請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97631完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 黃景沂 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Ching-I Huang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 湯子龍 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Tzu-Lung Tang | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-09T16:09:15Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-07-10 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-07-09 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-07-01 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 顧瑩華、高君逸(2020)。臺灣在東協市場的競爭力分析。經濟前瞻,(191),108-116。
Ahearne, A. G., Fernald, J. G., Loungani, P., & Schindler, J. W. (2006). Flying geese or sittingducks: China's impact on the trading fortunes of other Asian economies. FRB International Finance Discussion Paper, (887). Aitken, N. D. (1973). The effect of the EEC and EFTA on European trade: A temporal cross- section analysis. The American Economic Review, 63(5), 881-892. Baier, S. L., & Bergstrand, J. H. (2007). Do free trade agreements actually increase members' international trade?. Journal of international Economics, 71(1), 72-95. Baier, S. L., Yotov, Y. V., & Zylkin, T. (2019). On the widely differing effects of free trade agreements: Lessons from twenty years of trade integration. Journal of International Economics, 116, 206-226. Bernard, A. B., Jensen, J. B., Redding, S. J., & Schott, P. K. (2009). The margins of US trade. American Economic Review, 99(2), 487-493. Carrere, C. (2006). Revisiting the effects of regional trade agreements on trade flows with proper specification of the gravity model. European economic review, 50(2), 223-247. Chaney, T. (2008). Distorted gravity: the intensive and extensive margins of international trade. American economic review, 98(4), 1707-1721. Christodoulopoulou, S. (2010). The Effects of Multilateral Trade Liberalization on the Extensive and the Intensive Margins of Trade. Dutt, P., Mihov, I., & Van Zandt, T. (2013). The effect of WTO on the extensive and the intensive margins of trade. Journal of international Economics, 91(2), 204-219. Foster, N., Poeschl, J., & Stehrer, R. (2011). The impact of preferential trade agreements on the margins of international trade. Economic Systems, 35(1), 84-97. Fugazza, M., & Nicita, A. (2013). The direct and relative effects of preferential market access. Journal of International Economics, 89(2), 357-368. Guilhot, L. (2010). Assessing the impact of the main East-Asian free trade agreements using a gravity model. First results. Economics Bulletin, 30(1), 282-291. Hummels, D., & Klenow, P. J. (2005). The variety and quality of a nation's exports. American economic review, 95(3), 704-723. Kawai, M., & Wignaraja, G. (2011). Asian FTAs: Trends, prospects and challenges. Journal of Asian Economics, 22(1), 1-22. MacPhee, C. R., & Sattayanuwat, W. (2014). Consequence of regional trade agreements to developing countries. Journal of Economic Integration, 64-94. Magee, C. S. (2008). New measures of trade creation and trade diversion. Journal of International Economics, 75(2), 349-362. Mátyás, L. (1997). Proper econometric specification of the gravity model. The world economy, 20(3), 363-368. Melitz, M. J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra‐industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. econometrica, 71(6), 1695-1725. Silva, J. S., & Tenreyro, S. (2006). The log of gravity. The Review of Economics and statistics, 641-658. Sun, L., & Reed, M. R. (2010). Impacts of free trade agreements on agricultural trade creation and trade diversion. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 92(5), 1351-1363. Taguchi, H. (2015). Trade creation and diversion effects of ASEAN-plus-one free trade agreements. Economics Bulletin, 35(3), 1856-1866. Thu, N. A., & Van Trung, V. (2015). Assessing the Impact of ASEAN+ 3 Free Trade Agreements on ASEAN's Trade Flows: A Gravity Model Approach. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(6), 394. Tinbergen, J. (1962). An analysis of world trade flows. Shaping the world economy, 3, 1-117. Viner, J. (1950). The Customs Union Issue. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Vebiyanto, S., & Atmanti, H. D. (2023). Impact of ASEAN Plus Five Free Trade Area: Trade Creation and Trade Diversion. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 20(2), 145-158. Yang, S., & Martinez-Zarzoso, I. (2014). A panel data analysis of trade creation and trade diversion effects: The case of ASEAN–China Free Trade Area. China Economic Review, 29, 138-151. Zhang, X., Zhou, Y., Geng, X., & Tian, X. (2017). The intensive and extensive margins of China's agricultural trade. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, 65(3), 431-451. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97631 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究透過引力模型,分析東協-中國FTA、東協-日本FTA、東協-韓國FTA三個東協加一FTA的貿易創造及貿易移轉效果,以及貿易協定間貿易效果的異質性。本研究使用2000年至2020年東協十國、中國、日本、韓國以及東協前17大貿易夥伴國家,分別對所有其他國家的貿易面板資料,並於模型中加入年份固定效果(year fixed effect)、國家雙邊固定效果(country-year fixed effect),控制因遺漏變數偏誤產生的內生性問題,估計上,使用卜瓦松偽最大似然估計(Poisson pseudo-maximum-likelihood, PPML)方法估計非線性模型,處理過往文獻中對數線性模型所存在誤差項異質變異的問題,以獲得不偏及一致的估計結果。
針對貿易效果異質性的探討,本研究除了將總貿易值拆分為擴展邊際及集約邊際的二元邊際外,也於模型中加入貿易效果與高所得國家的交乘項、動態逐年效果,更進一步分成不同產業,剖析東協加一FTA的效果異質性。實證結果發現整體上東協-中國FTA產生最大的純貿易創造效果,東協-韓國FTA效果其次,而東協-日本FTA則是對成員國的貿易造成負面影響,且三個東協加一FTA皆不存在貿易移轉的情形。此外,結果也顯示各東協加一FTA的貿易效果確實存在於二元邊際、貿易對象所得水準及逐年動態的異質性。本研究的發現將使政府機構對於東協加一FTA相關貿易政策的成效,有更完整的評估。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study employs a gravity model to analyze the trade creation and trade diversion effects of three ASEAN+1 FTAs: ACFTA, AJCEP, AKFTA, as well as the heterogeneity of trade effects among these agreements. Using panel trade data from 2000 to 2020, the study covers bilateral trade between the ten ASEAN countries, China, Japan, Korea, and ASEAN’s 17 largest trading partners with all other countries. The model includes year fixed effects and country-pair fixed effects to address endogeneity caused by omitted variable bias. For estimation, the study applies the Poisson pseudo-maximum-likelihood (PPML) method to account for heteroskedasticity issues.
To explore the heterogeneity of trade effects, the study decomposes total trade value into intensive and extensive margins, incorporates interaction terms between trade effects and high-income countries, includes yea dynamic effects, and further differentiates by industry to analyze sectoral variations in the impact of ASEAN+1 FTAs. The empirical results show that the ACFTA has generated the largest pure trade creation effect, followed by the AKFTA, while the AJCEP has had a negative effect on trade among its members. Additionally, no evidence of trade diversion is found for any of the three FTAs. The findings also confirm that the trade effects of ASEAN+1 FTAs vary significantly across margins, income levels of trade partners, and over time. These insights provide a more comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness of ASEAN+1 FTA-related trade policies for policymakers. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-07-09T16:09:15Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-07-09T16:09:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… i
英文摘要…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ii 目次…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… iii 圖次………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. v 表次……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. vi 第一章 簡介和文獻回顧……………………………………………………………………………………… 1 第二章 東協加一FTA之背景………………………………………………………………………………… 9 2.1東協區域整合與東協加三………………………………………………………………… 9 2.2東協-中國FTA……………………………………………………………………………………… 10 2.3東協-日本FTA……………………………………………………………………………………… 12 2.4東協-韓國FTA……………………………………………………………………………………… 13 第三章 研究方法與模型設定…………………………………………………………………………… 15 3.1標準引力模型……………………………………………………………………………………… 15 3.2貿易創造及貿易移轉模型……………………………………………………………… 16 3.3集約邊際及擴展邊際……………………………………………………………………… 17 3.4貿易創造、貿易移轉逐年動態效果………………………………………… 18 3.5高所得國家交乘項…………………………………………………………………………… 19 3.6 PPML…….…………………………………………………………………………………………… 20 第四章 實證結果與討論…………………………………………………………………………………… 22 4.1使用資料……………………………………………………………………………………………… 22 4.2引力模型及固定模型效果…………………………………………………………… 22 4.3集約邊際及擴展邊際……………………………………………………………………… 30 4.4貿易效果&高所得交乘項……………………………………………………………… 39 4.5貿易動態逐年效果…………………………………………………………………………… 46 4.6各產業效果………………………………………………………………………………………… 53 第五章 結論……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 56 參考文獻……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 58 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 貿易創造和貿易移轉 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 集約邊際和擴展邊際 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 卜瓦松偽最大似然估計 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 東協加一FTA | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 引力模型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Intensive margin and Extensive margin | en |
| dc.subject | Gravity Model | en |
| dc.subject | ASEAN+1 FTA | en |
| dc.subject | Poisson Pseudo Maximum Likelihood | en |
| dc.title | 東協加一FTA的貿易創造和貿易移轉及其異質性探討 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Trade Creation, Trade Diversion, and Heterogeneity Effects of ASEAN+1 FTAs | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 江淳芳;李浩仲 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chun-Fang Chiang;Hao-Chung Li | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 引力模型,東協加一FTA,卜瓦松偽最大似然估計,貿易創造和貿易移轉,集約邊際和擴展邊際, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Gravity Model,ASEAN+1 FTA,Poisson Pseudo Maximum Likelihood,Intensive margin and Extensive margin, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 59 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202501421 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-07-02 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 經濟學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2030-07-01 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 經濟學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf 此日期後於網路公開 2030-07-01 | 1.67 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
