請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97871完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳建中 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Chien-Chung Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳澄萱 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Cheng-Hsuan Chen | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-21T16:04:50Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-07-22 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-07-21 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-07-07 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Chinese References
陳建中、卓淑玲、曾榮瑜（2013）：〈台灣地區華人情緒與相關心理生理資料庫─專業表演者臉部表情常模資料〉。《中華心理學刊》， 55（4)， 439–454。 https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.20130314 English References Abbas, Z.-A., & Duchaine, B. (2008). The role of holistic processing in judgments of facial attractiveness. Perception, 37, 1187–1196. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5984 Abele, A. E., Hauke, N., Peters, K., Louvet, E., Szymkow, A., & Duan, Y. (2016). Facets of the fundamental content dimensions: agency with competence and assertiveness—communion with warmth and morality. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01810 Angeli, A., Davidoff, J., & Valentine, T. (2008). Face familiarity, distinctiveness, and categorical perception. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 690–707. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210701399305 Ashby, F. G. (1992). Multidimensional Models of Categorization. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Barton, J. J. S., Radcliffe, N., Cherkasova, M. V., Edelman, J., & Intriligator, J. M. (2006). Information processing during face recognition: the effects of familiarity, inversion, and morphing on scanning fixations. Perception, 35(8), 1089–1105. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5547 Beale, J. M., & Keil, F. C. (1995). Categorical effects in the perception of faces. Cognition, 57, 217–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(95)00669-X Berry, D. S. (2000). Attractiveness, attraction, and sexual selection: evolutionary perspectives on the form and function of physical attractiveness. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 273–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(00)80007-6 Bradshaw, J. L., & Wallacei, G. (1971). Models for the processing and identification of faces. Perception & Psychophysics, 9, 443–448. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210249 Brielmann, A. A., & Pelli, D. G. (2017). Beauty requires thought. Current Biology, 27(10), 1506-1513.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.04.018 Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77(3), 305–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1986.tb02199.x Calder, A. J., Young, A. W., Keane, J., & Dean, M. P. (2000). Configural information in facial expression perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 26(2), 527–551. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.26.2.527 Calvo, M. G., Gutiérrez-García, A., & Beltrán, D. (2018). Neural time course and brain sources of facial attractiveness vs. trustworthiness judgment. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 18(6), 1233–1247. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-018-0634-0 Carey, S., & Diamond, R. (1977). From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces. Science, 195(4275), 312–314. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.831281 Chang, F., & Chou, C.-H. (2009). A bi-prototype theory of facial attractiveness. Neural Computation, 21(3), 890–910. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.2008.07-07-566 Chen, C.-C., Kao, K.-L. C., & Tyler, C. W. (2007). Face configuration processing in the human brain: the role of symmetry. Cerebral Cortex, 17(6), 1423–1432. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhl054 Dietrich, P., & Knieper, T. (2022). (Neuro)Aesthetics: beauty, ugliness, and ethics. PsyCh Journal, 11(5), 619–627. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.478 Eco, U. (2007). On Ugliness. Rizzoli USA. Etcoff, N., & Magee, J. J. (1992). Categorical perception of facial expressions. Cognition, 44, 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(92)90002-Y Fantz, R. L. (1961). The origin of form perception. Scientific American, 204, 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0561-66 Fink, B., Neave, N., Manning, J. T., & Grammer, K. (2006). Facial symmetry and judgements of attractiveness, health and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(3), 491–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.01.017 Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994). Human (homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108(3), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.108.3.233 Hu, Y., Abbasi, N. ul H., Zhang, Y., & Chen, H. (2018). The effect of target sex, sexual dimorphism, and facial attractiveness on perceptions of target attractiveness and trustworthiness. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 942. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00942 Itier, R. J., Alain, C., Sedore, K., & McIntosh, A. R. (2007). Early face processing specificity: it’s in the eyes! Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(11), 1815–1826. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.11.1815 Jones, A., & Jaeger, B. (2019). Biological bases of beauty revisited: the effect of symmetry, averageness, and sexual dimorphism on female facial Attractiveness. Symmetry, 11(2), 279. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11020279 Klebl, C., Greenaway, K. H., Rhee, J. J., & Bastian, B. (2021). Ugliness judgments alert us to cues of pathogen presence. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(5), 617–628. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620931655 Konar, Y., Bennett, P. J., & Sekuler, A. B. (2010). Holistic processing is not correlated with face-identification accuracy. Psychological Science, 21, 38–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797609356508 Kramer, R. S. S., & Jones, A. L. (2022). Incomplete faces are completed using a more average face. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-022-00429-y Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3), 390. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390 Langlois, J. H., & Roggman, L. A. (1990). Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science, 1(2), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00079.x Leder, H., & Bruce, V. (2000). When inverted faces are recognized: the role of configural information in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 53(2), 513–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755889 Lin, J., & Zhou, G. (2021). Chinese aesthetic mask: three forehead and five eyes—holistic processing and facial attractiveness. Perception, 50, 540–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/03010066211015542 Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2011). Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1571), 1638–1659. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0404 O’Doherty, J., Winston, J., Critchley, H., Perrett, D., Burt, D. M., & Dolan, R. J. (2003). Beauty in a smile: the role of medial orbitofrontal cortex in facial attractiveness. Neuropsychologia, 41(2), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00145-8 O’Toole, A. J., Deffenbacher, K. A., Valentin, D., & Abdi, H. (1994). Structural aspects of face recognition and the other-race effect. Memory & Cognition, 22, 208–224. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208892 Pazhoohi, F., & Kingstone, A. (2022). Unattractive faces are more attractive when the bottom-half is masked, an effect that reverses when the top-half is concealed. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 7(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-022-00359-9 Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E., & Lindeløv, J. K. (2019). Psychopy2: experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y Perrett, D. I., May, K. A., & Yoshikawa, S. (1994). Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness. Nature, 368(6468), 239–242. https://doi.org/10.1038/368239a0 Rhodes, G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 199–226. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208 Rhodes, G., Hickford, C., & Jeffery, L. (2000). Sex‐typicality and attractiveness: are supermale and superfemale faces super‐attractive? British Journal of Psychology, 91(1), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712600161718 Rosa, A. O.-L., Villacampa, J., Corradi, G., & Ingram, G. P. (2021). The creepy, the bad and the ugly: exploring perceptions of moral character and social desirability in uncanny faces. Current Psychology, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01452-w Rosch, E. H. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4(3), 328–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90017-0 Rotshtein, P., Henson, R. N. A., Treves, A., Driver, J., & Dolan, R. J. (2005). Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face representations in the brain. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1370 Rubenstein, A. J., Langlois, J. H., & Roggman, L. A. (2002). What makes a face attractive and why: the role of averageness in defining facial beauty. Facial Attractiveness: Evolutionary, Cognitive, and Social Perspectives., 1–33. Saegusa, C., & Watanabe, K. (2016). Judgments of facial attractiveness as a combination of facial parts information over time: social and aesthetic factors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(2), 173–179. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000149 Sekuler, A. B., Gaspar, C. M., Gold, J. M., & Bennett, P. J. (2004). Inversion leads to quantitative, not qualitative, changes in face processing. Current Biology, 14, 391–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.02.028 Shyi, G. (2013). Taiwan corpora of Chinese emotions and relevant psychophysiological data—a college-student database of facial expression for basic emotions. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 55, 455–474. https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.20121226 Sutherland, C. A. M., Rhodes, G., & Young, A. W. (2017). Facial image manipulation: a tool for investigating social perception. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(5), 538–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617697176 Valentine, T. (1988). Upside-down faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 79(4), 471–491. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1988.tb02747.x Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 43(2), 161–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749108400966 Van Dongen, S. (2011). Associations between asymmetry and human attractiveness: possible direct effects of asymmetry and signatures of publication bias. Annals of Human Biology, 38(3), 317–323. https://doi.org/10.3109/03014460.2010.544676 Villavisanis, D. F., Workman, C. I., Zapatero, Z. D., Vu, G. H., Humphries, S. A., Blum, J. D., Cho, D. Y., Swanson, J. W., Bartlett, S. P., Chatterjee, A., & Taylor, J. A. (2023). Visual attention, bias, and social dispositions toward people with facial anomalies: a prospective study with eye-tracking technology. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 90(5), 482–486. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000003435 Workman, C. I., Humphries, S., Hartung, F., Aguirre, G. K., Kable, J. W., & Chatterjee, A. (2021). Morality is in the eye of the beholder: the neurocognitive basis of the “anomalous‐is‐bad” stereotype. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1494(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14575 Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141–145. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027474 Young, A. W., Hellawell, D., & Hay, D. C. (1987). Configurational information in face perception. Perception, 16(6), 747–759. https://doi.org/10.1068/p160747 Zhan, J., Liu, M., Garrod, O. G. B., Daube, C., Ince, R. A. A., Jack, R. E., & Schyns, P. G. (2021). Modeling individual preferences reveals that face beauty is not universally perceived across cultures. Current Biology, 31(10), 2243-2252.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.03.013 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97871 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 藝術理論有此一說，「不美」並不等同於「醜」，「不美」可能只是不起眼。本論文研究臉部吸引力背後的認知機制，探討「美」和「醜」的是否屬於不同的類別，或是屬於單一類別中的兩個概念。研究透過兩個實驗來檢驗「美」與「醜」之間的關係，並評估臉部吸引力的判斷是否和臉部辨識一樣，使用整體性處理，還是使用分析性處理。實驗一的結果顯示「美」與「醜」在同一類別內，挑戰了將「醜」視為與「美」不同的類別的藝術理論。實驗二則使用多維度訊號偵測模型，分析上半臉和下半臉對吸引力判斷的影響。結果表明，臉部吸引力判斷主要是分析性的，半臉之間的交互作用有限。臉與一個原型臉的差距，足以解釋吸引力。這些發現增進了對臉部感知的理論理解，並挑戰「美」與「醜」之間的差異。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Within theories of art, it is suggested that the absence of beauty does not equate to ugliness, but merely unremarkable. This thesis investigates the cognitive mechanisms underlying facial attractiveness judgments, exploring whether judgments of “beauty” and “ugliness” represent distinct categories or are points along a single continuum. With two experiments, the study examines the relationship between facial beauty and ugliness and evaluates whether facial attractiveness judgments rely on holistic or analytic processing as theorized in facial recognition. Experiment 1 uses psychophysics to reveal that beauty and ugliness align within the same dimension, challenging the art theory that posits ugliness as a distinct category from beauty. Experiment 2 uses the multidimensional signal detection model to analyze how upper and lower face halves each contribute to the judgement of facial attractiveness. Contrary to present studies in facial recognition, results indicate that facial attractiveness judgments are primarily analytic, with limited interaction between face halves. Furthermore, deviations from a single prototype face are sufficient to explain facial attractiveness. These findings refine theoretical frameworks in face perception, providing insights into how humans evaluate facial attractiveness and further challenging distinctions between beauty and ugliness. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-07-21T16:04:50Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-07-21T16:04:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Acknowledgements i
摘要 ii Abstract iii Table of Contents iv List of Figures v List of Tables vi 1. General Introduction 1 2. Experiment 1 6 2.1. Introduction 6 2.2. Method 7 2.3. Results 11 2.4. Discussion 14 3. Experiment 2 17 3.1. Introduction 17 3.2. Method 20 3.3. Results 26 3.4. Discussion 35 4. General Discussion 37 5. References 39 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject | 吸引力 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 多維度訊號偵測 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 心理物理學 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 原型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 醜陋 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 吸引力 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 臉孔知覺 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 多維度訊號偵測 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 心理物理學 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 原型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 醜陋 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 臉孔知覺 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Multidimensional signal detection | en |
| dc.subject | Face Perception | en |
| dc.subject | Attractiveness | en |
| dc.subject | Ugliness | en |
| dc.subject | Prototype | en |
| dc.subject | Psychophysics | en |
| dc.subject | Multidimensional signal detection | en |
| dc.subject | Face Perception | en |
| dc.subject | Attractiveness | en |
| dc.subject | Ugliness | en |
| dc.subject | Prototype | en |
| dc.subject | Psychophysics | en |
| dc.title | 臉孔典型性對美醜知覺的影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Effects of Prototypicality on Perceived Facial Beauty and Ugliness | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃淑麗;黃碧群 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Shwu-Lih Huang;Pi-Chun Huang | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 臉孔知覺,吸引力,醜陋,原型,心理物理學,多維度訊號偵測, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Face Perception,Attractiveness,Ugliness,Prototype,Psychophysics,Multidimensional signal detection, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 46 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202501321 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-07-08 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | N/A | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.3 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。