請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97516完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 莊文議 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Wen-I Chuang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 蔡宏昱 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Hung-Yu Tsai | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-02T16:15:18Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-07-03 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-07-02 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-06-23 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Aboody, D., Even‐Tov, O., Lehavy, R., & Trueman, B. (2018). Overnight returns and firm‐specific investor sentiment. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 53(2), 485–505.
Ang, A., Chen, J., & Xing, Y. (2006). Downside risk. Review of Financial Studies, 19(4), 1191–1239. Ang, A., Hodrick, R. J., Xing, Y., & Zhang, X. (2006). The cross‐section of volatility and expected returns. Journal of Finance, 61(1), 259–299. Asness, C. S., Frazzini, A., & Pedersen, L. H. (2018). Quality minus junk. Review of Accounting Studies, 24, 34–112. Asness, C. S., Frazzini, A., Gormsen, N. J., & Pedersen, L. H. (2019). Betting against correlation: Testing theories of the low‐risk effect. Journal of Financial Economics, 135(3), 629–652. Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2006). Investor sentiment and the cross‐section of stock returns. Journal of Finance, 61(4), 1645–1680. Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2008). All that glitters: The effect of attention and news on the buying behavior of individual and institutional investors. Review of Financial Studies, 21(2), 785–818. Barberis, N., & Huang, M. (2008). Stocks as lotteries: The implications of probability weighting for security prices. American Economic Review, 98(5), 2066–2100. Bali, T. G., Brown, S. J., Murray, S., & Tang, Y. (2017). A lottery‐demand‐based explanation of the beta anomaly. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52(6), 2369–2397. Bali, T. G., & Cakici, N. (2008). Idiosyncratic volatility and the cross section of expected returns. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43(1), 29–58. Bali, T. G., Cakici, N., & Whitelaw, R. F. (2011). Maxing out: Stocks as lotteries and the cross‐section of expected returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 99(2), 427–446. Birru, J., & Young, T. (2022). Sentiment and uncertainty. Journal of Financial Economics, 146, 1148–1169. Black, F. (1972). Capital market equilibrium with restricted borrowing. Journal of Business, 45, 444–455. Bradrania, R., & Gao, Y. (2024). Lottery demand, weather and the cross‐section of stock returns. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 42, 100910. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1992). The cross‐section of expected stock returns. Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427–465. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2016). Dissecting anomalies with a five‐factor model. Review of Financial Studies, 29(1), 69–103. Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1977). Knowing with certainty: The appropriateness of extreme confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3(4), 552–564. Grullon, G., Kanatas, G., & Weston, J. P. (2004). Advertising, breadth of ownership, and liquidity. Review of Financial Studies, 17(2), 439–461. Han, B., & Kumar, A. (2013). Speculative retail trading and asset prices. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 48(2), 377–404. Harvey, C. R., & Siddique, A. (2000). Conditional skewness in asset pricing tests. Journal of Finance, 55(3), 1263–1295. Hou, K., Xue, C., & Zhang, L. (2020). Replicating anomalies. Review of Financial Studies, 33(5), 2019–2133. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80(4), 237–251. Karceski, J. (2002). Returns‐chasing behavior, mutual funds, and beta’s death. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 37(4), 559–594. Kraus, A., & Litzenberger, R. H. (1976). Skewness preference and the valuation of risk assets. Journal of Finance, 31(4), 1085–1100. Kumar, A. (2009). Who gambles in the stock market? Journal of Finance, 64(4), 1889–1933. Newey, Whitney K. and Kenneth D. West. A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent ovariance Matrix. Econometrica, 55(3):703{708, 1987. Novy‐Marx, R. (2016). Understanding defensive equity. NBER Working Paper No. 20591. Pyun, C. (2021). Documenting the post‐2000 decline in the idiosyncratic volatility effect. Critical Finance Review, 10(3), 419–427. Rubinstein, M. (1973). The fundamental theorem of parameter‐preference security valuation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 8(1), 61–69. Schneider, P. G., Wagner, C., & Zechner, J. (2020). Low‐risk anomalies? Journal of Finance, 75(5), 2673–2718. Stambaugh, R. F., Yu, J., & Yuan, Y. U. (2015). Arbitrage asymmetry and the idiosyncratic volatility puzzle. Journal of Finance, 70(5), 1903–1948. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97516 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究以 TEJ 台灣經濟新報資料庫中 1999 年至 2023 年上市及上櫃公司資料為樣本,採用 Fama–MacBeth 迴歸與單、雙變量投資組合分析,探討台灣市場中 Beta 異常現象與樂透需求(MAX)效應之存在及其與投資者情緒及市場不確定性間的交互影響。研究設計建立四組假說,檢驗依 Beta 或 MAX 排序時,超額報酬變化趨勢,以及高情緒與高不確定性環境下異常現象效應是否顯著放大。實證結果顯示,超額報酬隨風險指標升高而顯著下降,顯示 Beta 異常現象與 MAX 效應普遍存在,且主要由小型股驅動;此外,本研究發現 Beta 異常現象與 MAX 效應並非彼此獨立可控,其中 Beta 異常現象在高情緒環境下更明顯,MAX 效應則同時受情緒與市場不確定性影響。研究結果挑戰傳統 CAPM 高風險高報酬觀點,突顯投資者行為與市場環境因素在資產定價中的關鍵作用,為後續相關研究與實務操作提供實證依據與理論參考。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Using a sample of listed and over-the-counter companies from the TEJ Taiwanese Economic Journal database spanning 1999 to 2023, this study employs Fama–MacBeth regressions along with univariate and bivariate portfolio analyses to examine the existence of the beta anomaly and MAX effect in the Taiwanese market, as well as their interactive moderation by investor sentiment and market uncertainty. Four hypotheses are developed by sorting stocks based on beta and MAX factors to investigate the trend of excess returns relative to risk measures. Empirical findings reveal that as risk indicators increase, excess returns significantly decline, demonstrating the widespread presence of both the beta anomaly and the MAX effect, which are predominantly driven by small-cap stocks. Moreover, the study finds that the beta anomaly and the MAX effect are not independently controllable; specifically, the beta anomaly becomes more pronounced under high investor sentiment, whereas the MAX effect is simultaneously influenced by both sentiment and market uncertainty. These results challenge the traditional CAPM notion of high risk–high return, highlighting the critical roles of investor behavior and market environmental factors in asset pricing, and offering valuable empirical evidence and theoretical insights for future research and practical portfolio management. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-07-02T16:15:18Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-07-02T16:15:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要 i
英文摘要 ii 目 次 iii 表 次 iv 第一章 緒論 1 第二章 文獻回顧 3 第三章 研究設計 7 3.1 資料來源及研究樣本 7 3.2 變數定義 7 3.3 研究方法 9 3.3.1 分組方式與樣本切分 9 3.3.2 單變量投資組合 10 3.3.3 雙變量投資組合 10 3.3.4 Fama–MacBeth 迴歸分析 11 第四章 實證結果 12 4.1 全樣本 12 4.2 高低情緒 14 4.3 高不確定性 16 4.4 情緒與不確定性雙重切分 18 第五章 結論 21 參考文獻 22 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 投資人情緒 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 風險與報酬關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Beta 異常現象 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | MAX 效應 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 市場不確定性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Market uncertainty | en |
| dc.subject | Beta anomaly | en |
| dc.subject | MAX effect | en |
| dc.subject | Risk–return relationship | en |
| dc.subject | Investor sentiment | en |
| dc.title | 投資者情緒與市場不確定性下的 Beta 異常現象與 MAX 效應:以台灣股市為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Exploring the Beta Anomaly and MAX Effect under Investor Sentiment and Market Uncertainty: Evidence from the Taiwan Stock Market | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林姿婷;劉祥熹 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Tzu-Ting Lin;HSIANG-HSI LIU | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Beta 異常現象,MAX 效應,風險與報酬關係,投資人情緒,市場不確定性, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Beta anomaly,MAX effect,Risk–return relationship,Investor sentiment,Market uncertainty, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 85 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202501233 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-06-24 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 財務金融學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2030-06-20 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 財務金融學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf 此日期後於網路公開 2030-06-20 | 1.42 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
