請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97672完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 朱玉芳 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Yu-Fang Chu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 楊子賢 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Tzu-Hsien Yang | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-11T16:06:47Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-07-12 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-07-11 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-07-02 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Bao, Y., & Datta, A. (2014). Simultaneously discovering and quantifying risk types from textual risk disclosures. Management Science, 60(6), 1371–1391. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1930
Beatty, A., Cheng, L., & Zhang, H. (2019). Are risk factor disclosures still relevant? Evidence from market reactions to risk factor disclosures before and after the financial crisis. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(2), 805–838. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12444 Campbell, J. L., Chen, H., Dhaliwal, D. S., Lu, H., & Steele, L. B. (2014). The information content of mandatory risk factor disclosures in corporate filings. Review of Accounting Studies, 19(1), 396–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-013-9258-3 Cazier, R. A., McMullin, J. L., & Treu, J. S. (2021). Are lengthy and boilerplate risk factor disclosures inadequate? An examination of judicial and regulatory assessments of risk factor language. The Accounting Review, 96(4), 131–155. https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-2018-0657 Chu, Y. F. (2023). SPACs and risk factor disclosures (Doctoral dissertation). The University of Texas at Dallas. Dimitrova, L. (2017). Perverse incentives of special purpose acquisition companies, the “poor man’s private equity funds”. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 63(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2016.10.003 Gaulin, M. (2017). Risk factor fiction: The information content of risk factor disclosures (Doctoral dissertation). Rice University. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. Gahng, M., Ritter, J. R., & Zhang, D. (2023). SPACs. The Review of Financial Studies, 36(9), 3463–3501. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhad019 Hope, O.-K., Hu, D., & Lu, H. (2016). The benefits of specific risk-factor disclosures. Review of Accounting Studies, 21(4), 1005–1045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-016-9371-1 Kiesel, F., Klingelhöfer, N., Schiereck, D., & Vismara, S. (2023). SPAC merger announcement returns and subsequent performance. European Financial Management, 29(2), 399–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12366 Klausner, M., Ohlrogge, M., & Ruan, E. (2022). A sober look at SPACs. Yale Journal on Regulation, 39(1), 228–303. https://www.yalejreg.com/print/a-sober-look-at-spacs/ Kothari, S. P., Li, X., & Short, J. E. (2009). The effect of disclosures by management, analysts, and business press on cost of capital, return volatility, and analyst forecasts: A study using content analysis. The Accounting Review, 84(5), 1639–1670. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.5.1639 Kolb, J., & Tykvová, T. (2016). Going public via special purpose acquisition companies: Frogs do not turn into princes. Journal of Corporate Finance, 40, 80–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.07.006 Kravet, T., & Muslu, V. (2013). Textual risk disclosures and investors’ risk perceptions. Review of Accounting Studies, 18(4), 1088–1122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-013-9228-9 Li, F. (2006). Do stock market investors understand the risk sentiment of corporate annual reports? Working paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.898181 Loughran, T., & McDonald, B. (2013). IPO first-day returns, offer price revisions, volatility, and Form S-1 language. Journal of Financial Economics, 109(2), 307–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.02.017 Pawliczek, A., Skinner, A.N., & Zechman, S.L.C. (2024). Signing blank checks: The roles of disclosure and reputation in the face of limited information. The Accounting Review, 99(2), 395–419. https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-2021-0631 Ritter, J. R. (1991). The long-run performance of initial public offerings. The Journal of Finance, 46(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb03743.x Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 2016. Business and Financial Disclosure Required by Regulation S-K. Release No. 33 10064; 34-77599; File No. S7-06-16: 1–341. https://www.sec.gov/rules/concept/2016/33-10064.pdf Wen, Y., & Zhu, M. (2022). Is going public via SPAC regulatory arbitrage? A textual analysis approach. Working paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4066641 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97672 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 隨特殊目的收購公司(SPAC)近年興起,現有文獻多聚焦於 SPAC 架構設計等議題,對風險因子揭露的資訊價值及其對合併後股價報酬影響缺乏探討。因此,本研究以2016 至2023 年間美國完成合併的 503 件SPAC 為樣本,運用文本分析量化股東會委託書風險因子揭露程度,檢視其對合併後市場反應的影響。市場反應指標為合併完成後目標公司一年之買進持有異常報酬和報酬波動率,以衡量風險因子揭露對市場長期股價表現與波動程度之影響。
實證結果顯示,風險因子揭露程度愈高,SPAC合併後一年買進持有異常報酬顯著偏低,顯示揭露內容具有資訊價值,投資人在接收到風險資訊後調整預期,進而影響股價表現。此外,風險因子揭露程度與報酬波動率呈顯著正相關,反市市場對風險資訊的解讀分歧擴大,進而提升合併後公司股價之波動幅度。 綜合而言,本研究發現SPAC股東會委託書中的風險因子揭露具有資訊價值,與合併後市場反應存在一定關聯,為投資人評估公司價值與風險提供參考。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | With the recent rise of Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs), existing literature has largely focused on structural design aspects. The informativeness of risk factor disclosures in proxy statements and their impact on post-merger stock performance remains underexplored. This study investigates the relation between risk factor disclosures in SPACs’ proxy statements and the stock performance over post-merger periods, using a sample of 503 SPACs that completed mergers in the United States between 2016 and 2023. I employ textual analysis to quantify the extent of risk factor disclosure and examine its influence on market reactions, measured by the one-year buy-and-hold abnormal return (BHAR) and return volatility (RETVOL) of the post-merger target company, capturing the long-term stock return and price volatility associated with risk factor disclosures.
Empirical results show that higher levels of risk factor disclosure are significantly associated with lower BHAR in the year following the merger, indicating that risk factor disclosures are informative, as investors adjust their expectations in response to the disclosed information, which is subsequently incorporated into stock returns. Additionally, risk factor disclosure is positively related with RETVOL, suggesting that more extensive disclosure leads to greater investor disagreement and increased price volatility. In conclusion, this study finds that risk factor disclosures in SPACs’ proxy statements possess informational value and are associated with post-merger market reactions, providing valuable insights for investors when evaluating firm value and risk. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-07-11T16:06:47Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-07-11T16:06:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 I
ABSTRACT II 目次 III 表次 v 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 5 第三節 研究架構 6 第二章 文獻探討 8 第一節 SPAC制度架構 8 第二節 風險揭露與市場反應之研究 10 第三節 合併後股價表現之探討 14 第四節 研究假說 16 第三章 研究方法 19 第一節 研究樣本與資料來源 19 第二節 研究設計架構 22 第三節 變數定義 25 第四節 實證模型設計 31 第四章 實證結果分析 33 第一節 敘述性統計與相關性分析 33 第二節 風險因子揭露與買進持有異常報酬 38 第三節 風險因子揭露與報酬波動率 43 第四節 額外測試 47 第五章 結論與建議 55 第一節 研究結論與貢獻 55 第二節 研究限制與未來建議 57 參考文獻 59 附錄 61 CAMPBELL ET AL.(2014)風險關鍵字列表 61 新增風險關鍵字列表 64 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 報酬波動率 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 文本分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 買進持有異常報酬 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 風險因子揭露 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 特殊目的收購公司 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Textual Analysis | en |
| dc.subject | Special Purpose Acquisition Company | en |
| dc.subject | Risk Factor Disclosure | en |
| dc.subject | Buy-and-Hold Abnormal Return | en |
| dc.subject | Return Volatility | en |
| dc.title | 特殊目的收購公司風險因子揭露對合併後市場反應之影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Risk Factor Disclosures in SPACs’ Proxy Statements and Post-Merger Market Reactions | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 廖芝嫻;黄馨儀 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chih-Hsien Liao;Hsin-Yi Huang | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 特殊目的收購公司,風險因子揭露,買進持有異常報酬,報酬波動率,文本分析, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Special Purpose Acquisition Company,Risk Factor Disclosure,Buy-and-Hold Abnormal Return,Return Volatility,Textual Analysis, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 65 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202501456 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-07-03 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2028-07-01 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 會計學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.17 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
