請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97482完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳思寬 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Shi-Kuan Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 楊永得 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Yung-Te Yang | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-06-18T16:20:31Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-06-19 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-06-18 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-06-04 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文文獻
E公司公司年報2022~2024。 Hill, C., & Jones, G.(朱文儀等譯)(2007),策略管理概論。華泰文化。 工業技術研究院產業經濟與趨勢研究中心/TPCA(2023),銅箔基板市場發展與趨勢產業報告。 李佳怡(2015),國際市場進入模式與策略。國立臺灣大學之碩士論文。 孫克傳(2007),台灣電子級玻璃纖維布產業分析與競爭策略之研究。國立臺灣大學之碩士論文。 蔡孟修(2023),銅箔產業的營運發展策略探討—A公司之個案研究。國立臺灣大學之碩士論文。 蕭銘證(2007),台灣銅箔基板產業競爭策略之探討。國立臺灣大學之碩士論文。 二、英文文獻 Ansoff, I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124. Bain, J. S. (1956). Barriers to new competition: Their character and consequences in manufacturing industries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Baldwin, R., & Evenett, S. J. (2020). COVID-19 and Trade Policy: Why Turning Inward Won’t Work. The World Economy, 43(4), 1-25. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. Barney, J. B. (2001). Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 41–56. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1996). Co-opetition. Currency Doubleday. Brewster, C., Sparrow, P., & Vernon, G. (2016). International human resource management: The influence of context. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(8), 904-925. Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. (1976). The future of the multinational enterprise. Macmillan Press. Cappelli, P. (2008). Talent management for the twenty-first century. Harvard Business Review, 86(3), 74-81. Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press. Choi, S. B., & Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Harvard Business Review, 68(2), 73-83. Cho, W. C., Atukeren, E., & Yim, H. (2023). Overseas market expansion strategy of the global electronic components company based on AHP analysis. Systems, 11(1), 28. Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business Review Press. Christopher, M. (2000). The strategy of supply chain management: The role of logistics in a global economy. Wiley. D’Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Free Press. Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The Governance of Global Value Chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78-104. Gollnhofer, J. F., & Turkina, E. (2015). Cultural distance and entry modes: Implications for global expansion strategy. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 22(2), 131–144. Ghemawat, P. (2001). Distance still matters: The hard reality of global expansion. Harvard Business Review, 79(8), 137-147. Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114–135. Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109–122. Henderson, B. D. (1970). The product portfolio: A tool for managing growth and profitability. Boston Consulting Group. Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2001). Resource-based theory as a path to sustainable competitive advantage: The role of resources and capabilities. Academy of Management Executive, 15(4), 49–61. Ho, T. S. (1980). A Model of Dynamic Competition. Management Science, 26(3), 239-259. Hoopes, D. G., Madsen, T. L., & Walker, G. (2003). Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue: Why is there a resource‐based view? Toward a theory of competitive heterogeneity. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 889–902. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23-32. Kumar, V., Singh, R., & Tiwari, M. K. (2020). Digital transformation and sustainability: A systematic review. International Journal of Production Research, 58(5), 1493-1511. Luo, Y., & Tung, R. L. (2007). International expansion of emerging market enterprises: A springboard perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 481–498. Mason, E. S. (1939). Price and production policies of large-scale enterprise. American Economic Review, 29(1), 61–74. Nahavandi, A., & Malekzadeh, A. R. (1988). Organizational culture in the management of mergers and acquisitions. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 2(1), 82-93. Pla-Barber, J., & Villar, E. (Eds.). (2019). Global expansion strategies for multinationals from emerging markets. Springer. Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford University Press. Porter, M. E. (1980,1985). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. Free Press. Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Free Press. Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. (2001). Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 22–40. Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285–305. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and micro-foundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. Wright, P. M., Dunford, B. B., & Snell, S. A. (1994). Human resources and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based perspective. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 5(2), 301-326. 三、網站資料 台灣電路板協會網站:http://www.tpca.org.tw/。 股市公開資訊觀測站:http://newmops.tse.com.tw/。 全國碩博士論文網站:http://datas.ncl.edu.tw/。 維基百科網站:http://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/。 財團法人科技政策研究與資訊中心科技產業資訊室;http://cdnet.stpi.org.tw/intr。 台灣經濟研究院:http://www.tier.org.tw/。 MoneyDJ理財網:http://www.moneydj.com/。 電子時報:http://digitimes.com.tw/。 Yahoo奇摩股市:http://tw.stock.yahoo.com/。 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97482 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究以銅箔基板(Copper Clad Laminate, CCL)產業為背景,探討E公司在全球市場擴展過程中,如何從技術領先轉化為市場主導的競爭優勢。隨著AI伺服器、高頻通訊、電動車、低軌道衛星等新興應用推升對高階材料需求,CCL產業進入技術密集與高附加價值的轉型期。E公司因應全球市場變化與地緣政治風險,積極推動多元布局策略,透過技術創新、產能擴充與區域製造基地設立(如美國、馬來西亞),提升全球供應鏈韌性及客戶服務能力。研究指出,在市場集中度提高與供應鏈重組趨勢下,企業若欲鞏固競爭地位,必須同步提升技術開發能量、全球運營靈活性與在地市場滲透力。
其次,研究以波特五力分析、資源基礎理論(RBV)與動態能力理論等為基礎,剖析E公司如何整合內部資源與外部市場機會。E公司透過掌握高頻材料配方技術、建立全球領導OEM客戶緊密合作的模式,不僅強化了核心資源的不可模仿性,也快速回應客戶需求變化,展現出高度的動態調整能力。同時,E公司藉由多點生產基地布局,有效分散地緣風險,並提升供應鏈韌性與市場服務效率。套用BCG矩陣分析,確認產品的市場方向與擴展策略。透過動態事業組合管理,E公司靈活配置資源,以維持競爭優勢並支撐全球擴張。 最後,本研究提出E公司未來深化全球競爭優勢的具體建議。首先,應持續強化高階材料的技術研發與專利佈局,進一步擴大在高速通訊與AI伺服器市場的領先優勢;其次,加速北美、東南亞等地營運據點的建設與升級,提升區域市場反應速度與製造靈活性;再者,針對金牛事業產品線進行成本結構優化與營運效率提升,並有策略性地強化及培育問題事業領域,開發新興應用需求。此外,因應全球ESG及碳中和趨勢,積極投入綠色製程與循環材料開發,以建立可持續競爭優勢。整體而言,E公司唯有整合技術創新、全球供應鏈管理、組織調整與市場靈活應變能力,方能在動盪且高成長的國際市場環境中持續鞏固其領導地位。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study focuses on the Copper Clad Laminate (CCL) industry and explores how Company E transformed technological leadership into a market-dominant competitive advantage during its global expansion. With the rapid rise of emerging applications such as AI servers, high-frequency communications, electric vehicles, and low-earth orbit satellites, the demand for high-performance materials has surged, leading the CCL industry into a phase characterized by technology intensification and high value-added transformation. In response to global market shifts and geopolitical risks, Company E proactively pursued a diversified deployment strategy, strengthening supply chain resilience and customer service capabilities through innovation, capacity expansion, and the establishment of regional manufacturing bases (e.g., in the United States and Malaysia). The study highlights that, amid increasing market concentration and supply chain restructuring, companies must simultaneously enhance technological capabilities, operational flexibility, and local market penetration to solidify competitive positions.
Furthermore, the study applies Porter’s Five Forces analysis, the Resource-Based View (RBV), and the Dynamic Capabilities framework to examine how Company E integrates internal resources with external opportunities. By mastering high-frequency material formulation technologies and establishing close partnerships with leading OEM customers, Company E has enhanced the inimitability of its core resources and demonstrated strong dynamic adjustment capabilities in response to evolving demands. Additionally, by strategically deploying multiple production bases, Company E disperses geopolitical risks and improves supply chain resilience and service efficiency. Combined with BCG matrix analysis, the study also identifies market directions and expansion strategies across product lines. Through dynamic portfolio management, Company E flexibly allocates resources to sustain its competitive advantage and support global expansion. Finally, the study proposes specific strategies for Company E to further strengthen its global competitiveness. First, it should continuously enhance R&D and patent deployment for high-end materials, expanding its leadership in high-speed communications and AI server markets. Second, it should accelerate the construction and upgrading of operational bases in North America and Southeast Asia to improve regional responsiveness and manufacturing flexibility. Third, it should optimize cost structures and operational efficiency in cash cow product lines while strategically nurturing question-mark sectors. In addition, in response to ESG and carbon neutrality trends, Company E should actively invest in green manufacturing and circular materials development to build sustainable advantages. Overall, only by integrating innovation, supply chain management, organizational adjustments, and market agility can Company E solidify its leadership in a turbulent, high-growth international market environment. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-06-18T16:20:31Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-06-18T16:20:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目次
口試委員會審定書 I 致謝 II 中文摘要 III THESIS ABSTRACT IV 目次 VI 圖次 VIII 表次 X 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景及動機 1 第二節 研究問題與目的 3 第三節 研究方法及架構 5 第二章 文獻探討 8 第一節 相關理論探討 8 第二節 其他相關關鍵議題及理論 19 第三章 銅箔基板產業發展現狀 21 第一節 產業概況與技術背景 21 第二節 總體與市場趨勢分析 25 第三節 競爭態勢與競爭者分析 28 第四節 產業價值與關鍵指標分析 35 第四章 個案公司分析 39 第一節 公司介紹 39 第二節 E公司相關資源、能力與活動分析解析 43 第三節 個案公司的事業組合與關聯分析 45 第四節 個案公司的成長策略與作法 50 第五節 個案公司的事業策略與作法 53 第五章 結論與建議 63 第一節 研究結論 63 第二節 研究建議 64 第三節 研究限制 65 參考文獻 67 圖次 圖2-1 :波特五力分析模型 10 圖2-2 :BCG矩陣 18 圖3-1 :銅箔基板(CCL)主要原料 21 圖3-2 :銅箔基板製造流程 22 圖3-3 :PCB/CCL/電子產品產業鏈結構圖及應用領域 23 圖3-4 :CCL/PCB 技術示意圖(傳統PTH/HLC、HDI、IC載板、SIP/Module) 23 圖3-5 :工研院IEK/TPCA銅箔基板上下游供應鏈示意圖 24 圖3-6 :銅箔基板材料特性歸類及應用產品範圍 25 圖3-7 :2001~2027全球前20大電資通公司GDP趨勢圖比較 26 圖3-8 :2000~2027 PCB/CCL市場區域遷移圖、市場規模及成長趨勢 26 圖3-9 :2025全球主要經濟體經濟預測 27 圖3-10:全球電子產品出貨趨勢及預測 27 圖3-11:2023 CCL市場規模 28 圖3-12:2023全球前18 PCB營業額 30 圖3-13:全球的銅箔基板主要供應商及其市佔率 30 圖3-14:各競爭廠商對應不同的市場策略及運營管理-營業毛利 33 圖3-15:各競爭廠商對應不同的市場策略及運營管理-EPS 33 圖3-16:各競爭廠商對應不同的市場策略及運營管理-ROE & ROA 33 圖3-17:E公司各產品出貨量/產品產值與貢獻額%對應圖 37 圖3-18:E公司各產品出貨量/產品產值與貢獻額%對應圖 37 圖4-1 :E公司組織結構 39 圖4-2 :E公司全球佔比 40 圖4-3 :E公司全球經營據點 41 圖4-4 :E公司歷年營收及各階段營收成長主要引擎 41 圖4-5 :E公司歷年EPS 42 圖4-6 :各終端產品E公司全球佔比 43 圖4-7 :全球電子產品分類、市場分額及CAAGR 46 圖4-8 :Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research, Oct 2024 47 圖4-9 :E公司產品及市場BCG對應 49 圖4-10:E公司策略活動執行下的市佔比變化過程 53 圖4-11:E公司與競爭對手與技術的差異化-HDI 55 表次 表2-1 :各文獻探討內容比較表 13 表2-2 :從五力分析構面匯整內外部環境與資源及對應的VRIO架構 14 表2-3 :動態競爭觀點與關鍵要素 16 表2-4 :BCG分類及建議作為 18 表3-1 :CCL前十大廠商及其關注應用市場 31 表3-2 :本質相似的CCL廠商其策略、技術及優劣勢一覽 32 表3-3 :不同分析構面解析台灣三大CCL製造商 34 表3-4 :銅箔基板產業上中下游及相關價值分析表 35 表3-5 :E公司主要的五個產品其關鍵指標 36 表4-1 :E公司歷史獲利及過去五年營業毛利、稅後淨利 42 表4-2 :拆解E公司相關資源、能力及相關主要活動 43 表4-3 :材料等級對應產品類別及市場價值 48 表4-4 :E公司BCG類別及對應策略 49 表4-5 :E公司歷年策略成長事件一覽表(公司簡介) 52 表4-6 :E公司相關產品應用及相關競爭優勢 54 表4-7 :五力分析構面與動態競爭E公司相關行動 56 表4-8 :五力分析構面分析全球市場挑戰級E公司策略行為 58 表4-9 :E公司全球擴張面臨的問題及可行性作法分析 59 表4-10:組織架構、品牌管理及團隊績效與人才管理分析1 60 表4-11:組織架構、品牌管理及團隊績效與人才管理分析2 61 表4-12:E公司於競爭市長的獨特性 62 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 資源基礎理論(RBV) | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 銅箔基板產業(CCL) | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 波特五力分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | BCG矩陣分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 全球市場擴展策略 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | global market expansion strategy | en |
| dc.subject | Resource-Based View (RBV) | en |
| dc.subject | BCG matrix analysis | en |
| dc.subject | Copper Clad Laminate (CCL) industry | en |
| dc.subject | Porter’s Five Forces analysis | en |
| dc.title | 銅箔基板全球市場擴展策略: 從技術領先到市場主導的競爭優勢-以E公司為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Global Market Expansion Strategy for Copper Clad Laminate Industry: From Technological Leadership to Market-Dominating Competitive Advantage —- A Case Study of Company E | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 陳聿宏 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | Yu-Hung Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳厚銘;廖振男 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Homin Chen;Chen-Nan Liao | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 銅箔基板產業(CCL),波特五力分析,全球市場擴展策略,資源基礎理論(RBV),BCG矩陣分析, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Copper Clad Laminate (CCL) industry,Porter’s Five Forces analysis,global market expansion strategy,Resource-Based View (RBV),BCG matrix analysis, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 71 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202501037 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-06-05 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 碩士在職專班國際企業管理組 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2030-06-02 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 國際企業管理組 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf 此日期後於網路公開 2030-06-02 | 4.67 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
