請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97921完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 詹瀅潔 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Ying-Chieh Chan | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Truong Nhat Minh Chau | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Truong Nhat Minh Chau | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-23T16:06:42Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-07-24 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-07-23 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-07-20 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | (UK), Department for Transport. Cycle infrastructure design. United Kingdom, 2008.
AASHTO, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Guide for the development of bicycle facilities (4th ed.). 2012. Amed, Tufal, Ali Pirdavani, Geert Wets, and Davy Janssens. "Bicycle infrastructure design principles in Urban bikeability indices: A systematic review." Sustainability 16, no. 6 (March 2024): 25-45. Beecham, R., C. Cooper, and J. S. Mindell. "Connected bikeability in London: A network-based approach for measuring and improving cycling infrastructure." Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 2023. Bicycle.org. The Bicycle Club: The Best Bike Lanes in the World: 12 Cities Doing it Right. 2025. https://bicycle.org/the-best-bike-lanes-in-the-world-12-cities-doing-it-right/. Carvalho, Marina V., Paulo Noriega, David Vale, and Francisco Rebelo. "Intersection Roadway Marking Design: Effects Over Cyclist’s Safety Perception." In HCI International 2023- Late Breaking Paper. 2023. Cervero, Robert, and Danielle Dai. "BRT TOD: Leveraging transit-oriented development with bus rapid transit investments." Transport Policy,36, 2014: 127-138. Codina, Oriol, Monika Maciejewska, Jordi Nadal, and Oriol Marquet. "Built environment bikeability as a predictor of cycling frequency: Lessons from Barcelona." Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives 16 (2022): 1-10. Communication, Ministry of Transportation and. "市區道路及附屬工程設計規範 [Urban road and ancillary engineering design specifications]." https://www.nlma.gov.tw/filesys/file/chinese/law/c1130912-1.pdf, 2024. CROW. Design manual for bicycle traffic. 2007. Cunha, Isabel, and Cecilia Silva. "Assessing the equity impact of cycling infrastructure allocation: Implications for planning practice." Transport Policy 133 (2022): 15-26. Delclos-Alió, Xavier, and Wilber den Hoed. "Perceptions of potential cycling infrastructure in a low-cycling context: Evidence from a medium-sized urban area." International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 18, no. 12 (November 2024): 1-13. Dill, Jennifer, and Theresa Carr. "Bicycle Commuting and Facilities in Major U.S. Cities: If You Build Them, Commuters Will Use Them." Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1828, no. 1 (2003). Dittmar, H., and G. Ohland. The new transit town: Best practices in transit-oriented development. Transportation research board, 2024. Forsyth, Ann, and Kevin J. Krizek. "Urban design: Is there a distinctive view from the bicycle." Journal of Urban design 16, no. 4 (2009): 532-549. Giuffrida, Nadia, Giuseppe Inturri, Matteo Ignaccolo, and Martina Fazio. "A GIS-BASED MULTI CRITERIA APPROACH FOR THE DESIGN OF A CYCLING NETWORK IN THE CITY OF CATANIA." International Conference on Traffic and Transport Engineering. Belgrade, 2018. Guerreiro, Thais de Cássia Martinelli, Janice Kirner Providelo, Cira Souza Pitombo, Rui Antonio Rodrigues Ramos, and Nelso Antonio Rodrigues da Silva. "Data-mining, GIS and multicriteria analysis in a comprehensive method for bicycle network planning and design." International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 12, no. 3 (2018): 179-191. Kaplan, Sigal. "Safety perceptions and reported behavior related to cycling in mixed traffic: A comparison between Brisbane and Copenhagen." Transportation Research, 2014. Krenn, Patricia, Pekka Oja, and Sylvia Titze. "Development of a Bikeability Index to assess the bicycle-friendliness of urban environments." Open Journal of Civil Engineering 5 (December 2015): 451-459. Lin, Jen-Jia, and Yi-Hsuan Wei. "Assessing area-wide bikeability: A grey analytic network process." Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2018. Mekuria, Maaze C., Peter G. Furth, and Hilary Nixon. Low-Stress Bicycling and Network Connectivity. MTI Project 1005, California: Mineta Transportation Institute, 2012. Parkin, John. Design for cycle traffic. Thomas Telford Ltd, 2018. Plasencia-Lozano, Pedro, Estela Pantiga-Facal, and Irene Méndez-Manjón. "No AccessMethodology for planning short-term urban bike lane networks; an example of downtown Gijón." Urban Design and Planning 177, no. 2 (2024): 75-90. Pucher, John, and Ralph Buehler. City Cycling. MIT Press, 2012. Schmid-Querg, Jonas, Andreas Keler, and Georgios Grigoropoulos. "The Munich Bikeability Index: A Practical Approach for Measuring Urban Bikeability." Sustainability, January 2021: 13(1), 428. Vale, David Sousa, and Mauro F. Pereira. "Influence on pedestrian commuting behavior of the built environment surrounding destinations: A structural equations modeling approach." International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 10, no. 8 (2016). WHO. World Health Organization. May 8, 2025. https://www.who.int/health-topics/physical-activity/promoting-walking-and-cycling. Winters, Meghan, Kay Teschke, Michael Grant, Michael Brauer, and Eleanor M. Setton. "How Far Out of the Way Will We Travel?: Built Environment Influences on Route Selection for Bicycle and Car Travel." Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2010. Yen, Barbara T.H., Corinne Mulley, and Chia-Jung Yeh. "How public shared bike can assist first and last mile accessibility: A case study of the MRT system in Taipei City, Taiwan." Journal of Transport Geography, 2023. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97921 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究透過檢視既有道路基礎建設,評估臺北市的自行車通行友善程度(bikeability)。研究方法結合問卷調查與地理資訊系統(GIS),先分析居民日常騎乘自行車之觀感與行為,再進一步評估現有道路是否符合其通勤與安全舒適之需求。本研究成果不僅驗證臺北都會區具有高度的自行車通行潛力,亦揭示都市設計中自行車動線連結性與服務半徑的限制,作為未來政策管理與發展方向之第一步。
本研究方法架構涵蓋三個層面:(1)透過臺北市自行車友善度網路問卷調查,結合短影音展示不同道路設計,分析民眾騎乘觀感;(2)以地理空間資料分析道路與公共設施維度,並輔以 SQL 語言進行資料查詢與分析;(3)整合自行車基礎設施與輔助元素價值,進行通行友善度地圖繪製。 研究結果顯示,臺北市居民在騎乘安全性上的主要關切為:設有獨立自行車道與騎乘於人行道上相較於與機動車併行之安全舒適性更高。在住宅區範圍內,騎士更偏好禁止汽車通行之路段,並希望設置更多警示標誌以減少低視距轉角與行人發生意外之風險。根據受訪結果,GIS 系統針對基礎建設進行空間分析,聚焦於人行道寬度與自行車道可行性,以及道路功能類型進行分類,以評估既有自行車路網之覆蓋範圍。分析結果顯示,臺北市目前在人行道上設有約194公里之獨立自行車道,尚有103公里具潛力可改造為自行車道,惟仍有約477公里(佔人行道總長度之61%)因空間或設計限制,暫難以直接改造。 本研究進一步將分析成果納入一套連結性地圖繪製架構,並與現有自行車基礎設施空間資料整合,包括公共自行車租借站之分布與土地使用型態,藉此反映出各區吸引目的地之通行性。最終成果為一份描繪臺北市七個核心行政區自行車通行友善程度之地圖。其中,中正區、大同區、大安區、中山區與信義區表現出較高之騎乘舒適程度;而萬華區則為通行友善度最低之區域,松山區則顯示其與周邊區域在自行車通行連結性上較為薄弱。 本研究針對都市管理與設計提供重要建議,推動綠色運輸與永續都市發展,進而朝向淨零排放之目標邁進。本研究結果係綜合社會觀點與地理資料分析所得,顯示未來都市建設中大數據應用之潛力。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study assesses the bikeability of Taipei city through insight of existing road infrastructure examining. Using both the survey and geographic information system (GIS), it performs the residential ‘s usual perception in cycling, then evaluates the road capacity that is suitable for their routine and safety comfort. The achievement is not only convience the high bikeability in Taipei metropolis but also illustrates the limit of connection and bike service distance in urban design, those is the first step in managing and deciding developing policies in future.
The method framework employed three aspects: (1) Taipei bikeability online survey that compares the different road design from cycling visual short videos, (2) road and amenities dimensions analysis by geographic data examining with languages query programming SQL supportation, and (3) bikeability mapping via cycle infrastructure and supporting components values integrating. The findings demonstrate the Taipei residential cycling concerns are individual bike lanes and riding on sidewalks creating more safety comfort than riding next to automatics vehicles. Inside the neighborhood areas, cyclists prefer prohibited car routes and more signs to prevent accidents with walkers in limited visibility conners. From those interview results, geographic system examines infrastructure data focusing on sidewalks width capacity that bike lane creation and road function type analysis to rate the coverage of existing bike routes. These reveal Taipei completed nearly 194km of individual bike lanes on sidewalks and still 103km sidewalks are able to reform for cycling, however there are still 477km sidewalks that cannot reform directly, taking 61% total sidewalks length. The analysis results were incorporated into a connectivity mapping framework and subsequently integrated with spatial data on existing cycling infrastructure, including the distribution of bike-sharing stations and land use patterns representing attractive destinations. The final output is a map illustrating the level of bikeability across seven central districts of Taipei City. Among these, Zhongzheng, Datong, Daan, Zhongshan, and Xinyi districts exhibit a high degree of cycling comfort. Meanwhile, Wanhua district is identified as having the lowest bikeability index, while Songshan District appears to be poorly connected to adjacent districts in terms of cycling accessibility. This bikeability research provided important suggestions for urban management, designing and developing that enhance sustainable mobility toward net-zero emissions exhibition. The analyzing results are conclusions from social perspectives and geographic collect data operating illustrating the big data implementation in next urban projects. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-07-23T16:06:42Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-07-23T16:06:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | TABLE OF CONTENTS
MATER’S THESIS ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATION i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ii 摘要 iii ABSTRACT v TABLE OF CONTENTS vii LIST OF TABLES ix LIST OF FIGURES x INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Bikeability definition 1 1.2 Bikeability approaching and research gaps 3 1.3 Research questions 6 1.4 Research objectives 7 1.5 Research structures 8 LITERATURE REVIEW 10 2.1 Cycling infrastructure enhancement 10 2.2 Safety and comfort cycling perception 13 2.3 Geographic information system in bikeability analysis 14 2.4 Literature summary 16 METHOD FRAMEWORK 18 3.1 Research boundary and data source 18 3.2 Research framework 20 3.3 Taipei cycling preference design 21 3.3.1 Bike lane design references 21 3.3.2 Bikeability survey 25 3.4 Geographic data analysis framework 27 3.4.1 Geographic road informations analysis 27 3.4.2 Other factors influencing bikeability 32 3.4.3 Bikeability assessment 36 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 38 4.1 Statistic of survey answering 38 4.2 Potential infrastructure analysis 47 4.3 Mapping results of Bikeability-Related Factors 52 4.4 Summary of Taipei bikeability 58 4.5 Discussion and limitations 60 CONCLUSION 65 References 67 APPENDIX 1: Bikeability survey 70 APPENDIX 2: SQL code for information tranfer 84 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Bikeability methodology and results in different context 4 Table 2: Comparision of bikeability GIS dataset usage and their scopes 15 Table 3: Data sources and collection 19 Table 4: Road identification and bikeability factor in online survey 26 Table 5: Land Use Classification and Coefficient Index 35 Table 6: Level of user preference in Taipei cycling environment over road types 42 Table 7: The images depicting cycling comfort and the associated influencing factors were derived from participants' suggestions. 46 Table 8: The information table of instance area after evaluation 51 Table 9: Youbike statistic and ratio of bike service capacity and its accessibility 54 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Relevent principles in bikeability development, (Amed, et al. 2024) 6 Figure 2. Intersection for cyclist visual perception scenarios (Carvalho et al.,2022) 14 Figure 3: Researh boundary – The seven center districts in Taipei 18 Figure 4: Research processing methodology 21 Figure 5: Bicycle lanes type design manual in Taiwan urban context 23 Figure 6: Sign infrastructure for cycling 24 Figure 7: Instance of the layers and orignal information from geographic data collection 28 Figure 8. Geographic information exchange by SQL quering with road data 29 Figure 9 : Geographic information exchange by SQL queries with road data 31 Figure 10: Example area of Youbike station service area following road analysis 34 Figure 11: Overview cycling routine in Taipei 39 Figure 12: Results of cycling environmental images perception 41 Figure 13: Factors effect cycling comfort on main road type 43 Figure 14: Factors effect cycling comfort on main road type 44 Figure 15. Factors effect cycling comfort on main road type 45 Figure 16: Sidewalk capacity for bike lane tranformation 48 Figure 17: Sidewalk statistic chart for bikeability transforming 49 Figure 18: Sidewalk design for bikeability enhancement by districts 50 Figure 19: Instance of sidewalks data after evaluation and bikeability adaptation results 51 Figure 20: Cycling infrastructure presence and connectivity 53 Figure 21. Youbike numerous distribution and acessibility ratio 54 Figure 22: Bike sharing system in 200m accesibility 56 Figure 23: Attractived destinations for cyclists evaluation 58 Figure 24: Taipei bikeability map 59 Figure 25: Bikeability detail instance in Daan district. 60 Figure 26: The limited factors on this study 64 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject | 自行車政策 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 慢速交通發展 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 永續都市 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 綠色運輸 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 都市治理 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 自行車政策 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 自行車通行友善 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 慢速交通發展 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 永續都市 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 綠色運輸 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 都市治理 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 自行車通行友善 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Slow mobility development | en |
| dc.subject | Bikeability | en |
| dc.subject | Urban management | en |
| dc.subject | Green mobility | en |
| dc.subject | Sustainable metropolis | en |
| dc.subject | Slow mobility development | en |
| dc.subject | Bikeability | en |
| dc.subject | Urban management | en |
| dc.subject | Green mobility | en |
| dc.subject | Sustainable metropolis | en |
| dc.title | 邁向自行車友善的台北:整合問卷調查與 GIS 進行道路基礎設施評估 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Toward Taipei Bikeability: Intergrating Survey-Based and GIS approach in Road Infrastructure Assessment | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 許聿廷;林偲妘 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Yu-Ting Hsu;Szu-Yu Lin | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 自行車通行友善,自行車政策,都市治理,綠色運輸,永續都市,慢速交通發展, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Bikeability,Urban management,Green mobility,Sustainable metropolis,Slow mobility development, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 85 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202501710 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-07-22 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2025-07-24 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用(校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務) | 7.62 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
