Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97743Full metadata record
| ???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 連韻文 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Yunn-Wen Lien | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 魏里耘 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Li-Yun Wei | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-16T16:07:37Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-07-17 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-07-16 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-07-09 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 李政霆(2025):〈從自我覺察、能動感到幸福感:探討身心中軸覺察課程對 幸福感的提升效果與機制〉(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學心理學系。
車先蕙、盧孟良、陳錫中、張尚文、李宇宙(2006):〈中文版貝克焦慮量表 之信效度〉。《台灣醫學》，10，447-454。 林一真(2000):《貝克焦慮量表(中文版)》。台北:中國行為科學社。 姚開屏、陳坤虎(1998):〈如何編製一份問卷:以“健康相關生活品質”問卷為例〉。《職能治療學會雜誌》，16，1-24。 翁宛婷(2020)。〈探討短期動態身心覺察課程對國小教師內感覺覺察、心理韌性與壓力知覺的介入成效〉(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系。 陸洛(2012)。〈工作與家庭的意義對因應職家衝突的影響─華人雙文化自我觀之展現〉。 《本土心理學研究》，37，141-189。 張仁和、孫蒨如、葉光輝(2019)。〈華人本土自我研究的回顧與前瞻〉。《本土心理學研究》，51，3-31。 許惟智(2020)。〈探討兩週身心中軸覺察練習對大學生情緒調節的成效及覺察傾向、工作記憶的中介角色〉(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學心理學研究所。 連韻文、鄧善娟、任純慧、祁業榮(2019)。〈禮樂傳統最優意識經驗的進路:雅樂舞身心功效初探〉。《應用心理研究》，70，123-184。 郭士賢(2002)。〈從“天人類比”再思“控制觀”:一個行動理論的觀點〉。《本土心理學研究》，17，269-307。 陳心怡(2000):《貝克憂鬱量表第二版(中文版)指導手冊》。台北:中國行為科學社。 黃毓華、鄭英耀。(1996)。〈一般性自我效能量表之修訂〉。《中國測驗學 會測驗年刊》，43，279–286。 鄧善娟、連韻文、魏里耘(2024)。〈回到身體，從心所欲，找回平衡:探討身心中軸覺察練習對內感覺、能動感與憂鬱的提升效用與其間關係〉。台灣心理學會第六十三屆年會，台北:國立台灣大學心理學系，2024 年 10 月26日。 盧孟良、車先蕙、張尚文、沈武典(2002)。〈中文版貝克憂鬱量表第二版之 信度和效度〉。《台灣精神醫學》，16，301-310。 Asai, T., K., T., Sugimori, E., & Tanno, Y. (2009). 自己主体感を測定する尺度の 開発と因子構造の探索. The Japanese Journal of psychology, 80(5), 414-421. Ataria, Y. (2014). Dissociation during trauma: the ownership-agency tradeoff model.Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 14(4), 1037-1053.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-014-9392-9 Ataria, Y. (2015). Sense of ownership and sense of agency during trauma.Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 14(1), 199-212.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-013-9334-y Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147. Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Association for Psychological Science, 1(2), 164-180. Beck, A. T., & Steer, R. A. (1990). Manual for the Beck anxiety inventory. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Beck depression inventory-II. San Antonio, 78(2), 490-498. Bellack, A. S., & Drapalski, A. (2012). Issues and developments on the consumer recovery construct. World Psychiatry, 11, 156-160. Bentler, P. M., & Bonnet, D. C. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606. Bermúdez, J. L. (2018).The bodily Self. Selected Essays on self-consciousness. The MIT Press. Boland, R., & Verduin, L. M. (2022). Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders.In R. Boland & L. M. Verduin (Eds.), Kaplan and Sadock’s Synopsis of Psychiatry (12 ed.). Wolters Kluwer. Boland, R., & Verduin, L. M. (2022). Depressive Disorders. In R. Boland & L. M.Verduin (Eds.), Kaplan and Sadock’s Synopsis of Psychiatry (12 ed.). Wolters Kluwer. Braun, N., Debener, S., Spychala, N., Bongartz, E., Soros, P., Muller, H. H. O., & Philipsen, A. (2018). The Senses of Agency and Ownership: A Review.Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 535. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00535 Brosschot, J. F., Gerin, W., & Thayer, J. F. (2006). The perseverative cognition hypothesis: A review of worry, prolonged stress-related physiological activation, and health. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 60(2), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.06.074 Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage Focus Editions, 154,136-136. Cabrera-Nguyen, P. (2010). Author guidelines for reporting scale development and validation results in the Journal of the Society for Social Work and Researh. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 1(2), 99-103. doi: 10.5243/jsswr.2010.8 Carpenter, S. (2018). Ten Steps in Scale Development and Reporting: A Guide for Researchers. Communication Methods and Measures, 12(1), 25-44. doi:10.1080/19312458.2017.1396583 Chen, S. X., Chan, W., Bond, M. H., & Stewart, S. M. (2006). The effects of self- efficacy and relationship harmony on depression across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37(6), 643–658. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022106292075 Colle, L., Hilviu, D., Rossi, R., Garbarini, F., & Fossataro, C. (2020). Self-Harming and Sense of Agency in Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 449. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00449 Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis: Four Recommendations for Getting the Most From Your Analysis. Practical Assessment Research and Evaluation, 10(7),1-9. Cohen, J. (1988). Stastistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJL Lawrence Erbaum Associatiates, Publishers. Damasio, A. (2010). Self comes to mind: Constructing the conscious brain. Pantheon Books. Damush, T. M., Myers, L. J., Strumpf, N. E., Clark, D. O., Buckley, C., Wu, J., ... & Kroenke, K. (2016). Pain self-management training increases self-efficacy, self- management behaviours and pain and depression outcomes. European Journal of Pain, 20(7), 1070–1078. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.831 Deans, C. E., McIlwain, D., & Geeves, A. (2015). The interpersonal development of an embodied sense of agency. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, research, and practice, 2(3), 315. De Houwer, J. (2003). A structural analysis of indirect measures of attitudes. The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion, 1, 219-244. de Vignemont, F. (2018). Mind the body: An exploration of bodily self-awareness.Oxford University Press. Ebert, J. P., & Wegner, D. M. (2010). Time warp: authorship shapes the perceived timing of actions and events. Conscious Cognition, 19(1), 481-489.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2009.10.002 Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J.(1999).Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082- 989X.4.3.272 Farb, N., Daubenmier, J., Price, C. J., Gard, T., Kerr, C., Dunn, B. D., ... & Mehling, W. E. (2015). Interoception, contemplative practice, and health. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 763. Foa, E. B., Huppert, J. D., Leiberg, S., Langner, R., Kichic, R., Hajcak, G., & Salkovskis, P. M. (2002). The Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory: development and validation of a short version. Psychological Assessment, 14(4), 485. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50. Fradkin, I., Eitam, B., Strauss, A. Y., & Huppert, D. J. (2019). Thought as an un expected intruders: context, obsession-compulsive symptoms, and the sense of agency over thoughts. Clinical Psychology Science, 7(1), 162-180. Frith, C. D., Blakemore, S. J., & Wolpert, D. M. (2000). Abnormalities in the awareness and control of action. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 355(1404), 1771–1788. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2000.0734 Gallagher, S. (2012). Multiple aspects in the sense of agency. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(1), 15-31. Gallagher, S., & Trigg, D. (2016). Agency and Anxiety: Delusions of Control and Loss of Control in Schizophrenia and Agoraphobia. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00459 Gentsch, A., & Synofzik, M. (2014). Affective coding: the emotional dimension of agency. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 608. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00608 Goodman, S. H., Simon, H., McCarthy, L., Ziegler, J., & Ceballos, A. (2022). Testing models of associations between depression and parenting self-efficacy in mothers: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 25(3), 471–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-022-00398-0 Google. (2024). Gemini 2.0 Flash (November 01 version) [Large language model]. https://gemini.google.com Gorlin, E. I., & Bekes, V. (2021). Agency via awareness: A unifying meta-process in psychotherapy. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 698655. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.698655 Haggard, P., Clark, S., & Kalogeras, J. (2002). Voluntary action and conscious awareness. National Neuroscience, 5(4), 382-385. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn827 Haggard, P., Martin, F., Taylor-Clarke, M., Jeannerod, M., & Franck, N. (2003). Awareness of action in schizophrenia.Neuroreport, 14(7), 1081-1085. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wnr.0000073684.00308.c0 Harrington, D. (2009). Confirmatory Factor Analysis (Pocket Guides to Social Work Research Methods). New York: Oxford University Press. Hitlin, S., & Elder, G. H. (2007). Time, Self, and the Curiously Abstract Concept of Agency. Sociological Theory, 25(2), 170-191. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 JASP Team. (2024). JASP (Version 0.19.1) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://jasp-stats.org/ Joormann, J., & Stanton, C. H. (2016). Examining emotion regulation in depression: A review and future directions. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 86, 35–49.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.07.007 Khalsa, S. S., Adolphs, R., Cameron, O. G., Critchley, H. D., Davenport, P. W.,Feinstein, J. S., . . . Zucker, N. (2018). Interoception and Mental Health: A Roadmap. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, 3(6), 501-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2017.12.004 Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York: The Guilford Press. Kranick, S. M., Moore, J. W., Yusuf, N., Martinez, V. T., LaFaver, K., Edwards, M. J., . . . Voon, V. (2013). Action-effect binding is decreased in motor conversion disorder: implications for sense of agency. Movement Disorders, 28(8), 1110- 1116. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.25408 Koreki, A., Goeta, D., Ricciardi, L., Eilon, T., Chen, J., Critchley, H. D., Garfinkel, S. N., Edwards, M., & Yogarajah, M. (2022). The relationship between interoception and agency and its modulation by heartbeats: an exploratory study. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 13624. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16569-6 Koyuncu, I., & KILIÇ, A. (2019). The use of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses: A document analysis. Egitim Ve Bilim-Education and Science,44(198). Levenson, R. W. (2014). The autonomic nervous system and emotion. Emotion Review, 6(2), 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073913512003 Li, C.-H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 936–949. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7 Lynn, M. T., Muhle-Karbe, P. S., Aarts, H., & Brass, M. (2014). Priming determinist beliefs diminishes implicit (but not explicit) components of self-agency.Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1483. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01483 Maddux, J. E., & Meier, L. J. (1995). Self-efficacy and depression. In J. E. Maddux(Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application (pp. 143–169). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6868- 5_5 Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. McNeish, D. (2018). Thanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here. Psychological Methods, 23(3), 412–433. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000144 Moore, J. W. (2016). What is the sense of agency and why does it matter? Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1272. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01272 Moore, J. W., & Fletcher, P. C. (2012). Sense of agency in health and disease: a review of cue integration approaches. Conscious Cognition, 21(1), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.08.010 Muris, P. (2002). Relationships between self-efficacy and symptoms of anxiety disorders and depression in a normal adolescent sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 32(2), 337–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191- 8869(01)00027-7 Musculus, L., Tünte, M. R., Raab, M., & Kayhan, E. (2021). An embodied cognition perspective on the role of interoception in the development of the minimal self. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 716950. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.716950 Oren, E., Eitam, B., & Dar, R. (2019). Intentional binding and obsessive-compulsive tendencies: A dissociation between indirect and direct measures of the sense of agency. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 20, 59-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocrd.2017.11.002 Peng, Z. W., Yang, W. H., Miao, G. D., Jing, J., & Chan, C. K. (2011). The Chinese version of the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised scale: Replication and extension to non-clinical and clinical individuals with OCD symptoms. BMC Psychiatry, 11(1), 1-6. OpenAI. (2024). ChatGPT 4o (November 01 version) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com Ratcliffe, M. (2013). Depression and the phenomenology of free will. The oxford handbook of philosophy and psychiatry, 574-591. Renes, R. A., & Aarts, H. (2017). The sense of agency in health and well-being: Understanding the role of the minimal self in action-control. In Routledge International Handbook of Self-Control in Health and Well-Being (pp. 193-205). Routledge. Roos, J. M., & Bauldry, S. (2021). Confirmatory factor analysis. Sage Publications. Schwarzer, R., Bäßler, J., Patricia K., & Schröder, K. (1997). The Assessment of Optimistic Self-beliefs: Comparison of the German, Spanish, and Chinese Versions of the General Self-efficacy Scale. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46(1), 69-88. Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35-37). Windsor, UK: NFER- NELSON. Shafie Kahani T, Hasani J, Shakeri M. (2021). The role of self-efficacy, resilience and cognitive emotion regulation in predicting obsessive-compulsive symptoms in the general population. Journal of Psychological Science. 20(107), 2095-2106. doi:10.52547/JPS.20.107.2095 Sherer, M., Maddux, J. E., Mercadante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R. W. (1982). The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation. Psychological Reports, 51(2), 663–671. Soral, W., Kofta, M., & Bukowski, M. (2020). Helplessness experience and intentional (un-)binding: Control deprivation disrupts the implicit sense of agency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000791 Svenaeus, F. (2001). The hermeneutics of medicine and the phenomenology of health: Steps towards a philosophy of medical practice. Springer. Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53-55. doi:10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd Tapal, A., Oren, E., Dar, R., & Eitam, B. (2017). The sense of agency scale: A measure of consciously perceived control over one's mind, body, and the immediate environment. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1552. Teng, S. C., & Lien, Y. W. (2016). What Confucius practiced is good for your mind:Examining the effect of a contemplative practice in Confucian tradition on executive functions. Consciousness and Cognition, 42, 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2016.03.016 van der Kolk, B. (2014). The body keeps the score: Mind, brain and body in the transformation of trauma. penguin UK. Viladrich, C., Angulo-Brunet, A., & Doval, E. (2017). A journey around alpha and omega to estimate internal consistency reliability. Anales de Psicología, 33(3), 755–782. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.33.3.268401 Vogel, D. H. V., Jording, M., Weiss, P. H., & Vogeley, K. (2024). Temporal binding and sense of agency in major depression. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 15, 1288674. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1288674 Voderholzer U, Hilbert S, Fischer A, Neumüller J, Schwartz C, Hessler-Kaufmann JB. Frequency and level of self-efficacy predict the effectiveness of therapist- and self-guided exposure in obsessive compulsive disorder. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy. 2020;48(6):751-755. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465820000582 Voss, M., Moore, J., Hauser, M., Gallinat, J., Heinz, A., & Haggard, P. (2010). Altered awareness of action in schizophrenia: a specific deficit in predicting action consequences. Brain, 133(10), 3104-3112. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awq152 Wegner, D. M., & Wheatley, T. (1999). Apparent mental causation: Sources of the experience of will. American Psychologist, 54(7), 480–492. Williams, B., Onsman, A., & Brown, T. (2010). Exploratory factor analysis: A five- step guide for novices. Journal of Emergency Primary Health Care, 8(3), 1-13. Williams, S. L. (1995). Self-efficacy, anxiety, and phobic disorders. In J. E. Maddux(Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application (pp. 69–107). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6868- 5_3 Yamaguchi, S., Shiozawa, T., Matsunaga, A., Bernick, P., Sawada, U., Taneda, A., Osumi, T., & Fujii, C. (2020). Development and psychometric properties of a new brief scale for subjective personal agency (SPA-5) in people with schizophrenia. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 29, e111.https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796020000437 Zhang, J. X., & Schwarzer, R. (1995). Measuring optimistic self-beliefs: A Chinese adaptation of the General Self-Efficacy Scale. Psychologia, 38 (3), 174-181. Ziss, M. (2020). Pre-trauma growth under terror threat: Suggestive communication method in anticipatory trauma. International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis, 68(4), 475-482. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97743 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 能動感（Sense of agency）是指個體主觀判斷自身行動或其結果符合意圖的程度，是自我（self）的核心面向之一，與多種心理疾患如思覺失調、憂鬱、強迫症等有關，被視為心理健康的重要指標。能動感也被認為是一種具身性（embodied）的感受，不僅與身體動作控制有關，對內在身心狀態的調節經驗也被視為最早的能動感形式之一，心理疾患亦常展現此面向的調控困難。然而，現有理論與測量多著重對外目標達成與行動控制，現有的客觀測量與量表亦分別存在構念爭議、適用對象有限及文化適配性不足等問題。因此，在這篇論文中，我主張能動感的概念除了過去標舉的來自「目標導向行動」的能動感」外，也應該涵蓋來自「內在狀態調節」的能動感，並據此構念發展一個具文化考量的一般性能動感測量工具—雙向度能動感量表。量表編製以254位年輕成人樣本進行探索性因素分析與項目分析，再以545位樣本進行驗證性因素分析及信效度檢驗。結果支持雙向度能動感量表的二因子結構，模型適配度達可接受程度以上，內部一致性信度（ω = .79）與再測信度（r = .84）良好。本量表與既有能動感、自我效能及心理疾患傾向（憂鬱、焦慮與強迫傾向）呈顯著且符合預期方向之相關，顯示良好校標關聯效度。階層多元回歸分析顯示，相較於國外常用的能動感與自我效能量表，雙向度能動感量表在預測前述三種心理疾患傾向上可提供額外解釋力，具增益效度。本量表也首度顯示這三種心理疾患傾向與能動感這兩種面向的關係有所不同。整體而言，本論文拓展對能動感具身性內涵的理解，在能動感的理論建構上有所創新，亦提供心理健康研究新視角的測量工具，具應用潛力。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The sense of agency (SoA) refers to an individual's subjective judgment regarding the extent to which their actions and outcomes align with their intentions. As a core aspect of the self and a crucial indicator of mental health, SoA has demonstrated associations to various psychological disorders, including schizophrenia, depression, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. SoA is also considered an embodied experience, with bodily experiences involving the basic needs and homeostasis of internal states proposed as one of its earliest forms. Furthermore, the dysregulation of internal states is commonly observed in psychopathology. However, extant theories and measurements primarily focus on goal-directed action control, leading to limitations such as conceptual ambiguity, restricted applicability across populations, and inadequate cultural adaptation. To address these issues, I proposed a bidimensional framework of SoA that encompasses the regulating internal states in addition to goal-directed actions. Based on this framework, this study developed a bidimensional SoA scale, designed to be comprehensive, culturally sensitive, and suitable for both non-clinical and clinical populations. In Study 1, an exploratory factor analysis and an item analysis were conducted with 254 young adults. In Study 2, then utilized a separate sample of 545 participants to conduct a confirmatory factor analysis, along with reliability and validity testing. Study 2 Results consistently supported the two-factor structure, demonstrating with acceptable model fit, high internal consistency (ω = .79), and good test–retest reliability (r = .84). As anticipated, the scale significantly correlated with existing measures of SoA and self-efficacy, as well as with depression, anxiety, and obsessive–compulsion tendencies, indicating strong criterion-related validity. Furthermore, hierarchical multiple regression analyses revealed that the Bidimensional Sense of Agency Scale offered additional explanatory power in predicting psychological symptoms compared to widely used measures of SoA and self-efficacy, thus demonstrating incremental validity. Notably, this study was also the first to show that various psychopathological tendencies exhibit distinct profiles across these two dimensions of agency. In sum, this research advances our understanding of embodied agency, presenting a novel theoretical framework and a new measurement tool with practical implications for mental health research. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-07-16T16:07:37Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-07-16T16:07:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 論文口試委員會審定書 i
誌謝 iii 摘要 v Abstract vi 目次 ix 圖次 xi 表次 xiii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 能動感的定義及特徵 2 第二節 現有能動感測量工具之侷限 9 第三節 拓展能動感具身性內涵：對個體內環境的調節經驗 17 第四節 雙向度能動感量表之理論架構及編製研究設計 20 第二章 撰題及內容效度檢驗 25 第一節 方法 25 第二節 結果與討論 26 第三章 探索性因素分析與項目分析 29 第一節 方法 29 第二節 結果與討論 31 第四章 驗證性因素分析與信效度檢驗 45 第一節 方法 46 第二節 結果 52 第五章 綜合討論 65 第一節 雙向度能動感量表在理論與實務上的貢獻 66 第二節 限制與未來研究方向 70 參考文獻 72 附錄一 網路施測版面範例 84 附錄二 雙向度能動感量表 85 附錄三 能動感量表中文版（本論文依據 Tapal et al., 2017 翻譯） 86 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 自我調節 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 能動感 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 能動性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 自我效能 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 具身性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | embodiment | en |
| dc.subject | self-regulation | en |
| dc.subject | self-efficacy | en |
| dc.subject | sense of agency | en |
| dc.subject | agency | en |
| dc.title | 從行動到身心狀態的掌控： 雙向度能動感的構念提出與量表編製 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | From Intent-Action Congruence to Internal Regulation Congruence: Conceptualizing and Developing a Bidimensional Sense of Agency Scale | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 林耀盛 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | Yaw-Sheng Lin | en |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張仁和;黃柏僩 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Jen-Ho Chang;Po-Hsien Huang | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 能動感,能動性,具身性,自我調節,自我效能, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | sense of agency,agency,embodiment,self-regulation,self-efficacy, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 86 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202501620 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-07-11 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2025-07-17 | - |
| Appears in Collections: | 心理學系 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf | 1.96 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.