請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/98073完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 劉念琪 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Nien-Chi Liu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 吳雨晉 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu-Chin Wu | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-24T16:05:23Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-07-25 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-07-24 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-07-21 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of business ethics, 97, 207–221.
Beji, R., Yousfi, O., Loukil, N., & Omri, A. (2021). Board diversity and corporate social responsibility: Empirical evidence from France. Journal of business ethics, 173, 133–155. Ben-Amar, W., Chang, M., & McIlkenny, P. (2017). Board gender diversity and corporate response to sustainability initiatives: Evidence from the carbon disclosure project. Journal of business ethics, 142(2), 369–383. Bernile, G., Bhagwat, V., & Yonker, S. (2018). Board diversity, firm risk, and corporate policies. Journal of financial economics, 127(3), 588–612. Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2006). Firm size, organizational visibility and corporate philanthropy: An empirical analysis. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(1), 6–18. Broadstock, D. C., Chan, K., Cheng, L. T., & Wang, X. (2021). The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 in China. Finance research letters, 38, 101716. Bunderson, J. S., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2002). Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Academy of management journal, 45(5), 875–893. Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial review, 38(1), 33–53. Eccles, R. G., & Klimenko, S. (2019). The investor revolution. Harvard Business Review, 97(3), 106–116. Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of management review, 24(3), 489–505. Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge university press. Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of sustainable finance & investment, 5(4), 210–233. Goyal, R., Kakabadse, N., & Kakabadse, A. (2019). Improving corporate governance with functional diversity on FTSE 350 boards: directors’ perspective. Journal of Capital Markets Studies, 3(2), 113–136. Hafsi, T., & Turgut, G. (2013). Boardroom diversity and its effect on social performance: Conceptualization and empirical evidence. Journal of business ethics, 112, 463–479. Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of management review, 9(2), 193–206. Harjoto, M., Laksmana, I., & Lee, R. (2015). Board diversity and corporate social responsibility. Journal of business ethics, 132, 641–660. Hillman, A. J., Shropshire, C., & Cannella Jr, A. A. (2007). Organizational predictors of women on corporate boards. Academy of management journal, 50(4), 941–952. Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. Kanter, R. M. (2008). Men and women of the corporation: New edition. Basic books. Krüger, P. (2015). Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth. Journal of financial economics, 115(2), 304–329. Li, N., & Wahid, A. S. (2018). Director tenure diversity and board monitoring effectiveness. Contemporary Accounting Research, 35(3), 1363–1394. Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of marketing, 70(4), 1–18. Makkonen, T. (2022). Board diversity and firm innovation: a meta-analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(6), 941–960. Manita, R., Bruna, M. G., Dang, R., & Houanti, L. H. (2018). Board gender diversity and ESG disclosure: evidence from the USA. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 19(2), 206–224. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative science quarterly, 48(2), 268–305. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92. Post, C., & Byron, K. (2015). Women on boards and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of management journal, 58(5), 1546–1571. Rao, K., & Tilt, C. (2016). Board diversity and CSR reporting: an Australian study. Meditari Accountancy Research, 24(2), 182–210. Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative science quarterly, 224–253. Siciliano, J. I. (1996). The relationship of board member diversity to organizational performance. Journal of business ethics, 15, 1313–1320. Simons, S. M., & Rowland, K. N. (2011). Diversity and its impact on organizational performance: The influence of diversity constructions on expectations and outcomes. Journal of technology management & innovation, 6(3), 171–183. Terjesen, S., Couto, E. B., & Francisco, P. M. (2016). Does the presence of independent and female directors impact firm performance? A multi-country study of board diversity. Journal of Management & Governance, 20, 447–483. Torchia, M., Calabrò, A., & Huse, M. (2011). Women directors on corporate boards: From tokenism to critical mass. Journal of business ethics, 102, 299–317. Ujunwa, A., Okoyeuzu, C., & Nwakoby, I. (2012). Corporate board diversity and firm performance: Evidence from Nigeria. Revista de Management Comparat International, 13(4), 605. Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda. Journal of applied psychology, 89(6), 1008. Velte, P. (2016). Women on management board and ESG performance. Journal of Global Responsibility, 7(1), 98–109. Zattoni, A., Leventis, S., Van Ees, H., & De Masi, S. (2023). Board diversity’s antecedents and consequences: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 34(1), 101659. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/98073 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究旨在探討董事會多樣性對企業 ESG不同構面績效之影響，並以臺灣上市櫃公司作為實證對象，研究期間為 2016 年到 2022 年。實證資料皆取自台灣經濟新報（TEJ）資料庫。
本研究建立四個模型，應變數分別為衡量企業整體 ESG 績效的 TESG 量化分數、環境構面分數、社會構面分數、公司治理構面分數。而自變數皆為本研究選定之六個不同面向多樣性變數。使用最小平方法建立迴歸模型，並在模型中加入時間及公司固定效果以避免遺漏變數偏誤。 研究結果發現董事會任期多樣性對企業整體 ESG 績效，與三大構面表現皆有顯著正向影響。而其餘類別多樣性影響效果則不顯著或為負向。顯示新舊觀點與立場的融合對企業ESG績效表現有更全方面的幫助。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study aims to examine the impact of board diversity on corporate performance across different dimensions of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance), using publicly listed companies in Taiwan as the empirical sample from 2016 to 2022. All empirical data were obtained from the Taiwan Economic Journal (TEJ) database.
Four regression models were constructed, with the dependent variables being the TESG score (measuring overall ESG performance), environmental score, social score, and governance score. The independent variables consist of six board diversity indicators selected for this study. The models were estimated using the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) method, incorporating both time and firm fixed effects to mitigate omitted variable bias. The results show that board tenure diversity has a significantly positive effect on overall ESG performance and on each of the three ESG dimensions. In contrast, the effects of other diversity variables were either insignificant or negative. These findings suggest that the integration of perspectives from directors with varying tenures contributes more comprehensively to corporate ESG performance. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-07-24T16:05:23Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-07-24T16:05:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要 I
ABSTRACT II 目次 III 圖次 V 表次 VI 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 3 第三節 研究架構 3 第二章 文獻探討與假說建立 5 第一節 ESG與企業發展相關文獻 5 第二節 董事會多樣性與決策相關理論 7 第三節 董事會多樣性與 ESG 績效關聯 10 第三章 研究方法 15 第一節 資料來源與樣本選擇 16 第二節 模型變數設定 17 第三節 模型方法 24 第四章 實證結果與分析 29 第一節 敘述性統計分析 29 第二節 迴歸分析 37 第三節 補充分析 39 第五章 研究結論與討論 42 第一節 研究結論 42 第二節 管理意義 46 第三節 研究限制與後續討論建議 47 參考文獻 49 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | ESG | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 職能多樣性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 任期多樣性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 教育多樣性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 性別多樣性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 董事會 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Educational Diversity | en |
| dc.subject | Gender Diversity | en |
| dc.subject | ESG | en |
| dc.subject | Board of Directors | en |
| dc.subject | Functional Diversity | en |
| dc.subject | Tenure Diversity | en |
| dc.title | 董事會多樣性對企業 ESG 績效的影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Impact of Board Diversity on Corporate ESG Performance | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳怡靜;陳旻男 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Yi-Ching Chen;Min-Nan Chen | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 董事會,ESG,性別多樣性,教育多樣性,任期多樣性,職能多樣性, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Board of Directors,ESG,Gender Diversity,Educational Diversity,Tenure Diversity,Functional Diversity, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 52 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202501938 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-07-22 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學研究所 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | N/A | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 商學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 3.76 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。