Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97383Full metadata record
| ???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳肇鴻 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Chao-Hung Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 林蘭月 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Lan-Yue Lin | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-05-22T16:09:04Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-05-23 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-05-22 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-05-06 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Bibliography
Book Anyarat Maenpayak, Laws Related to Partnerships and Shareholding of Members of the House of Representatives and Ministers, Group 1, Office of Legal Affairs, House of Representatives, (2021). Arthur Gutman, Nepotism and Employment Law, in Robert G. Jones, Nepotism in Organizations (1st ed. 2011). Berndt, M., Global Differences in Corporate Governance Systems Theory and Implication for Reforms (2002). Birdthistle, Naomi & Hales, Rob. The Family Business – Meaning and Contribution to Global Economies (2023). Brown, Darrell. The Effectiveness of Shareholders’ Meetings: An Overview of Recent Developments (2015). D. Miller & I. Le Breton-Miller, Managing for the Long Run: Lessons in Competitive Advantage from Great Family Businesses (2005). David Kershaw, Company Law in Context: Text and Materials (2009). Davis, John A. “Definitions and Typologies of the Family Business." Harvard Business School Background Note 802-007 (2001). Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Jaiyos Co., Ltd., Doing Business in Thailand: A Comparative Guide, (2022). Hilburt-Davis, J., & Dyer, W. G., Consulting to Family Businesses: A Practical Guide to Contracting, Assessment, and Implementation (2003). Hodder, R., Patronage and Politics. In: High-level Political Appointments in the Philippines (2014), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-05-4_2. International Finance Corporation, Family Business Governance Handbook (2008). Jana Žuľová, Diversification of Family Forms in the Reflection of Employment Relations, in Labor Ipse Voluptas: Honoring Helena Barancová (2014). John L. Ward, Family Business: A Guide for Directors and Executives (2004). King, Mervyn, The Corporate Citizen: Governance for All Entities. Johannesburg: Penguin Books (2006). Kitipong Urapeepatpong, The Success Formula for Thai Family Businesses: For Sustainable Succession (2019). KPMG, Audit Committee Roundtable Highlights—2007 Building a Framework for Effective Audit Committee Oversight (2007). Legal Research and Development Center, Faculty of Law, Chulalongkorn University, Study Project to Promote the Establishment of Public Companies (1999). Martin Nowak & Roger Highfield, Super Cooperators: Evolution, Altruism and Human Behavior or Why We Need Each Other to Succeed (2011). Michael Johnston, ed., Political Corruption: Concepts and Contexts (2002). Monticelli, Jefferson & Bernardon, Renata & Trez, Guilherme & Garrido, Ivan. Entrepreneurship and family business-Competitive sessions Internationalization for successful transgenerational practices in family businesses (2019). Napassorn Harnchaikittikul, Ownership Concentration, Corporate Governance, and Firm’s Risk-Behavior: Evidence from Thailand (2021). Natrah, Hafatin & Ratnam, Nava & Tay, Alexander & Heng, Han, Guanxi and Growth: Family Business Dynamics and Nepotism in China (2024). Niramol Suthammakit, Society and Economy: A Case Study of Thailand (1957-2002) (2008). Nontawat Navaratnapitak, Laws on Companies and Partnerships: Limited Companies and Public Limited Companies (6th ed. 2023). OECD, G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (2015). OECD, G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance 2023 (2023). Paul L. Davies, Gower and Davies’ Principles of Modern Company Law (10th ed. 2016). Phanarat Maschamadol, Constitutional Law and Political Institutions (2nd ed. 2023) Phonsak Chirakraisiri, Integration of Chinese Youth in Thailand: Politics, Change, and Development (1988). Pitiyasak, S., “4 Thai Company Laws and Good Governance Practices of Unlisted Companies”, In Montreevat, S. ed., Corporate Governance in Thailand (2005). Puangchon Unchanam, Royal Capitalism: Wealth, Class, and Monarchy in Thailand (2020). Sahathorn Rattanapaijit, Law on Partnerships and Companies (4th ed 2018). Sittithep Eksitthipong, The Chinese Rebellion “on Phlapphla Chai Road” (2012). Somkiat Tangkitvanich, Political Connections and Returns from the Thai Stock Market, in C. Pinthong ed., Knowing Thaksin 2 (Roo Tun Thaksin 2) (2004). Sophon Rattanakorn. Explanation of Partnership and Company Law (2004). Sumitra Tangsomwongpong, Family Businesses in the Thai Stock Market: Roles and Growth (2023). Sunan Kogin, Thai Psychology: Values and Behavioral Patterns (1991). Supachai Bunchasak, A Study on Conflict of Interest in Private Sector Business Operations (2011). Supattararin Asavavallobh, Minority Shareholders’ Right to Derivative Action under the Public Company Act 1992 (2018). Suthabadee Sattabus, Law for Shareholders and Directors of Public Limited Companies (2010). Sutthabadee Sattabusay, Law for Shareholders and Directors of Public Companies Limited (1994). T. Clarke, International Corporate Governance: A Comparative Approach (2007). Teera Singhanaphant, Section-by-Section Explanation of the Civil and Commercial Code on Partnerships and Companies (7th ed. 2012). Thak Chaloemtiarana, The Politics of Despotic Paternalism (2nd ed. 2005). The Hong Kong Inst. of Chartered Sec’ys, Guidance Note: A Practical Guide to Good Governance – Nomination Committee Terms of Reference (2006). The Stock Exchange of Thailand, Roles, Duties, and Responsibilities of the Board of Directors of Listed Companies (1997). Thipchanok Rattanosot, Section-by-Section Explanation of the Partnership and Company Law (2013). Thitima Sitthipongpanich, The Impact of Political Revolution on Firm Performance in Thailand (2012). Articles Akhmedov B.T., The Family as the Basic Unit of Society, 8(12) INT’L J. MULTICULTURAL & MULTIRELIGIOUS UNDERSTANDING 201 (December 2021), https://doi.org/10.18415/ ijmmu.v8i12.3270. Alan R. Palmiter, Duty of Obedience: The Forgotten Duty, 55 N.Y.L. SCH. L. REV. 457 (2010-2011). Al-Shebli, A., & Alhajri, T. M., The Role of Cumulative Voting in Protecting Minority Shareholders in Listed Companies. 18(8) REVISTA DE GESTÃO SOCIAL E AMBIENTAL 1 (2024), https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n8-060. Aluchna, M., Kuszewski, T., Responses to corporate governance code: evidence from a longitudinal study. 16 REV MANAG SCI 1945 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-021-00496-3. Anderson, Ronald C., & Reeb, David M., Founding-Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500, 58(3) THE JOURNAL OF FINANCE (Jun., 2003). Andre Azoury, Lindos Daou & Fares Sleiaty, Employee Engagement in Family and Non-Family Firms, 1 INT’L STRATEGIC MGMT. REV. 11 (2013). Andrew Keay, Stewardship Theory: Is Board Accountability Necessary?, 59 INT’L J.L. & MGMT 1292 (2017). Andrew S. Gold, The New Concept of Loyalty in Corporate Law, 43 U.C. DAVIS L. REV. 457 (2009). Anna Persson, Bo Rothstein & Jan Teorell, Why Anticorruption Reforms Fail—Systemic Corruption as a Collective Action Problem, 26 GOVERNANCE 449 (2013). Aramide A. Kuforiji, The Ethical Implications of Nepotism and Corruption in Professional Environments, 4 AKSU J. ADMIN. & CORP. GOVERNANCE 101 (2024), https://doi.org/10.61090/aksujacog.2024.042. Archie B. Carroll, A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance, 4 ACAD. MGMT. REV. 497 (1979). Arjaree Prachuabmoh, et al., The Relationship Between Structure of the Board of Directors and the Performance of Companies Listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand, 19 KASEM BUNDIT J. (Special Ed.) 687 (2018). Arregle, Jean-Luc et al., Why Is Family Firms’ Internationalization Unique? A Meta-Analysis, 41 ENTREP. THEORY & PRAC. 801 (2017). Atichat Khamphuang & Onanong Insaard, Philosophy of Confucius and Social Organization: The Study of the Confucian Analects, 8(2) J. LANGUAGE, RELIGION & CULTURE 1 (2019) (Thai.). Ayres, Ian, Regulating Opt-Out: An Economic Theory of Altering Rules, 121 YALE LAW J. 2032 (2011). Bammens Y, Voordeckers W, Van Gils A., Boards of directors in family businesses: a literature review and research agenda. 13(2) INT J MANAG REV 134 (2011). Barney, J., Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. 17(1) JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT 99 (1991), 0.1177/014920639101700108. Bennedsen, M., Lu, Y. C., & Mehrotra, V., A survey of Asian family business research. 51 ASIA‐PACIFIC JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STUDIES 7 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1111/ajfs.12363. Bertrand, Marianne, and Antoinette Schoar. The Role of Family in Family Firms. 20 J. ECON. PERSPECTIVES 73 (2006). Bhat, Mohd & Shah, Javeed., The Influence of Family Culture on Performance of Family Business: An Empirical Study. 2(1) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMMERCE, BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT 1 (February, 2013). Bores-García et al., Research on Cooperative Learning in Physical Education: Systematic Review of the Last Five Years, 92 RES. Q. FOR EXERCISE & SPORT 146 (2021). Boxx, K.E., Too Many Tiaras: Conflicting Fiduciary Duties in the Family-Owned Business Context, 49 HOUS. L. REV. 669 (2012), https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/faculty-articles/175. Bruner, C.M., GoodFaith, State of Mind, and the Outer Boundaries of Director Liability in Corporate Law, 41WAKE FOREST L. REV. 1131 (2006). Carlo Osi, Family Business Governance and Independent Directors: The Challenges Facing an Independent Family Business Board, 11 U. PA. J. BUS. L. 836 (2009). Caterina Tantalo & Richard L. Priem, Value Creation Through Stakeholder Synergy, 37 STRATEGIC MGMT. J. 314 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2337. Charles W. Steadman & George D. Gibson, Should Cumulative Voting for Directors Be Mandatory?—A Debate, 11 THE BUSINESS LAWYER 12 (1955). Chrisman, J.J., Chua, J.H., & Sharma, P., Family Business: Its Governance and Performance, 23(3) JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING 261 (2008). Clarke, T. & Klettner A., Governance Issues for SMEs, 4 J. BUS. SYS., GOVERNANCE & ETHICS 23 (2009). Coles, Jeffrey L., Daniel, Naveen D., & Naveen, Lalitha. Boards: Does One Size Fit All?, 87(2) JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS 329 (2008). Combs, J. G., et al., The impact of family representation on CEO compensation. Entrepreneurship, 34(6) THEORY AND PRACTICE 1125, http://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1540- 6520.2010.00417.x Dharmastuti, C. & Wahyudi, S., The Effectivity of Internal and External Corporate Governance Mechanisms Towards Corporate Performance, 4(4) RESEARCH J. OF FIN. & ACCOUNTING (2013), http://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/RJFA/ article/view/6345. Dianara Safina, Favoritism and Nepotism in an Organization: Causes and Effects, 23 PROCEDIA ECON. & FIN. 630 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00416-5. Donaldson & Davis, Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns, 16 AUSTL. J. MGMT. 49 (1991). Douglas A. Bosse & Robert A. Phillips, Agency Theory and Bounded Self-Interest, 41 ACAD. MGMT. REV. 276 (2016). Douglas M. Branson, A Business Judgment Rule for Incorporating Jurisdictions in Asia?, 23 SACLJ 687 (2011). Eugene F. Fama, Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm, 88(2) J. POL. ECON 288 – 307 (1980). Ewens, Michael and Xiao, Kairong and Xu, Ting, Regulatory Costs of Being Public: Evidence from Bunching Estimation, JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS (2023), Forthcoming, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3740722. Felipe Hernández-Perlines et al., Socioemotional Wealth: A Systematic Literature Review from a Family Business Perspective, 29 EUR. RES. MGMT. & BUS. ECON 1 (2023). Freeman, R. E. & Dmytriyev, S., Corporate Social Responsibility and Stakeholder Theory: Learning From Each Other, 1 SYMPHONYA. EMERGING ISSUES IN MANAGEMENT 7 (2017), 10.4468/2017.1.02freeman.dmytriyev. Geoffrey Martin, Joanna Tochman Campbell & Luis R. Gomez-Mejia, Family Control, Socioemotional Wealth, and Earnings Management in Publicly Traded Firms, J. BUS. ETHICS (2015), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2403-5. Gillan, Stuart L., & Laura T. Starks. Corporate Governance, Corporate Ownership, and the Role of Institutional Investors: A Global Perspective. 19 J. Applied Corp. Fin. 39, 43–45 (2007). Gilson, Ronald J., & Jeffrey N. Gordon. Controlling Controlling Shareholders. 152 U. Pa. L. Rev. 785, 786–88 (2003). Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Patel, P. C., & Zellweger, T. M., In the Horns of the Dilemma: Socioemotional Wealth, Financial Wealth, and Acquisitions in Family Firms. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1 (2015), http://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315614375. Gómez-Mejía, Luis R., et al. Socioemotional Wealth and Business Risks in Family-controlled Firms: Evidence from Spanish Olive Oil Mills. 52 ADMIN. SCI. Q. 106 (2007). Gordon L. Clark & Eric R.W. Knight, Implications of the UK Companies Act 2006 for Institutional Investors and the Corporate Social Responsibility Movement, 11 PENSIONS: AN INT’L J 259 (2008). Hayagreeva Rao & K. Sivakumar, Institutional Sources of Boundary-Spanning Structures: The Establishment of Investor Relations Departments in the Fortune 500 Industrials, 10 ORG. SCI. 27 (1999), https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.1.27. Hermann Frank, Manfred Lueger, Lavinia Nosé & Daniela Suchy, The Concept of "Familiness": Literature Review and Systems Theory-Based Reflections, 1 J. FAM. BUS. STRATEGY 119 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2010.08.001. Herrero, I., Agency Costs, Family Ties, and Firm Efficiency. 37(3) JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT 887 (2011), http://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310394866. Ho Ngoc Hien & Phan Dang Hai, The Theories of Corporate Governance and Suggested Solutions to Its Legislation Completion in Vietnam, 11(12) INT’L J. MGMT. 12 (2020). Huse, M., Boards of directors in SMEs: A review and research agenda. 12(4) ENTREPRENEURSHIP & REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT 271 (2000), https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620050177912. Isabelle Le Breton-Miller, Danny Miller & Richard H. Lester, Stewardship or Agency? A Social Embeddedness Reconciliation of Conduct and Performance in Public Family Businesses, 22 ORG. SCI. 704 (2011). J. Dieguez-Soto, Pilar López-Delgado & Alfonso A. Rojo-Ramírez, Identifying and Classifying Family Businesses, 9 REV. MANAGERIAL SCI. 303 (2015). J. H. Chua, J. J. Chrisman & P. Sharma, Defining the Family Business by Behavior, 23 ENTREP. THEORY & PRAC. 19 (1999). J.H. Astrachan & M.C. Shanker, Family Businesses’ Contribution to the U.S. Economy: A Closer Look, 16 FAM. BUS. REV. 211 (Sept. 2003). James H. Davis, F. David Schoorman & Lex Donaldson, Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management, 22 ACAD. MGMT. REV. 20 (1997), https://doi.org/10.2307/259223. James Ockey, Monarch, Monarchy, Succession and Stability in Thailand, 35 ASIAN J. SOC. SCI. 455 (2005), https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8373.2005.00267.x. Jeffrey M. Cucina & Lisa Votraw, Revising Antinepotism Policies: Should the Private Sector Be More Like the Federal Government?, 8 INDUS. & ORG. PSYCHOL. 45 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2014.11. Jeremy H. Kemp, From Kinship System to Patronage System, 19 J. SOC. SCI. 5 (1982), https://digital.car.chula.ac.th/cujss/vol19/iss1/5. John A. Davis, Renato Tagiuri, Bivalent Attributes of the Family Firm, 19 FAM. BUS. REV. 199 (1996). Joseph Sarkis, An Organizational Theoretic Review of Green Supply Chain Management Literature, 130 INT’L J. PROD. ECON. 1 (2011). Konnut Pugatekaew, Yanin Tangpinyoputtikhun, Nitiphong Songsrirote & Suwan Wangcharoendate, The Concentration of Family Shareholders, Governance, and Personal Relationships of Executives and Earnings Management, 40(4) UNIVERSITY OF THE THAI CHAMBER OF COMMERCE JOURNAL HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES 16 (Sept. 15, 2020). Konnut Pugatekaew, Yanin Tangpinyoputtikhun, Nitiphong Songsrirote & Suwan Wangcharoen, The Role of the Family in a Concentrated Shareholding Structure and Good Governance in the Family Business, 38(1) SONGKLANAKARIN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCES 136 (2021). Le Breton-Miller, I., & Miller, D., Agency vs. stewardship in public family firms: A social embeddedness reconciliation. 33(514) Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 1169 (2009), http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540- 6520.2009.00339.x. Le Breton-Miller, I., & Miller, D., Why do some family businesses out-compete? Governance, long-term orientations, and sustainable capability. 30(6) ENTREPRENEURSHIP: THEORY AND PRACTICE 731 (2006), http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00147.x. Leenders, Mark, & Eric Waarts. Competitiveness and Evolution of Family Businesses: The Role of Family and Business Orientation. 21 Eur. Mgmt. J. 686–690 (2003). Lena Naldi, Mattias Nordqvist, Kerstin Sjöberg & Johan Wiklund, Entrepreneurial Orientation, Risk Taking, and Performance in Family Firms, 20 Fam. Bus. Rev. 33 (2007). Limpaphayom, Piman, & J. Thomas Connelly. Corporate Governance in Thailand. SSRN Elec. J., June 2004, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.965300. Lori McMillan, The Business Judgment Rule as an Immunity Doctrine, 4 WM. & MARY BUS. L. REV. 521 (2013), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmblr/vol4/iss2/5. Luis R. Gómez-Mejía & Inés Herrero, Back to Square One: The Measurement of Socioemotional Wealth (SEW), 13 J. FAM. BUS. STRATEGY 100480, 1 (Dec. 2022). Luis R. Gomez-Mejia, et al., Socioemotional Wealth in Volatile, Uncertain, Complex, and Ambiguous Contexts: The Case of Family Firms in Latin America and the Caribbean, 15 J. FAM. BUS. STRATEGY 100551 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2022.100551. Manuel Alfonso Garzón Castrillón, Corporate Governance: A Definition Based on Five Key Components, 25(2) REVISTA CIENTÍFICA "VISIÓN DE FUTURO" 178 (2021). Margaret M. Blair & Lynn A. Stout, Trust, Trustworthiness, and the Behavioral Foundations of Corporate Law, 149 U. PA. L.REV. 1735 (2001). Mark A. Underberg, Business Judgment Rule in Derivative Suits Against Directors, 65 CORNELL L. REV. 600 (1980). Martin Gelter, Why do Shareholder Derivative Suits Remain Rare in Continental Europe?, 37(3) BROOKLYN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 843 (2012). Masiye Banda & Austin Mwange, Corporate Governance: A Conceptual Analysis, 14 RES. J. FIN. & ACCT. 2 (2023), https://doi.org/10.7176/RJFA/14-17-05. McMillan, The Business Judgment Rule as an Immunity Doctrine, 4 WM & MARY BUS L REV 521 (2013). Michael N. Young, et al., Principal-Principal Agency, 2002(1) ACAD. MGMT. PROC., https://doi.org/10.5465/APBPP.2002.7516497. Miller, D., et al., Filling the Institutional Void: The Social Behavior and Performance of Family vs. Non-Family Technology Firms in Emerging Markets, 40 J. INT’L BUS. STUD. 802 (2009). Miller, Danny & Peter Friesen, A Longitudinal Study of the Corporate Life Cycle, 30(1) MGMT. SCI. (1984), https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.10.1161. Mohammad Azizi, Masoud Salmani Bidgoli, Jane F. Maley & Marina Dabić, A Stewardship Perspective in Family Firms: A New Perspective for Altruism and Social Capital, 144 J. BUS. RES. 764 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.02.030. Moore, C.R., Obligations in the Shade: The Application of Fiduciary Directors’ Duties to Shadow Directors, 36 LEGAL STUD 326 (2016). Moses Acquaah, Management Control Systems, Business Strategy and Performance: A Comparative Analysis of Family and Non-Family Businesses in a Transition Economy in Sub-Saharan Africa, 4 J. FAM. BUS. STRATEGY 131 (2013). Naomi Chambers, et al., Towards a Framework for Enhancing the Performance of NHS Boards: A Synthesis of the Evidence About Board Governance, Board Effectiveness and Board Development, NIHR JOURNALS LIBRARY (2013), https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK259417/ Narayanasamy Sugundan et al., Nepotism and Family-Owned Business, 7 INT’L J. ENG. & TECH. 26722 (2017), https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.39.26722. Lertnuwat, Nilubol. The Missing Part in Law on Derivative Action: The Study of Private Company. 48(1) Thammasat L.J. 70 (2019). Pargendler, Mariana. The Corporate Governance Obsession. 42 Iowa J. Corp. L. 14–17 (2014). Paonil, T., Problems Concerning the Liability of Directors and Shadow Directors as Managers of Companies: A Study of Cases of Prohibiting Careers as Directors, 2(2) RAMKHAMHAENG L.J. 56 (2013). Pascual Berrone, Cristina Cruz & Luis R. Gomez-Mejia, Socioemotional Wealth in Family Firms: Theoretical Dimensions, Assessment Approaches, and Agenda for Future Research, 25 FAM. BUS. REV. 258 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511435355. Peter Jaskiewicz & Sabine B. Rau, The Impact of Goal Alignment and Board Composition on Board Size in Family Firms, 60 J. BUS. RES. 1080 (Oct. 2007), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.015. Phatthanasutinon, T., Conceptual Metaphor Related to “Bunkhun” in Thai, 22(2) VANNAVIDAS 41 (2022). Phrakhru Wateethammawipat, Phrakhru Wijitrattanawat, Phrakhru Rurattanasutakor & Pairat Chimhad, The Patronage System and Bargaining Power of Political Parties, J. OF MCU NAKHONDHAT, MAHACHULALONGKORNRAJAVIDYALAYA UNIV. (Apr. 16, 2020). R. Anderson & D. M. Reeb, Founding Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500, 58 J. FINANCE 1301 (2003). Rafael Basco & María Jesús Pérez Rodríguez, Studying the Family Enterprise Holistically: Evidence for Integrated Family and Business Systems, 22 FAM. BUS. REV. 82 (2009). Rebeca García-Ramos, Belén Díaz-Díaz & Myriam García-Olalla, Independent Directors, Large Shareholders and Firm Performance: The Generational Stage of Family Businesses and the Socioemotional Wealth Approach, 20 J. FAM. BUS. STRATEGY 179 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.10.003. Ritthaporn Khieosanit, Fiduciary Duty and Breaches of Duty of Directors and Executives in Limited Companies Under Civil and Commercial Law, 1(1) JUSTICE PROCESS JOURNAL 1 (2008). Ronald J. Gilson, The Political Economy of Corporate Voting Rights, 41 JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS 351 (1998). Ronald U. Mendoza et al., Political Dynasties, Business, and Poverty in the Philippines, 7 J. GOV’T & ECON. 100051 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jge.2022.100051. Rupert Hasenzagl, Isabella Hatak & Hermann Frank, Problematizing Socioemotional Wealth in Family Firms: A Systems-Theoretical Reframing, 30 ENTREPRENEURSHIP & REG’L DEV. 199 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2017.1401123. Samraddhi Mutha, Role of Shadow Directors, 3(3) INDIAN J. INTEGRATED RSCH. L. (n.d.). Sayed Shahbal, Relationship Between Nurses’ Satisfaction and Their Perception of Nepotism Practice in Workplace, 41 J. JILIN UNIV. (Eng’g & Tech. Ed.) 138 (2022), https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/CA57R. Shaker A. Zahra, Entrepreneurial Risk Taking in Family Firms, 18 FAM. BUS. REV. 23 (2005). Sitthipongpanich, T., The Presence and Formation of Business-Political Connections in Thailand, 101 BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION JOURNAL. Sombun Siriprachai, Law: A Support or Hindrance to Thailand’s Economic Development?, 27 Thailand & World Econ. (Thammasat Econ. Rev.) (2009), https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/TER/article/view/136622. Soto, Julio, et al., Identifying and classifying family businesses. 9 REVIEW OF MANAGERIAL SCIENCE. 603 (2015), 10.1007/s11846-014-0128-6. Sritanee, Natthawut, Rawi Lonkani, & Chaiyawut Tangsomchai. The Effects of Ownership Concentration on Managerial Discretion of the Non-Life Insurance Businesses in Thailand. 45(2) Creative Bus. & Sustainability J. 22, 22–41 (2023), https://doi.org/10.58837/CHULA.CBSJ.45.2.2. Sugundan, N., Raja, S. & Jaganathan, G.S., Nepotism and Family-Owned Business, SSRN Elec. J (2018), https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4204568. Swanpitak, T., Xiaofei Pan & Sandy Suardi, The Value of Family Control During Political Uncertainty: Evidence from Thailand’s Constitutional Change in 2014, 44 EMERGING MARKETS REV (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2020.100721. Syriopoulos, T. & Tsatsaronis, M., Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Financial Performance: CEO Duality in Shipping Firms, 2(1) EURASIAN BUSINESS REVIEW 5 (2012). Timothy G. Habbershon & Mary Williams, A Resource-Based Framework for Assessing the Strategic Advantages of Family Firms, 12(1) FAM. BUS. REV. 1 (1999). Tom Baker and Sean J Griffith, Predicting Corporate Governance Risk: Evidence from the Directors’& Officers’Liability Insurance Market, 74 CHICAGO LAW REVIEW 487 (2007). Tosakul Putthapark & Suwicha Paoaree, Patronage System in the Kinship Context and the Operations of Local Administrative Organizations: A Case Study of a Local Administrative Organization in Mueang Nakhon Ratchasima District, Nakhon Ratchasima Province, 11 J. POL. & GOV’T 21 (2021) (Thail.). Vorachattara, Y., The Importance of Non-Executive Directors (Part 1), 8(11) JOURNAL OF INVESTMENT KNOWLEDGE AND THAI CAPITAL MARKET DEVELOPMENTS (2005). Vorachattara, Y., The Importance of Non-Executive Directors (Part 2), 8(12) JOURNAL OF INVESTMENT KNOWLEDGE AND THAI CAPITAL MARKET DEVELOPMENTS (2005). W. Gibb Dyer Jr. & Ivan Lansberg, Succeeding Generations: Realizing the Dream of Families in Business, 45 ADMIN. SCI. Q. 401 (2000), https://doi.org/10.2307/2667077. Walter Reina, José Pla-Barber & Cristina Villar, Socioemotional Wealth in Family Business Research: A Systematic Literature Review on Its Definition, Roles and Dimensions, 41 EUR. MGMT. J. 1 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2022.10.009. Yannick Bammens, Wim Voordeckers & Anita Van Gils, Boards of Directors in Family Businesses: A Literature Review and Research Agenda, 16 J. MGMT. & GOVERNANCE 1 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00289. Yasser, Corporate Governance in Family Businesses – A Review, 11 PAC. BUS. REV. INT’L 138 (2018). Yu-Hsin Lin & Yun-Chien Chang, An Empirical Study of Corporate Default Rules and Menus in China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan, 15(4) J. EMPIRICAL LEGAL STUD. (Oct. 4, 2018), https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12200. Yu-Hsin Lin & Yun-Chien Chang, Does Mandating Cumulative Voting Weaken Controlling Shareholders? A Difference-in-Differences Approach, 52 INT’L REV. L. & ECON. (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2017.09.003. Yuldinawati, Lia & Oktadanio, M.Y., Small family business development from three dimension of family business model. 10(S1) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT 197 (2016). Statute Act Prescribing Offences Related to Registered Partnerships, Limited Partnerships, Limited Companies, Associations and Foundations, B.E. 2499 (1956). Acts of Parliament 2013, (India). Announcement of the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) on the Determination of the Number of Shares in a Limited Company or Public Limited Company That Members of Independent Agencies and State Officials, B.E. 2563, dated February 19, 2020. 126(2) § 3. Announcement of the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) on the Criteria for Individuals Living Together as Husband and Wife Without a Registered Marriage, Considered as Spouses, B.E. 2561, dated September 21, 2018 § 3. Announcement of the Securities and Exchange Commission No. TorChor. 21/2551(2008) on Guidelines for Connected Transactions, stipulating that listed companies must comply with the criteria set by the Stock Exchange. Australia’s Corporations Act (2001) Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014, Rule 4 (India). Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014, Rule 6 (India). Companies Act 2006. Company Law of the People’s Republic of China art. 148 (promulgated by the Standing Comm. Nat’l People’s Cong., December 29, 1993, effective July 1, 1994). Company Law of the People’s Republic of China art. 148(V) (promulgated by the Standing Comm. Nat’l People’s Cong., December 29, 1993, effective July 1, 1994). Constitution of The Kingdom of Thailand, B.E. 2560 (2017). Corporate Governance Code for Listed Companies (2017). Corporations Act 2001. Federal Law No. 208-FZ of December 26, 1995, on Joint Stock Companies, art. 66 (Russ.) Financial Action Task Force. Labor Protection Act B.E. 2541 (1998). Management of Partnership Stakes and Shares of Ministers Act B.E. 2543 (2000) Ministerial Regulation On Customer Due Diligence Verification B.E. 2563 (2020) Organic Act on Anti-Corruption B.E. 2561 (2018). Public Limited Companies Act B.E. 2535 (1992). Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). Thailand Civil and Commercial Code. The Notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board No. TorJor. su/2559 regarding the application for permission and the granting of permission to offer newly issued shares (Codified Version) came into effect on November 16, 2016. United Kingdom Companies Act 2006. Cases Amgen Inc. v. Harris, 577 U.S. 308 (2016) . Biraogo v. Commission on Elections, G.R. No. 203603 (November 13, 2012) (Phil.). Re Smith v. Fawcett Ltd., Ch. 304 (1942) (Eng.). Roth v. Robertson, 64 Misc. 343, 118 N.Y.S. 351 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1909). Smith v. Van Gorkom, 488 A.2d 858, 46 A.L.R.4th 821, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P91,921 (Del. Jan. 29, 1985). The Constitutional Court Ruling No. 12-13/2551 (2008). The Constitutional Court Ruling No. 12-14/2553 (2010). The Supreme Court Judgment No. 1426/2542 (1999). The Supreme Court Judgment No. 1980/2519 (1976). The Supreme Court Judgment No. 2191/2541 (1998). The Supreme Court Judgment No. 3250/2545 (2002). Internet Sources Adesanya, Oluwaseun, Corporate Opportunity Doctrine: An Impediment to Corporate Innovation (October 10, 2023), https://ssrn.com/abstract=4597752. Allen, Franklin & Carletti, Elena & Marquez, Robert S., Stakeholder Capitalism, Corporate Governance and Firm Value (September 16, 2009), https://ssrn.com/abstract=968141. Andres Knobel, Complex Ownership Structures: Addressing the Risks for Beneficial Ownership Transparency (February 17, 2022), https://ssrn.com/abstract=4040794. Anti-Money Laundering Office (n.d.), Compliance with the Law on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering for Financial Institutions and Reporting Entities, https://cds.customs.go.th/data_files/1606141353541733167636.pdf. Apinyasakul, T., Burden of Proof on the Business Judgment Rule, Chulalongkorn University (2554), http://cuir.car.chula.ac.th/handle/123456789/30718. ASEAN Briefing, Audit and Compliance in Thailand: A Guide for Foreign Investors, (September 24, 2024), https://www.aseanbriefing.com/news/audit-and-compliance-in-thailand-a-guide-for-foreign-investors/. Asian Development Bank Institute, Corporate Governance in Family Businesses: Challenges and Opportunities, ADBI Research Paper No. 19 (November 25, 2024), https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/157194/adbi-rp19.pdf. Atchutmanas, W., Channel 3 and Surin Kritayapongphan’s Efforts to Attract a New Generation of Viewers, BBC Thai (June 4, 2022), https://www.bbc.com/thai/61688048. Bangkok Biz News, “6 Key Points Raised by Academics on Pita Limjaroenrat’s ITV Shares Case” (June 17, 2023, 11:36 AM), https://www.bangkokbiznews.com/politics/1073921. Banyong Pongpanich, The Epic of the Tom Yum Goong Crisis of 1997, https://thaipublica.org/2017/07/finiancial-crisis-2540-banyongpongpanich-89/. BBC News Thai, Summary of Pita’s Arguments and 3 Key Points from the Constitutional Court Ruling, (January 24, 2024), https://www.bbc.com/thai/articles/ cx8jlqd1p8yo. Bloomberg News, Regulator Files Fraud Charges Against Stark: Major Shareholder Vonnarat and Former Executives Named by SEC, Bangkok Post, (July 6, 2023, 3:43 PM), https://www.bangkokpost.com/business/general/2606771/sec-files-fraud-charges-against-debt-ridden-stark. Bruce Werner (2021), Revisiting the Three Circle Model of Family Business to Strengthen Governance Structures, Entrepreneurship, (February 10, 2021), https://www.financialpoise.com/three-circle-model-of-family-business/ Business Judgment Rule and Family Businesses (2020), Davis Wright Tremaine LLP (June 2020), https://www.dwt.com/blogs/family-business-resource-center/2020/06/business-judgment-rule-family-business. CFI Team (2024), Cumulative Voting, Corporate Finance Institute (October 2, 2024), https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/management/cumulative-voting/ Chaiviset, D., Partnership and Shareholding of Political Officeholders, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, https://www.parliament.go.th/ewtadmin/ewt/parliament_parcy/ ewt_dl_link.php?nid=58618&filename=house2554. (last visited September 24, 2024). Chanyanuch Worarat & Yollanda Arsyati Putri, Promoting Equality Through the Patronage System in Thailand, (December, 2018). https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/329872099_Promoting_equality_Through_the_patronage_system_in_Thailand. Charoen Pokphand Group, CP Group and the Highest Institution of Thailand, (May 9, 2019), https://www.wearecp.com/bg62-0905-00001/. China Companies Crack Down on Nepotism, Tobacco Reporter, https://tobaccoreporter.com/2023/07/17/china-companies-crack-down-on-nepotism/ (last visited October 4, 2024), Compensation Advisory Partners, The 2024 Private Company Board Compensation Survey, Private Company Director (September 2, 2024), https://www.privatecompanydirector.com/ the-2024-private-company-board-compensation-survey/. Corporate Finance Institute, Independent Director, https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/ resources/career/independent-director/ (last visited September 24, 2024) Council of Europe, Corruption Prevention and Combating Nepotism in the Public Sector, (July 2019), https://rm.coe.int/168097a4e3. CP ALL Pub. Co. Ltd., The Articles of Association of the Company, https://www.cpall.co.th/en/about-us/the-articles-of-association-of-the-company. Crispin, S.W., Thailand’s Five Families Prop and Imperil Prayut, Asia Times, AT Finance, Thailand (December 18, 2019), https://asiatimes.com/2019/12/thailands-five-families-prop-and-imperil-prayut/. Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, The Business Judgment Rule & Family Business Governance, Family Business Resource Center, (June 29, 2020), https://www.dwt.com/blogs/family-business-resource-center/2020/06/business-judgment-rule-family-business. Davis, J.A., How Three Circles Changed the Way We See Family Business, CFEG (September 2019), https://cfeg.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/How-Three-Circles-Changed-the-Way-We-See-Family-Business-1.pdf. Dovetail, What Is Direct Competition?, https://dovetail.com/market-research/direct-competition/ (last visited November 18, 2024) Dynamic Boards, Shadow Directors: What Is a Shadow Directorship? How to Avoid It, https://dynamicboards.co.uk/shadow-directors-what-is-a-shadow-directorship-how-to-avoid-it/ (last visited February 14, 2025), Eiwsriwong, N., Development of Thailand During the Era of Field Marshal Sarit Thanarat, https://www.human.cmu.ac.th/courseonline/huge/050103/pdf/patthana.pdf. (last visited October 11, 2024). ESG Lexicon, Apply or Explain, https://www.esglexicon.com/glossary/term/apply-or-explain/. (last visited November 21, 2024) European Commission (2024), Questions and Answers: Shareholder Rights Directive – Improving Corporate Governance and Shareholders’ Engagement, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/memo_17_592 (last visited November 25, 2024) European Commission, Family Business, Single Market Economy, https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/smes/sme-fundamentals/family-business_en (last visited October 25, 2024). European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Comparing the Economic Performance of Family Businesses and Non-Family Businesses, (June, 2023), https://londoneconomics.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/101-Comparing-the-economic-performance-of-family-businesses-and-non-family-businesses.pdf. FairVote, State Regulations on Cumulative Voting for Corporate Boards (October 18, 2016, archive.fairvote.org , https://archive.fairvote.org. Family Business Consulting Group, Why Would a Family Business Create a Board with Independent Directors?, The Family Business Consulting Group, https://www.thefbcg.com/resource/why-would-a-family-business-create-a-board-with-independent-directors/. (last visited November 6, 2024). Family Business United, The Fundamentals of the Three-Circle Model, https://www.familybusinessunited.com/post/the-fundamentals-of-the-three-circle-model. (last visited October 2, 2024). Financial Action Task Force, Politically Exposed Persons (Recommendations 12 and 22), (June, 2013), https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Fatfrecommendations/Peps-r12-r22.html. Financial Reporting Council (2018), UK Corporate Governance Code, https://media.frc.org.uk/documents/UK_Corporate_Governance_Code_2018.pdf (last visited October 4, 2024). Financial Reporting Council (2018b), Wates Corporate Governance Principles for Large Private Companies 4, https://www.wates.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Wates-Corporate-Governance_Screen-Dec-2018.pdf (last visited October 4, 2024). FISG: Effects on Supervisory Boards and the Composition of the Audit Committee, Oppenhoff (November 3, 2021), https://www.oppenhoff.eu/en/news/detail/fisg-effects-on-supervisory-boards-and-the-composition-of-the-audit-committee/. Forbes Thailand, The Maleenont Family, (April 3, 2020), https://forbesthailand.com/forbes-lists/thailand-richest/%E0%B8%95%E0%B8%A3% E0%B8%B0%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%B9%E0%B8%A5%E0%B8%A1%E0%B8% B2%E0%B8%A5%E0%B8%B5%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%97%E0%B9%8C. Grabowiecki, Jerzy, Keiretsu Groups: Their Role in the Japanese Economy and a Reference Point (or Paradigm) for Other Countries, (March, 2006), https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333134570_Keiretsu_Groups_Their_Role_in_the_Japanese_Economy_and_a_Reference_Point_or_Paradigm_for_Other_Countries/figures?lo=1. Gupta, Arindam and Parua, Anupam, An Enquiry into Compliance of Corporate Governance Codes by the Private Sector Indian Companies (December 18, 2006). 10th Indian Institute of Capital Markets Conference Paper, https://ssrn.com/abstract=962001 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.962001 Haider A. Khan, Corporate Governance of Family Businesses in Asia: What’s Right and What’s Wrong?, https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/ 157212/adbi-rp3.pdf (last visited August 8, 2024) International Finance Corporation, Structure and Functioning of the Board, IFC Beyond the Balance Sheet, https://www.ifcbeyondthebalancesheet.org/ about-the-toolkit/governance/structure-and-functioning-of-the-board (last visited August 20, 2024) InView, Consensus on the Comply or Explain principle, (2012), https://www.inview.nl/ document/id32da91dca8ba24321aed0083e39e32a0 Jason Gordon, Stakeholder Theory of Corporate Governance - Explained, The Business Professor, https://thebusinessprofessor.com/en_US/business-governance/stakeholder-theory-of-corporate-governance (last visited April 20, 2024) Julia Kagan, Agency Theory, Investopedia (May 9, 2023), https://www.investopedia.com/ terms/a/agencytheory.asp. Kahumbya Bashige, Board Decisions: Understanding Your Role as a Director, Institute of Directors, (July 18, 2023), https://www.iod.com/resources/company-structure/board-decisions-kahumbya-bashige/. Khan, A. H., Corporate Governance: The Limits of the Principal-Agent Approach in Light of the Family-Based Corporate Governance System in Asia, (August, 2001), https://www.cirje.e.u-tokyo.ac.jp/research/workshops/papers/khan/khan4.pdf. Khanthavit, Anya and Polsiri, Piruna and Wiwattanakantang, Yupana, Did Families Lose or Gain Control? Thai Firms after the East Asian Financial Crisis (January 2003), https://ssrn.com/abstract=370120. Kom Chad Luek, "Why Are Politicians Prohibited from Holding Media Shares?" (July 4, 2019), https://www.komchadluek.net/news/scoop/378129. KPMG, Balancing Rules and Flexibility: A Study of Corporate Governance Requirements Across 25 Markets 26, https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/ pdf/2014/12/corporate-governance-balancing-rules-and-flexibility-main-report.pdf (last visited April 20, 2024). Kritsada Suphawattanakul, ‘Prohibition of Politicians Holding Media Shares’: Legal Overreach That Solves Nothing, Prachatai (May 31, 2024), https://prachatai.com/journal/2024/05/109422. Linda Hendry, Resource Dependency Theory and Its Implications, FutureLearn, (July 2, 2024), https://www.futurelearn.com/info/courses/managing-company-culture/0/steps/216762. Live Platforms, Rights and Share Ownership in Family Businesses, (September 3, 2024), https://www.live-platforms.com/th/education/article/344-rights-share-ownership-family-business/. Longtunman, Stark Corporation’s Financial Scandal and Market Fallout, Longtunman,(June 8, 2023), https://www.longtunman.com/45717. Luther Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, Memo: A Guide for Company Directors in Thailand, (September 2021), https://www.luther-lawfirm.com/uploads/tx_fwluther/ Memo_DRAFT_Guide_on_Directors_V4.pdf. Manager Online, 50th Anniversary of Channel 3: Prachum Maleenont Announces Resignation, (March 28, 2020), https://mgronline.com/entertainment/detail/9630000031572. Marketeer Team, After “Prachum Maleenont” Hands Over Control … What to Watch for in the Next Half-Century of BEC!, Marketeer Online, (March 28, 2020), https://marketeeronline.co/archives/155088. Martin Rush, Audit Committees and Their Benefits, Accru, https://www.accru.com/blog/audit-committees-and-their-benefits/ (last visited November 13, 2024). Matichon, 30% of Family Businesses Successfully Transition to the Second Generation, and Only 3% Make It to the Fourth Generation, https://www.matichon.co.th/economy/ news_4510223?__cf_chl_tk=_sV3gq2QYEFQhJUcwSdwIxBuKUv7xfVgiVJyt2Ygpcg-1723520719-0.0.1.1-5375 (August 13, 2024). Mauro F. Guillén, The Monarchy and the Economy, Cato Unbound, (June 16, 2021), https://www.cato-unbound.org/2021/06/16/mauro-f-guillen/monarchy-economy/. McKinsey & Company, Fine-tuning Family Businesses for a New Era https://www.mckinsey.com (last visited October 11, 2024). Megan Doyle, What Is the Role of Agency Theory in Corporate Governance, Investopedia, (June 25, 2019), https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/031815/what-role-agency-theory-corporate-governance.asp. Mitigation of Nepotism through Board Independence: SEC Thailand (2017), Corporate Governance Code for Listed Companies, https://www.sec.or.th. Office of Small and Medium Enterprises Promotion, Plan and SME Promotion, https://www.sme.go.th/ (last visited August 13, 2024) Office of the National Anti-Corruption Commission (2022), Knowledge Against Corruption: Laws Concerning Conflicts Between Personal and Public Interests (Sections 126 and 127 of the NACC Act) and Penalties, https://www.nacc.go.th/categorydetail/ 20191120103452112/20221011113404 (October 15, 2024) Palmer, J., What is a Shadow Director? (Overview, Roles, and Responsibilities), OnBoard Meetings, https://www.onboardmeetings.com/blog/shadow-director/ (last visited November 14, 2024) PCAOB, Mission, Vision, and Values, Pub. Co. Accounting Oversight Bd., https://pcaobus.org/about/mission-vision-values (last visited November 14, 2024). Pimol Thammaphitakkpong, Guidelines for Promoting and Preventing Government Officials from Engaging in Conflicts of Interest in Accordance with the Rule of Law, https://www.constitutionalcourt.or.th/occ_web/ewt_dl_link.php?nid=1419 (last visited November 14, 2024). Piyaram Piyathaiseree, Adaptation Strategies by Type of Family Business Structure, Part 1, Live Platforms, https://www.live-platforms.com/th/education/article/325-type-of-family-business-structure-and-strategies/ (last visited November 25, 2024). Positioning Magazine, Opening Up: “Prachum Maleenont,” the Youngest Sibling Who Took Over the Channel 3 Empire Amidst Difficult Challenges, (February 12, 2019) https://positioningmag.com/1213537. PTT Pub. Co. Ltd., Articles of Association (Apr. 18, 2023), https://www. pttplc.com/uploads/About/เอกสารสำคัญ/Articles_of_Association_18_Apr_23.pdf. R.S. Loona, Liability of Non-Executive and Independent Directors, https://www.primedatabase.com/article/2020/Article-R.S.Loona.pdf. (last visited November 14, 2024). Republic of the Phelippines Supreme Court, Petition for Certiorari and Prohibition with Prayer for the Issuance of a Temporary Restraining Order and/or Writ of Preliminary Injunction, (November 8, 2022), https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Petition.pdf. Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI), Corporate Finance and Governance: Japan-Europe Comparisons, (2005), https://www.rieti.go.jp/en/events/ 05091301/info.html. Sarinee Achavanuntakul, Hyper-Legalism and Media Shareholding Restrictions in Thai Society, ThaiPublica (May 14, 2019), https://thaipublica.org/2019/05/hyper-legalism-and-media-shares/. Sawanit Chanthapong and Nitisarn Pongpiyapaiboon, 20 Years of the 1997 Economic Crisis: Lessons for a Balanced and Sustainable Economic Path, https://www.bot.or.th/Thai/MonetaryPolicy/ArticleAndResearch/FAQ/FAQ_115.pdf. (last visited November 21, 2024). SCB Econ. Intelligence Ctr., Family Businesses in Thailand: Major Contributors to the Economy, (December 18, 2019), https://www.scbeic.com/th/detail/product/6203. Scott, Z., The Case for Independence in Private Company Boards, https://zacharyscott.com/the-case-for-independence-in-private-company-boards/ (last visited November 21, 2024). Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Thailand (2023), SEC files a criminal complaint against 10 offenders with the DSI for falsifying STARK financial statements, making false statements in the registration statements, and acting in the manner that dishonestly deceives others, SEC News (July 6, 2023), https://www.sec.or.th/EN/Pages/News_Detail.aspx?SECID=10553&NewsNo=116&NewsYear=2023&Lang=EN. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Thailand, Corporate Governance Code 2017, https://www.sec.or.th/cgthailand/EN/pages/cgcode/cgcodeintroduction.aspx (last visited September 24, 2024). Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Thailand, Family Business Toward Public Company: Only 10% Successfully Transfer to the Third Generation (Aug. 8, 2023), https://www.set.or.th/th/about/mediacenter/insights/article/285--family-business (last visited April 29, 2025). Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Thailand, Frequently Asked Questions: Audit Committee, CG Thailand, https://www.sec.or.th/cgthailand/EN/Pages/FAQ/ACFAQ.aspx (last visited September 24, 2024). Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Thailand, Introduction to the Corporate Governance Code, CG Thailand, https://www.sec.or.th/cgthailand/TH/Pages/CGCode/ CGCodeIntroduction.aspx (last visited November 4, 2024).SET Sustainability, Role of Independent Directors in Corporate Governance, CG Today (January, 2021), https://setsustainability.com/download/p8nimwkzhy9bqje. Shareholder Derivative Lawsuits, Justia, https://www.justia.com/business-operations/business-disputes/shareholder-derivative-lawsuits/ (last visited November 25, 2024). Silpa-Mag, The Legacy and Transformation of Family Businesses in Thailand, Art & Culture Magazine, (October 22, 2018), https://www.silpa-mag.com/history/article_21586. Siriporn Sangobtham Jangtrakool, Family Businesses to Public Companies: Only 10% Successfully Transition to the Third Generation, Ass’n of Thai Investors (August 8, 2023), https://www.set.or.th/th/about/mediacenter/insights/article/285--family-business. Special Committee on the Study of the Problem of Patronage in the Thai Bureaucratic System, Addressing Patronage System Problems in the Thai Bureaucracy, National Legislative Assembly (2018), http://lib.mnre.go.th/lib/book/ooppatam.pdf. Stark, R. & Iqbal, S., Adding Independent Directors to the Board of a Family Business, Egon Zehnder, (December, 2016), https://www.egonzehnder.com/industries/family-business-advisory/insights/adding-independent-directors-to-the-board-of-a-family-business. Stock Exchange of Thailand, FAQ on THSI and Sustainability Excellence Awards, https://setsustainability.com/libraries/994/item/faq-thsi-2564. (last visited November 25, 2024). Tangkaravakoon, W., of the TOA Kingdom, related to STARK, Post Today (April 21, 2023, 2:15 PM), https://www.posttoday.com/business/stockholder/693413. The Siam Cement Pub. Co. Ltd., Notice of 2022 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders (The 29th Meeting) (Mar. 30, 2022), https://scc.listedcom/misc/shareholderMTG/agm2022/20220314-scc-agm2022-invitation-full-en.pdf. Thai PBS, End of the Case! Summary of the "Pita" ITV Shareholding Case, https://thevisual.thaipbs.or.th/data-viz/timelinepitaitv/ (last visited November 6, 2024). Thai PBS, Forbes Ranks 10 Thai Billionaires 2024: Wealth Declines by 12%, https://www.thaipbs.or.th/news/content/341692 (last visited August 13, 2024). The Delaware Way: Deference to the Business Judgment of Directors Who Act Loyally and Carefully, Del. Dep’t of State, https://corplaw.delaware.gov/delaware-way-business-judgment/ (last visited November 6, 2024). The Insider View vs. Outsider View of Corporate Governance, https://s3.studentvip.com.au/ notes/42443-sample.pdf?v=1614745688 (last visited August 8, 2024) The Investopedia Team (2024), Principal-Agent Problem Causes, Solutions, and Examples Explained, Investopedia (October 5, 2024), https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/ principal-agent-problem.asp. The Matter, “Will Pita Be Disqualified from Politics? Explaining the Media Shares Case as ITV Revives” (June 9, 2023), https://thematter.co/brief/205629/205629. The Stock Exchange of Thailand, Independent Directors and Audit Committees, (Thai.), https://media.set.or.th/set/Documents/2022/Jul/Independent_Director_and_Audit_Committee.pdf (last visited November 25, 2024). Thomson Reuters, Glossary: Double Derivative Action, https://content.next.westlaw.com/ Glossary/PracticalLaw/I1ff8dadf9c2711e9adfea82903531a62 (last visited February 13, 2025). Thunration, A., Derivative Action in Public Company, (2022), https://libdoc.dpu.ac.th/ thesis/Aunchisa.Thu.pdf. TOA Group, Company History and Development, https://www.toagroup.com/th/about-toa/company-info/company-history-and-development (last visited August 15, 2024). Tom Wixley & Geoff Everingham, Corporate Governance: An Introduction to Theory and Practice, ResearchGate (June, 2023), https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372743910_ Corporate_Governance_An_Introduction_to_Theory_and_Practice. University of London, Corporate Governance: Unit 1 Introduction to Corporate Governance, https://www.soas.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2023-01/M444_unit-01_sample.pdf (last visited August 8, 2024). Vincy Fon & Francesco Parisi, Judicial Precedents in Civil Law Systems: A Dynamic Analysis, Am. L. & Econ. Ass’n Ann. Meetings, (2005), https://law.bepress.com/alea/15th/art10. Visutiphat, C., “Who Are You in Family Business?” (March 6, 2024), https://www.live-platforms.com/th/education/article/319-who-are-you-in-family-business/. Walailak Univ. Ctr. for Econ. Studies, Presentation on Business Structures in Thailand, https://ces.wu.ac.th/news/08/n25242.pdf. (last visited August 8, 2024). Wali-ul-Maroof Matin, Corporate Governance in Family-Run Businesses in Thailand, Asian Scholarship Foundation, (2008), https://www.asianscholarship.org/asf/ejourn/articles/ maroof_m.pdf. Wattanaporn, R., Corporate Governance in Thai Family Businesses (Thai), https://cuir.car.chula.ac.th/handle/123456789/77676 (last visited November 6, 2024) WiriyaKulkit, N., Managing Shares in Family Businesses (Part 1), Money & Banking online, (November 13, 2022), https://moneyandbanking.co.th/2022/16558/. Wiwattanakantang, Yupana, Political Relationships, Global Financing, and Corporate Transparency: Evidence from Indonesia, 38 J. Fin. & Quant. Analysis 1595 (2003), https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223871705_Political_Relationships_Global_Financing_and_Corporate_Transparency_Evidence_from_Indonesia. Worarat, C. & Arsyati Putri, Y., Promoting Equality Through the Patronage System in Thailand, (December 2018), https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Yollanda-Putri/publication/329872099_Promoting_equality_Through_the_patronage_system_in_Thailand/links/5c1e598992851c22a33fc8fb/Promoting-equality-Through-the-patronage-system-in-Thailand. Working Group at the Securities and Exchange Commission of Thailand (SEC), Study on Enhancing Good Corporate Governance of Listed Companies in Thailand, (2018), https://www.sec.or.th/TH/Documents/Research/research-0442-CG.pdf. Working Group Established by the Office of the SEC, Study on Enhancing Good Corporate Governance of Listed Companies in Thailand, (2019), https://www.sec.or.th/TH/Documents/AboutUs/cgsec.pdf. Yutth Vorachattara, Board Size: How Many Members Should a Company Have? (Part 2), Investment Guide, (September, 2021), https://setsustainability.com/download/ 3akboh5sirp1nj7. Research/Working Papers Apichaya Toovichean, Transgenerational Problems of Thai Family Business in Tourism and Hospitality Industry (Master of Management thematic paper, Mahidol University 2017). Becht, Marco, Patrick Bolton, and Ailsa Röell. Corporate Governance and Control (National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 9371 2002). Claessens, Stijn, Simeon Djankov, Joseph P.H. Fan, and Larry H.P. Lang, Corporate Diversification in East Asia: The Role of Ultimate Ownership and Group Affiliation, (The World Bank, Working Paper 1999). Itthiwut Saengratanadej, Derivative Actions in Respect of Listed Companies, (LL.M. thesis, Chulalongkorn University 2016). Jatejumnongjit, B., The Protection for Minority Shareholders in a Limited Company (LL.M. thesis, Chulalongkorn University 1999). Jeroen Verbruggen, Corporate Governance Within Family-Owned Businesses: How Corporate Governance is Organized Within Family-Owned Businesses, (M.Sc. thesis, Wageningen Univ. 2012). Jonathan M. Karpoff, The Impact of Corporate Governance on Firm Performance: A Meta-Analysis (European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI) Law Working Paper No. 515/2020). Levine, R., Bank-Based or Market-Based Financial Systems: Which Is Better?, (NBER Working Paper No. 9138 2002). Natthaphong Chumpadaeng, Directors’ Diversion of Corporate Opportunity: A Study on Listed Company (Master of Laws thesis, Faculty of Law,Thammasat Univ. 2015). Noppadon Pakonnimiddee, The Application of Good Governance Principle to Develop Limited Company Law in Thailand (Doctoral dissertation, National Institute of Development Administration 2021). Noppadon Pakonnimiddee, The Application of Good Governance Principle to Develop Limited Company Law in Thailand (LL.D. dissertation, Doctor of Laws 2021)) Seidl D., Sanderson P. & Roberts, J., Applying ‘Comply-or-Explain’: Conformance with Codes of Corporate Governance in the UK and Germany, Ctr. for Bus. Rsch. (Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge Working Paper No. 389 2009). Supansa Chirachotkachonkun, Legal Problems Regarding Corporate Governance Measures Within Respect to The Securities and Exchange Act (No. 4) B.E. 2551: Study on Directors’ Duties and Liabilities (LL.M. thesis, Chulalongkorn University 2008). Supansa Chitdechagul, Certain Legal Issues Concerning Measures to Promote and Oversee Activities in Accordance with the Securities and Exchange Act (4th ed.) B.E. 2551: A Case Study on Duties and Liabilities of Directors (Master’s thesis, Faculty of Law, Chulalongkorn University 2008). Sutin Chotisingha, Status, Power, Duties and Responsibilities of Executive Directors and Non-Executive Directors (LL.M. thesis, Chulalongkorn University 2001). Thanyaporn Phulsiri, The Relationship Between Family-Owned Business Structures, Accounting Valuation, and Corporate Governance Scores in Thailand: A Case Study of Listed Companies on the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) (M.M. thesis, College of Management, Mahidol University 2023). Tharatip Piyathiansawat, Legal Liability of Shadow Directors in Limited Companies: A Study of Conflicts of Interest (Master’s thesis, DPU University, n.d.) Viktor Dahlberg, Overcoming the Business Judgment Presumption in American Corporation Law: An Analysis of the Business Judgment Rule and its Raison d’être (Master’s thesis, School of Economics and Commercial Law, Göteborg University 2008). M. Matyja and M. Rajchelt-Zublewicz, The Impact of Chain of Command in an Organization,” in Sustainable Economic Development and Advancing Education Excellence in the era of Global Pandemic. Proceedings of the 36th International Business Information Management Association Conference (IBIMA), 360-370, (2020). John Wood & Thames Fulton, Independent Directors for a Family Business (Heidrick & Struggles Governance Letter, First Quarter 2011) Khamin Phipatseritham & Kenzaburo Yoshihara, Business Groups in Thailand (Inst. of Southeast Asian Studies, Research Notes & Discussion Paper No. 41 1983). Letter of Internal Inquiry Response Regarding Directors of Public Limited Companies from Business Registration Division 2, Department of Business Development, No. PorNor 0605/1052. Navapol Viriyakulkij, Family Constitution Course Lecture Notes (September 2022). Banyat Nitithanavarn, Lecture Materials for Course on Democratic Principles for Thai Citizens, National Institute of Development Administration (May 6, 2014). Bernard S. Black, The Principal Fiduciary Duties of Boards of Directors, Presentation at Third Asian Roundtable on Corporate Governance, Singapore (April 4, 2001). Phongthorn Bunkanwanich & Yupana Wiwattanakantang, Big Business Owners in Politics (unpublished manuscript 2008). Qiuye Wei, An Analysis and Study of the Duty of Loyalty of Directors under the Company Law of the People’s Republic of China (Master’s independent study manuscript, Faculty of Law, Chulalongkorn University 2022). Sigurt Vitols, The Origins of Bank-Based and Market-Based Financial Systems: Germany, Japan, and the United States (Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung Discussion Paper 2001). | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97383 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 近年來，公司治理在商業領域的重要性日益增加。世界各地的許多司法管轄領域上已經開始加強公司治理的法律、監管和制度框架。健全的實踐公司治理被認為能夠通過促進合規、道德行為、增加透明度和企業問責制，有效降低企業面臨的法律和聲譽風險。
在泰國，家族企業構成了經濟結構的主體，從微型、小型和中型企業（MSMEs）到公開發行和上市公司。然而，傳統做法仍然給公司治理帶來挑戰。泰國家族企業內部的裙帶關係往往導致透明度缺失和關鍵人員的不稱職，進而引發信義義務問題。集中的所有權使得控制家族能輕易侵占小股東的利益。 此外，庇護關係在泰國家族企業中提供特權方面仍然十分普遍，並在家族企業的運作和資源分配上發揮著重要作用。商業中的政治參與往往會削弱公司治理的基本原則，例如透明度、問責性、公平性和效率，尤其是在大型企業和企業集團中，這些影響進一步導致治理結構的複雜化和利益衝突的增加。 近年來，泰國證券交易委員會及政府一直致力於通過法律法規和公司治理準則來維護和發展公司治理。然而，這些法規主要針對公開發行公司，尤其是上市公司。對於 MSMEs，公司治理的規定非常有限，現有法規也未能充分應對裙帶關係、信義義務以及政治參與所帶來的挑戰。因此，這些問題在泰國家族企業中依然普遍存在，且缺乏足夠的法律機制來改善公司治理。 本論文將深入探討公司治理，特別關注泰國家族企業所面臨的挑戰。它將考察導致這些挑戰的文化和傳統因素，並分析現有的泰國法律法規如何解決裙帶關係、信義義務義務和庇護問題。論文將提出法律發展建議，以應對這些問題，並強調需要根據泰國的社會文化和傳統，為家族企業量身打造適合的公司治理機制。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In recent years, corporate governance has become increasingly important in the business landscape. Many jurisdictions worldwide have started to enhance their legal, regulatory and institutional frameworks for corporate governance. Robust corporate governance practices are believed to mitigate business, legal, and reputational risks by ensuring compliance, ethical behavior, transparency, and accountability.
In Thailand, family-owned businesses constitute the majority of the economic landscape, ranging from micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) to public and listed companies. However, challenges remain due to traditional practices that undermine corporate governance. Nepotism within Thai family businesses often results in a lack of transparency and incompetence among key individuals, leading to fiduciary duty issues. Concentrated ownership allows controlling families to easily expropriate the rights of minority shareholders. Moreover, patronage plays a significant role in providing privileges to family firms in Thailand. Political involvement in business compromises the fundamental principles of corporate governance—such as transparency, accountability, fairness, and efficiency—particularly in large enterprises and conglomerates. In recent years, the Securities and Exchange Commission of Thailand and the government have been striving to uphold and develop corporate governance through legal regulations and the corporate governance code. However, these regulations predominantly apply to public limited companies, especially listed companies. Provisions for corporate governance in MSMEs are scarce, and existing regulations do not adequately address challenges related to nepotism, fiduciary duties, and political involvement. Consequently, these issues persist without sufficient legal mechanisms to enhance corporate governance in Thai family businesses. This thesis will explore corporate governance in depth, focusing on the challenges faced by family-owned businesses in Thailand. It will examine the cultural and traditional factors contributing to these challenges and analyze existing Thai legal regulations that address issues of nepotism, fiduciary duties, and patronage. The thesis will propose legal developments to address these problems, emphasizing the need to tailor corporate governance mechanisms to the specific cultural and traditional contexts of Thai family businesses. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-05-22T16:09:04Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-05-22T16:09:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Contents
摘要 i Abstract iii Contents v Chapter 1: Introduction 1 1.1 Objective of the Study 1 1.2 Scope and Limitations of the Study 2 1.3 Layout of the Thesis 4 Chapter 2: An Overview of Corporate Governance: Definitions, Principles, Theoretical Perspectives, Structures, and the Board of Directors 6 2.1 Definition of Corporate Governance 6 2.2 Guiding Principles of Corporate Governance 9 2.3 Corporate Governance and Relevant Theories 11 2.3.1 The Agency Theory 11 2.3.2 The Management Theory 12 2.3.3 The Resource Dependency Theory 13 2.3.4 The Stakeholders Approach 14 2.3.5 General Analysis of Theories 15 2.4 General Corporate Governance Structure 17 2.4.1 The Chain of Command Theory 17 2.4.2 Systems of Corporate Governance 19 2.5 The Board of Directors (BOD) 23 2.5.1 Board of Directors Systems 23 2.5.2 Responsibilities of the Board of Directors (BOD) 29 2.6 Conclusion of the Chapter 35 Chapter 3: Family-Owned Businesses: Overview, Structure and Thailand Family Firms Landscape 37 3.1 Definition of Family-Owned Businesses 37 3.2 Structure of General Family-Owned Businesses: The Three-Circle Model 41 3.3 Family-Owned Businesses Development: The Three-Dimensional Model 44 3.4 Differences between FBs and NFBs 46 3.5 Performance in FBs: Analysis of the Agency Theory, SEW, the BAM, the Management Theory and Resource-Based Theory (RBT) 50 3.6 Thailand Family-Owned Businesses 53 3.6.1 The Overview, Cultural Context and Index of Thailand Family-Owned Businesses 53 3.6.2 Shareholding Structures in Thai Family Businesses 62 3.6.3 Major Problems Facing in Thailand Family-Owned Businesses 64 3.7 Conclusion of the Chapter 76 Chapter 4: Thailand’s Regulatory Framework on Corporate Governance: Addressing Nepotism, Fiduciary Duties, and Patronage Challenges 77 4.1 Nepotism in Thai Corporate Governance 78 4.1.1 Thailand Civil and Commercial Code 78 4.1.2 Public Limited Companies Act B.E. 2535 (1992) 80 4.1.3 The Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) 83 4.1.4 Corporate Governance Code for listed companies (2017) 88 4.1.5 Conclusion: Regulatory Approaches to Nepotism 92 4.2 Challenge of Breach of Fiduciary Duties 92 4.2.1 Thailand Civil and Commercial Code (CCC) 93 4.2.2 Public Limited Companies Act B.E. 2535 (1992) 100 4.2.3 The Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) 112 4.2.4 Corporate Governance Code for listed companies (2017) 124 4.2.5 Conclusion: Regulatory Approaches to Challenge of Breach of Fiduciary Duties 125 4.3 Patronage: Political Involvement in Family Businesses 127 4.3.1 Constitution of The Kingdom of Thailand 128 4.3.2 The Organic Act on Anti-Corruption B.E. 2561 (2018) 131 4.3.3 The Ministerial Regulation on Customer Due Diligence Verification B.E. 2563 (2020) 134 4.4 Implications of Thai Law for Corporate Governance in Thai Family Businesses 135 4.4.1 Nepotism in Thai Family Businesses 135 4.4.2 Breach of Fiduciary Duties Challenge 139 4.4.3 Patronage Challenge: Political Intervention 149 4.5 Conclusion of the Chapter 153 Chapter 5: Legal Analysis and Recommendations for Enhancing Corporate Governance in Thai Family Businesses 155 5.1 Legal Analysis and Recommendations to Address Nepotism in Thai Corporate Governance 155 5.1.1 Inclusion of Independent Directors (IDs) and Audit Committees (ACs) in Family Businesses 155 5.1.2 Recruitment Regulations: Merit-Based Hiring Policy 160 5.1.3 Recruitment Regulations: Anti-Nepotism Policies 166 5.1.4 Optimal Number of Board Members 169 5.1.5 Director Selection and Appointment Procedures 171 5.2 Legal Analysis and Recommendations to Address Fiduciary Duties Challenge 175 5.2.1 Duty of Care 175 5.2.2 Duty of Loyalty 191 5.2.3 Imposing Fiduciary Duties on Shadow Directors, De Facto Directors and Executives 201 5.2.4 Introducing a Provision Prohibiting the Exploitation of Familial Relationships to Harm Company Interests in the Thai Corporate Governance Code 205 5.3 Legal Analysis and Recommendations to Address Patronage Challenge 208 5.3.1 Analysis of Political Dynasties, Patronage, and Political Intervention in Constitutional Frameworks 208 5.3.2 Analysis of Political Intervention Challenge in The Organic Act on Anti-Corruption B.E. 2561 (2018) Framework 211 5.4 Conclusion of the Chapter 214 Chapter 6: Conclusion 216 Bibliography 223 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject | 家族擁有企業 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 問責制 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 董事會 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 公司法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 集中所有權 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 利益衝突 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 公司治理 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 公司治理準則 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 家族 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 家族企業 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 家族公司 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 信義義務 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 法律改革 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 大股東 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 小股東 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 任人唯親 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 庇護關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 泰國 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 泰國商業文化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 透明度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Board of Directors | en |
| dc.subject | Concentrated Ownership | en |
| dc.subject | Conflict of Interest | en |
| dc.subject | Corporate Governance | en |
| dc.subject | Corporate Governance Code | en |
| dc.subject | Family | en |
| dc.subject | Family Businesses | en |
| dc.subject | Family Firms | en |
| dc.subject | Family-Owned Businesses | en |
| dc.subject | Fiduciary Duties | en |
| dc.subject | Legal Reform | en |
| dc.subject | Majority Shareholders | en |
| dc.subject | Minority Shareholders | en |
| dc.subject | Nepotism | en |
| dc.subject | Patronage | en |
| dc.subject | Thailand | en |
| dc.subject | Thai Business Culture | en |
| dc.subject | Transparency | en |
| dc.subject | Accountability | en |
| dc.subject | Company Law | en |
| dc.title | 國家族企業的公司治理：泰國法律下的裙帶關係、 受託義務與庇護問題之法律分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Corporate Governance in Thai Family-Owned Businesses: A Legal Analysis of Nepotism, Fiduciary Duties, and Patronage Challenges under Thai Law | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 楊岳平;陳盈如 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Yueh-Ping Yang;Sherry-Y Chen | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 問責制,董事會,公司法,集中所有權,利益衝突,公司治理,公司治理準則,家族,家族企業,家族公司,家族擁有企業,信義義務,法律改革,大股東,小股東,任人唯親,庇護關係,泰國,泰國商業文化,透明度, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Accountability,Board of Directors,Company Law,Concentrated Ownership,Conflict of Interest,Corporate Governance,Corporate Governance Code,Family,Family Businesses,Family Firms,Family-Owned Businesses,Fiduciary Duties,Legal Reform,Majority Shareholders,Minority Shareholders,Nepotism,Patronage,Thailand,Thai Business Culture,Transparency, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 248 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202500899 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-05-06 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 法律學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 法律學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | N/A | - |
| Appears in Collections: | 法律學系 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf Restricted Access | 2.1 MB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.