學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 4.76 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。