請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/98115完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 戚樹誠 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Shu-Cheng Chi | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 徐志雄 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Chih-Hsiung Hsu | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-29T16:06:02Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-07-30 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-07-28 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-07-10 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Ahmed, F., Xiong, Z., Faraz, N. A., & Arslan, A. (2023). The interplay between servant leadership, psychological safety, trust in a leader and burnout: Assessing causal relationships through a three-wave longitudinal study. International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics, 29(2), 912-924.
Arain, G. A., Hameed, I., & Crawshaw, J. R. (2019). Servant leadership and follower voice: the roles of follower felt responsibility for constructive change and avoidance-approach motivation. European journal of work and organizational psychology, 28(4), 555-565. Arnold, H. J. (1982). Moderator variables: A clarification of conceptual, analytic, and psychometric issues. Organizational behavior and human performance, 29(2), 143-174. Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34(3), 325-374. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of management review, 14(1), 20-39. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986(23-28), 2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Macmillan. Beck, C. D. (2014). Antecedents of servant leadership: A mixed methods study. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 21(3), 299-314. Berger, T. A. (2014). Servant leadership 2.0: A call for strong theory. Sociological Viewpoints, 30(1), 146. Bose, S., Patnaik, B., & Mohanty, S. (2021). The mediating role of psychological empowerment in the relationship between transformational leadership and organizational identification of employees. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 57(4), 490-510. Brown, D., & McCormack, B. (2005). Developing postoperative pain management: utilising the promoting action on research implementation in health services (PARIHS) framework. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 2(3), 131-141. Busch, T., Fallan, L., & Pettersen, A. (1998). Disciplinary differences in job satisfaction, self‐efficacy, goal commitment and organisational commitment among faculty employees in norwegian colleges: An empirical assessment of indicators of performance. Quality in Higher Education, 4(2), 137-157. Caesens, G., & Stinglhamber, F. (2014). The relationship between perceived organizational support and work engagement: The role of self-efficacy and its outcomes. European Review of Applied Psychology, 64(5), 259-267. Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational research methods, 4(1), 62-83. Cherian, J., & Jacob, J. (2013). Impact of self efficacy on motivation and performance of employees. International journal of business and management, 8(14), 80. Coetzer, M. F., Bussin, M., & Geldenhuys, M. (2017). The functions of a servant leader. Administrative Sciences, 7(1), 5. Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of personality and social psychology, 44(1), 113. Davis, M. H., Soderlund, T., Cole, J., Gadol, E., Kute, M., Myers, M., & Weihing, J. (2004). Cognitions associated with attempts to empathize: How do we imagine the perspective of another? Personality and social psychology bulletin, 30(12), 1625-1635. Dennis, R. S., & Bocarnea, M. (2005). Development of the servant leadership assessment instrument. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 26(8), 600-615. Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management journal, 50(4), 869-884. Donohoo, J. (2016). Collective efficacy: How educators' beliefs impact student learning. Corwin Press. Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative science quarterly, 239-263. Dyne, L. V., Ang, S., & Botero, I. C. (2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of management studies, 40(6), 1359-1392. Edmondson, A. C. (2003). Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. Journal of management studies, 40(6), 1419-1452. Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: a general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological methods, 12(1), 1. Ehrhart, M. G. (2004). Leadership and procedural justice climate as antecedents of unit‐level organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel psychology, 57(1), 61-94. Eriş, A., & Kökalan, Ö. (2022). The moderating effect of organizational identification on the relationship between organizational role stress and job satisfaction. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 892983. Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., Van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R. C. (2019). Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. The leadership quarterly, 30(1), 111-132. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50. Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American psychologist, 56(3), 218. Fuller, J. B., Hester, K., Barnett, T., Frey, L., Relyea, C., & Beu, D. (2006). Perceived external prestige and internal respect: New insights into the organizational identification process. Human relations, 59(6), 815-846. Galinsky, A. D., Gilin, D., & Maddux, W. W. (2011). Using both your head and your heart: The role of perspective taking and empathy in resolving social conflict (Vol. 13). Psychology Press New York. Galinsky, A. D., Maddux, W. W., Gilin, D., & White, J. B. (2008). Why it pays to get inside the head of your opponent: The differential effects of perspective taking and empathy in negotiations. Psychological science, 19(4), 378-384. Galinsky, A. D., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Perspective-taking: decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of personality and social psychology, 78(4), 708. Gashi Tresi, D., & Mihelič, K. K. (2018). The roles of self-efficacy and leader–member exchange in the relationship between job crafting and work–self facilitation: A moderated mediation model. Personnel Review, 47(7), 1362-1384. Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of management review, 17(2), 183-211. Glauser, M. J. (1984). Upward information flow in organizations: Review and conceptual analysis. Human relations, 37(8), 613-643. Grant, A. M., & Berry, J. W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management journal, 54(1), 73-96. Greenleaf, R. K. (1970). The servant as leader. Robert K. Greenleaf Publishing Center. Greenleaf, R. K. (1977/2002). Servant leadership. A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Paulist Press. Greenleaf, R. K. (2005). Greenleaf on Servant-Leadership: Who Is the Servant-Leader? International Journal of Servant-Leadership, 1(1). Hackett, R. D., & Wang, G. (2012). Virtues and leadership: An integrating conceptual framework founded in Aristotelian and Confucian perspectives on virtues. Management Decision, 50(5), 868-899. Hale, J. R., & Fields, D. L. (2007). Exploring servant leadership across cultures: A study of followers in Ghana and the USA. Leadership, 3(4), 397-417. Hamilton, F., & Bean, C. J. (2005). The importance of context, beliefs and values in leadership development. Business ethics: A European review, 14(4), 336-347. Han, Y., Kakabadse, N. K., & Kakabadse, A. (2010). Servant leadership in the People's Republic of China: A case study of the public sector. Journal of Management Development, 29(3), 265-281. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press. Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states (Vol. 25). Harvard university press. Hoever, I. J., Van Knippenberg, D., Van Ginkel, W. P., & Barkema, H. G. (2012). Fostering team creativity: perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity's potential. Journal of applied psychology, 97(5), 982. Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. I. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of management review, 25(1), 121-140. Hunter, E. M., Neubert, M. J., Perry, S. J., Witt, L., Penney, L. M., & Weinberger, E. (2013). Servant leaders inspire servant followers: Antecedents and outcomes for employees and the organization. The leadership quarterly, 24(2), 316-331. Isaacs, S. (1934). [The Moral Judgment of the Child., Jean Piaget]. Mind, 43(169), 85-99. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2250175 Jiang, X., & Wei, Y. (2024). Linking servant leadership to followers' thriving at work: self-determination theory perspective. Frontiers in psychology, 15, 1384110. Judge, T. A., Erez, A., & Bono, J. E. (1998). The power of being positive: The relation between positive self-concept and job performance. Human performance, 11(2-3), 167-187. Jun, K., Lee, J., & Lee, J. (2024). Unraveling the dynamics of employee retention in Asian organizations: exploring the interplay of organizational identification, affective commitment, and trust in leadership. Asian Business & Management, 23(3), 484-510. Keskes, I., Sallan, J. M., Simo, P., & Fernandez, V. (2018). Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: Mediating role of leader-member exchange. Journal of Management Development, 37(3), 271-284. Kohlberg, L. (1973). Collected papers on moral development and moral education. Lee, A., Lyubovnikova, J., Tian, A. W., & Knight, C. (2020). Servant leadership: A meta‐analytic examination of incremental contribution, moderation, and mediation. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 93(1), 1-44. Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2008). Social cognitive career theory and subjective well-being in the context of work. Journal of career assessment, 16(1), 6-21. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of vocational behavior, 45(1), 79-122. LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of applied psychology, 83(6), 853. LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (2001). Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: evidence of differential relationships with big five personality characteristics and cognitive ability. Journal of applied psychology, 86(2), 326. Li, J., & Xu, S. (2020). Extraversion, neuroticism, and employee voice: A conservation of resources perspective. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 1281. Liang, J., Farh, C. I., & Farh, J.-L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of Management journal, 55(1), 71-92. Liao, C., Liden, R. C., Liu, Y., & Wu, J. (2021). Blessing or curse: The moderating role of political skill in the relationship between servant leadership, voice, and voice endorsement. Journal of organizational Behavior, 42(8), 987-1004. Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Meuser, J. D., Hu, J., Wu, J., & Liao, C. (2015). Servant leadership: Validation of a short form of the SL-28. The leadership quarterly, 26(2), 254-269. Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Zhao, H., & Henderson, D. (2008). Servant leadership: Development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. The leadership quarterly, 19(2), 161-177. Liu, W., Zhu, R., & Yang, Y. (2010). I warn you because I like you: Voice behavior, employee identifications, and transformational leadership. The leadership quarterly, 21(1), 189-202. Lowder, B. T. (2009). The best leadership model for organizational change management: Transformational verses servant leadership. Available at SSRN 1418796. Luszczynska, A., Scholz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). The general self-efficacy scale: multicultural validation studies. The Journal of psychology, 139(5), 439-457. Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103-123. Mattila, A. S., & Hanks, L. (2012). Antecedents to participation in corporate social responsibility programs. Journal of Service Management, 23(5), 664-676. Meuser, J. D., & Smallfield, J. (2023). Servant leadership: The missing community component. Business Horizons, 66(2), 251-264. Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. Academy of Management annals, 5(1), 373-412. Morrison, E. W. (2014). Employee voice and silence. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., 1(1), 173-197. Morrison, E. W., & Milliken, F. J. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of management review, 25(4), 706-725. Morrison, E. W., Wheeler-Smith, S. L., & Kamdar, D. (2011). Speaking up in groups: a cross-level study of group voice climate and voice. Journal of applied psychology, 96(1), 183. Morse, R. S., & Buss, T. F. (2014). The transformation of public leadership. In Transforming public leadership for the 21st century (pp. 3-20). Routledge. Mowbray, P. K., Wilkinson, A., & Tse, H. H. (2015). An integrative review of employee voice: Identifying a common conceptualization and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17(3), 382-400. Omanwar, S. P., & Agrawal, R. K. (2022). Servant leadership, organizational identification and turnover intention: an empirical study in hospitals. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 30(2), 239-258. Parker, S. K., Atkins, P. W., & Axtell, C. M. (2008). Building better workplaces through individual perspective taking: A fresh look at a fundamental human process. International review of industrial and organizational psychology 2008, 23, 149-196. Parris, D. L., & Peachey, J. W. (2013). A systematic literature review of servant leadership theory in organizational contexts. Journal of business ethics, 113, 377-393. Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. Harcourt, Brace. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of educational psychology, 82(1), 33. Qiu, S., Dooley, L. M., & Xie, L. (2020). How servant leadership and self-efficacy interact to affect service quality in the hospitality industry: A polynomial regression with response surface analysis. Tourism Management, 78, 104051. Ruan, R., & Chen, W. (2021). Relationship between organizational identification and employee voice: A meta-analysis. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 49(10), 1-12. Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S. S., & Peng, A. C. (2011). Cognition-based and affect-based trust as mediators of leader behavior influences on team performance. Journal of applied psychology, 96(4), 863. Sherer, M., Maddux, J. E., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R. W. (1982). The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation. Psychological reports, 51(2), 663-671. Singh, R. K., & Chaudhary, P. (2022). The moderating role of culture in self-efficacy and approach to learning of students. On the Horizon: The International Journal of Learning Futures, 30(3), 153-162. Skorinko, J. L., & Sinclair, S. A. (2013). Perspective taking can increase stereotyping: The role of apparent stereotype confirmation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(1), 10-18. Song, Y., Tian, Q.-t., & Kwan, H. K. (2022). Servant leadership and employee voice: a moderated mediation. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 37(1), 1-14. Spears, L. C. (2010). Character and servant leadership: Ten characteristics of effective, caring leaders. The journal of virtues & leadership, 1(1), 25-30. Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 124(2), 240. Tajfel, H. (1978). The achievement of inter-group differentiation. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups (pp. 77–100). Academic Press. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of inter-group conflict. In W. G. Austin, & Worchel, S. (Ed.), The social psychology of inter-group relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole. Tangirala, S., & Ramanujam, R. (2008). Exploring nonlinearity in employee voice: The effects of personal control and organizational identification. Academy of Management journal, 51(6), 1189-1203. Tian, Q., Hu, Y., & Cheng, K. (2018). Servant leadership and voice behavior: organizational identification as a mediator. 2018 International Conference on Information Technology and Management Engineering (ICITME 2018), Tsai, M.-T., Tsai, C.-L., & Wang, Y.-C. (2011). A study on the relationship between leadership style, emotional intelligence, self-efficacy and organizational commitment: A case study of the Banking Industry in Taiwan. African Journal of Business Management, 5(13), 5319. Van Dick, R., Grojean, M. W., Christ, O., & Wieseke, J. (2006). Identity and the extra mile: Relationships between organizational identification and organizational citizenship behaviour. British Journal of Management, 17(4). Van Dick, R., & Wagner, U. (2002). Social identification among school teachers: Dimensions, foci, and correlates. European journal of work and organizational psychology, 11(2), 129-149. Van Dick, R., Wagner, U., Stellmacher, J., & Christ, O. (2004). The utility of a broader conceptualization of organizational identification: Which aspects really matter? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(2), 171-191. Van Dierendonck, D. (2011). Servant leadership: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1228-1261. Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management journal, 41(1), 108-119. Walumbwa, F. O., Hartnell, C. A., & Oke, A. (2010). Servant leadership, procedural justice climate, service climate, employee attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: a cross-level investigation. Journal of applied psychology, 95(3), 517. Walumbwa, F. O., & Schaubroeck, J. (2009). Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior: mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological safety. Journal of applied psychology, 94(5), 1275. Webb, T. L., Sheeran, P., & Luszczynska, A. (2009). Planning to break unwanted habits: Habit strength moderates implementation intention effects on behaviour change. British journal of social psychology, 48(3), 507-523. Wilde, N., & Hsu, A. (2019). The influence of general self-efficacy on the interpretation of vicarious experience information within online learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1-20. Williams, S., & Jones, F. (2009). Transformational leadership and servant leadership: Is there a difference. 21st Century Theories of Education Administration, 31. Xu, H., Zhong, M., & Liden, R. (2020). The state of the art in academic servant leadership research: A systematic review. Inspiration for servant-leaders: Lessons from fifty years of research and practice, 46-102. Xu, Z., Gu, Y., Wang, H., & Liu, L. (2024). Servant leadership and employee voice behavior: the role of employee work reflection and employee proactive personality. Frontiers in psychology, 15, 1421412. Yang, J., Liu, H., & Gu, J. (2017). A multi-level study of servant leadership on creativity: The roles of self-efficacy and power distance. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 38(5), 610-629. YUNYUE, Y. (2021). Understanding the antecedents of employee voice: a review of the literature. 日本労務学会誌, 21(2), 58-86. Zorlu, Ö., Avan, A., & Baytok, A. (2019). The effect of servant leadership on psychological empowerment and organizational identification. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11(1), 293-309. 王昱翔. (2023). 矛盾領導行為對創新行為的影響：以觀點採取 與創新角色認同為序列中介變項，複雜整合力 為調節變項 國立中央大學]. 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. 桃園縣. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/uzzqc7 王豫萱, & 胡昌亞. (2013). 再探組織認同之本質: 2002-2012 之研究回顧與前瞻. 人力資源管理學報, 13(4), 107-137. 李宗穎. (2023). 僕人式領導與部屬敬業度關聯性之研究—探討自我效能與成長/固定心態的調節效果 國立中央大學]. 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. 桃園縣. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/d6xk45 李柔樺. (2018). 核心自我評價特質與建言行為之關係： 探討情感性組織承諾與僕人領導扮演的角色 銘傳大學]. 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. 台北市. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/zybw5q 李濠仲. (2016). 領導與部屬交換關係、組織自尊與組織認同對員工當責之影響—組織自尊與組織認同中介作用之探討 國立中央大學]. 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. 桃園縣. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/6xqvhn 翁開誠. (1986). 同理心: 多向度測量與相關研究. 大洋出版. 張菱珊. (2022). 僕人領導對組織公民行為之影響: 以員工感恩為中介效果 長榮大學]. 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. 台南市. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/4rz2g9 彭泊. (2024). 物業管理一線主管工作壓力對離職傾向之影響:僕人式領導與核心自我評價的緩衝效果 致理科技大學]. 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. 新北市. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/sd5gmh 劉鴻毅. (2021). 個性還是互惠？ 人格特質與知覺組織支持對於僕人領導之影響 國立中興大學]. 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. 台中市. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/x7343f | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/98115 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究探討僕人領導對員工建言行為之影響，並檢驗組織認同的中介角色，以及觀點取替與一般自我效能可能的調節作用。本研究採問卷調查法驗證所提假說，資料蒐集分為兩波，第1波採用便利抽樣法，透過網路獲得問卷數為354份，第2波問卷調查乃於台灣北部某區域醫院透過院內信箱及通訊軟體平台發放，回收問卷數為95份。兩波總共回收問卷數為449份。
就量表之信效度而言，除了觀點取替之AVE值未達可接受標準外，其餘研究變項均滿足信效度標準，因此未進行觀點取替之假說檢定。迴歸分析結果顯示，僕人領導對員工建言行為具有顯著正向影響，亦即當員工感受到領導者展現服務與支持特質時，其提出建言的意願將隨之提升。其次，以拔靴法進行中介模型分析，顯示組織認同在僕人領導與建言行為之間發揮部分中介效果，說明僕人領導能夠強化員工對組織的歸屬感與認同，進而激發其主動建言行為。再其次，研究者使用SPSS 軟體套件PROCESS macro中的Model 7進行調節模型之檢驗，結果顯示一般自我效能對僕人領導與組織認同之關係具有正向調節作用，並且顯示調節中介模型亦為成立。即具高一般自我效能的員工，能更強烈感受到僕人領導帶來的組織認同感，而組織認同將更進行促使其採取建言行為。 根據本研究結果，建議企業管理者應強化僕人領導風格，透過服務與支持態度增進員工的組織認同；同時應提升員工一般自我效能，以最大化僕人領導的影響與建言行為的展現，進而提升組織整體的創新與改善能力。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study examines the effect of servant leadership on employees’ voice behavior, and the mediating role of organizational identification as well as the moderating effect of the above mediating effects by general self-efficacy and perspective taking. This study adopts questionnaire survey method to test the proposed hypotheses. There are two waves of data collections. The first wave utilized the convenient sampling technique, receiving 354 responses via internet; the second wave was through the intranet platform of a regional hospital in northern Taiwan, receiving 95 responses. The total number of questionnaire received were 449.
Regarding the reliability and validity of the survey scales, except for the AVE score of the perspective taking scale, all other scales met the acceptable criteria. Thus, perspective taking was not included in the hypothesis testing. The regression results showed that servant leadership had a significant positive impact on employees’ voice behavior — that is, when employees perceive their leaders as demonstrating service and support characteristics, they are more willing to speak up and offer suggestions. In addition, the bootstrapping method was used to test the mediating hypothesis, and the results showed that organizational identification played a partial mediating role between servant leadership and voice behavior, indicating that servant leadership can strengthen employees’ sense of belonging and identification with the organization, thereby stimulating proactive voice behavior. Moreover, Model 7 of PROCESS macro of SPSS software was employed to test the moderating hypotheses. The results showed that general self-efficacy positively moderated the relationship between servant leadership and organizational identification, and the proposed moderated-mediation hypothesis was also supported. In other words, employees with higher levels of general self-efficacy experience a stronger sense of organizational identification derived from servant leadership, which in turn more effectively drives them to engage in voice behavior. Based on these findings, it is recommended that corporate managers should strengthen servant leadership practices, using service and supportive attitudes to enhance employees’ organizational identification. At the same time, they are suggested to improve employees’ general self-efficacy in order to maximize the influence of servant leadership on employee voice behavior, leading to an increase of overall innovation and improvement capacity of organizations. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-07-29T16:06:02Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-07-29T16:06:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 I
致謝 II 中文摘要 III ABSTRACT IV 目次 VI 圖次 VIII 表次 IX 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 4 第二章 文獻探討 5 第一節 僕人領導 5 第二節 組織認同 8 第三節 一般自我效能 11 第四節 觀點取替 14 第五節 建言行為 16 第六節 假說推導 20 第三章 研究方法 25 第一節 研究架構 25 第二節 研究假設 26 第三節 研究對象 27 第四節 研究工具 28 第五節 量表信度與效度分析 34 第六節 統計分析 36 第四章 研究結果 39 第一節 樣本結構分析 39 第二節 不同背景受訪者之差異分析 42 第三節 相關分析 49 第四節 迴歸分析 51 第五節 中介效果分析 54 第六節 調節式中介效果之驗證 55 第五章 討論與建議 57 第一節 結果討論與理論貢獻 58 第二節 實務管理意涵與建議 60 第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議 62 參考文獻 65 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 僕人領導 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 建言行為 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 組織認同 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 觀點取替 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 一般自我效能 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Servant Leadership | en |
| dc.subject | General Self-Efficacy | en |
| dc.subject | Perspective Taking | en |
| dc.subject | Organizational Identification | en |
| dc.subject | Voice Behavior | en |
| dc.title | 僕人領導風格對員工建言行為之影響：調節中介模型之實證分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Impact of Servant Leadership Style on Employee Voice Behavior: An Empirical Analysis of a Moderated Mediation Model | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃家齊;陳淑貞 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Jia-Chi Huang;Shu-Chen Chen | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 僕人領導,建言行為,組織認同,觀點取替,一般自我效能, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Servant Leadership,Voice Behavior,Organizational Identification,Perspective Taking,General Self-Efficacy, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 74 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202501256 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-07-14 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 進修推廣學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物科技管理碩士在職學位學程 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2025-07-30 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 生物科技管理碩士在職學位學程 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf | 1.56 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。