請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96851完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 杜裕康 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | YU-KANG TU | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 張詠翔 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Yung-Hsiang Chang | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-24T16:15:20Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-02-25 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-02-24 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-02-04 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | References
1.Lidal, I.B., H.H. Holte, and G.E. Vist, Triage systems for pre-hospital emergency medical services - a systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 2013. 21(1): p. 28. 2.Iserson, K.V. and J.C. Moskop, Triage in medicine, part I: Concept, history, and types. Ann Emerg Med, 2007. 49(3): p. 275-81. 3.Peta, D., et al., Triage: A Global Perspective. J Emerg Nurs, 2023. 49(6): p. 814-825. 4.Christ, M., et al., Modern triage in the emergency department. Dtsch Arztebl Int, 2010. 107(50): p. 892-8. 5.Fernandes, C.M., et al., Five-level triage: a report from the ACEP/ENA Five-level Triage Task Force. J Emerg Nurs, 2005. 31(1): p. 39-50; quiz 118. 6.Kuriyama, A., S. Urushidani, and T. Nakayama, Five-level emergency triage systems: variation in assessment of validity. Emerg Med J, 2017. 34(11): p. 703-710. 7.Hinson, J.S., et al., Triage Performance in Emergency Medicine: A Systematic Review. Ann Emerg Med, 2019. 74(1): p. 140-152. 8.Zachariasse, J.M., et al., Performance of triage systems in emergency care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open, 2019. 9(5): p. e026471. 9.Bhaumik, S., et al., Prehospital triage tools across the world: a scoping review of the published literature. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med, 2022. 30(1): p. 32. 10.Kim, K. and B. Oh, Prehospital triage in emergency medical services system: A scoping review. Int Emerg Nurs, 2023. 69: p. 101293. 11.Abetz, J.W., et al., Review article: Pre-hospital provider clinical judgement upon arrival to the emergency department: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Emerg Med Australas, 2020. 32(6): p. 917-923. 12.Ebrahimi, M., et al., The reliability of the Australasian Triage Scale: a meta-analysis. World J Emerg Med, 2015. 6(2): p. 94-9. 13.Dallaire, C., et al., Interrater agreement of Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale scores assigned by base hospital and emergency department nurses. Cjem, 2010. 12(1): p. 45-9. 14.Ng, C.J., et al., Validation of the Taiwan triage and acuity scale: a new computerised five-level triage system. Emerg Med J, 2011. 28(12): p. 1026-31. 15.Buschhorn, H.M., et al., Emergency medical services triage using the emergency severity index: is it reliable and valid? J Emerg Nurs, 2013. 39(5): p. e55-63. 16.Smith, D.T., et al., Analyzing the Usability of the 5-Level Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale By Paramedics in the Prehospital Environment. J Emerg Nurs, 2015. 41(6): p. 489-95. 17.Leeies, M., et al., Prehospital Application of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale by Emergency Medical Services. Cjem, 2017. 19(1): p. 26-31. 18.Tsai, L.H., et al., Comparison of prehospital triage and five-level triage system at the emergency department. Emerg Med J, 2017. 34(11): p. 720-725. 19.Grosgurin, O., et al., Reliability and performance of the Swiss Emergency Triage Scale used by paramedics. Eur J Emerg Med, 2019. 26(3): p. 188-193. 20.Magnusson, C., et al., The performance of the EMS triage (RETTS-p) and the agreement between the field assessment and final hospital diagnosis: a prospective observational study among children < 16 years. BMC Pediatr, 2019. 19(1): p. 500. 21.Ng, C.J., et al., Validation of the five-tier Taiwan Triage and Acuity Scale for prehospital use by Emergency Medical Technicians. Emerg Med J, 2019. 36(8): p. 472-478. 22.Skjøt-Arkil, H., et al., Do prehospital providers and emergency nurses agree on triage assignment?: an efficacy study. Eur J Emerg Med, 2019. 26(1): p. 29-33. 23.Sung, S., et al., Correlation between the pre-hospital triage scale and emergency department triage scale. Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2019. 26(5): p. 281-287. 24.Magnusson, C., J. Herlitz, and C. Axelsson, Pre-hospital triage performance and emergency medical services nurse's field assessment in an unselected patient population attended to by the emergency medical services: a prospective observational study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med, 2020. 28(1): p. 81. 25.Yamamoto, A., A. Kuriyama, and T. Ikegami, Validity of a five-level prehospital triage system in Japan: A cohort study. Am J Emerg Med, 2021. 45: p. 329-334. 26.Chiang, W.C., et al., EMS in Taiwan: past, present, and future. Resuscitation, 2009. 80(1): p. 9-13. 27.Huan, T.L., et al., Emergency Medical Services in Taiwan: Past, Present, and Future. J Acute Med, 2023. 13(3): p. 91-103. 28.Ng, C.J., et al., Comparison between Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale and Taiwan Triage System in emergency departments. J Formos Med Assoc, 2010. 109(11): p. 828-37. 29.Cheng, M.T., et al., Physician gestalt for emergency department triage: A prospective videotaped study. Acad Emerg Med, 2022. 29(9): p. 1050-1056. 30.Richardson, L.D. and U. Hwang, Access to care: a review of the emergency medicine literature. Acad Emerg Med, 2001. 8(11): p. 1030-6. 31.Robinson, D.J., An integrative review: triage protocols and the effect on ED length of stay. J Emerg Nurs, 2013. 39(4): p. 398-408. 32.Stey, A.M., et al., Emergency Department Length of Stay and Mortality in Critically Injured Patients. J Intensive Care Med, 2022. 37(2): p. 278-287. 33.Habib, H. and M.K. Sudaryo, Association Between the Emergency Department Length of Stay and in-Hospital Mortality: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Open Access Emerg Med, 2023. 15: p. 313-323. 34.Göransson, K.E., et al., Thinking strategies used by Registered Nurses during emergency department triage. J Adv Nurs, 2008. 61(2): p. 163-72. 35.Vatnøy, T.K., et al., Triage assessment of registered nurses in the emergency department. Int Emerg Nurs, 2013. 21(2): p. 89-96. 36.Yuzeng, S. and L.L. Hui, Improving the wait time to triage at the emergency department. BMJ Open Qual, 2020. 9(1). 37.Shah, M.N., The formation of the emergency medical services system. Am J Public Health, 2006. 96(3): p. 414-23. 38.Al-Shaqsi, S., Models of International Emergency Medical Service (EMS) Systems. Oman Med J, 2010. 25(4): p. 320-3. 39.Brewer, L.A., 3rd, Baron Dominique Jean Larrey (1766-1842). Father of modern military surgery, innovater, humanist. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1986. 92(6): p. 1096-8. 40.Dick, W.F., Anglo-American vs. Franco-German emergency medical services system. Prehosp Disaster Med, 2003. 18(1): p. 29-35; discussion 35-7. 41.Adnet, F. and F. Lapostolle, International EMS systems: France. Resuscitation, 2004. 63(1): p. 7-9. 42.Pozner, C.N., et al., International EMS systems: The United States: past, present, and future. Resuscitation, 2004. 60(3): p. 239-44. 43.Black, J.J. and G.D. Davies, International EMS systems: United Kingdom. Resuscitation, 2005. 64(1): p. 21-9. 44.Trevithick, S., et al., International EMS systems: New South Wales, Australia. Resuscitation, 2003. 59(2): p. 165-70. 45.Langhelle, A., et al., International EMS Systems: the Nordic countries. Resuscitation, 2004. 61(1): p. 9-21. 46.Ong, M.E., et al., Comparison of emergency medical services systems in the pan-Asian resuscitation outcomes study countries: Report from a literature review and survey. Emerg Med Australas, 2013. 25(1): p. 55-63. 47.MacFarlane, C., C. van Loggerenberg, and W. Kloeck, International EMS systems in South Africa--past, present, and future. Resuscitation, 2005. 64(2): p. 145-8. 48.Babaei, H.A., et al., A comparative study on specialized services in pre-hospital emergencies in Iran and selected countries. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 2023. 12(1). 49.Bhattarai, H.K., et al., Prehospital Emergency Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review. Prehosp Disaster Med, 2023. 38(4): p. 495-512. 50.Chen, C.Y., et al., "Hearing AED integration program" - A innovative way to activate the emergency service system of community. Resuscitation, 2022. 181: p. 10-11. 51.Lee, A.F., et al., Effect of Placement of a Supraglottic Airway Device vs Endotracheal Intubation on Return of Spontaneous Circulation in Adults With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Taipei, Taiwan: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open, 2022. 5(2): p. e2148871. 52.Lin, H.Y., et al., Outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests after a decade of system-wide initiatives optimising community chain of survival in Taipei city. Resuscitation, 2022. 172: p. 149-158. 53.Yu, J.H., et al., Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency medical service response to out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in Taiwan: a retrospective observational study. Emerg Med J, 2021. 38(9): p. 679-684. 54.Blagg, C.R., Triage: Napoleon to the present day. Journal of nephrology, 2004. 17(4): p. 629-632. 55.Frykberg, E.R., Triage: principles and practice. Scand J Surg, 2005. 94(4): p. 272-8. 56.Bhalla, M.C., et al., Simple Triage Algorithm and Rapid Treatment and Sort, Assess, Lifesaving, Interventions, Treatment, and Transportation mass casualty triage methods for sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. Am J Emerg Med, 2015. 33(11): p. 1687-91. 57.Burkle, F.M., Jr., et al., Emergency medicine in the Persian Gulf War--Part 2. Triage methodology and lessons learned. Ann Emerg Med, 1994. 23(4): p. 748-54. 58.Burkle, F.M., Jr., S. Orebaugh, and B.R. Barendse, Emergency medicine in the Persian Gulf War--Part 1: Preparations for triage and combat casualty care. Ann Emerg Med, 1994. 23(4): p. 742-7. 59.Moskop, J.C. and K.V. Iserson, Triage in medicine, part II: Underlying values and principles. Ann Emerg Med, 2007. 49(3): p. 282-7. 60.FitzGerald, G., et al., Emergency department triage revisited. Emerg Med J, 2010. 27(2): p. 86-92. 61.Tam, H.L., S.F. Chung, and C.K. Lou, A review of triage accuracy and future direction. BMC Emerg Med, 2018. 18(1): p. 58. 62.M, J.M., The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale: A Canadian perspective on emergency department triage. Emerg Med (Fremantle), 2003. 15(1): p. 6-10. 63.Mirhaghi, A., et al., The Reliability of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale: Meta-analysis. N Am J Med Sci, 2015. 7(7): p. 299-305. 64.Lee, J.H., et al., Over-triage occurs when considering the patient's pain in Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS). PLoS One, 2019. 14(5): p. e0216519. 65.Jiménez, J.G., et al., Implementation of the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in the Principality of Andorra: Can triage parameters serve as emergency department quality indicators? Cjem, 2003. 5(5): p. 315-22. 66.Lee, J.Y., et al., The validity of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale in predicting resource utilization and the need for immediate life-saving interventions in elderly emergency department patients. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med, 2011. 19: p. 68. 67.Gravel, J., et al., The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale for Children: A Prospective Multicenter Evaluation. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 2012. 60(1): p. 71-77.e3. 68.The Australasian Triage Scale. Emerg Med (Fremantle), 2002. 14(3): p. 335-6. 69.Chamberlain, D.J., et al., Identification of the severe sepsis patient at triage: a prospective analysis of the Australasian Triage Scale. Emerg Med J, 2015. 32(9): p. 690-7. 70.Wuerz, R.C., et al., Implementation and refinement of the emergency severity index. Acad Emerg Med, 2001. 8(2): p. 170-6. 71.Sax, D.R., et al., Evaluation of Version 4 of the Emergency Severity Index in US Emergency Departments for the Rate of Mistriage. JAMA Network Open, 2023. 6(3): p. e233404-e233404. 72.Chmielewski, N. and J. Moretz, ESI Triage Distribution in U.S. Emergency Departments. Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal, 2022. 44(1): p. 46-53. 73.Aeimchanbanjong, K. and U. Pandee, Validation of different pediatric triage systems in the emergency department. World J Emerg Med, 2017. 8(3): p. 223-227. 74.Mirhaghi, A., et al., Reliability of the Emergency Severity Index: Meta-analysis. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J, 2015. 15(1): p. e71-7. 75.Gräff, I., et al., The German Version of the Manchester Triage System and its quality criteria--first assessment of validity and reliability. PLoS One, 2014. 9(2): p. e88995. 76.Zachariasse, J.M., et al., Validity of the Manchester Triage System in emergency care: A prospective observational study. PLoS One, 2017. 12(2): p. e0170811. 77.Parenti, N., et al., A systematic review on the validity and reliability of an emergency department triage scale, the Manchester Triage System. Int J Nurs Stud, 2014. 51(7): p. 1062-9. 78.Twomey, M., et al., The South African Triage Scale (adult version) provides reliable acuity ratings. Int Emerg Nurs, 2012. 20(3): p. 142-50. 79.Meyer, G.D., T.N. Meyer, and C.B. Gaunt, Validity of the South African Triage Scale in a rural district hospital. Afr J Emerg Med, 2018. 8(4): p. 145-149. 80.Dixon, J., et al., Using the South African Triage Scale for prehospital triage: a qualitative study. BMC Emerg Med, 2021. 21(1): p. 125. 81.Mould-Millman, N.K., et al., Validity and reliability of the South African Triage Scale in prehospital providers. BMC Emerg Med, 2021. 21(1): p. 8. 82.Markussen, D.L., et al., Validation of a modified South African triage scale in a high-resource setting: a retrospective cohort study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med, 2023. 31(1): p. 13. 83.Wangara, A.A., et al., Implementation and performance of the South African Triage Scale at Kenyatta National Hospital in Nairobi, Kenya. Int J Emerg Med, 2019. 12(1): p. 5. 84.Dalwai, M., et al., Is the South African Triage Scale valid for use in Afghanistan, Haiti and Sierra Leone? BMJ Glob Health, 2017. 2(2): p. e000160. 85.Dalwai, M., et al., Inter-rater and intrarater reliability of the South African Triage Scale in low-resource settings of Haiti and Afghanistan. Emerg Med J, 2018. 35(6): p. 379-383. 86.Conti, A., et al., Implementation of the South African Triage Scale (SATS) in a New Ambulance System in Beira, Mozambique: A Retrospective Observational Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022. 19(16). 87.Bazyar, J., et al., The Principles of Triage in Emergencies and Disasters: A Systematic Review. Prehosp Disaster Med, 2020. 35(3): p. 305-313. 88.Guan, G., et al., The use of early warning system scores in prehospital and emergency department settings to predict clinical deterioration: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 2022. 17(3): p. e0265559. 89.Saberian, P., et al., Comparing the prehospital NEWS with in-hospital ESI in predicting 30-day severe outcomes in emergency patients. BMC Emerg Med, 2022. 22(1): p. 42. 90.Wei, S., et al., The accuracy of the National Early Warning Score 2 in predicting early death in prehospital and emergency department settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Transl Med, 2023. 11(2): p. 95. 91.Smith, K.E., K. Lobay, and M. Bullard, P122: The use of decision support tools in the implementation of the Prehospital Canadian Triage Acuity Score (Pre-CTAS). CJEM, 2016. 18(S1): p. S119-S119. 92.Ghanbarzehi, N., et al., Effect of Triage Training on Concordance of Triage Level between Triage Nurses and Emergency Medical Technicians. J Clin Diagn Res, 2016. 10(5): p. Ic05-ic07. 93.Chang, Y.C., et al., Effectiveness of a five-level Paediatric Triage System: an analysis of resource utilisation in the emergency department in Taiwan. Emerg Med J, 2013. 30(9): p. 735-9. 94.Liu, T.T., et al., Validation of a five-level triage system in pediatric trauma and the effectiveness of triage nurse modification: A multi-center cohort analysis. Front Med (Lausanne), 2022. 9: p. 947501. 95.Sung, S.F., et al., Validity of a computerised five-level emergency triage system for patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Emerg Med J, 2013. 30(6): p. 454-8. 96.Ng, C.J., et al., Predictive factors for hospitalization of nonurgent patients in the emergency department. Medicine (Baltimore), 2016. 95(26): p. e4053. 97.Chang, W., et al., Using the Five-Level Taiwan Triage and Acuity Scale Computerized System: Factors in Decision Making by Emergency Department Triage Nurses. Clin Nurs Res, 2017. 26(5): p. 651-666. 98.Lim, Y.D., et al., Validity of the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale for predicting 30-day mortality due to severe trauma: a retrospective single-center study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 2020. 46(4): p. 895-901. 99.Chung, H.S., et al., Validity of the Korean triage and acuity scale in older patients compared to the adult group. Exp Gerontol, 2023. 175: p. 112136. 100.Park, J.B., et al., Reliability of Korean Triage and Acuity Scale: Interrater Agreement between Two Experienced Nurses by Real-Time Triage and Analysis of Influencing Factors to Disagreement of Triage Levels. J Korean Med Sci, 2019. 34(28): p. e189. 101.Lee, B., et al., Clinical Considerations When Applying Vital Signs in Pediatric Korean Triage and Acuity Scale. J Korean Med Sci, 2017. 32(10): p. 1702-1707. 102.Kwon, H., et al., The Korean Triage and Acuity Scale: associations with admission, disposition, mortality and length of stay in the emergency department. Int J Qual Health Care, 2019. 31(6): p. 449-455. 103.Bae, W., et al., Predictive Validity of a New Triage System for Outcomes in Patients Visiting Pediatric Emergency Departments: A Nationwide Study in Korea. Children (Basel), 2023. 10(6). 104.Chung, H.S., et al., Validation of the Korean Version of the Clinical Frailty Scale-Adjusted Korean Triage and Acuity Scale for Older Patients in the Emergency Department. Medicina (Kaunas), 2024. 60(6). 105.Moon, S.H., et al., Triage accuracy and causes of mistriage using the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale. PLoS One, 2019. 14(9): p. e0216972. 106.Kuriyama, A., T. Kaihara, and T. Ikegami, Validity of the Japan Acuity and Triage Scale in elderly patients: A cohort study. Am J Emerg Med, 2019. 37(12): p. 2159-2164. 107.Koyama, T., et al., A study of the effect of introduction of JTAS in the emergency room. Acute Med Surg, 2017. 4(3): p. 262-270. 108.Kuriyama, A., et al., Validity of the Japan Acuity and Triage Scale in adults: a cohort study. Emerg Med J, 2018. 35(6): p. 384-388. 109.Hamamoto, J., H. Yamase, and Y. Yamase, Impacts of the introduction of a triage system in Japan: a time series study. Int Emerg Nurs, 2014. 22(3): p. 153-8. 110.Takahashi, T., et al., 'Down-triage' for children with abnormal vital signs: evaluation of a new triage practice at a paediatric emergency department in Japan. Emerg Med J, 2016. 33(8): p. 533-7. 111.Funakoshi, H., et al., Validation of the modified Japanese Triage and Acuity Scale-based triage system emphasizing the physiologic variables or mechanism of injuries. Int J Emerg Med, 2016. 9(1): p. 1. 112.Rose, L., et al., Emergency Department Length of Stay for Critical Care Admissions. A Population-based Study. Ann Am Thorac Soc, 2016. 13(8): p. 1324-32. 113.Sprivulis, P.C., et al., The association between hospital overcrowding and mortality among patients admitted via Western Australian emergency departments. Med J Aust, 2006. 184(5): p. 208-12. 114.Jones, S., et al., Association between delays to patient admission from the emergency department and all-cause 30-day mortality. Emerg Med J, 2022. 39(3): p. 168-173. 115.Sun, B.C., et al., Effect of emergency department crowding on outcomes of admitted patients. Ann Emerg Med, 2013. 61(6): p. 605-611.e6. 116.Derose, S.F., et al., Emergency department crowding predicts admission length-of-stay but not mortality in a large health system. Med Care, 2014. 52(7): p. 602-11. 117.Maynou, L., et al., Factors associated with longer wait times, admission and reattendances in older patients attending emergency departments: an analysis of linked healthcare data. Emerg Med J, 2023. 40(4): p. 248-256. 118.Guttmann, A., et al., Association between waiting times and short term mortality and hospital admission after departure from emergency department: population based cohort study from Ontario, Canada. Bmj, 2011. 342: p. d2983. 119.Levis-Elmelech, T., D. Schwartz, and Y. Bitan, The effect of emergency department nurse experience on triage decision making. Human Factors in Healthcare, 2022. 2: p. 100015. 120.McLeod, S.L., et al., Interrater Reliability, Accuracy, and Triage Time Pre- and Post-implementation of a Real-Time Electronic Triage Decision-Support Tool. Ann Emerg Med, 2020. 75(4): p. 524-531. 121.Koo, T.K. and M.Y. Li, A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med, 2016. 15(2): p. 155-63. 122.van der Wulp, I. and H.F. van Stel, Adjusting weighted kappa for severity of mistriage decreases reported reliability of emergency department triage systems: a comparative study. J Clin Epidemiol, 2009. 62(11): p. 1196-201. 123.Tu, Y.K. and M.S. Gilthorpe, Key statistical and analytical issues for evaluating treatment effects in periodontal research. Periodontol 2000, 2012. 59(1): p. 75-88. 124.Worster, A., et al., Triage tool inter-rater reliability: a comparison of live versus paper case scenarios. J Emerg Nurs, 2007. 33(4): p. 319-23. 125.Lindskou, T.A., et al., Prehospital Early Warning Scores to Predict Mortality in Patients Using Ambulances. JAMA Netw Open, 2023. 6(8): p. e2328128. 126.Martín-Rodríguez, F., et al., Comparison of seven prehospital early warning scores to predict long-term mortality: a prospective, multicenter, ambulance-based study. Eur J Emerg Med, 2023. 30(3): p. 193-201. 127.Tanabe, P., et al., Reliability and validity of scores on The Emergency Severity Index version 3. Acad Emerg Med, 2004. 11(1): p. 59-65. 128.Candel, B.G., et al., The association between vital signs and clinical outcomes in emergency department patients of different age categories. Emerg Med J, 2022. 39(12): p. 903-911. 129.Tanabe, P., et al., The Emergency Severity Index (version 3) 5-level triage system scores predict ED resource consumption. J Emerg Nurs, 2004. 30(1): p. 22-9. 130.Chaou, C.H., et al., Analyzing Factors Affecting Emergency Department Length of Stay-Using a Competing Risk-accelerated Failure Time Model. Medicine (Baltimore), 2016. 95(14): p. e3263. 131.Chaou, C.H., et al., Predicting Length of Stay among Patients Discharged from the Emergency Department-Using an Accelerated Failure Time Model. PLoS One, 2017. 12(1): p. e0165756. 132.Lin, Y.-Y. and C.-S. Huang, Aging in Taiwan: Building a Society for Active Aging and Aging in Place. The Gerontologist, 2015. 56(2): p. 176-183. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96851 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 背景:
臺灣院前五級檢傷系統是一項新開發的檢傷工具，目的為提高院前檢傷的準確性和一致性。相較於過去的二級檢傷系統，臺灣院前五級檢傷系統能更詳細地分類患者的病情嚴重程度。本研究包含兩部分，第一部分評估緊急救護技術員與急診檢傷護理師之間的檢傷一致性。第二部分則是探討臺灣院前五級檢傷系統對病人到急診的院後結果的區分能力。 研究目的: 本研究旨在評估臺灣院前五級檢傷系統在以下兩個方面的臨床效能：（1）緊急救護技術員與急診檢傷護理師之間的檢傷一致性。（2）區分病人到急診的院後結果（如離開急診、住院、死亡及急診停留時間）的能力 方法: 研究一為橫斷性研究，納入10名緊急救護技術員與10名急診檢傷護理師對50個到院前電子病歷進行檢傷，並使用組內相關係數及多層次模型進行分析。研究二為前瞻性世代研究，分析2023年1月至12月期間，在臺灣桃園市由緊急醫療服務運送的10,713名患者。 結果: 研究一顯示，臺灣院前五級檢傷系統在考量多位評分者間的平均分數差異具有卓越的一致性（ICC = 0.96），在考量單一評分者間的絕對分數差異則具有中等一致性（ICC = 0.57）。雖然救護技術員的檢傷分數普遍高於檢傷護理師，但整體一致性仍非常高（r = 0.909）。研究二發現，臺灣院前五級檢傷系統能有效預測急診結果，分數越低的患者死亡率及資源使用需求越高。離開急診病人的中位停留時間為2.73小時，而住院病人則為13.90小時。 結論: 臺灣院前五級檢傷系統是一項可靠且有效的院前檢傷工具，可準確區分急診結果，並在醫療人員之間展現出高度的一致性，整合院前檢傷系統與院內檢傷系統有望優化患者流向及急診資源管理。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Introduction:
The five-level Taiwan Prehospital Triage System (TPTS) is a newly developed tool aimed at improving prehospital triage accuracy and consistency. Unlike the previous binary system, 2-level TPTS provides a more detailed categorization of patient severity. Study 1 examined inter-rater reliability among Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) and Triage Registered Nurses (TRNs), while Study 2 explored the system's ability to discriminate ability patient outcomes. Aims: This research aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the 5-level TPTS in two key areas: (1)its inter-rater reliability between EMTs and TRNs ; and (2) its ability to discriminate emergency department (ED) outcomes such as discharge, admission, mortality, and length of stay (LOS). Methods: In Study 1 assessed inter-rater reliability through a prospective design involving 10 EMTs and 10 TRNs rating 50 prehospital electronic medical records. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and multilevel models were used for analysis. Study 2, prospective cohort study, conducted in Taoyuan, Taiwan, from January 1 to December 31, 2023,analyzed 10,713 EMS-transported patients using the five-level TPTS. Results: Study 1 demonstrated excellent inter-rater reliability for multiple raters (ICC = 0.96) and moderate reliability for single raters (ICC = 0.57). EMTs generally scored higher than TRNs, though agreement was strong overall (r = 0.909). Study 2 revealed that 5-level TPTS effectively discriminated ED outcomes, with lower scores correlating with higher mortality and resource utilization. Discharged patients had a median LOS of 2.73 hours, compared to 13.90 hours for admitted patients. Conclusions: The five-level TPTS is a reliable and effective tool for prehospital triage. It accurately discriminates ED outcomes and demonstrates strong alignment among healthcare providers, making it a valuable addition to emergency medical services. Further integration with hospital triage systems could enhance patient flow and resource management. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-02-24T16:15:20Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-02-24T16:15:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Contents
口試委員會審定書 i 誌謝 ii 中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 iv List of Abbreviations vi Contents ix List of Figures xii List of Tables xiv List of Appendices i Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Definitions 3 Chapter 2. Literature Review 5 2.1 A Global Overview of EMS System 5 2.2 Evolution and Development of Taiwan's EMS 9 2.3 The Evolution of Triage 10 2.4 Global Emergency Department Triage Systems 12 2.5 Global Prehospital Triage Systems 27 2.6 Triage System in EDs in Asia 32 2.7 Prehospital Triage System in Asia 40 2.8 Impact of ED LOS and Resource Use on Patient Outcomes 45 2.9 Research Gap 48 2.10 Research Aims 49 Chapter 3. Materials and Methods 50 3.1.1 Study Design and Methodology 50 3.1.2 Participants and Setting 50 3.1.3 The Two-Level and Five-Level TPTS 51 3.1.4 Data Collection and Participant Procedure 52 3.1.5 Outcomes 54 3.1.6 Statistical Analysis 54 3.2 Methods of Study 2 57 3.2.1 Study Design 57 3.2.2 Participants and Setting 57 3.2.3 Five-Level Taiwan Prehospital Triage System (TPTS) 58 3.2.4 Data Collection 61 3.2.5 Outcomes 62 3.2.6 Statistical Analysis 63 4.1 Results of Study 1 65 4.1.1 Patient Flow and Enrollment 65 4.1.2 Characteristics of the study population 67 4.1.3 Main results 69 4.1.4 Variance Components Model 77 4.1.5 Two-Level Multilevel analysis 81 4.1.6 Three-Level Multilevel analysis 87 4.2 Results of Study 2 94 4.2.1 Patient Flow and Enrollment 94 4.2.2 Characteristics of the study population 96 4.2.3 Main results 100 4.2.4 Cumulative Incidence for Different Events 102 4.2.5 Proportional Cause-Specific Hazards Models for different events 126 4.2.6 Exploring the Distribution of ESI Score through Stratification 132 Chapter 5. Discussion 137 5.1 Discussion of Study 1 137 5.1.1 Major findings 137 5.1.2 Comparison with previous studies 138 5.1.3 Strengths 141 5.1.4 Limitations and future work 142 5.2 Discussion of Study 2 144 5.2.1 Major findings 144 5.2.2 Comparison with previous studies 146 5.2.3 Strengths 150 5.2.4 Limitations and future work 150 Chapter 6. Conclusion 152 Appendix 154 I. Supplemental figures 154 II. Supplemental tables 157 III. Supplementary R and SAS Code for Data Analysis 159 References 172 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject | 院前檢傷 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 到院前緊急救護 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 台灣急診五級檢傷系統 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 台灣院前五級檢傷系統 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Prehospital Triage | en |
| dc.subject | TPTS | en |
| dc.subject | TTAS | en |
| dc.subject | EMS | en |
| dc.title | 評估台灣到院前五級檢傷系統在緊急醫療救護中的有效性：評分者間信度與患者結果預測 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Five-Level Taiwan Prehospital Triage System (TPTS) in Emergency Medical Services: Inter-Rater Reliability and Patient Outcome Prediction | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張淑惠;江文莒 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | SHU-HUI CHANG ;WEN-CHU CHIANG | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 台灣院前五級檢傷系統,台灣急診五級檢傷系統,到院前緊急救護,院前檢傷, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | TPTS,TTAS,EMS,Prehospital Triage, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 180 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202500299 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-02-05 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 流行病學與預防醫學研究所 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2025-02-25 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 流行病學與預防醫學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-1.pdf | 3 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。