請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96961完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 岳修平 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Hsiu-Ping Yueh | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 林廣琦 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Kuang-Chi Lin | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-25T16:14:48Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-02-26 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-02-25 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-02-13 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Alves, S. F., Shao, M., & Nejat, G. (2019, May). A socially assistive robot to facilitate and assess exercise goals. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference of Robotics and Automation Workshop on Mobile Robot Assistants for the Elderly, Montreal, QC, Canada (pp. 20-24).
Asgharian, P., Panchea, A. M., & Ferland, F. (2022). A review on the use of mobile service robots in elderly care. Robotics, 11(6), 127. Baisch, S., Kolling, T., Schall, A., Rühl, S., Selic, S., Kim, Z., ... & Knopf, M. (2017). Acceptance of social robots by elder people: does psychosocial functioning matter?. International Journal of Social Robotics, 9, 293-307. Becker, M., Mahr, D., & Odekerken-Schröder, G. (2023). Customer comfort during service robot interactions. Service Business, 17(1), 137-165. Bellas, A., Perrin, S., Malone, B., Rogers, K., Lucas, G., Phillips, E., ... & de Visser, E. (2020, April). Rapport building with social robots as a method for improving mission debriefing in human-robot teams. In 2020 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS) (pp. 160-163). IEEE. Blasco, R., Blanco, T., Marco, A., Berbegal, A., & Casas, R. (2014). Needs identification methodology for inclusive design. Behaviour & Information Technology, (just-accepted), 1-36. Breazeal, C. L., Ostrowski, A. K., Singh, N., & Park, H. W. (2019). Designing social robots for older adults. Natl. Acad. Eng. Bridge, 49, 22-31. Broekens, J., Heerink, M., & Rosendal, H. (2009). Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review. Gerontechnology, 8(2), 94-103. Bronstein, I., Nelson, N., Livnat, Z., & Ben-Ari, R. (2012). Rapport in negotiation: The contribution of the verbal channel. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 56(6), 1089-1115. Čaić, M., Avelino, J., Mahr, D., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Bernardino, A. (2020). Robotic versus human coaches for active aging: An automated social presence perspective. International Journal of Social Robotics, 12(4), 867-882. Carré, A., Stefaniak, N., d'Ambrosio, F., Bensalah, L., & Besche-Richard, C. (2013). The Basic Empathy Scale in adults (BES-A): factor structure of a revised form. Psychological assessment, 25(3), 679. Carros, F., Meurer, J., Löffler, D., Unbehaun, D., Matthies, S., Koch, I., ... & Wulf, V. (2020, April). Exploring human-robot interaction with the elderly: results from a ten-week case study in a care home. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-12). Chen Hsieh, J. (2021). Digital storytelling outcomes and emotional experience among Middle School EFL Learners: Robot‐assisted versus powerpoint‐assisted mode. TESOL Quarterly, 55(3), 994–1010. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3043 Chen, S. C., Moyle, W., Jones, C., & Petsky, H. (2020). A social robot intervention on depression, loneliness, and quality of life for Taiwanese older adults in long-term care. International psychogeriatrics, 32(8), 981-991. Coşar, S., Fernandez-Carmona, M., Agrigoroaie, R., Pages, J., Ferland, F., Zhao, F., ... & Tapus, A. (2020). ENRICHME: Perception and Interaction of an Assistive Robot for the Elderly at Home. International Journal of Social Robotics, 12, 779-805. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340. De Graaf, M. M., & Allouch, S. B. (2013). Exploring influencing variables for the acceptance of social robots. Robotics and autonomous systems, 61(12), 1476-1486. Dogra, S., Dunstan, D. W., Sugiyama, T., Stathi, A., Gardiner, P. A., & Owen, N. (2022). Active aging and public health: evidence, implications, and opportunities. Annual review of public health, 43, 439-459. Erel, H., Carsenti, E., & Zuckerman, O. (2022, March). A carryover effect in HRI: beyond direct social effects in human-robot interaction. In 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 342-352). IEEE. Erel, H., Cohen, Y., Shafrir, K., Levy, S. D., Vidra, I. D., Shem Tov, T., & Zuckerman, O. (2021, March). Excluded by robots: Can robot-robot-human interaction lead to ostracism?. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 312-321). Fasola, J., & Mataric, M. J. (2010, September). Robot exercise instructor: A socially assistive robot system to monitor and encourage physical exercise for the elderly. In 19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication (pp. 416-421). IEEE. Fasola, J., & Mataric, M. J. (2012). Using socially assistive human–robot interaction to motivate physical exercise for older adults. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100(8), 2512-2526. Fisk, A. D., Czaja, S. J., Rogers, W. A., Charness, N., & Sharit, J. (2020). Designing for older adults: Principles and creative human factors approaches. CRC press. Gamborino, E., Yueh, H. P., Lin, W., Yeh, S. L., & Fu, L. C. (2019, October). Mood estimation as a social profile predictor in an autonomous, multi-session, emotional support robot for children. In 2019 28th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. Glazier, R. A. (2016). Building rapport to improve retention and success in online classes. Journal of Political Science Education, 12(4), 437-456. Goda, A., Shimura, T., Murata, S., Kodama, T., Nakano, H., & Ohsugi, H. (2023). Effects of Robot-Assisted Activity Using a Communication Robot on Neurological Activity in Older Adults with and without Cognitive Decline. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(14), 4818. Görer, B., Salah, A. A., & Akın, H. L. (2017). An autonomous robotic exercise tutor for elderly people. Autonomous Robots, 41(3), 657-678. Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (2003). A Very Brief Measure of the Big Five Personality Domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504-528. Gratch, J., Wang, N., Gerten, J., Fast, E., & Duffy, R. (2007). Creating rapport with virtual agents. In Intelligent Virtual Agents: 7th International Conference, IVA 2007 Paris, France, September 17-19, 2007 Proceedings 7 (pp. 125-138). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Gremler, D. D., & Gwinner, K. P. (2000). Customer-employee rapport in service relationships. Journal of service research, 3(1), 82-104. Hancock, P. A., Billings, D. R., Schaefer, K. E., Chen, J. Y., De Visser, E. J., & Parasuraman, R. (2011). A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. Human Factors, 53(5), 517-527. Harrington, C. N., & Egede, L. (2023, April). Trust, comfort and relatability: Understanding black older adults’ perceptions of chatbot design for health information seeking. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-18). Hwang, J., Kim, H., Joo, K. H., & Lee, W. S. (2022). How to form rapport with information providers in the airport industry: service robots versus human staff. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 27(8), 891-906. HUANG, T. X., ISHI, H., SATO-SHIMOKAWARA, E., & YAMAGUCHI, T. (2022). Observation of Robots with Different Expressions on Education Application Towards Entrainment Robots. Journal of Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Intelligent Informatics, 34(1), 522-526. Huisman, C., & Kort, H. (2019, February). Two-year use of care robot Zora in Dutch nursing homes: An evaluation study. In Healthcare (Vol. 7, No. 1, p. 31). MDPI. Hung, L., Liu, C., Woldum, E., Au-Yeung, A., Berndt, A., Wallsworth, C., ... & Chaudhury, H. (2019). The benefits of and barriers to using a social robot PARO in care settings: a scoping review. BMC geriatrics, 19, 1-10. Hwang, J., & Lee, J. (2019). Relationships among senior tourists’ perceptions of tour guides’ professional competencies, rapport, satisfaction with the guide service, tour satisfaction, and word of mouth. Journal of Travel Research, 58(8), 1331-1346. Hyun, S. S., & Kim, I. (2014). Identifying optimal rapport-building behaviors in inducing patrons’ emotional attachment in luxury restaurants. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 38(2), 162-198. Irfan, B., Céspedes, N., Casas, J., Senft, E., Gutiérrez, L. F., Rincon-Roncancio, M., ... & Múnera, M. (2023). Personalised socially assistive robot for cardiac rehabilitation: Critical reflections on long-term interactions in the real world. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 33(2), 497-544. Irfan, B., Ramachandran, A., Spaulding, S., Glas, D. F., Leite, I., & Koay, K. L. (2019, March). Personalization in long-term human-robot interaction. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 685-686). IEEE. Jecker, N. S. (2021). You’ve got a friend in me: sociable robots for older adults in an age of global pandemics. Ethics and Information Technology, 23(Suppl 1), 35-43. Kim, H., So, K. K. F., & Wirtz, J. (2022). Service robots: Applying social exchange theory to better understand human–robot interactions. Tourism Management, 92, 104537. Khaksar, S. M. S., Khosla, R., Chu, M. T., & Shahmehr, F. S. (2016). Service innovation using social robot to reduce social vulnerability among older people in residential care facilities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 113, 438-453. Kont, M., & Alimardani, M. (2020). Engagement and mind perception within human-robot interaction: A comparison between elderly and young adults. In Social Robotics: 12th International Conference, ICSR 2020, Golden, CO, USA, November 14–18, 2020, Proceedings 12 (pp. 344-356). Springer International Publishing. Krämer, N. C., Lucas, G., Schmitt, L., & Gratch, J. (2018). Social snacking with a virtual agent–On the interrelation of need to belong and effects of social responsiveness when interacting with artificial entities. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 109, 112-121. Lane, G. W., Noronha, D., Rivera, A., Craig, K., Yee, C., Mills, B., & Villanueva, E. (2016). Effectiveness of a social robot,“Paro,” in a VA long-term care setting. Psychological services, 13(3), 292. Lee, C. S., Wang, M. H., Kuan, W. K., Ciou, Z. H., Tsai, Y. L., Chang, W. S., ... & Yamaguchi, T. (2020, September). A study on AI-FML robotic agent for student learning behavior ontology construction. In 2020 International Symposium on Community-centric Systems (CcS) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. Lee, O. E., Lee, H., Park, A., & Choi, N. G. (2024). My precious friend: Human-robot interactions in home care for socially isolated older adults. Clinical Gerontologist, 47(1), 161-170. Lehto, P. (2017). Robots with and for the elderly people: case study based on action research. Lin, W., Chen, H. C., & Yueh, H. P. (2021). Using different error handling strategies to facilitate older users’ interaction with chatbots in learning information and communication technologies. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 785815. Lin, W., Yueh, H. P., Wu, H. Y., & Fu, L. C. (2014). Developing a service robot for a children's library: A design‐based research approach. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(2), 290-301. Lotfi, A., Langensiepen, C., & Yahaya, S. W. (2018). Socially assistive robotics: Robot exercise trainer for older adults. Technologies, 6(1), 32. Louie, W. Y. G., & Nejat, G. (2020). A social robot learning to facilitate an assistive group-based activity from non-expert caregivers. International Journal of Social Robotics, 12(5), 1159-1176. Lubold, N., Walker, E., & Pon-Barry, H. (2021). Effects of adapting to user pitch on rapport perception, behavior, and state with a social robotic learning companion. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 31, 35-73. Martinez-Martin, E., & Cazorla, M. (2019). A socially assistive robot for elderly exercise promotion. IEEE Access, 7, 75515-75529. Mongile, S., Pusceddu, G., Cocchella, F., Lastrico, L., Belgiovine, G., Tanevska, A., ... & Sciutti, A. (2023, March). What if a Social Robot Excluded You? Using a Conversational Game to Study Social Exclusion in Teen-robot Mixed Groups. In Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 208-212). Nguyen, T. X. H., Tran, T. B. N., Dao, T. B., Barysheva, G., Nguyen, C. T., Nguyen, A. H., & Lam, T. S. (2022). Elderly People’s Adaptation to the Evolving Digital Society: A Case Study in Vietnam. Social Sciences (Basel), 11(8), 324-. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11080324 Nomura, T., Kanda, T., Suzuki, T., & Kato, K. (2004, September). Psychology in human-robot communication: An attempt through investigation of negative attitudes and anxiety toward robots. In RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication (IEEE catalog No. 04TH8759) (pp. 35-40). IEEE. Nomura, T., Suzuki, T., Kanda, T., & Kato, K. (2006). Measurement of negative attitudes toward robots. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, 7(3), 437-454. Nomura, T., & Kanda, T. (2016). Rapport–expectation with a robot scale. International Journal of Social Robotics, 8, 21-30. Oen, M. F. S. (2024). Chit Chat with Robots: Assesing the Impact of Rapport-Building on Trust in a Trust Game Setting. Ostrowski, A. K., Breazeal, C., & Park, H. W. (2022, March). Mixed-method long-term robot usage: Older adults' lived experience of social robots. In 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 33-42). IEEE. Paterson, M. (2023). Social robots and the futures of affective touch. The Senses and Society, 1-16. Petrie, H., & Edwards, A. (2006). Inclusive design and assistive technology as part of the HCI curriculum. In Proceedings of HCI Educators Workshop (Vol. 2006, pp. 23-24). Piasek, J., & Wieczorowska-Tobis, K. (2018, July). Acceptance and long-term use of a social robot by elderly users in a domestic environment. In 2018 11th international conference on human system interaction (HSI) (pp. 478-482). IEEE. Pitula, K., & Radhakrishnan, T. (2007). A conceptual model of inclusive technology for Information access by the rural sector. In Universal Acess in Human Computer Interaction. Coping with Diversity: 4th International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction, UAHCI 2007, Held as Part of HCI International 2007, Beijing, China, July 22-27, 2007, Proceedings, Part I 4 (pp. 243-252). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Pitula, K., & Radhakrishnan, T. (2007, August). A framework and process for designing inclusive technology. In International Conference on Software Engineering Advances (ICSEA 2007) (pp. 64-64). IEEE. Pütten, A. R. V. D., & Bock, N. (2018). Development and validation of the self-efficacy in human-robot-interaction scale (se-hri). ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI), 7(3), 1-30. Qiu, H., Li, M., Shu, B., & Bai, B. (2020). Enhancing hospitality experience with service robots: The mediating role of rapport building. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 29(3), 247-268. Rama, M. D., de Ridder, H., & Bouma, H. (2001). Technology generation and age in using layered user interfaces. Gerontechnology. Rantanen, T., Lehto, P., Vuorinen, P., & Coco, K. (2018). Attitudes towards care robots among Finnish home care personnel–a comparison of two approaches. Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 32(2), 772-782. Sabelli, A. M., Kanda, T., & Hagita, N. (2011, March). A conversational robot in an elderly care center: an ethnographic study. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction (pp. 37-44). Schaefer, K. E. (2016). Measuring trust in human-robot interactions: Development of the “trust perception scale-HRI”. In Robust Intelligence and Trust in Autonomous Systems (pp. 191-218). Boston, MA: Springer US. Seo, S. H., Griffin, K., Young, J. E., Bunt, A., Prentice, S., & Loureiro-Rodríguez, V. (2018). Investigating people’s rapport building and hindering behaviors when working with a collaborative robot. International Journal of Social Robotics, 10(1), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-017-0441-8 Shao, M., Pham-Hung, M., Alves, S. F. D. R., Snyder, M., Eshaghi, K., Benhabib, B., & Nejat, G. (2023). Long-Term Exercise Assistance: Group and One-on-One Interactions between a Social Robot and Seniors. Robotics, 12(1), 9. Su, Z., Sheng, W., Yang, G., Bishop, A., & Carlson, B. (2022). Adaptation of a robotic dialog system for medication reminder in elderly care. Smart Health, 26, 100346. Syrdal, D. S., Dautenhahn, K., Koay, K. L., & Walters, M. L. (2009). The negative attitudes towards robots scale and reactions to robot behaviour in a live human-robot interaction study. Adaptive and emergent behaviour and complex systems. Takanokura, M., Kurashima, R., Ohhira, T., Kawahara, Y., & Ogiya, M. (2021). Implementation and user acceptance of social service robot for an elderly care program in a daycare facility. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 1-10. Taylor, L., Downing, A., Noury, G. A., Masala, G., Palomino, M., McGinn, C., & Jones, R. (2021, August). Exploring the applicability of the socially assistive robot Stevie in a day center for people with dementia. In 2021 30th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) (pp. 957-962). IEEE. Takayanagi, K., Kirita, T., & Shibata, T. (2014). Comparison of verbal and emotional responses of elderly people with mild/moderate dementia and those with severe dementia in responses to seal robot, PARO. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 6, 257. Tickle-Degnen, L., & Rosenthal, R. (1990). The nature of rapport and its nonverbal correlates. Psychological inquiry, 1(4), 285-293. Ullman, D., & Malle, B. F. (2018, March 05-08). What does it mean to trust a robot?: Steps Toward a Multidimensional Measure of Trust [Paper presentation]. Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Chicago, IL, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173386.3176991 Wang, N., & Gratch, J. (2009, September). Rapport and facial expression. In 2009 3rd International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and Workshops (pp. 1-6). IEEE. Webkamigad, S., Rowe, R., Peltier, S., Froehlich Chow, A., McGilton, K. S., & Walker, J. D. (2020). Identifying and understanding the health and social care needs of indigenous older adults with multiple chronic conditions and their caregivers: A scoping review. BMC Geriatrics, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01552-5 Williams, K. D., Cheung, C. K., & Choi, W. (2000). Cyberostracism: effects of being ignored over the Internet. Journal of personality and social psychology, 79(5), 748. Wilson, J. R., Lee, N. Y., Saechao, A., Hershenson, S., Scheutz, M., & Tickle-Degnen, L. (2017). Hand gestures and verbal acknowledgments improve human-robot rapport. In Social Robotics: 9th International Conference, ICSR 2017, Tsukuba, Japan, November 22-24, 2017, Proceedings 9 (pp. 334-344). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70022-9_33 Wu, Y. H., Wrobel, J., Cornuet, M., Kerhervé, H., Damnée, S., & Rigaud, A. S. (2014). Acceptance of an assistive robot in older adults: a mixed-method study of human–robot interaction over a 1-month period in the Living Lab setting. Clinical interventions in aging, 801-811. Venkatesh, V.,Davis, F. D.(2000).A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science.46(2),186-204. Venkatesh, V.,Bala, H.(2008).Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decision Sciences.39(2),273-315. Yu, S., & Chen, T. (2024). Understanding older adults’ acceptance of Chatbots in healthcare delivery: an extended UTAUT model. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 1435329. Yueh, H. P., Hsu, L. J., & Lin, W. (2022, June). Let the Camera Eat First? Engaging the Older Adults’ Reflection and Sharing About Food Photograph to Enhance Wellbeing. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 461-471). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Yueh, H. P., & Lin, W. (2013). The interaction between human and the home service robot on a daily life cycle. In Cross-Cultural Design. Cultural Differences in Everyday Life: 5th International Conference, CCD 2013, Held as Part of HCI International 2013, Las Vegas, NV, USA, July 21-26, 2013, Proceedings, Part II 5 (pp. 175-181). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Yueh, H. P., Lin, W., Wang, S. C., & Fu, L. C. (2020). Reading with robot and human companions in library literacy activities: A comparison study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(5), 1884-1900. Zheng, Y. L., Rau, P. L. P., Yueh, H. P., Chen, P. H., & Huang, D. L. (2018). An Exploratory Study on Design and Implement an Emotional Karaoke Robot (EKR). In Cross-Cultural Design. Methods, Tools, and Users: 10th International Conference, CCD 2018, Held as Part of HCI International 2018, Las Vegas, NV, USA, July 15-20, 2018, Proceedings, Part I 10 (pp. 269-282). Springer International Publishing. 王怡仁. (2023). 透過社會互動遊戲快速建立人機投契之初探研究. 國立臺灣大學心理學系學位論文, 2023, 1-59. 何文祺.(2021). 機器人服務導入高齡者學習健康素養之研究. 國立雲林科技大學工業設計系學位論文, 2021, 1-91 許紋華. (2021). 運用 AI 機器人提升親子館親子互動關係之探究. 兒童照顧與教育, (9), 29-52. 陳家荷 (2023). 非口語話輪輪轉線索應用於高齡者與機器人休閒對話情境之研究. 國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學系學位論文, 2023, 1-123. 智慧醫療創新中心. (2024, December 16). 「凱比」機器人上工！新竹臺大開啟智慧醫療新篇章. 臺大醫院新竹分院 智慧醫療創新中心. https://www.hch.gov.tw/?aid=71&pid=106&page_name=detail&iid=673 團康輔導社. (2012). 最新團康遊戲大全. 文國書局. 賴宜弘, 黃芬芬, & 楊雪華. (2015). 科技接受模式中文版量表之編製與相關研究. 亞東學報, (35), 201-221. 鍾家賢. (2021). 包容性數位轉型, 創造我國高齡者數位機會之探索. 臺灣經濟研究月刊, 44(9), 107-112. 蘇蕙芬, 余翌琟, 吳佳峰, & 陳克豪. (2020). 台灣高齡者認知功能與身體適能關係之探究. 成大體育學刊, 52(2), 1-26. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96961 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 隨著應用於高齡場域中社會機器人的發展，許多研究開始探討如何提升高齡者與機器人互動的品質與意願，以利建立長期的關係，改善其生活品質與幸福感。在人機互動中建立投契關係可以讓人機間的互動更為順暢，增加與其互動的意願與動機。為了改善高齡者與機器人的互動關係，本研究之研究目的為設計具有投契特性的機器人，增加高齡者的接受度以及與機器人的互動意願。特別針對互動中機器人的不同表情與包容程度對於高齡者與機器人建立投契程度的影響。
為回應本研究的研究問題：高齡者對於展現不同表情與包容度之機器人的偏好、接受度、投契、信任程度是否有差異？以及與對於不同投契特性之機器人建立投契的程度為何？本研究採取實驗法以探討機器人的投契特性對高齡者建立人機投契的影響。實驗參與者須進行一人二機的蘿蔔蹲互動遊戲，機器人在遊戲中會以不同的投契特性與之互動。本研究使用遊戲中的指定行為與自陳問卷來測量高齡者的偏好與投契態度等變項。 共有 53 位六十五歲（含）以上的高齡者參與實驗。研究結果顯示高齡者可以藉由互動遊戲與機器人建立投契關係，並在遊戲中感受到機器人的不同的包容程度，高齡者在遊戲中展現高度的包容性及積極參與。包容以及正向表情的特性可以提升高齡者與機器人的投契。本研究提供未來應用於高齡場域中的機器人設計、互動遊戲，增加機器人在互動中的包容或是正向的表情可以提升高齡者對於機器人的接受度，有利於建立投契關係，進一步提升機器人在高齡族群中的接受度與應用潛力，除此之外也對設計者提供實務建議，關注機器人的包容特性。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | With the development of social robots for the elderly, enhancing the quality of elderly individuals' interactions with robots, and facilitating long-term relationships have become an important issue. Establishing rapport in human-robot interaction can lead to smoother communication, increasing the motivation and willingness to engage. This study aims to design robots with rapport-building characteristics to increase the elderly's acceptance and willingness to interact. Specifically, focusing on how different expressions and inclusiveness displayed by robots influence the rapport-building process with elderly users.
A total of 53 older adults participated. The results showed that elderly individuals could establish rapport with robots through interactive games and perceive different inclusiveness from the robots during the game. The elderly participants demonstrated high engagement and inclusiveness in their interactions. Rapport characteristics, including inclusiveness and positive expressions, were found to enhance the rapport between the elderly and the robots. This study provides valuable insights for designing robots for elderly care applications. It also provides practical suggestions for designers. Incorporating inclusiveness and positive expressions into robots can increase their acceptance among the elderly, facilitate rapport-building, and enhance the potential for robots to be adopted and utilized within this demographic. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-02-25T16:14:48Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-02-25T16:14:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝 i
摘要 ii Abstract iii 目次 iv 圖次 vii 表次 viii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 3 第二章 文獻回顧 4 第一節 高齡者與機器人的人機互動 4 一、 高齡者的需求與特性 4 二、 高齡場域中的機器人 5 三、 高齡者與機器人的互動問題 8 第二節 高齡者與人機投契 10 一、 投契關係 10 二、 人機投契 11 三、 高齡者人機投契與包容設計 16 第三章 研究方法 20 第一節 研究設計 20 一、 受試者 20 二、 實驗設計 20 第二節 研究假設 23 第三節 研究流程 26 一、 實驗流程 26 第四節 研究問卷與量表 30 一、 基本資料及機器人接觸經驗 30 二、 十題項大五人格量表（Ten Item Personality Inventory, TIPI） 30 三、 人機互動自我效能量表（SE-HRI） 30 四、 機器人接受度量表 31 五、 機器人負面態度量表 31 六、 成人版基礎同理心量表 32 七、 互動經驗問卷與偏好 32 八、 投契量表 33 九、 信任 34 第四章 實驗結果 35 第一節 參與者基本資料 35 第二節 參與者對於不同表情與包容度之機器人的偏好 38 一、 研究變項之描述性統計 38 二、 參與者指定機器人次數分析 40 三、 參與者指定行為與對機器人態度之相關分析 44 四、 對機器人態度之比較 47 第三節 表情與包容程度對人機投契的影響 51 一、 表情對於高齡者人機投契的影響 51 二、 相同的包容程度中表情對於建立投契的影響 52 三、 包容程度對於高齡者人機投契的影響 54 四、 相同表情之下不同包容程度對於建立投契的影響 55 第四節 參與者對於機器人的表情與包容程度的感受 57 第五章 討論與結論 59 第一節 研究發現與討論 59 一、 高齡者與機器人可以透過遊戲建立高投契 59 二、 高齡者對於機器人有高度包容性 60 三、 包容與開心的投契特性可以提升高齡人機投契的建立 61 第二節 研究限制與未來建議 62 第三節 結論 63 參考文獻 64 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 投契 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 高齡者 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 包容 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 機器人表情 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 人機投契 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 人機互動 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Human-robot rapport | en |
| dc.subject | Robot expression | en |
| dc.subject | Inclusive | en |
| dc.subject | Rapport | en |
| dc.subject | Human-robot interaction | en |
| dc.subject | Elderly users | en |
| dc.title | 機器人的表情與包容程度對於高齡者建立人機投契影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Effect of Facial Expression and Inclusiveness of Robots on Elderly-robot Rapport Building | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 林維真 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | Weijane Lin | en |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 楊培珊;曾士桓 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Pei-Shan Yang;Shih-Huan Tseng | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 高齡者,人機互動,投契,人機投契,機器人表情,包容, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Elderly users,Human-robot interaction,Rapport,Human-robot rapport,Robot expression,Inclusive, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 76 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202500698 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-02-13 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 圖書資訊學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2027-02-13 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 圖書資訊學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.56 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。