Skip navigation

DSpace JSPUI

DSpace preserves and enables easy and open access to all types of digital content including text, images, moving images, mpegs and data sets

Learn More
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Publication Year
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Advisor
  • Search TDR
  • Rights Q&A
    • My Page
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 創業創新管理碩士在職專班(EiMBA)
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97956
Full metadata record
???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield???ValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor郭瑞祥zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorRuey-Shan Guoen
dc.contributor.author張旭嵐zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorHsu-Lan Changen
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-23T16:14:26Z-
dc.date.available2025-07-24-
dc.date.copyright2025-07-23-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.date.submitted2025-07-09-
dc.identifier.citation中文文獻
1. Adner, R.(2022)。《生態系競爭策略:重新定義價值結構,在轉型中辨識正確的賽局》(黃庭敏譯)。台北市:天下雜誌。
2. 李佳(2023)。《共創型商業模式系統化發展架構之研究》(碩士論文)。國立臺灣科技大學。
3. 王偉(2023)。《通路系統中價值共創機制之探討:從顧客參與到行動者參與》(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。
4. 陳俊宏(2013)。《雙邊市場論文集:搜尋、配對與多重據點》(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。
5. 陳柏宇(2022)。《生態系競爭策略之個案探討》(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。
6. 黃敬雯(2023)。《輝達之平台策略與生態系競爭策略分析》(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。
英文文獻
1. Adner, R. (2006). Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, 84(4), 98–107.
2. Armstrong, M. (2006). Competition in two-sided markets. RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 668–691. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00036.x
3. Curtin, P. A. (1999). Reevaluating public relations information subsidies: Market-driven journalism and agenda-building theory and practice. Journal of Public Relations Research, 11(1), 53–90. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1101_03
4. Catalyst code: The strategies behind the world's most dynamic companies. Harvard Business School Press.
5. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
6. Evans, D. S., & Schmalensee, R. (2007). The industrial organization of markets with two-sided platforms. Competition Policy International, 3(1), 151–179.
7. Fisher, C. (2016). The trouble with 'constructive journalism'. Journalism Studies, 17(6), 723–733.
8. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.
9. Griffin, E. A. (2014). A first look at communication theory (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
10. Gandy, O. H., Jr. (1982). Beyond agenda setting: Information subsidies and public policy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
11. Gyldensted, C. (2015). From mirrors to movers: Five elements of positive psychology in constructive journalism. Charleston, SC: BookSurge Publishing.
12. Haagerup, U. (2014). Constructive news: How to save the media and democracy with journalism of tomorrow. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
13. Hallahan, K., Holtzhausen, D., van Ruler, B., Verčič, D., & Sriramesh, K. (2007). Defining strategic communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1(1), 3–35.
14. Holliman, G., & Rowley, J. (2014). Business to business digital content marketing: Marketers’ perceptions of best practice. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 8(4), 269–293.
15. Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). The keystone advantage: What the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Harvard Business School Press.
16. James F. Moore. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75–86.
17. Kiousis, S., Popescu, C., & Mitrook, M. (2007). Understanding influence on corporate reputation: An examination of public relations efforts, media coverage, and stock prices. Journal of Public Relations Research, 19(2), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627260701290661
18. Lang, G. E., & Lang, K. (1981). Watergate: An exploration of the agenda-building process. Mass Communication Review Yearbook, 2, 447-468.
19. McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187.
20. McCombs, M. E., Llamas, J. P., López- Escobar, E., & Rey, F. (1997). Candidate images in Spanish elections: Second-level agenda-setting effects. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74(4), 703–717.
21. Payne, A. F., Storbacka, K., & Frow, P. (2008). Managing the co-creation of value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0070-0
22. Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5–14.
23. Pulizzi, J. (2012). The rise of storytelling as the new marketing. Publishing Research Quarterly, 28(2), 116–123.
24. Rochet, J. C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform competition in two‐sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990–1029. https://doi.org/10.1162/154247603322493212
25. Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00326.x
26. Tuchman, G. (1978). Making news: A study in the construction of reality. Free Press.
27. Ramaswamy, V., & Ozcan, K. (2014). The co-creation paradigm. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
網路資料
1. 劉千祥、姚惠忠. (2018). 危機回應內容、形式、媒體選擇、 發言層級相對重要性之研究: 企業公關人員觀點. 《傳播與社會學刊》, (總)(第 44 期), 111–149. https://www.cschinese.com/word/3284202018.pdf
2. Fang, S.-J., & Lee, C.-F. (2017, May 31). 媒體記者與房仲之間的微妙關係 [Blog post]. Teamwork0035.http://teamwork0035.blogspot.com/2017/05/blog-post_31.html
3. Kemp, S. (2023, February 13). Digital 2023: Taiwan. DataReportal. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2023-taiwan
4. 方世杰(2016年4月14日)。釐清「價值共創」的三個質問。價值共創社群(VCC)。取自 http://teamwork0035.blogspot.com/2016/04/blog-post.html
5. 方世杰、李慶芳 (2017年5月31日)。價值共創策略思維的五步驟。產業與管理論壇(VCC價值共創社群博客)。
http://teamwork0035.blogspot.com/2017/05/blog-post_31.html
6. 張瀞勻 (2024年10月1日)。從難貸到限貸 八九月房市交易量溜滑梯。自由時報。取自 https://estate.ltn.com.tw/article/22004
7. 游智文 (2025年3月4日)。女地主暴增全台破 150 萬人 專家曝「這觀念改變了」。經濟日報。取自 https://money.udn.com/money/story/5621/8584202
8. 葉憶如 (2024年9月19日)。央行第七波打炒房 專家:房市三怕三不怕。Yahoo奇摩股市。取自
https://tw.stock.yahoo.com/news/%E5%A4%AE%E8%A1%8C%E7%AC%AC%E4%B8%83%E6%B3%95%E6%89%93%E7%82%92%E6%88%BF-%E5%B0%88%E5%AE%B6%EF%BC%9A-%E6%88%BF%E5%B8%82%E4%B8%89%E6%80%95%E4%B8%89%E4%B8%8D%E6%80%95-092337437.html
9. 潤利艾克曼企業管理顧問有限公司. (n.d.). 潤利艾克曼官網. https://www.xkm.com.tw/HTML/XKMsite/index.html
 
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97956-
dc.description.abstract本研究聚焦於平台型房仲企業如何透過「趨勢型新聞」進行媒體曝光、參與議題設定,透用價值共創理論分析,發展出「新聞價值共創」之理論模型。研究者具備新聞媒體專業與企業發言人雙重背景,長期觀察媒體與企業之間的互動變化,特別是在數位媒體快速發展與內容需求倍增的情境下,企業如何轉變為主動新聞供應者,成為產業趨勢的發聲平台。
本研究發現,相較於傳統以產品為導向的行銷型新聞,趨勢型新聞因具備資料客觀性、時事連結與公共性,更能獲得媒體青睞,成為提高媒體刊登意願與公眾關注度的有效策略。房仲平台企業藉由龐大交易數據與市場觀察,主動產製具新聞價值的報告與分析,建立自身為「市場觀察者」與「知識提供者」的專業形象,也成功與媒體共構議題,影響輿論走向。
本研究採用質性研究方法,透過深度訪談與個案分析,探索平台型企業、媒體與公眾三方之間,在新聞內容產製過程中的互動模式與價值交換關係,進而發展一套具體的「新聞價值共創 PRMAC架構」,作為企業公關策略與媒體溝通的實務指引,協助企業在品牌形象、媒體關係與社會影響力三者間達成平衡與共贏。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis study focuses on how platform-based real estate enterprises utilize trend-driven news to gain media exposure, participate in agenda-setting, and apply the concept of value co-creation to develop a theoretical model of “news value co-creation.” The researcher, with a dual background in journalism and corporate public relations, has long observed the evolving dynamics between media and corporations—particularly how, in the era of rapidly growing digital media and increasing content demands, corporations are transforming into proactive news providers and becoming influential voices within their industries.

The findings suggest that compared to traditional product-oriented press releases, trend-driven news—due to its objectivity, relevance to current events, and public interest—is more favored by the media and serves as an effective strategy to increase news coverage and public attention. Real estate platform companies leverage extensive transaction data and market insights to proactively produce newsworthy reports and analyses, thereby establishing themselves as professional "market observers" and "knowledge providers." In doing so, they collaborate with the media to shape public discourse and influence opinion trends.

Adopting a qualitative research methodology, this study employs in-depth interviews and case analysis to explore the interaction patterns and value exchange relationships among platform-based enterprises, media, and the public in the news production process. The research further develops the PRMAC framework of News Value Co-Creation Model as a practical for corporate public relations strategies and media communication. The framework serves as a guide to help businesses achieve a balance and win-win relationship among brand image, media relations, and social influence.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-07-23T16:14:26Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2025-07-23T16:14:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents感言與誌謝 i
中文摘要 iii
ABSTRACT iv
目次 vi
表次 ix
圖次 x
第一章、緒論 1
第一節、研究動機與背景 1
第二節、研究問題與研究目的 4
第三節、研究方法 5
第四節、論文架構 6
第二章、文獻探討 8
第一節、商業模式 8
第二節、趨勢導向新聞與議題設定理論 11
第三節、企業媒體曝光策略與內容行銷 13
第四節、價值共創理論 14
第三章、新聞價值共創概念 17
第一節、「新聞價值共創」的概念建構 17
第二節、在房仲產業中的三贏實踐意義 21
第三節、新聞價值共創的未來意義 21
第四章、研究方法 23
第一節、研究設計與取樣策略 23
第二節、深度訪談方法 23
第三節、資料分析與編碼流程 25
第四節、研究信效度說明 27
第五章、房仲業的媒體公關策略現況 28
第一節、 常見企業媒體曝光策略類別 28
第二節、 房仲業趨勢導向新聞的產製模式 30
第三節、趨勢新聞 vs 行銷新聞 34
第六章、新聞價值共創模型應用研究 37
第一節、訪談者背景 37
第二節、訪談重點節錄 38
第三節、訪談結語 54
第七章、結論與建議 56
第一節、 研究發現 56
第二節、研究省思 68
第三節、研究限制 70
參考文獻 72
中文文獻 72
英文文獻 72
網路資料 74
附錄 76
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subject新聞價值共創zh_TW
dc.subject趨勢型新聞zh_TW
dc.subject平台型企業zh_TW
dc.subject房仲業zh_TW
dc.subject品牌新聞學zh_TW
dc.subject媒體策略zh_TW
dc.subject媒體公關zh_TW
dc.subjectPRMAC架構zh_TW
dc.subjectPRMAC Frameworken
dc.subjectNews Value Co-Creationen
dc.subjectTrend-Driven Newsen
dc.subjectPlatform-Based Enterpriseen
dc.subjectReal Estate Brokerage Industryen
dc.subjectBrand Journalismen
dc.subjectMedia Strategyen
dc.subjectMedia Relationsen
dc.title平台型房仲企業 新聞價值共創之PRMAC架構zh_TW
dc.titleThe PRMAC Framework for News Value Co-Creation by Platform-Based Real Estate Enterprisesen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear113-2-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.coadvisor陸洛zh_TW
dc.contributor.coadvisorLuo Luen
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee何耕宇;陳俊忠zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeKeng-Yu Ho;Chun-Chung Chenen
dc.subject.keyword新聞價值共創,趨勢型新聞,平台型企業,房仲業,品牌新聞學,媒體策略,媒體公關,PRMAC架構,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordNews Value Co-Creation,Trend-Driven News,Platform-Based Enterprise,Real Estate Brokerage Industry,Brand Journalism,Media Strategy,Media Relations,PRMAC Framework,en
dc.relation.page84-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202501618-
dc.rights.note未授權-
dc.date.accepted2025-07-11-
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept創業創新管理碩士在職專班-
dc.date.embargo-liftN/A-
Appears in Collections:創業創新管理碩士在職專班(EiMBA)

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
ntu-113-2.pdf
  Restricted Access
1.79 MBAdobe PDF
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved