請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97522完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陸怡蕙 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Yir-Hueih Luh | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 黃楨甯 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Chen-Ning Huang | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-02T16:16:59Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-07-03 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-07-02 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-06-18 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文文獻
交通部全球資訊網,https://pse.is/76jfva 經濟部工業局,https://pse.is/76jg5c 電動機車產業網,https://www.lev.org.tw/index 黃上晏, 邱城英, & 廖妙羚. (2015)。台灣消費者購買電動機車意願之關鍵成功因素研究. 觀光與休閒管理期刊, 3(1), 139-152。 許書珮(2016)。電動機車創新營運模式之研究: 以 Gogoro電動機車為例。 王振宇(2018)。環保電動機車購買意圖之研究-TAM 模型觀點,淡江大學國際企業學系碩士班學位論文, 2018, 1-83。 英文文獻 Adnan, N., Nordin, S. M., Rahman, I., & Rasli, A. M. (2017). A new era of sustainable transport: An experimental examination on forecasting adoption behavior of EVs among Malaysian consumer. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 103, 279-295. Ahmad, S., Chaveeesuk, S., & Chaiyasoonthorn, W. (2024). The adoption of electric vehicle in Thailand with the moderating role of charging infrastructure: an extension of a UTAUT. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 43(1), 2387908. Afroz, R., Masud, M. M., Akhtar, R., Islam, M. A., & Duasa, J. B. (2015). Consumer purchase intention towards environmentally friendly vehicles: an empirical investigation in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22, 16153-16163. Axsen, J., & Kurani, K. S. (2013). Hybrid, plug-in hybrid, or electric—What do car buyers want?. Energy policy, 61, 532-543. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16, 74-94. Bruner II, G. C., & Kumar, A. (2005). Explaining consumer acceptance of handheld Internet devices. Journal of business research, 58(5), 553-558. Bandara, U. C., & Amarasena, T. S. M. (2018, October). Impact of relative advantage, perceived behavioural control and perceived ease of use on intention to adopt with solar energy technology in Sri Lanka. In 2018 International Conference and Utility Exhibition on Green Energy for Sustainable Development (ICUE) (pp. 1-9). IEEE. Buhmann, K. M., Rialp-Criado, J., & Rialp-Criado, A. (2024). Predicting Consumer Intention to Adopt Battery Electric Vehicles: Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior. Sustainability, 16(3), 1284. Boubker, O., Lakhal, M., Ait Yassine, Y., & Lotfi, H. (2024). Towards sustainable transport in the Moroccan context: The key determinants of electric cars adoption intention. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 15(4), 136. Chau, P. Y. (1996). An empirical assessment of a modified technology acceptance model. Journal of management information systems, 13(2), 185-204. Chen, S. Y. (2016). Using the sustainable modified TAM and TPB to analyze the effects of perceived green value on loyalty to a public bike system. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 88, 58-72. Chen, S. Y. (2016). Green helpfulness or fun? Influences of green perceived value on the green loyalty of users and non-users of public bikes. Transport Policy, 47, 149-159. Chen, C. F., Eccarius, T., & Su, P. C. (2021). The role of environmental concern in forming intentions for switching to electric scooters. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 154, 129-144. Chen, Y. S., & Chang, C. H. (2012). Enhance green purchase intentions: The roles of green perceived value, green perceived risk, and green trust. Management decision, 50(3), 502-520. Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Jeyaraj, A., Clement, M., & Williams, M. D. (2019). Re-examining the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): Towards a revised theoretical model. Information systems frontiers, 21, 719-734. Dong, X., Zhang, B., Wang, B., & Wang, Z. (2020). Urban households’ purchase intentions for pure electric vehicles under subsidy contexts in China: Do cost factors matter?. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 135, 183-197. Deka, C., Dutta, M. K., Yazdanpanah, M., & Komendantova, N. (2023). Can gain motivation induce Indians to adopt electric vehicles? Application of an extended theory of Planned Behavior to map EV adoption intention. Energy Policy, 182, 113724. Dagsvik, J. K., Wennemo, T., Wetterwald, D. G., & Aaberge, R. (2002). Potential demand for alternative fuel vehicles. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 36(4), 361-384. Dunlap, R. E., & Jones, R. E. (2002). Environmental concern: Conceptual and measurement issues. Handbook of environmental sociology, 3(6), 482-524. Darley, W. K., Blankson, C., & Luethge, D. J. (2010). Toward an integrated framework for online consumer behavior and decision making process: A review. Psychology & marketing, 27(2), 94-116. Dutta, B., & Hwang, H. G. (2021). Consumers purchase intentions of green electric vehicles: The influence of consumers technological and environmental considerations. Sustainability, 13(21), 12025. Egbue, O., & Long, S. (2012). Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: An analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions. Energy policy, 48, 717-729. Fabrigar, L. R., & Wegener, D. T. (2012). Exploratory factor analysis. Oxford University Press. Fang, W., Xin, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2023). Eco-label knowledge versus environmental concern toward consumer's switching intentions for electric vehicles: A roadmap toward green innovation and environmental sustainability. Energy & Environment, 0958305X231177735. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Gunawan, I., Redi, A. A. N. P., Santosa, A. A., Maghfiroh, M. F. N., Pandyaswargo, A. H., & Kurniawan, A. C. (2022). Determinants of customer intentions to use electric vehicle in Indonesia: An integrated model analysis. Sustainability, 14(4), 1972. Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1998). Factorial analysis. Multivariate Data Analysis. Fifth edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Ho, C. W., & Wu, C. C. (2021). Exploring Intention toward Using an Electric Scooter: Integrating the Technology Readiness and Acceptance into Norm Activation Model (TRA-NAM). Energies 2021, 14, 6895. Huang, S. K., Kuo, L., & Chou, K. L. (2018). The impacts of government policies on green utilization diffusion and social benefits–A case study of electric motorcycles in Taiwan. Energy Policy, 119, 473-486. Hair, J. (2009). Multivariate data analysis. Exploratory factor analysis. Henseler, J. (2012). PLS-MGA-A Non-Parametric Approach to Partial Least Squares-based Multi-Group Analysis. Challenges at the Interface of Data Analysis, Computer Science, and Optimization/Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Jayaraman, K., Yun, W. W., Seo, Y. W., & Joo, H. Y. (2015). Customers’ reflections on the intention to purchase hybrid cars: an empirical study from Malaysia. Problems and perspectives in management, (13, Iss. 2 (spec. iss.)), 304-312. Jain, N. K., Bhaskar, K., & Jain, S. (2022). What drives adoption intention of electric vehicles in India? An integrated UTAUT model with environmental concerns, perceived risk and government support. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 42, 100730. Jayasingh, S., Girija, T., & Arunkumar, S. (2021). Factors influencing consumers’ purchase intention towards electric two-wheelers. Sustainability, 13(22), 12851. Kaplan, S., Gruber, J., Reinthaler, M., & Klauenberg, J. (2016). Intentions to introduce electric vehicles in the commercial sector: A model based on the theory of planned behaviour. Research in Transportation Economics, 55, 12-19. Kaiser, F. G., & Fuhrer, U. (2003). Ecological behavior's dependency on different forms of knowledge. Applied psychology, 52(4), 598-613. Li, W., Long, R., & Chen, H. (2016). Consumers’ evaluation of national new energy vehicle policy in China: An analysis based on a four paradigm model. Energy Policy, 99, 33-41. Li, L., Zhu, B., Jiang, M., Cai, X., Lau, A. K., & Shin, G. C. (2020). The role of service quality and perceived behavioral control in shared electric bicycle in China: Does residual effects of past behavior matters?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 24518-24530. Liu, Y., & Lai, I. K. W. (2020). The effects of environmental policy and the perception of electric motorcycles on the acceptance of electric motorcycles: an empirical study in Macau. Sage Open, 10(1), 2158244019899091. Lin, Y. H., Tseng, M. L., Cheng, Y. L., Chiu, A. S., & Geng, Y. (2013). Performance evaluation of technological innovation capabilities in uncertainty. Scientific Research and Essays, 8(13), 501-514. MacKinnon, D. (2012). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Routledge. Müller, J. M. (2019). Comparing technology acceptance for autonomous vehicles, battery electric vehicles, and car sharing—A study across Europe, China, and North America. Sustainability, 11(16), 4333. Mau, P., Eyzaguirre, J., Jaccard, M., Collins-Dodd, C., & Tiedemann, K. (2008). The ‘neighbor effect’: Simulating dynamics in consumer preferences for new vehicle technologies. Ecological Economics, 68(1-2), 504-516. Mehrtens, J., Cragg, P. B., & Mills, A. M. (2001). A model of Internet adoption by SMEs. Information & management, 39(3), 165-176. Moon, S. J. (2020). Integrating diffusion of innovations and theory of planned behavior to predict intention to adopt electric vehicles. Int. J. Bus. Manag, 15(11), 88-103. Murtiningrum, A. D., Darmawan, A., & Wong, H. (2022). The adoption of electric motorcycles: A survey of public perception in Indonesia. Journal of cleaner production, 379, 134737. Nair, S., Rao, N., Mishra, S., & Patil, A. (2017, December). India's charging infrastructure—biggest single point impediment in EV adaptation in India. In 2017 IEEE transportation electrification conference (ITEC-India) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. Nunnally, J. C. (1975). Psychometric theory—25 years ago and now. Educational Researcher, 4(10), 7-21. Paul, J., Modi, A., & Patel, J. (2016). Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action. Journal of retailing and consumer services, 29, 123-134. Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2014). Diffusion of innovations. In An integrated approach to communication theory and research (pp. 432-448). Routledge. Roos, D., & Hahn, R. (2017). Does shared consumption affect consumers' values, attitudes, and norms? A panel study. Journal of Business Research, 77, 113-123. Rachmawati, I., & Rahardi, R. A. M. (2023). Analysis of electric vehicle purchase intentions in Indonesia using the extension C-TAM-TPB model. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 6(12), 8065-8078. Stren, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behaviour. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424. Schmalfuß, F., Mühl, K., & Krems, J. F. (2017). Direct experience with battery electric vehicles (BEVs) matters when evaluating vehicle attributes, attitude and purchase intention. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 46, 47-69. Sang, Y. N., & Bekhet, H. A. (2015). Modelling electric vehicle usage intentions: an empirical study in Malaysia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 92, 75-83. Singh, V., Singh, V., & Vaibhav, S. (2020). A review and simple meta-analysis of factors influencing adoption of electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 86, 102436. She, Z. Y., Sun, Q., Ma, J. J., & Xie, B. C. (2017). What are the barriers to widespread adoption of battery electric vehicles? A survey of public perception in Tianjin, China. Transport Policy, 56, 29-40. Syahputro, P., & Hadi, D. A. (2024). Understanding the Impact of Incentive Policy and Social Attribute to Enhance the Consumers’ Purchase Intentions towards BEVs: TPB Explained. JURNAL MANAJEMEN KEUANGAN PUBLIK, 8(1), 15-30. Sutopo, W., Hisjam, M., & Wicaksono, H. (2024). Exploring the determinants of intention to purchase electric motorcycles: the role of national culture in the UTAUT. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 100, 475-492. Shaikh, S., Talpur, M. A. H., Baig, F., Tariq, F., & Khahro, S. H. (2023). Adoption of Electric Motorcycles in Pakistan: A Technology Acceptance Model Perspective. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 14(10), 278. Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In Handbook of market research (pp. 587-632). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of social issues, 56(3), 407-424. Tarei, P. K., Chand, P., & Gupta, H. (2021). Barriers to the adoption of electric vehicles: Evidence from India. Journal of Cleaner Production, 291, 125847. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management science, 46(2), 186-204. Vafaei-Zadeh, A., Wong, T. K., Hanifah, H., Teoh, A. P., & Nawaser, K. (2022). Modelling electric vehicle purchase intention among generation Y consumers in Malaysia. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 43, 100784. Van Tuan, P., Thao, N. T. P., Le, T. T., Linh, N. T., & Tuan, H. M. (2022). Factors influencing purchasing intention toward electric vehicle in Vietnam. Journal of Social Commerce, 2(2), 82-99. Wang, N., Pan, H., & Zheng, W. (2017). Assessment of the incentives on electric vehicle promotion in China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 101, 177-189. Wu, J. H., Wu, C. W., Lee, C. T., & Lee, H. J. (2015). Green purchase intentions: An exploratory study of the Taiwanese electric motorcycle market. Journal of Business Research, 68(4), 829-833. Wang, S., Li, J., & Zhao, D. (2017). The impact of policy measures on consumer intention to adopt electric vehicles: Evidence from China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 105, 14-26. Wang, S., Fan, J., Zhao, D., Yang, S., & Fu, Y. (2016). Predicting consumers’ intention to adopt hybrid electric vehicles: using an extended version of the theory of planned behavior model. Transportation, 43, 123-143. Wang, H., Li, J., Mangmeechai, A., & Su, J. (2021). Linking perceived policy effectiveness and proenvironmental behavior: The influence of attitude, implementation intention, and knowledge. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(6), 2910. White, L. V., & Sintov, N. D. (2017). You are what you drive: Environmentalist and social innovator symbolism drives electric vehicle adoption intentions. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 99, 94-113. Wang, L., Zhang, Q., & Wong, P. P. W. (2022). Purchase intention for green cars among Chinese millennials: merging the value–attitude–behavior theory and theory of planned behavior. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 786292. Wu, J., Liao, H., Wang, J. W., & Chen, T. (2019). The role of environmental concern in the public acceptance of autonomous electric vehicles: A survey from China. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 60, 37-46. Xue, C., Zhou, H., Wu, Q., Wu, X., & Xu, X. (2021). Impact of incentive policies and other socio-economic factors on electric vehicle market share: A panel data analysis from the 20 countries. Sustainability, 13(5), 2928. Xia, Z., Wu, D., & Zhang, L. (2022). Economic, functional, and social factors influencing electric vehicles’ adoption: An empirical study based on the diffusion of innovation theory. Sustainability, 14(10), 6283. Yang, C., Tu, J. C., & Jiang, Q. (2020). The influential factors of consumers’ sustainable consumption: A case on electric vehicles in China. Sustainability, 12(8), 3496. Yeğin, T., & Ikram, M. (2022). Analysis of consumers’ electric vehicle purchase intentions: An expansion of the theory of planned behavior. Sustainability, 14(19), 12091. Yuniaristanto, Y., Utami, M. D., Sutopo, W., & Hisjam, M. (2022). Investigating key factors influencing purchase intention of electric motorcycle in Indonesia. Transactions on Transport Sciences, 13(1), 54-64. Zhang, X., & Bai, X. (2017). Incentive policies from 2006 to 2016 and new energy vehicle adoption in 2010–2020 in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70, 24-43. Zhang, X., Bai, X., & Shang, J. (2018). Is subsidized electric vehicles adoption sustainable: Consumers’ perceptions and motivation toward incentive policies, environmental benefits, and risks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 192, 71-79. Zhou, M., Long, P., Kong, N., Zhao, L., Jia, F., & Campy, K. S. (2021). Characterizing the motivational mechanism behind taxi driver’s adoption of electric vehicles for living: Insights from China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 144, 134-152. Zhang, J., Xu, S., He, Z., Li, C., & Meng, X. (2022). Factors Influencing Adoption Intention for Electric Vehicles under a Subsidy Deduction: From Different City-Level Perspectives. Sustainability, 14(10), 5777. Zhang, N., Guo, M., Bu, X., & Jin, C. (2023). Understanding green loyalty: A literature review based on bibliometric-content analysis. Heliyon. Zhang, X., & Chang, M. (2023). Applying the extended technology acceptance model to explore Taiwan’s generation Z’s behavioral intentions toward using electric motorcycles. Sustainability, 15(4), 3787. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97522 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 臺灣機車密度全球前列,截至2024年底,全國機車總數達1,465萬輛,成為日常通勤的主要交通工具,但同時也帶來了能源消耗與碳排放的挑戰。隨著全球減碳趨勢,各國積極推動新能源交通工具,臺灣亦積極響應「2050淨零排放」目標,規劃在2030年達成電動機車市售占比35%、2040年達100%的目標,致力於發展綠色交通工具並實現永續環境的願景。然而,現有文獻對於購買電動機車行為的實證研究仍相對有限,尤其缺乏綜合分析不同構面對消費者行為的交互影響。
為填補上述研究之缺口,本研究結合Davis et al. (1989)提出科技接受模型(Technology Acceptance Model, TAM)及Ajzen (1985)提出的計畫行為理論(Theory of Planned Behavior, TPB)作為購買及使用行為的分析基礎,並且加入代表生態意識的環境關注及外部因素等構面,深入分析科技接受構面、計畫行為構面、生態意識構面、及充電設施及政府政策等外部因素對於消費者電動機車購買意圖、購買行為及使用行為的影響。 本研究以線上問卷調查的方式蒐集資料,為進行實證分析,運用偏最小平方法的結構方程模型(Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Model, PLS-SEM)以驗證各變項間之關聯性。 此外,考量購買行為與續購行為以及購買行為與使用行為之間的相互關聯,本研究進一步透過似無相關雙元機率模型(seemingly unrelated bivariate probit model, SUR probit model),以檢視購買意圖是否為購買、續購行為及使用行為的主要影響因子。 研究結果顯示,主觀規範、政府政策、感知易用性、感知有用性與態度對購買意圖有顯著正向影響,其中感知易用性與感知有用性塑造消費者態度,環境關注與主觀規範強化消費者對社會期望的認同,政府政策則提高消費者的行為控制感與購買決策的信心。雖然環境關注對態度有正向影響,但其對實際購買意圖的影響並不顯著;知覺行為控制雖未對購買意圖產生顯著影響,但在實際購買、續購及使用行為上則呈現顯著正向影響,說明消費者對自身使用電動機車的能力越具信心,實際購買與後續使用的可能性亦隨之提高。充電設施未顯著影響購買意圖,顯示消費者對現有充電基礎設施的疑慮可能會抑制其購買意願。進一步分析購買、續購與使用行為的相互關聯,結果顯示三者間存在顯著的相關性,且購買意圖與知覺行為控制對購買、續購及使用行為均有正向影響。然而,充電設施對購買與使用行為呈顯著負向影響,顯示充電基礎設施的不足可能降低消費者的購買意圖,並影響其後續的使用與續購決策。綜合而言,研究結果強調了政府政策、感知易用性、感知有用性及社會規範對電動機車市場發展的重要性,並指出充電基礎設施的完善對推動市場普及相當重要。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Taiwan's motorcycle density ranks among the highest in the world. By the end of 2024, the total number of motorcycles in the country will reach 14.65 million, becoming the main means of transportation for daily commuting, but it also brings challenges in energy consumption and carbon emissions. As the global trend of carbon reduction continues, countries are actively promoting new energy vehicles. Taiwan has also actively responded to the "2050 Net Zero Emissions" goal, planning to achieve a 35% market share of electric motorcycles in 2030 and 100% in 2040, and is committed to developing green transportation and realizing the vision of a sustainable environment. However, the existing literature on empirical research on electric motorcycle purchasing behavior is still relatively limited, especially lacking a comprehensive analysis of the interactive impact of different constructs on consumer behavior.
To fill the gap in the above research, this study combines the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) proposed by Davis et al. (1989) and the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) proposed by Ajzen (1985) as the analysis basis for purchasing and usage behavior, and adds dimensions such as environmental concern and external factors representing ecological awareness to deeply analyze the impact of technology acceptance dimensions, planned behavior dimensions, ecological awareness dimensions, and external factors such as charging facilities and government policies on consumers' electric motorcycle purchase intentions, purchasing behaviors, and usage behaviors. This study collected data through an online questionnaire survey and used the Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Model (PLS-SEM) for empirical analysis. In addition, considering the correlation between purchase behavior and repurchase behavior and between purchase behavior and usage behavior, this study further uses a seemingly unrelated bivariate probit model (SUR probit model) to examine whether purchase intention is the main influencing factor of purchase, repurchase behavior and usage behavior. The research results show that subjective norms, government policies, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness and attitudes have a significant positive impact on purchase intention. Among them, perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness shape consumer attitudes, environmental concern and subjective norms strengthen consumers' identification with social expectations, and government policies enhance consumers' sense of behavioral control and confidence in purchasing decisions. Although environmental concern has a positive impact on attitude, its impact on actual purchase intention is not significant; although perceived behavioral control has no significant impact on purchase intention, it has a significant positive impact on actual purchase, continued purchase and usage behavior, indicating that the more confident consumers are in their ability to use electric scooters, the higher the possibility of actual purchase and subsequent use. Charging facilities did not significantly affect purchase intention, indicating that consumers' concerns about existing charging infrastructure may inhibit their purchase intention. Further analysis of the correlation between purchase, repurchase and usage behavior showed that there was a significant correlation among the three, and purchase intention and perceived behavioral control had a positive impact on purchase, repurchase and usage behavior. However, charging facilities have a significant negative impact on purchasing and usage behavior, indicating that insufficient charging infrastructure may reduce consumers' purchasing intentions and affect their subsequent usage and renewal decisions. Overall, the findings highlight the importance of government policies, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and social norms in the development of the electric motorcycle market, and point out that the improvement of charging infrastructure is crucial to promoting market penetration. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-07-02T16:16:59Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-07-02T16:16:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審書 i
致謝 ii 摘要 iii ABSTRACT v 目次 viii 圖次 x 表次 xi 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 動機與目的 2 第二章 文獻回顧 4 第一節 電動機車定義、發展及現況 4 第二節 電動車相關研究 10 第三節 消費者採用電動車之行為模型 12 第四節 電動汽機車研究常用分析方法 17 第三章 研究設計 20 第一節 實證架構與假說 20 第二節 問卷設計 26 第三節 信度與效度檢測結果 33 第四節 資料來源、變數說明與基本統計分析 35 第四章 實證資料之分析 38 第一節 偏最小平方法結構方程模型 38 第二節 電動機車購買行為 56 第五章 結論與後續建議 63 第一節 實證結果總結 63 第二節 建議 65 參考文獻 67 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 計畫行為理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 購買及續購行為 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 政府政策 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 充電設施 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 環境關注 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 科技接受模型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Government Policy | en |
| dc.subject | Charging Facilities | en |
| dc.subject | Environmental Concern | en |
| dc.subject | Theory of Planned Behavior | en |
| dc.subject | Technology Acceptance Model | en |
| dc.subject | Purchase And Renewal Behavior | en |
| dc.title | 電動機車購買意圖及行為之研究:生態意識消費的觀點 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A Study on the Purchasing Behavior of Electric Scooters: The Perspective of Eco-Conscious Consumption | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 魏敏芳 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | Min-Fang Wei | en |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 方珍玲;邱敬仁 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chen-Ling Fang;Ching-Ren Chiu | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 科技接受模型,計畫行為理論,環境關注,充電設施,政府政策,購買及續購行為, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Technology Acceptance Model,Theory of Planned Behavior,Environmental Concern,Charging Facilities,Government Policy,Purchase And Renewal Behavior, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 79 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202501174 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-06-18 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 農業經濟學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2025-07-03 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 農業經濟學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用(校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務) | 2.03 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
