請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97524完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 姜堯民 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Yao-Min Chiang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳盈臻 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Ying-Chen Chen | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-02T16:17:34Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-07-03 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-07-02 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-06-25 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2002). Market timing and capital structure. Journal of Finance, 57(1), 1–32.
2. Brennan, M. J., & Kraus, A. (1987). Efficient financing under asymmetric information. The Journal of Finance, 42(5), 1225–1243. 3. Bulan, L. T., & Yan, Z. (2010). Firm maturity and the pecking order theory. International Review of Economics & Finance, 19(2), 203–213. 4. Cassar, G., & Holmes, S. (2003). Capital structure and financing of SMEs: Australian evidence. Accounting & Finance, 43(2), 123–147. 5. Chan, K., & Chen, D. H. (2017). Convertible bond offerings and market timing: Evidence from Taiwan. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 24(1), 1–23. 6. Chen, D. H. (2013). Market timing and pecking order theory: Evidence from Taiwan’s equity markets. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 20(1), 123–145. 7. Dong, M., Hirshleifer, D., Richardson, S., & Teoh, S. H. (2017). Why do firms issue convertible bonds? Evidence from the field. Critical Finance Review, 7(1), 111–164. 8. Dutordoir, M., Lewis, C. M., & Seward, J. K. (2014). Convertible securities: A survey of theoretical and empirical issues. Journal of Corporate Finance, 24, 1–20. 9. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2005). Financing decisions: Who issues stock? Journal of Financial Economics, 76(3), 549–582. 10. Frank, M. Z., & Goyal, V. K. (2003). Testing the pecking order theory of capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 67(2), 217–248. 11. Green, R. C. (1984). Investment incentives, debt, and warrants. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(1), 115–136. 12. Kang, J., & Stulz, R. M. (1996). How different is Japanese corporate finance? An investigation of the information content of new security issues. Review of Financial Studies, 9(1), 109–139. 13. Lewis, C. M., Rogalski, R. J., & Seward, J. K. (2003). Industry conditions, growth opportunities and market reactions to convertible debt financing decisions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 27(1), 153–181. 14. Lin, T. C., Lee, Y. T., & Liu, Y. J. (2016). Convertible bonds in Taiwan: An empirical analysis. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 23(3), 195–213. 15. Mayers, D. (1998). Why firms issue convertible bonds: The matching of financial and real investment options. Journal of Financial Economics, 47(1), 83–102. 16. Mikkelson, W. H., & Partch, M. M. (1986). Valuation effects of security offerings and the issuance process. Journal of Financial Economics, 15(1–2), 31–60. 17. Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187–221. 18. Shyam-Sunder, L., & Myers, S. C. (1999). Testing static tradeoff against pecking order models of capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 51(2), 219–244. 19. Stein, J. C. (1992). Convertible bonds as backdoor equity financing. Journal of Financial Economics, 32(1), 3–21. 20. Yu, C., & Tseng, C. Y. (2013). Announcement effects of convertible bond issues in Taiwan: New evidence from 2002 to 2010. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 42(5), 687–714. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97524 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 新冠疫情對全球經濟與金融市場帶來深遠影響,亦顯著改變台灣企業的融資選擇。本文以 2015 至 2024 年台灣上市櫃企業為研究對象,探討企業在疫情前(2015–2019 年)、疫情期間(2020–2022 年)與疫情後(2023–2024 年)三個階段發行可轉債之行為變化及其驅動因素。實證結果顯示:疫情期間市場波動顯著上升,企業為因應資訊不對稱與融資不確定性,傾向以可轉債作為兼顧債務安全與股權彈性的折衷工具,導致發行件數與金額皆大幅上升。
進入疫情後階段,儘管市場不確定性相對降低,企業資本支出與成長需求回升,促使發行動機由「風險管理」轉向「成長布局」,帶動發行規模持續擴大,年平均發行件數自疫情前之 70 件,上升至疫情期間之 100 件,並進一步在疫情後達 116 件。迴歸分析亦顯示,企業之成長性、財務槓桿及所處疫情階段,均為影響可轉債發行的重要因素。 本研究結果支持融資順位理論與後門股權理論,並部分符合市場時機理論之預測,說明企業將可轉債作為在不同總體環境下調整融資策略的關鍵工具。本文不僅補足疫情背景下台灣可轉債發行實證研究的空缺,亦可作為企業財務決策與政策制定的參考依據。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The COVID-19 pandemic had a profound impact on the global economy and financial markets, significantly altering corporate financing behavior in Taiwan. This study investigates the changes in convertible bond (CB) issuance among listed firms in Taiwan across three distinct phases: pre-pandemic (2015–2019), during the pandemic (2020–2022), and post-pandemic (2023–2024). Empirical results show that during the pandemic, market volatility increased notably, prompting firms to favor CBs—offering both debt security and equity flexibility—as a compromise to mitigate financing uncertainty and information asymmetry, thereby driving up both the volume and value of CB issuance.
In the post-pandemic period, despite a decline in overall uncertainty, rising capital expenditure and growth demand led firms to shift their issuance motivation from "risk management" to "growth planning." This resulted in a continued increase in CB issuance: the average annual number of issuances rose from 70 (pre-pandemic) to 100 (during the pandemic), and further to 116 (post-pandemic). Regression analyses confirm that firms' growth potential, financial leverage, and the pandemic phase are key determinants of CB issuance. This study provides empirical support for the Pecking Order Theory and Backdoor Equity Theory, and partially aligns with Market Timing Theory, suggesting that firms use CBs as a strategic financing tool under varying macroeconomic conditions. The findings contribute to the limited literature on CB issuance in Taiwan during the COVID-19 era and offer practical implications for corporate financing decisions and regulatory policymaking. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-07-02T16:17:34Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-07-02T16:17:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | ⽬ 次
⼝試委員會審定書………………………………………………………………i 致謝………………………………………………………………………………ii 中⽂摘要…………………………………………………………………………iv 英⽂摘要…………………………………………………………………………v 目次………………………………………………………………………………vi 圖次………………………………………………………………………………viii 表次………………………………………………………………………………viii 第⼀章 緒論……………………………………………………………………1 第⼀節 研究背景與動機……………………………………………………1 第⼆節 研究⽬的……………………………………………………………5 第三節 研究範圍……………………………………………………………6 第四節 研究重要性…………………………………………………………7 第五節 章節架構……………………………………………………………8 第⼆章 ⽂獻回顧………………………………………………………………8 第⼀節 融資理論……………………………………………………………9 第⼆節 可轉債的相關⽂獻………………………………………………13 第三節 台灣市場的背景⽂獻……………………………………………18 第四節 研究缺⼝與貢獻…………………………………………………25 第三章 研究⽅法………………………………………………………………27 第⼀節 疫情對可轉債發⾏⾏為的影響……………………………………27 第⼆節 可轉債與無擔保可轉債偏好之成因……………………………30 第三節 可轉債發⾏總量與佔⽐的變化…………………………………36 第四章 實證分析與結果……………………………………………………39 第⼀節 疫情對可轉債發⾏總額的影響……………………………………39 第⼆節 可轉債與無擔保可轉債偏好之成因……………………………45 第三節 可轉債發⾏總量與佔⽐的變化…………………………………56 第五章 結論與建議……………………………………………………59 第⼀節 研究結論……………………………………………………………59 第⼆節 學術與實務貢獻…………………………………………………60 參考⽂獻……………………………………………………………………62 圖 次 第一章 緒論……………………………………………………………………1 圖1-1 疫情前中後之年平均可轉債發行件數……………………………1 圖1-2 疫情前中後之每年平均可轉債發行金額…………………………1 表 次 第二章 文獻回顧………………………………………………………………8 表2-1,公司與市場層級因素………………………………………………12 表2-2,疫情前與疫情期間之公司層面因素對比………………………22 表2-3,疫情期間與疫情後之之公司層面因素對比……………………23 表2-4,疫情前與疫情期間之市場層面因素對比………………………24 表2-5,疫情期間與疫情後之之市場層面因素對比……………………25 第三章 研究方法……………………………………………………………27 表3-1,可轉債轉換與擔保特性分佈統計…………………………………31 第四章 實證分析與結果………………………………………………………39 表4-1,迴歸1與迴歸2之結果……………………………………………40 表4-2,迴歸3與迴歸4之結果……………………………………………41 表4-3,迴歸5與迴歸6之結果……………………………………………46 表4-4,迴歸7與迴歸8之結果……………………………………………48 表4-5,迴歸9與迴歸10之結果……………………………………………50 表4-6,迴歸11與迴歸4之結果……………………………………………52 表4-7,迴歸13之結果………………………………………………………57 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 疫情 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 無擔保可轉債 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 可轉債 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Convertible Bonds | en |
| dc.subject | Issuance | en |
| dc.title | 台灣企業可轉債發行趨勢與影響因素分析:疫情前、中、後之比較研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Determinants of Convertible Bonds Issuance by Taiwanese Companies: A Comparative Study Before, During, and After the COVID-19 Pandemic | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃柏凱;張邦茹 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Po-Kai Huang;Pang-Ru Chang | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 可轉債,無擔保可轉債,疫情, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Convertible Bonds,Issuance, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 63 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202501279 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-06-26 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 財務金融學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2030-06-23 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 財務金融學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.44 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
