請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97638完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 盧秋玲 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Chiu-Ling Lu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 林家瑜 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Chia-Yu Lin | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-09T16:11:16Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-07-10 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-07-09 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-06-27 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 呂佳玲, & 林基煌. (2008). 家族企業公司治理, 併購策略與績效之探討. 亞太經濟管理評論, 11(2), 107-134。
李卉馨, 詹淑婷, 蘇怡方, & 鍾喜梅. (2014). 專業經理人職位的代理意涵: 台灣電子業家族企業之實證分析. 臺大管理論叢, 25(1), 259-285。 周行一, 陳錦村, & 陳坤宏. (1996). 家族企業, 聯屬持股與公司價值之研究. 中國財務學刊, 4(1), 115-139。 林美鳳, 梁嘉紋, & 金成隆. (2010). 公司股權結構與外資持股關係之研究. 中山管理評論, 18(1), 101-142。 林寶人. (2010). 台灣上市櫃家族企業與公司績效. 會計學報, 3(1), 53-82。 姜義軒(2000),「台灣電子產業與非電子產業Tobin's q之差異及其成因之研究」,國立陽明交通大學經營管理研究所碩士學位論文。 洪琮堡(2004),「以核心能耐為基礎之相關性多角化策略—以華碩電腦公司為例」,國立臺灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士學位論文。 倪衍森與廖容岑(2006),「家族企業負債代理成本及股利政策之研究-以台灣上市公司為例」,國立陽明交通大學經營管理研究所。 曹壽民, 金成隆, & 呂學典. (2011). 股權結構與多角化. 臺大管理論叢, 22(1), 165-198。 莊嘉建, & 呂佩蓉. (2008). 股權結構, 關係人交易與公司財務績效關聯性之研究. 蘭陽學報, (7), 86-94。 陳世明(1998),「多角化策略與Tobin's Q關係之研究」,國立政治大學企業管理學研究所碩士學位論文。 彭茂烽(2018),「台灣上市櫃公司併購績效探討:家族企業與非家族企業之比較」,國立臺北大學會計學研究所碩士學位論文。 黃仲生(1996),「多角化對公司價值影響之實證研究」,國立中山大學財務管理研究所碩士學位論文。 葉銀華. (1999). 家族控股集團, 核心金業與報酬互動之研究-台灣與香港證券市場之比較. 管理評論, 18(2), 59-86。 劉凱禎(2009),「多角化對公司價值之影響以台灣上市公司為例」,國立成功大學財務金融研究所碩士學位論文。 歐陽豪, & 蔣聲雄. (2012). 多角化策略與年報資訊揭露對金融產業公司績效影響-金融控股公司組織型態調節效果之實證研究. 台灣金融財務季刊, 13(3), 1-42。 鄭伶如. (2008). 公司治理, 資本結構與公司價值關係之研究. 文大商管學報, 13(1), 65-91。 戴維芯(1997),「多角化策略型態對公司價值影響之實證研究-以高科技上市公司為例」,國立陽明交通大學科技管理研究所碩士學位論文。 Ali, A., Chen, T. Y., & Radhakrishnan, S. (2007). Corporate disclosures by family firms. Journal of accounting and economics, 44(1-2), 238-286. Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding‐family ownership and firm performance: evidence from the S&P 500. The journal of finance, 58(3), 1301-1328. Banker, R. D., Bardhan, I. R., & Chen, T. Y. (2008). The role of manufacturing practices in mediating the impact of activity-based costing on plant performance. Accounting, organizations and society, 33(1), 1-19. Bera, A. K., & Park, S. Y. (2008). Optimal portfolio diversification using the maximum entropy principle. Econometric Reviews, 27(4-6), 484-512. Berger, P. G., & Ofek, E. (1995). Diversification's effect on firm value. Journal of financial economics, 37(1), 39-65. Bloom, N., & Van Reenen, J. (2007). Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. The quarterly journal of Economics, 122(4), 1351-1408. Brainard, W. C., & Tobin, J. (1968). Pitfalls in financial model building. The American economic review, 58(2), 99-122. Campa, J. M., & Kedia, S. (2002). Explaining the diversification discount. The journal of finance, 57(4), 1731-1762. Chatterjee, S., & Wernerfelt, B. (1991). The link between resources and type of diversification: Theory and evidence. Strategic management journal, 12(1), 33-48. Chen, R., El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., & Wang, H. (2017). Do state and foreign ownership affect investment efficiency? Evidence from privatizations. Journal of Corporate Finance, 42, 408-421. Denis, D. J., Denis, D. K., & Sarin, A. (1997). Ownership structure and top executive turnover. Journal of financial economics, 45(2), 193-221. Denis, D. J., Denis, D. K., & Yost, K. (2002). Global diversification, industrial diversification, and firm value. The journal of Finance, 57(5), 1951-1979. Donnelly, R.G. (1964) The Family Business. Harvard Business Review, 42, 93-105. Ducassy, I., & Prevot, F. (2010). The effects of family dynamics on diversification strategy: Empirical evidence from French companies. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(4), 224-235. Gomez‐Mejia, L. R., Makri, M., & Kintana, M. L. (2010). Diversification decisions in family‐controlled firms. Journal of management studies, 47(2), 223-252. Hernández-Trasobares, A., & Galve-Górriz, C. (2017). Diversification and family control as determinants of performance: A study of listed business groups. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 23(1), 46-54. Hoechle, D., Schmid, M., Walter, I., & Yermack, D. (2012). How much of the diversification discount can be explained by poor corporate governance?. Journal of financial economics, 103(1), 41-60. Hoffman, J., Hoelscher, M., & Sorenson, R. (2006). Achieving sustained competitive advantage: A family capital theory. Family business review, 19(2), 135-145. Jacquemin, A. P., & Berry, C. H. (1979). Entropy measure of diversification and corporate growth. The journal of industrial economics, 27(4), 359-369. Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American economic review, 76(2), 323-329. Lang, L. H., & Stulz, R. M. (1994). Tobin's q, corporate diversification, and firm performance. Journal of political economy, 102(6), 1248-1280. Leuz, C., Lins, K. V., & Warnock, F. E. (2009). Do foreigners invest less in poorly governed firms?. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(8), 3245-3285. Lewellen, W. G. (1971). A pure financial rationale for the conglomerate merger. The journal of Finance, 26(2), 521-537. Lindenberg, E. B., & Ross, S. A. (1981). Tobin's q ratio and industrial organization. Journal of business, 1-32. Markides, C. (1995). Diversification, refocusing, and economic performance. MIT Press. Markides, C. C., & Williamson, P. J. (1994). Related diversification, core competences and corporate performance. Strategic management journal, 15(S2), 149-165. Maury, B. (2006). Family ownership and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Western European corporations. Journal of corporate finance, 12(2), 321-341. Mazur, M., & Zhang, S. (2015). Diversification discount over the long run: New perspectives. Finance Research Letters, 15, 93-98. McVey, H., & Draho, J. (2005). US family‐run companies–they may be better than you think. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 17(4), 134-143. Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2006). Family governance and firm performance: Agency, stewardship, and capabilities. Family business review, 19(1), 73-87. Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., Lester, R. H., & Cannella Jr, A. A. (2007). Are family firms really superior performers?. Journal of corporate finance, 13(5), 829-858. Muñoz-Bullón, F., & Sánchez-Bueno, M. J. (2012). Do family ties shape the performance consequences of diversification? Evidence from the European Union. Journal of World Business, 47(3), 469-477. Palepu, K. (1985). Diversification strategy, profit performance and the entropy measure. Strategic management journal, 6(3), 239-255. Park, K., & Jang, S. S. (2012). Effect of diversification on firm performance: Application of the entropy measure. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(1), 218-228. Rajan, R., Servaes, H., & Zingales, L. (2000). The cost of diversity: The diversification discount and inefficient investment. The journal of Finance, 55(1), 35-80. Riswan, R., & Suyono, E. (2016). Corporate diversification: Destroying or increasing firm value? Empirical evidence from Indonesia. Corporate Ownership & Control. 14 (4). Sennetti, J. T., Chang-Soo, K., & Sellani, R. J. (2004). Measuring the effect of investment in Intellectual Capital. Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 9(2), 82. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The journal of finance, 52(2), 737-783. Temiz, Huseyin and Boumparis, Periklis and Florackis, Chris, ESG Disclosure, Foreign Ownership, and the Role of the Information and Governance Environments (March 18, 2023). Tobin, J. (1969). A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory. Journal of money, credit and banking, 1(1), 15-29. Villalonga, B. (2004). Diversification discount or premium? New evidence from the business information tracking series. The Journal of Finance, 59(2), 479-506. Villalonga, B. (2004). Does diversification cause the" diversification discount"?. Financial Management, 5-27. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic management journal, 5(2), 171-180. Yeh, Y. H., Lee, T. S., & Woidtke, T. (2001). Family control and corporate governance: Evidence from Taiwan. International Review of finance, 2(1‐2), 21-48. Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of financial economics, 40(2), 185-211. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97638 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究以2010年至2023年間之臺灣上市櫃公司為樣本,探討企業多角化程度、家族企業與否及兩者交互作用對公司價值與外資持股比率之影響,並進一步區分電子業與非電子業進行比較。整體實證結果發現,多角化程度對公司價值及外資持股呈現正向關聯,支持「多角化溢價」之觀點,顯示企業透過多角化可達到資源共享與分散風險的目的,進而提升競爭力與投資吸引力。然而產業差異分析指出,電子業中多角化對公司價值及外資持股具有正向顯著影響,非電子業則可能因異質性高與核心競爭力不足,呈現負向效果。
家族企業部分,實證結果顯示家族企業與公司價值整體呈正向顯著關聯,支持家族資本優勢的觀點;進一步區分產業後發現,電子業中家族企業對公司價值的影響同樣為正向,顯示家族企業的特性可能有助於保護技術以鞏固競爭優勢,而非電子業則可能因保守管理風格而限制其成長,呈現負向效果。至於外資持股部分,無論整體樣本或是區分產業,家族企業對外資持股皆呈負向影響,顯示外資普遍對其封閉式治理與高度集中控制抱持疑慮。 此外,在交互作用的分析顯示,當企業同時具備家族控制與高度多角化特性時,對公司價值與外資投資意願皆產生顯著負面影響,顯示家族企業在多角化過程中可能因管理資源有限或是面臨控制權衝突而削弱整體表現。綜合以上,本研究能反映近年臺灣與外國企業對多角化及家族企業經營特徵之態度,對企業未來擬定策略時具有參考價值。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study uses a sample of Taiwan’s listed companies between 2010 and 2023 to examine the effects of diversification, family business status, and their interaction on firm value and foreign ownership, further comparing outcomes between the electronic industry and non-electronic industries. The overall empirical results reveal that diversification shows a positive relationship with both firm value and foreign ownership, supporting the “diversification premium” perspective, indicating that diversification enables firms to achieve resource sharing and risk diversification, thereby enhancing competitiveness and investment attractiveness. Furthermore, industry-specific analysis reveals that in the electronic industry, diversification has a significant positive impact on firm value and foreign ownership, whereas in non-electronic industries, the effect is negative, possibly due to higher heterogeneity and weaker core competitiveness.
Regarding family businesses, the results show an overall significant positive relationship with firm value, supporting the family capital advantage perspective. When further divided by industry, family businesses in the electronic industry still show a positive impact on firm value, possibly because their characteristics help protect technology and strengthen competitive advantages, whereas in non-electronic industries, their conservative management style may limit growth, leading to negative effects. As for foreign ownership, across the full sample and by industry, family businesses show a negative relationship with foreign shareholding, indicating that foreign investors generally have concerns about the closed governance and highly concentrated control typical of family businesses. Additionally, the interaction analysis shows that when a firm combines both family control and high diversification, there is a significant negative impact on both firm value and foreign investment willingness, suggesting that family businesses may face limited management resources or control conflicts during diversification, weakening overall performance. In summary, this study reflects the attitudes of Taiwanese and foreign investors toward diversification and family business characteristics in recent years and offers valuable insights for companies in formulating future strategies. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-07-09T16:11:16Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-07-09T16:11:16Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
摘要 ii ABSTRACT iii 目次 v 表次 vi 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與架構 3 第二章 文獻回顧與假說建立 4 第三章 樣本選取與研究方法 9 第一節 樣本來源 9 第二節 變數衡量 11 第三節 研究方法與實證模型 18 第四章 實證結果分析 20 第一節 敘述性統計 20 第二節 主要變數的相關性分析 23 第三節 多角化與家族企業對公司價值之迴歸結果 28 第四節 多角化與家族企業對外資持股比率之迴歸結果 34 第五章 結論與建議 39 第一節 研究結論與貢獻 39 第二節 研究限制與建議 41 中文參考文獻 42 英文參考文獻 44 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 多角化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 電子業非電子業 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 外資持股 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 公司價值 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 家族企業 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Electronic Industry | en |
| dc.subject | Foreign Ownership | en |
| dc.subject | Firm Value | en |
| dc.subject | Family Business | en |
| dc.subject | Diversification | en |
| dc.subject | Non-Electronic Industry | en |
| dc.title | 多角化與家族企業對公司價值及外資持股之影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Impact of Diversification and Family Business on Firm Value and Foreign Ownership | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 何耕宇;賴慧文 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Keng-Yu Ho;Whuei-Wen Lai | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 多角化,家族企業,公司價值,外資持股,電子業非電子業, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Diversification,Family Business,Firm Value,Foreign Ownership,Electronic Industry,Non-Electronic Industry, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 47 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202501344 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-06-30 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | N/A | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 國際企業學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.11 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
